Real vs Rip Off Woodpeckers Tools | The Results May Shock You!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 430

  • @731Woodworks
    @731Woodworks  Рік тому +3

    ▼EXPAND FOR TOOL LINKS and INFO▼
    Watch Next = 5 Tools You've Never Seen Before ua-cam.com/video/S1Ui1A2m7ac/v-deo.html
    Woodpeckers Paolini Pocket Rule Set - amzn.to/43xHgw7
    Fake Pocket Rule Set - amzn.to/3IIZgLL
    Fake Pocket Rule (blue color) - amzn.to/3MXrJjE
    Woodpeckers T-Square - amzn.to/42br56g
    Fake T-Square - amzn.to/3qi0mYw
    Woodpeckers Saddle T Square - amzn.to/3C02CXe
    Fake Saddle T-Square - amzn.to/3qdIBd4
    Woodpeckers Tiny Square - amzn.to/3MZxAVr
    Fake Tiny Square - amzn.to/3BZIYug
    Fake Tiny Square Option 2 - amzn.to/3IMkl8k
    Woodpeckers Small Carpenters Square (Delve Square) - amzn.to/3otIPfI
    Fake Small Carpenter Square - amzn.to/437gfj6
    DFM Small Carpenter Square - amzn.to/3MZ0SDH
    Pencil I Use - amzn.to/3OFaeFV
    TrueWerk Work Clothes - truewerk.pxf.io/GmbJjE Use code WOODWORKS10 to save 10% off your order for a LIMITED TIME ONLY.
    The full list of tools and supplies I recommend can be found on my website: www.731woodworks.com/recommended-tools
    Join the TUBAFOUR NATION through Patreon to get access to exclusive member only behind the scenes videos, member only livestreams, exclusive discounts, and other cool member only perks! www.patreon.com/731woodworks
    Check this video's description for links to all the videos I discussed.
    If you use one of these Amazon and other affiliate links, I may receive a commission
    Some other useful links:
    Daily Tool Deals on my website: www.731woodworks.com/tool-deals
    Subscribe to our email Newsletter to get new content alerts, sales, and more! mailchi.mp/7e44c16eefdc/731-woodworks-email-newsletter
    Check out my easy-to-follow woodworking plans: www.731woodworks.com/store
    Outlaw's Board Butter - So Good it Should be Outlawed: www.731woodworks.com/store/boardbutter

    • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n Рік тому +1

      The return policy on Amazon is fantastic. If you don't like something for any reason, they will send you a shipping label and refund your money that day or send you a new one. If something is defective you will find it immediately, not years from now. It's sad to see you so loyally compare products with no objectivity or common sense.

    • @ruthiecabine2501
      @ruthiecabine2501 Рік тому

      This is a great item

    • @mariuszjarczak3679
      @mariuszjarczak3679 Рік тому

      @@BariumCobaltNitrog3n That's why when you pay $50 on Amazon it is really worth $35 because of that returns policy.

    • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n Рік тому

      @@mariuszjarczak3679 You have to choose wisely, read reviews-more is better, look at the company's rank and rep score

  • @geoffdrew5207
    @geoffdrew5207 Рік тому +8

    Excellent comparison. One point I would make regarding the Woodpeckers lifetime warranty is that it wouldn't cover neglect and with these tools only neglect would make them faulty.

  • @jackfeldmann44
    @jackfeldmann44 Рік тому +8

    I have experienced Woodpeckers warranty first hand. Far and above my expectations. Great people there.

    • @philipkern6774
      @philipkern6774 Рік тому +5

      Hi Jack, I’m interested in what the warranty claim was about. Did it fail over time or out of the box? While their warranty service may be great, if something goes wrong with the Amazon version of the pocket rules, I can replace them 5 times over and still be ahead money wise compared to the Woodpeckers brand. Thanks.

    • @Bob-o-h4k
      @Bob-o-h4k 3 місяці тому

      Or you can return it to and the will probablylet you have that one for free and give you another one

  • @chrisstennett1592
    @chrisstennett1592 Рік тому +4

    This is amazing! I have the Woodpeckers 12” edge rule and really wanted a 24” T square but the cost was unreasonable compared to the edge rule. I was too scared to buy the knock off bc I wanted consistent measurements. You just save me so much money!

  • @Joey.Darkwoods-Studio
    @Joey.Darkwoods-Studio Рік тому

    Hell, for someone starting off and getting new tools, this helps a lot. Worth the buy...

  • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
    @BariumCobaltNitrog3n Рік тому +6

    13:00 That hole is not "self-centering" it's just a hole.
    You have proven beyond a doubt that American made means overpriced. Made in China does not mean lower quality. iPhone, Rolex, Cartier, Omega, Mercedes Benz, BMW and hundreds of American brands are made in China.

    • @731Woodworks
      @731Woodworks  Рік тому

      What I meant was that the hole is in the center of 3/4" stock and if you use a self centering drill bit, it will drill the hole in the center.

    • @GolemGolem-h4m
      @GolemGolem-h4m 7 місяців тому +1

      They're made in China because Chinese manufacturers do not pay a living wage and the government provides significant subsidies and trade protections to its industries. If the US were to levy a tax on foreign goods based on wage comparability, the price differences would disappear.

    • @BariumCobaltNitrog3n
      @BariumCobaltNitrog3n 7 місяців тому +2

      @@GolemGolem-h4m IF my mother had balls she'd be my dad.

    • @elmouto3883
      @elmouto3883 4 місяці тому +1

      Please tell me how an underpaid, underage Chinese kid manage to make highly precise tools in bulk.

  • @lennyrosen7033
    @lennyrosen7033 Рік тому +1

    I have wanted a set of Poalini Pocket Rules for a long time but couldn’t justify the price. I’m just a amateur woodcrafter. I don’t make my living doing woodworking. Thanks for the comparison review. That knock off is affordable and good enough for me. I wanted a rack to mount them on the wall over my workbench. I made a rack out of scrap wood.

  • @markkempton4579
    @markkempton4579 Рік тому

    Thanks for this! The saddle T is the one I was really hoping would be a good value replacement, but you clearly get what you pay for.

  • @Munkendrunky
    @Munkendrunky Рік тому +52

    MATT! I appreciate all your content but I especially like this video and would love to see more content comparing/contrasting top tier hand tools against the generic stuff from Amazon. Hope you have a great Memorial Day weekend!

  • @midwestindy-15
    @midwestindy-15 Рік тому

    Which tool was the one that can quickly mark center down a board?

  • @sciroccoR
    @sciroccoR Рік тому +2

    it's very interesting. but, you've used the Woodpecker stuff as reference. how about using something like starret or optical stuff.?? what makes Woodpecker the standard??

  • @ScottS360
    @ScottS360 Рік тому +37

    You've got to give credit to Woodpeckers: they've managed to convince an entire generation of woodworkers to pay through the nose for tools delivering accuracy a machinist would envy. The Emperor's New Clothes of the woodworking world! 🤣

    • @731Woodworks
      @731Woodworks  Рік тому +2

      lol love the Emperor's New Clothes analogy!

    • @cpthornman
      @cpthornman Рік тому +1

      I call it the Apple effect.

    • @jdf585-p2g
      @jdf585-p2g Рік тому +3

      Studies have shown that people equate high price with a better product, even if the products are exactly the same.

    • @CarlYota
      @CarlYota Рік тому +2

      Anything less than an eighth of an inch is unmeasurable. Kidding aside, modern woodworkers be getting pretty crazy with their tolerances. It’s not titanium. Your furniture isn’t going to stay where you put it. You don’t need to be thinking in 64ths. It just doesn’t matter that much.

    • @MrSir2552
      @MrSir2552 Рік тому +2

      @@CarlYota I think that's going to be where I struggle most when I start making stuff, honestly. I work in a machine shop and have for over a year, so I measure things in thousandths of an inch every single day. Typically down to a 3 or 4 thousandth tolerance... Or about the width of two hairs lol. So when I get to actual woodworking, that's what I'm going to naturally want to measure to and have to remind myself it ain't that deep lol

  • @jto7642
    @jto7642 Рік тому

    Thank you! This was a truly helpful and honest video. Question though... is the knock-off saddle square's shorter overhang made 1/2" or 3/8" ("by design" like the offset on the cabinet square), or is it just random?

  • @usablellc6735
    @usablellc6735 Рік тому +4

    There is no universe within which I would spend $159 for a set of pocket rulers that I would buy for $28. Woodpeckers is quite simply out of it's mind with regard to pricing. Likewise the T-Square. Spend your money on wood, not 1/128th of an inch difference in measurement. It's woodworking, not neurosurgery.

  • @breslaj4
    @breslaj4 Рік тому +1

    I have that exact slide rule set. Works perfect for my needs.

  • @David_Avidmind
    @David_Avidmind Рік тому +5

    I do have the Amazon Chinese rules. I think the major difference between them is that the graduation markings are a surface coat/transfer, whereas according to the woodpeckers site, their markings are laser etched.

    • @robertknowles3677
      @robertknowles3677 Рік тому +2

      I watched a video with the Amazon version and it was stated that the markings are laser etched.

    • @andre1987eph
      @andre1987eph Рік тому

      ​@@robertknowles3677they are Lazer etched. I just got mine from Amazon

  • @4321Woodworking
    @4321Woodworking Рік тому +2

    Doesn't the DFM come with 2 pins so can use it as a center finding/marking as well or am I thinking the DFM small square? I got a DFM blemish set for a great price so that's an option to save a few coins as well.

    • @731Woodworks
      @731Woodworks  Рік тому +1

      I think the carpenter square comes with 1 but the mini DFM comes with 2.

  • @vampirejesus8170
    @vampirejesus8170 Рік тому +118

    I just can't justify paying the woodpeckers prices for a piece of aluminum. Are woodpeckers tools good? Yes. Are they way too expensive? Also yes. Same thing with Festool. Cant justify those prices for a plastic tool in a plastic box.

    • @stephenpalazzi720
      @stephenpalazzi720 Рік тому +14

      Purchase some of each of this brand's products use them for a year and then tell me the price isn't justifiable. I'm by no means wealthy but I've bought the Rotex 125($659 I believe) and the Festool finish sander ($229)
      And three different woodpeckers products (delve square , stainless steel combination square set, 12" T-square) but I can attest they are DEFINITELY worth the money. The Rotex obliterates the sanding time of the my Dewalt sander and time is money ESPECIALLY where woodworking is concerned. And the accuracy required for fine woodworking is something woodpecker GUARANTEES and to me both of those are important. Not saying you're wrong for feeling like you do I'm just saying that after a year of use of these you wouldn't be able to truthfully claim that. I say all this respectfully.

    • @shill71
      @shill71 Рік тому +2

      They sell steel ones, which is what I bought. Even more expensive. But they are a joy to use!

    • @daytradingnl4734
      @daytradingnl4734 Рік тому +6

      For me, festool saves time. Most times 10-30%. So it pays itself back. Everyone its own.

    • @stephenpalazzi720
      @stephenpalazzi720 Рік тому

      @@vampirejesus8170 I agree about the one time tool aspect I am not a big fan of that, also I guess I'm just not advanced enough yet to the point I can make do with whatever I have to work with I'll get there eventually I have pretty good
      Mentors to talk to when I encounter an issue that is beyond my comprehension

    • @vampirejesus8170
      @vampirejesus8170 Рік тому +1

      @@stephenpalazzi720 I hear you there. It is good to have people you can bounce questions off of..

  • @HeliRy
    @HeliRy Рік тому +7

    Banggood has quite a few quality WP knockoffs.

  • @w9jim
    @w9jim Рік тому +20

    I'm not sure if "fake" is the right word here. It's more of a "knockoff."

  • @johnleonard5857
    @johnleonard5857 Рік тому +1

    I have a few woodpecker tools. One of the, is the Saddle T-6 and I wish that the square edge was a little shorter than 3/4”. When scribing on 3/4” plywood (which is really 23/32”) I have to lift the board up so I can slide the saddle left/right when scribing. Very annoying.

  • @tchevrier
    @tchevrier Рік тому +16

    the irony is that if you really want precision then you aren't using rulers and pencils.

    • @liquidrockaquatics3900
      @liquidrockaquatics3900 Рік тому +2

      That was my thought. I am getting the slide rules though to lock down measurements and save them for later

    • @T0tenkampf
      @T0tenkampf Рік тому

      not that ironic, they are woodworking tools and considering that wood moves to some degree it doesn't matter if you use a more accurate method

    • @tchevrier
      @tchevrier Рік тому

      @@T0tenkampf as a matter of fact it does matter a considerable amount. For example if you are making hand carved dove tail joints, or mortice and tenon joints. You aren't going to be getting the precision you need with a ruler and pencil.

    • @vladimirlopez7840
      @vladimirlopez7840 Рік тому

      @@tchevrierthat’s what I use veritas marking gauges for.

    • @denniscotey8182
      @denniscotey8182 10 місяців тому

      ​@@tchevrierIve seen 100 year dovetails that might make you walk that back a bit.

  • @rswearing
    @rswearing Рік тому +1

    I'm not sure I understand what the pocket rule does that a combination or double square does not.

  • @_SYDNA_
    @_SYDNA_ Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the detailed review. Had not seen these; will probably buy a few of them. One thing I would have liked to see is testing the durability of the metal.
    Like many of us, my "shop" is my garage and often times that may actually mean the driveway in front of the garage, with smallish tables or horses. I love some of the things I can do with a speed square, but the soft aluminum in the budget square I found in the big box store dents and burs up like crazy when you drop it. Which means everytime it drops i have to get out my file and try to knock off the burs without affecting accuracy. I work hard to protect these things but it happens. The difference in sent-to-china stuff is sometimes the lack of environmental regulations and cheaper labor, but sometimes its the unseen things like metalurgy.
    It would be nice to see a "drop test" or hardness test (or maybe just poke each of them with a sharp object) to compare these two and see if the American made Woodpecker stuff is tougher in daily use.
    Follow up: So 731 gave me a "like" on the original version of this comment which probably motivated me to do more (honey vs vinegar, etc.). It turns out "Vickers" hardness is a good measure for dents in metals and dent resistance in aluminum is highly variable by alloy. In fact it varies by a factor of 15x ! Here's a link:
    Overview of materials for Aluminum Alloy
    www.matweb.com/search/DataSheet.aspx?MatGUID=ab8aeb2d293041c4a844e397b5cfbd4e
    BTW: The type of alloy doesnt seem to have much affect on thermal expansion.
    To me it would be worth it to get tougher stuff, but tougher stuff is harder to drill so it will, of course, cost more. I wonder if the Woodpecker tools are made of tougher stuff? I think I may actually get that WP t-square, which is definitely a step up from drawing lines with my framing square. I'll see if I can test the WP dentability with a nail or something in some obscure location. Thanks again for the review.

  • @skigh7190
    @skigh7190 Рік тому +9

    I really like Adam Savage's advice about buying new tools. He says to buy the cheapest version of a new tool you can find. If you end up using that tool to the point of breaking it, buy a better quality version. You could also add, if you're missing a feature that a more expensive version of the tool has, then you know it'll be worth it to you to pay the higher price.
    Great video Matt! Really enjoyed it.

    • @TheHeadincharge
      @TheHeadincharge Рік тому +1

      I think this is good advice for hand tools, but not for power tools. If you know you’re going to use something, going too cheap can result in diminished quality and create an inaccurate perspective.

    • @tchevrier
      @tchevrier Рік тому +1

      There is definitely some validity to that statement but I'll give you an example where it doesn't apply. I've had a cheap hand plane for many years. It was always a pain in the a$$ to use and never really worked properly. Recently I decided to buy a top of the line hand plane. Wow!!! what a difference. Same thing with a set of chisels. But I suppose a big part is also knowing how to properly use the tool as well.

  • @r.mercado9737
    @r.mercado9737 Рік тому

    Great presentation! Also, outstanding Tee shirt! Semper Fi

  • @mlcardwell1
    @mlcardwell1 Рік тому +16

    I am a Woodpecker fan for sure. You get what you pay for and part of that price is R&D. You can always find a Chinese knockoff of anything that is stolen and made cheaper. Customer service is a very big part of a company for me. I had a Woodpecker router bit that broke during my first use. I called customer service, they said let me look into it and get back to you. Within an hour, the President of Woodpeckers called me. He personally apologized and overnighted me not 1 but 2 new router bits. Not to mention Made in the USA!! I am happy to support a company like that.

    • @TheDaniel85
      @TheDaniel85 Рік тому +2

      Woodpeckers are a bunch of crooks that steal themselves anyways. So don't feel bad about buying the knockoffs, actually.. please buy them.

  • @robertknowles3677
    @robertknowles3677 Рік тому

    What can you do with the Paolini rules that you cannot do with the T Square other than stand it up on end?

    • @731Woodworks
      @731Woodworks  Рік тому

      put it in your pocket

    • @robertknowles3677
      @robertknowles3677 Рік тому

      @@731Woodworks I will be more specific in my question. T Square fits in a pocket as well depending on the length. Until you get to maybe 12 inches I wouldn't think that you would typically walk around with a twelve inch Paolini or T Square in your pocket but you could hang both of them from a tool belt. Once the Paolini or T Square is out of a pocket or not hanging on your tool belt, what can the Paolini do that you cannot do with the T Square again besides stand up the T Square? Trying to understand the value of having the Paolini if it seems you can do the same with a T square.

    • @731Woodworks
      @731Woodworks  Рік тому +1

      @@robertknowles3677 I think the Paolini Pocket Rule is more suited for smaller stock/work. The T Square is better on bigger stock / sheet goods, etc. It's much easier to scribe parallel lines with the t-square vs the pocket rule. But the pocket rule has the sliding stop so you can use that to repeat measurements, depths, etc. like setting the placement of door knobs, etc. Or marking the placement of say the apron on a table from the bottom of the legs.

  • @gregcooper9071
    @gregcooper9071 9 місяців тому

    Truewerk is awesome. I have t2 t3 and t4. The s4 jacket is crazy warm, has to be 32 degrees or colder to wear.

  • @Whisper2k13
    @Whisper2k13 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for explaining what that square cutout is for! 🤣

  • @Tensquaremetreworkshop
    @Tensquaremetreworkshop Рік тому +2

    Your 0.155" is pretty much 4mm, so it can be used for that. In fact, more people can use it, as more people use metric.

  • @norm5785
    @norm5785 Рік тому +2

    I purchased the pocket rule set after seeing a video about them, in black last year. For checking the depth/width settings. Checked it against the only real square I have (Starrett) and they were all dead on. Thank you for sharing your review of the fakes. Well done. Everyone stay warm, safe, happy and healthy. From Henrico County Virginia

  • @OrganicGreens
    @OrganicGreens Рік тому +2

    Your a wood worker but it bothers you to put in 4 screws for a T square?

  • @simonpetermurrell
    @simonpetermurrell Рік тому

    Great review!

  • @garethbarnes2628
    @garethbarnes2628 Рік тому

    Interested in seeing what the alloy quality would be on these

  • @brooklyn71484
    @brooklyn71484 Рік тому +7

    I have no issue paying for quality, especially if the warranty is top notch.

  • @tebald
    @tebald 9 місяців тому

    Thoughts on 3d printed tools, example corner clamps, speed square or multitools - they obviously do not compare to quality, although considering the price, for simple uses it could be a great savings for someone starting off?

  • @ponyboyc
    @ponyboyc Рік тому +4

    Machining in every country is the same its all done by cnc machines. The made in the USA price tag is crazy on these items

    • @ponyboyc
      @ponyboyc Рік тому

      @@1pcfred they used to be done like that now its all done with cnc and lazers

  • @ftnirish74
    @ftnirish74 Рік тому +2

    Hands down, one of your best comparison posts.

  • @oscar33212
    @oscar33212 Рік тому +1

    Your accuracy comparisons assumed the woodpecker’s measurements were correct. I bought sets of the pocket rules a few years back as Christmas presents and found them acceptable, but not necessarily accurate, being about a line width different.

  • @RockyRiverHills
    @RockyRiverHills Рік тому

    Appreciate the honesty of this video. Especially since you readily admit you are a Woodpeckers fan. Most folks wouldn't admit that something cheaper would rival the expensive stuff.
    Thanks for that!

  • @SandyMasquith
    @SandyMasquith Рік тому +9

    I think there are products that justify the costs for Woodpeckers. There are those times, like on the saddle square, that the features define the product. For me, it’s a matter of accuracy and convenience. I have limited pockets. I need to make sure whatever is in those pockets is accurate and can do what I need. Weirdly, the Amazon small square delivers some features the Woodpeckers doesn’t. I feel like the combination of Delve square and the Amazon small square might be justified. Or the DMT and the Woodpeckers…*sigh*. I’d much prefer to purchase USA made. Some of the cost of Woodpeckers is to enable the factory workers to make a living wage. I get it. And I am all for that! Woodpeckers folks make great products with high precision. Then they go out to dinner in their local neighborhood and add to the economy. I think that is something I can pay a little extra for.

  • @hillbilly_patriot
    @hillbilly_patriot Рік тому +1

    That's wild seeing the Paolini pocket rule on YT. I work for Paolini

  • @ehinostroza
    @ehinostroza 11 місяців тому

    If you go with the premise that woodworking IS NOT an extact science since the wood (as the rest of the materials) contracts and expands but the difference is that it doesn't do it evenly, what is an exact measure? Does it justify the extra cost?

  • @kevingeaney7741
    @kevingeaney7741 Рік тому +2

    When manufacturers put metric and inch measurements on both faces of a rule they don't do it in the optimum way. If the inches are on the edge nearest to you on one face, they do the same on the other face. It would be more useful if the inches were nearest on one face and metric was nearest to you when you flip it over. I think it would be even better if one face was all inches, (both edges), and flip it over to get all metric! Deluxe would would read L to R on the edge nearest you and R to L on the far edge. What do you think? Good video, thanks.

  • @chuckhansen5325
    @chuckhansen5325 10 місяців тому

    And just what did you use to make sure the woodpecker brand is dead on correct. I not asking to conflict or anything, just wondering. The woodpecker may be off ever so slightly but which one that is off is not off to mess up any wood working anyone does.

  • @KimWarwick-th4vd
    @KimWarwick-th4vd Рік тому

    Woodpeckers not available in the Uk

  • @donbrunodelamancha1927
    @donbrunodelamancha1927 Рік тому

    731 Matt, I really appreciate you doing these comparisons. You do bring up I’d rather interesting point. And while the Amazon products being from China is problematic on many levels, it isn’t the main issue.
    I think a higher importance is something you point out a lot of these tools are nearly identical. And the question you ask is why are not trademark infringement‘s being enforced. I think part of the answer is China’s own unique trademark system. As well as our own unique patent system. And I believe the reason they’re able to get around them is because of the slight imperfections that you point out. And these imperfections may seem slight, but as you say, in the aggregate, they could prove to be Gamechangers.
    He also cannot put a price on a lifetime warranty. Craftsman used to be known for that. Then again, they used to be known for making a Tools so there’s that. But that is priceless.
    The real issue is that Amazon actively Corded and contracted with Chinese companies to make these tools in the image and likeness of woodpecker‘s tools. So the real Monster here is Amazon. Not the customer. In no way is it the customer. Is there some culpability at some level that’s up to the individual consumer themselves to live with their moral conscience. I am in no position to judge anyone.
    Thank you again for your seller Contant ‼️‼️‼️✊🏼✊🏼✊🏼

  • @allan5721
    @allan5721 Рік тому +4

    I try to follow what Matt Moreman of Obsessed Garage espouses, “Honor the source”, if it is something innovative that supports the industry and makes our lives / jobs / hobbies better or easier, but as a hobby wood worker, I can’t justify the price difference.

    • @joshualatendresse
      @joshualatendresse Рік тому +2

      Thank you for factoring in the research, development, and design that Woodpecker did when making these products. It’s not just the manufacturing costs: of course the Chinese copies are going to be cheaper since they were able to skip all those steps.

    • @ehisey
      @ehisey Рік тому

      Not a lot of super innovative designs in the woodpecker layout line. Not like say saw stop or even Festool (dust collection advancements mostly)

    • @allan5721
      @allan5721 Рік тому

      ​@@ehisey Sawstop is a truly innovative design, but you don't have to innovate to put a lot of time / money into design. Iterating and improving existing designs still has costs involved, and those who copy those designs inherently have to spend less to produce a similar product. I imagine that Woodpeckers also spends a lot of time and money on their manufacturing process, acquiring & testing quality materials, etc., and it is unlikely that the Chinese manufacturers do so to the same level. This is evidenced by things like Matt (731, not OG) has shown in the past, such as 3 rules from the same company all having different measurements.

    • @ehisey
      @ehisey Рік тому

      @@allan5721 Most of the stuf fin this video is just Quality control. It really does not justify the price difference. Woodpecker was not even the first to come up with some of these designs and bought them with the purchase of Blue Spruce Tool Works. QC and design is nice, but not always worth the premium. the poapline as an example is plenty accurate from the knockoff for wood working.

  • @singlefather01
    @singlefather01 Рік тому +1

    The thickness on Chinese knock off is based on mm not in inch. So you gotta measure it in mm.

  • @aaronlandry3947
    @aaronlandry3947 Рік тому

    A rule being slightly off doesn't matter in the end if that's the only measuring device being used... because all the measurements would be relative to each other and it should work out.

  • @billg7813
    @billg7813 Рік тому

    I’ve told my son that if he puts my tools into an estate sale one day, he would be wise to keep anything that says Woodpeckers

  • @grantman1148
    @grantman1148 Рік тому +1

    I hate to be "that guy" but Greg's last name is Paolini, not Paloni. He pronounces it 'Pow lini.' I've had this ruler since 2013 and there's not a project I make that I don't use it on. Aside from the pronunciation, great video.

  • @a_ham_like_me
    @a_ham_like_me Рік тому +2

    If you have ever tried to return a tool to another company for a refund/replacement, the Woodpeckers tools are worth the money.

  • @jamestroy34
    @jamestroy34 Рік тому +32

    Once again, the minor differences prove that woodpecker is on an ego trip, and are expending too much monies on their engineers, which are ramping up the cost far more than they should be. Given the economy, I’m happy to save tons of money for these minor discrepancies. The fact remains that anything woodpecker makes, has a sister copy from many companies, even outside of Chinese companies that offer products that create the same result at 3 times cheaper or better. Woodpecker needs to knock the chip off their shoulder and stop gouging customers with their overblown prices, or face being put out of business due to their competitors. With technology ever growing and getting better, woodpecker will just be a name in the past unless they wise up with their pricing. While very detailed precision matters in some cases, money is also a factor that can’t be overlooked for something that is almost identical. With the government destroying the middle class (intentionally), and the value of the dollar falling, many of us will find other alternatives to stretch out our spending. Thanks for the video Matt! Very informative 😊

    • @jacobburkett
      @jacobburkett Рік тому +4

      I COMPLETELY AGREE with you. Aside from the fact I'm on disability and can't spend the money on quality name brand tools, I've learned there are tools out there that can do the job as well as the name brand. THESE ARE NO DIFFERENT!!

    • @DavZell
      @DavZell Рік тому

      Woodpeckers are extremely expensive. That said, the cheaper knock-offs exist because there is something to copy. Until those copycat companies create original designs, we need some form of Woodpeckers, Incra, etc.

    • @FierceSleepingDog
      @FierceSleepingDog Рік тому

      Go copycats!
      Someone else's loss, I guess.

  • @andre1987eph
    @andre1987eph Рік тому

    Got my set of foxtrott chinese version today and measured accuracy of scale vs 6" Incra T Rule. It was spot on all the way out to 6" on all three rulers (test carefully and be aware of removing parallax error before yiu come to conclusion)

  • @peterzhangww
    @peterzhangww Рік тому +1

    Good comparison, but I wouldn't call them "fake" simply because they are just copycats, not counterfeit.

  • @Suntreecarpentry
    @Suntreecarpentry Рік тому

    I bought the fake on amazon. Was little ashamed. Cary in my estimate clip board….they come in handy for sketch ups. Hopefully I add the WP version to the shop wall soon!

  • @JNRII
    @JNRII Рік тому

    So, if I want to stay with US Canada, but can't afford WoodPeckers, what is the next option?

    • @731Woodworks
      @731Woodworks  Рік тому

      DFM Toolworks makes good USA made squares

    • @JNRII
      @JNRII Рік тому

      @@731Woodworks I could not find T Squares, or Saddle squares at DFM, Tay Tools, or Benchmark.

  • @billyboy9141
    @billyboy9141 Рік тому

    Hi Matt .. been watching and enjoying your channel for a while now (which is why I subscribed). I have a question which is not really related to this particular video but I couldn't find the one I was looking for. I know you are a huge fan of Taylor Toolworks and because of your reviews I have bought some items from them. I live in the UK by the way. So far I have been really pleased with the quality of what I purchased but my question is .. am I right in thinking you mentioned all of Taytools products are made in the US? I have just received a set of 4 precision squares and while they look the part I was amazed to see a nice sticker on the box saying 'Made in India'. Was I wrong to assume that everything they sell is American made?

    • @731Woodworks
      @731Woodworks  Рік тому

      Hello. I've said he is a small family owned business in the USA but his tools are sourced from various places.

    • @billyboy9141
      @billyboy9141 Рік тому

      Thanks for the instant reply. I guess I misunderstood and need to pay more attention next time!! Cheers 👊

  • @eddial5601
    @eddial5601 6 місяців тому

    I got the EXACT same set of "Pelloni" pocket rules direct from Temu for $9.40. Cuttin' out the middle man.

  • @taylormedia1000
    @taylormedia1000 Рік тому +1

    Wait a minute. Obviously, you like the Woodpecker brand, but we're looking at a price difference of $352 US between the products you mentioned. Yes, we can get into pencil-like differences when it comes to microscopic line measurements, but then you have to take into account how sharp your pencils are, and how close you actually cut. As far as warranty, I suggest you read through the fine print, factor in the return cost and don't forget the $350 price.

  • @dfu1685
    @dfu1685 Рік тому +1

    With the way you stand with Christ without fail in your videos and your blatant honesty about products I know you have given us all real unbiased reviews. Thank you! Without your consistent faithful modeling it is hard to find honest opinions out there. Just wanted you to know your hard work is so appreciated and valuable🙏🏼.

  • @TeddyR_Official
    @TeddyR_Official Рік тому +3

    If it didn’t say “Woodpeckers”, it’s not “fake”. You can call it knockoffs, imitations, etc., but not fakes.

    • @brianhmonks
      @brianhmonks Рік тому

      Woodpecker owns the Trade Dress ( red color ) and legally would be considered a counterfeit.

    • @ehisey
      @ehisey Рік тому

      ​@Brian Monks at this point, Woodpecker has pretty much lost any Dress protection due to lack of enforcement if registerd as TM and being a simple color is going to have trouble getting latham protection.

    • @brianhmonks
      @brianhmonks Рік тому

      I agree with you.

  • @AlexBuker
    @AlexBuker Рік тому

    What t square size would you recommend for building kitchen cabinets and building tool shelving for a garage?

  • @BeaulieuTodd
    @BeaulieuTodd Рік тому +1

    As has been mentioned. We can’t let a company spend three months to design, test, perfect a tool, only to them complain that the Chinese are ready to steal that work and undercut them. Paying for a woodpecker tool and supporting their skilled workers will not change your life one bit. Don’t feed the thieves.

  • @Armeanu91
    @Armeanu91 Рік тому +10

    Prices in the US are absolutely insane for tools. And almost anything else really.

  • @Cat_R_Waul
    @Cat_R_Waul Рік тому +2

    “Paloney” 😂

  • @pcast1115
    @pcast1115 Рік тому +1

    This is a great video Matt! I watch your videos and learn things all the time. I greatly appreciate American made products since I was a young man which was decades ago. I grew up in a steelworker family but Woodpeckers prices are outrageous. I greatly appreciate videos like this one very much and also like the open-minded opinion you have on tool purchase. Keep up the good work!

  • @bradymiguel
    @bradymiguel Рік тому

    Affiliate links on 🔥🔥🔥
    I been waiting to see this video before pulling the trigger. I know some are going to be spot on and some aren’t. Great video!!! Adding to the cart right now. 👍🏼

  • @rickgreene913
    @rickgreene913 Рік тому +4

    Boutique tools are nice, but they don't always offer greater utility. I'll pay a third for the cheap stuff and have more budget for the tools that really matter to me.

  • @medhygoyer65
    @medhygoyer65 Рік тому +3

    On a long term use, I prefer woodpeckers, my fake tools don't aged well.

    • @1packatak
      @1packatak Рік тому

      That’s what I’m thinking. Over time, how does the cheap one hold up? Will the numbers rub off?
      Even for someone like me who is DIY, I need all the help I can get with quality tools😂

    • @elmouto3883
      @elmouto3883 4 місяці тому

      Just buy 3 more cheap ones lol. It'll still be cheaper than one woodpeckers

  • @surlycanadian
    @surlycanadian Рік тому +1

    paolini = pah-oh-lee-nee. It’s Greg’s last name (the famous woodworker who designed the pocket rule with Woodpecker’s). Let’s all show some respect to the man and learn to say his name correctly.

  • @mpaczkow
    @mpaczkow 6 місяців тому

    What happens if you drop these knockoffs?

  • @derRoteKampfflieger
    @derRoteKampfflieger Рік тому +5

    Couple thoughts. While it's a feel good thing, the measures being exactly the same only matter if you are swapping from one tool to another mid operation. Further the continuity doesn't necessarily translate to accuracy. Lastly when testing square, what you really did was compared two unknowns. To test each (without a confirmed square) draw a line, flip the tool and draw another line. If the two are parallel you have a square tool.

    • @rifleman1873
      @rifleman1873 Рік тому +1

      If he has used the flip method to verify his check square then his method is perfectly valid. Furthermore, you can’t just flip the t-square to test t so using another verified square is a reasonable way to check it. You are not wrong, just giving another perspective.

    • @derRoteKampfflieger
      @derRoteKampfflieger Рік тому +1

      @@rifleman1873 But...he DIDN'T use the flip method. All he did was compare two unknowns. IF the test square was VERIFIED sure. But two drawn lines means nothing. He may know that, but the viewers might not. One needs to decide whether the video's intent is educational or simply promotional content. Either is fine. But be clear.

    • @Tensquaremetreworkshop
      @Tensquaremetreworkshop Рік тому

      Only valid it the edge of the test piece is straight. So you need to test this first. Two straight edges will do- it they both show it straight, and they also show each other straight, then it is straight.

  • @VE3BF
    @VE3BF Рік тому +5

    Woodpecker stuff is so over priced if you want accurate tools buy a machinest set they are more accurate and so much cheaper. Remember folks we are talking wood work here, it’s organic, what is square today may not be square next week.

  • @rexcowan4314
    @rexcowan4314 Рік тому

    This was a video I was searching/hoping for. Nicely done. I appreciate your candor in your what you prefer yet you acknowledge that the chinese tools are good for the money. I took away from this video that The Woodpecker tools are the quality choice yet people like me, ( retired, disabled, vet) can get a good tool for a reasonable price. I appreciate you . Thank you.

  • @Brian-dr2yi
    @Brian-dr2yi Рік тому +1

    Sounds like you were trying to justify overpaying for woodpeckers. You should have lined up the Amazon vs woodpeckers rulers.

  • @wcondesr
    @wcondesr Рік тому +1

    Matt... just wanted to say THANK YOU for the content, the knowledge you share and the faith you have. Please keep doing what you're doing. Working up the courage to start with some projects. I already bought some plans... Thanks again and GOD Bless!!

  • @martyf.6125
    @martyf.6125 Рік тому

    Thank you for being honest especially for us beginning woodworkers I'm glad I found your videos

  • @tollertollertoller
    @tollertollertoller Рік тому

    Woodpecker is not selling a single saddle T square; only selling in a set. Or do you have a link to a single woodpecker saddle t square? Love watching your comparisons.

    • @731Woodworks
      @731Woodworks  Рік тому

      They sell them individually on their website www.woodpeck.com/saddle-t-square.html

  • @meleader
    @meleader Рік тому

    I have a mixture of Woodpeckers and knockoffs. Never ever has this been a problem in making precision joinery. Good video!

  • @toddobrien3302
    @toddobrien3302 Рік тому +1

    If all the original innovators go out of business, who will the Chinese copy and steal from?

  • @RichardBronosky
    @RichardBronosky Рік тому +1

    15:09 I'm sorry, but "Lifetime (free from defects)" is a marketing deception. Just call it "guaranteed defect free". There's no warranty involved. It's barely a step up from "like new/slightly used/as is". Craftsman had a Lifetime Warranty.

  • @ST-0311
    @ST-0311 Рік тому +4

    To be honest, that's not what I expected, which was a beat down on the knock-offs. As it is, an Amazon tool was actually recommended over the WP.
    That's keepin' it real, bro. Nicely done.

  • @rockwithface
    @rockwithface Рік тому

    I like good tools. best in the end

  • @Wyman642
    @Wyman642 Рік тому

    I have the Paolini and like it. But honestly, I use it mostly to ensure I’m cutting the same length of a board - top and bottom on a tracksaw. I could use the Kreg product for that. I have other tools to measure square, blades, bits. So despite my spendthrift habit of buying Woodpecker, one can go with the fake red on this tool.

  • @hydroaegis6658
    @hydroaegis6658 Рік тому

    It's a piece of machined aluminum. In this day and age, ANY country can make that to the level of Woodpeckers. Now whether they care to do so...
    Also the reason the measurement marks were slightly off is because it's painted. Laser etching would guarantee consistent precision.

  • @cpwright82
    @cpwright82 10 місяців тому

    It's not just USA made; it is that Woodpeckers has spent a lot of time on the design and the knockoffs are ripping them off. Most of the Facebook ads for the fake even use the Woodpecker product videos.

  • @natesewell9402
    @natesewell9402 3 місяці тому

    I would like to see the scribing accuracy with the Saddle-T's, especially since the side ruler was off. if the scribing accuracy is off the tool is next to worthless.

  • @gpdoyon
    @gpdoyon Рік тому

    Great video! With the Cyber onday deals I was able to buy all the fake ones for $100. Woot!

  • @BobBlarneystone
    @BobBlarneystone Рік тому +1

    If the graduations are not accurate, then it's a stick, not a rule.

  • @warrenpeterson6065
    @warrenpeterson6065 3 місяці тому

    3 pce ruler set: Paolini Made in US = $160, Amazon Made in China = $29, or Temu Direct From China = $7
    T-Square: Woodpeckers Made in US = $154, Amazon Made in China = $60, or Temu Direct From China = $13
    Saddle T: Woodpeckers Made in US = $80, Amazon Made in China = $50, or Temu Direct From China = $7
    Mini Square: Woodpeckers Made in US = $48, Amazon Made in China = $12, or Temu Direct From China = $4.50
    Delve Square: Woodpeckers Made in US = $95, Amazon Made in China = $35, or Temu Direct From China = $8
    Total from Woodpeckers: $537 Total From China with Amazon Handling: $186, or Total With Direct Shipping From China: $39.50.
    Which would you buy?

  • @ianpearse4480
    @ianpearse4480 Рік тому

    Cool comparisons. Cheers.

  • @VWonder737
    @VWonder737 7 місяців тому

    14:56 ...or you just prefer blue over red.

  • @timberrecycling
    @timberrecycling Рік тому

    I got the knockoff set of 3 pocket rules after a different video of yours showing the tool. great value, really nice to have a few of them handy to "save" small measurements during a project. I like them way more than trying to use a combo square when measuring in from edges. thanks for that recommend!

  • @pokeba3299
    @pokeba3299 Рік тому +6

    Great comparisons, thank very much. Although I support the USA version, I think these USA shops are abusing our love for them with absurd prices and probably profits.

    • @handles438
      @handles438 Рік тому +2

      The CEO gotta pay for that third yacht somehow!

    • @cpthornman
      @cpthornman Рік тому

      "Made in USA" used to mean something. Now it's just there to justify an absurd price so the greedy executives can line their pockets more.

  • @naturaIIydifferent
    @naturaIIydifferent Рік тому +2

    You gotta love how our system has become so messed up that you have to be rich to afford American made tools. We gotta bring back manufacturing to America and drastically increase tariffs on China. Maybe then I can afford Woodpeckers.

  • @barriowoodworks
    @barriowoodworks Рік тому +2

    Very good comparison video.
    I also use the Delve square more often compared to my other WP tools.
    The Amazon mini-square is an interesting buy for the price

  • @yaowsers77
    @yaowsers77 Рік тому

    I love how you presented the items. This was perfect!