This monitor currently has a MASSIVE discount of 40% off (looks like I timed this upload perfectly lol). There are two versions of the 45" LG UltraGear OLED: ⮕ With USB-C Connectivity and Built-In Speakers (45GS96QB): geni.us/LG45GS96QB ⮕ Without USB-C Connectivity and Built-In Speakers (45GS95QE): geni.us/45GS95QE
I enjoyed this review a lot! Most reviewers appear in the video more than the actual monitor. You show more of the monitor and a good selection of various games. I also like it when you show yourself using it, 3:06, helps with scale.
The "Why Curve is important" section was excellent! I've *never* seen anyone else explain this concept better! Great review but I'll be waiting for a higher PPI version, ideally a 38" 3840x1600p OLED since 5120x2160p won't be easily drivable
I have it . Its the best Ultrawide for gaming period in my view. I don't need 4k gaming. Its the perfect size with at 45 inch 21;9 aspect ratio. OLED is a game changer. Im never going back.
Why everyone just blabs about never going back? Should I say when I bought 5800X3d that I never going back to ryzen 3600? Or that I will never use 1080ti in the future after I got rx6800?
1440p is perfect for gaming though, and this monitor is a gaming-oriented monitor after all. Even my RTX 3090 struggles to run many games at 100+ FPS in 4K. There's also no 4K version of this monitor...and won't be until some unannounced time in 2025. It will also cost significantly more. I'm not bashing 4K, I love 4K gaming monitors. But for now I still think this is the best Ultrawide OLED gaming monitor currently available.
@@CreatedTech Thats your opinion but the resolution is not it. Also super misleading not having it written... anywhere and left out of your specs section.
@@CreatedTech I currently play on a LG 38" 3840x1600 LED, and I look very much forward to the 5120x2160 240hz Oled's coming next year - as I do wish for a bit more pixels, a bit more hz, and to move to OLED :) I do even on this monitor notice that it could do better with a slightly higher pixel density - but that is really all about how far from the monitor you sit :) I can easily imagine 45" 1440p quickly being a bit blurry on a regular computer desk though - as there is not enough room to move it further back if having a wall behind. Even if I aim for higher ress myself, I think the 1440p is a good sweetspot for more users nowadays since higher ress takes too much computer power to run smooth. I currently run this monitor with a 4090 card, and expect having to use a 5090 for a 5120x2160
And price will be 3000 USD, not worth it. Great monitor for sure, but you need an absolute beast PC to even run that resolution and be able to even reach 100 fps. Very future proof monitor but it will be too expensive IMHO.
@@JM-cl7cm i would to, but theres no way im still not waiting a few months again after its out, if the prices fall as fast as they did iwth this years model, I would bite me in the ass if I buy it for full price
thanks for this review. I complete my purchase yesterday after a really depth investigation. After wathcing your review I firmly believe that I made the right choice.
You re going to be so dissapointed. I ve returned mine, the fucking curve is too aggresive and too much pixel on the screen not suitable for internet browsing!!!😢
Don't listen to the hater who replied to your comment. You'll probably love this monitor. The curve is great and super immersive, and 1440p resolution is really not a big deal. It's not great for reading text but it's awesome for gaming.
I have this monitor and it is absolutely incredible for first person shooters. So immersive. The curve is aggressive but you get used to it quick and I love it. I will say this though, despite my love for this monitor. Starcraft 2 gameplay looks wonky. The curve really warps the field that should appear flat. Just thought I would throw that out there for the RTS fans.
Over the summer, I upgraded from an IPS LCD Asus 27" ROG monitor to the Alienware AW3225QF - a 32" QD-OLED 4K display. Going OLED was an absolutely massive upgrade, especially for gaming, and the colours and everything looks absolutely amazing! Not to mention HDR looks so much better than it did on a LCD with no local dimming zones.
This an excellent review. I owned a G9 Odyessy 49" for years and switched to this. I cannot state how much I missed the verticle pixels but didn't know it. This paired with a high end gaming rig will absolutely crush any game and provide an amazing experience of silky smooth movement with vibrant visuals. It is the sweet spot imo, performance meets visual fidelity. 50 series cards will be able to do this better at 4k, if you have a 30 or 40 series card, 1440p is the way to go if you want the best of both worlds.
Yeah the shorter vertical height of the Samsung 49" is just wayyy too restrictive IMO. I feel like the edges are wasted too. I'd rather those pixels on top than to the side.
This video is interesting to me. I went from a 34in led 144 hz with a 27in 144 hz on the side for gaming and surfing. Just got the 49in Samsung Friday on Black Friday deal. I am super hyped about it. A little nervous about burn in as it’s my first oled. But that led me to researching more and found this comparison. I’m not opposed to returning it and getting this monitor but to be honest I’m not sure I’d like the aggressive curve on the lg.
I use it for Sim racing, it's fantastic. But the 5k/2k version will be out soon, I recommend most folks wait for that if you plan on sitting close to it. For gaming though, this 1440p version is great, less pixels to push.
It definitely is. You don't even need to sit close to notice it and no amount of anti aliasing is going to help you when gaming. You can simply not notice the less-sharp image even when you sit far enough. 1440p is good at 27" and 4k at 32" and beyond. This monitor is just not it.
I bought the first Gen of UW monitor back in 2017 or if it was 2016, anyway, I bought the PG348Q 3440x1440p IPS OC at 100Hz and I still use it and going from a standard flat 24-27" to a 34" UW was a big difference in feel, looks and especially the immersive interactions in games. Now, I'm upgrading to 9800X3D, 5090 in January I hope and bought the G9 OLED and hoping for as a big experience leap as it was going from standard to UW.
Love this monitor! Personally the ppi is just a little too low for me at 45" so i went for the 39" version and it's my favorite monitor I've ever owned by far
I’ve had this monitor for several months now and it’s a beast. I prefer playing on this over my 42C2 simply because the immersion granted by the aspect ratio and curve more than outweighs the benefits of a 4K image. Playing @ 16:9 4K feels very cramped now 😂
@@stevenswall Only in HDR. So if you want good color vibrancy in HDR Id recommend a QD-OLED. However it isnt the worst on W-OLED especially if your on PC because you can manually change the color saturation however not on consoles so colors will be a lot less vibrant.
I am very tempted to get this monitor and I'm pretty sure that it will be amazing for gaming. BUT since it's only 2K resolution, it will not benefit my work needs. I hope that they will come out with a 4K version. Then I'll jump in right away.
I actually have both. I prefer playing my PC games on this over my LG 42 OLED as I personally find the ultrawide aspect ratio + 800r curve much more impactful due to the immersion it provides over just 4K resolution. As an added bonus, you actually also achieve better frames as 1440p is way easier to drive over 4K.
I have this 45" 2024 LG curved OLED and a 48" C2 (120 Hz and lower peak brightness compared to C4). I use both depending on how many frames I can push at each resolution. Neither will be regretted.
Does this have any colour fringing issues on Windows or Mac? Where the edges of text/elements only light up some of the OLED sub pixels, leading to pink/green tinges on the edges of elements? I had this issues on an Alienware OLED.
It would have been great if it had 4k res. On 39 I notice low ppi and in 45 I imagine its even worse. Also it would be insane if they had it in gloss finish also.
PPI just isn’t enough for this screen size. In 1 month the proper version of this will be announced. - 45” 21:9 curved OLED - 5120x2160 - 165hz or 240hz - New pixel layout - 1300 nits brightness ua-cam.com/video/2L_OtIQEXOk/v-deo.html
I’m sorry but you’ve got this r value bit wrong. The human eye does not have an “r value”. The r value for a monitor defines the distance that monitor needs to be placed away from you in order to achieve a constant horizontal focal distance across the display (because of the displays curvature). 800r curved monitor? Constant horizontal focal distance occurs 80cm away. 1800r curves monitor?…1.8m away. Sitting at the displays r value away, your eyes then do not have to refocus when scanning across the display. This is true for any r value display, so long as you sit at its r distance away.
Im looking forward to their 5120x2160 monitor that should be out this year. I have a feeling even the 4090 will struggle to get over 100fps though. Not the biggest deal, can just set the resolution to 3840x2160 until i can get a 5090.
@drunkhusband6257 my backlog of games is big enough by the time the 6090 comes out and can push it I'll be somewhat caught up. As an example, I still need to play thru the Witcher 2 before I can get into 3............ And I own the whole trilogy........ Damn steam bundle sales
You won't like it..I returned my 39" . Content was like having a 34" 1080p to view. I sent mine back and went with this king>Alienware 34 Curved QD-OLED Gaming Monitor - AW3423DWF. It's just flawless
@GearinSuper I already own a 34" ultra wide and don't plan on getting anything bigger until 2160p comes out. The problem is that over time the height has just shrunk on me. I don't think 1440p should be much bigger, that's why Im excited for the 2160p. I don't think I need all the real estate of the 45" but I'd have to see it in person, but yeah, over the last couple of years of owning that 34" I've gotten used to the vertical height and it does seem shorter or something. Back in the day LG made a 21:10 panel, that would be awesome, but sadly I've not seen anything on anyone's roadmap for that
I picked one of these up (39") and returned it after a few days . I just couldn't passed the 800r curve and felt, meh. Truthfully it just sucked at viewing content with low PPI in comparison to a 1080p 34". My 9 yr old 34" Benq 1080p looked better at content . So! I went with this >Alienware 34 Curved QD-OLED Gaming Monitor - AW3423DWF. This one beats the LG , period. I mean if you want that immersive feel, for a consol player this might be a good choice.
100% - I was so close to purchasing this LG, but all the reviews led me to PPI concerns. I ended up purchasing a Dell U4021QW. Seems to be the best balance for my lifestyle.
@@drunkhusband6257didn’t say a thing about brightness, it’s the discrepancy and details in the brightness and the black/ shadow. It can be blinding, still HDR compared to a standard OLED is sh*t. But hey, each to their own. I’m using the LG Flex, not the brightest but that is over a year old.
@@thanosaias2717 That's literally the model I'm featuring in the video... I tell you the model name in the video at 00:15 and also linked it in the description. It's actually impressive how you failed to realize this.
just one problem for me.. Its fucking BENT bro.. I cant take it. I never wanted it. Never asked for it and never liked it. Now its basically my only option.
This monitor currently has a MASSIVE discount of 40% off (looks like I timed this upload perfectly lol).
There are two versions of the 45" LG UltraGear OLED:
⮕ With USB-C Connectivity and Built-In Speakers (45GS96QB): geni.us/LG45GS96QB
⮕ Without USB-C Connectivity and Built-In Speakers (45GS95QE): geni.us/45GS95QE
I enjoyed this review a lot! Most reviewers appear in the video more than the actual monitor. You show more of the monitor and a good selection of various games. I also like it when you show yourself using it, 3:06, helps with scale.
The "Why Curve is important" section was excellent! I've *never* seen anyone else explain this concept better! Great review but I'll be waiting for a higher PPI version, ideally a 38" 3840x1600p OLED since 5120x2160p won't be easily drivable
ya this could have been great at 3840x1600
The hideous curve on this display is what's stopping me pulling the trigger, if it was a more sensible 1800R LG would pull the trigger.
I have it . Its the best Ultrawide for gaming period in my view. I don't need 4k gaming. Its the perfect size with at 45 inch 21;9 aspect ratio. OLED is a game changer. Im never going back.
Why everyone just blabs about never going back? Should I say when I bought 5800X3d that I never going back to ryzen 3600? Or that I will never use 1080ti in the future after I got rx6800?
@@PREDATEURLT Its in reference to OLED technology. If you use one for a gaming monitor you would get it
@@snostorm100 But nobody cares where you go back or not.
3440x1440@240Hz.
This is not the 45" OLED we have been waiting for. The 5120x2160@240Hz should come early next year.
1440p is perfect for gaming though, and this monitor is a gaming-oriented monitor after all. Even my RTX 3090 struggles to run many games at 100+ FPS in 4K.
There's also no 4K version of this monitor...and won't be until some unannounced time in 2025. It will also cost significantly more.
I'm not bashing 4K, I love 4K gaming monitors. But for now I still think this is the best Ultrawide OLED gaming monitor currently available.
@CreatedTech i disagree. I notice the picture just a touch too soft, where 4k sharpens it in all the right places
@@CreatedTech Thats your opinion but the resolution is not it. Also super misleading not having it written... anywhere and left out of your specs section.
@@CreatedTech I currently play on a LG 38" 3840x1600 LED, and I look very much forward to the 5120x2160 240hz Oled's coming next year - as I do wish for a bit more pixels, a bit more hz, and to move to OLED :) I do even on this monitor notice that it could do better with a slightly higher pixel density - but that is really all about how far from the monitor you sit :) I can easily imagine 45" 1440p quickly being a bit blurry on a regular computer desk though - as there is not enough room to move it further back if having a wall behind.
Even if I aim for higher ress myself, I think the 1440p is a good sweetspot for more users nowadays since higher ress takes too much computer power to run smooth. I currently run this monitor with a 4090 card, and expect having to use a 5090 for a 5120x2160
And price will be 3000 USD, not worth it. Great monitor for sure, but you need an absolute beast PC to even run that resolution and be able to even reach 100 fps. Very future proof monitor but it will be too expensive IMHO.
Only thing we are missing is 4k....I cant wait for this thing in 4k, it will be Endgame
That is supposed to come out in 2025. It’s going in production December 2024.
This is what I'm waiting for, I haven't felt so immersed before. I'll pay good money for this in 4k
@@JM-cl7cm i would to, but theres no way im still not waiting a few months again after its out, if the prices fall as fast as they did iwth this years model, I would bite me in the ass if I buy it for full price
just get a 32" or 42" flat - better for watching movies and stuff
4k, come on we can do better.
I thought this was optimum for a sec lol
😂 same
Temu optimum
@froozen3596 what make it not optimum I don't understand what that means?
@@jamesisaacson6379 optimum is a different content creator with a similar style as this video
thanks for this review. I complete my purchase yesterday after a really depth investigation. After wathcing your review I firmly believe that I made the right choice.
You re going to be so dissapointed. I ve returned mine, the fucking curve is too aggresive and too much pixel on the screen not suitable for internet browsing!!!😢
Don't listen to the hater who replied to your comment. You'll probably love this monitor. The curve is great and super immersive, and 1440p resolution is really not a big deal. It's not great for reading text but it's awesome for gaming.
I have this monitor and it is absolutely incredible for first person shooters. So immersive. The curve is aggressive but you get used to it quick and I love it. I will say this though, despite my love for this monitor. Starcraft 2 gameplay looks wonky. The curve really warps the field that should appear flat. Just thought I would throw that out there for the RTS fans.
Over the summer, I upgraded from an IPS LCD Asus 27" ROG monitor to the Alienware AW3225QF - a 32" QD-OLED 4K display. Going OLED was an absolutely massive upgrade, especially for gaming, and the colours and everything looks absolutely amazing! Not to mention HDR looks so much better than it did on a LCD with no local dimming zones.
This an excellent review. I owned a G9 Odyessy 49" for years and switched to this. I cannot state how much I missed the verticle pixels but didn't know it. This paired with a high end gaming rig will absolutely crush any game and provide an amazing experience of silky smooth movement with vibrant visuals. It is the sweet spot imo, performance meets visual fidelity. 50 series cards will be able to do this better at 4k, if you have a 30 or 40 series card, 1440p is the way to go if you want the best of both worlds.
Yeah the shorter vertical height of the Samsung 49" is just wayyy too restrictive IMO. I feel like the edges are wasted too. I'd rather those pixels on top than to the side.
@@CreatedTech yes, and with my 4090 I am getting 120 fps in cyberpunk with path tracing and everything on ultra. It’s an amazing experience
This video is interesting to me. I went from a 34in led 144 hz with a 27in 144 hz on the side for gaming and surfing. Just got the 49in Samsung Friday on Black Friday deal. I am super hyped about it. A little nervous about burn in as it’s my first oled. But that led me to researching more and found this comparison. I’m not opposed to returning it and getting this monitor but to be honest I’m not sure I’d like the aggressive curve on the lg.
I use it for Sim racing, it's fantastic. But the 5k/2k version will be out soon, I recommend most folks wait for that if you plan on sitting close to it. For gaming though, this 1440p version is great, less pixels to push.
3440 x 1440 on 45 inch or 3440 x 1440 on the 34 inch 🤔 I believe it would be a little more pixelated, right
You need to sit far not close so it will look better yes it will look worse than a 34 inch
It definitely is. You don't even need to sit close to notice it and no amount of anti aliasing is going to help you when gaming. You can simply not notice the less-sharp image even when you sit far enough. 1440p is good at 27" and 4k at 32" and beyond. This monitor is just not it.
@@heyramineni It's perfectly fine, the image is sharp, you're a moron.
To see some pixels, you need to be very close to the screen. And more dens pixels, lead to les fps.
LG just announced two new version of their 45" ultrawide OLED. Both of them are now 5k2k. Way better resolution than the 1440p on this model.
4:17 wait… Have you run HDR calibration on Windows and each game? Most games take this in consideration.
I bought the first Gen of UW monitor back in 2017 or if it was 2016, anyway, I bought the PG348Q 3440x1440p IPS OC at 100Hz and I still use it and going from a standard flat 24-27" to a 34" UW was a big difference in feel, looks and especially the immersive interactions in games.
Now, I'm upgrading to 9800X3D, 5090 in January I hope and bought the G9 OLED and hoping for as a big experience leap as it was going from standard to UW.
Love this monitor! Personally the ppi is just a little too low for me at 45" so i went for the 39" version and it's my favorite monitor I've ever owned by far
I've got the 2024 model and is very good. The OLED colours are amazing
I’ve had this monitor for several months now and it’s a beast. I prefer playing on this over my 42C2 simply because the immersion granted by the aspect ratio and curve more than outweighs the benefits of a 4K image. Playing @ 16:9 4K feels very cramped now 😂
Woah good channel. And also i can't go lower than 42" now after C2 lol. I think this is it.
Ooof that looks awesome ! 😅 I want one!
It’s great. The only issue I have with it is colors compared to QD-OLED, but as a content consumption monitor it is truly excellent.
Does the QDL have a wider color gamut?
@@stevenswall Only in HDR. So if you want good color vibrancy in HDR Id recommend a QD-OLED. However it isnt the worst on W-OLED especially if your on PC because you can manually change the color saturation however not on consoles so colors will be a lot less vibrant.
What are those speaker stands?? They are cool
Can you explain the best settings?
I am very tempted to get this monitor and I'm pretty sure that it will be amazing for gaming. BUT since it's only 2K resolution, it will not benefit my work needs. I hope that they will come out with a 4K version. Then I'll jump in right away.
Mathematically, its much closer to 4k than you realize. Its more than 3k resolution. This is not the same resolution as a standard 2k monitor.
With 3440x max rez, what do you think about the PPI? I have the 39" and use DSR to make up for it
Great video. I'm actually thorn between this monitor and a LG C4 42'' TV
LG C4 42'' TV this can not be better :) I have mine, and well what can i say, the best until The 5120x2160@240Hz that another op pointed up
I actually have both. I prefer playing my PC games on this over my LG 42 OLED as I personally find the ultrawide aspect ratio + 800r curve much more impactful due to the immersion it provides over just 4K resolution. As an added bonus, you actually also achieve better frames as 1440p is way easier to drive over 4K.
I have this 45" 2024 LG curved OLED and a 48" C2 (120 Hz and lower peak brightness compared to C4). I use both depending on how many frames I can push at each resolution. Neither will be regretted.
Hey, what game are you playing in the video ?
Does this have any colour fringing issues on Windows or Mac? Where the edges of text/elements only light up some of the OLED sub pixels, leading to pink/green tinges on the edges of elements? I had this issues on an Alienware OLED.
I didn’t notice any
What kind of of PC you would need to get the best out of a monitor like this?
It would have been great if it had 4k res. On 39 I notice low ppi and in 45 I imagine its even worse. Also it would be insane if they had it in gloss finish also.
I’m waiting for the 57” odyssey G9 getting the OLED treadment
this is the 45GR95QE and not the 45GS95QE, right? the base of a screen is different
No, this is the 45GS96QB.
PPI just isn’t enough for this screen size. In 1 month the proper version of this will be announced.
- 45” 21:9 curved OLED
- 5120x2160
- 165hz or 240hz
- New pixel layout
- 1300 nits brightness
ua-cam.com/video/2L_OtIQEXOk/v-deo.html
This one already has 1300 nits
@ I know, I was listing the specs of the new one.
I hope it comes out early this year and I hope it's not very expensive
We got Optimum 2.0 before GTA 6
A 45" 2160p version got leaked to release early 2025.
Let's hope it'll be the whole package.
it not will be release early, april/may 2025
@@iDexy88no it's going to release here soon
@@Thepvpguy128 same like GS model this year, its shown on ces2024 and in europe we got first batch on May/June
Just picked one up, I am hesitant because it's only 4k but 44" so the pixel density is much less than my 28" 4k but I will give it a shot
It's not 4K mate.
@ already returned it. For $1,000 I hoped for better
I just picked this bad boy up for Black Friday. I will get the 4K version when GTA VI comes to PC.
Gta Vl is already hard to run so 4k? You frames will be like 60
@JoelAngelo-x3m We will see what happens.
@@americanalpha7606 gta is 60% cpu 40% gpu hope u have like 7700x minimum
How well will it work for ps5? Screen tearing, burn ins. Thanks
You should never buy an ultrawide monitor for console as they do not support ultrawide aspect ratios.
I’m sorry but you’ve got this r value bit wrong. The human eye does not have an “r value”. The r value for a monitor defines the distance that monitor needs to be placed away from you in order to achieve a constant horizontal focal distance across the display (because of the displays curvature). 800r curved monitor? Constant horizontal focal distance occurs 80cm away. 1800r curves monitor?…1.8m away. Sitting at the displays r value away, your eyes then do not have to refocus when scanning across the display. This is true for any r value display, so long as you sit at its r distance away.
they have a 39" version of this display too same stats
Im looking forward to their 5120x2160 monitor that should be out this year. I have a feeling even the 4090 will struggle to get over 100fps though. Not the biggest deal, can just set the resolution to 3840x2160 until i can get a 5090.
I disagree. PPI is way too low. The 39" is better, but the 2160p version on LGs roadmap is going to be nice. I can't wait for the 39" version of that
Have fun trying to run games at 5120x2160 unless you play nothing but old titles or e-sports titles you're screwed.
@drunkhusband6257 my backlog of games is big enough by the time the 6090 comes out and can push it I'll be somewhat caught up. As an example, I still need to play thru the Witcher 2 before I can get into 3............ And I own the whole trilogy........ Damn steam bundle sales
You won't like it..I returned my 39" . Content was like having a 34" 1080p to view. I sent mine back and went with this king>Alienware 34 Curved QD-OLED Gaming Monitor - AW3423DWF. It's just flawless
@GearinSuper I already own a 34" ultra wide and don't plan on getting anything bigger until 2160p comes out. The problem is that over time the height has just shrunk on me. I don't think 1440p should be much bigger, that's why Im excited for the 2160p. I don't think I need all the real estate of the 45" but I'd have to see it in person, but yeah, over the last couple of years of owning that 34" I've gotten used to the vertical height and it does seem shorter or something. Back in the day LG made a 21:10 panel, that would be awesome, but sadly I've not seen anything on anyone's roadmap for that
@@jonathonschott Once you go 45" ultrawide it's hard to go back to smaller.
Would rather have a 4k 120/144 but that 240+seems really important currently 🤷♂️
If they would replicate the alienware 38 led 1600p in oled id buy it tomorrow i think 1440p is too low for a panel that size
Nobody:
Me waiting for OLED with QLED brightness 8K 540hz ultrawide shiny display...
the 5120x2160 one is coming in 2025 45''
I got a LG UltraGear 32in OLED dual mode 4k240/HD480hz monitor for cheaper and I love it
In the specs section of the video you never once mention the resolution of the display. I assume it’s 1440p, but still a missed mark.
I cover the resolution of the monitor later on… keep watching.
That low ppi though!
I picked one of these up (39") and returned it after a few days . I just couldn't passed the 800r curve and felt, meh. Truthfully it just sucked at viewing content with low PPI in comparison to a 1080p 34". My 9 yr old 34" Benq 1080p looked better at content .
So! I went with this >Alienware 34 Curved QD-OLED Gaming Monitor - AW3423DWF. This one beats the LG , period. I mean if you want that immersive feel, for a consol player this might be a good choice.
Perfect monitor for 10+ years of playing games in 100+ fps
The pixel density is honestly a deal breaker for me
100% - I was so close to purchasing this LG, but all the reviews led me to PPI concerns. I ended up purchasing a Dell U4021QW. Seems to be the best balance for my lifestyle.
95 model would be my choice easily, extra brightness you get with 96 is basically useless as it's already too bright, and it cost 1000$ more.
Do yourself a favor. Get a 32" 4k 240Hz QD-OLED like the Dell Alienware AW3225QF and enjoy immersive, vertical space, Glossy and high PPI.
Well, still no 8k monitors for enthusiasts (except professional models)…
Perfection? Ahh, I'd day perfection is 3440×1440 or better yet 5120×2160 on a 29 inches with 240Hz minimum plus an insanely bright HDR.
If only it was 4k in height 😢
Great❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
ill stick with my lg c2 42"
1440p at 45 inches can't be very sharp though. I'm used to 4K at 32 inches, so that wouldn't be possible for me.
O beleave me, its very scharp, amd les dens of pixels works more positive for fps performance.
We all have different tastes, but gotta be honest, I would never call a 45" 1440P oled "perfect." That pixel density is atrocious.
jesus that FOV is set WAY to high man, that fisheye effect is horrible
You keep saying "LED" monitors, yet this *is* an LED monitor. You mean LCD which is completely different.
My current lg ultrawide is 3840x1600 at 38 inches. This will be a downgrade to me in terms of resolution.
Yes.
Great competitor for the G9
1440p in 2024.. better to wait for 2025 for oleds
Did u copy him or did he copy u
4K in 2025
too much curve. that is the only downside. technically one can argue that this much curve is ok but this much curve on a monitor is not suitable IMHO
Once it's in front of you you don't even notice the curve
You don’t understand perspective
Have you actually used this monitor at your setup for any length of time? Don't knock it until you've tried it.
This monitor is so dope you know its awesome when your girl hates it
I sold my girl to buy this monitor - problem solved!
The perfect OLED ? One wihout risk of burn-in.
Oh, well ... 🤷♂️🤷♀️🤷
Rather prefer 4k 120hz.. 😢
Cat 🐈 🤍🤍🤍
I bought this monitor for her to watch fish videos on.
No point of buying this one when the new one is about to drop.
oled with anti glare / matte finish....stupidest thing ive heard for a good while lmao
Needs to be 5k:2k worthless otherwise
Misleading puffpiece. 3440x1440 on a 45 inch what a joke
HDR 400.... on a OLED.... f'**king shame...
The LG 45 Oled is currently the brightest oled monitor you can buy....
@@drunkhusband6257didn’t say a thing about brightness, it’s the discrepancy and details in the brightness and the black/ shadow. It can be blinding, still HDR compared to a standard OLED is sh*t. But hey, each to their own. I’m using the LG Flex, not the brightest but that is over a year old.
1440p on 45 inches? yea no thx
Straight up copy of "optimum" WTF xD gotta do atleast one original think yourself :)
I don’t even have to watch. Already seen it irl. Too curved.
82 pixels per inch... eww
Here come the ppi police 😂 its a gaming monitor not for you spreadsheet warriors
Dislike.
This is not perfect monitor, I have one.
Perfect, for 2025 will be 5K2K 240Hz
Low ppi. Only for gaming
The reason why they call it a gaming monitor!!!
There's a newer model for christ sake...
And that model is…?
lg45gs96qb
@@thanosaias2717 That's literally the model I'm featuring in the video... I tell you the model name in the video at 00:15 and also linked it in the description. It's actually impressive how you failed to realize this.
True, didn't notice
just one problem for me.. Its fucking BENT bro.. I cant take it. I never wanted it. Never asked for it and never liked it. Now its basically my only option.
4k all the way pixels are to big in 2k