@@brick_patriot the 1x1 round stud and corner plate need to be placed a certain way on each side for each rear cannon, otherwise it will not function correctly after exceeding its rotation limit and may decouple causing a jam. Hopefully that resolves it!
I’d really like to get this kit, but the fact it’s flat really puts me off. It really wouldn’t have been hard to give it its proper shape instead of being flat on the bottom. Their Star Wars sets have been great at recreating the physical appearance of the ships and this is an odd departure from that ethos.
@@brick_patriot I agree, I think it might not sell as well as they hope. The new R2-D2 kit looks awesome though and I really want that Darth Malak mini fig!
@brick_patriot what do you mean displays terrible? It's not a ucs set, it's a play set. It still displays amazingly and doesn't need a bottom when it wouldnt be seen 90% of the time.
@@ChaoticMartian still bad to have a bottom that is 100% not accurate and only because there is a "useless" interior with so bad proportion that it will be used only if you are 5yo imagining a sw scene with the minifig
I just want Cal Kestis...
I couldn't agree more.... the build wasn't toooo bad!
Hey dude! I love your review style it’s super unique and informative. Keep at it!
Appreciate that! Much more to come..
Hey man! Love your reviews! I definitely am going to get this set. Look forward to more!
Awesome! Thank you!
Check the assembly of the rear cannon if its malfunctioning. Make sure the assembly and orientation is correct.
I just might have to try that! Thanks!
@@brick_patriot the 1x1 round stud and corner plate need to be placed a certain way on each side for each rear cannon, otherwise it will not function correctly after exceeding its rotation limit and may decouple causing a jam. Hopefully that resolves it!
It sadness me the scale has been shortening, compared to the 2006 and 2014
Yea true but going off the history..... This set will be made again 100%
I’d really like to get this kit, but the fact it’s flat really puts me off. It really wouldn’t have been hard to give it its proper shape instead of being flat on the bottom. Their Star Wars sets have been great at recreating the physical appearance of the ships and this is an odd departure from that ethos.
That seems to be everyone's same complaint. I had to display mine completely on its side! I can see this going on sale next year.
@@brick_patriot I agree, I think it might not sell as well as they hope. The new R2-D2 kit looks awesome though and I really want that Darth Malak mini fig!
hiiii
Hey hope you enjoyed the video!
imho the "interior" is a waste of brick that should have been used to make a proper bottom.... a flat imperial destroyer bottom is very meh
That’s such a good point. It displays terribly because there is no bottom. It should of had a stand 100%
@brick_patriot what do you mean displays terrible? It's not a ucs set, it's a play set. It still displays amazingly and doesn't need a bottom when it wouldnt be seen 90% of the time.
@@ChaoticMartian still bad to have a bottom that is 100% not accurate and only because there is a "useless" interior with so bad proportion that it will be used only if you are 5yo imagining a sw scene with the minifig
make a moc for display these are playsets
@@wootwoots what a tards take