With all these 4.0 features coming to 3.24.2, you could almost think that CIG genuinely had planned to release 4.0 around now (Q3), but the issues with freight elevators and persistent hangars in 3.23, and then 3.24, really screwed them over.
Not necessarily...now I know you're just going to shit on me for this, but I think they're putting in a lot of stuff now that they were going to put in 4.0 so that they can actually release 4.0 this year without needing to have the additional workload those other features would have given if they released them all at the same time. So, by the time they release it'll basically be more just releasing server meshing (which yeah is huge) and the star system of Pyro itself, but most of the newer gameplay mechanics and features will already have been released prior (though there will still be some unique stuff that will initially only be in Pyro, and of course thematically there's a lot of art direction and assets that will be Pyro-only for obvious reasons).
@@SpaceMike3 What's the point in being so pessimistic? Like, you don't have to go around saying "it's 100% releasing this year", but actively going "it's gonna be a super long time away still" is another weird extreme
What I always expected was that CIG would put 4.0 into extremely unstable and broken PTU for a long time and keep it there until they got a working version out and stretching the times between access waves to milk out some subscriptions when they finally get it stable for wider testing.
They need to include garages into these cargo elevators. Why the fuck do I always need to run all the way to retrieve my ATLS in the middle of the xl hangar.
Same on wala. I can send elevator on terminal but it goes auto-infinite loop loading and elevator never moves. Elevator itself is so tiny that crate stacking for junior need to be updated to 4, maybe 5 crates stacked high - junior 107scu to move on tiny pad @soaphelps
I played this earlier, I’m shocked you’re not on Evo with all your testing! I am, happy to try things for you! For now, new huds look gorgeous, but early evo buggy, power settings are changed to the blocks and the ship changes mentioned before are in, redeemer nerf, Connie buff etc. not tried combat yet though. graphics look generally better and noticeably so. Quite a lot on this patch.
I was looking forward to the MFD changes, having used them now, it’s going to take some getting used to. Lots of mouse buttons on the MFD. The HUD is going to take some getting used to. Everything was moved around, and the details are pretty small. Weapon presets is cool, but right now you only get one trigger, not two, so I’m not sure how useful it will be in practice. I expect many iterations though, throughout patch testing.
I can’t believe they are going forward with the Redeemer changes. Rebalancing is one thing but you can’t devalue the ship so it is worth less than what people paid for. Make changes if you need to but if people bought a $330 ship then the ship still needs to be worth $330. Otherwise you are ripping people off. Charge them $330 then make the sip worth far less. $240 you can get a Connie Andromeda AND a snub fighter that is superior to this new Redeemer in every stat and role capability. It is really disgusting what CIG is doing. How little respect they have for the money people have paid for that ship. How little they care about providing value to what people have pledged and how they do not look at feedback at all. The forum’s response to the changes to the Redeemer are 99% negative. Almost every comment is about the Deemer and 400i changes. Despite the moderators working overtime deleting posts and censoring the concerns they have not responded once to the outrage. Really gross treatment. I’m never pledging or making purchase out of game again. Not unless they listen to reason.
So, Redeemer has 6xS2 shields lowering the total shield hp but increasing redundancy. That makes it more effective when engineering comes in. And we're not taking into account armor, which the redeemer is supposed to have quite a bit of. Planned increase in maneuverability. The only measurable nerf is the change from S5 to S4 guns on turrets. The Andromeda is only getting an increase of turret guns from S2 to S3 which is not much. It has a single S3 shield, so it has more hp but no redundancy whatsoever. The component fails and you have no shields. I swear to god some people look at changes like they're final and things will stay exactly as they are, failing to think of any changes that are about to come too... Take a look at that list. All changes to shields are increasing redundancy and lowering total hp for combat oriented ships, while lowering redundancy and increasing hp for non combat ships. Doesn't that tell you something? Engineering + Armor.
@@polblanes You have it backwards, the Redeemer was made specifically to have strong shields, and less armor, so that it could be lighter(ish) and more maneuverable(in theory) while retaining firepower and it's tank like ability. "Shielding To assist in the ships maneuverability, the armor is lighter than expected. Because of this, an array of shields were added to help close this deficit." -StarCitizen(dot)tools While I can understand redundancy as your point, I don't know how well that will work out if it can't live long enough to have its redundant nature tested. The one benefit I could see from this, is that it's total shield regen time will be faster, as little as 15 seconds according to Erkul. Again though, I don't know how well this will work compared to other ships out there. TLDR: Take the Constellation Taurus for instance, 4x pilot manned S5 guns, two size 3 turrets, missiles, and 100,000 HP. Unless somehow this balance is made up with Redeemer Hyper maneuverability compared to the constellation, there's little reason to get the Redeemer. Other than the fact that perhaps, maybe, possibly, it can be better against fighters overall, and only just. Maybe I'm wrong, but I fear I'm not.
The Constellation Phoenix cargo grid has been messed up (floating independently of the floor) for awhile now. Those patch notes mention the Phoenix a couple of times-even a mention of the cargo bay-but I didn’t see anything about the grid malfunction specifically. Maybe I missed it. I’m not the only one with a floating cargo grid in the Phoenix, am I?
@@bobbyyoung3757 Good point. It seems unlikely they would have a hankering to change the actual geometry of the cargo bay all of a sudden. Hopefully “geometry” is some sort of in-house reference to “grid-related” functionality.
Most EVO testers were looking at "SERVER ERROR" more than anything. After several "SE", my Freight Elevator (FE) stopped responding and I could not store my Taurus. The Taurus could not be entered as I couldn't activate either elevator. After a few more SE while trying to use the inventory kiosk, I had an 8scu box inventory window open with my local inventory and another SE. When the SE ended, the 8scu inventory window replaced the local inventory window and I could no longer turn left or right. I could only use WASD to move forward/back and sideways. The mouse worked fine for F4 third person view, but could no longer turn or activate anything with the "F" button. Even ESC no longer opened the game settings window. Accessing the game console, I could see my inventory actions had been registered by the servers, but trying use /exit didn't work. Finally ended up just doing Alt-F4.
Still way less of a mountain to climb vs 3.24 - that patch took how many weeks until it was able to attempt having a playtest for the entire weekend ..this is just patch #2 of 3.24.2
This is cool, but I wish we'd get some more actual content (new types of missions for example) since the game has been very stale for months now. Cargo missions are just box deliveries with bigger boxes that take longer to unload so there was nothing to get excited about.
Their goal is actually much larger than that. Instead of static missions, they're creating a dynamic environment that will just fold and operate within itself. So you will not have loops.You'll have things you need to get done, but the loops will be blended into a natural environment.
finally CIg is doing something on the ships. It was ridiculous that they messed up the ships with master mode and then left it broken for 6 months. The player base suffered. At least they started to listen and move. I hope the toxic people start to smile a bit again instead of just pushing vitriol and hate. There is new hope for fun ship to ship again!
They also made MM suck ass even more. Now ships boost slower than a 747's cruise speed! Average speed of your space star fighter is that of a formula one race car! WTF!
New stability patch dropped saturday. A little better, but had a Server Error minutes after logging in which lasted a little over a minute. The boxes I left in my hangar Freight Elevator were still where I left them, unable to snap since there is no grid to snap to. Tried calling an ATLS, but it failed to rise with the hangar elevator deck. After that, ASOP would only time out with "Unable to Deal with Your Request At This Time". Claiming or calling other ships didn't make any difference.
@@drksideofthewal there is no longer an NDA with respect to talking about Evo, just can't show footage. In any event, I was being mildly facetious, but as much as he tests, it's just insane to me that they haven't offered him access. Or maybe they did, and he didn't want it.
cant believe you skipped over the most amazing bugfix - Fixed - PU - Cargo Elevators - Cargo elevators will not accept Ore Pods from mining vehicles. if that works it could make mining amazing in groups 😀
Thanks for your thorough analysis Fox. As usual very in-depth and interesting. Keep up the good work! However, is nobody going to mention that it looks like 4.0 is being pushed forward more and more again? 🤔🤫
I have seen the crying on spectrum already about the reduced bossted speed. What people complaining seem to forget is that in the next patch after that in the 4.0 patch ships have no health anymore, and your target shrinks down to component size. And depending on the weapons you use, you will need to get through the hull first before damaging the components in order to stop a ship. If boosted speed stays, ship fights between two fighters could take more than 15 mins.
On the redeemer cig should keep size 5 guns BUT if they want to nerf change them to default of lasers not ballistic gun. Then slow down the fire rate and max capacity
The ship resets are for the upcoming patch with actual functioning ingame ship power module's. I am guessing the added feature of the subsystem targeting and disabling and overheating of systems and everything else. They need to reduce the turret sizes for the Bucc. It is too powerful for it's class.
So many server errors in this build... makes testing stuff really difficult. By the time you finished filling in a new IC report, there are an extra 3 server errors, making progress through the regression testing list quite the arduous task.
This is literally the 2nd build and 2nd test of 3.24 ..what were you expecting - and were you there for the 1st builds of 3.24 and 3.24.1? --- how would you compare this patch so far vs patch #2 of those builds?
Way too much praises for MFDs. GUI look stupidly gimmickly gamy, sorry to hurt but its the truth! No combat or industrial space ship will ever look like having MFD GUI made by a website designer. I agree actual MFD are hard to read bit one in all. It was NOT the time to take care of MFD for other pressing matters exist in terms of functions and professions. Instead, yet another rush out of blue unrealistic bit hopefully very functional popart.
I've been deeply saddened by the Redeemer change, it feels unnecessary compared to the likes of the Constellation. I've had others point out the complete firepower and shield advantage of even the Taurus, a trading ship, as compared to the Redeemer. I know for some, the simple solution will be to sell it. Alas, I cannot. I've since made memories on that ship with that of a late departed friend, and I just can't bring myself to let it go. Perhaps it's ironic that the Redeemer was my first love in SC, only for CIG to kill it. Perhaps there is truly a better reason for this change that I just can't fathom as of now, perhaps I am rightly concerned. Time will tell.
As a side note, I do believe this will have me second guessing any further investment into Star Citizen at this time. If there is a special deal or ship of interest I may, but for the majority of matters I believe I'll reign it in at this time. I was thinking of purchasing the ATLS, but this latest change and nerf to a craft already purchased has led me to not proceed with the ATLS at this time. What else will the nerf post release? Seems like I can't trust it now, Helldiver's Syndrome all over again.
Oh neat I can't wait to navigate MFDs with my sticks. I replaced the analog sticks with 4-way hats so now I have 4 hats per stick, but I wonder what the chances are it will be bugged and still trigger ship control functions in addition to MFD navigations.
Oooh shinies... oh wait, I forgot that half will be cut, another quarter will be bugged and unusable, and the remaining will be useless waiting for things in the game not even Tier 0 yet... but oooh shinies!
If we check the "shaders" folder, we can see the "3.23-fw..." folder is being used and not the 3.24.. does it mean, we are actually in a 3.23.x build? :P
Means a select group of testers can play and provide input on patches before they come out to the PTU and when they are happy the patch goes live. They also get exclusive insight on up coming tech and are usually under an NDA, non disclosure agreement.
ooooooooookay lol I was part of this for Blizzard when my close friend worked there 😂 thought it might have been a group under Cloud Imperium that got paid a fee and such
@@ryanwho4433 You dont have to spend a dime beyond a starter package to get Evocati status ..ive upgraded beyond the starter but i have 2 friends that are also Evocati and have just $45 dollar starter packs
@@Zombiesmoker "Dont forget this is alpha testing." So was free masses, that's coming to an end at all costs. *Points at both sides elites meeting Pope pretending they're enemies* No one will believe you if you tell. Too many religious things like cons.
Uh oh..its bigger foot - the guy who told a SC streamer / youtuber who makes videos on SC to 'do his research' because SC has 50 player servers maximum. You havnt played SC in at Least 2 years, if ever --- so what do you need content for?.. your're in the comment section of every SC video and yet didnt know they made a player count change a couple years back? Crying on UA-cam is the only content you want and the only content you are going to get. - Edit: I looked at your channel, - that explains everything - and i apologize for teasing a disabled person.. i honestly didnt know.
@Biggerfoot it would appear that you're the only one being fooled here. While they do want players to do things, building does come first. It always has. It is you who sounds like the new player kicking and screaming about content, especially right now before citizencon and IAE.... This happens every year. In fact, this has been one of the better years. See, you just want them to release something that YOU like. They can release 8 new different things and if none of them interest you, you'll say 'wHeReS dA cOnTeNt!!' As if they haven't done anything.... Kindpy ait down and stop before you try to disrespect someone else. You come off as loud and dumb.....Without even realizing it..
Reducing the boost speed... Thank God! Not adjusting adjusting SCM or any other speed tuning 🙄 They should have just brought all the SCM speed up much closer to max boost instead of decreasing boost but at least they are trying to bring normal speed and boost speeds more in line with each other. Someone should just be fired from giving input on master modes. I don't know if that's Chris, Yogi, or both.
New character customization, well whoopky do, couldn't do without it. Wish they'd focus their energy on bug elimination instead. Game's barely playable to unplayable and no one is doing anything about it.
@@RedDwarf1that's exactly what you were talking about lmfao The people who create new character models and customisation options aren't the people who fix bugs lol, or would you rather the 3D artist tries their hand at fixing the code?
@@RedDwarf1 Artists are the ones working on character customisation. Network engineers are the ones who fix the server-related bugs and optimise the backend database for stability. Those are two completely different fields.
Everything mentioned for this patch got me excited, but then came the 2 words I don't like to see in the same sentence. Reduced Speed My excitement is now tempered, severely.
Hard to find anybody to fight - now that you cant just crank the throttle limiter to max and run away if the shields get compromised and with no tricording the chances of 2 ships of the exact same kind and 1 having a significant performance advantage by using that maneuver - is gone, so much higher chance of the shields getting tested. Maybe Master Modes DID ruin everything.. Pickers, Brios, Ghost Hollow and all the spots where the bad asses used to hang around are a ghost town
@@hawkzulu5671 people still just run away when their shields drop, because there is nothing to lose from switching to nav when you have no shields anyway. The only difference is you have a small delay before you can race off at 1000m/s. MM has changed little for fighters except make flight less fun. MM has, however, made combat in larger ships better. It's just a shame 90% of fighters had to get butchered for it though.
Nobody cares anymore. If you're investing in SC, you should just light your money on fire. The active player base is down so far (90% from last year) that you're going to see more and more ship sale events in the next three months than ever before. It's not a good look for CIG.
With all these 4.0 features coming to 3.24.2, you could almost think that CIG genuinely had planned to release 4.0 around now (Q3), but the issues with freight elevators and persistent hangars in 3.23, and then 3.24, really screwed them over.
Not necessarily...now I know you're just going to shit on me for this, but I think they're putting in a lot of stuff now that they were going to put in 4.0 so that they can actually release 4.0 this year without needing to have the additional workload those other features would have given if they released them all at the same time. So, by the time they release it'll basically be more just releasing server meshing (which yeah is huge) and the star system of Pyro itself, but most of the newer gameplay mechanics and features will already have been released prior (though there will still be some unique stuff that will initially only be in Pyro, and of course thematically there's a lot of art direction and assets that will be Pyro-only for obvious reasons).
They are probably adding what they can now so when they delay 4.0 to Q2 2025 it'll sting less.
@@SpaceMike3 What's the point in being so pessimistic? Like, you don't have to go around saying "it's 100% releasing this year", but actively going "it's gonna be a super long time away still" is another weird extreme
@@ChristoffRevanI agree. Static server meshing and Pyro will be plenty for 4.0
What I always expected was that CIG would put 4.0 into extremely unstable and broken PTU for a long time and keep it there until they got a working version out and stretching the times between access waves to milk out some subscriptions when they finally get it stable for wider testing.
Thank fuck they will be patching the God damn cargo elevators...
cant remember the name but on a moon at MT there must be 100 plus 8 scu crates
They need to include garages into these cargo elevators. Why the fuck do I always need to run all the way to retrieve my ATLS in the middle of the xl hangar.
Same on wala. I can send elevator on terminal but it goes auto-infinite loop loading and elevator never moves.
Elevator itself is so tiny that crate stacking for junior need to be updated to 4, maybe 5 crates stacked high - junior 107scu to move on tiny pad
@soaphelps
@@AbangSyaft A smaller elevator dedicated to ground vehicles, perhaps?
Thank you, fuck
I played this earlier, I’m shocked you’re not on Evo with all your testing!
I am, happy to try things for you!
For now, new huds look gorgeous, but early evo buggy, power settings are changed to the blocks and the ship changes mentioned before are in, redeemer nerf, Connie buff etc. not tried combat yet though.
graphics look generally better and noticeably so. Quite a lot on this patch.
I was looking forward to the MFD changes, having used them now, it’s going to take some getting used to. Lots of mouse buttons on the MFD. The HUD is going to take some getting used to. Everything was moved around, and the details are pretty small. Weapon presets is cool, but right now you only get one trigger, not two, so I’m not sure how useful it will be in practice. I expect many iterations though, throughout patch testing.
I can’t believe they are going forward with the Redeemer changes. Rebalancing is one thing but you can’t devalue the ship so it is worth less than what people paid for. Make changes if you need to but if people bought a $330 ship then the ship still needs to be worth $330. Otherwise you are ripping people off. Charge them $330 then make the sip worth far less. $240 you can get a Connie Andromeda AND a snub fighter that is superior to this new Redeemer in every stat and role capability. It is really disgusting what CIG is doing. How little respect they have for the money people have paid for that ship. How little they care about providing value to what people have pledged and how they do not look at feedback at all. The forum’s response to the changes to the Redeemer are 99% negative. Almost every comment is about the Deemer and 400i changes. Despite the moderators working overtime deleting posts and censoring the concerns they have not responded once to the outrage. Really gross treatment. I’m never pledging or making purchase out of game again. Not unless they listen to reason.
They are making room for next ship concept but will be wagging finger at MM balancing for cause to effect.
The 1% backing up redeemer changeS because it's nit 1st time is more likely a marketing vulture than a backer.
So, Redeemer has 6xS2 shields lowering the total shield hp but increasing redundancy. That makes it more effective when engineering comes in. And we're not taking into account armor, which the redeemer is supposed to have quite a bit of.
Planned increase in maneuverability.
The only measurable nerf is the change from S5 to S4 guns on turrets.
The Andromeda is only getting an increase of turret guns from S2 to S3 which is not much. It has a single S3 shield, so it has more hp but no redundancy whatsoever. The component fails and you have no shields.
I swear to god some people look at changes like they're final and things will stay exactly as they are, failing to think of any changes that are about to come too... Take a look at that list. All changes to shields are increasing redundancy and lowering total hp for combat oriented ships, while lowering redundancy and increasing hp for non combat ships. Doesn't that tell you something? Engineering + Armor.
@@polblanes You have it backwards, the Redeemer was made specifically to have strong shields, and less armor, so that it could be lighter(ish) and more maneuverable(in theory) while retaining firepower and it's tank like ability.
"Shielding
To assist in the ships maneuverability, the armor is lighter than expected. Because of this, an array of shields were added to help close this deficit." -StarCitizen(dot)tools
While I can understand redundancy as your point, I don't know how well that will work out if it can't live long enough to have its redundant nature tested. The one benefit I could see from this, is that it's total shield regen time will be faster, as little as 15 seconds according to Erkul. Again though, I don't know how well this will work compared to other ships out there.
TLDR: Take the Constellation Taurus for instance, 4x pilot manned S5 guns, two size 3 turrets, missiles, and 100,000 HP. Unless somehow this balance is made up with Redeemer Hyper maneuverability compared to the constellation, there's little reason to get the Redeemer. Other than the fact that perhaps, maybe, possibly, it can be better against fighters overall, and only just.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I fear I'm not.
Found a redeemer owner
we can Eva faster than ships soon slowing speeds down even more is fucking braindead
sounds like they added some really neat stuff in this patch, can't wait to see it hit the PTU soon!
That abandon mission change is needed badly, for sometimes bugs cause it.
The Constellation Phoenix cargo grid has been messed up (floating independently of the floor) for awhile now. Those patch notes mention the Phoenix a couple of times-even a mention of the cargo bay-but I didn’t see anything about the grid malfunction specifically. Maybe I missed it. I’m not the only one with a floating cargo grid in the Phoenix, am I?
It said something about cargo bay geometry, probably adjusting it so cargo sits on the floor properly.. maybe.
@@bobbyyoung3757 Good point. It seems unlikely they would have a hankering to change the actual geometry of the cargo bay all of a sudden. Hopefully “geometry” is some sort of in-house reference to “grid-related” functionality.
Most EVO testers were looking at "SERVER ERROR" more than anything. After several "SE", my Freight Elevator (FE) stopped responding and I could not store my Taurus. The Taurus could not be entered as I couldn't activate either elevator. After a few more SE while trying to use the inventory kiosk, I had an 8scu box inventory window open with my local inventory and another SE. When the SE ended, the 8scu inventory window replaced the local inventory window and I could no longer turn left or right. I could only use WASD to move forward/back and sideways. The mouse worked fine for F4 third person view, but could no longer turn or activate anything with the "F" button. Even ESC no longer opened the game settings window. Accessing the game console, I could see my inventory actions had been registered by the servers, but trying use /exit didn't work. Finally ended up just doing Alt-F4.
Still way less of a mountain to climb vs 3.24 - that patch took how many weeks until it was able to attempt having a playtest for the entire weekend ..this is just patch #2 of 3.24.2
All I need is confirmation a Nursa won't fit in a Zeus. Box dimension analysis is good, but I need some good ol fashioned thorough foxy science.
Ramp is too narrow
Ain’t gonna fit, sucks, but I get it.
This is cool, but I wish we'd get some more actual content (new types of missions for example) since the game has been very stale for months now. Cargo missions are just box deliveries with bigger boxes that take longer to unload so there was nothing to get excited about.
Their goal is actually much larger than that. Instead of static missions, they're creating a dynamic environment that will just fold and operate within itself. So you will not have loops.You'll have things you need to get done, but the loops will be blended into a natural environment.
@@1scrub2 yeah, eta 2035, in the meantime I'd like some static missions pls.
finally CIg is doing something on the ships. It was ridiculous that they messed up the ships with master mode and then left it broken for 6 months.
The player base suffered. At least they started to listen and move.
I hope the toxic people start to smile a bit again instead of just pushing vitriol and hate. There is new hope for fun ship to ship again!
They also made MM suck ass even more. Now ships boost slower than a 747's cruise speed! Average speed of your space star fighter is that of a formula one race car! WTF!
New stability patch dropped saturday. A little better, but had a Server Error minutes after logging in which lasted a little over a minute. The boxes I left in my hangar Freight Elevator were still where I left them, unable to snap since there is no grid to snap to. Tried calling an ATLS, but it failed to rise with the hangar elevator deck. After that, ASOP would only time out with "Unable to Deal with Your Request At This Time". Claiming or calling other ships didn't make any difference.
yaawwwwwwnnnn
I never thought Star Citizen was a scam until I found out that Foxy is not Evo.
A lot of content creators aren’t, so they can comment on leaks without being under NDA
@@drksideofthewal there is no longer an NDA with respect to talking about Evo, just can't show footage. In any event, I was being mildly facetious, but as much as he tests, it's just insane to me that they haven't offered him access. Or maybe they did, and he didn't want it.
cant believe you skipped over the most amazing bugfix - Fixed - PU - Cargo Elevators - Cargo elevators will not accept Ore Pods from mining vehicles. if that works it could make mining amazing in groups 😀
Thanks for your thorough analysis Fox. As usual very in-depth and interesting. Keep up the good work! However, is nobody going to mention that it looks like 4.0 is being pushed forward more and more again? 🤔🤫
What I really don't like is that CIG keep adding new features and ships and not fixing any old well known issues nor updating all ships we all love
This is a toxic positivity kind of video.
They literally are making Master modes 25% slower. Thats wild.
I have seen the crying on spectrum already about the reduced bossted speed. What people complaining seem to forget is that in the next patch after that in the 4.0 patch ships have no health anymore, and your target shrinks down to component size. And depending on the weapons you use, you will need to get through the hull first before damaging the components in order to stop a ship. If boosted speed stays, ship fights between two fighters could take more than 15 mins.
On the redeemer cig should keep size 5 guns BUT if they want to nerf change them to default of lasers not ballistic gun. Then slow down the fire rate and max capacity
The ship resets are for the upcoming patch with actual functioning ingame ship power module's. I am guessing the added feature of the subsystem targeting and disabling and overheating of systems and everything else. They need to reduce the turret sizes for the Bucc. It is too powerful for it's class.
I've tried a character creator only once. Never touched it since that. Just pressing random
Its already WWII dogfighting in space speeds, if it gets any slower it will be age of sail speeds....
Hello, how are you? Can you help us with the ROC-DS? The laser is not turning on?
Hull C for extended size feels like a piñata, if I were C driver, I would be scared
sue
hahaha -273 is absolute zero, wonder how fast you freeze there.
They need to give the crusader spirits more shield generators or let them have a better shield generator
I hope we can read the targeted components with missiles now. Font is too small.
Am i just sleeping or is this almost norhing lol?
|NO mention to 32 scu eggs.....
what about them
.... they made the ships even SLOWERER???
So many server errors in this build... makes testing stuff really difficult. By the time you finished filling in a new IC report, there are an extra 3 server errors, making progress through the regression testing list quite the arduous task.
This is literally the 2nd build and 2nd test of 3.24 ..what were you expecting - and were you there for the 1st builds of 3.24 and 3.24.1? --- how would you compare this patch so far vs patch #2 of those builds?
Lighten up, your thinking to much.....just play like the rest of us vets, we don't whine about little issues
who give a f about hair its abroken game
Way too much praises for MFDs.
GUI look stupidly gimmickly gamy, sorry to hurt but its the truth! No combat or industrial space ship will ever look like having MFD GUI made by a website designer.
I agree actual MFD are hard to read bit one in all. It was NOT the time to take care of MFD for other pressing matters exist in terms of functions and professions. Instead, yet another rush out of blue unrealistic bit hopefully very functional popart.
Opinions vary.
I've been deeply saddened by the Redeemer change, it feels unnecessary compared to the likes of the Constellation. I've had others point out the complete firepower and shield advantage of even the Taurus, a trading ship, as compared to the Redeemer.
I know for some, the simple solution will be to sell it. Alas, I cannot. I've since made memories on that ship with that of a late departed friend, and I just can't bring myself to let it go. Perhaps it's ironic that the Redeemer was my first love in SC, only for CIG to kill it. Perhaps there is truly a better reason for this change that I just can't fathom as of now, perhaps I am rightly concerned.
Time will tell.
As a side note, I do believe this will have me second guessing any further investment into Star Citizen at this time. If there is a special deal or ship of interest I may, but for the majority of matters I believe I'll reign it in at this time. I was thinking of purchasing the ATLS, but this latest change and nerf to a craft already purchased has led me to not proceed with the ATLS at this time. What else will the nerf post release? Seems like I can't trust it now, Helldiver's Syndrome all over again.
Freelancer component change is already in game
So the Zeus is not part of 3.24.2?
Oh neat I can't wait to navigate MFDs with my sticks. I replaced the analog sticks with 4-way hats so now I have 4 hats per stick, but I wonder what the chances are it will be bugged and still trigger ship control functions in addition to MFD navigations.
Sticks......primitive, use voice you caveman
Oooh shinies... oh wait, I forgot that half will be cut, another quarter will be bugged and unusable, and the remaining will be useless waiting for things in the game not even Tier 0 yet... but oooh shinies!
o7
If we check the "shaders" folder, we can see the "3.23-fw..." folder is being used and not the 3.24.. does it mean, we are actually in a 3.23.x build? :P
Word
Great news on the hauling reputation and cant wait to see the new DNA heads
Still nothing on fixing the Hull-C missions
My FL max already has 3 shield gens??
thanks for the fast update!
Who actually cares about caves?
Me
They have done wonderful work in caves.
It's not for me and feels clostrophobic but it's a nice change and value to those who seek... change
Cavemen.....Ugg
Good start with giving the MSR a size 3 now give it a speed boost.
Hummmm it seems they are all getting more or less -30% deceleration.
starcitizen
dot
com
it's been 6 months and I still don't know what Evocati means lol
Means a select group of testers can play and provide input on patches before they come out to the PTU and when they are happy the patch goes live. They also get exclusive insight on up coming tech and are usually under an NDA, non disclosure agreement.
Fancy word for high dollar backers, like using concierge and all that.
ooooooooookay lol I was part of this for Blizzard when my close friend worked there 😂 thought it might have been a group under Cloud Imperium that got paid a fee and such
@@ryanwho4433 You dont have to spend a dime beyond a starter package to get Evocati status ..ive upgraded beyond the starter but i have 2 friends that are also Evocati and have just $45 dollar starter packs
Max boost speed lowered for All ships omfg fast is fun but cig grrr
yes, this sux.
For what are these kind of Videos? I think most people can read patchnotes by themself 😂
theyre make the scam great agan
theyre du agan
Still sounds like featuers and not content WHERE IS THE GOD DAMN CONTENT
Content comes last. Dont forget this is alpha testing. Its not ment for them to focus on content now, fix bugs and add features first.
@@Zombiesmoker "Dont forget this is alpha testing." So was free masses, that's coming to an end at all costs. *Points at both sides elites meeting Pope pretending they're enemies* No one will believe you if you tell. Too many religious things like cons.
@@Zombiesmoker yea your a new player and not a smart guy, you got scammed xD that’s a complete lie, your just repeating something you want to be true
Uh oh..its bigger foot - the guy who told a SC streamer / youtuber who makes videos on SC to 'do his research' because SC has 50 player servers maximum. You havnt played SC in at Least 2 years, if ever --- so what do you need content for?.. your're in the comment section of every SC video and yet didnt know they made a player count change a couple years back?
Crying on UA-cam is the only content you want and the only content you are going to get. - Edit: I looked at your channel, - that explains everything - and i apologize for teasing a disabled person.. i honestly didnt know.
@Biggerfoot it would appear that you're the only one being fooled here. While they do want players to do things, building does come first. It always has. It is you who sounds like the new player kicking and screaming about content, especially right now before citizencon and IAE.... This happens every year. In fact, this has been one of the better years. See, you just want them to release something that YOU like. They can release 8 new different things and if none of them interest you, you'll say 'wHeReS dA cOnTeNt!!' As if they haven't done anything.... Kindpy ait down and stop before you try to disrespect someone else. You come off as loud and dumb.....Without even realizing it..
3.24.2 is an exciting patch.
Reducing the boost speed... Thank God! Not adjusting adjusting SCM or any other speed tuning 🙄 They should have just brought all the SCM speed up much closer to max boost instead of decreasing boost but at least they are trying to bring normal speed and boost speeds more in line with each other.
Someone should just be fired from giving input on master modes. I don't know if that's Chris, Yogi, or both.
They scared. The pressure is on. Ya'll can thank me.
?
3.24.2 is getting more bugs than we thought, Fixed it.
Maybe if your brain is small that is your simple minded conclusion
New character customization, well whoopky do, couldn't do without it. Wish they'd focus their energy
on bug elimination instead. Game's barely playable to unplayable and no one is doing anything about it.
The artists who scan and retopologically optimise the heads are not the same people who are working on network stability.
@@Billy-bc8pk I wasn't talking about network stability nor artists.
@@RedDwarf1that's exactly what you were talking about lmfao
The people who create new character models and customisation options aren't the people who fix bugs lol, or would you rather the 3D artist tries their hand at fixing the code?
who talks about char customs and network stability ?
@@RedDwarf1 Artists are the ones working on character customisation. Network engineers are the ones who fix the server-related bugs and optimise the backend database for stability. Those are two completely different fields.
Yogi decided to make this slow fighting game even slower by reducing boost max speeds....Master Modes is killing this game
Everything mentioned for this patch got me excited, but then came the 2 words I don't like to see in the same sentence.
Reduced
Speed
My excitement is now tempered, severely.
Hard to find anybody to fight - now that you cant just crank the throttle limiter to max and run away if the shields get compromised and with no tricording the chances of 2 ships of the exact same kind and 1 having a significant performance advantage by using that maneuver - is gone, so much higher chance of the shields getting tested. Maybe Master Modes DID ruin everything.. Pickers, Brios, Ghost Hollow and all the spots where the bad asses used to hang around are a ghost town
@@hawkzulu5671 people still just run away when their shields drop, because there is nothing to lose from switching to nav when you have no shields anyway. The only difference is you have a small delay before you can race off at 1000m/s. MM has changed little for fighters except make flight less fun.
MM has, however, made combat in larger ships better. It's just a shame 90% of fighters had to get butchered for it though.
@@stuartriddell2461 The PVP larpers can still joust at the renaissance fair. All hope is not losteth
Foxy deserves Evo. This channel shows actual game testing game play!
Nobody cares anymore. If you're investing in SC, you should just light your money on fire. The active player base is down so far (90% from last year) that you're going to see more and more ship sale events in the next three months than ever before. It's not a good look for CIG.