They will only change when they are personally taken to civil court and not by their system of get the tax payer to pay out. They are not employed by the police, therefore liable for their own actions.
Sue them, make a civil claim against each officer, then they can't claim qualified immunity, each officer will have to pay the court costs and legal costs plus what ever money you get awarded for illegal detainment and illegal search. Also sue the Chief Constable as a seperate claim.
I hope by now the whole of the country are getting fed up of police abusing legislation just to intimidate everyday people doing nothing, whilst actually doing nothing about serious crime absolute waste of taxpayer money
They will abuse 43 section 60 then they will be withdrawn because of abuse and replaced with new sections to abuse The search is important and as many of them as possible to add intimidation ,but the report cannot be generated the victim has to go to a corporation building and request one They are taking the piss
I have seen this. First the officer said it was a stop& account , because he would not cooperate ( Rice v Connolly) they decide to search under section 60. People can be searched under these powers when senior officers reasonably believe that serious violence may take place in an area.
It is absolutely incredible how offensive it must be perceived when the police, as here, surrounds a person and conducts a personal investigation. Their reason was that they were not told the person's name. Of course, it found nothing, which they obviously showed well. It was a demonstration of power, they wanted to prove that they could, that they were the ones who decided. Fair or not. I hope this man will sue these officers and I hope many will expose these criminal officers for what they are. The good cops cover up the bad, so are there good and bad?
The whole Good Cop / Bad Cop question can be disposed of much more decisively. We need not enumerate what proportion of cops appears to be good or listen to someone's anecdote about his uncle Charlie, an allegedly good cop. We need only consider the following: A cop's job is to enforce the laws, all of them; Many of the laws are manifestly unjust, and some are even cruel and wicked; Therefore every cop has to agree to act as an enforcer for laws that are manifestly unjust or even cruel and wicked. There are no good cops. - Robert Higgs
It's about time that police officers have to again carry paper search records and not be allowed to search if they haven't got any, why should the public have to put up with being searched and then have to go out of their way to get a record of the search.
I tend to think this was a little exercise to reacquaint these senior staff members with the street, and as you can see, it played out exactly as expected. A conversation around being out in public, during Covid, turns into a section 60 and a search. Now, why doesn"t that surprise me ?
Even if a Section 60 was in place, which could be in doubt, it was still an unlawful search. The officer who conducted the search failed to follow the correct procedures. The others also failed to identify until after the search and only when repeatedly asked. Also none stated that they had put on their BWV. Again the Met simply cannot get even the basics right.
And so it continues you think they would have learned by now but they never will till there is some consequences to their actions it’s time you for a private prosecution to be possible
A Section 60 is a power given by an Inspector or above which allows police officers to stop and search anyone in a specific area without needing to have reasonable grounds. It is granted under Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
@@offwiththefairies77 They just have to pronounce it. This Act is described as "the restriction and reduction of existing rights, clamping down on unlicensed rave parties, and greater penalties for certain "anti-social" behaviours". It was the response to the Castlemorton Common Festival, Malvern, Worcestershire in 1992 with SpiralTribe and such. New Age environmental whatevers.
You could tell yhey really wanted to do him with a section 5 public order offence because of his language. However I believe they wouldn't be able to make it stand as it was a reaction to their own actions.
The name "Nobody Poor Audits" reflects the channel's mission to ensure justice and fair treatment for everyone, particularly in interactions between police and citizens. It signifies the commitment to preventing anyone from being left without a voice or support, promoting awareness and accountability in society👍
Have two broken teeth susppected broken arm and police 😊asked husband if he wanted me charged dumped me in hospital and because his dog was unwell l am 67 female god help us all
They will only change when they are personally taken to civil court and not by their system of get the tax payer to pay out.
They are not employed by the police, therefore liable for their own actions.
And then cops complain that nobody respects the police. I WONDER WHY.
This is a 'profoundly unsettling situation' for someone to be in! And on the strength of this an unjustifiable one!!
Yes this is troubling! & thanks.
How to make the police look stupid?
Let them talk.
Pathetic policing as per usual but it's just the norm for these 🤡🤡🤡 these days.
The police are an Occupation Force, NOT a police Service.
Four divvy cops to stop and search a lone cyclist. Says everything about the crap we have to pay for as police.
Sue them, make a civil claim against each officer, then they can't claim qualified immunity, each officer will have to pay the court costs and legal costs plus what ever money you get awarded for illegal detainment and illegal search. Also sue the Chief Constable as a seperate claim.
We should set up a training scheme for officers before we let them loose on the public!
Passive aggressive meter off the rails
Nothing passive about that at all.
I hope this man filed a claim and won
Not called 'the filth' for nothing.
You must sue HNK.
I thought authorisation from an inspector or above was needed for a section 60 to be used, was there one present?
I hope by now the whole of the country are getting fed up of police abusing legislation just to intimidate everyday people doing nothing, whilst actually doing nothing about serious crime absolute waste of taxpayer money
They will abuse 43 section 60 then they will be withdrawn because of abuse and replaced with new sections to abuse The search is important and as many of them as possible to add intimidation ,but the report cannot be generated the victim has to go to a corporation building and request one They are taking the piss
Police gang. W⚓️s.
Auditing Britain recent one on Brummie Popo they were saying their brief is to audit scooters like these.
When they ask if you have anything in your pockets that could hurt them, I would tell them that they search me at their own risk.
Just doing my job .. where have we heard that before .. no excuse .. Nuremerg 2.0 ...
It makes you wonder where those coppers live and what their neighbors think of them 🤔
I thought you won against the nazis
They fooled us.
@@nospoon4799 seems like it these days doesn’t it
A lot of people are thinking we fought the wrong enemy.
They are lying and abusing their authority they need to be held to account sue them
Their time will come!
I have seen this. First the officer said it was a stop& account , because he would not cooperate ( Rice v Connolly) they decide to search under section 60. People can be searched under these powers when senior officers reasonably believe that serious violence may take place in an area.
What a tragic state of affairs
He is brilliant with them
stop and account what laws that
It is absolutely incredible how offensive it must be perceived when the police, as here, surrounds a person and conducts a personal investigation. Their reason was that they were not told the person's name. Of course, it found nothing, which they obviously showed well.
It was a demonstration of power, they wanted to prove that they could, that they were the ones who decided. Fair or not. I hope this man will sue these officers and I hope many will expose these criminal officers for what they are.
The good cops cover up the bad, so are there good and bad?
The whole Good Cop / Bad Cop question can be disposed of much more decisively. We need not enumerate what proportion of cops appears to be good or listen to someone's anecdote about his uncle Charlie, an allegedly good cop.
We need only consider the following:
A cop's job is to enforce the laws, all of them;
Many of the laws are manifestly unjust, and some are even cruel and wicked;
Therefore every cop has to agree to act as an enforcer for laws that are manifestly unjust or even cruel and wicked.
There are no good cops. - Robert Higgs
Reminds me of a clowm bus they cram all the clowns in !
It's about time that police officers have to again carry paper search records and not be allowed to search if they haven't got any, why should the public have to put up with being searched and then have to go out of their way to get a record of the search.
100% agree. The public should not be inconvenienced, especially if nothing unlawful has been discovered.
They take the piss when they ask you to be courteous when they are treating you like a criminal
We’re police, we don’t cause confrontation 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Good to see your back in the saddle anyway. I've been biggin ya to all and sundry haha☺☺
Brilliant. That's the way to talk to em.
Wow
Whether you agree C19 was serious or not nobody should have been told 'they can't go outside'.
ACAB ✊🏽✊🏻
erm what the sigma
I tend to think this was a little exercise to reacquaint these senior staff members with the street, and as you can see, it played out exactly as expected. A conversation around being out in public, during Covid, turns into a section 60 and a search. Now, why doesn"t that surprise me ?
"We can't do our jobs from two meters"
Hmmmm 🤔
Even if a Section 60 was in place, which could be in doubt, it was still an unlawful search. The officer who conducted the search failed to follow the correct procedures. The others also failed to identify until after the search and only when repeatedly asked. Also none stated that they had put on their BWV. Again the Met simply cannot get even the basics right.
Theyre so bothered about him out with covid but wont give him 2 metres or wear ppe......
He don’t/have to listen to their bullshit. He isn’t going anywhere.
Well if he catches covid from you then he will be suing you for millions
If you are stopped under a section 60 get on your phone and do a search, its not unknown for police to lie about a section 60 being in place.
Did they find his ID? That's what they were looking for. It's going to be a lot worse when AI kicks in!!!
And so it continues you think they would have learned by now but they never will till there is some consequences to their actions it’s time you for a private prosecution to be possible
A Section 60 is a power given by an Inspector or above which allows police officers to stop and search anyone in a specific area without needing to have reasonable grounds. It is granted under Section 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
Was the inspector there?
@@offwiththefairies77 They just have to pronounce it. This Act is described as "the restriction and reduction of existing rights, clamping down on unlicensed rave parties, and greater penalties for certain "anti-social" behaviours". It was the response to the Castlemorton Common Festival, Malvern, Worcestershire in 1992 with SpiralTribe and such. New Age environmental whatevers.
Ginger Bob head 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 gonna have to give you a follow 😂😂😂😂😂😂🎉
What vile oxygen thieves in uniform 👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻
You could tell yhey really wanted to do him with a section 5 public order offence because of his language. However I believe they wouldn't be able to make it stand as it was a reaction to their own actions.
I'm howling here lmfao they got a Black man to use a section 60 so the young man that got stopped couldn't moan about being racial profiled.
🤣😂
1935 all over again
Looks like they picked you out for some rookie training and you are the the lucky one
We live in a police state. Get used to it.
Arrr…. Back in the good old days 🙄
How is it being abused? If a section 60 is in place in the area then it allows them to stop and search without any suspicion doesn't it?
What's nobody poor please explain I'm Australian
The name "Nobody Poor Audits" reflects the channel's mission to ensure justice and fair treatment for everyone, particularly in interactions between police and citizens. It signifies the commitment to preventing anyone from being left without a voice or support, promoting awareness and accountability in society👍
alright mate is it ok to feature this video on my channel? full credit in the video and links to your video and channel in the description.
Sure m8, no problem. Although I also shared this as it wasn't my footage. 👍
@@nobodypoor ok mate. Is there a link to the person how sent it so I can link them as well or are they want to stay private?
Honestly m8, it was sent to me via email. Don't know who's it is.
@@nobodypoor ok mate thanks for letting me use the video
Y/W 👍
Bacon bits again 😅
And thats why l will never help a cop
it's my job to violate your rights - that's what he meant by "it's my job" - what an absolute douche
Stop and account hasnt been used for years
Nonce gang
Have two broken teeth susppected broken arm and police 😊asked husband if he wanted me charged dumped me in hospital and because his dog was unwell l am 67 female god help us all
All of them recording didn’t here anybody tell you
Acts apply to persons not the living man or woman common law is the real law
Unfit for purpose
Bad cops
🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷🐷
We just want a chat with you,,, well I don't want one with you bye...
Clowns
What did you do? Look at them with your eyes 😂
These police are nothing but bullies, four of then on there money is a joke