IMAM NAWAWI IS A MUSHRIK ACCORDING TO THE NAJDIS?!?!?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 сер 2024
  • The Neo Najdis behave inconsistently and are drowning in hypocrisies due to their Plastic Flimsy Methodology.
    This video will provide an example of the cognitive dissonance of the Neo Najdis who are a truly closet takfeeris.
    #brohajji
    #salafi
    #takfir

КОМЕНТАРІ • 54

  • @BroHajji
    @BroHajji  2 роки тому +14

    The Neo Najdis behave inconsistently and are drowning in hypocrisies due to their Plastic Flimsy Methodology.
    This video will provide an example of the cognitive dissonance of the Neo Najdis who are a truly closet takfeeris.
    #brohajji
    #salafi
    #takfir

    • @bacteria5184
      @bacteria5184 2 роки тому

      Aslam w. bro hajji which is the best books for aqeeda for beginners and intermediate?

    • @ZubairAhmed-od2xv
      @ZubairAhmed-od2xv Рік тому

      Yo. Bro Haaji..git your attention ?
      Salaam alaikum.
      Here's a little known, rarely used point, that always stumps the mujassima..
      They say Allah has a hand
      I say , tell me where .
      Show your daleel.
      But they can't.
      Nowhere I'm the Quran does Allah say , literally , I have a hand....
      So to say Allah has a hand , is to ascribe, to Allah that which he hasn't ascribed to himself ..
      Then they say, Ahh yes ,but Allah says his hand is above theirs, and other such ayaat..
      To which I ask, what does the ayaa mean?..because it doesn't literally say, Allah has a hand..and there is the argument , no where does Allah say in the Quran...I have a hand..
      And as we all know, we do not say about Allah that which hasn't said about himself..

  • @FettyChico
    @FettyChico 2 роки тому +8

    IM GLAD U MADE THIS VIDEO BRO HAJJI. i remember when saajid limpham friend last year or earlier this year said imam nawawi was a dodgy scholar i was shocked...saajid stayed silent but he may agree i dont know but these people do need to be called out for saying stupid stuff.

    • @mohammednadat6294
      @mohammednadat6294 2 роки тому

      Where did he say this? Can you point me to the video?

    • @FettyChico
      @FettyChico 2 роки тому

      @@mohammednadat6294 it was one of the videos of Mohammed hijab when he refuted saajid lipham...it was long time ago...il try find it but best type in Mohammed hijab saajid lipham

  • @Hamuzi1i
    @Hamuzi1i 2 роки тому +6

    This must be a joke right?! Subhan’allah the jahl is over the roof...

  • @sucatoe
    @sucatoe 2 роки тому +1

    I don't know Arabic too well so all I can do is trust your translation brother

  • @ImranKhan-iq3rk
    @ImranKhan-iq3rk 2 роки тому +2

    Anyone knows the name of the nasheed at the end??

  • @LayCritic
    @LayCritic Рік тому +1

    Assalamu aleikum! Where is your promised video on tawassul and istighatha?

  • @MrRiz157
    @MrRiz157 2 роки тому

    So glad you're exposing these people and false claims against the salaf
    Finally someone who isn't linked to sufism or Barelivi is calling out salafi founders.

  • @AbuWilly.
    @AbuWilly. 2 роки тому +15

    I do tawassul through Shaykh Al Islam Bro Hajji and also istigatha. I also do tabaruk with your videos and Instagram pictures, sometimes using your tweets.

    • @mohammedadil2823
      @mohammedadil2823 2 роки тому +6

      Bruh 😂

    • @mosesr255
      @mosesr255 2 роки тому +4

      Too funny bro

    • @AbuWilly.
      @AbuWilly. 2 роки тому +5

      @@mosesr255 Shukrun Akhi, I always try my best.

    • @Munkireal
      @Munkireal Рік тому

      Do some tabarruk with your sky god that runs.

    • @Smz1sh
      @Smz1sh Рік тому

      @@Munkireal you should tell the prophet ﷺ what he thinks about you saying “sky god”

  • @kernel1kadafi
    @kernel1kadafi 2 роки тому +1

    No way i cant believe they saying this

  • @mobmotivation6797
    @mobmotivation6797 Місяць тому

    I've heard he was a Jahmiyya

  • @ReturningRuh
    @ReturningRuh 2 роки тому +11

    Refutations of Al Wahabiyya:
    - Dahlan, al-Sayyid Ahmad ibn Zayni
    (d. 1304/1886).
    Mufti of Mecca and Shaykh al-Islam (highest religious authority in the Ottoman jurisdiction) for the Hijaz region: Al-Durar al-saniyyah fi al-radd ala al-Wahhabiyyah.
    [“The Pure Pearls in Answering the Wahhabis”] pub. Egypt 1319 & 1347 H;
    Fitnat al-Wahhabiyyah.
    [“The Wahhabi Fitna”];
    Khulasat al-Kalam fi bayan Umara’ al-Balad al-Haram.
    [“The Summation Concerning the Leaders of the Sacrosanct Country”], a history of the Wahhabi fitna in Najd and the Hijaz.
    - Al-Dajwi, Hamd Allah:
    Al-Basa’ir li Munkiri al-tawassul ka amthal Muhd. Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab.
    [“The Evident Proofs Against Those Who Deny the Seeking of Intercession Like Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab”].
    - Shaykh al-Islam Dawud ibn Sulayman al-Baghdadi al-Hanafi (1815-1881 CE):
    Al-Minha al-Wahbiyya fi radd al-Wahhabiyya.
    [“The Divine Dispensation Concerning the Wahhabi Deviation”];
    Ashadd al-Jihad fi Ibtal Da’wa al-Ijtihad.
    [“The Most Violent Jihad in Proving False Those Who Falsely Claim Ijtihad”].
    - Al-Falani al-Maghribi, al-Muhaddith Salih:
    Authored a large volume collating the answers of scholars of the Four Schools to Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab.
    - Al-Habibi, Muhammad ‘Ashiq al-Rahman:
    ‘Adhab Allah al-Mujdi li Junun al-Munkir al-Najdi.
    [“Allah’s Terrible Punishment for the Mad Rejector From Najd”].
    - Al-Haddad, al-Sayyid al-‘Alawi ibn Ahmad ibn Hasan ibn al-Qutb
    - Sayyidi ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Alawi al-Haddad al-Shafi’i:
    Al-Sayf al-batir li ‘unq al-munkir ‘ala al-akabir.
    [“The Sharp Sword for the Neck of the Assailant of Great Scholars”]. Unpublished manuscript of about 100 folios; Misbah al-anam wa jala’ al-zalam fi radd shubah al-bid’i al-najdi al-lati adalla biha al-‘awamm.
    [“The Lamp of Mankind and the Illumination of Darkness Concerning the Refutation of the Errors of the Innovator From Najd by Which He Had Misled the Common People”].
    Published 1325H.
    - Al-Hamami al-Misri, Shaykh Mustafa: Ghawth al-‘ibad bi bayan al-rashad.
    [“The Helper of Allah’s Servants According to the Affirmation of Guidance”].
    - Al-Hilmi al-Qadiri al-Iskandari, Shaykh Ibrahim:
    Jalal al-haqq fi kashf ahwal ashrar al-khalq.
    [“The Splendor of Truth in Exposing the Worst of People]
    (pub. 1355H).
    - Al-Husayni, ‘Amili, Muhsin (1865-1952). Kashf al-irtiyab fi atba’ Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab.
    [“The Dispelling of Doubt Concerning the Followers of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab”]. [Yemen?]:
    Maktabat al-Yaman al-Kubra, 198?.
    - Al-Kabbani, Muhammad Hisham, Encyclopedia of Islamic Doctrine, vol. 1-7, As-Sunnah Foundation of America, 1998.
    _____, Islamic Beliefs and Doctrine According to Ahl as-Sunna -
    A Repudiation of “Salafi” Innovations, ASFA, 1996.
    _____, Innovation and True Belief:
    The Celebration of Mawlid According to the Qur’an and Sunna and the Scholars of Islam, ASFA, 1995.
    _____, Salafi Movement Unveiled, ASFA, 1997.
    - Ibn ‘Abd al-Latif al-Shafi’i, ‘Abd Allah: Tajrid sayf al-jihad ‘ala mudda’i al-ijtihad [“The drawing of the sword of jihad. against the false claimants to ijtihad”].
    - The family of Ibn ‘Abd al-Razzaq al-Hanbali in Zubara and Bahrayn possess both manuscript and printed refutations by scholars of the Four Schools from Mecca, Madina, al-Ahsa’, al-Basra, Baghdad, Aleppo, Yemen and other Islamic regions.
    - Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab al-Najdi, ‘Allama al-Shaykh Sulayman, elder brother of Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab:
    Al-Sawa’iq al-Ilahiyya fi al-radd ‘ala al-Wahhabiyya.
    [“Divine Lightnings in Answering the Wahhabis”]. Ed. Ibrahim Muhammad al-Batawi. Cairo: Dar al-insan, 1987.
    Offset reprint by Waqf Ikhlas, Istanbul: Hakikat Kitabevi, 1994.
    Prefaces by Shaykh Muhammad ibn Sulayman al-Kurdi al-Shafi’i and Shaykh Muhammad Hayyan al-Sindi (Muhammad Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab’s shaykh) to the effect that Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab is “dall mudill” (“misguided and misguiding”).
    - Ibn ‘Abidin al-Hanafi, al-Sayyid Muhammad Amin:
    Radd al-muhtar ‘ala al-durr al-mukhtar, Vol. 3, Kitab al-Iman, Bab al-bughat.
    [“Answer to the Perplexed:
    A Commentary on “The Chosen Pearl,”” Book of Belief, Chapter on Rebels].
    Cairo:
    Dar al-Tiba’a al-Misriyya, 1272 H.
    - Ibn ‘Afaliq al-Hanbali, Muhammad Ibn ‘Abdul Rahman:
    Tahakkum al-muqallidin bi man idda’a tajdid al-din.
    [Sarcasm of the muqallids against the false claimants to the Renewal of Religion].
    A very comprehensive book refuting the Wahhabi heresy and posting questions which Ibn ‘Abdul Wahhab and his followers were unable to answer for the most part.
    - Ibn Dawud al-Hanbali, ‘Afif al-Din ‘Abd Allah:
    As-sawa’iq wa al-ru’ud.
    [“Lightnings and thunder”], a very important book in 20 chapters.
    According to the Mufti of Yemen Shaykh al-‘Alawi ibn Ahmad al-Haddad, the mufti of Yemen,
    “This book has received the approval of the ‘ulama of Basra, Baghdad, Aleppo, and Ahsa’ [Arabian peninsula].
    It was summarized by Muhammad ibn Bashir the qadi of Ra’s al-Khayma in Oman.”
    - Ibn Ghalbun al-Libi also wrote a refutation in forty verses of al-San’ani’s poem in which the latter had praised Ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab.
    It is in Samnudi’s Sa’adat al-darayn and begins thus:
    Salami ‘ala ahlil isabati wal-rushdi
    Wa laysa ‘ala najdi wa man halla fi najdi
    [My salutation is upon the people of truth and guidance
    And not upon Najd nor the one who settled in Najd]
    - Ibn Khalifa ‘Ulyawi al-Azhari:
    Hadhihi ‘aqidatu al-salaf wa al-khalaf fi dhat Allahi ta’ala wa sifatihi wa af’alihi wa al-jawab al-sahih li ma waqa’a fihi al-khilaf min al-furu’ bayna al-da’in li al-Salafiyya wa atba’ al-madhahib al-arba’a al-islamiyya.
    [“This is the doctrine of the Predecessors and the Descendants concerning the divergences in the branches between those who call to al-Salafiyya and the followers of the Four Islamic Schools of Law”]
    (Damascus: Matba’at Zayd ibn Thabit, 1398/1977).
    - Kawthari al-Hanafi, Muhammad Zahid. Maqalat al-Kawthari.
    (Cairo: al-Maktabah al-Azhariyah li al-Turath, 1994).
    - Al-Kawwash al-Tunisi, ‘Allama Al-Shaykh Salih:
    His refutation of the Wahhabi sect is contained in Samnudi’s volume:
    “Sa’adat al-darayn fi al-radd ‘ala al-firqatayn.”
    - Khazbek, Shaykh Hasan:
    Al-maqalat al-wafiyyat fi al-radd ‘ala al-Wahhabiyyah.
    [“Complete Treatise in Refuting the Wahhabis”].
    - Makhluf, Muhammad Hasanayn:
    Risalat fi hukm al-tawassul bil-anbiya wal-awliya.
    [“Treatise on the Ruling Concerning the Use of Prophets and Saints as Intermediaries”].
    - Al-Maliki al-Husayni, Al-muhaddith Muhammad al-Hasan ibn ‘Alawi: Mafahimu yajibu an tusahhah.
    [“Notions that should be corrected”]
    4th ed.
    (Dubai: Hashr ibn Muhammad Dalmuk, 1986); Muhammad al-insanu al-kamil [“Muhammad, the Perfect Human Being”] 3rd ed.
    (Jeddah: Dar al-Shuruq, 1404/1984).
    - Al-Mashrifi al-Maliki al-Jaza’iri:
    Izhar al-‘uquq mimman mana’a al-tawassul bil nabi wa al-wali al-saduq. [“The Exposure of the Disobedience of Those Who Forbid Using the Intermediary of the Prophets and the Truthful Saints].
    - Al-Mirghani al-Ta’ifi, ‘Allama ‘Abd Allah ibn Ibrahim (d. 1793):
    Tahrid al-aghbiya’ ‘ala al-Istighatha bil-anbiya’ wal-awliya.
    [“The Provocations of the Ignorant Against Seeking the Help of Prophets and Saints”]
    (Cairo: al-Halabi, 1939).
    - Mu’in al-Haqq al-Dehlawi (d. 1289): Sayf al-Jabbar al-maslul ‘ala a’da’ al-Abrar.
    [“The Sword of the Almighty Drawn Against the Enemies of the Pure Ones”].
    - Al-Muwaysi al-Yamani, ‘Abd Allah ibn ‘Isa:
    Unpublished manuscript of a refutation of the Wahhabi sect.
    - Al-Nabahani al-Shafi’i, al-qadi al-muhaddith Yusuf ibn Isma’il (1850-1932): Shawahid al-Haqq fi al-istighatha bi sayyid al-Khalq (s).
    [“The Proofs of Truth in the Seeking of the Intercession of the Prophet”].
    - Al-Qabbani al-Basri al-Shafi’i, Allama Ahmad ibn ‘Ali:
    A manuscript treatise in approximately 10 chapters.
    - Al-Qadumi al-Nabulusi al-Hanbali: ‘AbdAllah: Rihlat [“Journey”].
    - Al-Qazwini, Muhammad Hasan,
    (d. 1825).
    Al-Barahin al-jaliyyah fi raf’ tashkikat al-Wahhabiyah.
    [“The Plain Demonstrations That Dispel the Aspersions of the Wahhabis”].
    Ed. Muhammad Munir al-Husayni al-Milani. 1st ed. Beirut: Mu’assasat al-Wafa’, 1987.

    • @anokata9929
      @anokata9929 2 роки тому +1

      noone gonna read that copy paste

    • @ReturningRuh
      @ReturningRuh 2 роки тому +2

      @@anokata9929 nobody takes you serious. You jump from each comment box without education because you’ve been brain washed.

  • @ayatollahkhamenei8768
    @ayatollahkhamenei8768 2 роки тому +1

    I pray for peace in the ummah. Sunnis and Shia should unite.

    • @s-a6202
      @s-a6202 2 роки тому +3

      some shia curse the sahaba and muslims cant align themselves with those people

  • @DigitalWorldOrganization
    @DigitalWorldOrganization 2 роки тому +3

    Stop influencing the devision between muslims. You are following the footsteps of Madkhalis.

    • @DigitalWorldOrganization
      @DigitalWorldOrganization 2 роки тому +1

      @@mrty5213 Najdies are not one man. I don't care what this shaikh or that shaikh said. You can't blame muslims in geographical location just because you disagree with some shaikhs among them.

    • @DigitalWorldOrganization
      @DigitalWorldOrganization 2 роки тому

      @@mrty5213 there is nothing call whole core. Our core is Mahamed صلى الله عليه وسلم . . and I still saying same thing. Because you disagree with some shaikhs you categories the whole geographical location. Same as Madkhalis.

    • @s-a6202
      @s-a6202 2 роки тому

      @@DigitalWorldOrganization you are right akhi

    • @MichiganTroopers123
      @MichiganTroopers123 2 місяці тому

      Whoever agrees with Mohammad Ibn Abdul wahab and the likes of him then we trust Allah will deal with them justly for their oppression and arrogance

  • @ReturningRuh
    @ReturningRuh 2 роки тому +5

    Imam Isa Al Qudumi رحمه الله even labeled them as khawarij
    Also,
    Imam Muhammad Sulaiman Al-Kurdi, may Allah be pleased with him, reiterated numerous times,
    Praise be to Allah Alone. There is no doubt in that the knowledge of deriving rulings is taken from scholars. So whoever has his books as his shaikh, then his mistakes are more than when he is correct. The claims of absolute ijtihad today are generally coming from the slave who is far from it. Imams Ar-Rafi`ii, An-Nawawi and those who preceded them, like Fakhr ud-Din Ar-Razi, have come to agree then as today that there are no absolute mujtahids. Imam Ibn Hajar Al-Haitami has mentioned in his rulings that there has not been an absolute mujtahid since Imam Ash-Shafi`ii and his contemporaries. Imam Ibn as-Salah said it has been more than three centuries since an absolute mujtahid has existed. [22]
    The Imam says further,
    So the one who is claiming this, it is necessary such a one return to the truth and abandon false hopes. With regard to his calling Muslims unbelievers, then it has been explicitly stated by the Messenger of Allah, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him, “When the man says to the other, ‘Unbeliever!’ Then one of them is an unbeliever.” So the one who is throwing such a charge at a Muslim is the unbeliever according to Ash-Sharh ul-Kabir by Imam ar-Rafi`ii. [23]
    The Imam continues,
    This is because he is calling Islam kufr, and this is followed by Imam An-Nawawi and is the depended upon ruling for the latter day scholars of the School.[24]
    Imam Ahmad As-Sawi,[47] may Allah be pleased with him, the great Maliki judge and jurist, said of this movement,
    Allah has said, Humanity, the Promise of Allah is true. So do not be deceived about the life of this world and do not let the Deceiver lead you astray about Allah.[48] This ayah was said to have been sent down regarding the Khawarij who corrupted the meaning of the Book and the Sunnah and did this to make the blood and wealth of the Muslims permissible to be spilled and taken. This very thing can be witnessed now in their companions in a cult that appeared in Al-Hijaz by the name of the Wahhabis.
    They think that they are upon something, but they are only liars. Shaitan has taken a hold of them and caused them to forget the Remembrance of Allah. These people are the group of Shaitan. Are not the group of Shaitan the losers? We ask Allah the Generous that He wipe them out and exterminate all trace of them from the land.
    Imam Hasan Ash-Shatti,[53] may Allah be pleased with him, mentioned,
    I have read this general message with regard to the matter of Revealed Law as it relates to some doubts that were raised by some ignorant people, who do not necessitate kufr in principle, while some of it may be beneficial in consideration. Ibn `Abdul Wahhab has declared them to be unbelievers due to this action as stated in this letter, in addition to his declaring their blood and wealth licit for spilling and seizure.
    This belief was reached due to what appeared to their people by the outward import of the explicitly worded texts of Revealed Law built upon their founder’s ignorance, hatred and bad thoughts about the believers. May Allah curse whoever has this creed, for indeed, whoever declared a believer to be a unbeliever has already committed kufr.[

  • @yeshuasage3724
    @yeshuasage3724 Рік тому +1

    I always wondered where people got the idea that the salaf were a united body that agreed on aqeeda and only differed in fiqh issues
    This is absolutely fantasy, no historical basis, the salaf differed on everything apart from la ilaha illa allah muhamad rasulullah
    The idea of ijma3 is myth

  • @Theirishmuslim
    @Theirishmuslim 2 роки тому +2

    Alhamdullah brother keep doing what you do knowledge is worth while

    • @nadjiguemarful
      @nadjiguemarful 2 роки тому +2

      Salam Wa Alaykum I'm from Algeria we love Irish Celtic legends lol ❤️ Your people command good and forbid evil in the world I hope Allah swt raises them and I thank Him for guiding you to Islam bro

    • @Theirishmuslim
      @Theirishmuslim 2 роки тому +2

      @@nadjiguemarful I wish for my whole island of birth to be of the faith of islam one day inshallah

  • @أسد_مبين
    @أسد_مبين Рік тому

    This guy is freaking grave worshiper

    • @DrasscoOfRascia
      @DrasscoOfRascia 11 місяців тому +1

      He literally disavows it in this video

    • @KD-rl5kz
      @KD-rl5kz 8 місяців тому

      @@DrasscoOfRasciahe has admitted that he would rub the prophets grave than rub his face the mushrik

    • @Ghiyassudin
      @Ghiyassudin 5 місяців тому

      @@KD-rl5kz The Major Imam of Fiqh Ishāq Ibn Rahwayh (d. 238) said:
      "It has been from the very beginning the practice of whoever went on pilgrimage to pass by Medina and be sure to perform prayer in the Mosque of the Messenger of Allah and obtain
      Blessing by beholding his Rawda, his Pulpit, And his Grave, as well as where he sat, where his hands touched, where his feet walked, the pillar against which he leaned, and where Jibril descended on him with revelation, and obtain blessing through whoever frequented it and made sure to visit it among the Companions and the Imams of the Muslims, and to reflect upon all that and follow it's example."
      - Qadi Iyad's, Shīfa [p:585]
      ʾImām ʿAbd Allāh ibn ʾAḥmad ibn Ḥanbal (d. 290 AH) said:
      I asked him (i.e., ʾImām ʾAḥmad) about the person that touches the minbar of the Prophet ﷺ, seeking blessings by touching it and kissing it, and does the same to the grave, or as such, seeking blessings from Allāh the Almighty. He said, "There is nothing wrong with that."
      ╾ Al-ʿIlal, 2/492
      He also made several videos on this subject.
      Is Imam Ahmad a Mushrik according to you ?

    • @Munkireal
      @Munkireal Місяць тому

      @@KD-rl5kzhow does that make one a mushrik?

  • @أسد_مبين
    @أسد_مبين 11 місяців тому +1

    This guy 😂 has made Deen as refutation. Attacking ppl and debating

  • @safinoori8
    @safinoori8 2 роки тому +2

    Comparing sheikh Mohammad ibn Abdul wahhab to extremist jihadis is like comparing hajji to shaykh Albanian. Sheikh Mohammad has errors but his books do not encourage takfeer. Kufr and shirk vs making takfeer are very different topics. As for the sources your quoting it should be from the people themselves not from some random joe no one knows or some person who has a biased view towards the shaikhs dawah. As for imam nawawi and ibn hajar the sheikh never made takfeer of them or the ash ariya school. Making tawasul with the prophet is not always shirk . Look at usool thalatha wallahi you will realize the in depth knowledge of the sheikh . I can’t accept everything without concrete evidence going to the man himself . Even amongst the people of firawn their was good and bad. With the followers of imam abu hanifa there is extremist and good intellectual. Stop coloring everyone with the same brush. Allahul mustaan

    • @nadjiguemarful
      @nadjiguemarful 2 роки тому +5

      I believe in Wahdat al Wujud can you explain to me why thats Shirk? Muhammad SAWS said "Let none of you complain against time, for Allah is time" (Al Muwatta, Kitaab al Kalaam) Al Nawawi said this was a metaphor to convert to the Arabs who used to curse time when calamities happen, that everything that happens including calamities through time is revealed from Allah swt and willed by Him.. So that's how I read the poetry about Wahdat Al Wujud.. It's the same reasoning can you explain why MIAW killed fellow Muslims for speaking this way when Rasoul Allah ASWS spoke the same way? Please have a honest discussion without making Takfir if you can

  • @abdullahassaffah
    @abdullahassaffah Рік тому

    Deep inside madkhalis like No one except for their own few scholsrs they follow of the classical they prefer scholars of the deviant Zahiri madhab they love and promote
    Zahiri and makdhali hence have many things in common such as extreme in refutation bad manners no wisdom poor understanding of fish and how to use hadith and dawah