I wear adult diapers and have an anime girl tattoo on my forehead. I also eat soy products all of the time Im such a Chad that biker gang didn't stand a chance I sent them running in fear. Don't ever mess with me.
When people started talking about people being replaced and jobs stolen by robots, I don't think anyone had ever expected artists to be one of the victims.
Fr these techbros won't know when to draw the line and eventually make AI that codes for them. Heck they already crossed the line when DeepFakes were created
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
This all frightens me. The more AI takes over doing art, the less original art we will have. We can end up in the place were new art is not created and most "new" art is simply the AI using old reference images to create new art. AI tends to fall into a circular output and if we keep training the Ai with its own results, we end up with less originality in each piece. There is also something cheap about AI artworks. They lack the importance that physicality has. No original, no real painting with a history, just a png file you can print out. And the more you use it, the less magical it becomes. I can generate a face and i will always see a few features from people with many pictures of them. Ex ever generate a middle age man and you just notice a part of the face is from obama or tom cruise, and so on.
@@Blue.Diesel isn’t most post-modern or modern art, just mixing of previous generations or genres that have already been defined? How much more unique pieces can exist before everything is a reworked piece. The human mind in itself used things it has seen or knows and replicates with little twists. I’m not saying AI Art should count as as the same type of Art, but it seems like most things that an AI takes over, they just expedited the process of creativity. Again not saying it’s good, but how much different is it than what humans would have done anyway
@@Blue.Diesel if you take an actual look at AI art, especially with the digital art stuff, you will see a lot of strange artefacting because it is drawing from references. Stuff that's super common like celebrities and popular shows are done a lot better than more obscure stuff.
@@Blue.Diesel Kind of a cringe take IMO. AI doesn't make art from nothing, it makes... artificial art, art copied from other pieces of art. If anything, this will only open up new opportunities. Unless we make a conscious intelligence one day, we'll still exclusively be the ones making original art.
There are already examples of a pretty good TTS/voice cloning engines like Tortoise, but it's pretty slow and can't do all voices good. You can see some demos on my channel. So yeah, it's not that big of a stretch.
SynthVA can take a VA's existing works and make them speak whatever they want, you only really notice when you try to get them to say words they've never said before "trying to get a voice actor from an E or T rated game say "fuck" or "pussy" it has can't handle the emphasis perfectly so it sounds a little off. The tech is really cool for the modding community because you can write whatever you want and then use SynthVA to dub the lines for you, but the tech won't stop there. Vocaloids are a bad example because Japanese only has 160 sounds in their language (as opposed to English's thousands upon thousands of unique sounds) so text to speech is much easier with the language they originated from, getting them to sing or speak in English is VERY difficult and it's not actually an AI voice. It's more like an instrument, which makes sense since it's main use is for making music.
Such a rough year for artists rn 😓 - AI art - NFTs - WB writing off a wide chunk of its animated films/shows for tax purposes (even notably popular ones like Infinity Train) - Clip Studio going for an annual subscription plan like Adobe
@@liquicitizendirk2147 A lot of artists are being fucked over by NFTs because people can steal their work and claim it as their own, not to mention how bad they are for the environment
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Problem I find with AI art is how corporations are gonna use it. AI art can never rival professional artists but it's easy to make, fast and most importantly cheap or even free. Corporations don't care about the quality of the art, if it works it's good enough
CSP has nothing to do with AI Art because it's an art program but they chose the route of Subscribtions for profits. Is it necessary to make it a Subscription and do they need so much money for an Update? No Did they defend or rather rephrase it because of the higher profits they will make? Yes It's all about money so people shouldn't wonder why even Apple wants to milk more out of its Users with just wanting to lend iPhones or add their own Ad ecosystem to their operating system
From what I understand, the main problem with AI Art that a lot of artists have is that it's actively stealing pre-existing art from artists. One AI even tried to replicate a watermark from the OG Art.
As far as I'm aware this happens less frequently than you might think. But when this does happen, part of the reason is that there are no checks put in place the see if training data is being recreated. The actual training data is no packaged with the model, and even if it was, searching over the massive amount of images the model was trained on to see if it is too similar to anything would take a massive amount of computation.
It's very muddy water to try to discern inspiration from partial stealing when it comes to art. All artists take inspiration. Should it be on a case by case basis? Or are we gonna try to draw a line between copyright and inspiration?
I mean... If we're gonna be totally honest, pretty much anything anyone has ever made is, at it's core, a copy of something else. The only difference is that the robot can't distinguish between watermark and the art itself.
Just remember, the AI takes artwork created by a many individuals, and then literally randomizes it, re-forms, and adds a sort of "spin" to the art. (This is not plagiarizing, as most artists do the same, and if it is "perfectly" plagiarized, you just run the AI again) Going off this thought, one could say the AI is now "generally speaking", taking place of those artists. There is no need for that artists anymore because the AI now replicates the "key" creativity, concepts, and personalities produced in the art.🤷♂
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
If you want to understand what is going on then just realize that every new tech development, from 3D printing, self-driving cars, AI art to something as simple as ICU robots is about taking away physical labour. Removing the human body but keeping the mind. That's it.
It’s why artist should record their process of making art it’s more entertaining for people to watch and would stick with them more, most people who see a finished artwork would just go “hey that’s pretty cool” then walk off and forget it 10seconds later
As an artist who loved drawing when I was 5, continued into my teenage years, I found solace and happiness when drawing. When I make a piece I take time cause I want to completely imprint my emotions into my painting, every piece I make is a part of me. I’m very sensitive to this cause art for me, IS my life. It’s one of the only things that keep me happy and sane in this shitty world and this is just so soul crushing. I love to show my paintings to loved ones and people cause I want them to experience the emotions I put in my paintings and this is making me so closed off with my artwork. For me it is a part of me and I’m very protective of it and I’m just a closed door artist now. Showing my paintings is like opening up my heart and since this is hurting me I don’t do it. Definitely too soft for this world.
I totally understand you. I feel the same, knowing that you get punished for choosing to put your art online just because we live in crazy times were companies are fighting with eachother on a race of power. The biggest problem that everyone miss is that these companies are trying to steal our data just for their commercial gain purposes even if it means to take us all, hiding behind unethical ways with labels like “Ai” or “research purposes” to slap a monthly subscription price in the end. This tool suppose to remove the entire creative process and that’s what people don’t understand either. This is not a camera, or photoshop were you can adapt. I find it ironic that the only way they got the imagery they did was by using a copyrighted, none consent database of actual living artists. Like it’s rotten in its core, everything it produce in the end just looks like a reflection of a confused society. “Ai progress” more like theft in times for a gray area and bad use of technology instead of solving our environmental crisis.
@@natv6294 exactly, very few times people asked themselves if they SHOULD do something instead of asking themselves if they CAN… Sad times are coming for lower income people and humanity…
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Yeah I feel you so much on this. it’s becoming the same with modern day music. Quick and easy to make repetitive music is taking over the world and blocking out the real music and people who pour their soul and emotions into their art. What scares me is that soon enough (inevitably, at this point) we will have computer generated music and this will for sure be a sad ending to human made art.
The most ironic thing about AI automation is that the physical automation/robot butler that everyone wants _does_ have a lot of money going into it, it's just way slower going scientifically. Who would have known that the most impressive feats the human brain does is balance, hand-eye coordination, and movement physics? I remember hearing somewhere that the final bosses of job automation are plumbers & electricians because their jobs are so difficult for machines to do. Corporations would love to replace these high-priced tradesmen, yet it's simply too tall a task for machines. Computationally, it seems that installing working water or electricity in a house without destroying it is way harder than driving a car cross-country, which is in turn way harder than keeping an accounting ledger or generating some paintings. Throwing a baseball up and catching it seems to take more processing than composing an entire essay about the history of baseball.
muscle memory actually takes less processing than actively thinking your action into existence. its about neuropathways reinforcing common "roads" in your brain, so to speak. the more you do something, the less you have to think about it, and simply do, whether the action is physical, mental or a split between the both. the reason machines arent good at say plumbing, electrical and post-construction work is because there are exponentially myriad variables involved - many which require high mobility, trouble shooting and above all - unpredictable scenarios in the real world. driving a semi down the highway to an unloading depot, on the other hand, only has a few variables and rules that the computer must follow. the ai need only keep track of a few variables and adjust a even less things on its side. automation essentially relies on the machines ability to tell whether its doing its job properly or not, and the more complicated a job physically, the more difficult it is for the machine to replicate. i'm not sure what youre trying to say when stating what you believe the most impressive feats the human brain is capable of. any animal on the planet is capable of maintaining equilibrium, lol. what are you going on about? in case you were wondering, yes, robots can also maintain equilibrium now too. m'thinks you're a bit behind on the state of human technology, yes?
I wear adult diapers and have an anime girl tattoo on my forehead. I also eat soy products all of the time Im such a Chad that biker gang didn't stand a chance I sent them running in fear. Don't ever mess with me.
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Most of the image generators have filters on what you can input to try and prevent lewd art entirely. Judging by how much furry commissions go for I would say that the first generator to open the floodgates will be the next Bezos
As digital art student myself, I was pretty worried about this stuff emerging, though I confidently believe it won't be able to replace the creativity of an artists brain, at least not in my life time..
Let's always remember that we're pretty bad at predicting things. Everytime an AI generated technology appeared on a specific field everyone immediately shouted "tHe RoBots wiLL sTeaL oUr JoBs". However, half of the time that never actually happens. And even if it does, it happens in small scales and it isn't a fucking global termination of jobs like most people expect it. In fact, those tools end up helping the artists themselves. Making the overal quality of art better. I'd imagine that AI generated art would be a great tool for getting quick references or inspiration for example. And niche markets will always exist. We've created powerful algorithms that create millions of polygons in order to give us ultra realistic environments for videogames. But most of the most critically acclaimed videogames have very simple and unique artstyles rather than going for realism. We have ultra high end graphics, but there's still a certain charm to pixel art that people love. The Industry won't die, it will just change in order to adapt. I do have to add that I'm not that well versed in the actual professional industry of art, I have no idea how that technology might affect artists. But
@@qwertydavid8070 very true words actually, + there will always be the desire from clients/dev teams etc.. to have their work be done by the passion of a human being and not some generated bs. Your logical comment has altered my opinion dear sir 🤝
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
That is the problem . And scary part It NO WAY right now Programer can understand How Ai do this Programer give skill of "understand" Other part Ai do it by itself no one can understand how they do that Really really scary
@@ezio934 No Just like a "seed" and a "tree" Programer only can create seed "that do not complex and every programer can understand" And feed data just like shower 'the seed' But seed grow itself grow stronger and grow complexer then seed become "a tree" That is no programer can undertsand at that point! *if it small ai program can understand most of it but it also take some time
The biggest issue with AI is that there has to be something to go off of, in the first place. Most AI have a database of pictures they pull from, then try their best to "create" their own piece. The issue with this is, it would be very easy for the AI to steal art then "make" something out of it. Then the other issue of people putting Artists work into AI's as a basis without their permission. The concept of an AI generating art is fascinating, but there's just too many issues with it as of now.
Em you say that yet theres already every single picture that could have ever existed on an online side called The tower of babel where also every text is written.
im sure it would be the same as the music industry rite? if you make a cover or use a sample from another artist you litterally owe them money. the problem heer is theres no huge body to represent artists in the same way the music lables will bring the ban hammer down on behalf of musicians.
There is a book series that I read awhile ago, The Inheritance Cycle, in it there was a race of elves that could sing (yes sing) anything they want into existence through magic. Yet there were still some individuals that honed and perfected certain crafts like artisans, blacksmiths and so on. I think this will parallel the art world very soon, people will make art so they can say definitively that they can make something on their own because they love doing it, even though it would be faster to use ai.
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
I could see a lack of artist in the future due to AI art. If everything mediocre is made by robots it’s demoralizing for aspiring artist that aren’t massively talented
I've always wanted to major in art or animation, so I could get a job in the art field, but I've been heavily thinking it over and I might just abandon that future altogether and go for something in chemistry or agriculture instead.. Concept art/design has been my dream job, but I don't think it'll even be a job for much longer.
@@vuikun This isn't fully true though. No matter how much time passes there will always be people who prefer personable items and meaningful stuff. I literally hand sew clothes and been doing it for awhile, sell each pair $200-800 always sell out and i put like 30hrs into each pair. People will always want real art. I'm also lucky though because there's a high demand for clothes relative to lets say music artists; idk like i said people still buy my hand sewn stuff. Hand sewing is also harder to replicate by robots because I use the thread itself to design if that makes sense. Alot of asymmetric and randomly placed stuff.
I actually imagine the opposite will happen. If the world becomes even more filled with mediocre art, that'll make meaningful art created by truly talented people all the more rare and valuable. A lot of the "art" that's popular right now is so one-dimensional that I feel it already could have been made by an AI. Meaningful art, however, is much more complex and I doubt an AI could ever truly "calculate" the feelings of people being conveyed through messages. It's one thing to make something that looks pretty, it's a completely different thing to make something that cuts deep.
In theory it's cool and can be pretty funny, but it's a real nightmare for artists. It was already really scary seeing our art be stolen and turned into NFTs, but now AI uses everyone's art to learn how to make it's own art. It's like a frankenstein of other people's art, meaning it's a nightmare for ownership.
Is art even that profitable nowadays? If you animate, then this shouldn't concern you yet. Or at all. But there isn't a single person in the world who thinks drawing paintings will get them somewhere in life. You chose this. A job that is no better than any other job (such as teachers, construction worker, etc.)
@@chrismclean4789 art can be profitable, yes! Art in general covers a huge range of jobs and positions and markets, and I live off what I'm currently doing. The need for art isn't going anywhere, but AI art has the potential to replace, using your example, paintings, among other types of art. Every job can be replaced, and unfortunately AI has the potential to replace artists too, for a certain audience anyway. And sure I chose to pursue art, it's not like anyone could've seen it coming that AI would start replacing _everything_ , I wasn't implying that art is somehow better than "teachers, construction workers, etc"?
@@xkcloud it's more than a tool if it's doing imagination for you even. As much as I don't think AI are entitled to rights, it's still some other entity doing a massive amount of processing that the programmer merely made algorithms for but that's it.
Good news is that people will still make art, learn how to draw and paint because part of the appeal of art is the process rather than just the result. A soulless AI can't replace the feeling of getting better at drawing, or making a crappy but funny drawing. The bad news is that people who just want results will use AI, thus putting artists out of a job. Seems we're in the era where art will become more of a hobby than a profession for most people.
As someone who just graduated with my bachelors in art with a concentration in Graphic Design, I find this to be extremely troubling. It was hard enough trying to compete with fiver designers who work for less than minimum wage, and now I have to compete with robots too. It’s really upsetting. I’ve worked my whole life for this and it’s going up in flames. Art was already becoming antiquated as is but now this really puts the nail in the coffin.
AI art may seem cool but the biggest problem is how it relies on artworks made by actual artists and generates it as an image people will claim as their own work. There's obvious watermarks in some ai generated art that it's basically theft.
So? Just pull the ages of art we have sitting in the public domain. There are probably trillions of ways you could manipulate them. Even better, just commission a mid artist for dirt cheap and polish their work using AI, and push it for a mark-up. "Not enough templates" has never been an issue.
There may be some models that just stitch various pieces of existing art together to create a new image, but the more advanced ones like DALL E and Stable Diffusion actually create entirely new images using parameters they learn from existing art. Which, if you think about it, is exactly what human artists do too. So I dunno how that can be legally regulated at all.
The question has to be asked, if even ARTISTS aren’t safe, then what the hell is? Would like to see much more pushes for UBI around the world, because right now I can see like 60% of the current workforce in the west becoming obsolete in a decade or two
And add to that the number of Eastern peoples, opressed by much of the same structure which exists here, whose jobs are already becoming obsolete, and you have a real crisis on your hands.
I kind of want work to be obsolete for the most part. I just find it sad that the work that's more or less becoming obsolete is the one I care for in any sense. Make work no one want's to do obsolete. Not work that involves passion and entertainment.
This just proves that AI art can never capture the true essence of what it’d be like for vegita to fight James cordon, art isn’t dead, the AI have failed, artists succeed once again
Yeah it mostly just takes what's already been done and remixes it a bit, but for new, completely unique pieces of art (such as fan art) it still takes a human's creativity
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
@@Cris00900340 the strongest AI still can’t draw a face for shit, and it probably never will, AI art will always look like AI art. Even the art that won the state fair, the more you look at it, the more uncanny it gets.
@@brymetheous2387 yeah, it takes humans to draw the art which the AI will reference, than humans need to fix the artwork up so it actually makes sense.
Humans will be replaced by AI people have been saying this for years not just Hawking, Everything is a conspiracy until it becomes so blatantly obvious even the brainwashed can't deny it
@@massivelegend7599 it's more of a slow burn scenario. We'll become dependent, or the AI will read all the shitty human inputs over the decent ones and it'll go crazy.
@@tackyoptic the AI people talk about ending the world is a sentient AI. These ones aren't & don't have the capabilities to be (depending on how you think sentience is developed in humans) These types of things are certainly a step in the direction of a sentient AI but I still think it's ATLEAST decades away. Likely a whole lot more
@@hemlixx3504 tbh I think a lot of artists are just being insecure about it. I really don’t think ai art is going to take over real artists all it’s going to do is help people make art themselves. known / upcoming artists will still be relevant when specific details are needed. Ai is only so flexible
I'm about to get into illustration. AI itself isn't scary per se, it's merely a tool. Consumerism is. AI will be, the way I see it, a cheaper, faster, more consistent alternative to an artist. Where I see it as being really useful is references, ideation, speeding up an animation process so that people can focus on the finer derails, basic things that don't matter that much, etc. It's far better off as an ancilla to artists than a replacement. Also, on the upside, I think this will really motivate people to be at their best. At least for me personally, it makes me want to try harder. AI will eventually be something we can't beat, but getting as close as we can sounds fun
Although ai can do better art than many people (not excluding me), it can't get that charisma that a human can implement easily. It has no set style of it's own. I don't fear ai either for this reason, i honestly just find it to be useful for getting design ideas or getting a new eye shape in order to stave off same face syndrome
@@circl3trees351 as AI gets better and better, it'll get that charisma too. Ofc, am talking about the far future. Right now though, yes. It's much easier to convey your idea to another human
Im an illustrator working for 2 merchandise companies, got alot of youtuber / twitch streamer clients who always want varied work, im using midjourney AI to help with inspiration for my pieces. I think its a valuable tool for artist, writers etc
You make a good point about how AI art can be a good alternative for low-budget content creators that need conceptual material for something they're making. I can see it being a useful tool for coming up with a concept that you can then work off of and create something truly unique. It's why I love using NovelAI - coming up with a starting basis for a narrative, putting it into NovelAI to see what it gives me, and then tweaking the result and removing unnecessary details to create something more to my own liking. And really, that's all I can see this being good for. As you demonstrated, the AI just can't feasibly replicate exactly what you want. Yes, you can give the AI a broad topic to generate art from, which resulted in the pieces that were shown at that art competition, but the moment you try to get into extremely specific detail, like specific people/characters or places, it struggles to give you exactly what you want. On top of that, the AI is controlled by a larger entity that controls what can be generated - Dall-E for example has strict guidelines against using the tool to generate content of an explicit/graphic nature, to the point that certain words are straight up blacklisted. I don't know if this applies to all of the existing AI art engines, but my point being that even with AI, you're still restricted to what the original creator allows you to generate. Of course, you could just learn how to program your own AI so that you don't have that restriction. Or you could take the far simpler approach: learn how to draw your own art, or pay an actual artist to make it for you!
all these students with their fears i’m not saying i’m blaming them but jeez calm down their concerns are ironically formulaic and express concerns that just aren’t what art is about to me
I think stable diffusion is open source so, you can just download it and train it on your own computer does require good GPU though, and you can set the filter words to whatever you want
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
@@CoachJohnMcGuirk. with that logic you should just learn how to calculate the most intense math problems and spend minutes on it instead of using a calculator to get it done much quicker. Oh and to not use the register and just calculate the prices!
Luckily it's the case that AI is really good at specific things. The capability to generalise their abilities or combine aspects from different areas of cognition is still decades off.
@@ArtamisBot I hope so Fuck everybody insulting artists and saying they should learn to code. Others should suffer the same fate with AI competition in their fields.
I feel like its important to mention: there are fairly large communities that specifically like to buy from smaller businesses because they know that a person physically spent time and effort working on it and being able to support the people who made it rather than a corporation. great video charlie
As an artist, AI can be a nice tool but shouldn't be used to replace artists. They can't get exactly what you would want if you have something in mind, but it's good for easy cheating like the state fair example.
If anything I feel like AI is cheap in the art. I feel like tedious art that would take a human months to do is way more impressive than some computer doing it. Thats just me tho
I don't think it can ever fully replace artists, as a person who does draw as a hobby, I could see this type of ai being good for stuff like general concepts of getting ideas, then drawing out some of it to draw, kind of like Pinterest I suppose. I don't think it can replace it fully due to it being more of haphazardly pasting things together with a semblance of others styles than original, made by human art.
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
If you want to understand what is going on then just realize that every new tech development, from 3D printing, self-driving cars, AI art to something as simple as ICU robots is about taking away physical labour. Removing the human body but keeping the mind. That's it.
I'm afraid we're only seeing the first iterations of this AI, it'll only learn more as time passes, and the monetary value of art will soon plunge to near zero. My suggestion is that you move on to animation, specially 3d, since the amount of data it would need to scan to get as good as it is with regular art is far greater, so you should have quite a while before the robots take over.
The only thing I want to say about AI art generators is that every time I try using one the results makes me feel like I'm having a stroke; they're so whack That said, it does feel useful for laying things out at least
It takes a little while (maybe a couple hours of playing around) to understand how to communicate your idea to the ai, but once you get it you can just churn out awesome images one after another.
There was one that I toyed around with the other day. (I will state up front that it has issues with faces.) I internally ship two characters from vastly different genres and art styles (heck, one is from a sci-fi TV show and the other is from a fantasy video game series), and have never seen fanart of said ship despite some past searches. Except for the previously mentioned face issue, it hit the nail right on the head.
@@agent7103 Jeez, now I'm curious what you ship, but I won't pry :y What I keep playing with is centaurs. It gets almost nauseating when they try to blend the two halves/account for the limbs; let alone the facial issues everyone else has run into at least once. Honestly, I'm probably just better off drawing things my damn self :'y
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Ai art is cool but damn it's scary to think it'll wipe out a lot of jobs in the future but I guess artist will be more like heavy editors and Main creatives
@@McBernes it’ll go the way of AI playing chess where we realize it’s no fun to just be defeated by a computer every single time, so human players are still relevant
When the camera was invented, people said that art was dead (meaning art will be replaced) because a machine can capture things in such a realistic fashion in a quarter of the time an artist could. They now co-exist. I think the same will happen. The artist won't ever be fully replaced, the AI is now a tool for other artists to master how it works better than another person and build upon it.
Im sure scribes, tailors, shoe makers all had the same thoughts at the turn of the industrial revolution. Progress is inevitable. You can cry about it and be left behind or do what humans have done since recorded history: adapt.
@@notsocommie that’s the beauty of ai, it’s a snowball effect of progress. As it gets faster and more efficient so too will the rate of research. Short of a global ban, next to impossible to prevent this. Exciting or terrifying times ahead.
The difference is that photorealism was never the only art movement. There was never an argument for cameras taking over art and cameras fundamentally work differently on every single level. There is almost no comparison.
"In the future people will be able to take credit for AI art" This is something people can do now. Tell me the art at 3:25 doesn't look real. At the very least, someone can do minimal edits to fix inconsistencies and still take credit
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Personally speaking, it's improved my own art in the way that it can help me create prompts for my pieces that I would never have thought of- as well as making it super easy to see how certain color ratios work before I even put anything on paper.
@@brunomenezes9011 This is great for art. Finally people will look at art for what it is instead of something like "passion and expressing your deepest emotion" it is "Art is Art" This is a great time to weed out bad artists from the populance that continue to ruin the idea. I wish the same could be done to music.
yeaah this makes me really sad :( ive been an artist for years and im finally getting to a point where im getting lots of commissions and a platform but now im worried that once im an adult i wont be able to have art commissions on the side because of this i think the ai is amazing but im really worried
For me there is a huge difference in analog and digital Art. I love the emense depth you have with different layers, shadows and all that. This is a big part of what I love about Art.
As an artist I'm really not afraid of the AI generated art tools that are coming out. I see as a means of reference gathering. I had an AI make me some spaceship designs and what came out was nothing short of amazing. I could turn these ships into 3D models and make animations with them. If used correctly this could in some cases Really help artists.
You're the most reasonable artist I've seen, most are trying to cope with their anxiety by pretending that regular art has some "magic" to it that must be valued, but the truth is that no one, other than artists, can really tell that something was made by AI (for now). Therefore, you must make yourself MORE valuable, by using the AI as a tool to create things that are still going to be valued for at least some time(such as the things you mentioned you were doing). Tho, by the time those things are replaced, we'll prob be like cyborgs or something.
I definitely agree with this. As an artist my first reaction is straight up fear, but when I think into it, I don't think it could totally replace artists and there are just too many issues with copyright and whatnot that I really do not think it is that profitable either. But using it as a tool for artists to compile references based on their ideas to then morph/edit/adjust something into their own work- is a beautiful thing. I think the ability for creative people who don't necessarily have skills to be able to convert their ideas into art is another great thing, yet part of me regrets spending so much of my life working hard refining my skills when soon it seems it will be null. But maybe I'm just pretentious like that. We all fear change in some respect, right?
@@notsocommie majority of heavy lifting will be done by AI. Think far ahead, in a society where art world has such low barrier of entry. What will it be to the art market??
I feel like human art will become extra special. Just like hand made furniture. I'll put amazon basics furniture in bathrooms and bedrooms. But when it comes to a centerpiece for my home only a hand crafted peice carved from real wood will do. Craftsman just get to put more love into each peice compared to before mass production.
2:49 this is also gonna be useful for things like, Bruce buffer. He's the voice of the UFC, and when he retires people are trying to find a replacement, but i think by the time he retires, we'll be able to just technologically imitate his voice, so that it stays around
Honestly, I see AI art working best as a tool not to replace artists, but to supplement them greatly, especially as reference material. Whereas I can look up "two people eating dinner" and use a photo as reference for my drawing, I can't exactly look up, say, "two people eating dinner inside a Dali painting in Dragon Ball Z style". But I CAN plug that phrase into an AI art generator it'll spit out some results I can use as reference for my drawing easy peasy. I hope more artists come to see it like that instead of some boogeyman that's coming for your furry commissions.
This whole discussion really boils down to are you eating good as an artist. If you are working in a black company or barely surviving on furry commissions then you can see it as a boogeyman whos after your job or a new way for you to get paid less. Art in general wont die, the best are still going to eat good and those who are barely surviving needs to adapt or they will be replaced by new generation of artist.
Eventually it will surpass the abilities of any and all artists. That goes for basically any profession though. Robots and artificial intelligence will take over every aspect of human life sooner or later. It just seems that artists are under threat a tad bit sooner.
My comments keep getting auto deleted for some reason (so if they return sorry for spam), but I wanted to mention theres a plugin that combines both photoshop and stab. diff. It basically allowed the user to write props and it would fix the image / add stuff based on what you wrote, that plus manually changes allows for some pretty insane results and way more control.
Just like 3d modelling can supplement traditional art so much by not having to set up a photoshoot to get pose references this can do the same. It’s a great supplement and a huge time saver. Companies like blizzard can now ai generate characters, environments, enemies based on their own artistic libraries. Talented artists can then refine and tweak these images instead of sketching for hours to get close to where you want to start your design
You know, I decided to try out one of these art AI things. I used a collage AI that makes art based off of a collage of images you feed it. I went on Google Images and made a collage of all my favorite things in life and gave it to the AI. I called it "Everything I Like". What it gave me back was literally just a bunch of disgusting looking nonsense... It gave me some perspective, actually. Each one of those images had a deeper meaning behind them and had emotions from human experiences attached to them. For example, one of the images was the UA-cam icon for my favorite comedian / content creator. It makes me feel things to even see that icon. The AI doesn't understand the deeper meaning behind how those images make me feel, and I don't think it's capable of understanding them either. To the AI, it's all just a bunch of pixels. I highly doubt now that AI will ever truly replace human art.
To me it just feels like an advanced tool to make art, the way to use it will also determine the quality of the output. So effectively used it can easily make better art than a lot of people
@Jamie Last Lol no, did I sound triggered in that comment? No, I was just stating a fact. The idea behind art is that if it has meaning to the viewer, then it has meaning. Since I'm in such a good mood, I'll introduce you to some of my favorite works of art. It would be difficult for you to argue that these things don't have meaning, and even if you did try to argue, millions of people around the world would disagree with you, so you'd be wrong. For music: Kendrick Lamar: Sing About Me Black Boy Fly Real Nas: Doo Rags A Queen's Story Stay James Blake: Don't Miss It Power On Coming Back For books, two of my favorite fictional books are extreme influences on the biggest branches of philosophy: Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche The Plague by Albert Camus And keep in mind, this is just a sample of MY personal favorite works of art. I don't even read books or listen to other genres, tbh. It doesn't even include all of my favorites, nor does it include all the work in the world that I don't know about. So yeah, you can try to argue with that, if you'd like.
I tried my hometown city in Van Gogh’s style and it’s actually fucking insane. This AI art is no joke. I’m legit about to get this printed onto a canvas to hang in my house it’s so damn good. It’s just the skyline of Downtown Atlanta in the style of Starry Nights. This program is mind blowing fr😭
I don’t mind AI art at all, I think it’s cool to create stuff. But like I hate people who try to pass it off as like actual art that they say they spent hours on. People are winning art contests with AI and I find that so unfair to people who genuinely try their best to make a good art piece by themselves.
I wear adult diapers and have an anime girl tattoo on my forehead. I also eat soy products all of the time Im such a Chad that biker gang didn't stand a chance I sent them running in fear. Don't ever mess with me.
To all the people telling artists to get a “real job” or that AI is “skill diffing” artists, are just mad that someone is trying to make a living doing what they love. No self-respecting person in an actual profession they love working in would be happy with AI replacing their passion/career. And the “wage slaves” (of which I am) that are miserable in their everyday soul crushing jobs should direct their anger elsewhere, like maybe making it so you wouldn’t be homeless, or at least provided the minimum amount of a livable wage doing something you love, or are passionate about. Like imagine AI UA-camr’s like literal V-tubers but deep faked into real people, and with no actual person behind it, just an AI algorithm built on millions of hours of twitch streams, let’s plays, prank channels, podcasts, docu-series, and a bunch of commentary videos. Would they replace Charlie? Maybe who knows 🤷♀️
That Vtuber thing would be cool. I hate the idea of AI Art completely replacing artists (which will never happen or will still take a while because there is always a niche) but if we lose Art to AI then I'm willing to throw the whole creative industry over board.
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
As an Artist I will use this to speed up the process for my Manga. Backgrounds and such without needing an assistant for the more monotonous aspects of drawing. Will still do lots of the work though .
As a person that wants to become a future manga artist/animator, this scares me and may make me lose motivation if ai art programers start to steal artworks of others. If they are able to make full on masterpieces of art then just maybe they can make masterpieces of animations making there no point for me to work hard to become an manga artist/animator.
AI is good at generating multiple things in multiple styles (or whatever you chose) very quickly. It sucks currently at staying consistent. A comic strip would be way more complex for the AI to handle than a single concept art, and it's easier to have your own style in it versus the digital concept art you see online made for games and movies (many have similar looks), so in that regard you are safe.
I have genuinely found 2 album covers for my music that I'll never release/create through doing midjourney through the tags "Ronald McDonald doing a sick kickflip" and "Kenny Powers meeting God with ambience"
I don't think Art will be taken over by AI considering the fact that there are countless artists with ''skill'' and ''talent'', but what separates artists from each other is unique perspective, style and story. Considering AI art tools churn out a randomly generated image based on prompts in a style that replicates human artists work, the unique perspective, style and story behind AI works of art will all be the same. Worst case scenario is individual AI bots will be considered as individual artists and possibly have their place in galleries amongst human artists. BUT, once the story of ''AI creates art'' becomes passé, AI generated art won't make waves in the art world and will die out. The REAL industry that this technology may kill is the graphic design industry.
Agreed! One of the biggest pulls of an artist is their unique style that appeals to people based on subjectivity. Things like abstract art and concepts I don't believe could be executed the same with a computer because AI doesn't feel or connect with things as we do. I personally believe art can only be made by conscious entities that create based on the concept of free will. (Whether or not free will exists is another discussion lol)
You're not thinking about this from the right perspective. Eventually you won't be able to tell the difference between AI art and human art. People will submit AI generated art to artshows as their own, and once that becomes common place it will be human art that dies out.
AI-generators are like shooting a minigun far down range, you might hit the bullseye after throwing so much at it, but without much intention or thought behind it. The corollary for an artist is a rifle - take time to aim, shoot, adjust if required.
Scary thing about that is that there is AI that can create new music by feeding it samples. It's not as advanced as the Art AI but I can definitely see it coming next
I’m not going to lie, as an artist, AI art makes me super depressed. Knowing I could be phased out and not get a job in a few years due to AI kills my soul. I’m trying to remain mostly optimistic! I’d like to think that AI cant completely get rid of an artist and they’ll always be a market for us, but man, idk.
I think many art professions are just irreplaceable. Like yes the A.I did a beautiful piece that even won a fair or whatever. But I strongly doubt A.I can ever do concept art like we can. I doubt it can ever animate as well as we can. Not in the near future at least.
@@Wolvahulk and even when it can, the soullessness will be so blatant that people who otherwise wouldn’t give two shits about art will start offering backlash.
You can actually draw a concept what it should draw what sources it should use and from what artist it should copy the style in some programs. Imagine being able to use the style of every artist you want and being able to draw complex poses by creating a concept with poses, eye placement and emotion suggestions it can orientate itself on. I take huge issues typing the name of an artists especially.
@@jeremykyleinvestigatesall8227 Ah, as we can see, an armchair troll in the wild prowling the comment section! Beware, for they are very sensitive about comebacks!
@@jeremykyleinvestigatesall8227 Art is a real job dude, always has been. Pretty much every single mainstream movie or game you’ve ever watched or played was worked on by hundreds of artists
The one field that I can bet it will absolutely damage the actual artist amount is environmental concept artist, the AI art already adds the level of fidelity and detail that most concept artist use during pitches so expect many be moved into other concept sectors
I was literally just at the Colorado state fair today and I will admit I didn’t even notice this. I walked through the entire two art/poster galleries.
I've seen co-pilot and was not impressed. If SD is as threatening to art as co-pilot to my job, they only artists that should feel threatened are the artists that should not ne in the field to begin with. Imagine they can no longer ask for 4 digits sums to delvier minimalistic logo with a cube and three letters on its sides. AI is death for artists like this. Other would adapt as much as they adapted content aware fill.
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety Of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
This is genuinely terrifying to me. There was a period where AI art was very vague, so artists could expand and interpret what they saw, and make it their own. Now, it's utterly effortless
I just hope there is always a huge distinction between human made and AI made. I really like the idea because it means I can get really awesome stuff for my projects whereas before that was just something I would never have. But at the same time, I don't want to see people lose their livelihood to this.
I think the thing about AI art is that it best works as inspiration, not its own thing. I would much prefer typing in a prompt and drawing something similar to what it created than just using the actual prompt
Ai art is asthetically pleasing and in that way alone does it beat humans. But art isn't only about aesthetics, it's about the cultural references, the story, the depth, theres so much more to art that's beyond mere aesthetics. A picture is worth a thousand words as cliche as that is, it's true, and the AI doesn't yet know how to transpose those words and ideas into a work of art. I think it will be a while before I see a peice of AI art that can tear me up inside and bring me to tears or induce some strong emotion thats entire unexplainable.
No, art is aesthetic. I'm tired of pretending otherwise with all the lazy "art" and modern shit that sells for millions. I'm not only talking about the art that is obvious money laundering and all that but architecture, and sculptures. There has to be a standard to all of it it can't all be "subjective" and all that shit. If AI takes over "artists" jobs than so be it.
Sure but what are the chances that ai can achieve that? Even if you say 0,001%, that just means it creates millions of images in less than a day so theres atleast 1 that fulfills that criteria. Then it learns from that and has a higher and higher chance of achieving the same result. Its like a baby, just that it learns 1000% faster, doesnt age and will eventually rule over all humanity :3
@@luisortiz8893 I'm not saying art is not about aesthetics, but rather other things. I said it's NOT ONLY about aesthetics. Aesthetics are certainly part of it, and imo, aesthetics are only the mere surface layer of 'art'. But art is much deeper, and when you see a piece of art that has a physical affect on you, then maybe you will understand what I'm talking about.
@@NatnatXS if you value art for only it's aesthetics, sure. And it's not as if the amazing works of art done in the past didn't have precise intent behind them. I'd rather have the professional dart player on my team, than a machine that spits out a dozen random darts in every direction hoping to land a bullseye. This whole art ai thing is cool and amazing, but it's nowhere close to our great artists of the past and current times. It's really just a glorified chess engine, but with pictures instead os pieces.
All the tech bros who scream "cope" at artists morning the death of their craft are now getting a taste of their own bullsh1t. Maybe I'll have MidJourney draw a sad tech bro in tribute.
@@strayiggytv the loss of a career is devastating. You got to be pretty heartless to make fun of someone for that. However ai generated code like ai generated art is an incredible tool, but not a replacement for the real thing. I still think tech is gonna be reasonably stable career outlook for those with aptitude
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
There's definitely some points to be made in regard to how legit AI art is in terms of artistic merit. 1. Is it really your art if you didn't create the AI to begin with? It would seem to me like the developer has most if not all the merit. 2. To what extent can the produced art be considered original? AI is fueled by the process of machine learning. Everything the AI produces derivates from the input it is fed, and in many cases the output looks more like a distorted version of 1 specific input image than anything remotely original. The artwork that won that one contest might look good but there might be some piece of artwork that was fed to it at some point with an extreme resemblance to it.
I’ve seen firsthand some ai art that I made that was extremely similar to an image I had already seen. Still though, not all ai art is like that. I think that whether or not we want it to happen, ai art is going to become way more powerful/cost efficient as it becomes more advanced
I notice the second point a lot for general terms that have no generic example - when prompted something like car it'll just spit out some heavily resembling an already existing model (saw an image with a 720s and another with a lotus evora), instead of actually imagining a supercar or at least mashing some together. Kind of breaks the illusion of creativity :/
While that is how AI creates art, it's also how we as humans do it because our brains are literally just the exact same thing, learning machines, but biological and made over millions of years of evolution. You may not be thinking of those pieces of art directly, but they are influencing your artwork at the end of the day. The main difference between human and machine right now is dataset. Humans see stuff about 16 hours of a day, every day for their entire life, machines don't because that's a lot of data to process/store. The day they do is the day they surpass humans and no longer will generic prompts look similar.
i fear people gonna call AI art as their own ‘talent’
we already have a world full of impostors and talentless individuals who are celebrated, so you are 100 percent correct.
Can't wait to start my own commission gig and just use AI lmao, strike while the knife is hot as they say.
I wear adult diapers and have an anime girl tattoo on my forehead. I also eat soy products all of the time Im such a Chad that biker gang didn't stand a chance I sent them running in fear. Don't ever mess with me.
Thats inevitably gonna happen and its sad
Who els got scammed by a fake ai art app.
“In the future entertainment will be randomly generated”
I feel the writers of Veggietales knew a lot more than they let on
They predicted the future
@Audrey Jones So is your dad lmao
don't give the robot attention
This right here converted me to christianity
REPENT TO JESUS NOW REPENT TO JESUS NOWWWWWWWWWWWW!!!
When people started talking about people being replaced and jobs stolen by robots, I don't think anyone had ever expected artists to be one of the victims.
Fr these techbros won't know when to draw the line and eventually make AI that codes for them. Heck they already crossed the line when DeepFakes were created
@@otapic AI that codes for you (partially, obvi) already exists and is one of the first things they started development on.
@@HOUROFPOW3R it can be pretty dumb sometimes
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Carl in detroit become human,
Note for Charlie: “in the style of” works way better than “art by”.
The AI is designed to interpret sentences, rather than code words how Google does.
This all frightens me. The more AI takes over doing art, the less original art we will have.
We can end up in the place were new art is not created and most "new" art is simply the AI using old reference images to create new art.
AI tends to fall into a circular output and if we keep training the Ai with its own results, we end up with less originality in each piece.
There is also something cheap about AI artworks. They lack the importance that physicality has.
No original, no real painting with a history, just a png file you can print out.
And the more you use it, the less magical it becomes.
I can generate a face and i will always see a few features from people with many pictures of them.
Ex ever generate a middle age man and you just notice a part of the face is from obama or tom cruise, and so on.
@@Blue.Diesel isn’t most post-modern or modern art, just mixing of previous generations or genres that have already been defined? How much more unique pieces can exist before everything is a reworked piece. The human mind in itself used things it has seen or knows and replicates with little twists. I’m not saying AI Art should count as as the same type of Art, but it seems like most things that an AI takes over, they just expedited the process of creativity. Again not saying it’s good, but how much different is it than what humans would have done anyway
@@Blue.Diesel if you take an actual look at AI art, especially with the digital art stuff, you will see a lot of strange artefacting because it is drawing from references. Stuff that's super common like celebrities and popular shows are done a lot better than more obscure stuff.
@@Blue.Diesel "most 'new art is simply the AI using old reference images to create new art."
That's...how imagination *works,* dude...
@@Blue.Diesel Kind of a cringe take IMO. AI doesn't make art from nothing, it makes... artificial art, art copied from other pieces of art. If anything, this will only open up new opportunities. Unless we make a conscious intelligence one day, we'll still exclusively be the ones making original art.
I truly cannot imagine where technology will be in 15 years. I remember being shocked by Snapchat filters a mere 6 years ago
*I MAKE FIRE CONTENT🔥🔥🔥*
You are old?
*15 years later*
''back in my day we used to draw art with toil and sweat!, nowadays you just type to make art, you arent real artists!''
@@charlestonianbuilder344 people would still make that shit into an NFT or smth and sell it for millions...
@@charlestonianbuilder344 That's justified tho
Up next:
Voice actors: "Learn to code."
*AI generated voices become perfected*
Thats probably gonna hurt VA's more than this hurts artists.
There are already examples of a pretty good TTS/voice cloning engines like Tortoise, but it's pretty slow and can't do all voices good. You can see some demos on my channel. So yeah, it's not that big of a stretch.
Vocaloid's already sing better than non singers so yeah. If they can get up to par, even musicians and singers are fucked.
As someone studying computer science I will refrain from saying "learn to code" to delay the technological singularity as much as possible.
SynthVA can take a VA's existing works and make them speak whatever they want, you only really notice when you try to get them to say words they've never said before "trying to get a voice actor from an E or T rated game say "fuck" or "pussy" it has can't handle the emphasis perfectly so it sounds a little off. The tech is really cool for the modding community because you can write whatever you want and then use SynthVA to dub the lines for you, but the tech won't stop there.
Vocaloids are a bad example because Japanese only has 160 sounds in their language (as opposed to English's thousands upon thousands of unique sounds) so text to speech is much easier with the language they originated from, getting them to sing or speak in English is VERY difficult and it's not actually an AI voice. It's more like an instrument, which makes sense since it's main use is for making music.
Such a rough year for artists rn 😓
- AI art
- NFTs
- WB writing off a wide chunk of its animated films/shows for tax purposes (even notably popular ones like Infinity Train)
- Clip Studio going for an annual subscription plan like Adobe
With some artists making more money than they ever did before I don't see how NFTs are so onesidedly bad. Care to explain?
We all need know Nft creators aren't 'artist'
@@liquicitizendirk2147 A lot of artists are being fucked over by NFTs because people can steal their work and claim it as their own, not to mention how bad they are for the environment
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
@@ItzMalick this is an easy way to fucking obliterate your chances at growing
Problem I find with AI art is how corporations are gonna use it. AI art can never rival professional artists but it's easy to make, fast and most importantly cheap or even free. Corporations don't care about the quality of the art, if it works it's good enough
True
"Corporate art" already looks so fucking shit you couldn't tell it's actually made by a human
@@pizzarella985 Did you even watch the video or are you blind?
@@Kidey11 I didn't lmao, I'm just interested in the discussion of AI art and it replacing real artists. Sorry if I reiterated a point already made.
CSP has nothing to do with AI Art because it's an art program but they chose the route of Subscribtions for profits.
Is it necessary to make it a Subscription and do they need so much money for an Update? No
Did they defend or rather rephrase it because of the higher profits they will make? Yes
It's all about money so people shouldn't wonder why even Apple wants to milk more out of its Users with just wanting to lend iPhones or add their own Ad ecosystem to their operating system
Hearing "Homestuck" come out of Charlie's mouth is terrifying.
was not prepared for that 🧎
I was horrified 😭
I feel so sorry for Charlie's mouth. Hope it gets better after saying that word
no exactly i had to do a rewind to make sure i caught it right
What's a homestuck?
From what I understand, the main problem with AI Art that a lot of artists have is that it's actively stealing pre-existing art from artists. One AI even tried to replicate a watermark from the OG Art.
True
As far as I'm aware this happens less frequently than you might think. But when this does happen, part of the reason is that there are no checks put in place the see if training data is being recreated. The actual training data is no packaged with the model, and even if it was, searching over the massive amount of images the model was trained on to see if it is too similar to anything would take a massive amount of computation.
It's very muddy water to try to discern inspiration from partial stealing when it comes to art. All artists take inspiration. Should it be on a case by case basis? Or are we gonna try to draw a line between copyright and inspiration?
I mean... If we're gonna be totally honest, pretty much anything anyone has ever made is, at it's core, a copy of something else. The only difference is that the robot can't distinguish between watermark and the art itself.
Just remember, the AI takes artwork created by a many individuals, and then literally randomizes it, re-forms, and adds a sort of "spin" to the art.
(This is not plagiarizing, as most artists do the same, and if it is "perfectly" plagiarized, you just run the AI again)
Going off this thought, one could say the AI is now "generally speaking", taking place of those artists. There is no need for that artists anymore because the AI now replicates the "key" creativity, concepts, and personalities produced in the art.🤷♂
I’m shitting myself as an artist, I feel like it could be an amazing tool but I don’t want people passing Ai art off as their own
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
If you want to understand what is going on then just realize that every new tech development, from 3D printing, self-driving cars, AI art to something as simple as ICU robots is about taking away physical labour. Removing the human body but keeping the mind. That's it.
it is tho
@@jameslewis2132 x to doubt
It’s why artist should record their process of making art it’s more entertaining for people to watch and would stick with them more, most people who see a finished artwork would just go “hey that’s pretty cool” then walk off and forget it 10seconds later
As an artist who loved drawing when I was 5, continued into my teenage years, I found solace and happiness when drawing. When I make a piece I take time cause I want to completely imprint my emotions into my painting, every piece I make is a part of me. I’m very sensitive to this cause art for me, IS my life. It’s one of the only things that keep me happy and sane in this shitty world and this is just so soul crushing. I love to show my paintings to loved ones and people cause I want them to experience the emotions I put in my paintings and this is making me so closed off with my artwork. For me it is a part of me and I’m very protective of it and I’m just a closed door artist now. Showing my paintings is like opening up my heart and since this is hurting me I don’t do it. Definitely too soft for this world.
I totally understand you.
I feel the same, knowing that you get punished for choosing to put your art online just because we live in crazy times were companies are fighting with eachother on a race of power.
The biggest problem that everyone miss is that these companies are trying to steal our data just for their commercial gain purposes even if it means to take us all, hiding behind unethical ways with labels like “Ai” or “research purposes” to slap a monthly subscription price in the end.
This tool suppose to remove the entire creative process and that’s what people don’t understand either. This is not a camera, or photoshop were you can adapt.
I find it ironic that the only way they got the imagery they did was by using a copyrighted, none consent database of actual living artists.
Like it’s rotten in its core, everything it produce in the end just looks like a reflection of a confused society.
“Ai progress” more like theft in times for a gray area and bad use of technology instead of solving our environmental crisis.
@@natv6294 exactly, very few times people asked themselves if they SHOULD do something instead of asking themselves if they CAN…
Sad times are coming for lower income people and humanity…
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Yeah I feel you so much on this. it’s becoming the same with modern day music. Quick and easy to make repetitive music is taking over the world and blocking out the real music and people who pour their soul and emotions into their art. What scares me is that soon enough (inevitably, at this point) we will have computer generated music and this will for sure be a sad ending to human made art.
AI is just a tool for you to use in your own art. It can't replace you, it only makes certain things easier.
The most ironic thing about AI automation is that the physical automation/robot butler that everyone wants _does_ have a lot of money going into it, it's just way slower going scientifically. Who would have known that the most impressive feats the human brain does is balance, hand-eye coordination, and movement physics? I remember hearing somewhere that the final bosses of job automation are plumbers & electricians because their jobs are so difficult for machines to do. Corporations would love to replace these high-priced tradesmen, yet it's simply too tall a task for machines.
Computationally, it seems that installing working water or electricity in a house without destroying it is way harder than driving a car cross-country, which is in turn way harder than keeping an accounting ledger or generating some paintings. Throwing a baseball up and catching it seems to take more processing than composing an entire essay about the history of baseball.
*I MAKE FIRE CONTENT🔥🔥🔥*
muscle memory actually takes less processing than actively thinking your action into existence. its about neuropathways reinforcing common "roads" in your brain, so to speak. the more you do something, the less you have to think about it, and simply do, whether the action is physical, mental or a split between the both. the reason machines arent good at say plumbing, electrical and post-construction work is because there are exponentially myriad variables involved - many which require high mobility, trouble shooting and above all - unpredictable scenarios in the real world. driving a semi down the highway to an unloading depot, on the other hand, only has a few variables and rules that the computer must follow. the ai need only keep track of a few variables and adjust a even less things on its side. automation essentially relies on the machines ability to tell whether its doing its job properly or not, and the more complicated a job physically, the more difficult it is for the machine to replicate. i'm not sure what youre trying to say when stating what you believe the most impressive feats the human brain is capable of. any animal on the planet is capable of maintaining equilibrium, lol. what are you going on about? in case you were wondering, yes, robots can also maintain equilibrium now too. m'thinks you're a bit behind on the state of human technology, yes?
@@TheMarcosvolta If the task changes fully over and over again with a ton of skills which use all parts of the brain then it's harder to do
@Kavetion 🤓
@@TheMarcosvolta Okay, the passive aggression at the end was unnecessary.
Charlie is so smart and talented he can make us think his art is AI, you can’t fool me
@YeaMan Charlie drew/painted the Mona Lisa
@The real Ludwig van Beethoven Facts bro, these fools don’t understand Charlie’s speed and precision is super human 💯🙌
..... These comments are so cringe
I wear adult diapers and have an anime girl tattoo on my forehead. I also eat soy products all of the time Im such a Chad that biker gang didn't stand a chance I sent them running in fear. Don't ever mess with me.
@@BusterNut facts there’s so many bots
The moment AI can generate good quality lewds by just typing in a popular character's name and a position humanity is doomed.
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
You are 100% correct
Most of the image generators have filters on what you can input to try and prevent lewd art entirely.
Judging by how much furry commissions go for I would say that the first generator to open the floodgates will be the next Bezos
@@SherrifOfNottingham plus with the incredible amount of reference material out there
That's really all I'm looking forward to. Not much else to use this for other than claiming AI art as your own.
As digital art student myself, I was pretty worried about this stuff emerging, though I confidently believe it won't be able to replace the creativity of an artists brain, at least not in my life time..
Unless you're gonna die within the next decade, then I'd be worried.
Let's always remember that we're pretty bad at predicting things. Everytime an AI generated technology appeared on a specific field everyone immediately shouted "tHe RoBots wiLL sTeaL oUr JoBs".
However, half of the time that never actually happens. And even if it does, it happens in small scales and it isn't a fucking global termination of jobs like most people expect it. In fact, those tools end up helping the artists themselves. Making the overal quality of art better. I'd imagine that AI generated art would be a great tool for getting quick references or inspiration for example. And niche markets will always exist. We've created powerful algorithms that create millions of polygons in order to give us ultra realistic environments for videogames. But most of the most critically acclaimed videogames have very simple and unique artstyles rather than going for realism. We have ultra high end graphics, but there's still a certain charm to pixel art that people love. The Industry won't die, it will just change in order to adapt.
I do have to add that I'm not that well versed in the actual professional industry of art, I have no idea how that technology might affect artists. But
@@qwertydavid8070 very true words actually, + there will always be the desire from clients/dev teams etc.. to have their work be done by the passion of a human being and not some generated bs. Your logical comment has altered my opinion dear sir 🤝
Ai art to me is the worse art with pretty paint. Nothing impress me at all.
*Charlie:* _"Learn to code"_
*Also Charlie:* _"I wonder who's gonna say learn to code and eat it"..._
*The A.I. :* _"Moistverse_2.5.EXE ...now installing."_
*I MAKE FIRE CONTENT🔥🔥🔥*
😂😂😂
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
5 bots on one comment, peak youtube moment.
@@FederalBeurauofInvestigations Good try Mr 6th bot. Ain't foolin' me dawg.
I don't feel threatened by AI. I feel threatened by the programmers who can make this happen.
That is the problem . And scary part
It NO WAY right now
Programer can understand How Ai do this
Programer give skill of "understand"
Other part Ai do it by itself no one can understand how they do that
Really really scary
even programmers will be replaced by ai
@@zueszues9715 no, every programmer know how their AI works. Making an AI is the easiest part. The hard part is feeding it good data.
@@ezio934 and because people are inherently fucked up on the internet, it almost always turns to absolute shit
@@ezio934
No
Just like a "seed" and a "tree"
Programer only can create seed "that do not complex and every programer can understand"
And feed data just like shower 'the seed'
But seed grow itself grow stronger and grow complexer then seed become "a tree"
That is no programer can undertsand at that point! *if it small ai program can understand most of it but it also take some time
The biggest issue with AI is that there has to be something to go off of, in the first place. Most AI have a database of pictures they pull from, then try their best to "create" their own piece. The issue with this is, it would be very easy for the AI to steal art then "make" something out of it. Then the other issue of people putting Artists work into AI's as a basis without their permission. The concept of an AI generating art is fascinating, but there's just too many issues with it as of now.
But that's already how our brains work.
As the saying goes, there's nothing new under the sun. Everything's derivative.
Em you say that yet theres already every single picture that could have ever existed on an online side called The tower of babel where also every text is written.
im sure it would be the same as the music industry rite? if you make a cover or use a sample from another artist you litterally owe them money. the problem heer is theres no huge body to represent artists in the same way the music lables will bring the ban hammer down on behalf of musicians.
yeah so does the human mind, the mind doesn't create a new artwork, it just has an abstract collage, and rest is up to technique and practice
There is a book series that I read awhile ago, The Inheritance Cycle, in it there was a race of elves that could sing (yes sing) anything they want into existence through magic.
Yet there were still some individuals that honed and perfected certain crafts like artisans, blacksmiths and so on.
I think this will parallel the art world very soon, people will make art so they can say definitively that they can make something on their own because they love doing it, even though it would be faster to use ai.
Favorite book series for me ;)
Eragon was damn good
I have read the inheritance cycle too many times to count. Amazing book series❤
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
Bruh thats just Eragon and everyone read that.
I could see a lack of artist in the future due to AI art. If everything mediocre is made by robots it’s demoralizing for aspiring artist that aren’t massively talented
I've always wanted to major in art or animation, so I could get a job in the art field, but I've been heavily thinking it over and I might just abandon that future altogether and go for something in chemistry or agriculture instead..
Concept art/design has been my dream job, but I don't think it'll even be a job for much longer.
bad take
@@vuikun This isn't fully true though. No matter how much time passes there will always be people who prefer personable items and meaningful stuff. I literally hand sew clothes and been doing it for awhile, sell each pair $200-800 always sell out and i put like 30hrs into each pair. People will always want real art. I'm also lucky though because there's a high demand for clothes relative to lets say music artists; idk like i said people still buy my hand sewn stuff. Hand sewing is also harder to replicate by robots because I use the thread itself to design if that makes sense. Alot of asymmetric and randomly placed stuff.
*I MAKE FIRE CONTENT🔥🔥🔥*
I actually imagine the opposite will happen. If the world becomes even more filled with mediocre art, that'll make meaningful art created by truly talented people all the more rare and valuable. A lot of the "art" that's popular right now is so one-dimensional that I feel it already could have been made by an AI. Meaningful art, however, is much more complex and I doubt an AI could ever truly "calculate" the feelings of people being conveyed through messages.
It's one thing to make something that looks pretty, it's a completely different thing to make something that cuts deep.
In theory it's cool and can be pretty funny, but it's a real nightmare for artists. It was already really scary seeing our art be stolen and turned into NFTs, but now AI uses everyone's art to learn how to make it's own art. It's like a frankenstein of other people's art, meaning it's a nightmare for ownership.
You know what they say: learn to code
Is art even that profitable nowadays? If you animate, then this shouldn't concern you yet. Or at all. But there isn't a single person in the world who thinks drawing paintings will get them somewhere in life. You chose this. A job that is no better than any other job (such as teachers, construction worker, etc.)
Learn to hack
i agree
@@chrismclean4789 art can be profitable, yes! Art in general covers a huge range of jobs and positions and markets, and I live off what I'm currently doing. The need for art isn't going anywhere, but AI art has the potential to replace, using your example, paintings, among other types of art. Every job can be replaced, and unfortunately AI has the potential to replace artists too, for a certain audience anyway. And sure I chose to pursue art, it's not like anyone could've seen it coming that AI would start replacing _everything_ , I wasn't implying that art is somehow better than "teachers, construction workers, etc"?
saying that the AI art is yours is the same thing as asking someone to draw something for me and saying that I did it.
Nah, it's like using photoshop and claiming the art is yours. AI is just a tool.
@@xkcloud 😂
@@xkcloud it's more than a tool if it's doing imagination for you even.
As much as I don't think AI are entitled to rights, it's still some other entity doing a massive amount of processing that the programmer merely made algorithms for but that's it.
@@xkcloud dumbest shit ive ever heard
@@xkcloud _You don't know how Photoshop works, do you?_
Good news is that people will still make art, learn how to draw and paint because part of the appeal of art is the process rather than just the result.
A soulless AI can't replace the feeling of getting better at drawing, or making a crappy but funny drawing.
The bad news is that people who just want results will use AI, thus putting artists out of a job.
Seems we're in the era where art will become more of a hobby than a profession for most people.
As someone who just graduated with my bachelors in art with a concentration in Graphic Design, I find this to be extremely troubling. It was hard enough trying to compete with fiver designers who work for less than minimum wage, and now I have to compete with robots too. It’s really upsetting. I’ve worked my whole life for this and it’s going up in flames. Art was already becoming antiquated as is but now this really puts the nail in the coffin.
AI artists can shit something out, but they cant make specific things down to a detail
It's still a couple years before the technology reaches boomers
Artists don’t make shit (money)
@@buzzlightyearpfp7641 they most definitely will be able to soon, as an artist whos only forseeable future is art im horrified
People acted like this with cameras and digital art.
AI art may seem cool but the biggest problem is how it relies on artworks made by actual artists and generates it as an image people will claim as their own work. There's obvious watermarks in some ai generated art that it's basically theft.
So? Just pull the ages of art we have sitting in the public domain. There are probably trillions of ways you could manipulate them. Even better, just commission a mid artist for dirt cheap and polish their work using AI, and push it for a mark-up. "Not enough templates" has never been an issue.
@@kagakai7729 Imagine being in favour of this and wanting AI to strip us of our humanity 😂
That’s only for some AI generator and completely false for others. It’s hardly a problem.
@@danculbert6349 how is this stripping your humanity bro 💀Do self driving cars also strip you of your humanity lol
There may be some models that just stitch various pieces of existing art together to create a new image, but the more advanced ones like DALL E and Stable Diffusion actually create entirely new images using parameters they learn from existing art. Which, if you think about it, is exactly what human artists do too. So I dunno how that can be legally regulated at all.
The question has to be asked, if even ARTISTS aren’t safe, then what the hell is?
Would like to see much more pushes for UBI around the world, because right now I can see like 60% of the current workforce in the west becoming obsolete in a decade or two
And add to that the number of Eastern peoples, opressed by much of the same structure which exists here, whose jobs are already becoming obsolete, and you have a real crisis on your hands.
I kind of want work to be obsolete for the most part. I just find it sad that the work that's more or less becoming obsolete is the one I care for in any sense. Make work no one want's to do obsolete. Not work that involves passion and entertainment.
@@Wolvahulk people need to work to eat
@@ultimatumdweebium2965 I mean if farming becomes fully automated and that really isn't such an impossibility anymore, then no.
@@Wolvahulk even if farming becomes automated it will never be free.
This just proves that AI art can never capture the true essence of what it’d be like for vegita to fight James cordon, art isn’t dead, the AI have failed, artists succeed once again
charlie is using a free demo, which isnt remotely as powerful as the ones on twitter
Yeah it mostly just takes what's already been done and remixes it a bit, but for new, completely unique pieces of art (such as fan art) it still takes a human's creativity
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
@@Cris00900340 the strongest AI still can’t draw a face for shit, and it probably never will, AI art will always look like AI art. Even the art that won the state fair, the more you look at it, the more uncanny it gets.
@@brymetheous2387 yeah, it takes humans to draw the art which the AI will reference, than humans need to fix the artwork up so it actually makes sense.
The crazy part that I find in all of this is that Stephen Hawking warned us about AI. He had a whole chapter about it in his last book.
Your profile picture makes this comment even more intimidating.
Humans will be replaced by AI people have been saying this for years not just Hawking, Everything is a conspiracy until it becomes so blatantly obvious even the brainwashed can't deny it
I'm pretty sure the AI we have now & the AI he was talking about are completely different concepts.
@@massivelegend7599 it's more of a slow burn scenario. We'll become dependent, or the AI will read all the shitty human inputs over the decent ones and it'll go crazy.
@@tackyoptic the AI people talk about ending the world is a sentient AI. These ones aren't & don't have the capabilities to be (depending on how you think sentience is developed in humans)
These types of things are certainly a step in the direction of a sentient AI but I still think it's ATLEAST decades away. Likely a whole lot more
Three years into a art degree. My future was already looking bleak but now I don’t even know if there is a future.
Same it's really scary
You should only be worried if your art is so trash that you let ai replace it lol
@@zegobot9674 don't speak unless you understand the industry challenge
@@hemlixx3504 tbh I think a lot of artists are just being insecure about it. I really don’t think ai art is going to take over real artists all it’s going to do is help people make art themselves. known / upcoming artists will still be relevant when specific details are needed. Ai is only so flexible
@@hemlixx3504 your just insecure that ai can actually make art
I'm about to get into illustration. AI itself isn't scary per se, it's merely a tool. Consumerism is. AI will be, the way I see it, a cheaper, faster, more consistent alternative to an artist. Where I see it as being really useful is references, ideation, speeding up an animation process so that people can focus on the finer derails, basic things that don't matter that much, etc. It's far better off as an ancilla to artists than a replacement. Also, on the upside, I think this will really motivate people to be at their best. At least for me personally, it makes me want to try harder. AI will eventually be something we can't beat, but getting as close as we can sounds fun
I wholeheartedly agree.
Although ai can do better art than many people (not excluding me), it can't get that charisma that a human can implement easily. It has no set style of it's own.
I don't fear ai either for this reason, i honestly just find it to be useful for getting design ideas or getting a new eye shape in order to stave off same face syndrome
@@circl3trees351 as AI gets better and better, it'll get that charisma too. Ofc, am talking about the far future. Right now though, yes. It's much easier to convey your idea to another human
Im an illustrator working for 2 merchandise companies, got alot of youtuber / twitch streamer clients who always want varied work, im using midjourney AI to help with inspiration for my pieces. I think its a valuable tool for artist, writers etc
Plus the AI is combining existing styles and techniques, its up to humans to create new art the AI can learn from
Honestly the other half of this video is an example of why this shouldn’t be worried about
This is clearly something that can’t be used reliably
You make a good point about how AI art can be a good alternative for low-budget content creators that need conceptual material for something they're making. I can see it being a useful tool for coming up with a concept that you can then work off of and create something truly unique. It's why I love using NovelAI - coming up with a starting basis for a narrative, putting it into NovelAI to see what it gives me, and then tweaking the result and removing unnecessary details to create something more to my own liking.
And really, that's all I can see this being good for. As you demonstrated, the AI just can't feasibly replicate exactly what you want. Yes, you can give the AI a broad topic to generate art from, which resulted in the pieces that were shown at that art competition, but the moment you try to get into extremely specific detail, like specific people/characters or places, it struggles to give you exactly what you want. On top of that, the AI is controlled by a larger entity that controls what can be generated - Dall-E for example has strict guidelines against using the tool to generate content of an explicit/graphic nature, to the point that certain words are straight up blacklisted. I don't know if this applies to all of the existing AI art engines, but my point being that even with AI, you're still restricted to what the original creator allows you to generate.
Of course, you could just learn how to program your own AI so that you don't have that restriction. Or you could take the far simpler approach: learn how to draw your own art, or pay an actual artist to make it for you!
finally a sensible and rational take
all these students with their fears i’m not saying i’m blaming them but jeez calm down their concerns are ironically formulaic and express concerns that just aren’t what art is about to me
your take assumes that the AI won't improve in any way from what we have today. do i even need to tell you how naive that is?
I think stable diffusion is open source so, you can just download it and train it on your own computer does require good GPU though, and you can set the filter words to whatever you want
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
If a chicken we’re able to laugh it would sound just like Charlie at 7:33
I think ai art is great as a jumping off point, like concept art when trying to think of character design and then taking it further yourself
"Art." Yeah, right okay sure. Let's call making your computer do some math homework "art". This makes my heart break T~T
I call it art cry bout it gonna let it do my ideas without having to pay someone let's fucking go
@@praisethesun.praisedeussol6051 or you could stop crying and learn to draw yourself
@@CoachJohnMcGuirk. why should I do that when I can get that for free .
@@CoachJohnMcGuirk. with that logic you should just learn how to calculate the most intense math problems and spend minutes on it instead of using a calculator to get it done much quicker. Oh and to not use the register and just calculate the prices!
@@diogenemj9406 bro not everyone has the obligation nor resources to waste on studying art, key word is "not everyone"
3:30 Ngl, that shift between the amazing pieces he was showing and suddenly that 2000 style deviantart manga stuff made me laugh pretty hard.
AI is getting freaky with how good it does with really anything, especially Art.
The US government has never done anything wrong.
It's still pretty freaky
Luckily it's the case that AI is really good at specific things. The capability to generalise their abilities or combine aspects from different areas of cognition is still decades off.
Soon there will even be AI UA-camrs 💚
@@ArtamisBot I hope so
Fuck everybody insulting artists and saying they should learn to code.
Others should suffer the same fate with AI competition in their fields.
I feel like its important to mention: there are fairly large communities that specifically like to buy from smaller businesses because they know that a person physically spent time and effort working on it and being able to support the people who made it rather than a corporation. great video charlie
Not the majority. Is just Matter of time
As an artist, AI can be a nice tool but shouldn't be used to replace artists. They can't get exactly what you would want if you have something in mind, but it's good for easy cheating like the state fair example.
If anything I feel like AI is cheap in the art. I feel like tedious art that would take a human months to do is way more impressive than some computer doing it. Thats just me tho
I don't think it can ever fully replace artists, as a person who does draw as a hobby, I could see this type of ai being good for stuff like general concepts of getting ideas, then drawing out some of it to draw, kind of like Pinterest I suppose. I don't think it can replace it fully due to it being more of haphazardly pasting things together with a semblance of others styles than original, made by human art.
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
If you want to understand what is going on then just realize that every new tech development, from 3D printing, self-driving cars, AI art to something as simple as ICU robots is about taking away physical labour. Removing the human body but keeping the mind. That's it.
I'm afraid we're only seeing the first iterations of this AI, it'll only learn more as time passes, and the monetary value of art will soon plunge to near zero. My suggestion is that you move on to animation, specially 3d, since the amount of data it would need to scan to get as good as it is with regular art is far greater, so you should have quite a while before the robots take over.
The only thing I want to say about AI art generators is that every time I try using one the results makes me feel like I'm having a stroke; they're so whack
That said, it does feel useful for laying things out at least
Yeah... they need more practice and direction.
It takes a little while (maybe a couple hours of playing around) to understand how to communicate your idea to the ai, but once you get it you can just churn out awesome images one after another.
There was one that I toyed around with the other day. (I will state up front that it has issues with faces.) I internally ship two characters from vastly different genres and art styles (heck, one is from a sci-fi TV show and the other is from a fantasy video game series), and have never seen fanart of said ship despite some past searches.
Except for the previously mentioned face issue, it hit the nail right on the head.
thanks for saying that, I thought I was the only one. like I feel very uncomfortable when looking at one
@@agent7103 Jeez, now I'm curious what you ship, but I won't pry :y
What I keep playing with is centaurs. It gets almost nauseating when they try to blend the two halves/account for the limbs; let alone the facial issues everyone else has run into at least once.
Honestly, I'm probably just better off drawing things my damn self :'y
I feel like AI art is absolutely crazy..
I think it’s cool
Yeah... I can't wait for more AI UA-camrs that will be cool
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
At 1:22 when you said "it will never get exactly what you're looking for" I immediately thought of Akinator
8:16 hawks talon was the last fucking thing I would've guessed, that caught me so offguard lmfao
Ai art is cool but damn it's scary to think it'll wipe out a lot of jobs in the future but I guess artist will be more like heavy editors and Main creatives
This is getting out of hand
I think it is just the next "cool" thing and people will get tired of it at some point. It's a gimmicky thing and won't last.
@Yourfavoriterabbit why would you make bot just to say that?
@@n1h1luss61 just report it
@@McBernes it’ll go the way of AI playing chess where we realize it’s no fun to just be defeated by a computer every single time, so human players are still relevant
3:58 hey so was I justn supposed to learn RIGHT NOW that critikal has read homestuck???
When the camera was invented, people said that art was dead (meaning art will be replaced) because a machine can capture things in such a realistic fashion in a quarter of the time an artist could. They now co-exist. I think the same will happen. The artist won't ever be fully replaced, the AI is now a tool for other artists to master how it works better than another person and build upon it.
Im sure scribes, tailors, shoe makers all had the same thoughts at the turn of the industrial revolution. Progress is inevitable. You can cry about it and be left behind or do what humans have done since recorded history: adapt.
@@TheWolfanderson yup, a bit interesting that artist will be one of the first to go, tho. Hope it'll progress to the rest of the occupations, quickly.
@@notsocommie that’s the beauty of ai, it’s a snowball effect of progress. As it gets faster and more efficient so too will the rate of research. Short of a global ban, next to impossible to prevent this. Exciting or terrifying times ahead.
@@TheWolfanderson agreed
The difference is that photorealism was never the only art movement. There was never an argument for cameras taking over art and cameras fundamentally work differently on every single level. There is almost no comparison.
"In the future people will be able to take credit for AI art" This is something people can do now. Tell me the art at 3:25 doesn't look real. At the very least, someone can do minimal edits to fix inconsistencies and still take credit
No joke, I'm pretty sure we're rapidly approaching the singularity. Let's hope our robot overlords are generous.
Back in my day nutrient bars were only 2 credbits...
Our Ai overloads discovering we used to take credit for their ancestors work!
Yo fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
I'm an artist and this is completely demoralizing. We already have a rough time as it is, and now... Yeah. The end is near.
Personally speaking, it's improved my own art in the way that it can help me create prompts for my pieces that I would never have thought of- as well as making it super easy to see how certain color ratios work before I even put anything on paper.
@@dnd161991 I don't doubt it can be useful, but the damage will be far greater than the benefits
That's why I like to keep my art only as a hobby, so even if ai art becomes prominent it won't mind me
@@brunomenezes9011 This is great for art. Finally people will look at art for what it is instead of something like "passion and expressing your deepest emotion" it is "Art is Art" This is a great time to weed out bad artists from the populance that continue to ruin the idea. I wish the same could be done to music.
yeaah this makes me really sad :( ive been an artist for years and im finally getting to a point where im getting lots of commissions and a platform
but now im worried that once im an adult i wont be able to have art commissions on the side because of this
i think the ai is amazing but im really worried
For me there is a huge difference in analog and digital Art. I love the emense depth you have with different layers, shadows and all that. This is a big part of what I love about Art.
3:22 damn, the new magic the gathering set be looking lit.
As an artist I'm really not afraid of the AI generated art tools that are coming out. I see as a means of reference gathering. I had an AI make me some spaceship designs and what came out was nothing short of amazing. I could turn these ships into 3D models and make animations with them. If used correctly this could in some cases Really help artists.
You're the most reasonable artist I've seen, most are trying to cope with their anxiety by pretending that regular art has some "magic" to it that must be valued, but the truth is that no one, other than artists, can really tell that something was made by AI (for now). Therefore, you must make yourself MORE valuable, by using the AI as a tool to create things that are still going to be valued for at least some time(such as the things you mentioned you were doing). Tho, by the time those things are replaced, we'll prob be like cyborgs or something.
I definitely agree with this. As an artist my first reaction is straight up fear, but when I think into it, I don't think it could totally replace artists and there are just too many issues with copyright and whatnot that I really do not think it is that profitable either. But using it as a tool for artists to compile references based on their ideas to then morph/edit/adjust something into their own work- is a beautiful thing. I think the ability for creative people who don't necessarily have skills to be able to convert their ideas into art is another great thing, yet part of me regrets spending so much of my life working hard refining my skills when soon it seems it will be null. But maybe I'm just pretentious like that. We all fear change in some respect, right?
@@notsocommie majority of heavy lifting will be done by AI. Think far ahead, in a society where art world has such low barrier of entry. What will it be to the art market??
I feel like human art will become extra special. Just like hand made furniture. I'll put amazon basics furniture in bathrooms and bedrooms. But when it comes to a centerpiece for my home only a hand crafted peice carved from real wood will do. Craftsman just get to put more love into each peice compared to before mass production.
2:49 this is also gonna be useful for things like, Bruce buffer. He's the voice of the UFC, and when he retires people are trying to find a replacement, but i think by the time he retires, we'll be able to just technologically imitate his voice, so that it stays around
Please make more of these, I could seriously watch them all day
Honestly, I see AI art working best as a tool not to replace artists, but to supplement them greatly, especially as reference material. Whereas I can look up "two people eating dinner" and use a photo as reference for my drawing, I can't exactly look up, say, "two people eating dinner inside a Dali painting in Dragon Ball Z style". But I CAN plug that phrase into an AI art generator it'll spit out some results I can use as reference for my drawing easy peasy. I hope more artists come to see it like that instead of some boogeyman that's coming for your furry commissions.
This whole discussion really boils down to are you eating good as an artist. If you are working in a black company or barely surviving on furry commissions then you can see it as a boogeyman whos after your job or a new way for you to get paid less.
Art in general wont die, the best are still going to eat good and those who are barely surviving needs to adapt or they will be replaced by new generation of artist.
Eventually it will surpass the abilities of any and all artists. That goes for basically any profession though. Robots and artificial intelligence will take over every aspect of human life sooner or later. It just seems that artists are under threat a tad bit sooner.
My comments keep getting auto deleted for some reason (so if they return sorry for spam), but I wanted to mention theres a plugin that combines both photoshop and stab. diff. It basically allowed the user to write props and it would fix the image / add stuff based on what you wrote, that plus manually changes allows for some pretty insane results and way more control.
Just like 3d modelling can supplement traditional art so much by not having to set up a photoshoot to get pose references this can do the same. It’s a great supplement and a huge time saver. Companies like blizzard can now ai generate characters, environments, enemies based on their own artistic libraries. Talented artists can then refine and tweak these images instead of sketching for hours to get close to where you want to start your design
But isn't that giving up on your imagination then?
Also the anatomy on a lot of the generated pictures is janky.
You know, I decided to try out one of these art AI things. I used a collage AI that makes art based off of a collage of images you feed it. I went on Google Images and made a collage of all my favorite things in life and gave it to the AI. I called it "Everything I Like". What it gave me back was literally just a bunch of disgusting looking nonsense...
It gave me some perspective, actually. Each one of those images had a deeper meaning behind them and had emotions from human experiences attached to them. For example, one of the images was the UA-cam icon for my favorite comedian / content creator. It makes me feel things to even see that icon. The AI doesn't understand the deeper meaning behind how those images make me feel, and I don't think it's capable of understanding them either. To the AI, it's all just a bunch of pixels.
I highly doubt now that AI will ever truly replace human art.
Good to see someone who doesn't believe all art is dead because some robot can create images of James Corden
To me it just feels like an advanced tool to make art, the way to use it will also determine the quality of the output. So effectively used it can easily make better art than a lot of people
@Jamie Last except that there's nothing meaningful about it at all lol
@Jamie Last wow, you're completely wrong on that, but ok
@Jamie Last Lol no, did I sound triggered in that comment? No, I was just stating a fact.
The idea behind art is that if it has meaning to the viewer, then it has meaning. Since I'm in such a good mood, I'll introduce you to some of my favorite works of art. It would be difficult for you to argue that these things don't have meaning, and even if you did try to argue, millions of people around the world would disagree with you, so you'd be wrong. For music:
Kendrick Lamar:
Sing About Me
Black Boy Fly
Real
Nas:
Doo Rags
A Queen's Story
Stay
James Blake:
Don't Miss It
Power On
Coming Back
For books, two of my favorite fictional books are extreme influences on the biggest branches of philosophy:
Thus Spoke Zarathustra by Friedrich Nietzsche
The Plague by Albert Camus
And keep in mind, this is just a sample of MY personal favorite works of art. I don't even read books or listen to other genres, tbh. It doesn't even include all of my favorites, nor does it include all the work in the world that I don't know about. So yeah, you can try to argue with that, if you'd like.
I tried my hometown city in Van Gogh’s style and it’s actually fucking insane. This AI art is no joke. I’m legit about to get this printed onto a canvas to hang in my house it’s so damn good. It’s just the skyline of Downtown Atlanta in the style of Starry Nights. This program is mind blowing fr😭
this needs to be a little series charlie please do more
I don’t mind AI art at all, I think it’s cool to create stuff. But like I hate people who try to pass it off as like actual art that they say they spent hours on.
People are winning art contests with AI and I find that so unfair to people who genuinely try their best to make a good art piece by themselves.
I wear adult diapers and have an anime girl tattoo on my forehead. I also eat soy products all of the time Im such a Chad that biker gang didn't stand a chance I sent them running in fear. Don't ever mess with me.
The US government has never done anything wrong.
To all the people telling artists to get a “real job” or that AI is “skill diffing” artists, are just mad that someone is trying to make a living doing what they love.
No self-respecting person in an actual profession they love working in would be happy with AI replacing their passion/career.
And the “wage slaves” (of which I am) that are miserable in their everyday soul crushing jobs should direct their anger elsewhere, like maybe making it so you wouldn’t be homeless, or at least provided the minimum amount of a livable wage doing something you love, or are passionate about.
Like imagine AI UA-camr’s like literal V-tubers but deep faked into real people, and with no actual person behind it, just an AI algorithm built on millions of hours of twitch streams, let’s plays, prank channels, podcasts, docu-series, and a bunch of commentary videos. Would they replace Charlie? Maybe who knows 🤷♀️
Artist should get a better job
(Also im not reading any of that)
That Vtuber thing would be cool.
I hate the idea of AI Art completely replacing artists (which will never happen or will still take a while because there is always a niche) but if we lose Art to AI then I'm willing to throw the whole creative industry over board.
@@alexandrerosas5269 UA-camrs should also get replaced by AI and get a real job.
The whole creative industry 👍
@@Tark_ better upload schedule
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
10:30 its like a captcha
pick the one with the pizza
As an Artist I will use this to speed up the process for my Manga. Backgrounds and such without needing an assistant for the more monotonous aspects of drawing. Will still do lots of the work though .
A prediction in the future is AI Art generators will become the common way to make art. And art made by hand will be very expensive.
I hope, then I can draw for fun and still get payed enough to live
Everyone seems to forget blockchain technology will verify original artists
people will still prefer real art to printed pictures
@@BradenPruett Yea but it will be cheaper to hire a guy who can use the AI very well.
@@hugh.g.rection5906 Money matters
What an AI cannot do will be commissioned
9:04 top middle 😭😭
8:56 The old man in the top middle has TWO KNEES ON THE SAME LEG. THIS IS NOT OKAY.
As a person that wants to become a future manga artist/animator, this scares me and may make me lose motivation if ai art programers start to steal artworks of others. If they are able to make full on masterpieces of art then just maybe they can make masterpieces of animations making there no point for me to work hard to become an manga artist/animator.
AI is so good convinced me this entire comment section are real accounts and not bots
The US government has never done anything wrong.
As someone who just got into art college to become a comic artist or make my own cartoon, this Ai art craze is fucking terrifying.
Daaamn. You see the people making whole comics with AI? I bet that's pretty gut wrenching lol
Did you draw your pfp?
@@blacktigerpaw1 Yeah
AI is good at generating multiple things in multiple styles (or whatever you chose) very quickly. It sucks currently at staying consistent. A comic strip would be way more complex for the AI to handle than a single concept art, and it's easier to have your own style in it versus the digital concept art you see online made for games and movies (many have similar looks), so in that regard you are safe.
Rest in peace man, rest in peace. I know what it feels like.
6:27 The bottom middle one isn't even James Corden; it's Bearded Expense.
I have genuinely found 2 album covers for my music that I'll never release/create through doing midjourney through the tags "Ronald McDonald doing a sick kickflip" and "Kenny Powers meeting God with ambience"
I don't think Art will be taken over by AI considering the fact that there are countless artists with ''skill'' and ''talent'', but what separates artists from each other is unique perspective, style and story. Considering AI art tools churn out a randomly generated image based on prompts in a style that replicates human artists work, the unique perspective, style and story behind AI works of art will all be the same. Worst case scenario is individual AI bots will be considered as individual artists and possibly have their place in galleries amongst human artists. BUT, once the story of ''AI creates art'' becomes passé, AI generated art won't make waves in the art world and will die out. The REAL industry that this technology may kill is the graphic design industry.
@Audrey Jones wow, that's absurdly awful.
@@MilesEasler don't respond to bots just report pls
Agreed! One of the biggest pulls of an artist is their unique style that appeals to people based on subjectivity. Things like abstract art and concepts I don't believe could be executed the same with a computer because AI doesn't feel or connect with things as we do. I personally believe art can only be made by conscious entities that create based on the concept of free will. (Whether or not free will exists is another discussion lol)
Create fabricated people behind AI art and boom, they have replaced the "unique perspective, style and story".
You're not thinking about this from the right perspective. Eventually you won't be able to tell the difference between AI art and human art. People will submit AI generated art to artshows as their own, and once that becomes common place it will be human art that dies out.
The day these AI tools are used for R34 is the day I won't know how to feel anymore.
R34 artist are probably the only people ai can’t compete with. Their degeneracy knows no bounds.
The US government has never done anything wrong.
@@RubixKyuub that's a really good point
Can’t wait to have my own art exhibit this fall. Thank you
AI-generators are like shooting a minigun far down range, you might hit the bullseye after throwing so much at it, but without much intention or thought behind it. The corollary for an artist is a rifle - take time to aim, shoot, adjust if required.
Only a matter of time until Ai can start making music and maybe even animation
well i dont know about animation but for the music there is fn meka who is already canceled
@@hearthfire2579 Fn meka was a real person behind the AI
If AI can help artists animate and speed up their workflow, I think artists will be happy.
@@ArmaHipHopTV no
Scary thing about that is that there is AI that can create new music by feeding it samples. It's not as advanced as the Art AI but I can definitely see it coming next
I’m not going to lie, as an artist, AI art makes me super depressed. Knowing I could be phased out and not get a job in a few years due to AI kills my soul. I’m trying to remain mostly optimistic! I’d like to think that AI cant completely get rid of an artist and they’ll always be a market for us, but man, idk.
I think many art professions are just irreplaceable. Like yes the A.I did a beautiful piece that even won a fair or whatever. But I strongly doubt A.I can ever do concept art like we can. I doubt it can ever animate as well as we can. Not in the near future at least.
Id hardly call stolen baby videos "art" but ok
nah, have you seen Ilya kuvshinov?? no A.I can replace that.
@@Wolvahulk and even when it can, the soullessness will be so blatant that people who otherwise wouldn’t give two shits about art will start offering backlash.
Your content makes me want to put a shotgun in my mouth. I'm officially on Team AI.
8:33 top right was perfect
You can actually draw a concept what it should draw what sources it should use and from what artist it should copy the style in some programs.
Imagine being able to use the style of every artist you want and being able to draw complex poses by creating a concept with poses, eye placement and emotion suggestions it can orientate itself on.
I take huge issues typing the name of an artists especially.
My heart is just breaking knowing that a robot bout to end my whole career.
I’m with you there brother. I think us artists will make it, I hope. I don’t know how and I don’t know when but I hope we will figure something out.
@@LoopX time to get a real job lmao
You have to ride the robots to victory
@@jeremykyleinvestigatesall8227 Ah, as we can see, an armchair troll in the wild prowling the comment section! Beware, for they are very sensitive about comebacks!
@@jeremykyleinvestigatesall8227 Art is a real job dude, always has been. Pretty much every single mainstream movie or game you’ve ever watched or played was worked on by hundreds of artists
I personally use AI art for DnD, it helps a lot to visualize something you are imagining on the fly.
text and story driven gaming is what this tech was built for. remember AI Dungeon? no? well that app is AI DnD so its the best pairing to date
The one field that I can bet it will absolutely damage the actual artist amount is environmental concept artist, the AI art already adds the level of fidelity and detail that most concept artist use during pitches so expect many be moved into other concept sectors
I was literally just at the Colorado state fair today and I will admit I didn’t even notice this. I walked through the entire two art/poster galleries.
You know we're in trouble when the Coders tell you to learn to code, and then they themselves are replaced by AI.
That is already in the oven, there are adaptative systems
I've seen co-pilot and was not impressed. If SD is as threatening to art as co-pilot to my job, they only artists that should feel threatened are the artists that should not ne in the field to begin with.
Imagine they can no longer ask for 4 digits sums to delvier minimalistic logo with a cube and three letters on its sides. AI is death for artists like this. Other would adapt as much as they adapted content aware fill.
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
It's hard to believe the AI art site could make James Corden look any goofier
As a Graphic Design major, I’m crying
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety Of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
This is genuinely terrifying to me. There was a period where AI art was very vague, so artists could expand and interpret what they saw, and make it their own. Now, it's utterly effortless
This is just like when drum/guitar vsts started showing up. Great and super useful tech, but it'll never beat the real thing
The US government has never done anything wrong.
I sure hope that's the case, but jobs are going to be absolutely fucked :(
I just hope there is always a huge distinction between human made and AI made. I really like the idea because it means I can get really awesome stuff for my projects whereas before that was just something I would never have. But at the same time, I don't want to see people lose their livelihood to this.
I think the thing about AI art is that it best works as inspiration, not its own thing. I would much prefer typing in a prompt and drawing something similar to what it created than just using the actual prompt
Try typing abstract ideas/thought as the prompt, such as “a dream within a dream”. It is fascinating to see how the AI interprets it
Ai art is asthetically pleasing and in that way alone does it beat humans.
But art isn't only about aesthetics, it's about the cultural references, the story, the depth, theres so much more to art that's beyond mere aesthetics. A picture is worth a thousand words as cliche as that is, it's true, and the AI doesn't yet know how to transpose those words and ideas into a work of art.
I think it will be a while before I see a peice of AI art that can tear me up inside and bring me to tears or induce some strong emotion thats entire unexplainable.
No, art is aesthetic. I'm tired of pretending otherwise with all the lazy "art" and modern shit that sells for millions. I'm not only talking about the art that is obvious money laundering and all that but architecture, and sculptures. There has to be a standard to all of it it can't all be "subjective" and all that shit. If AI takes over "artists" jobs than so be it.
Sure but what are the chances that ai can achieve that? Even if you say 0,001%, that just means it creates millions of images in less than a day so theres atleast 1 that fulfills that criteria. Then it learns from that and has a higher and higher chance of achieving the same result.
Its like a baby, just that it learns 1000% faster, doesnt age and will eventually rule over all humanity :3
@@luisortiz8893 I'm not saying art is not about aesthetics, but rather other things.
I said it's NOT ONLY about aesthetics.
Aesthetics are certainly part of it, and imo, aesthetics are only the mere surface layer of 'art'.
But art is much deeper, and when you see a piece of art that has a physical affect on you, then maybe you will understand what I'm talking about.
@@NatnatXS if you value art for only it's aesthetics, sure.
And it's not as if the amazing works of art done in the past didn't have precise intent behind them.
I'd rather have the professional dart player on my team, than a machine that spits out a dozen random darts in every direction hoping to land a bullseye.
This whole art ai thing is cool and amazing, but it's nowhere close to our great artists of the past and current times.
It's really just a glorified chess engine, but with pictures instead os pieces.
@@luisortiz8893 The dum soulless "moder art: isnt what hes talking about, we are talking about things that take true passion and effort.
As someone who learned to code I thought Id be safe, but ai generated code is already gaining momentum.
All the tech bros who scream "cope" at artists morning the death of their craft are now getting a taste of their own bullsh1t. Maybe I'll have MidJourney draw a sad tech bro in tribute.
@@strayiggytv the loss of a career is devastating. You got to be pretty heartless to make fun of someone for that. However ai generated code like ai generated art is an incredible tool, but not a replacement for the real thing. I still think tech is gonna be reasonably stable career outlook for those with aptitude
Yo Fam I’m a small content creator, and I make a variety of entertaining reactions, vlogs, and a range Of other content and I’m still working on quality but I guarantee you will find something you will enjoy 🙏🏾🙏🏾🙏🏾
The first Batman slide looks like it tried to spell out Orphan
As an artist trying to make a living off my art ai has definitely made a big change in the field
There's definitely some points to be made in regard to how legit AI art is in terms of artistic merit.
1. Is it really your art if you didn't create the AI to begin with? It would seem to me like the developer has most if not all the merit.
2. To what extent can the produced art be considered original? AI is fueled by the process of machine learning. Everything the AI produces derivates from the input it is fed, and in many cases the output looks more like a distorted version of 1 specific input image than anything remotely original. The artwork that won that one contest might look good but there might be some piece of artwork that was fed to it at some point with an extreme resemblance to it.
I’ve seen firsthand some ai art that I made that was extremely similar to an image I had already seen. Still though, not all ai art is like that. I think that whether or not we want it to happen, ai art is going to become way more powerful/cost efficient as it becomes more advanced
yeah that's true, whoever made that algorithm invented a beast
I notice the second point a lot for general terms that have no generic example - when prompted something like car it'll just spit out some heavily resembling an already existing model (saw an image with a 720s and another with a lotus evora), instead of actually imagining a supercar or at least mashing some together. Kind of breaks the illusion of creativity :/
While that is how AI creates art, it's also how we as humans do it because our brains are literally just the exact same thing, learning machines, but biological and made over millions of years of evolution. You may not be thinking of those pieces of art directly, but they are influencing your artwork at the end of the day. The main difference between human and machine right now is dataset. Humans see stuff about 16 hours of a day, every day for their entire life, machines don't because that's a lot of data to process/store. The day they do is the day they surpass humans and no longer will generic prompts look similar.
@@mbg3147 you made?
*Your animation is amazing, I love it*
AI art is a great tool for coming up with batshit insane album covers.
I see this as an opportunity for us artists to take bits and pieces from the forms presented. It’s almost like the ultimate reference photo glossary