Best Stud Finder? $262 Bosch vs $10 CH Hanson vs 9 Other Wall Stud Scanners! Let's find out!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10 тис.

  • @ProjectFarm
    @ProjectFarm  2 місяці тому +7

    Here's the list of products reviewed. More details in the video description. Thank you!
    CH Hanson: amzn.to/3kWnnIv
    Bosch GMS 120: amzn.to/36hP76F
    Bosch D-TECT 120: amzn.to/2GjgWAc
    DeWalt: amzn.to/3if3ZFe
    Franklin T6: amzn.to/3n0iS1M
    Franklin T13: amzn.to/30bsYTF
    Zircon: amzn.to/30cuBQJ
    Stanley: amzn.to/3cyGjdF
    Perlesmith: amzn.to/30f5D3c
    JAXWQ: amzn.to/36cDr4M

    • @DantalionNl
      @DantalionNl 2 місяці тому +2

      Am I blind or is the tacklife missing?

    • @nazgu1
      @nazgu1 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@DantalionNlIt is missing.

    • @VizziniAnthony
      @VizziniAnthony 24 дні тому +3

      Would love a new video on this! I'm sure stud finders have changed in 4 years, and I still haven't found one that I trust all the time.

  • @914050
    @914050 4 роки тому +1032

    "I went ahead and built a test wall."
    I appreciate how much work goes into these videos.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +73

      Thanks so much!

    • @SuperSkittles1996
      @SuperSkittles1996 4 роки тому +38

      Pretty awesome that he actually went ahead and textured and painted it! Dont know any other youtuber willing to put as much work into his projects as Prjoect Farm!

    • @jmac1099
      @jmac1099 4 роки тому +10

      That’s was pretty awesome, just wish he would have done some with insulation in the stud bays, especially the foil backed stuff

    • @Auto209
      @Auto209 4 роки тому +2

      J Mac true I forgot about that

    • @TarmanTheChampion
      @TarmanTheChampion 4 роки тому +1

      @@SuperSkittles1996 took the words out of my mouth haha hes always above and beyond

  • @TheOmnisProject
    @TheOmnisProject 3 роки тому +1153

    As a contractor trying to stay up to date with changing tech, and making sure to get the best bang for my buck I have to say…I’m watching more and more of your videos, and the more I watch the more I realize you are the best on UA-cam. No filler, no bs, no sponsors, just straight honest to God info…and man, they’re really helping a lot
    Thanks! Keep up the good work

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  3 роки тому +61

      Thanks, will do!

    • @steveh7108
      @steveh7108 3 роки тому +26

      And he keeps his comedy short and sweet.
      A short wise crack or a comical moment is fine every now and then.
      He stays focused on the objective and not the entertainment.
      Leave that for the Discovery Channel.
      They have a knack for turning the most interesting reality shows into ridiculous comedy in a blink of an eye. I.e. Pawn Stars, Pickers, American Restoration, etc.

    • @Itisinthehand
      @Itisinthehand 2 роки тому +2

      Thanks

    • @turbotension
      @turbotension 2 роки тому +17

      They're helping a lot? We're gonna test that!

    • @jordanrobertson7824
      @jordanrobertson7824 2 роки тому +3

      Check out aVe and his BOLTR videos

  • @InfernoPhilM
    @InfernoPhilM 4 роки тому +3079

    My super power is the ability to miss every stud, regardless of tools or equipment. It’s pretty impressive.

    • @takemechrome2291
      @takemechrome2291 4 роки тому +122

      Is it weird to have the same super power?

    • @heyitsme9480
      @heyitsme9480 4 роки тому +51

      U have that too I always found it really useful especially when ur trying to put up something

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +179

      lol Thanks for watching.

    • @dimesonhiseyes9134
      @dimesonhiseyes9134 4 роки тому +49

      I think we were both exposed to the same burst of gama radiation because I have the same power.

    • @danedralin8064
      @danedralin8064 4 роки тому +30

      Would have liked to see the Walabot

  • @xaviermalagon6478
    @xaviermalagon6478 11 місяців тому +47

    You sir saved me hours of reading unqualified opinions online! Your testing methods and results were perfect for answering my performance based questions! Thank you From Ohio!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  11 місяців тому +2

      You are welcome! Glad to hear!

    • @nilleftw
      @nilleftw 9 місяців тому +6

      I've read numerous reviews calling the Bosch GMS 120 a piece of shit that can't detect anything. This is why I always check here for reviews before trusting random strangers.

  • @cornbadge998
    @cornbadge998 4 роки тому +504

    “We’re gonna test that” I swear I get so excited when he says that

  • @electronicsNmore
    @electronicsNmore 4 роки тому +1772

    Wow, you put a lot of time and money into making this video to help people choose the right scanner. Thank you for the excellent testing! A++

    • @EazyFieldsports
      @EazyFieldsports 4 роки тому +92

      New here? Aha. That’s what he does best. One of the best channels on youtube. Wouldn’t think of buying anything without checking to see if he’s tested it first

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +86

      You're welcome!

    • @TheMightyAgency
      @TheMightyAgency 4 роки тому +35

      @@EazyFieldsports What I appreciate the most is the kind of tests that he has to wait a long time to get the results, like exposing zip ties to the outside for a year. That takes a lot of planning and commitment.
      Next test, have a kid (I know he has a few) and report back 18 years later to tell us if it's worth it :)

    • @411Adidas
      @411Adidas 4 роки тому +5

      @@ProjectFarm I own the zircon HD900 and you tested the A100.
      Can you compare all the zircon models

    • @411Adidas
      @411Adidas 4 роки тому +2

      @Throw Stone fr hes been ding this a while now. Everything I buy is based off of PF tests and reviews.

  • @sprtjnke
    @sprtjnke 4 роки тому +564

    I can locate pipes, wires and conduit with a drill bit every time I drill a hole in sheet rock. Studs seem to elude me every time.

    • @acexxxoasis
      @acexxxoasis 4 роки тому +41

      Same here I can literally drill every half inch for 36 inches and still miss the studs lol

    • @DemonOfFury
      @DemonOfFury 4 роки тому +3

      😂

    • @mesanders1113
      @mesanders1113 4 роки тому +17

      I know it seems a bit exaggerated but its closer to the truth than most realize

    • @imtylerb
      @imtylerb 4 роки тому +1

      Agreed!

    • @Tangobaldy
      @Tangobaldy 4 роки тому +8

      @@acexxxoasis you should see the mess of my ceiling. Yep 12 holes until I found the stud. Was the cheapest most accurate way ever.

  • @seishino
    @seishino 2 роки тому +202

    If you decide to do a follow-up, we have really terrible walls here in the Northeast. I’d love to see a worst-case scenario test of how well these perform on horsehair plaster walls, as well as how many layers of drywall on top of each other there can be before they can no longer find a stud.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  2 роки тому +52

      Thanks for the suggestion.

    • @SilverScreenMassage
      @SilverScreenMassage 2 роки тому +35

      Seconded! As a handyman I am constantly up against old plaster and multiple layers of drywall.

    • @samueltomlinson1897
      @samueltomlinson1897 2 роки тому +22

      @@ProjectFarm Third'd (?) - I run into a lot of Plaster and Lath walls in NE Ohio, and my higher-end Zircon works maybe 30% of the time.

    • @ChrisElvis
      @ChrisElvis 2 роки тому +10

      I'd also love some plaster wall testing, I really need to find a reliable finder that works.

    • @ianbutler1983
      @ianbutler1983 2 роки тому +13

      I see people on TV finding studs through ceramic tile and fiberglass shower surrounds. Call me skeptical, Could you add this to your testing? Thanks, love your channel.

  • @jalawialotaibi6639
    @jalawialotaibi6639 4 роки тому +78

    am I the only one finding this channel a great place to look for new products I never head of? 😄 excellent job man . big fan of yours

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +5

      Awesome! Thank you!

    • @actionjksn
      @actionjksn 4 роки тому +3

      Yes you are the only one in the world to find that.

    • @airborneleads1981
      @airborneleads1981 4 роки тому +3

      Literally project farm reviews/ test and analysis carry the most weight when buying new tools, products etc. The effort he puts into every review to give you an absolute understanding on how every product performs is unreal.

  • @2010ngojo
    @2010ngojo 4 роки тому +488

    This guy just builds a spare wall for testing tools. Some dedication there.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +43

      Thanks for watching!

    • @WayneTheBoatGuy
      @WayneTheBoatGuy 3 роки тому +16

      And he painted it a nice blue!

    • @WikkedR1
      @WikkedR1 3 роки тому +33

      A wall? Pssh! He does testing where he lets the product/item being tested sit for weeks, months and even a year. THAT’S dedication, my friend!
      He’s entertaining without coming off as a know-it-all, his tests are about as scientific as any lay person could get without an actual “lab”and he lets the results speak for themselves with very little opinion or interjection. Best channel on YT.

    • @ChrisEpler
      @ChrisEpler 3 роки тому +6

      @@WayneTheBoatGuy Textured, and let it dry for 5 days!

    • @ChrisEpler
      @ChrisEpler 3 роки тому +2

      @@ProjectFarm Love your tests, not sure it helped me, still scratching my head to decide but appreciate your videos!

  • @zacharyducasse8959
    @zacharyducasse8959 4 роки тому +150

    I love this channel! Im 19 and work in a hardware store as a student job and because of these videos, im able to inform customers more efficiently about which products are better. Thanks!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +20

      That is awesome! Thanks for watching.

  • @joevanseeters2873
    @joevanseeters2873 Рік тому +74

    Without a doubt you are the best channel on UA-cam for honest, thorough, and no "BS" or filler to your videos. I love watching all your tool and equipment reviews and they are very helpful when trying to buy a tool or piece of equipment related to the garage or home. I am also a car detailing enthusiast and a lot of your videos relate to that endeavor as well so thanks for what you do sir and for bringing this information to the masses out here in UA-cam land watching these informative video tool and product reviews. Happy Holidays and looking forward to your videos in the future!

  • @rheeno6600
    @rheeno6600 4 роки тому +400

    i dont even have drywall, and will never used this product in my country, why i'm watching it? damn, you have a good video presentation to get my attention to watched it by curiousity.. keep the good job

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +28

      Thanks so much!

    • @Liftium
      @Liftium 3 роки тому +6

      Yeah same :) we only have concrete and blocks

    • @Sunnbuzz
      @Sunnbuzz 3 роки тому +2

      @@Liftium Russia ?

    • @aBoogivogi
      @aBoogivogi 3 роки тому +8

      The feature to test for PVC pipes and wires work through other materials as well. In fact I have never seen Bosch marketing mention drywalls. Here both these Bosch products are just marketed as a stud finder period.

    • @flewwasse
      @flewwasse 3 роки тому +1

      Same pfp

  • @mac11380
    @mac11380 4 роки тому +6774

    Best stud finder was my ex wife when I was out of town.

  • @billharm6006
    @billharm6006 4 роки тому +59

    I admire the simplicity, applicability, and unbiased nature of your testing. You put a lot into these tests in terms of both mental and physical effort. Glad I found your channel.

  • @robertkeener2841
    @robertkeener2841 2 роки тому +42

    You are my go-to for tool, glue, etc. comparisons! I really appreciate your consistent scientific method to compare things in multiple different ways (and multiple times for repeatability (esp with the glue review)). I know it takes effort to set it all up, but I don't know of any more thorough reviewer/tester out there. Thanks very much!

  • @ddtddt8493
    @ddtddt8493 4 роки тому +141

    As usual well done, professional, never boring and quick pace editing. You’re good dude. Very good job.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +13

      I appreciate that!

    • @SlurpTheFoxHole
      @SlurpTheFoxHole 4 роки тому +7

      Good? He's the reason youtube was reinvented. The man needs a beer.

  • @CaptOrbit
    @CaptOrbit 4 роки тому +118

    I wouldn't necessarily even mind seeing another round with different variants from the same manufacturer. I'll give you an example you go into Home Depot to pick up a stud finder and there must be a half a dozen different types from Zircon alone.
    How much does price make a difference within the same brand name? We got a little bit of a sample of that with Bosch but I wouldn't mind seeing more.
    Another great video! Thank you for all the time and effort you put in.

    • @JoeSmith-kj6wx
      @JoeSmith-kj6wx 4 роки тому +3

      I bought a Zircon StudSensor e40 on sale a few years ago.
      After watching this video, I wonder how well the live electric warning works.

    • @charlieh115
      @charlieh115 4 роки тому +3

      I have a Zircon... model number not at my fingertips now, but it was the $40ish version. Has been incredibly accurate including finding live wires.

    • @JoeSmith-kj6wx
      @JoeSmith-kj6wx 4 роки тому +1

      I think I paid around $10, and saved about $5 or $6.

    • @Iosis6
      @Iosis6 4 роки тому +1

      I've owned 2 different Zircon units and neither could find the studs in my walls. Its maddening. Asked a buddy to borrow his which was a Zircon as well and his was junk too.

    • @ThatKiltedGuyDIY
      @ThatKiltedGuyDIY 4 роки тому +4

      BIG TIP - I’ve been in construction most of my life and I’m 59 now. So I’ve owned a lot of stud finder’s and after going through electronic warfare training in the military, I finally understood how they work so I put out a video about it and it is exploding on my channel because it’s helping so many people. Just search my channel for how to use a stud finder and you should find it.

  • @floorpizza8074
    @floorpizza8074 4 роки тому +32

    This has rapidly become one of my favorite UA-cam channels. Not often will you find a content creator that not only provides fantastic content, but still takes the time to respond to comments, especially when the channel has over a million subs!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +6

      Wow, thank you!

    • @djony10
      @djony10 4 роки тому +2

      Same here, anything I buy I check with this channel first to see if WE HAVE TESTED THAT

  • @reamrkj1125
    @reamrkj1125 2 роки тому +69

    I was a maintenance tech for several years. Personally, I love the C.H. Hanson. It will find copper against the wall. Its the only one that will stay on the wall when it finds a screw. I like it alot better than the electronic ones. 100% accuracy and it's cheap. I've had the same one for years. It's attached to the roof of my truck and never moves. I've never had to replace batteries.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  2 роки тому +6

      Tanks for sharing.

    • @andrewjohnson9531
      @andrewjohnson9531 2 роки тому +4

      I have the Hanson as well, to supplement the Zircon. I often use them both simultaneously.

    • @nhardman
      @nhardman 2 роки тому

      I like the Hanson too. It’s a little annoying having to find the screws but it’s dead on.

    • @Kinosec-10
      @Kinosec-10 7 місяців тому

      Same- love the Hanson. Small, reliable and no batteries or calibrating to mess with

    • @BjarniArnason
      @BjarniArnason 2 дні тому

      I have one too and it's usually my first go to... however, the inherent problem with it that can't be avoided is that you are assuming that the drywall screws/nails are actually centered on the stud, which is absolutely not always the case.

  • @chillcloud9
    @chillcloud9 4 роки тому +31

    I'd be very curious to see how walbot or similar smart phone wall scanners would do

  • @waynesanders1406
    @waynesanders1406 4 роки тому +153

    I've always found the best stud finder is in the bathroom above the sink.

  • @HFG207
    @HFG207 4 роки тому +120

    I’m not sure how you’d test them, but how about shop hand cleaners like Fast Orange, Lava, etc?

  • @CrazyDave-GP2
    @CrazyDave-GP2 Рік тому +3

    I love that Zircon, been using them for several years, I've got one in my home toolbox and one on my work truck and it's never let me down. The only time I ever hit a wire with a drill was when I didn't grab it off the truck. Thanks for the amazing videos!

  • @ColeSpolaric
    @ColeSpolaric 4 роки тому +69

    Let's see the most accurate laser levels and laser measurers!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +12

      Great video idea! Thank you

    • @ThatOddGarage
      @ThatOddGarage 4 роки тому +1

      I just mentioned carpentry levels! Let’s combine the two!

    • @ColeSpolaric
      @ColeSpolaric 4 роки тому +1

      @@ThatOddGarage it be interesting to see if an empire level is just as good as a Stabila

  • @ixionn563
    @ixionn563 4 роки тому +124

    As someone who has wall mounted a lot of televisions, speakers and shelves, I would definitely say Zircon is the best overall. I've got an older Zircon unit, I just find the edges, mark the center, it's never missed once.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +16

      Thanks for the feedback.

    • @David.....
      @David..... 4 роки тому +7

      Same here...my dad has a 15 year old unit...I bought a zircon 4 years ago....both work fantasic.

    • @JimYeats
      @JimYeats 4 роки тому +5

      Agree. I have the basic Zircon model that just has a light that tells you where the stud edges are. No idea how you could get a better and simpler product for what it cost ($10 bucks maybe?).

    • @scottstewart9154
      @scottstewart9154 4 роки тому +3

      Me too love my Zircon, but also appreciate the franklin for not having to calibrate it.

    • @whit6282
      @whit6282 4 роки тому +3

      Any luck with plaster?

  • @kangaroosekcie
    @kangaroosekcie 4 роки тому +47

    Hey can you test electric pressure washer?
    And how they hold up. I've killed a few if the smaller ones

  • @miramavensub
    @miramavensub 6 місяців тому +7

    I have a house with 145 Y.O. plaster walls with layers of paint and nonstandard stud depths + spacings,and 90% of stuff finders are totally useless at telling the Lathe vs. Stud or even seeing through the thickness of the plaster.
    It's a huge pain. Getting a deep dive test with some 1" thick plaster and 1/4" lathe walls would be WONDERFUL! It would also be a huge help to a LOT of us restorationists and owners of old colonial and Victorian homes (most of Philadelphia, NYC, Boston, Richmond, Alexandria, D.C., Charleston, Detroit, Buffalo, Memphis, &c.

  • @maninthecrowd8215
    @maninthecrowd8215 4 роки тому +64

    Great review, but hears a thought, many old homes have .75” of plaster over lath or .5” of plaster over blue board. I live in the latter and have never been able to find a stud finder that works well through thick plaster 😞😎

    • @AnthonySomes
      @AnthonySomes 4 роки тому +3

      Walabot plaster/concrete mode might work

    • @StevenBuchanan
      @StevenBuchanan 4 роки тому +2

      The Franklin T13 works great at my house. I have what is called Kal-Kote. It is a plaster type of product and cheap stud finders do not work for me.

    • @jimb032
      @jimb032 4 роки тому +1

      @@AnthonySomes never seen a challenge yet my Wallabot couldn't handle.

    • @jasonc3522
      @jasonc3522 4 роки тому +2

      After removing enough lath and plaster to make me consider changing careers and learning that forgotten trade just to save others from the removal process, there should be enough nails running up the studs that a good magnet can pick them up.

    • @narlycharley
      @narlycharley 4 роки тому +3

      My in laws have a 1856 farm house. Finding the true 2x4 solid oak studs is impossible without just cutting into it. Sucks.

  • @kylesonsalla7620
    @kylesonsalla7620 4 роки тому +120

    Have that Zircon, this test makes me happy with my decision to buy it a few years ago when I bought my house. Been working well ever since

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +7

      Glad to hear!

    • @thecloneguyz
      @thecloneguyz 3 роки тому +2

      Try the L550
      Best ever made!

    • @classyincali9151
      @classyincali9151 3 роки тому +1

      Seems to have been replaced with the A200 which is twice the price :(

    • @Rancid_Ninja
      @Rancid_Ninja 3 роки тому +1

      i520 is what I use, has switch for normal, deep scan, metal and ac scan

    • @erebostd
      @erebostd 3 роки тому +2

      If you ever tried to fix a wire you hit because your detector didn’t find it while your client (or your wife😁) yells at you, you’ll regret not buying the bosh. I went down that road and got the german thing some years after i had others 🙈..

  • @AbbreviatedReviews
    @AbbreviatedReviews 4 роки тому +27

    My recommendation is including a couple insulation types to see if they have any impact.

  • @lwilton
    @lwilton Рік тому +68

    Now what I'd like to see would be the same test again, but this time with old-style lath and plaster rather than drywall. My limited experience is the extra plaster density and wood lath make it so most stud finders either decide the whole wall is a stud, or decide there are no studs.

  • @martinpedersen4886
    @martinpedersen4886 4 роки тому +31

    It's like you are reading my mind at the moment with every test you make. All the tests i have been waiting for. Premium content!!

  • @adamtheroofer3659
    @adamtheroofer3659 4 роки тому +90

    I am GPR certified through GSSI for concrete scanning. I wouldn’t mind seeing a concrete scanning vid BTW! I used the GSSI structurescan mini to scan drywall with and it is super accurate! It’s made for concrete up to 16 inches deep and can do a grid scan for a 3D model of the scan. You can rent them instead of purchasing them because they are very pricey! But if you were wanting the most expensive scanner it may do the trick! Love the vids!

    • @Bluscream
      @Bluscream 4 роки тому

      -

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +21

      Great suggestion! Thank you.

    • @patrickjames3321
      @patrickjames3321 4 роки тому +2

      Milwaukee has one, very expensive too, I would love to see that too.

    • @MGSsancho
      @MGSsancho 4 роки тому

      @@patrickjames3321 I thought their's was discontinued years ago along wit h the bosch equivalent. I was under the impression the company that had the actual tech no longer wished to license it out to be rebranded anymore

    • @ninjazzrhythm400
      @ninjazzrhythm400 4 роки тому

      @@gander13189 damn, it must be using radiation for detection

  • @jameshanna8762
    @jameshanna8762 4 роки тому +220

    Can't believe he didn't do the 'Dad joke'. Admirable restraint!

    • @mraycgz
      @mraycgz 4 роки тому +44

      I can’t not point it at myself and say “ found one!”

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +24

      Thanks for watching!

    • @HariSeldon913
      @HariSeldon913 4 роки тому +17

      @@mraycgz I go the opposite direction - point it at my brother-in-law and say, "No reading."

    • @ninjamaster3453
      @ninjamaster3453 4 роки тому +5

      Well I can never get these to work because I set them off all the time 😆

    • @owenparker6651
      @owenparker6651 4 роки тому +3

      What a bunch! 😂

  • @SCHAUDENLUCAS
    @SCHAUDENLUCAS 3 роки тому +231

    There is one thing that a lot of people seem to miss when using the Bosch D-Tect 120: your second hand has to stay in contact with the wall while using the device. The manual says that and it makes a big difference. The only issue is: who reads manuals?

    • @Erutan409
      @Erutan409 2 роки тому +19

      Is it something to do with grounding some kind of signal coming from it?

    • @SCHAUDENLUCAS
      @SCHAUDENLUCAS 2 роки тому +6

      @@Erutan409 I guess so.

    • @StopTryingSoHard
      @StopTryingSoHard 2 роки тому +5

      That is my experience as well, also I’ve had any issues with it being off at all.

    • @gs4256
      @gs4256 2 роки тому +29

      @@Erutan409 Yes, its grounding of the unit, I was becoming really frustrated with both the GMS 120 & the D-Tect 120, but then I found out that certain wall coverings & paints seem to generate static when the scanner is moved across the surface, I place my free hand next to the unit as I move it across the surface, its stops the false positive readings (mostly incorrectly identified electrical cable).

    • @drscopeify
      @drscopeify 2 роки тому +4

      No you cannot ground it, the unit is plastic and Drywall/Sheetrock is not grounded. The unit uses a sonar sensor so by putting your hand you provide a boundary for the sonar but other units do not require this so it seems odd.

  • @jbhh79
    @jbhh79 4 роки тому +56

    I have both the most expensive Zircon that Lowes was selling 3 or 4 years ago (model?) and a Franklin T13. In everyday use the T13 kicks Zircon butt. But neither are any good for thicker walls, like tile or plaster, or at finding floor joist through finished floor... something I sometimes need to do. Find one that will find floor joist under a finished floor or studs through vinyl or Hardie board siding on the outside of a wall that doesn't break the bank and I would be interested! Thanks for the entertaining and informative work you do!

    • @rts3613
      @rts3613 4 роки тому

      I agree, the Franklin is a better tool, but has it's limitations.

    • @chrisv4640
      @chrisv4640 4 роки тому

      There is definitely something to be said for the no need for calibration if you use it very often, as I do. I will stick with my T13 until we get xray cameras.

    • @mkoshao
      @mkoshao 4 роки тому +1

      I don't know what you define as not breaking the bank aka what your budget is... But the Bosch d-tect 120 does everything you need. It detects up to a depth of 120mm / 12 cm / slightly under 5 inches

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +2

      Thanks for the video idea.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks for sharing.

  • @colinbois3554
    @colinbois3554 3 роки тому +71

    I've been using the Franklin T13 for a few years now. I've been very happy with it, and it's done much better than the two Zircons, a Stanley and a Black and Decker I have used in the past. I renovate houses for a living, so I use these things frequently. Thanks for the videos. I enjoy your channel a lot.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  3 роки тому +12

      You are welcome! Glad to hear!

    • @jboneill22
      @jboneill22 2 роки тому +3

      Great channel. You help us make good decisions.

    • @rickeykoga2312
      @rickeykoga2312 2 роки тому +4

      Franklin > every other stuff finder

    • @PongoXBongo
      @PongoXBongo 2 роки тому +2

      Would you recommend the Frankling T6 as a more affordable for option for homeowners/DIYers? Or is it better to pony up for significant benefit?

    • @BrilliantDesignOnline
      @BrilliantDesignOnline 2 роки тому +3

      @@PongoXBongo I have a T13 and it appears the T6 is just a shorter version: T13 is THE Best.

  • @davidp2888
    @davidp2888 4 роки тому +130

    If I bought every cool thing you reviewed I'd be a very poor man with a lot of cool stuff.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +72

      Hi David, lol. Yes, burnng a hole in my pocket, and I'll need to test "credit card finders" soon. Have a great week!

    • @LynnGryphon
      @LynnGryphon 4 роки тому +2

      Great for present shopping tho! 😁

    • @feikebanning532
      @feikebanning532 4 роки тому +1

      Speaking of the stuff, what do you do with the tested products when you're done? eBay?

  • @Enigma_V8
    @Enigma_V8 Рік тому +15

    I've had my Zircon A100 for over a decade and it's hands down the best for the money! For the features like deep scan and the "laser", accuracy and ease of use, I haven't found anything that can touch it for even double the money.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  Рік тому

      Thanks for sharing.

    • @MLTR-1995
      @MLTR-1995 10 місяців тому

      This video doubled down on my choice for years - Zircon 1100 from HomeDepot

  • @focusonthefocus
    @focusonthefocus 4 роки тому +134

    It would be hilarious if you also tested “guy who uses knuckle” vs stud finders...

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +24

      lol Thanks for the suggestion.

    • @macgyveratlarge2133
      @macgyveratlarge2133 4 роки тому +9

      Better get one of those "old school" carpenters for the test.

    • @lonewanderer3603
      @lonewanderer3603 4 роки тому +17

      It's a valid technique if you have a good ear.

    • @GabeMacDonnell
      @GabeMacDonnell 4 роки тому +3

      LoneWanderer360 only on wood studs w/ standard drywall, & if you're sure there's no live wires in your workspace.

    • @Francois_Dupont
      @Francois_Dupont 4 роки тому

      or tapping your hammer on the wall.

  • @sylviaknutcecily
    @sylviaknutcecily 4 роки тому +18

    There are different walls that I've encountered that REALLY make it challenging for the stud finders.
    - thicker drywall
    - 2 layers of drywall.
    - lath and plaster walls.
    - plaster over drywall.
    I hate most stud finders that I've used, but I find the Franklin to be the most helpful for the thicker walls, though they don't sense them perfectly either.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +2

      Thanks for sharing.

    • @-Viceroy-
      @-Viceroy- 4 роки тому +1

      Insulation behind the drywall is tricky for the stud detection.

  • @meshaneh8138
    @meshaneh8138 4 роки тому +7

    The comprehensive chart with your history of tested products is awesome! Thank you for your hard work and dedication to unbiased review.

  • @cuttheknot4781
    @cuttheknot4781 2 роки тому +9

    This fellow deserves every bit of whatever success he attains, here. He is extremely honorable in his ways and very thorough..

  • @BW-ze3mg
    @BW-ze3mg 4 роки тому +65

    Would like to see this same test done on lath and plaster walls.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +10

      Thanks for the suggestion.

    • @seannicholas6667
      @seannicholas6667 4 роки тому +9

      That's the real test. Finding the stud in drywall is easy. Lathe and plaster is a pain in the ass. Nothing really seems to work consistently

    • @Boemel
      @Boemel 4 роки тому +4

      i want a scanner to see a live wire located behind a brick wall.

    • @ivpu2465
      @ivpu2465 4 роки тому +1

      @@ProjectFarm this would be great

    • @harveywallbanger3123
      @harveywallbanger3123 4 роки тому +4

      I've lived in both kinds of houses. Unfortunate truth time: If you've got sheetrock walls, 99% of the stud finders will work instantly and identically (most people just bang on the wall). If you've got plaster and lathe, virtually everything is useless because the industry can't/won't make a cheap instrument that works on P&L.
      I've actually bought that exact model DeWalt in the past (along with several others) and all of them were completely or mostly useless on plaster and lathe. I ended up needing to borrow a professional model from a friend that was specifically rated to work on plaster & lath (MSRP $320).

  • @tylerrusty1122
    @tylerrusty1122 4 роки тому +386

    Manufacturers are gonna use "This product is Project Farm certified" someday.

    • @hallmarksdetailingllc8078
      @hallmarksdetailingllc8078 4 роки тому +13

      That video he did of the trim restoration products the "winner" of that test is already blasting it all over social media....

    • @tylerrusty1122
      @tylerrusty1122 4 роки тому +6

      @@hallmarksdetailingllc8078 I wouldn't do that product now because they won, and quality will probably come down now that they know they won.

    • @jayflorida
      @jayflorida 4 роки тому +3

      For sure. Look at Rotten Tomatoes and certified fresh on commercials.

    • @nunya___
      @nunya___ 4 роки тому +4

      50x more accurate than consumer's distort.

    • @k5ryannc
      @k5ryannc 4 роки тому +1

      @@nunya___ not many got this. Hilarious 😂

  • @12345.......
    @12345....... 4 роки тому +31

    Oooo. Looks like another good review. Costco sells a decent stud finder.

  • @b1skol95
    @b1skol95 2 роки тому +10

    Best channel on youtube by far. I own an old house with nothing but lath and plaster. Best results for finding studs is to detect the small finishing nails that are used to secure the laths. The magnetic ones work really well and was able to find them well with the cheap Amazon one using metal mode (Model TH510)

  • @firstname6165
    @firstname6165 4 роки тому +137

    There's something about how he says "We gone test that" makes me feel good, yes reveal the lies :)

  • @waiganliu9835
    @waiganliu9835 4 роки тому +104

    I’m curious if insulation would affect the stud finder especially if the whole stud bay is filled with spray foam.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +40

      Thanks for the video idea.

    • @brianjensen5200
      @brianjensen5200 4 роки тому +5

      Good question. I wonder what the inductive profile of spray foam would be when compared to structural wood.

    • @crforfreedom7407
      @crforfreedom7407 4 роки тому +3

      Yes. It has a DEFINATE impact on some studfinders rendering them useless depending on the machine and the density of the insulation.

    • @crforfreedom7407
      @crforfreedom7407 4 роки тому +7

      @@ProjectFarm If you do insulation, please consider using Rockwool as one of your insulation products. I've found that to be about the most flush and dense insulation out there if properly installed. It can definitely play havoc with some finders!
      That's why for just finding studs alone, I think the magnetics are the most reliable and easiest to use. But I'm fascinated at what they say a Walabot can do...... Hype or a real tool?

    • @crforfreedom7407
      @crforfreedom7407 4 роки тому +2

      @@brianjensen5200 CCF is very dense, but not always finished flush with the stud. To get max value, CCF can have a gap between the face of the CCF and the stud face. OCF can be shaved flush with the stud, but is more porous than CCF. Some used a blown recycled material for a time that was dampened and shaved flush, but I've only seen that used in the NE some time ago. CCF if people can afford it and Rockwool are favorites today along with the more cost effective traditionals......

  • @loganhaney9038
    @loganhaney9038 4 роки тому +15

    Hey, Project Farm I would be interested in watching an ultimate ratchet showdown. Compare Mac, Matco, Snap On, Pittsburgh, Tekton, Husky, Kobalt, Milwaukee, SK, and GearWrench. Thanks for all the hard work you do!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +6

      Great suggestion! Thank you.

    • @Tracked350Z
      @Tracked350Z 4 роки тому +1

      I thoroughly support this. However, I believe I know which will win...Snap-on followed by Harbor Freight.

    • @ThatOddGarage
      @ThatOddGarage 4 роки тому

      I like this one!

  • @frankp8854
    @frankp8854 Рік тому +2

    Whenever I have to buy a tool or some kind of equipment this is where I come to for real honest results ... THANK YOU

  • @tady5720
    @tady5720 4 роки тому +36

    How about the best hand file, tested on metals of different hardness.

    • @v.e.7236
      @v.e.7236 4 роки тому +1

      I pretty sure he's got a video of different files.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +4

      Thanks for the video idea.

    • @tady5720
      @tady5720 4 роки тому

      @@ProjectFarm another somewhat similar idea, wood rasps, with different types of wood of varying hardness, and maybe at the end a torture test with metals.

    • @jasonc3522
      @jasonc3522 4 роки тому +1

      @@tady5720 the thought of running wood rasps across metal is cringe inducing on several different levels.

  • @workisfun...2438
    @workisfun...2438 4 роки тому +12

    Modifying the test to include different depths of sheetrock and even lathe would be beneficial. As a remodeling contractor, a stud finder can lie to you pretty easily when scanning over different substrates. Great vid as usual my good man!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks so much!

    • @philotomybaar
      @philotomybaar 4 роки тому +2

      Agreed. As a contractor, I only care about finding studs. Plaster and lath is definitely the trickiest, while any drywall is child’s play. The t13 is the best and fastest for drywall, but I’ve yet to find a sensor that can reliably find studs and blocking behind 1” of plaster and lath. The gold standard would be a sensor that could find furring strips behind plaster on a masonry wall, like above a fireplace.
      Sometimes the easiest is to use a thermal camera to see the studs, but I understand a $6K flir camera is out of the range of homeowners.

  • @braydenmontgomery4689
    @braydenmontgomery4689 4 роки тому +98

    The best stud finder I’ve ever used is looking at where outlets or switches are, and or knocking on the wall. Lol
    Edit: I should add, it’s obviously not perfect and won’t find things like pipes or wires. It is a great method in a pinch though.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +10

      Thanks for sharing.

    • @RoRo20699
      @RoRo20699 4 роки тому +12

      'Old work' boxes laugh at you.

    • @deeeeeeps
      @deeeeeeps 4 роки тому +6

      As a very experienced trim carpenter I can agree. I can find a stud by this method faster than a detector. Register vents on the walls is another great indicator. There is always king studs next to windows.

    • @LynnGryphon
      @LynnGryphon 4 роки тому +1

      That's really cool

    • @deeeeeeps
      @deeeeeeps 4 роки тому +2

      @@corepuncher Knocking still works.

  • @sgt.marcuspstacker2287
    @sgt.marcuspstacker2287 Рік тому +1

    The fact you're objective and not biased or paid for any opinions you have all my respect, liked subscribed and will watch all test videos before I buy anything new!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  Рік тому

      Thanks! Thanks for watching and subscribing!

  • @stronkde
    @stronkde 4 роки тому +71

    "We're gonna test that" should be a Project Farm T-shirt.

  • @SuperDave-vj9en
    @SuperDave-vj9en 4 роки тому +31

    Project Farm.......
    I wished that you had tried the “Wallabot”, it detects everything behind a wall. It’s like looking through a wall and seeing studs, electrical, pipes, etc! It’s like an X-ray, only it uses rf signals.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +4

      Great suggestion. Thank you.

    • @SuperDave-vj9en
      @SuperDave-vj9en 4 роки тому

      @Project Farm
      I misspelled it, it’s actually Walabot. Google it and it explains the process of seeing through a hard surface. Wow, they have really dropped in price! Thanks, and love your show!

    • @markkayser426
      @markkayser426 4 роки тому +2

      Walabot fails on plaster and lathe in oooold houses. We have one at work and for testing brought it home to test. Works great on drywall though.

    • @hbracerx
      @hbracerx 4 роки тому +2

      I'd like to see this as well...

    • @philipwilson308
      @philipwilson308 4 роки тому

      @@markkayser426 I have an old house with lathe and plaster walls and bought a Walabot to 'see' into the walls. I was quite disappointed that it didn't work as I saw nothing in their advertising noting otherwise. I do see that they now have a model that can look into lathe and plaster walls but I haven't bought one as I still have a bitter taste in my mouth from my experience with the first one I bought. That and I have paneling over the plaster and worry that will interfere.
      A buddy of mine with plaster walls said that he has had good luck using a zircon in deep scan mode to find studs, although the wire finding ability of the walabot was the biggest selling point for me initially.

  • @garycarpenter2932
    @garycarpenter2932 4 роки тому +26

    being a carpenter all my life, even before i got into the trade.. it doesn't matter the stud finder i tried to use.. the darn things just kept beeping as soon as i picked one up.. :D

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +2

      Thanks for sharing.

    • @lawrencerodeback
      @lawrencerodeback 4 роки тому +5

      I don't care who you are, that's funny

    • @boots7859
      @boots7859 4 роки тому +1

      You may have an over-abundance of hemato-crit. Consider donating blood more often to test.
      Will be waiting for your results.

  • @useruser400
    @useruser400 2 місяці тому

    Came to check out which stud finders actually work. Was not disappointed.
    I just dumped my Crapsman stud finder and bought a Zircon.
    THANK YOU!!!! Excellent scientific process. Solid recommendations. Love this channel.

  • @joeldeutscher7077
    @joeldeutscher7077 2 роки тому +79

    If you ever decide to redo this test (though it'd be a lot of work), it'd be nice to test these against traditional lath-and-plaster walls as that's the real ultimate test of any stud finder (and for those of us with old houses, it'd be a godsend to find one that actually works!).

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  2 роки тому +15

      Thanks for the suggestion.

    • @avwholesomegamer
      @avwholesomegamer 2 роки тому +17

      Straight up I got so frustrated with my lathe and plaster walls I just bought a scope. I drill one hole, stick in the scope, turn on its light, and because our walls are hollow - I can visually see everything!

    • @DNomer
      @DNomer 2 роки тому +2

      Try the Bosch GMS 1220

    • @Mister_Brown
      @Mister_Brown Рік тому +5

      not that it's a practical suggestion in most cases but a decent sensitivity thermal camera makes an incredibly good studfinder, i've got some old firefighter cams i use for it and it works great when normal stud finders just don't work in my 1910's house, doesn't work as well with mildly insulated walls but does work well with super well insulated walls (the studs are just worse insulated instead of better)

  • @daverenken1371
    @daverenken1371 4 роки тому +56

    I’d be curious as to how they would preform in a plaster and lath format.

    • @eblackbrook
      @eblackbrook 4 роки тому +3

      Me too!

    • @nefariousyawn
      @nefariousyawn 4 роки тому +4

      Also walls with insulation in them.

    • @sjcorrea
      @sjcorrea 4 роки тому +5

      Exactly, double layer drywall, tile, cement board etc...

    • @ninjamaster3453
      @ninjamaster3453 4 роки тому +3

      Poorly. You'll need to do the drill bit trick or awl to find the first stud center then measure 16" over. That's hoping framing was consistent.
      Old parged wood lathe walls don't work with stud finders.
      The period where they put 1/4 to 3/8 drywall and parged with plaster and metal lathe to 1/2 to 3/4" dont work either.

    • @cj5939
      @cj5939 4 роки тому +5

      Likewise. I'd love to see a test on 1940's style plaster and lathe.

  • @mdjpurdon
    @mdjpurdon 4 роки тому +12

    I love the franklin, it's so fast to find a stud and makes it clear when you are seeing stacked studs. I've also used the franklin but I found that it used the batteries very quickly, not sure if there's a way to test that but I've had the franking for 3 years and changed batteries once and for whatever reason the Zircon always seems to be dead when I go to grab it.

  • @lahannid
    @lahannid Місяць тому

    I suddenly added the Franklin Sensors T6 to my Amazon cart. Thank you. This is a simple and easy stud finder I've been looking for.

  • @Damitsall
    @Damitsall 4 роки тому +26

    PROJECT FARM for Nobel Peace Prize and Congressional Medal of Honor, change my mind.

  • @ShadeMoonMC
    @ShadeMoonMC 4 роки тому +138

    It claims it can find live wire
    Me: let me hear it
    Project farm: we’re gonna test that
    Me: yes👏🏼

  • @wornoutwasd8567
    @wornoutwasd8567 4 роки тому +29

    A great public service. Thank you for your fast, to the point, high quality, and thorough reviews!

  • @HCG
    @HCG 2 роки тому +63

    Please test the Walabot 2 next round, it’s a bit expensive at $170, but it basically lets you see through walls. I’m really interested how it would do against some of the other more premium stud finders

    • @7628739
      @7628739 2 роки тому

      I bought my walabot 5 yrs ago, it has not let me down yet. like thebfinding pioe and wire feature

    • @dcgo44r
      @dcgo44r Рік тому +1

      I thought he would be reviewing it.. It's been out for a few years out now. I use to have the middle range ($) zircom and it's now on the trash! I do better with a small pilot hole!

    • @HCG
      @HCG Рік тому

      @@nextprojectawesome9673 Why a pain for pros?

    • @dennisfahey2379
      @dennisfahey2379 11 місяців тому +1

      I can attest to the Walabot being very good. Its not as fast as some of these but it does the job well. I've used it on both lathe and plaster and drywall. Note it operates differently for each. For drywall its as advertised with the cartoon of the stud, romex, etc. (It can detect a critter supposedly.) For lathe and plaster its not so pretty. It gives you a zone "blob" that is the shape of what is below. So a stud is narrow rectangular-ish blob and a pipe is narrower etc. Think thermal camera. That said - it was very accurate and for old lathe and plaster that is nice to have especially if your house was pre-code or had an improvisational handyman.

  • @ggj666
    @ggj666 4 роки тому +5

    I have to say the amount of detail and the setting up of these tests that you do are amazing. Thank you for the hard work you put in to these comparisons.

  • @RDelacroix
    @RDelacroix 4 роки тому +29

    Would love to see how the Walabot DIY Plus does. Only works with an android phone though.

    • @rdy4trvl
      @rdy4trvl 4 роки тому +2

      Yea, need to throw Walabot into the test pool. For a while, they were certainly the most prolific marketer. Otherwise, a great review as always!!

    • @Krautastic
      @Krautastic 4 роки тому +3

      walabot and FLIR ONE camera

    • @derekfarley5899
      @derekfarley5899 4 роки тому +2

      It was disappointing and I sent it back.

    • @uppercut70
      @uppercut70 4 роки тому +2

      I have the first generation Walabot, it also gives me false positives for stud location sometimes

    • @kylefowler5082
      @kylefowler5082 4 роки тому +2

      I also would love to see the Walabot tested along with another round of stud finders. I only trust you Todd, go Project Farm!

  • @TheDementation
    @TheDementation 3 роки тому +9

    I worked for Bosch and bought one of theirs cheap with employee discount, and it was crap. Im glad I didnt pay the insane prices they charged, and once again you proved what I had suspected. The top end Bosch found everything, but at an insane price.

  • @grakusgg6059
    @grakusgg6059 Рік тому +3

    I love how in depth you go with your tests.

  • @Cnightz
    @Cnightz 4 роки тому +377

    Bro, You have a shirt that says "Let's get this project underway. Now you need a shirt that says "We're gonna test that"

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +58

      Great suggestion.

    • @elreyyakko
      @elreyyakko 4 роки тому +11

      Id buy that shirt.

    • @Cnightz
      @Cnightz 4 роки тому +8

      He absolutely needs to have a shirt that says that. Project Farm... "We're gonna test that!
      I'll wear it while shopping at the big box stores when someone comes up to push a different sale.
      Bro, haven't seen the channel? Check it out.

    • @joelterrishafer6713
      @joelterrishafer6713 3 роки тому +2

      I’d buy one too!

    • @jpdominator
      @jpdominator 3 роки тому +2

      Me too!

  • @anthonytausig6820
    @anthonytausig6820 2 роки тому +3

    Zircon released a bunch of new stud finders. Could you do an updated video on the Zircons, Walabot DIY2 and and some other digital stud finders?

  • @4115steve
    @4115steve 2 місяці тому

    I feel like an old man watching a video about a stud finder so diligently. Great videos, thank you

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  2 місяці тому

      Thanks and you are welcome!

  • @avnut5517
    @avnut5517 4 роки тому +5

    Excellent review. Some of the most useful and entertaining content on UA-cam.
    I have had excellent results with Zircon.
    I can appreciate your unbiased and thorough reviews.
    Keep up the good work!

  • @emkkahn
    @emkkahn 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you for this video! I own the Zertex and was happy to find out how useful it is...
    But wow! It's hard to purchase a stud finder without any outside data to inform you as a consumer. YOU have really made it easier for people! Thanks!

  • @crmcbrideww
    @crmcbrideww 4 роки тому +23

    Hey can you do some lawn and garden stuff? I would love to know what the best weed killer and the best pest control for lawns.

  • @shane864
    @shane864 2 роки тому +2

    I am honor bound to comment every time I watch one of your videos that you have the most useful channel on UA-cam because you test simple tools that matter a lot and no one else does. Bless you fam. Bless u.

  • @xxxlonewolf49
    @xxxlonewolf49 4 роки тому +49

    for 262$ USD the botch better find fracking tumors on people too, sheesh.

    • @skuula
      @skuula 4 роки тому

      Seems to be worth it, if you use one a LOT.

    • @RTS_Games0110
      @RTS_Games0110 4 роки тому +1

      Brand new for $219 and free shipping on eBay.

    • @RTS_Games0110
      @RTS_Games0110 4 роки тому +1

      Bosch also has the D-tect 150 which retails for around $800 or more.

    • @peterszar
      @peterszar 4 роки тому +2

      Very funny, I like the way you misspelled Bosch, At least I think that was intentional. ha ha.

    • @InspiredCraftsman
      @InspiredCraftsman 4 роки тому

      Did I miss something with the dtect 120? It gives the same signal for copper pipe, metal pipe, pvc, and everything? If you need to know where a fire sprinkler or water line the scanner doesn't give you a different signal than a stud.

  • @davidcrandon2329
    @davidcrandon2329 2 роки тому +6

    You are awesome. Reminds me of Consumer Reports in the old days.Thanks!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  2 роки тому

      Thanks for supporting the channel! I really appreciate it!

  • @davidstepeck2644
    @davidstepeck2644 3 роки тому +8

    PF, I have a Zircon tester and built my two homes with it. It never let me down. And to me, being off on the edge of a stud by an eight of an inch isn’t a big deal. You usually just want to find center so you can hang a picture or install a shelf. Great video as always!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  3 роки тому +1

      Thanks! Thanks for sharing.

    • @davidstepeck2644
      @davidstepeck2644 Рік тому

      @@dcgo44r You need a stud finder to locate studs behind the Sheetrock to install shelves, hang pictures etc. I don’t understand your question; should I have memorized every stud location?

    • @dcgo44r
      @dcgo44r Рік тому +1

      @@davidstepeck2644 sorry it wasn't a question.. Me being me.. Builders usually leave the wall marked with white strokes where the studs are located! But you are ok.. Don't mind me! Lol!

    • @davidstepeck2644
      @davidstepeck2644 Рік тому

      @@dcgo44r The white marks you are speaking of is joint compound which covers the screw holes in the sheetrock. However, those “marks” get painted over etc. Haw a nice day!

    • @dcgo44r
      @dcgo44r Рік тому

      @@davidstepeck2644 I know.. That's the moment to hang whatever you need, while you see where the studs are! 😂

  • @mattb9664
    @mattb9664 2 роки тому +2

    Just picked up the Franklin Sensors pro model with the electrical detection. I was able to install some heavy duty metal shelving in my garage in just a few minutes. It's truly a joy being able to reliably see the studs in the wall and ceiling and know where the center is!

  • @x3roxide
    @x3roxide 4 роки тому +26

    I remember a few years ago, one stud finder came to market claiming to be much more (great marketing).
    was called the walabot I think. would be great to see it in this sort of comparison

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +7

      Thanks for the suggestion.

    • @waggy401
      @waggy401 4 роки тому +4

      Is that the one that connects to a cell phone? I'd like to see that.

    • @x3roxide
      @x3roxide 4 роки тому +3

      @@waggy401 that's the one. supposed to show you an image of what's behind the wall

    • @jeffbuck2624
      @jeffbuck2624 4 роки тому +1

      I have one of them, and its pretty reasonably priced, and so far, it has been fantastic. Admittedly, I've only used it a couple of times and I didn't know for sure what was really in there, so it may have been missing stuff, but it found my studs perfectly (I never missed with a screw at least) and it told me that one of the studs out of the 5 I located had an AC wire tacked to the left side of the stud. I traced the studs from the ceiling to the floor, and it was very consistent about the studs location. I've spent $30 on stud finders a bunch of times with mixed results. I'm glad I spent $70 this last time so I can quit buying the others. It's annoying there is no iPhone version though.

    • @johnsabato4745
      @johnsabato4745 4 роки тому +3

      I agree, the actual name is Walabot DIY. I own one and have been very impressed with performance, but I haven't needed or tested finding pipes or conduit. I bought mine on eBay for only $40 including shipping and connected it to an old Galaxy S7 phone. I have used it half a dozen time and it hasn't missed yet. I lend it to neighbors and they are also impressed. I would love to see it matched against the best devices of this test. Here is a demo video. It works just as shown in the video.

  • @pastork7797
    @pastork7797 4 роки тому +14

    I’ve got a 4 year old Zircon that’s almost identical to the one you tested. I agree, it’s a great product and an amazing value.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому

      Thanks for sharing.

    • @ducewags
      @ducewags 4 роки тому

      @Pastork How is it with old walls, plaster and lath?

  • @vpscorekeeper2008
    @vpscorekeeper2008 4 роки тому +7

    I would like to see how well these stud finders on a lath and plaster wall. I haven't found any that work yet!

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the suggestion.

    • @Dan-wt7jx
      @Dan-wt7jx 4 роки тому +1

      Best bet with plaster is a strong magnet, it will stick to the lath nails.

  • @geckogrant
    @geckogrant 2 місяці тому

    So I was thinking about buying a stud detector, although my past experiences with them have been hit and miss. But after watching your video explaining that the magnetic stud finders look for the screws not the stud it finally dawned on me to use some of the neodymium magnets I have on hand. Absolutely worked like a champ. For some reason, I always thought mag stud finders were just for finding metal studs. I feel like an idiot for not thinking of this. Anyway, strong neodymium magnets for the win. I wish I figured this out 20 years ago! You just saved me 50$. Thanks as always for the great vids!

  • @jazbuilding
    @jazbuilding 4 роки тому +5

    I love your videos and look forward to all of them. I appreciate the time, effort and resources you pour into them. They're very informative.
    I've had the displeasure of needing to use a stud finder and the bane is plaster and lath wall in a 100 year old colonial (with wallpaper).
    When using such a tool, one doesn't have the luxury of knowing what's behind the wall, and all detected junk causes confusing false positives. What I'd be interested in knowing is which stud finder can tell me where the studs are and differentiate them from wires, pipes, blocking, boxes, etc. Sorry if I missed it in your video, but if you have an unknown wall how reliably could you find the studs and not end up accidentally driving a screw into a water pipe? Do any of these clearly differentiate a wooden stud from all the other things? That's really what you need the stud finder for.
    I'm not sure super sensitivity is a good thing.

  • @6RAW6
    @6RAW6 4 роки тому +8

    Love all the test you do. I was curious if you would be interested in doing either a paint thickness gauge test or a gloss meter test. I detail cars on the weekends and always wondered how accurate those tools are, especially cheap vs high end. Thanks for all the videos you do, keep them coming.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +3

      Great suggestion! Thank you.

  • @mwniels
    @mwniels 4 роки тому +8

    I would love to see the walabot tested in a future round. It's quite different from a traditional scanner but makes some strong claims.

  • @king11824
    @king11824 2 роки тому

    With every passing year. Your passion for finding value in hard errand money is greatly appreciated!

  • @ronlovell5374
    @ronlovell5374 3 роки тому +24

    Great test video! I like Franklin Sensors for simplicity, and find it quicker for locating exact centers. They have a new Pro M50 model with changed design shape that looks closer to other brand stud finders. They added electrical sensing and additional depth and is about the same affordable price as the T6.

  • @joshua_J
    @joshua_J 4 роки тому +12

    I love Mondays because my boy project farm always makes my day with a great video. Let's gooooooo

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +4

      Awesome! Thank you very much! It means a lot to me!

    • @joshua_J
      @joshua_J 4 роки тому

      @@ProjectFarm keep up the great work. I don't know if you have ever tested ratchet straps but I would love to see a thorough test to see which one is the strongest, releases easiest, which one is most wear resistant. Things like that. Lol

  • @bernincoal1
    @bernincoal1 4 роки тому +10

    The work you do is a work of love. The time, prep and expense you put in. It's mind boggling. We don't deserve you. But you do it anyway...for US!
    Thank you!

  • @cb7pwn
    @cb7pwn 2 роки тому

    You have one of THE best channels on UA-cam for the helping pros choose the right tools for our trades, I've come here multiple times so as to not get screwed over whilst buying tools. Thanksa sincere thanks!

  • @jusb1066
    @jusb1066 4 роки тому +24

    Test engine flushes on some old engines, with lots of oil analysis to show what's actually being removed

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +6

      Great video idea! Thank you

    • @daftnord4957
      @daftnord4957 4 роки тому +2

      Perhaps also test oil from an old engine after switching to synthetic to see how much sludge was loosened

    • @sthenzel
      @sthenzel 4 роки тому +2

      That´ll be a pretty long test run!
      Which product family is better, the "add and use the car for a few days" or the "empty all out, fill with product and let idle for X minutes".
      And how does the latter compare to an 80/20 diesel/oil mix in the same setup (which worked well for me the three or four times I did it to some of my cars)?

    • @GamingAmbienceLive
      @GamingAmbienceLive 4 роки тому

      @@daftnord4957 scotty kilmer said that using synthetic oil on old engines is retarded and you shouldn't do it, they will run worse with worse gas mileage, synthetic oil was designed for new engines

    • @jusb1066
      @jusb1066 4 роки тому

      @@sthenzel oil Olympics videos were quite a long and important series, we certainly need to know if flush is important or a waste

  • @curtisweller4138
    @curtisweller4138 4 роки тому +9

    Costco sells a scanner, green in color, called Precision Sensors “ProFinder 550”. I’ve had good success with it locating studs and electrical wires. Once again, excellent video sir!

    • @shawnengstrom3906
      @shawnengstrom3906 4 роки тому

      Have the same one and it is the best I have used.

    • @narlycharley
      @narlycharley 4 роки тому

      I love mine. I think I got it on sale for really cheap.

    • @davidhsieh2761
      @davidhsieh2761 4 роки тому +1

      Just bought one today and this video came out lol

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +2

      Thanks for the feedback.

    • @jeffmill
      @jeffmill 4 роки тому

      Came here for this comment. That's a great sensor.

  • @wolfpack4128
    @wolfpack4128 4 роки тому +26

    Food for thought. One wall tear out and pipe replacement costs more than the Bosch Detect.

    • @ProjectFarm
      @ProjectFarm  4 роки тому +2

      Thanks for the feedback.

    • @mikeries8549
      @mikeries8549 4 роки тому +4

      Sounds like you've really screwed up and know what you're talking about. In over 40 years of construction I've never poked a hole in a pipe but I know I've nailed a wire or two.

    • @wolfpack4128
      @wolfpack4128 4 роки тому

      @@mikeries8549 not me but the contractor did. All seemed fine but a hidden pipe in the second story floor got cut. Luckily he didn't charge me for the hour and a half of work and the ceiling was already coming out in that area. Wires that are stapled behind the wall would be a nightmare to replace or else you would have to put a random box in the wall or do the crumby thing of leaving a splice behind a wall.

    • @LBCAndrew
      @LBCAndrew 4 роки тому

      @@mikeries8549 I put a screw through a water pipe in the wall in my garage once. Damn pipe wasn't straight vertical. Courtesy of decades of Southern California earthquakes. Thankfully the water shut-off was a few feet away at the water heater which would have made for very little water until someone opened a faucet upstairs.... draining the entire contents of that pipe into the garage.

  • @Bentleemedia
    @Bentleemedia 2 роки тому +1

    Love the walabot, shows you wires, pipes and studs all on your screen, I dedicated my old phone to it so it's always ready to go.