Comparison: 2018 Toyota Rush vs Honda BRV Walkaround Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 267

  • @adamja4924
    @adamja4924 5 років тому +24

    1. Brv has better fuel economy and more power(acceleration) compared to rush
    2. rush has better safety features

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому

      More power only when you reach 6,000 rpm

    • @docbadzvlogs2103
      @docbadzvlogs2103 5 років тому

      I am for safety measures 😂

    • @TheLance1391
      @TheLance1391 5 років тому +3

      They both have 5 stars adult NCAP safety passes. Just that Hondas engine is pwoerful

  • @shyamkv4797
    @shyamkv4797 5 років тому +10

    BRV is my favourite car I love it.. great handling pleasure, stability and fun to drive I love it..

    • @Rudscarlyn
      @Rudscarlyn 4 роки тому

      Nice. How about the maintenance cost.

    • @organicagri4299
      @organicagri4299 4 роки тому

      @@Rudscarlyn it's a Honda not a range rover

    • @mrchristmh2
      @mrchristmh2 3 роки тому

      Maintenance for My Brv i consider cheap and honda SC takes good care of my car

  • @vitoaditya8337
    @vitoaditya8337 5 років тому +17

    I think when the Rush made its first appearance in Indonesia, we were all happy because all the trims have 6 Airbags and VSC. But look at this, we immediately get jealous because you guys have Blind Spot Monitor and Pre Collision System (which I think borrows the same system with the Myvi, since both cars are manufactured in the same factory and they share some components).

    • @limboonhong64
      @limboonhong64 5 років тому +1

      In Malaysia Myvi ASA only operate at below 30km/h. In the Rush Toyota made the PCW and PCB work at 4km/h - 80km/h. Actually this is upgrade system from Myvi and more better than what in Myvi. However in Myvi facelift maybe can get what in the Rush for the updated active safety features.

    • @aquaboy1650
      @aquaboy1650 5 років тому +1

      But Malaysian Rush is IDR 95 mil / RM 27000 more expensive than top spec Indonesian Rush.

    • @Zianrhn
      @Zianrhn 5 років тому +1

      Yeah I'm also from Indonesia and I'm a little bit sad cause of the little downgrade

  • @yazzernarcisomolinadomingo894
    @yazzernarcisomolinadomingo894 5 років тому +12

    You've missed a lot on the BR-V bro...

  • @norbertogadja6775
    @norbertogadja6775 5 років тому +10

    Try sitting at the 3rd row so you can say what car has the better leg room. biased toyota review

  • @acsgdo02
    @acsgdo02 5 років тому +4

    in the Philippines majority of buyers are more keen on engine performance here when you ask if they like the Toyota Rush the usual answer you will hear is underpowered were not happy seeing 3000+ RPMS on a 100 kph reading in the highway the reason it is being outsold by the expander

  • @etelectricworld
    @etelectricworld 5 років тому +8

    Very biased view.
    Try driving both....and for sure u will like BRV for its speed, acceleration, and comfy suspension. No fight. Btw...new seats now are more ergonomics....slimmer but comfy. The old ones are thick, ugly & old fashioned...look at Ferrari & Porsche (seats are sleek and sporty).

  • @anandsebastian
    @anandsebastian 5 років тому +2

    Lower ride height also makes the vehicle more stable in taking corners because of the lower centre of gravity plus pregnant women and women with babies have an easier time getting in and out of the car.

    • @Rudscarlyn
      @Rudscarlyn 4 роки тому

      Yes but with higher ground clearance you have confidence in shallow water.

  • @pinaylp4174
    @pinaylp4174 5 років тому

    is the toyota rush powerful enough for the mountains of bukidnon ? Also, does it have reverse display camera?

  • @franka6790
    @franka6790 4 роки тому +1

    The roof rail on brv is not flimsy. Its flexible which is a good thing in terms of Durability

  • @ejdaddy3161
    @ejdaddy3161 4 роки тому +2

    I'm new to cvt tech, and im pretty scared of the technology background..id rather choose traditional automatic than cvt..

  • @mrchristmh2
    @mrchristmh2 5 років тому +6

    The Rush was build to make BRV looks like a old car, more gadgets and flare,... but it missed out 1 thing that is important for a buyer nowadays: Fuel consumption, BRV light and simple, RUsh Big and Heavy,, and hold on,, BRV is not an SUV its a crossover.. pls get the facts right.

  • @kanopikanvaspemborongklang3511
    @kanopikanvaspemborongklang3511 5 років тому +1

    Rear wheel drive for Rush is not giving good fuel economy as it needs to transfer the power from front engine to rear axle tyres by long shaft, the power loss here during power transferring. Thats why when cruising 100km/hr, rear wheel driven car will have 2800-3000 of rpm.

  • @SHAHRULAZ
    @SHAHRULAZ 5 років тому +53

    Personal choice. I prefer a Honda over a Toyota ✌

    • @miratangtangit
      @miratangtangit 5 років тому +3

      Im with you bro. 😁

    • @brucelee-kd8yb
      @brucelee-kd8yb 5 років тому +2

      U r right bro! I'm vios owner just about 2 year old.already enter workshop for 4 times (2 times towing)poor reliability.

    • @tommyshelby6114
      @tommyshelby6114 5 років тому +6

      Brv u get better engine n fuel efficiency. Rush u get...nice looks. Cheers

    • @angelasoibin6043
      @angelasoibin6043 5 років тому

      I agreed with you

    • @grandmastersemos84
      @grandmastersemos84 5 років тому +3

      Honda’s very good engines.. xspeacially older models, well made, but their new cvt transmission hv to consider where I heard some problems.

  • @SA-xt1ts
    @SA-xt1ts 4 роки тому

    By sitting inside the rush do you feel that its more higher compared to BRV?

  • @kennethchongweithart7905
    @kennethchongweithart7905 5 років тому +5

    Why can't Toyota have headrest for the middle seat? Please tell Toyota to reconsider the headrest for middle seat pax in the 2nd row.

  • @RickyMasterChiefLaw
    @RickyMasterChiefLaw 5 років тому +2

    nice that's what we call competition! good for consumers

  • @everythingvlog533
    @everythingvlog533 5 років тому +2

    Rush has daihatsu engine. Yet a well-known Japanese car manufacturer. Though adapted by Toyota

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому

      This engine is similar with the avanza/xenia. High revving engine and not fuel efficient.

  • @ShabinShaji493
    @ShabinShaji493 5 років тому +9

    While you ride the both, feel the difference between Brv and rush.
    Honda engine is very reliable and powerfull. And compare the price too. At that price of rush I will buy innova crysta or Mahindra XUV.
    Rush is Re-engineering from Honda brv. And Brv side look is not good but it handles well.

    • @saifuddinudin1748
      @saifuddinudin1748 5 років тому +1

      also honda is more fuel economy then toyota but both cars I like.
      I have a proton wira 1.3 m.t fuel injection compare with my old version honda crv 2.0cc a.t.but my crv far fuel economy then my wira.I don't know why..confusing why

    • @tommyshelby6114
      @tommyshelby6114 5 років тому

      @@saifuddinudin1748 same. I got wira fuel injection 1.5 & honda civic ek3 engine converted to b20b which is 2.0. still my civic more fuel economy.

    • @rr5008
      @rr5008 5 років тому

      You have Rush in India? Because I don't remember Toyota sell it, in India.

  • @pgnazi
    @pgnazi 5 років тому +2

    I like new rush design more. Proper suv-mpv? Only if its wider by 50mm. Now its 1695mm same like old rush. Dont know space inside. Maybe bobby can judge for us is it same size shoulder to shoulder compare to brv 1735mm if not mistake. Nice comparison

  • @mampirmerene4192
    @mampirmerene4192 4 роки тому

    I dont care what people said about brv, the most important thing is power, acceleration and stability..that's all..it's really satisfying especially on highway..I drove aruz but dont know why, brv still the choice, fun to drive..

  • @ngyc6294
    @ngyc6294 5 років тому +2

    Cant wait for the drive comparison, as one big surprise I had from the BR-V was how the suspension and chassis was tuned to handle bumps and sudden lane changes.

  • @kanopikanvaspemborongklang3511
    @kanopikanvaspemborongklang3511 5 років тому

    Also when you driving a rear wheel drive car, needs more maintenance for extra i.e oil rear axle, shaft bearing check and inspection and many more. Thats why Rush is coupled with 4 AT speed gearbox.

  • @zenyu94
    @zenyu94 5 років тому +6

    why buy the rush when it's pretty much confirmed perodua will release their own version sooner or later at a much cheaper price?

    • @iqhwanhanapi275
      @iqhwanhanapi275 5 років тому

      U mean next gen of nautica? Good thinking of u

    • @brandonczw
      @brandonczw 5 років тому

      Not so soon... earliest also by 2020

    • @shafiqshahar1456
      @shafiqshahar1456 5 років тому

      Perodua rush? Lok u think toyota gonna let perodua kill their product ka..not goona happen

    • @saifuddinudin1748
      @saifuddinudin1748 5 років тому

      shafiq shahar ,produa is under toyota brand ma.

    • @saifuddinudin1748
      @saifuddinudin1748 5 років тому

      shafiq shahar ,produa is under toyota brand ma.

  • @cholobenipayo4575
    @cholobenipayo4575 5 років тому +16

    Clearly, Toyota has studied the BR-V, and developed the PROs from the CONs of the BR-V. A big improvement of the Rush from it's first generation. Thanks to Honda. Unfair comparison, I think. Well, that's just me saying. PEACE!

    • @grandmastersemos84
      @grandmastersemos84 5 років тому

      It’s the 2nd generation already I believed. Previous model same as Daihatsu Terios

    • @angelasoibin6043
      @angelasoibin6043 5 років тому

      Yes its true,i totally agreed

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому

      You mean this is already a 2nd gen rush???

    • @Kyle-kc8cw
      @Kyle-kc8cw 5 років тому

      So they completely built-up a vehicle in a year, by copying BRV? You've got to realize that doesn't make sense. This is not the first Rush. Maybe you've all forgotten, there was a previous Rush. Look at Avanza which comes very close to being a twin of Rush. Also boasting a high ground clearance, rear wheel drive, 7-seater. That is older than the BRV mind you.

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому

      @@Kyle-kc8cw the avanza is the daihatsu xenia while the rush is the daihatsu terios. Same family but still a different model.

  • @best89my
    @best89my 5 років тому +3

    how about the leg room at the 3rd row?is it spacious like brv too?or more?

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому

      Third row seat space is meant for the kids and even for pets.

  • @dm3design
    @dm3design 5 років тому

    How about Rush engine, does it feels like "dragging"?

  • @pijesz
    @pijesz 5 років тому +2

    It's just an mpv with higher ground clearance. How to have the Sport in 'SUV' with small engine and the heavy body.

  • @superhigh9763
    @superhigh9763 5 років тому +6

    The one does the review seems bias.

  • @syakirzulfahry6274
    @syakirzulfahry6274 5 років тому +1

    For my Opinion.. i prefer Toyota Rush For Safety, Larger space for a big family, many Kind built for family.. For speed yes More To BRV.. But Why must driving too Fast If you Choose Car For Family? Is it Comfort for Racing!! Rush is build for Family Members.. who Want Feel Like an SUV!! Rush Is Strong enough for Malaysia Mountain!!

    • @khairul0112
      @khairul0112 5 років тому

      Not too fast, standard cut off at 163kmj for brv, its just family car and fit the objective. But while drive at uphill with full passenger, it fulfil the job..😎

    • @not5available
      @not5available 5 років тому

      I think for better price, Aruz is the answer

  • @KhairunAmalinaIdris
    @KhairunAmalinaIdris 5 років тому

    Bobby, i would really appreciate if you guys check and compare in term of the CRS in every car, especially something to call family car. Thanks.

  • @Kajenoel
    @Kajenoel 5 років тому

    Which is the costlier of the two?????

  • @CARWMK
    @CARWMK 5 років тому

    Bobby will toyota voxy be launching in mesia ?

  • @thebranndoful
    @thebranndoful 4 роки тому +1

    I just purchased a Rush, and it was a pretty simple choice for me. All I care about is reliability, durability, and safety.
    One of the biggest complaints about the Rush is the main reason I purchased it: engine and powertrain. The Rush engine is battle-tested and has been around for a while which means you get rock-solid reliability that should give you many, many years problem-free, and you should be able to rack up 200K fairly easily. The transmission is only a 4 speed, and if you would be driving a lot on the highway this maybe wouldn't be the best choice as RPM's hit around 3000 at highway speed; however, I will only be driving this in the city, or on some country roads (no highway driving). At those speeds the gearing and torque are perfect, and the rear-wheel-drive offers good acceleration.
    That being said, I am, so so relieved that this is a traditional auto, even though Toyota and Honda make 'better" CVT's than most, I, personally, do not trust this technology, yet. There are so many people who may even like their CVT, but they just are not yet as reliable as a traditional auto - that can't be refuted. All I care about is that the vehicle lasts a long time.
    Safety, body-on-frame construction, and clearance are added bonuses.

  • @hithummah
    @hithummah 5 років тому +2

    for a 7 seaters mini van with a small engine
    RWD > FWD
    Therefore the Rush all the way

  • @johnlee2540
    @johnlee2540 5 років тому

    Both good , urban brv , sub urban aruZ , if often go sub urban non Highway , check aruz actual city fuel consumption too

  • @snowii2020
    @snowii2020 5 років тому +1

    so does that mean this is just a jacked up, extra safety system and extra 2 seats 2018 myvi?

    • @BobbyAngmalaysia
      @BobbyAngmalaysia  5 років тому +1

      Every car is also a quieter/faster/longer/shorter/slower/more safety/less safety/ from other cars also mar ....

  • @haniefnoor403
    @haniefnoor403 5 років тому +5

    it depends on the price tag, i have a brv and it drives good and handles very good, for me i would buy the new innova than the rush bcoz well the price between both toyota's almost close, if im not mistaken la hehe

    • @BobbyAngmalaysia
      @BobbyAngmalaysia  5 років тому

      Very true.

    • @limboonhong64
      @limboonhong64 5 років тому

      If Innova u take G spec then will around RM20k expensive than this car. But also the car more premium and better performance

    • @grandmastersemos84
      @grandmastersemos84 5 років тому

      Price almost close? Really? 2.5L?

    • @haniefnoor403
      @haniefnoor403 5 років тому

      Grand master Semos its 1.5l not 2.5l,

    • @grandmastersemos84
      @grandmastersemos84 5 років тому

      I mean Innova is 2.5L and Rush 1.5L but the price between the two car very close?

  • @bobbyleo265
    @bobbyleo265 5 років тому

    Gua pake brv yg dulu merk honda jg tp klo ada rush yg mau jual gua mau beli asal haraga nya separoh gimana mas hehhe....tp kedua nya sama2 ban 4 kok

  • @libralcl
    @libralcl 5 років тому

    Hi Bobby, any chance to get the KIA Stinger to review?

  • @realVicTorres02
    @realVicTorres02 5 років тому +2

    Sadly in the Philippines, we don't have these kind of techs you have in the Malaysian-spec Rush. Hopefully it could come to the Philippine-spec Rush soon.

  • @rhorlandas
    @rhorlandas 5 років тому +3

    i like the toyota rush its a more SUV kind of thing

  • @dennismabelin1223
    @dennismabelin1223 5 років тому +5

    Rush too slow for 7 seaters...can’t RUSH it😅

  • @alfianabdulhalin1873
    @alfianabdulhalin1873 5 років тому

    U think Perodua's one will have the same features? (hopefully with cheaper price..?) :D :D :D

  • @T-rex513
    @T-rex513 5 років тому +4

    Engine wise... Brv win!

  • @vincentyeong2388
    @vincentyeong2388 5 років тому

    How is the built quality inside? Outlook is good, at least not "typical" design from toyota. lol

  • @docbadzvlogs2103
    @docbadzvlogs2103 5 років тому +2

    We (my family) have all toyota cars (fortuner, rush, innova) we are satisfied on Toyota.

  • @appreciatier
    @appreciatier 5 років тому

    Will be perfect with adaptive/normal cruise control lor....thinking of going long distance.

  • @cbtan3
    @cbtan3 5 років тому

    Is the 2nd and 3rd row seat adjustable?

    • @charischin9321
      @charischin9321 5 років тому

      Yes middle n last rows are both adjustable.

  • @DylanChng
    @DylanChng 5 років тому +2

    Surprised that this is assembled in Perodua's factory. I know that Perodua have previously assembled the Avanza but still.

    • @kbcjong
      @kbcjong 5 років тому

      To reduce the production cost of this rush bcoz its sibling perodua suv also will be produce on the same production line. So basically toyota just buying some of the cbu unit from perodua while perodua running its suv mass production and rebagde it to toyota.

  • @jeyaseelandevavaram2371
    @jeyaseelandevavaram2371 5 років тому +8

    Brv looks gorgeous comparing Rush..also BRV engine is much better than Rush.

    • @Daniel-tw2xg
      @Daniel-tw2xg 5 років тому +2

      stop lying to yourself idiot

    • @ijamijam5560
      @ijamijam5560 5 років тому +1

      Something wrong with rear brv..... My 2 cent

    • @mrtorpedokl
      @mrtorpedokl 5 років тому

      rush has better look

  • @henrybautista6103
    @henrybautista6103 5 років тому

    I won't compomise the safety of my passenger with 6 airbags and the rear wheel drive is effective for 7 passenger or on highland roads and lastly the ground clearance is important for the weather condition in our country - floods & poor road condition...this is a mini suv not a race car.

  • @mohamadikhwannaimaziz2809
    @mohamadikhwannaimaziz2809 5 років тому

    engine spec for new rush?

  • @AJ6spd
    @AJ6spd 5 років тому +10

    Rush looks like a smaller version of fortuner

    • @jsfoo_23
      @jsfoo_23 5 років тому +1

      “Baby fortuner”😂

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому +1

      It's a beefed up first gen avanza.

  • @limitededitionwa8237
    @limitededitionwa8237 5 років тому +2

    Personally I like BRV

  • @grandmastersemos84
    @grandmastersemos84 5 років тому

    Wahh Malaysian Ver hv different exterior n interior, compare to philipines n indonesia... why ah? And I saw blue color too? Why here don’t have that color option?

  • @emo137
    @emo137 3 роки тому

    how about road noise on BRV?

    • @BobbyAngmalaysia
      @BobbyAngmalaysia  3 роки тому

      This segment can't expect much. But considered acceptable. Maybe after buying go get it sound proof :)

  • @m.sureshkumar8050
    @m.sureshkumar8050 4 роки тому

    Bobby you have missed the 3rd row access and space Comparison.

  • @khasmindersingh6826
    @khasmindersingh6826 5 років тому

    Toyota doesn't have a model to compete directly with Honda's CR-V. So they had to offer something in between CR-V and BR-V. The Rush's taillights are a safety hazard.

  • @everslimsmith8907
    @everslimsmith8907 5 років тому +3

    Design & features toyota.
    Drive & engine Honda...
    When you drive Rush on Road men it feels like car is not stable too much movement on the suspension you can tell it by driving it. Pretty sure anyone who drives both will agree with me

  • @fareezthegreat4394
    @fareezthegreat4394 5 років тому +1

    It really looks like avanza or Innova.. not the old version of rush, like jeep or some kind of that.

  • @prettykapas3723
    @prettykapas3723 3 роки тому

    Love Toyota Rush.

  • @twinklestar212
    @twinklestar212 5 років тому

    How much BRV price compared to RUSH?

    • @TYT695
      @TYT695 5 років тому

      emkay rizuan .. Rush is very slight more expensive.. Almost negligible

  • @not5available
    @not5available 5 років тому

    I feel sorry for who ever have bought Rush before. Only after a year Perodua is launching the same model with lower price.

  • @David-ur5jd
    @David-ur5jd 5 років тому +4

    rush so much more better 👍

  • @onezeroone354
    @onezeroone354 3 роки тому

    Anything else that you missed you ask? - yes drive it before you can compare.

  • @fadhlyzakaria8629
    @fadhlyzakaria8629 5 років тому

    If i were to buy either 1, which is gonna be? Please help.. i like the brv all this while, however when the new rush out, it became unsure for me to choose due to both suited me well..

    • @BobbyAngmalaysia
      @BobbyAngmalaysia  5 років тому

      The Rush massively out-specced the BRV this time around. A larger car too. Manlier, more SUV-like.

    • @fadhlyzakaria8629
      @fadhlyzakaria8629 5 років тому

      Thanks man for the reply.. appreciate much.. really need u to review head to head for rush, brv n expander.. is going to be rush vs brv vs expander soon, wanted to know which 1 better..

    • @fadhlyzakaria8629
      @fadhlyzakaria8629 5 років тому

      Ice Inducer : what do u think man.. which its gonna be, the best among the 3?

    • @kbcjong
      @kbcjong 5 років тому +1

      Just wait for a few month as rush siblings perodua suv will make a debute and i believe much cheaper than this rush.

    • @JeffersonLim
      @JeffersonLim 5 років тому

      Cha Om plot twist. Perodua version a SWB 5 seater like Nautica!

  • @MahinderSingh-sl4tr
    @MahinderSingh-sl4tr 5 років тому +2

    how many speakers is this 2018 rush

  • @MrLexthelord
    @MrLexthelord 5 років тому +2

    LOOOL at the 'we have a lot of snatch thieves here'

  • @jimmyflores7223
    @jimmyflores7223 5 років тому

    CVT + fuel efficiency Honda has an edge. If Toyota make it CVT. Rush...is the winner

  • @rafieboy05
    @rafieboy05 5 років тому +2

    Its takes toyota 10year to create a proper rival for 2 years old brv 😅.

    • @mrchristmh2
      @mrchristmh2 3 роки тому

      Hahahahhahah
      True..
      I see copy cats
      And the reviewer bias with no experience driving daily a BRV or RUSH

  • @brandonczw
    @brandonczw 5 років тому +1

    Would definitely buy the rush if it had at least a 2.0 engine + CVT. With the 1.5 it’s going to be so underpowered.... but anyway it’s not a premium SUV or whatsoever. Though with the features it has it actually could be.

    • @limboonhong64
      @limboonhong64 5 років тому +2

      Because this is rear wheel drive and engine position place are different compare to normal car and the gearbox should be center unlike in Vios or Sienta in left just beside battery position. So CVT definetely can't fit and with CVT in Vios this car will more underpower although better cruising on highway with lower rpm and less fuel consumption than 4AT. If Toyota can make with 6AT like Innova and add more power maybe a 1.8L engine then this will more better power when overtake on highway speed. Even 1.8L u will feel not as fast as Altis 1.8L since this car heavier especially if carry more stuft and passenger

    • @brandonczw
      @brandonczw 5 років тому +1

      Lim Boon Hong yes, i totally agree with u. At least a 1.8 would be nice. A 6 speed would be lovely too but i think it’s a bit too much to ask for. cvt would be best for this segment.

    • @limboonhong64
      @limboonhong64 5 років тому +2

      Problem is CVT maybe not enough durable in this type of SUV like even the upper segment Innova. In some country they need high reliability and easy maintenance MPV or SUV. Thats why Avanza and Rush selling well in Indonesia. I really hope Vios can get Super CVT-i instead of current CVT. If u have test Altis 1.8 and the Vios u will know when acceleration the different of the good CVT with a little bit fun instead of boring and loud noise CVT in the Vios.

    • @limboonhong64
      @limboonhong64 5 років тому +2

      If Toyota can offer 1.5L NA with 4AT and 1.8L NA with 6AT this would be good.

    • @magemlegends111
      @magemlegends111 5 років тому +1

      rush owner here, i find my car great, i was sceptical at first but this past few months of using it, it's not that underpower to me, those are just numbers, until you try its capabilities. 😊

  • @sartv386
    @sartv386 4 роки тому

    the problem on toyota is all model such as vios, rush, avanza, yaris all uses the same model engines...and also that engine use by myvi 1.5, aruz, alza.....no changes all same quality of engines, and the power also same only the out looks and degsine and models of the name different only.....

  • @blueeagle2722
    @blueeagle2722 5 років тому +2

    Sorry guys but looks is subjective to one's appreciation performance is the best selling point! In engine performance with 120hp/145Nm of torque the most powerful and the most fuel efficient averaging 18 km/L this would go to the BRV plus a CVT equipped with a seven speed paddle shifter which Rush and Xpander don't have and the BRV came out first and most of its features had just copied by Toyota Rush even the mag wheels design are almost Identical... BRV still wins.
    BTW this video is very biased to Toyota Rush. Lol!

  • @semileong
    @semileong 5 років тому +1

    Is that guy calling you Ong ??? My goodness. Is he in the car industry? How can u not know Bobby😂

    • @BobbyAngmalaysia
      @BobbyAngmalaysia  5 років тому +1

      The guy who told me 50kg is mr ong .... he then wrongly state "one five" where in fact it's 50kg haha

  • @muhdfauzan3008
    @muhdfauzan3008 5 років тому +1

    pada sy lebih smart rush dari luar..dlm brv lgi....enjin ofcoz honda...

  • @rjcatalonia8790
    @rjcatalonia8790 5 років тому +3

    The Rush Malaysian version is better than what we have here in Philippines. It has more features by just watching this video
    Rushowner here

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому

      What's the RPM when you reach 100kph?

    • @Kyle-kc8cw
      @Kyle-kc8cw 5 років тому

      Sadly, majority of the cars in Malaysia do have better specs than the ones in Philippines, for very similar prices. I'm not sure why.

    • @rjcatalonia8790
      @rjcatalonia8790 5 років тому +1

      Mb legend rpm was approx 3500

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому +1

      @@rjcatalonia8790 wow that's high

    • @alifhashim3752
      @alifhashim3752 3 роки тому

      @@Kyle-kc8cw I think they are forced to give higher specs for these category of cars in Malaysia cause it does not sell well. Malaysians have moved away from 7 seater SUVs. So vehicles like Mazda CX5, Honda CRV, Nissan XTrail, Subaru XV and Forrester etc sells better now. 7 seater SUV market is dying. The VW Tiguan also sells quite well here. I think it also reflects the smaller families nowadays.

  • @mohammadsshaharom5807
    @mohammadsshaharom5807 5 років тому +1

    Im waiting perodua will coming out soon..

  • @daniasyraf2161
    @daniasyraf2161 5 років тому +4

    If there put the same power engine like honda brv it will be good

  • @kerelbort
    @kerelbort 5 років тому +4

    toyota is back with a vengeance... trying to regain their crown back from honda

  • @VacancyJB
    @VacancyJB 5 років тому

    the rush headlight is nice, but the bumper has too much design on it...

  • @azaharizyas9265
    @azaharizyas9265 5 років тому +2

    Exora and rush mana yg besar

  • @PakDie
    @PakDie 5 років тому

    i choose toyota rush..may be i must trade in my perodua alza...

  • @Zianrhn
    @Zianrhn 5 років тому

    I think rush is better cause it is still comfortable in ugly roads

  • @jeremiahgiam22
    @jeremiahgiam22 5 років тому +1

    Entered the BRV for 30 seconds.. And.. Woops.. There goes the B-RV's carpet 😂

  • @yasirXhah
    @yasirXhah 5 років тому

    Both the prizes are very difference.
    Rush 3.7M
    Brv 2.3 M

    • @1041ghost
      @1041ghost 5 років тому +1

      Depends on where you're from. The highest variant BRV here is 92k, the highest variant Rush is 97k. Relatively small difference.

  • @mohdizzan99
    @mohdizzan99 5 років тому

    His pseocologist Toyota Rush has won even when compared to the Honda BR-V

  • @mafizization
    @mafizization 5 років тому

    Where is midle headrest in the second row 🙄🙄

  • @yudiprasetyo7785
    @yudiprasetyo7785 5 років тому

    test challege rush vs brv at the mountain and highway. use full gas and brake . gas and brake. gas and brake.

  • @sheikhfirdaus11
    @sheikhfirdaus11 5 років тому

    We can see almost 70% the new myvi part interior there...white color interior looks wierd...silver finish bodykit make it looks bad...toyota should used fortuner finishing better

  • @user-zq8js5uz2g
    @user-zq8js5uz2g 5 років тому

    how are in to vietname

  • @MrAdrianChong
    @MrAdrianChong 5 років тому +1

    Brv can hold up to 30kg

  • @RemJJO
    @RemJJO 4 роки тому

    Im glad that I bought the Honda BR V 1.5 V cvt 🥰

  • @henrybautista6103
    @henrybautista6103 5 років тому +3

    BRV most space and comfort ..

  • @neo1071129
    @neo1071129 5 років тому

    Try sitting on 3rd row bro.. Den compare it again..

  • @fiq4697
    @fiq4697 5 років тому +1

    Prefer honda....toyota design serabut,tapi design belakang lawa berbanding brv..manakala dalam brv lebih luas berbanding rush,rush duduk tgh2 lutut pn dh cukup2 makan je...sempit dkt sngt dkt kerusi driver

  • @izzahsaza820
    @izzahsaza820 5 років тому

    Still believe with Toyota

  • @_arleon6411
    @_arleon6411 4 роки тому

    I think we cannot compare honda brv to toyota rush. It’s like comparing apple to banana hehehe

  • @amri6
    @amri6 5 років тому +8

    Toyota rush 2018 nice but engine still under power for full loading passenger... Brv can say bye bye 👋👋 for rush at genting....hahahaa

    • @magemlegends111
      @magemlegends111 5 років тому +2

      rush owner here, i find my car great, i was sceptical at first but this past few months of using it, it's not that underpower to me, those are just numbers, until you try its capabilities. 😊 hence Rush is RWD so its faster plus they do have the same engine. So yeah Rush is rushing ahead of the Brv

    • @mblegend3056
      @mblegend3056 5 років тому

      @@magemlegends111 what's the RPM when reaching 100 kph?

    • @rr5008
      @rr5008 5 років тому

      Take Rush with manual transmission, it has more power than automatic version. Or in your country, you only have automatic version?

    • @amri6
      @amri6 5 років тому

      @@magemlegends111 of course the rush will eat smoke behind brv when climbing the hill .. rush 1300kg / 104hp / 136 nm tork VS brv 1240kg / 120hp / 145nm torque .. think about it..hahahaa.. brv acceleration 0 - 100 just under 10.8 second only. Try your new rush..😂😂

    • @erdyhafsham5835
      @erdyhafsham5835 5 років тому

      Ado Amrie that's right haha

  • @urbanmetal7802
    @urbanmetal7802 5 років тому

    Time for Toyota to beat the Jazz next.