So cool! This is "exactly" the EX30 I'll be getting in 2 weeks. Same colour, same trim, same drive train, same wheels, same everything. Only difference is mine is MY25. Cool to see!! Merci! Actually I think yours must be MY25 as well, because that trim combination doesn't exist for MY24 (as far as I know)
@@HelmutBemboka not sure about Australia, but that's what I have her in France Even have the aftermarket window tinting done by the dealership since that would have made me loose the incentive. Interior trim and that combination was the 1st my dealership had seen and they quite liked it. So far it's holding up well with the kids at the back (6 & 8)
The range in my EX30 is based on my past consumption, but several people have commented on Facebook that you can change it between the WLTP and real range. I haven't found that setting, but clearly the cars you are testing is set to revert to WLTP
@@SWR112 I am getting around 380km based on where I live. If I lived the same distance from the office, but 180 degrees opposite end, I would get around 450km
Hello, the average speed was 112 km/h against 127km/h, i think there's a significative difference in speed and as well in consumption between those two cars. Thanks you very much for your videos and stats. I like your contents, even if i'm not fluent in English. Thanks. 😀
Yes and no, it also meant more acceleration / deceleration … so yes same average speed would be better, but it is not that much of a difference in the end if you really try to get back to 130 … you loose efficiency in doing so …
I hoped for more than 284km. But the 0.28 drag coefficient is among the worst of modern EVs, so it’s not surprising that highway range isn’t great. Tesla Model Y and Skoda Enyaq have drag coefficient of 0.23 and ID.3 is 0.26 (same for forthcoming Skoda’s small EV crossover). Volvo needs to step up with aero. 0.28 was great for ICE cars a few years ago, but today it’s losing to all other new EVs.
My Tesla model 3 RWD (58 kWh) set to 140 km/h autopilot in summer does 330 km (roughly 18 kWh/100km consumption) And it's a bit bigger and a bit faster car. (283 HP) So idd, it's disappointing.
With the dual motor you had a much lower avg speed. Nothing confusing about that.
Exactly, dual motor test does not even qualify as 120km/h. Completely different run.
Just found a reference to the range indicator settings. Dynamic to Certified Range can be changed in Settings -> System -> Units
you have to choose dynamic to have the range based on driving
Can you have the possibility to test the LFP version? A comparison could be interesting!
So cool! This is "exactly" the EX30 I'll be getting in 2 weeks. Same colour, same trim, same drive train, same wheels, same everything. Only difference is mine is MY25. Cool to see!! Merci! Actually I think yours must be MY25 as well, because that trim combination doesn't exist for MY24 (as far as I know)
That's exactly my MY'24 Plus trim
Just need to confirm the HK audio and towing kit🤭
@@Nitsugua80 Actually I don't think that color/trim combination is available for MY24. At least not in Australia....
@@HelmutBemboka not sure about Australia, but that's what I have her in France
Even have the aftermarket window tinting done by the dealership since that would have made me loose the incentive.
Interior trim and that combination was the 1st my dealership had seen and they quite liked it.
So far it's holding up well with the kids at the back (6 & 8)
@@Nitsugua80 Yeah I think the pine interior with vapour grey looks fantastic!
The range in my EX30 is based on my past consumption, but several people have commented on Facebook that you can change it between the WLTP and real range. I haven't found that setting, but clearly the cars you are testing is set to revert to WLTP
Yes, you need to dig into the charging menu I believe
Mine is set to real range and is quite good
So wha are you getting real world?
@@SWR112 I am getting around 380km based on where I live. If I lived the same distance from the office, but 180 degrees opposite end, I would get around 450km
Hello, the average speed was 112 km/h against 127km/h, i think there's a significative difference in speed and as well in consumption between those two cars. Thanks you very much for your videos and stats. I like your contents, even if i'm not fluent in English. Thanks. 😀
Yes and no, it also meant more acceleration / deceleration … so yes same average speed would be better, but it is not that much of a difference in the end if you really try to get back to 130 … you loose efficiency in doing so …
Also wanted to ask, I assume you used one pedal drive for all these tests?
Which update?
I hoped for more than 284km. But the 0.28 drag coefficient is among the worst of modern EVs, so it’s not surprising that highway range isn’t great. Tesla Model Y and Skoda Enyaq have drag coefficient of 0.23 and ID.3 is 0.26 (same for forthcoming Skoda’s small EV crossover). Volvo needs to step up with aero. 0.28 was great for ICE cars a few years ago, but today it’s losing to all other new EVs.
My Tesla model 3 RWD (58 kWh) set to 140 km/h autopilot in summer does 330 km (roughly 18 kWh/100km consumption) And it's a bit bigger and a bit faster car. (283 HP)
So idd, it's disappointing.
Why are you complaining about having to steer yourself? Would you seriously trust a car doing 130kmh to steer for you?
Maybe Tesla is not as much premium electricity as Ionity and has less energy per kWh 😂
Buy a gas car and you will be out of this problem with range .