Instead of rotating the curve, you can make the POV change during time. Parametrize the path of the POV, deduce the equation of the plane onto which the projection will be done in terms of the coordinate of the POV and make a change of basis to get rid of the z coordinate. Sounds more difficult but is actually not that hard.
I'm not sure, but I think moving pov away from the Z axis requires a lot more work. You need to use a perspective projection matrix, think about FOV. The camera is a vector and the direction the position looks is backwards, and a lot more complicated stuff. When I tried to code this using c# I messed up on so many levels that I gave up, I had a deadline for the project so I used an external library. I will definitely write proper poor 3d library only for sake of my linear algebra knowledge
@@slayvict I don’t really know what a perspective projection Matrix is but if you have a POV that always look at the center of the 3D space, you can deduce the equation of the plane you project onto, the equation of the projection of the original 3D curve, the change of basis matrix only with the coordinate of the POV. Which means that if you parametrize the POV, you can actually do exactly as much as with a fixed point. I did this a few weeks ago and it worked perfectly.
@@samylahlou Perspective projection matrix is simply division by z axis raised to some power like 0.4 to both x axis and y axis. it took me too long to realise this simple fact in making 4-cube.
Love it, before this video came out I decided to play around with 3D rotations because of the tease at the end of last video. I got it working using a rotation matrix and the formulae erre actually much simpler than yours, although I cannot as easily change the rotation axis. I'd probably have to rotate twice. Anyways earlier today I made an interactive program in desmos where you can move on the z axis to and from a unit sphere around the origin. You can change certain parameters like opacheness and auto rotation. Maybe I'll post it somewhere when I'm finished because I'm honestly a bit pround about it ^^' About the 4D case I think it would be quite similar if youuse the same formula to project it first from R⁴ to R³ and then to R². Maybe something like 30/30-w*[x,y,z,0] (w is the 4th coord) again and from there you have it in 3D again. Maybe I'll play around eith it tommorrow xD
Update: So I tried the 4D thing and in theory it seems to work. I've succesfully created a grid of the "surface" of a hypersphere. But I am not happy with my projection algorithm 1/((d-z)*(d-w))*(x,y). It is simply the one for 3D applied twice and because of that it treats the z and w axis equal which I do not like. Moving 1 across the z axis looks the same as moving 1 across the w axis. Maybe I'll find a better formula Update: I made a Hypercube and I got it spinning and I actually got an animation similar to the one we all know where it turns inside out. I prijected it from 4d to 3d by first creating a point like a lightsource and then calculated it's 3d shadow on the x,y,z space. The difference to before was to make that point independent from the observer
@@didodido883 It was still an interesting watch, so thank you. I think my formula actually works relatively fine. It would be p(x,y,z,w)=d2/(d2-w) * [x,y,z] to have it in 3D and then you can just use the method from the video to get in to 2D. At this step you can use the 2D rotation stuff from video one to rotate it around any plane like the x-w plane to get some cool effects. Edit: maybe I should add that d2 is just a constant referring to the 4D point from which to project to the x-y-z hyperplane. It has the coordinates (0,0,0,d2)
4D: maybe, there's a map editor for 4D miner, and you could use something like marching [hyper-]cubes to determine which blocks would make part of the mesh.
Why not? From the last video I got the idea that you could have a graph rotating round a point which is already rotating around another point and even that would be rotating around a third point. All at the same time. Or whatever craziness.
even easier easy way: rotate in geometric algebra, then the rotated function is just exp(-theta/2 B) v exp(theta/2 B) where B is a unit bivector representing the plane that the rotation is occurring in
Traditional linear algebra doesn't have vector multiplication beyond the dot and cross products, though those do respectively correspond to the cosine and sine functions. A true vector product, like the one from geometric algebra, would be akin to replacing cosine and sine with an exponential. In fact, in geometric algebra, rotating a vector v around an axis a by angle θ is done by exp(θa/2)*v*exp(-θa/2). (Why the /2? Because the coefficient is more related to the area of the circular sector than the arc length around it. Alternatively, it's quantum. Either way, quaternions work the exact same way.)
Could you link the working Desmos graph in the description, I can't figure out what's wrong with mine and the working one would help me find my problem.
Can we share links on youtube? I’ve tried before and it hasn’t let me before… I wouldn’t mind sharing a fully functional parametric 3D grapher I made on desmos.
@@CraxulatorSo I just pasted the share link and posted the comment, but it doesn’t display as a comment when I reload the comments, so let me know if you can actually see the link.
Bro how do you even plot that in Desmos? always struggle with the theta variable, so I tried others, but the outcome is far away from what you're showing. Can you do a simplified version where you show the equation in Desmos? for sure saying x=f(t) never works for me
When I try to copy these equations into Desmos, I'm getting very choppy animation, instead of the nice smooth animation in the video. My computer's CPU is an Intel Core i7-6700, which isn't blazing, but seems fine for most things. Is that the problem, or am I doing something wrong?
I'm assuming projection of 4D graphs would require the projection algorithm twice, right? The first projection would project the 4D graph onto a 3D surface, and the second projection would just be the same as shown in the video, to project the 3D projection onto a 2D surface. Sure, the first projection would be more complicated, and the entire graph function would look like a nightmare, but I guess that's doable? I'm not sure if Rodrigues' Rotation Formula works though, I still don't understand rotations in 4D... I haven't really thought about all this much, so what I just said may or may not be wrong, so if there's any smarter people here in the comments, it would be nice to share your insight.
Hey! You probably aren’t gonna read this, but I’m a fellow abuser of desmos. I would really love to show you some of the wacky stuff I’ve made in desmos, if you’re interested. I have a graph about a rhombicosidodecahedron, all 3-d rendered with multiple variable side lengths, and it’s kinda the coolest thing I’ve made in desmos. I’d give you a link, but I tried that last video and I think the algorithm thought I was a bot and deleted the comment. Love the videos, I was one of your first thousand subs (although I just subbed like 2 days ago). If you wanna see it, just give this a reply and I’ll give you the link ASAP.
Not sure if youtube will let me share links (hasn’t worked for me before) but I could share a fully configurable parametric-3D desmos graph I made. I set it up so you could define the x,y,z components of the graph as functions of x and y, i.e. X(x,y), Y(x,y), Z(x,y). It allows you to make dummy variables for time/motion so you can animate surfaces, as well having a fully functional Cartesian and spherical trace function that can dynamically scale to the overall parameters of the surface.
@@SlimEk_ /calculator/dk4saqishd, let me know if that works. If you have any questions or need any help feel free to comment back. My desmos username is sleepyzs Sorry for all the extra write up, but hopefully it can be useful for you and anyone else since I tend to be particular with certain aspects and intricacies of my graphs. I used a variety of techniques and functions so people who are just starting to dabble with desmos (or even those who use it) can pick up new tricks. Just some details about the graph: - I intentionally made it so the color scheme would "look the way it should" in reverse contrast mode (IMO a lot easier on the eyes), but you can easily change C_hsv by playing with the (-)105 value in the nested mod for the hue definition. The other parts of the nested mods control the density/interval of colors since I defined C_hsv as a list (allowing me to color the multipart 3D graph with subtle color offsets) - the camera system is setup with degrees as its basis to give you more fine control for viewing angles since radians isn't always as approachable for everyone. Also theta_xy is the "yaw" while theta_xz is the "pitch"; you can either control the camera in panning mode where you can move a 2D draggable point to pan around, or the other option is to use a slider mode labeled in the UI control menu where you can get a more "precise" control of your view angles if panning mode isn't as intuitive for you. Note initially I had a theta_yz but I functionally set that to 0 since it only functionally rotates the overall image in a strictly 2D sense, something you could achieve to similar results with the base camera system. - the Zoom slider in the UI controls is a slider with left zooming in and right zooming out. - the trace system was inspired by my memories of using a TI-84 in high school, but I wanted to add a spherical trace as well. Every component for the trace system is within the Grapher folder. Note: I tend to make my desmos graphs as minimally redundant as possible so this means using a lot of binary switches to dynamically modify functional parameters, as well as stacking related functions/graphing elements in the same entry line, but everything that is related is together. The only reason something would not be with its associated parts is because of the limitations of element types (list variables, fixed variables, point indices). - because I hate repeatedly pressing undo to reset my graphs back to its original configuration, I provided a "tappable" Reset button in the UI control menu that will reset any modified switches/elements in the folders, except for user declared definitions (i.e. X(x,y)=x+y). This should allow you to choose if you want to entirely reset the graph or just use the reverse immediately prior changes. - you can graph in a polar mode using r and theta variable definitions in X,Y,Z. The only change is theta has to be called as theta_R which allows you to use it in a 3D context, using plain theta will not do anything. A tip for anyone who may like it: desmos allows you to use the atan2 function which is what you need to make theta_R work, theta_R=tan^-1(y,x) [rather than the typical tan^-1(y/x)]. The atan2 function is technically/implicitly what you actually are using when you're defining the Principle argument for complex numbers (Arg(z) vs arg(z)) as atan2 directly acknowledges the signs of the inputs allowing you to differentiate tan^-1(sqrt(2)/2,sqrt(2)/2) from tan^-1(-sqrt(2)/2,-sqrt(2)/2). - because the graph is relatively lightweight (I did 99% of the construction and usage on my iPad) the time/motion variable m animates at relatively smooth framerate (very minimal lag even panning around while animated); if you experience lag either reduce the speed of m or you can alternatively modify n_0 which controls the mapping density of the graph, at base it is set to 200 (it animates perfectly smoothly on my iPad). Note: the line definition (continuous, dashed, points) has a progressively lower impact on the animation, so unless you want a strict wireframe/mesh map, stick to the point map since it generally gives you more granular surface definition.
It's an integral, and very few examples can easily be solved in closed form. It's a little more likely to be able to do so for parametric equations, but for simple x-input and y-output equations, it's very challenging to do these integrals. The setup uses dx and dy, to form a triangle that represents each infinitesimal length element. The base is dx, the height is dy, and the hypotenuse is dL for the infinitesimal length of the curve. Using the Pythagorean theorem, we get dL = sqrt(dx^2 + dy^2). Rearranging for dL/dx, we get: dL/dx = sqrt(1 + (dy/dx)^2) Which we can integrate to find the arc length along a curve. dL = integral sqrt(1 + (dy/dx)^2) dx An introductory example to use, is y=x^(3/2), which allows us to simplify the integrand to sqrt(1 + x), that can be solved by u-substitution, to produce L = (1 + x2)^(3/2) - (1 + x1)^(3/2), to find the length along the curve between points at x1 and x2. A much more interesting example, is coshes and sinches. For these curves, you can use the hyperbolic counterpart of the Pythagorean trig identity, which is cosh(x)^2 + sinh(x)^2 = -1, to simplify the integrand. It turns out that the arc length integration result for coshes and sinches, just toggles the "co-" prefix on and off. For this family of functions, whether you are finding slope, area, or arc length, you always just flip/flop between cosh and sinh every time. Constants make it a little more challenging, but still solvable.
WOOOOOOO PART 3 LETS GOOOOO
Yes part 3 lets goooooooooo
Alright. Let's go.
Lets goooooooooo
YESSIR
saying "LETSS GOO" is pointless
This is just like drawing a cube on a paper. We stretch one face of square linearly along the plane to make it a cube. This concept is interesting
Instead of rotating the curve, you can make the POV change during time. Parametrize the path of the POV, deduce the equation of the plane onto which the projection will be done in terms of the coordinate of the POV and make a change of basis to get rid of the z coordinate. Sounds more difficult but is actually not that hard.
I'm not sure, but I think moving pov away from the Z axis requires a lot more work. You need to use a perspective projection matrix, think about FOV. The camera is a vector and the direction the position looks is backwards, and a lot more complicated stuff. When I tried to code this using c# I messed up on so many levels that I gave up, I had a deadline for the project so I used an external library. I will definitely write proper poor 3d library only for sake of my linear algebra knowledge
@@slayvict I don’t really know what a perspective projection Matrix is but if you have a POV that always look at the center of the 3D space, you can deduce the equation of the plane you project onto, the equation of the projection of the original 3D curve, the change of basis matrix only with the coordinate of the POV. Which means that if you parametrize the POV, you can actually do exactly as much as with a fixed point. I did this a few weeks ago and it worked perfectly.
@@samylahlou Perspective projection matrix is simply division by z axis raised to some power like 0.4 to both x axis and y axis. it took me too long to realise this simple fact in making 4-cube.
to mani leters
NO WAY I WAS JUST DONE WATCHING PART 2. THIS MATERIAL IS PURELY BONKERS. Let's goooooo bean dude
To avoid the formulas becoming too unwieldy, I like to use shadertoy instead of desmos. Though that doesn't do as well with parametric equations
Okay that was beautiful 3 part series you easily earned the sub
This is answering a lot of long time questions I just never bothered to go look for - but so glad I found
I love this series! And i love that it actually gives an insight into the concept of how 3D images on computers work!
Your videos are amazing! Thank you for making them.
This is why math is beautiful
I saw the first two videos a few days ago and now I'm a desmos wizard.
The fact that Desmos now has a 3d version makes this video very useful.
Bro! Your channel is an absolute goldmine of youtube! Golden Content!!! Keep it up man:)
Damn the subs be growing at 2k a day
You deserve even more
As one of the few people who actaully drew 3D stuff in desmos this is easy.
1 step closer to creating doom in desmos.
"Spiral vortex"
So just an ordinairy spiral, but the radius is exponential?
That ought to be an interesting projection :)
God I love your content
I love watching the number of subscribers grow!
Love it, before this video came out I decided to play around with 3D rotations because of the tease at the end of last video. I got it working using a rotation matrix and the formulae erre actually much simpler than yours, although I cannot as easily change the rotation axis. I'd probably have to rotate twice.
Anyways earlier today I made an interactive program in desmos where you can move on the z axis to and from a unit sphere around the origin. You can change certain parameters like opacheness and auto rotation. Maybe I'll post it somewhere when I'm finished because I'm honestly a bit pround about it ^^'
About the 4D case I think it would be quite similar if youuse the same formula to project it first from R⁴ to R³ and then to R². Maybe something like 30/30-w*[x,y,z,0] (w is the 4th coord) again and from there you have it in 3D again. Maybe I'll play around eith it tommorrow xD
Update: So I tried the 4D thing and in theory it seems to work. I've succesfully created a grid of the "surface" of a hypersphere. But I am not happy with my projection algorithm 1/((d-z)*(d-w))*(x,y). It is simply the one for 3D applied twice and because of that it treats the z and w axis equal which I do not like. Moving 1 across the z axis looks the same as moving 1 across the w axis.
Maybe I'll find a better formula
Update: I made a Hypercube and I got it spinning and I actually got an animation similar to the one we all know where it turns inside out.
I prijected it from 4d to 3d by first creating a point like a lightsource and then calculated it's 3d shadow on the x,y,z space. The difference to before was to make that point independent from the observer
@@WhyneedanAlias steal the code from here.
ua-cam.com/video/4URVJ3D8e8k/v-deo.html
or i think source code is not being provided in that video.
@@didodido883 It was still an interesting watch, so thank you.
I think my formula actually works relatively fine. It would be p(x,y,z,w)=d2/(d2-w) * [x,y,z] to have it in 3D and then you can just use the method from the video to get in to 2D. At this step you can use the 2D rotation stuff from video one to rotate it around any plane like the x-w plane to get some cool effects.
Edit: maybe I should add that d2 is just a constant referring to the 4D point from which to project to the x-y-z hyperplane. It has the coordinates (0,0,0,d2)
Sense you proj from 4 space, can you proj double rotation to 2 space with your formula?
even with b1 i can understand you, such a good job!
Wow, that is a monster of an equation!
Great video❤, could you make a video about how to mirror any graph over any point or any line?
4D: maybe, there's a map editor for 4D miner, and you could use something like marching [hyper-]cubes to determine which blocks would make part of the mesh.
my favourite series :)
you should make a series on transforming an axis into any curve, i did it for a parabola and it gave some pretty interesting results
Thank you a lot of knowledge, could you make a lot of math like this, I love you.
You are honestly just incredible
At 20:00, would it be possible to have it spinning like it is now and simultaneously rotating along the line through itself like it was just before?
Yes but you will have to use the rotating equation multiple times
Why not? From the last video I got the idea that you could have a graph rotating round a point which is already rotating around another point and even that would be rotating around a third point. All at the same time. Or whatever craziness.
Keep up the good work, Beanie!
even easier easy way: rotate in geometric algebra, then the rotated function is just exp(-theta/2 B) v exp(theta/2 B) where B is a unit bivector representing the plane that the rotation is occurring in
daily portion of desmos madness :D
It would be nice to have a complete desmos tutorial, i dont even know how to do parametrics equations
Bro, your vids are amazing. BONS PRA KRL. Keep on the awesome work!
An idea to spend a video on geometric algebra? It seems to do miracles on computer graphics.
Liked before watching
"We're gonna go for the general case" after setting the viewing point (0,0,30) rather than generalizing it.
lol
18:08 I tried in a different axis of rotation but forgot to normalise and crashed Desmos
Weeeee, spining graphs!!
im waiting for part 4
my brain exploded watching this video
Good job, and amusing persona
I wonder if this could be simplified with vector multiplication instead of sin and cos.
Traditional linear algebra doesn't have vector multiplication beyond the dot and cross products, though those do respectively correspond to the cosine and sine functions. A true vector product, like the one from geometric algebra, would be akin to replacing cosine and sine with an exponential. In fact, in geometric algebra, rotating a vector v around an axis a by angle θ is done by exp(θa/2)*v*exp(-θa/2). (Why the /2? Because the coefficient is more related to the area of the circular sector than the arc length around it. Alternatively, it's quantum. Either way, quaternions work the exact same way.)
@@angeldude101 no shit! That's crazy. I just started learning about dot and cross products. The rabbit hole just keeps getting deeper
Nice it's finally here
you are an artist
Could you link the working Desmos graph in the description, I can't figure out what's wrong with mine and the working one would help me find my problem.
it doesn't work for me :(
yes this would be so cool! I hope they get around to adding the link to the description.
Can we share links on youtube? I’ve tried before and it hasn’t let me before… I wouldn’t mind sharing a fully functional parametric 3D grapher I made on desmos.
@@QP9237 Yes you can! Just copy and paste the link...
@@CraxulatorSo I just pasted the share link and posted the comment, but it doesn’t display as a comment when I reload the comments, so let me know if you can actually see the link.
Matbatwings did method two in minecraft with redstone, such a cool creation
This is beautiful.
It's very hard to follow. Anyway, you are very clever. It was a MBA cause?
Your videos remind me a lot of a guy I used to watch called Sen Zen
what if you wanted the rotation axis to rotate around a different axis
That man has a brain bigger than my mom
Can't wait for Part 4
You explained to Principe of Ray Tracing by the way!
You just had to upload while I was recording, now I had to restart :(
Bro how do you even plot that in Desmos? always struggle with the theta variable, so I tried others, but the outcome is far away from what you're showing. Can you do a simplified version where you show the equation in Desmos? for sure saying x=f(t) never works for me
gg my man jumped to 6k subs from 1.5k in 2 days
yeah everyone only subs to him for his content, not for anything else. They probably wanted to see this so they could copy him and brag about it.
Beautiful.
i see the mysterious youtube algorithm has caught you ;)
insane big pog content
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🗣️🗣️🗣️🗣️❗❗❗❗💯💯💯💯 Gatech quality
no part 4? big sad 😭
UA-cam recomendations in 6am be like
bro is cracked at desmos
Woooooot!
When I try to copy these equations into Desmos, I'm getting very choppy animation, instead of the nice smooth animation in the video. My computer's CPU is an Intel Core i7-6700, which isn't blazing, but seems fine for most things. Is that the problem, or am I doing something wrong?
Ur awesome :)
yoooooooooo this was soo cool
This is gold!!
this is gonna be fun
More please 🙇♂️
Ok, now what about rotate a 4D graph in a 3D space?
Thanks to this mindblowing video I managed to make a square graph without infinite exponents.
Here it is btw:
|x-y|+|x+y|=1
Por qué no subes más videos? 😢
I don’t suppose there is a desmos link to this? Just type in some numbers and it does the rotation for me?
That would be great
1:50 Can you Pull it, Twist it, Bop it?
Very educational.
this is real cool
You might wanna stand a bit away from the mic when you breath oops
😢 y did blud stopped making videos
PART 3 LETS GOO
Amazing!!!
Could you give me the matrix operations that produced graph of projection on 9:24 minutes of Part 3? Thanks
jesse from breaking bad explaining maths (meths) yo
I'm assuming projection of 4D graphs would require the projection algorithm twice, right? The first projection would project the 4D graph onto a 3D surface, and the second projection would just be the same as shown in the video, to project the 3D projection onto a 2D surface. Sure, the first projection would be more complicated, and the entire graph function would look like a nightmare, but I guess that's doable?
I'm not sure if Rodrigues' Rotation Formula works though, I still don't understand rotations in 4D...
I haven't really thought about all this much, so what I just said may or may not be wrong, so if there's any smarter people here in the comments, it would be nice to share your insight.
Hey! You probably aren’t gonna read this, but I’m a fellow abuser of desmos. I would really love to show you some of the wacky stuff I’ve made in desmos, if you’re interested. I have a graph about a rhombicosidodecahedron, all 3-d rendered with multiple variable side lengths, and it’s kinda the coolest thing I’ve made in desmos. I’d give you a link, but I tried that last video and I think the algorithm thought I was a bot and deleted the comment. Love the videos, I was one of your first thousand subs (although I just subbed like 2 days ago). If you wanna see it, just give this a reply and I’ll give you the link ASAP.
what about if i waht to rotate points in 3D, and i can input XYZ as i want in that point?
Woo hooo thank you!!!!
Lets go🎉 episode 3
18:18 he sounds so fed up 💀
you should work for desmos
If we can project 3d onto 2d... maybe we can project 4d into 3d...?
How to rotate f(x,y) 3D function??!!!!!!
I think you should try to convert it into parametric form and do it this way :)
Not sure if youtube will let me share links (hasn’t worked for me before) but I could share a fully configurable parametric-3D desmos graph I made. I set it up so you could define the x,y,z components of the graph as functions of x and y, i.e. X(x,y), Y(x,y), Z(x,y). It allows you to make dummy variables for time/motion so you can animate surfaces, as well having a fully functional Cartesian and spherical trace function that can dynamically scale to the overall parameters of the surface.
@@QP9237 please share the link, if UA-cam deletes a comment, send the main link (without the domain), and then I can copy and add the domain.
@@SlimEk_ /calculator/dk4saqishd, let me know if that works. If you have any questions or need any help feel free to comment back. My desmos username is sleepyzs
Sorry for all the extra write up, but hopefully it can be useful for you and anyone else since I tend to be particular with certain aspects and intricacies of my graphs. I used a variety of techniques and functions so people who are just starting to dabble with desmos (or even those who use it) can pick up new tricks.
Just some details about the graph:
- I intentionally made it so the color scheme would "look the way it should" in reverse contrast mode (IMO a lot easier on the eyes), but you can easily change C_hsv by playing with the (-)105 value in the nested mod for the hue definition. The other parts of the nested mods control the density/interval of colors since I defined C_hsv as a list (allowing me to color the multipart 3D graph with subtle color offsets)
- the camera system is setup with degrees as its basis to give you more fine control for viewing angles since radians isn't always as approachable for everyone. Also theta_xy is the "yaw" while theta_xz is the "pitch"; you can either control the camera in panning mode where you can move a 2D draggable point to pan around, or the other option is to use a slider mode labeled in the UI control menu where you can get a more "precise" control of your view angles if panning mode isn't as intuitive for you. Note initially I had a theta_yz but I functionally set that to 0 since it only functionally rotates the overall image in a strictly 2D sense, something you could achieve to similar results with the base camera system.
- the Zoom slider in the UI controls is a slider with left zooming in and right zooming out.
- the trace system was inspired by my memories of using a TI-84 in high school, but I wanted to add a spherical trace as well. Every component for the trace system is within the Grapher folder. Note: I tend to make my desmos graphs as minimally redundant as possible so this means using a lot of binary switches to dynamically modify functional parameters, as well as stacking related functions/graphing elements in the same entry line, but everything that is related is together. The only reason something would not be with its associated parts is because of the limitations of element types (list variables, fixed variables, point indices).
- because I hate repeatedly pressing undo to reset my graphs back to its original configuration, I provided a "tappable" Reset button in the UI control menu that will reset any modified switches/elements in the folders, except for user declared definitions (i.e. X(x,y)=x+y). This should allow you to choose if you want to entirely reset the graph or just use the reverse immediately prior changes.
- you can graph in a polar mode using r and theta variable definitions in X,Y,Z. The only change is theta has to be called as theta_R which allows you to use it in a 3D context, using plain theta will not do anything. A tip for anyone who may like it: desmos allows you to use the atan2 function which is what you need to make theta_R work, theta_R=tan^-1(y,x) [rather than the typical tan^-1(y/x)]. The atan2 function is technically/implicitly what you actually are using when you're defining the Principle argument for complex numbers (Arg(z) vs arg(z)) as atan2 directly acknowledges the signs of the inputs allowing you to differentiate tan^-1(sqrt(2)/2,sqrt(2)/2) from tan^-1(-sqrt(2)/2,-sqrt(2)/2).
- because the graph is relatively lightweight (I did 99% of the construction and usage on my iPad) the time/motion variable m animates at relatively smooth framerate (very minimal lag even panning around while animated); if you experience lag either reduce the speed of m or you can alternatively modify n_0 which controls the mapping density of the graph, at base it is set to 200 (it animates perfectly smoothly on my iPad). Note: the line definition (continuous, dashed, points) has a progressively lower impact on the animation, so unless you want a strict wireframe/mesh map, stick to the point map since it generally gives you more granular surface definition.
@@SlimEk_Hey so I posted like you said without the domain but looks like youtube keeps deleting it when try putting any part of link into comments.
Thanks
How did you make this tho? I haven't done much outside of the regular desmos calculator
you are awesome
How to calculate the LENGHT of any graph?
It's an integral, and very few examples can easily be solved in closed form. It's a little more likely to be able to do so for parametric equations, but for simple x-input and y-output equations, it's very challenging to do these integrals.
The setup uses dx and dy, to form a triangle that represents each infinitesimal length element. The base is dx, the height is dy, and the hypotenuse is dL for the infinitesimal length of the curve. Using the Pythagorean theorem, we get dL = sqrt(dx^2 + dy^2).
Rearranging for dL/dx, we get:
dL/dx = sqrt(1 + (dy/dx)^2)
Which we can integrate to find the arc length along a curve.
dL = integral sqrt(1 + (dy/dx)^2) dx
An introductory example to use, is y=x^(3/2), which allows us to simplify the integrand to sqrt(1 + x), that can be solved by u-substitution, to produce L = (1 + x2)^(3/2) - (1 + x1)^(3/2), to find the length along the curve between points at x1 and x2.
A much more interesting example, is coshes and sinches. For these curves, you can use the hyperbolic counterpart of the Pythagorean trig identity, which is cosh(x)^2 + sinh(x)^2 = -1, to simplify the integrand. It turns out that the arc length integration result for coshes and sinches, just toggles the "co-" prefix on and off. For this family of functions, whether you are finding slope, area, or arc length, you always just flip/flop between cosh and sinh every time. Constants make it a little more challenging, but still solvable.
Part 4!!! Plz
Brilliant
What was the MOB function?