Can you find this infinite product in one step?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 лют 2025
  • poof

КОМЕНТАРІ • 40

  • @givrally
    @givrally Рік тому +36

    Finally, a fast converging series for computing 2/3 !

    • @jixpuzzle
      @jixpuzzle Рік тому +2

      Lmao 🤣. That was spoiler haha.

    • @givrally
      @givrally Рік тому

      @@jixpuzzle Haha, you're right, sorry for the spoiler 😂

  • @youtubeuserdan4017
    @youtubeuserdan4017 Рік тому +40

    The type of math that makes you smile.

  • @AZALI00013
    @AZALI00013 Рік тому +5

    this channel is great :0 :0
    thank you so much for making these !!! :)

  • @jimi02468
    @jimi02468 Рік тому +4

    By checking with Wolfram Alpha the answer for the fourth power seems to be (pi*sinh(pi))/(-cos(sqrt(2)*pi)+cosh(sqrt(2)*pi)). I need a video explaining how you find that.

  • @Farmpy
    @Farmpy Рік тому +11

    I like this channel

  • @localidiot4078
    @localidiot4078 Рік тому +19

    Before i finish the video, i think the infinite product will be 0, because you have an infinite amount of numbers below 1, making each product slightly smaller over and over, thus approaching 0.

    • @localidiot4078
      @localidiot4078 Рік тому +16

      I was wrong =)

    • @tfg601
      @tfg601 Рік тому +2

      NO THAT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE, BECAUSE THEN IT WILL BE INFINITY/INFINITY

    • @localidiot4078
      @localidiot4078 Рік тому +1

      @@tfg601 well, it turns out i was wrong, but that is what a limit is. Infinity isn't a number you get to, its a process. ever step contains finite numbers, we will never get to infinity. By the end of the process we will have .6666 because everything cancels out. don't think of it as literally infinity, think of it as what happens as the numbers get closer to infinity, they never will be infinite.

    • @tfg601
      @tfg601 Рік тому

      @@localidiot4078 yeah I know 👍

    • @givrally
      @givrally Рік тому +2

      A fun tip for next time is that convergence of infinite products can very easily be reduced to convergence of infinite series.
      Step 1. If you have negatives you're either going to 0 or doomed to diverge so you might as well look at the absolute value.
      Step 2. Take the logarithm of the product. That product becomes a sum, and the terms just become their logarithms.
      Step 3. Your terms can almost always be reduced to 1+1/(something that goes to 0), do that and then use the taylor series of ln(1+x), and the sum's convergence is now very easy to prove.
      Conclusion : If it diverges to -infinity, then the product probably goes to 0. If it diverges to +infinity, then the product does as well. If it goes to some value, then the product might go to the exponential, it might be close, or it might not be at all, but we know it converges.
      The proof to all of that is a bit more complicated but yeah, if you have the infinite product of 1 + something(n), it has the same convergence as the sum of something(n), except in the case of -infinity where it goes to 0 instead. Very useful to evaluate things like this product on the go, because the sum of -2/(n^3+1) very obviously converges so that product converges to something we know is not 0.

  • @esajpsasipes2822
    @esajpsasipes2822 Рік тому +10

    "one step"

  • @nightglide_
    @nightglide_ Рік тому +5

    Step 1. Find it.

  • @scott_the_engineer
    @scott_the_engineer Рік тому +4

    I love this kind of math.

  • @asparkdeity8717
    @asparkdeity8717 Рік тому +1

    Very easy question, bog standard method of telescoping over an infinite product

    • @Qermaq
      @Qermaq Рік тому

      you live in a bog

  • @R2_D8
    @R2_D8 Рік тому

    Criminal how this cannel only has 12400 subs

  • @HoSza1
    @HoSza1 Рік тому +2

    keyword: telescoping product

  • @lovelynarhe
    @lovelynarhe Рік тому +2

    In the start, you took the value of n from 2, why not 1?

    • @waleedbinshabbir1542
      @waleedbinshabbir1542 Рік тому +7

      well if n was 1 we would have had 0/2 as our first term and anything multiplied by 0 would be 0, thus a very boring answer

  • @ThsHunt
    @ThsHunt Рік тому +1

    So underrated

  • @Farmpy
    @Farmpy Рік тому +1

    Do you study computer science or math ?

  • @runslo2066
    @runslo2066 Рік тому

    Nice video

  • @galacticdragon9841
    @galacticdragon9841 Рік тому

    nice video!

  • @vinita3890
    @vinita3890 Рік тому

    2/3

  • @gjproductions9337
    @gjproductions9337 Рік тому

    Easy, 1^3 -1=0, therefore, the answer is 0

    • @not_vinkami
      @not_vinkami Рік тому +1

      Except there's no such term called (1³-1)/(1³+1)

  • @lil_iberia
    @lil_iberia Рік тому

    Answer = 0

    • @HatterTobias
      @HatterTobias Рік тому +1

      Only correct if it starts from (1³-1)/(1³+1)
      However we're starting from (2³-1)/(2³+1)

  • @marrus9366
    @marrus9366 Рік тому +1

    Etc is pronounced et-cetera, not exedra (but nice video for the rest :)

    • @qcard76
      @qcard76 Рік тому +1

      It’s just his accent lol

    • @tompeled6193
      @tompeled6193 Рік тому +2

      shuddup grammer notsee!!!

    • @Alians0108
      @Alians0108 Рік тому +1

      @@tompeled6193 Nah, it's genuinely good advice