This symphony was composed at about the same time Joseph Haydn composed his "London" symphonies. Josph Haydn said, he created the "surprise" in his 92nd symphony because he must distinguish his works from Pleyel's symphonies.
Listen again. Schubert didn't orchestrate in the way Pleyel does here. After all Schubert's 2nd was written 25 years after this and times had moved on. It is rarely wise to make comparisons between one composers' music to another, but if you think it sounds like Schubert, good luck to you.
@@davidwahrheit6143 Very off the wall comment. Music can be described, but cannot be explained. I've given you a third of what my original comment means, I hope that you know enough about the musicology you mention, to now work out the other two thirds for yourself.
Divine sound! Paul Wranitzky composed a significant number of symphonies during the last decade of the 18th century, making him one of the leading symphonists in Vienna, if not Europe. As a result of his respected post as director of the Imperial Court theater orchestras, Wranitzky had one of Europe's finest orchestras at his disposal and, of course, a ready audience. He was also a favored composer of Empress Marie Therese, and wrote many works for the private use of her and her family (The symphony in D minor, " La Tempesta"). Where can I hear this - symphony in D minor, " La Tempesta - on the net?
Echoes of Don Giovanni in the introduction, but Allegro does not maintain entirely his promise ; beautiful 3.27 3.54 but the tension is not sustained. Contemporary symphonies of Haydn ( not to tell the last 4 by Mozart included k 504) are far superior.. But here Pleyel in some sections is very modern he looks to the future.
The opening reminds me of Mozart's overture for Don Giovanni.
This symphony was composed at about the same time Joseph Haydn composed his "London" symphonies. Josph Haydn said, he created the "surprise" in his 92nd symphony because he must distinguish his works from Pleyel's symphonies.
Very good. Great players. Wonderful!
Mov.II: Adagio 8:24 Mov.III: Menuetto e Trio. Allegretto 13:10 Mov.IV: Rondo - Allegro 18:30
Amazing sound.
Uma bela sinfonia, no mesmo nível dos compositores mais conhecidos. Nos moldes de Haydn e grande criatividade sonora.
What a great first movement
Delightful!
..splendida !!!!...
Гениальный композитор и замечательное музыкальное произведение, иногда напоминает мне Гайдна. Большое спасибо.
Now that's a symphony! Anyone notice how the first movement is very reminiscent of Schubert's 2nd.
Listen again. Schubert didn't orchestrate in the way Pleyel does here. After all Schubert's 2nd was written 25 years after this and times had moved on. It is rarely wise to make comparisons between one composers' music to another, but if you think it sounds like Schubert, good luck to you.
David A. Meant to clarify, Pleyel seems to foretell Schubert's second in the first movement.
@@DavidA-ps1qr "It is rarely wise to make comparisons between one composers' music to another". If that were the case musicology would be dead.
@@davidwahrheit6143 Very off the wall comment. Music can be described, but cannot be explained.
I've given you a third of what my original comment means, I hope that you know enough about the musicology you mention, to now work out the other two thirds for yourself.
@David Wahrheit you're right
Divine sound! Paul Wranitzky composed a significant number of symphonies during the last decade of
the 18th century, making him one of the leading symphonists in Vienna, if not
Europe. As a result of his respected post as director of the Imperial Court
theater orchestras, Wranitzky had one of Europe's finest orchestras at his
disposal and, of course, a ready audience. He was also a favored composer of
Empress Marie Therese, and wrote many works for the private use of her and her
family (The symphony in D minor, " La Tempesta"). Where can I hear this - symphony in D minor,
" La Tempesta - on the net?
ua-cam.com/video/8y2y0MfpOvU/v-deo.html
Some Don Giovanni, here and there, craftsmanship of Mozart and Haydn are at a different level. This symphony is good no doubt.
A introdução pareceu-me uma sequela do início da Abertura D. Giovanni, de Mozart.
To Pleyel we owe the upright piano I believe
first mov. is the best part.
Rather D major than D minor (except the opening bars and the second movement), but a very remarkably interesting piece.
Here you can hear a nice Pleyel pianino from 1835 with John Field : ua-cam.com/video/xjPEqNBrHo4/v-deo.html
whats the name of the picture? I saw it before and i mssed the historic background.
Wolfgang Amadeus Pleyel
O 1o mov é como Beethovem e um pouco haydn.
Echoes of Don Giovanni in the introduction, but Allegro does not maintain entirely his promise ; beautiful 3.27 3.54 but the tension is not sustained. Contemporary symphonies of Haydn ( not to tell the last 4 by Mozart included k 504) are far superior.. But here Pleyel in some sections is very modern he looks to the future.