Clicked on this without reading the full title, background noise, halfway through I thought 'that third voice sounds familiar... Roanoke?' It's the crossover I never knew I needed!
The ONLY thing to me that gives Bigfoot/Sasquatch any credibility is the fact that so many indigenous cultures around the world, that never had contact with one another, have such similar stories about Bigfoot like creatures. There are also a lot of stories about smaller hairy bipedal creatures that rarely gets as much attention. It's possible that these stories continue from tens of thousands of years ago when these cultures lived alongside other hominids and it's nothing more than that. I would love a deeper dive into why so many cultures around the world have a Sasquatch like creature in their folklore. It really isn't given enough attention just how many cultures have their own Bigfoot. Even only listing the main, well known ones from around the world there is a crazy amount. Nepal - Yeti America - Bigfoot Australia - Yowie China - Yeren Canada - Sasquatch Indonesia - Orang Pendek Russia / Asian mountains - Chuchunya - Almas Kenya - Chemosit Japan - Higbagon Brazil - Mapinguari Sri Lanka - Nittaewo Phillipines - Amomongo That's just the well known ones
every continent also has dragons. JBP has a theory that dragons are an amalgam of our racial genetic memory of being predated and natural disastered big cats/bears crocs raptor birds snakes forest fires all in one in a sort of genetic symbolism of our collective primal terror you might be able to explain the cultural ubiquity of samsquantch in a similar way...we may have an inborn cognitive toolkit for dealing with other hominids for 2 million years that left a dream creature behind in our psyches, also we carry their DNA, so we are them, we carry their shadows too. we bred with them, so it makes sense theres a dragon and a near-people imprint that are different imprints
For more dogman data, look into St. Christopher stories and depictions of him in the Catholic church. St. Christopher was a leader of an entire tribe that was extremely hostile to the other tribes of Europa and yet (by Grace) converted to Catholicism and was canonized. A few of the traditions indicate his dog features were healed at the baptism, which historically included a lesser or minor exercism as part of the sacrament. Many of the TLM parishes still incorporate that aspect.
I just came to a weird thought... What if Neanderthals are the reason for creation of dwarves as a mythos in Europe. Short, stocky, very hairy and stronger than humans of similar size. That would be cool if knowledge of those almost humans survived to these days as part of oral tradition.
I would just like to say that looking over grass is not the only reason that we evolved to stand upright. It could be covert evolution, the upright posture is very good for covering distances. Some of the earliest human hunting techniques and still practiced by some tribes is literally walking down your prey. It would make sense if they evolved to Walk down there prey and are migratory.
100% correct. I think that he is focusing too much on the "it has to be some kind of gorilla/ape" theory here. It makes an awful lot more sense that it's a hominid, and much closer to what we are than an ape or gorilla.
@@mattjack3983I think even the bigfoot depictions as more apelike are fairly modern. The native stories sounds like they are talking about hairy large wildmen more like usually. They can talk, have relations with humans even offspring, and all that. I dont know if they mention that here because i have not yet watched the stream fully. Also not only neanderthal mingled with modern humans, but also denisovan which we know fairly little about. Denisovan to my understanding seemed to give unique Gene to tibetans making surviving high altitudes in the mountains easier, but they also mixed with neanderthals
@@mattjack3983gorillas and apes are hominids hominid or hominidae covers all great apes extant or other wise including humans humans extant or otherwise are called hominins
Listening to the podcast sasquatch chronicals there are over 1000 episodes of eye witness accounts that usually cover a lot of the questions asked in this video
As an anthropologist, I feel called out about the Neanderthal thing :/. For humans 3-5% is most common for Neanderthal DNA present, but the highest recorded (I think) is 7% (in Europe)
Thank you. I have around 4% myself. I wonder that due to being pushed to harsher mountainous regions that hair growth and physical prowess became a more necessary evolution than tool craft and fire, which would create a yeti . There's stories of Gaulic tribes fighting them, so ya never know. Also, what is your view of the "Kurgan Theory" ?
Oh hell yeah!!! I love that most of my favorite content creators are almost all in eachothers circles; Roanoke, Wendigoon, Lorelodge, MoistCritical,, man, its awesome!
So glad you mentioned the rex audio! It is a sound you feel in your bones and has a primal fear to it. They also recreated a parasaurolophus sound and from the preserved laranx from a nodrasaur what they may have sounded like as well!
As someone who ate UK beef regularly throughout the 80s/90s Prions are 100% scaryaf! Can take up to 10-40 years to present so there could be a ticking timebomb waiting inthe population! I also wonder if the CWD got into the deer through deer feed using infected animal products. It was infecfted sheep/cow protein added to cow pellets that caused the BSE outbreak!
In my area cwd spread like wildfire in deer farms and "hunting" reserves. Basically any area they fenced in deer and raised them like cattle. Now it's out in the wild population and no signs of slowing down. I've had several friends harvest deer with the disease. Out of an abundance of caution they sent the deer heads off for testing, but the deer looked fine. It can be present with no visible signs. Basically deer farms have ruined hunting in my area, and may have signed the death warrant for wild deer population. Too bad they'll never be held legally liable, instead they all sold off their farms and probably live in luxury in other states.
Yes the rule of offspring is not very strict in a sense that barier for procreation can be just space. Ex: brown and white bears now were seen in the wild to make viable and fertile progeny. It happens because of warming which leads to their areal overlap much more than before. Also some scientists view H. Neanderthalensis as H. Sapiens neanderthalensis
Regarding the Prion transmission from deer to human, there were 2 hunters which hunted together who contracted the disease in the last few years. CBSnews just put out a story today.
On the matter of food, bears exist and Bigfoot likely have a similar diet to them. As far how they got to North America, the same land bridge that everything else that crossed over from Asia did.
Sasquatch are likely to be more carnivorous than bears(bears only have animal protein make up 15% if their diet), so that could explain how they survive winters without hibernation.
Yeah. I like Roanoke and all but I don’t see him as an open minded person like the Aiden’s. I used to watch his channel but got tired of the narrow minded conclusions.
OMG I am so tired of people who haven't studied the Patterson/Gimlin film trying to debunk it. Go to M K Davis and watch a good copy (most are poor copies from the thousands that were in theaters in the 60's. Davis is working from a first generation copy that he borrowed from Patterson's widow. It makes a difference. Another place to get a breakdown is Thinker Thunker. His channel is more fun and he gets the point across.
That is what makes me watch Roanoke that it’s more based in science. I like to be open minded but being to open minded is wishful thinking. Roanoke tries to explain what is biologically possible. I do think there is creatures we do not know about, but I feel we are at the point scientifically where we can say that a certain animal existing is biologically impossible on Earth.
@@dj63386MK Davis isn't the best either, drawing conclusions out of frames that weren't actually from the film, but just interpolation from when it was digatized.
Have to add my paleontologist's two cents to the ending bit about dinosaurs. (BTW my favorite dinosaur is Tarbosaurus Bataar because no one knows it and that makes me sad. My second favorite is Cryolophosaurus) 1. Most larger dinosaurs (Sauropods, large Theropods, Etc) were probably not feathered or if they were they were small feathers. If their hatchlings had any feathers remain to be seen but it was likely only the smaller dinosaurs that kept their feathers into adulthood. We have found skin impressions of many of these dinosaurs and there are scales without any evidence of feathers unlike the skin impressions we find of dinosaurs with feathers. I have in fact found skin impressions of a large Hadrosaur in Colorado from around the neck region and there are definitely no feathers on it. Side note to this, on some of the really well preserved feathered dinosaurs we have been able to get color compounds from the feather impressions and have a basic understanding of what colors they might have had. 2.Large dinosaurs probably didn't chirp, most large birds today don't chirp. There is strong evidence that Tyrannosaurs used ultra-low frequency vibrations to communicate like elephants do as they have large, thick pads on their feet that would absorb the soundwaves. Their vocalizations were probably much more similar to crocodiles with hisses; large birds often make similar sounds. The dinosaur that they made the cast of the nasal passage was a Parasaurolophus which was a Hadrosaur not a T-Rex. Very similar to the type of dinosaur that I found skin impressions of! They have however found a fossilized larynx of a Rex, which is where the confusion may have come from. 3. T-Rex arms could not physically bend backwards, they may have been tucked closer to the body than what is normally depicted (Mostly because a lot of depictions of T-rex makes them much skinnier then they would have been). Raptors and similarly bird-like dinosaurs likely had their arms "bent" like some flightless birds but they could not physically rotate their shoulders the same way birds could since that was something that came along with flight. Also fiction does not equal reality so what science learns doesn't mean that the old movies are wrong. Astronauts aren't going to go around and tell people the first Star Trek is terrible because that's not how space really works because it is fictional. Jurassic Park and similar movies are fictional and allowed to show dinosaurs however they want. Most of the other paleontologists I know either got into the field because of a dinosaur movie or have one they enjoy. It's really only those on the edge of science who like to stamp their feet and complain a fictional movie isn't scientifically accurate (Unfortunately they are also the loudest). However I cannot watch Prehistoric Planet because they are so lazy about their information while portraying it as fact. I'm not sure who was supposed to be fact checking it but they did a bad job.
Maybe you guys don't know, or maybe you're joking, and I'm just dense, but Colt .45 is a type of pistol cartridge, not a liquor. The liquor is named after the cartridge. .45 has been the go-to caliber for many firearms ever since Colt patented the Single Action Army revolver. Yes, the 1911 is a .45, made by Colt, but that's .45 ACP. When someone says Colt 45, they're more often talking about a SAA revolver chambered in .45 Long Colt (most people just say .45 Colt though it's specifically 45 Long Colt)
Regarding the "living on caves and mountains" thing and since Gigantopithecus was mentioned, it is believed they were cave dwellers as most of their fossils (Teeth and jaw bones) were found inside many caves in china, so It would be possible bigfoot also lives inside caves
I feel like Gigantopithecus isn't as great a Sasquatch parallel as many say. The only thing it has going for it is a comparable size, but everything else we think we know about Giganto doesn't line up with what witnesses cliam about bigfoot. I think either Australopithacines or Dryopithecus make for far better candidates for sasquatch ancestry.
I heard a dogman story where ex military guys went out to hunt some of these things down in Mississippi or somewhere in the south and the guy said he shot a dogman with a Lapua and it was hurt but didn't die. The rifle and ammo he shot it with (as far as I understand) is supposed to be able to pierce an engine block. Credibility was always low, but that detail sent it down to nothing for me. I am very religious, but I don't believe there are a bunch of supernatural wolf men running around. If it bleeds, it can be killed. If it can be killed, a Lapua should definitely do the job.
7:45 About the "Dogman" they are predominately female, cursed to be childless(among other things), and have a penchant for adopting lost children, human or animal. They are only aggressive if you pose a threat to the child they are taking care of, or any child and they happen to be nearby. They also prefer to move around in dense tree tops, or on the ground in even denser brush, so you are unlikely to spot one at all, let alone near a road. However, like with any most other creatures they will die if shot in the eye with anything capable of punching through the skull behind the eye. So the guy in that story was either drunk off his ass, the story he gave to the media was what the "suits" told him to say, he saw a Mimic(if they can mimic animals/people, surely they can mimic cryptids), or he missed.
Fun fact I am related to someone over 7 feet tall! His name is Brian. My genes are about 60% Dutch and 30% Belgian. My grandmother is full Dutch. But, Brian is a half nephew of my dad and my dad's father's known genes are Irish, English, and Dutch, and from what I heard he was average height. I don't know anything the maternal line there but I highly suspect Dutch. My dad is 6'6". My little sister is 6'2". We have a genetic disorder from my mom's side that probably affects height, but I was born premature and low weight and my sister was not, she is 2 years younger than me but she was always as tall as me or taller. I have pretty bad scoliosis and I was astonished to realize I have already shrunk to about 5'9.5". When I was a teenager I was nearly 5'11". However, because of my genetic disorder my wingspan is 6". Also, I consider myself to have a 'mild' case but I am less healthy than family members who suddenly died from this disorder. I have always had medical issues I have to manage.
On topic of the Dog Man, there is ine local to Bear Creek, Texas and Central Texas in general. It's called the Beast of Bear Creek or the Hill Country Monster.
What is interesting to me is that there are different variants/sub species of Sasquatch from sightings in the US. Here in the south, sasquatch is smaller and more aggressive. Some reports I’ve read show that they move more hunched and alternate between all fours and bipedal movement. Patty and more northern sasquatches seem to be overall larger and strictly bipedal. According to sightings from the North and the South, bigfoot could very easily supply themselves with food. Supposedly they can drag off cows with ease. To me there seems to be many similarities between sightings and the Patterson film to write it off as a hoax. As for lack of bodies, if they do have some sort of higher intellect, they might practice some sort of burial practice or cannibalism. I tend to disagree with Mattis’s theory about the Saskets so I doubt they’d have a higher intellect. I think they are definitely more animalistic and ape like according to accounts. They normally act very solitary in nature so an individual may have a large territory covering tens of miles. We’ll never now if they exist or not, logically I think not. If they do though, I believe they have to be in incredibly small numbers across the US and total population would have to be in the low thousands. Thanks for reading my unhinged rant
Regarding interspecies reproduction, it depends on how close the species are. In the case of Ligers and Tigon, the males are always sterile but the females can sometimes be fertile. Servals and Asian Leopard Cats, however, can be crossbred with domestic house cats and produce fertile offspring.
1:05:55 regarding the Superstition Mountains and the "mysterious deaths", one of the theories is that there was a serial killer straight up just sniping hikers in the hills and the coroner may or may not have been in on it because he ruled some obvious gunshot wounds as "natural causes".
As for the cwd , I've had friends who sent out their deer for testing and came back positive. The deer looked and behaved normal. No signs of the illness. That's the scary part. The deer can carry it with no outwardly visible symptoms for some time apparently. Unless the testing is being bungled by the pa game commission cross contaminating samples, and their deer were fine.
At 1:23:15 - I can see it. The wendigo is a winter monster, which would be when the deer are starving and unhealthy as it is. Assume a tribe faces a hard winter with suboptimal hunting. In the face of starvation, they’ll eat any meat, no matter how manky. If the meat is infected, then it’s possible you might get transmission, and then over time the story gets expanded on into the myth we know now Edit to add: as a Canadian, f the whole idea of a house sized one. But in all seriousness, birds are deeply unwholesome intelligences and I do not care for the idea of some vicious, gore-covered cassowary
So, real talk, wouldn’t cutting out the 4 minutes of “stream starting soon” screen for the VOD be one of the simplest edits to make on these things? No one’s clicking on a video to listen to extended silence or getting engaged enough to stick around for two hours by having to skip through it.
Plus, folks looking at the Patterson footage(and many other less famous alledged Sasquatch photos) have pointed out that limb proportions aren't exactly a normal human either. Plus we have all the stuff Dr. Jeff Meldrum has written about the footprints and how they seem to indicate radically different foot morphology with a midtarsel brake(the flexibility of which can bee seen in the PGF, look closely at her foot as she steps forward, the front half of her foot bends upwards)
I imagine Big foot would eat identical to a Brown Bear. By eye witness accounts the mass would be the similar. It would also explain why their are more sighting in locations where brown bears exist Either it exists by the sheer amount of sighting or the controllers of the matrix have a sense of humor or it’s not a natural animal but something more mystical like a interdemensional creature
I think it's a hominid of some kind, and closer to people than anything else. I would agree 100% that it's diet being identical to a brown bear. It's an omnivore; an opportunistic predator that consumes both plant and animal matter. And that is exactly what humans are as well, the only difference being that humans have harnessed control over agriculture. I don't know why or how they exist, and while I believe that they are hominids of some kind, cannot be certain of what they are. All i know for a fact that they ARE absolutely real and DO exist, living here in our forests in North America. I never used to believe it, and spent most of my life not giving it much thought, except but to think that the notion that a bigfoot creature could exist was just ridiculously silly. But that changed the day I saw them, here in the Missouri Ozarks. And it's completely turned my whole world upside down.
The question around 33:00 about interspecies breeding. It depends on the number of chromosomes, like the horse and donkey are 2 off so a mule has 1 more than I think a donkey but one less than a horse or vise versa.
2 additional possibilities. *bigfoot is much like a galapagos tortoise. Solitary, intelligent, and long lived. Perhaps living 1, 2 or even 300 years. Existing near eachother, typically gravitating to within a few miles of one another and really only coming together to mate. Composed of small famiky units with established territories. Maybe a mating couple holds a 50 to 100 square mile tract and only births 1 or 2 offspring in their whole life. *big foot is an alien avatar. A meat suit controlled by an intwlligent species.
Apologies if anyone already mentioned it, but I believe that a family of wolfman existed where all males had the trait as it was attached to the y chromosome. As such the mothers genes couldn't correct it. As most Bigfoot sightings are males could the wolfman theory be possible if you consider this. And this family existed in the 90's to the 2000's in Mexico, I cannot remember what the family was named but one was very famous in his area.
You mentioning the wolf man syndrome in a small population creating a subspecies? It reminds me of the Blue Fugates of Troublesome Creek. A man with a genetic blood disorder that made him appear blue married a carrier of the same gene. This was in the early days of Europeans in KY. They had a lot of blue children. Every generation had blue people until the mid 1900s.
It goes, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo ergaster, Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, which then evolved into Homo neanderthalensis, Homo sapiens, and Denisovans.
Hello, I really enjoy your videos and podcasts. I learn so much through them. I am really interested in your coffee as well and need some guidance on what I need to do to order some. I'm interested in the Forrest Green Blend. Because of your description on how you blended it, it sounds delicious
Neandhertals might be distinct species OR simply subspecies o Homo sapies. Subspecies can interbreed with fertile offspring as result. As for ligers, females can have youngs, males cannot.
If multi-hundred pound bears can survive in the woods, then why the confusion on how a multi-hundred pound ape could live in the forest. It's really a silly thing to head scratch about.
We humans are at the peak of our evolution. When you think about it, it makes sense. We care for and nurture those that throughout time would have died off or been left to die off. Our modern law and order is designed to protect the weak and non aggressive from the large and aggressive. We have weeded out and continue to weed out primitive behavior. The most successful men on earth is measured by education and monetary wealth rather than large and strong that can take what they want when they want to or need it. Civilization has slowed evolution to a stand still, if you believe in human evolution. Just an interesting theory I heard years ago.
Not debunked, but it is more complicated. That's only in regard to human migration however, the larger interchange between Asian and American species seen to have occurred from the formation of a land bridge, seeing as humans are the only animals to build boats.
@@butter7734 your compelling argument has swayed me, and I will henceforth disregard all other opinions on the matter. Seriously, put a bit of effort into it. Do any credible academics believe that there was one singular crossing over the Bering land bridge anymore? No, but simultaneously they all believe based on the available evidence that people did, indeed, cross the Bering land bridge. As I said before, the land bridge crossing hasn't been "debunked", it has been made more complicated, and all of this only applies to humans. Now you can either continue to pull the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears, choosing your eyes, and saying "nuh uh" as loud as possible, or provide something more than assertions backed up by your totally credible say so. Your choice, but if you're looking for advice on convincing others instead of wondering why no one takes you seriously while you make your proclamations, I'd suggest the latter; but for my own amusement I'd prefer you take the format tact.
@@butter7734 you never started arguing, so it's as good a time to stop as any I suppose. Baseless assertions aren't an argument. As for your command to "educate myself", I believe that's the root of our, well it isn't really a disagreement since only one of us is putting forth effort, but we can call it that regardless. Outside of native people condemning the Bering crossing based on the fact that they don't like it and it conflicts with their oral histories and religious beliefs, everyone is in agreement that yes, humans crossed into the Americas over the Bering land bridge. They also took a few other routes to get here, but the Bering land bridge was definitely involved based on the best available archeological and genetic evidence. You would know that if you bothered to read more than the handful of pieces that confirm your existing viewpoint and instead took the time to sample evidence from multiple sources, you know, have yourself a proper education on the matter, but that level of irony might be dangerous for someone so angrily close minded, so be careful.
Once upon a Time many many years ago my mother's barrel racing mare stole a bag of cooked pork chops that I was going to take camping and ate them after tearing the plastic bag open.
Sheep and goats can produce fertile offspring, but sheep and goats have the same number of chromosomes where horses and donkeys have a different number. Geeps (goat sheeps) have an even chromosome number, and mules have an odd chromosomes number
I thought that once you lost a trait you could not get it back, like that cat species that became vegetarian for a while (lost its canine teeth) & then it went back to eating meat, but it couldn't redevelop canine teeth so it made huge foreteeth like cartoon rabbits.
It will really help if you put links to guest youtube channel in description, For me as non-native eanglish speaker it is hard to know how to write from hearing.
I’m super late to this and the genetic topic got me back in something that’s always confused me. Genetics is one of those things where we may never fully understand it. By all things we know, if something like a Jack Russell or a Great Dane evolved in the wild naturally it’d be considered a species, yet we’ve done it in captivity and they’re not even considered a subspecies. And if we were to cross a JRT and a GD there’s a high chance of not only viable offspring, but offspring that can reproduce. To bounce off that. Foxes and dogs aren’t able to reproduce and have viable offspring, yet there’s a living example of a Culepo, a South American Fox Species, and a domestic dog hybrid.
look up "feathered dinosaurs aren't scary paleoart" and you'll change your mind quickly 😂 it's also theorized that the bigger dinosaurs by majority still did not have feathers, as at their size it would make them over heat in most climates of the day, trex being among them, and that trex was an ambush predator, so it probably wouldn't make any sound if it was hunting you. Also don't know what you mean about geese not being scary, you ever met a goose?
I was a dinosaur kid but it was velociraptors! Gonna make me sad, saying I'm not a real dino kid lol. Okay, okay, my biggest favourites were pleisiosaur and elasmasaurus, I just have some thalassaphobia and don't like thinking about the big sea lizards, all the time. XD Current favourite is compsognathus, if I'm spelling that right. I just like dinosaurs my height or smaller, at this point, lol. Now I'm thinking about dinosaurs and keep thinking of more I adore.
Beavers actually really dont eat wood. They eat the bark, and the nutritional layer right under the bark. They just chew wood to use them for the dam building material
@lalli8152 of course they don't eat the actual wood pulp but they have a specialized digestive system..maybe Bigfoot has a digestive system like a goat and can eat any and everything around them .
3:47 start
thank you
Legend
Nicely done
Thank you!
Goat 🐐
Clicked on this without reading the full title, background noise, halfway through I thought 'that third voice sounds familiar... Roanoke?' It's the crossover I never knew I needed!
Prairie grass grew 8-10 ft high. Cattle and people could actually go missing in the 1800s
Grew? It still does in places. Come to SD peak summer in the countryside you'll get some tallllll grass.
Having watched both of these channels for a long time, this collaboration is just *chef's kiss*
Roanoke "short kings rise up"
Me. "Well they have to to get stuff off the shelf."
This is a collab I didn’t know u needed I love Roanokes stuff
The ONLY thing to me that gives Bigfoot/Sasquatch any credibility is the fact that so many indigenous cultures around the world, that never had contact with one another, have such similar stories about Bigfoot like creatures. There are also a lot of stories about smaller hairy bipedal creatures that rarely gets as much attention.
It's possible that these stories continue from tens of thousands of years ago when these cultures lived alongside other hominids and it's nothing more than that.
I would love a deeper dive into why so many cultures around the world have a Sasquatch like creature in their folklore. It really isn't given enough attention just how many cultures have their own Bigfoot. Even only listing the main, well known ones from around the world there is a crazy amount.
Nepal - Yeti
America - Bigfoot
Australia - Yowie
China - Yeren
Canada - Sasquatch
Indonesia - Orang Pendek
Russia / Asian mountains - Chuchunya - Almas
Kenya - Chemosit
Japan - Higbagon
Brazil - Mapinguari
Sri Lanka - Nittaewo
Phillipines - Amomongo
That's just the well known ones
There were small skeletons found on the island of Flores so realistically they could have left there instead of died out
every continent also has dragons.
JBP has a theory that dragons are an amalgam of our racial genetic memory of being predated and natural disastered
big cats/bears
crocs
raptor birds
snakes
forest fires
all in one in a sort of genetic symbolism of our collective primal terror
you might be able to explain the cultural ubiquity of samsquantch in a similar way...we may have an inborn cognitive toolkit for dealing with other hominids for 2 million years that left a dream creature behind in our psyches, also we carry their DNA, so we are them, we carry their shadows too. we bred with them, so it makes sense theres a dragon and a near-people imprint that are different imprints
I am so excited that you teamed up with Roanoke! He’s one of my top 5 UA-camrs. I hope you’ll have him on again!
For more dogman data, look into St. Christopher stories and depictions of him in the Catholic church. St. Christopher was a leader of an entire tribe that was extremely hostile to the other tribes of Europa and yet (by Grace) converted to Catholicism and was canonized. A few of the traditions indicate his dog features were healed at the baptism, which historically included a lesser or minor exercism as part of the sacrament. Many of the TLM parishes still incorporate that aspect.
I’ve heard historians say they believe it was a mistranslation. “Christopher the Canaanite” because “Christopher the Canine-ite,” hence the depictions
@@reynardwaltz9815
Aparently, there are two main understandings of him that divide along Eastern and Western traditions.
I just came to a weird thought... What if Neanderthals are the reason for creation of dwarves as a mythos in Europe. Short, stocky, very hairy and stronger than humans of similar size. That would be cool if knowledge of those almost humans survived to these days as part of oral tradition.
Dwarves are real.
I would just like to say that looking over grass is not the only reason that we evolved to stand upright. It could be covert evolution, the upright posture is very good for covering distances. Some of the earliest human hunting techniques and still practiced by some tribes is literally walking down your prey. It would make sense if they evolved to Walk down there prey and are migratory.
100% correct. I think that he is focusing too much on the "it has to be some kind of gorilla/ape" theory here. It makes an awful lot more sense that it's a hominid, and much closer to what we are than an ape or gorilla.
@@mattjack3983I think even the bigfoot depictions as more apelike are fairly modern. The native stories sounds like they are talking about hairy large wildmen more like usually. They can talk, have relations with humans even offspring, and all that. I dont know if they mention that here because i have not yet watched the stream fully. Also not only neanderthal mingled with modern humans, but also denisovan which we know fairly little about. Denisovan to my understanding seemed to give unique Gene to tibetans making surviving high altitudes in the mountains easier, but they also mixed with neanderthals
@@mattjack3983gorillas and apes are hominids hominid or hominidae covers all great apes extant or other wise including humans humans extant or otherwise are called hominins
Listening to the podcast sasquatch chronicals there are over 1000 episodes of eye witness accounts that usually cover a lot of the questions asked in this video
As an anthropologist, I feel called out about the Neanderthal thing :/. For humans 3-5% is most common for Neanderthal DNA present, but the highest recorded (I think) is 7% (in Europe)
Thank you. I have around 4% myself. I wonder that due to being pushed to harsher mountainous regions that hair growth and physical prowess became a more necessary evolution than tool craft and fire, which would create a yeti . There's stories of Gaulic tribes fighting them, so ya never know. Also, what is your view of the "Kurgan Theory" ?
Oh hell yeah!!! I love that most of my favorite content creators are almost all in eachothers circles; Roanoke, Wendigoon, Lorelodge, MoistCritical,, man, its awesome!
too bad they're all ignorant.
@@mmrroo-n7gwdym
"Like a cat with a primordial stomach...blah blah blah" *Aiden's brain melting in real time*
Naw bro. It's a cat with a Lazer. So intrigued in an allusion.
I am so happy to see that they are doing a collab with Roanoke up and watching that man for years
Everyone go check out Stefan Milo for really excellent videos on prehistoric humans, hominids, etc. He's top shelf for that content
Gutsick gibbon is another
100%. It's insane how precarious the situation was for these other humans and us long ago, especially when they encountered each other.
So glad you mentioned the rex audio! It is a sound you feel in your bones and has a primal fear to it. They also recreated a parasaurolophus sound and from the preserved laranx from a nodrasaur what they may have sounded like as well!
As someone who ate UK beef regularly throughout the 80s/90s Prions are 100% scaryaf! Can take up to 10-40 years to present so there could be a ticking timebomb waiting inthe population!
I also wonder if the CWD got into the deer through deer feed using infected animal products. It was infecfted sheep/cow protein added to cow pellets that caused the BSE outbreak!
In my area cwd spread like wildfire in deer farms and "hunting" reserves. Basically any area they fenced in deer and raised them like cattle. Now it's out in the wild population and no signs of slowing down. I've had several friends harvest deer with the disease. Out of an abundance of caution they sent the deer heads off for testing, but the deer looked fine. It can be present with no visible signs. Basically deer farms have ruined hunting in my area, and may have signed the death warrant for wild deer population. Too bad they'll never be held legally liable, instead they all sold off their farms and probably live in luxury in other states.
Yes the rule of offspring is not very strict in a sense that barier for procreation can be just space. Ex: brown and white bears now were seen in the wild to make viable and fertile progeny. It happens because of warming which leads to their areal overlap much more than before.
Also some scientists view H. Neanderthalensis as H. Sapiens neanderthalensis
Regarding the Prion transmission from deer to human, there were 2 hunters which hunted together who contracted the disease in the last few years. CBSnews just put out a story today.
The colt 45 refers to a revolver.
On the matter of food, bears exist and Bigfoot likely have a similar diet to them. As far how they got to North America, the same land bridge that everything else that crossed over from Asia did.
Sasquatch are likely to be more carnivorous than bears(bears only have animal protein make up 15% if their diet), so that could explain how they survive winters without hibernation.
Impressive that he managed to debunk the Paterson Gimlin footage without watching it???????????????
Yeah. I like Roanoke and all but I don’t see him as an open minded person like the Aiden’s.
I used to watch his channel but got tired of the narrow minded conclusions.
OMG I am so tired of people who haven't studied the Patterson/Gimlin film trying to debunk it. Go to M K Davis and watch a good copy (most are poor copies from the thousands that were in theaters in the 60's. Davis is working from a first generation copy that he borrowed from Patterson's widow. It makes a difference. Another place to get a breakdown is Thinker Thunker. His channel is more fun and he gets the point across.
That is what makes me watch Roanoke that it’s more based in science. I like to be open minded but being to open minded is wishful thinking. Roanoke tries to explain what is biologically possible. I do think there is creatures we do not know about, but I feel we are at the point scientifically where we can say that a certain animal existing is biologically impossible on Earth.
@@dj63386MK Davis isn't the best either, drawing conclusions out of frames that weren't actually from the film, but just interpolation from when it was digatized.
Have to add my paleontologist's two cents to the ending bit about dinosaurs. (BTW my favorite dinosaur is Tarbosaurus Bataar because no one knows it and that makes me sad. My second favorite is Cryolophosaurus)
1. Most larger dinosaurs (Sauropods, large Theropods, Etc) were probably not feathered or if they were they were small feathers. If their hatchlings had any feathers remain to be seen but it was likely only the smaller dinosaurs that kept their feathers into adulthood. We have found skin impressions of many of these dinosaurs and there are scales without any evidence of feathers unlike the skin impressions we find of dinosaurs with feathers. I have in fact found skin impressions of a large Hadrosaur in Colorado from around the neck region and there are definitely no feathers on it.
Side note to this, on some of the really well preserved feathered dinosaurs we have been able to get color compounds from the feather impressions and have a basic understanding of what colors they might have had.
2.Large dinosaurs probably didn't chirp, most large birds today don't chirp. There is strong evidence that Tyrannosaurs used ultra-low frequency vibrations to communicate like elephants do as they have large, thick pads on their feet that would absorb the soundwaves. Their vocalizations were probably much more similar to crocodiles with hisses; large birds often make similar sounds.
The dinosaur that they made the cast of the nasal passage was a Parasaurolophus which was a Hadrosaur not a T-Rex. Very similar to the type of dinosaur that I found skin impressions of! They have however found a fossilized larynx of a Rex, which is where the confusion may have come from.
3. T-Rex arms could not physically bend backwards, they may have been tucked closer to the body than what is normally depicted (Mostly because a lot of depictions of T-rex makes them much skinnier then they would have been). Raptors and similarly bird-like dinosaurs likely had their arms "bent" like some flightless birds but they could not physically rotate their shoulders the same way birds could since that was something that came along with flight.
Also fiction does not equal reality so what science learns doesn't mean that the old movies are wrong. Astronauts aren't going to go around and tell people the first Star Trek is terrible because that's not how space really works because it is fictional. Jurassic Park and similar movies are fictional and allowed to show dinosaurs however they want. Most of the other paleontologists I know either got into the field because of a dinosaur movie or have one they enjoy. It's really only those on the edge of science who like to stamp their feet and complain a fictional movie isn't scientifically accurate (Unfortunately they are also the loudest). However I cannot watch Prehistoric Planet because they are so lazy about their information while portraying it as fact. I'm not sure who was supposed to be fact checking it but they did a bad job.
Maybe you guys don't know, or maybe you're joking, and I'm just dense, but Colt .45 is a type of pistol cartridge, not a liquor. The liquor is named after the cartridge. .45 has been the go-to caliber for many firearms ever since Colt patented the Single Action Army revolver. Yes, the 1911 is a .45, made by Colt, but that's .45 ACP. When someone says Colt 45, they're more often talking about a SAA revolver chambered in .45 Long Colt (most people just say .45 Colt though it's specifically 45 Long Colt)
There is also a Colt 45 brand malt liquor haha
Regarding the "living on caves and mountains" thing and since Gigantopithecus was mentioned, it is believed they were cave dwellers as most of their fossils (Teeth and jaw bones) were found inside many caves in china, so It would be possible bigfoot also lives inside caves
I feel like Gigantopithecus isn't as great a Sasquatch parallel as many say. The only thing it has going for it is a comparable size, but everything else we think we know about Giganto doesn't line up with what witnesses cliam about bigfoot.
I think either Australopithacines or Dryopithecus make for far better candidates for sasquatch ancestry.
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you. Two of my favorite tubers working together. Both Aidan’s.
As somebody who works in data analytics, the "SWAG analysis" is a long-respected methodology. 😆
“Dogman” is also reported a lot in Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Kentucky, particularly the Land Between The Lakes ares.
I heard a dogman story where ex military guys went out to hunt some of these things down in Mississippi or somewhere in the south and the guy said he shot a dogman with a Lapua and it was hurt but didn't die. The rifle and ammo he shot it with (as far as I understand) is supposed to be able to pierce an engine block. Credibility was always low, but that detail sent it down to nothing for me. I am very religious, but I don't believe there are a bunch of supernatural wolf men running around. If it bleeds, it can be killed. If it can be killed, a Lapua should definitely do the job.
7:45 About the "Dogman" they are predominately female, cursed to be childless(among other things), and have a penchant for adopting lost children, human or animal. They are only aggressive if you pose a threat to the child they are taking care of, or any child and they happen to be nearby. They also prefer to move around in dense tree tops, or on the ground in even denser brush, so you are unlikely to spot one at all, let alone near a road.
However, like with any most other creatures they will die if shot in the eye with anything capable of punching through the skull behind the eye. So the guy in that story was either drunk off his ass, the story he gave to the media was what the "suits" told him to say, he saw a Mimic(if they can mimic animals/people, surely they can mimic cryptids), or he missed.
Gigantopithecus subsisted of bamboo just like great pandas - and bamboo might be the least nutritious thing you could eat.
This is the best collab I never expected to happen!! My boy broanoke!
Wow really upgrading the streams guys, great topics and great guest . Possibly best episode yet!
Fun fact I am related to someone over 7 feet tall! His name is Brian. My genes are about 60% Dutch and 30% Belgian. My grandmother is full Dutch. But, Brian is a half nephew of my dad and my dad's father's known genes are Irish, English, and Dutch, and from what I heard he was average height. I don't know anything the maternal line there but I highly suspect Dutch.
My dad is 6'6". My little sister is 6'2". We have a genetic disorder from my mom's side that probably affects height, but I was born premature and low weight and my sister was not, she is 2 years younger than me but she was always as tall as me or taller.
I have pretty bad scoliosis and I was astonished to realize I have already shrunk to about 5'9.5". When I was a teenager I was nearly 5'11". However, because of my genetic disorder my wingspan is 6". Also, I consider myself to have a 'mild' case but I am less healthy than family members who suddenly died from this disorder. I have always had medical issues I have to manage.
On topic of the Dog Man, there is ine local to Bear Creek, Texas and Central Texas in general. It's called the Beast of Bear Creek or the Hill Country Monster.
I was into dinosaurs, too. Triceratops, and Stegasaurus were super cool to me
What is interesting to me is that there are different variants/sub species of Sasquatch from sightings in the US. Here in the south, sasquatch is smaller and more aggressive. Some reports I’ve read show that they move more hunched and alternate between all fours and bipedal movement. Patty and more northern sasquatches seem to be overall larger and strictly bipedal.
According to sightings from the North and the South, bigfoot could very easily supply themselves with food. Supposedly they can drag off cows with ease. To me there seems to be many similarities between sightings and the Patterson film to write it off as a hoax.
As for lack of bodies, if they do have some sort of higher intellect, they might practice some sort of burial practice or cannibalism. I tend to disagree with Mattis’s theory about the Saskets so I doubt they’d have a higher intellect. I think they are definitely more animalistic and ape like according to accounts. They normally act very solitary in nature so an individual may have a large territory covering tens of miles.
We’ll never now if they exist or not, logically I think not. If they do though, I believe they have to be in incredibly small numbers across the US and total population would have to be in the low thousands. Thanks for reading my unhinged rant
Regarding interspecies reproduction, it depends on how close the species are. In the case of Ligers and Tigon, the males are always sterile but the females can sometimes be fertile. Servals and Asian Leopard Cats, however, can be crossbred with domestic house cats and produce fertile offspring.
I loved trolling professors in college. Pronouncing stuff wrong multiple times. Then i would call them out for messing up Native words as in towns.
1:05:55 regarding the Superstition Mountains and the "mysterious deaths", one of the theories is that there was a serial killer straight up just sniping hikers in the hills and the coroner may or may not have been in on it because he ruled some obvious gunshot wounds as "natural causes".
As for the cwd , I've had friends who sent out their deer for testing and came back positive. The deer looked and behaved normal. No signs of the illness. That's the scary part. The deer can carry it with no outwardly visible symptoms for some time apparently. Unless the testing is being bungled by the pa game commission cross contaminating samples, and their deer were fine.
The bit talking about primatology makes me think that Erika from Gutsick Gibbon would be an excellent guest to have on the show
Definitely
Or bigfoot isn't an ape? Very archaic human/something cross with a parallel evolution? I dunno, spitballing here :)
Archaic humans would still be apes.
At 1:23:15 - I can see it. The wendigo is a winter monster, which would be when the deer are starving and unhealthy as it is. Assume a tribe faces a hard winter with suboptimal hunting. In the face of starvation, they’ll eat any meat, no matter how manky.
If the meat is infected, then it’s possible you might get transmission, and then over time the story gets expanded on into the myth we know now
Edit to add: as a Canadian, f the whole idea of a house sized one. But in all seriousness, birds are deeply unwholesome intelligences and I do not care for the idea of some vicious, gore-covered cassowary
So, real talk, wouldn’t cutting out the 4 minutes of “stream starting soon” screen for the VOD be one of the simplest edits to make on these things? No one’s clicking on a video to listen to extended silence or getting engaged enough to stick around for two hours by having to skip through it.
My grandpa did one of those dna tests and he was credited with haveing the most neandethal dna they have recorded
It's weird seeing Roanoke on here watched his videos many times and am just now seeing his face
It's hypothesized that the height of the dutch comes from their large intake of dairy over generations.
If Bigfoot is a hominid rather than an ape, the whole “it’s not built like an ape” argument goes out the window.
Plus, folks looking at the Patterson footage(and many other less famous alledged Sasquatch photos) have pointed out that limb proportions aren't exactly a normal human either.
Plus we have all the stuff Dr. Jeff Meldrum has written about the footprints and how they seem to indicate radically different foot morphology with a midtarsel brake(the flexibility of which can bee seen in the PGF, look closely at her foot as she steps forward, the front half of her foot bends upwards)
The bigger you get the less calories you need per lb, that differs per animal
I imagine Big foot would eat identical to a Brown Bear. By eye witness accounts the mass would be the similar. It would also explain why their are more sighting in locations where brown bears exist
Either it exists by the sheer amount of sighting or the controllers of the matrix have a sense of humor or it’s not a natural animal but something more mystical like a interdemensional creature
I think it's a hominid of some kind, and closer to people than anything else. I would agree 100% that it's diet being identical to a brown bear. It's an omnivore; an opportunistic predator that consumes both plant and animal matter. And that is exactly what humans are as well, the only difference being that humans have harnessed control over agriculture. I don't know why or how they exist, and while I believe that they are hominids of some kind, cannot be certain of what they are. All i know for a fact that they ARE absolutely real and DO exist, living here in our forests in North America. I never used to believe it, and spent most of my life not giving it much thought, except but to think that the notion that a bigfoot creature could exist was just ridiculously silly. But that changed the day I saw them, here in the Missouri Ozarks. And it's completely turned my whole world upside down.
The question around 33:00 about interspecies breeding. It depends on the number of chromosomes, like the horse and donkey are 2 off so a mule has 1 more than I think a donkey but one less than a horse or vise versa.
The big reason to be in the mountains is security
2 additional possibilities.
*bigfoot is much like a galapagos tortoise. Solitary, intelligent, and long lived. Perhaps living 1, 2 or even 300 years. Existing near eachother, typically gravitating to within a few miles of one another and really only coming together to mate. Composed of small famiky units with established territories. Maybe a mating couple holds a 50 to 100 square mile tract and only births 1 or 2 offspring in their whole life.
*big foot is an alien avatar. A meat suit controlled by an intwlligent species.
Apologies if anyone already mentioned it, but I believe that a family of wolfman existed where all males had the trait as it was attached to the y chromosome. As such the mothers genes couldn't correct it. As most Bigfoot sightings are males could the wolfman theory be possible if you consider this. And this family existed in the 90's to the 2000's in Mexico, I cannot remember what the family was named but one was very famous in his area.
You mentioning the wolf man syndrome in a small population creating a subspecies? It reminds me of the Blue Fugates of Troublesome Creek. A man with a genetic blood disorder that made him appear blue married a carrier of the same gene. This was in the early days of Europeans in KY. They had a lot of blue children. Every generation had blue people until the mid 1900s.
It goes, Australopithecus, Homo habilis, Homo ergaster, Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, which then evolved into Homo neanderthalensis, Homo sapiens, and Denisovans.
I always considered the interspecies breeding of humans and neanderthal similar to how different species of dogs can breed
Neanderthal are way to close to modern humans to have anything to do with sasquatch.
Hello, I really enjoy your videos and podcasts. I learn so much through them.
I am really interested in your coffee as well and need some guidance on what I need to do to order some.
I'm interested in the Forrest Green Blend. Because of your description on how you blended it, it sounds delicious
Neandhertals might be distinct species OR simply subspecies o Homo sapies. Subspecies can interbreed with fertile offspring as result. As for ligers, females can have youngs, males cannot.
If multi-hundred pound bears can survive in the woods, then why the confusion on how a multi-hundred pound ape could live in the forest. It's really a silly thing to head scratch about.
We humans are at the peak of our evolution. When you think about it, it makes sense. We care for and nurture those that throughout time would have died off or been left to die off. Our modern law and order is designed to protect the weak and non aggressive from the large and aggressive. We have weeded out and continue to weed out primitive behavior. The most successful men on earth is measured by education and monetary wealth rather than large and strong that can take what they want when they want to or need it. Civilization has slowed evolution to a stand still, if you believe in human evolution. Just an interesting theory I heard years ago.
Two of my favorite creators! Woot!!
Yes Europe has bears.
The land bridge hypothesis has been debunked by genealogists.
Not debunked, but it is more complicated. That's only in regard to human migration however, the larger interchange between Asian and American species seen to have occurred from the formation of a land bridge, seeing as humans are the only animals to build boats.
@@benjaminsmith3843 wrong.
@@butter7734 your compelling argument has swayed me, and I will henceforth disregard all other opinions on the matter.
Seriously, put a bit of effort into it. Do any credible academics believe that there was one singular crossing over the Bering land bridge anymore? No, but simultaneously they all believe based on the available evidence that people did, indeed, cross the Bering land bridge. As I said before, the land bridge crossing hasn't been "debunked", it has been made more complicated, and all of this only applies to humans. Now you can either continue to pull the equivalent of putting your fingers in your ears, choosing your eyes, and saying "nuh uh" as loud as possible, or provide something more than assertions backed up by your totally credible say so. Your choice, but if you're looking for advice on convincing others instead of wondering why no one takes you seriously while you make your proclamations, I'd suggest the latter; but for my own amusement I'd prefer you take the format tact.
@@benjaminsmith3843 I don't care what you think you are wrong, educate yourself. I'm done arguing with the stupids.
@@butter7734 you never started arguing, so it's as good a time to stop as any I suppose. Baseless assertions aren't an argument. As for your command to "educate myself", I believe that's the root of our, well it isn't really a disagreement since only one of us is putting forth effort, but we can call it that regardless. Outside of native people condemning the Bering crossing based on the fact that they don't like it and it conflicts with their oral histories and religious beliefs, everyone is in agreement that yes, humans crossed into the Americas over the Bering land bridge. They also took a few other routes to get here, but the Bering land bridge was definitely involved based on the best available archeological and genetic evidence. You would know that if you bothered to read more than the handful of pieces that confirm your existing viewpoint and instead took the time to sample evidence from multiple sources, you know, have yourself a proper education on the matter, but that level of irony might be dangerous for someone so angrily close minded, so be careful.
Once upon a Time many many years ago my mother's barrel racing mare stole a bag of cooked pork chops that I was going to take camping and ate them after tearing the plastic bag open.
Roanoke is back! THE BOI IS IN THE BUILDING
In Philadelphia is where his brain is on display
Why do all your vids take so long to get to audio?
Personally I prefer to listen audio but we’re still 3 episodes behind in February I think
Sheep and goats can produce fertile offspring, but sheep and goats have the same number of chromosomes where horses and donkeys have a different number. Geeps (goat sheeps) have an even chromosome number, and mules have an odd chromosomes number
I thought that once you lost a trait you could not get it back, like that cat species that became vegetarian for a while (lost its canine teeth) & then it went back to eating meat, but it couldn't redevelop canine teeth so it made huge foreteeth like cartoon rabbits.
trd hat gained my respect
MORE BIGFOOT
Roanoke Tales? Based
And here I thought a Colt 45 was a Colt 1911, the more you know.
1:42:02 And welcome to having your favorite dinosaur be Spinosaurus. That changes about every day. And that’s not much of an exaggeration.
How often do you upload these to apple podcasts?
Aloha from where Bigfoot is not.
It will really help if you put links to guest youtube channel in description, For me as non-native eanglish speaker it is hard to know how to write from hearing.
I’m super late to this and the genetic topic got me back in something that’s always confused me. Genetics is one of those things where we may never fully understand it. By all things we know, if something like a Jack Russell or a Great Dane evolved in the wild naturally it’d be considered a species, yet we’ve done it in captivity and they’re not even considered a subspecies. And if we were to cross a JRT and a GD there’s a high chance of not only viable offspring, but offspring that can reproduce.
To bounce off that. Foxes and dogs aren’t able to reproduce and have viable offspring, yet there’s a living example of a Culepo, a South American Fox Species, and a domestic dog hybrid.
How much Neanderthal in modern humans… up to about 4% or so in Europeans.
All gaurds have to be 5"10 minimum at the old gaurd, so most soldiers are normally taller
look up "feathered dinosaurs aren't scary paleoart" and you'll change your mind quickly 😂 it's also theorized that the bigger dinosaurs by majority still did not have feathers, as at their size it would make them over heat in most climates of the day, trex being among them, and that trex was an ambush predator, so it probably wouldn't make any sound if it was hunting you. Also don't know what you mean about geese not being scary, you ever met a goose?
I was a dinosaur kid but it was velociraptors! Gonna make me sad, saying I'm not a real dino kid lol.
Okay, okay, my biggest favourites were pleisiosaur and elasmasaurus, I just have some thalassaphobia and don't like thinking about the big sea lizards, all the time. XD
Current favourite is compsognathus, if I'm spelling that right. I just like dinosaurs my height or smaller, at this point, lol.
Now I'm thinking about dinosaurs and keep thinking of more I adore.
Some armadillos have leprosy and you can get it from eating them. So, cannibalizing a leprosy victim and catching it that way works?
This guy from “lore lodge” got SMOKED by the UA-cam channel “Mindshock”!!!
I’ve noticed that lower IQ people tend to think “nuh uh lol” is an argument, but I promise you that he did not smoke me.
Ah, a welcomed team up to be sure.
Yes! Roanake and the Aidens
23:00 is the start of nonsense.
As a Kansan, we’ve had three feet plus tall grass since time premordium
Thick earth is based and I am stealing it
What if bigfoot has a digestive system like a beaver and eats wood
Beavers actually really dont eat wood. They eat the bark, and the nutritional layer right under the bark. They just chew wood to use them for the dam building material
@lalli8152 of course they don't eat the actual wood pulp but they have a specialized digestive system..maybe Bigfoot has a digestive system like a goat and can eat any and everything around them .
I thought they were talking about Florida people 😂
Careful with the flat earthers, they are good at Live Debates because they can just verbally Zerg Rush you.
Booooo stop talking at tell the story.
What's going on with the TrovaTrip?
NO STEP ON SNEK! NO STE ON SNEK!
You gotta read Monster by Frank Peretti
damn it I missed it!