VW Id.3 Battle - GTX versus ProS

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 25 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 16

  • @michaelgoode9555
    @michaelgoode9555 29 днів тому +11

    You keep saying ID.7. They're all ID.3's from where I am looking.

  • @martin5697
    @martin5697 25 днів тому +2

    Thanks for reviewing an 2021 ID3 Pro S. I am looking for the 77 instead of the 58kWh model cause of the charging speed and to use as a PV buffer. (Is V2G/V2L enabled in the oldest model also, maybe a cheaper wallbox will sometimes be available)

  • @srensrensen3112
    @srensrensen3112 28 днів тому

    What a great video Chris 👍👍👍👍 say hi to the other guys to, i like this kind of comparing between cars 😊
    Thanks Chris

  • @bq5577x
    @bq5577x 29 днів тому +1

    Great test! I want to buy the "old Pro S ID.3", will the battery preheating come in the new software for the 2021 2011 Pro S? Would be nice. Since I know the hardware is there in the battery.. Would be amazing for longer road trips!

  • @Air-ic279
    @Air-ic279 29 днів тому +2

    You compared the wheel sizes but did not point out what kind of tires are on each car. I know the gtx has summer tires on but what about the others? As we are in the middle of October a lot of drivers already changed to winter or all season tires which is a big difference in consumption.
    I would also appreciate to mention the tire brands and model.
    To make it really nerdy the tire pressure is also a factor.
    Right now I just feel that you do not pay enough attention to the different tire efficiencies.
    Maybe you can add these informations?
    Thanks for the video.

    • @HanYou2
      @HanYou2 29 днів тому

      I ran all summer with my winter tires and I didn't see any difference in consumption from last summer. Maybe the original summer tires on my kona are just bad.

  • @arnaudburliga8190
    @arnaudburliga8190 28 днів тому

    Hello. I received my gtx performance in February. I'm wondering if I can change the size of the wheels. Could you take a picture at the label for wheels and pressure in the door. If there is no 19 inch wheels. It means that this car is not approved for other wheels. In that case I will go for silencier pneumatic. Thank you. I love your work and your informations.

  • @subbiahpalani
    @subbiahpalani 28 днів тому

    Does I’d vehicles have a non linear energy meter, that would skew results

  • @christianbettoni81
    @christianbettoni81 8 днів тому

    GTX 🤘🏻😁

  • @cptbill80
    @cptbill80 29 днів тому

    I am confused. Are you comparing id7 or id3s? :p

  • @Foersom_
    @Foersom_ 26 днів тому

    @BatteryLife 18:26 "arrived with 42% ... 38%" both are too high for fast charging. Arrive with =25 C for fast charging, >=30 C for max charging.

  • @verygoodbrother
    @verygoodbrother 29 днів тому +1

    There might be slipstream effect going.

    • @iaintdonknow
      @iaintdonknow 29 днів тому +1

      He usually changes around the order

    • @bq5577x
      @bq5577x 29 днів тому

      With this distance that would be very, very minor. I know that since fuel efficient driving (With my fossil monster) has always been a theme for me. I'd like to buy the ID.3 Pro S soon (ID.3 GTX I sadly can't afford, I like it the most)

  • @glockmanish
    @glockmanish 21 день тому

    There is it again "Heatpump doesn't make much difference". Stop claiming such false information!
    The normal use case is NOT climbing in your pre-heated car so the heating just has to hold the temperature and burn down the Autobahn, where you have a constant load of 22.5kW (112km/h average speed and around 20kWh/100km means 22.5kW of average power) , so some 1kW of difference between heat-pump and PTC will only mean around 3.5% of difference in comsumption.
    The ACTUAL normal use case is climbing in your cold car at least 2 times a day so the heating has to heat up the car and doing your commute at around 45km/h average speed. Just for moving the car I assume the ID.3 can achieve 14kWh/100km at such speeds in winter, which means an average power is 6.3kW. Heatpump on full blast takes 2kW, PTC heater around 6kW. Both will run on full power for around 15min on a cold day and cold car. So the PTC will DOUBLE the comsumption during that heat-up-phase, while the heat-pump will only add 1/3.
    So for people with 15 to 20 minute commutes there is an energy saving of 33% to be had in cold winter conditions when choosing heat-pump! This is admittedly an extreme scenario but this is the other end of the use case spectrum that TOTALLY invalidates the "Heatpump doesn't make much difference" non-sense. This was bullshit that was told when Tesla didn't have heat-pump ... Now it is the crazy shit they love to brag about and the efficiency it creates!