@@myusername3689 LMAO we've got a real 'MURICAN here. What's the matter? Can't handle a little wood on your stock? A little too heavy for you my dear? Stick to your puny AR and go back to shooting beer bottles like a good little hillbilly. Let the men handle the AK, child....
@@myusername3689 I don't know or care who this "he" or "him" is that you're referring to. I'm talking about MY comment. I never mentioned anything about recoil. I don't know why you would write a reply to me about recoil when I never mentioned it in my comment in the first place.
Gojira Junior the ak actually still preforms fine after being dug out of mud and sand or even dirt, a lot of the reason you see aks in middle eastern countries is from old soviet stashes from the Cold War, they were dug up from the ground where there would be crates filled with sand/dirt and under all that are ak’s and dragunovs.
Tests on youtube show the AR-15 passes all torture tests from dumped in mud, sand, dirt. The AK-47 failed the mud test, mud entered the receiver and jammed the weapon and could not extract or go into battery. AR-15 also is not "true gas impingment system". The gas system actually has a piston and it is called a piston. Eugen Stoner also realized carbon is a natural lubricant and the rifle will run dry for a couple thousand rounds. The reason why there are new AK's out there (AK-74, AKM, Ak-12 and AK-103) is because they are outdated, the AR outperforms the AK. Some Spetsnaz train with M4's. The AK is not invincible.
@@AlejandroRodriguez-le7pm you can't say it outperforms it, the first AR-15s were really unreliable with 80% of the American soldiers in Vietnam reporting they weren't happy with the rifle and often picking up AKs from the enemy, sure the more modern ARs have a lot of adjustments, anti mud, durable ergonomics which can be slightly better than a rifle made in 1947. Another thing to consider is the price, AKs cost merely 700-1000$ meanwhile a modern AR would cost 2000-3000$, the fire rate is bigger on an AR platform, but emptying a magazine in 2 seconds by spraying is not recommended on any of these. All in all the AK has much simpler design and is much more versatile than the AR and probably that is the reason it is the most popular rifle in the world.
Most people forget the “47” in “AK-47” stands for the year it was invented - 1947. The fact that this gentleman is comparing it to a modern weapon speaks to its timeless nature and most importantly - reliability.
truthful Conch777 the Kalashnikov design of 1946 differed quite a bit from what would be the final product. It used a short stroke piston, could be separated into an upper and lower receiver, and featured most of its controls on the left side of the weapon. Also, it would be a stretch to say the weapon was finalized in 1947 as the design team was tinkering around with how the receiver would be made. You have the Type 1 which was stamped and finished around 1948, the Type 2 milled in 1951, and the Type 3 lightened milled in 1954.
but legend will die because can't notice he don't have ammo in magazine, it hasn't breechblock holding function and you have to fully cock it after insert new magazine
F1rstResponder I totally agree with your point... but realistically a decent AK is $800-1000 and a scar can be had for 2500. Its a little exaggerative to say the ak is 1:10 the price of the scar
The SCAR does have a very unique feel. The recoil is really soft and smooth. For some reason I always think of it as walking on sand, whereas other guns are usually like normal pavement.
But has almost twice the amount of muzzle rise as the AK. It’s just a different recoil pulse. Anyone who’s shot an AK will tell you it has basically the same recoil as an AR 15. If you say the AK has a lot of recoil you’re not shooting it right lol
@@mrmidnight32 I own the Scar H version (.308) and I can safely say it’s almost exactly same recoil. The actual impulse of recoil is much softer/smoother than all my AKs
An fucking ak-47 isnt a toyota corolla its an old car maybe but it drives even faster if you think about the power the shots have of the ak the scar dont have this potency of an ak so dont make fun of an ak
Comparing AK with other rifles is the same like comparing Gladius vs. Any_other_blades. Gladius was designed for total war, it was cheap, simple and deadly efficient. So is AK - there are more than 70 millions officially produced. When some new weapon can beat this value then it is time to compare it with AK.
The Scar didn't pick up the next round "malfunction", because it was on the suppressed gas setting. That's also why it was shooting so soft. I'm actually surprised it was feeding so consistently! When my Scar is on the suppressed setting, it almost never picks up the next round.
@@ThePlatinumsquirrel yeah the plug can go into three “modes” the suppressed is all the way over the gas plunger that you see at the start of video. Vertical is full gas and to the right is disassembly of the gas.
He talks about the recoil being so tame on a 5.56.. Well yea when you compare 5.56 with 7.62x39 of course it seems like that. But it would be a much more fair comparison with the 5.56 scar and a ak74 chambered in 5.45x39
Boneheadedbruhs that has nothing to do with anything. I never said 7.62x39 was hard to handle. But comparative to the 5.56, it's significantly more. 5.56 is about 5.5 pounds of felt recoil. 7.62x39 is just shy of 10 pounds of recoil. Not that it's hard to handle, but compared to the 5.56, it's almost double. It's rather noticeable when shooting both back to back
"It's own charm" )) This is AKM, it was born in 1959. How we could compare it with modern assault rifle? SCAR is from 2000? Or later? I think we must choose AK 107 to compare with SCAR.... At least AK 74... By the way it is 1974 sample
+Eugene “Castian” Bernatsky И что? Что ты вообще пытаешься до нас донести? Я еще предположу, что это гражданская версия, т.к. автоматической стрельбы нам не показали. Что это меняет? И почему ты решил начать с оскорблений?
+Eugene “Castian” Bernatsky нет это не Американского производства, это Югославский М70 и он который на видео живёт в Словении которая была состава Югославии и тот автомат который он стреляет это Югославский М70.
The AK was never meant to be precise and ergonomic. It was meant to be mass produced by low wage factory workers and fired by peasants, and to keep firing until the last human being on the planet has expired. And to be fair it does all of those things excellently
The fact that you're comparing a modern weapon with one invented way back in 1947 itself speaks volumes of the reliability, durability and impact of AK
ICE TEA larger round doesnt always mean more punch (if you are talking about caliber) compare .50ae to a .458 socom or even a .308 in an AK. .50ae is a larger caliber but will never be as powerful as a .308 or .458 socom
The SCAR wins because 1: It has less recoil 2: It has a longer maximum effective range 3: It weighs less therefore you can operate longer and mobility is increased 4: It can be outfitted with many optics and attachments 5: It will certainly make you look like an operator I guess everyone has their own cup of tea
+PrivateZim well, while operation never changes, ergonomics do improve a lot with time (take this SCAR as a good example) and that is normally one of the important comparison factors.
playaaaLV ok... thx for stating the obvious. You do know that the manual of arms doesn't change either right? Even for the unicorns. And while the recoil on the AK108 would be less than the scar, the reload would be the same as an AK from the 50s. And it's still a unicorn so impossible to obtain that it's only relevant if you're some sort of specialoperationsmastersergeantshooterpersonextreme that doesn't buy their own weapons and yet still gets to choose.
playaaaLV first off... the manual of arms is at least as much as matter of ergonomics as it is mechanical operation. Second, it's still the same on all the AK platforms, with the tiny, insignificant exception of the safety on a couple, again, unicorns. Finally, what does anything you've said have to do with the original comment or my question in response? What is your point? Weapons can improve in ergonomics as the design is iterated? Awesome factoid dude! ....but the AK hasn't. The AK12 is arguably the biggest step toward "modernizing" the AK platform and all it really did was add practical rail capability... by completely redesigning the receiver around the same action. Everything is in the same place and works the same way except the safety, which barely matters. Name a significant ergonomic difference between a modern AK and an AKM made in the 60s or please cease with the pointless pedantry. Or... you know... make the effort to actually make a salient point that relates to the topic in some other way.
@@joedoran4758 I'm not an AK fan by any means, but I think the SCAR-16s sucks ass. Doesn't feed steel cased ammo well and has a reciprocating bolt. Doesn't seem worth the price they sell them for
@@joedoran4758 AK is the most mediocre rifle but the design and the thought put into the rifle is what makes most AK fans biased towards the AK. Also they just look the best
@@MelonMafia1 It depends on which ak you are referring to. Yes ak47 is very reliable but according to nowadays weapons is pretty outdated. It's something like the Browning m1911 this pistol remained in service for 90 years in the us military. And you must also take count that us soldiers in Iraq preferred aks instead of the m4 and m16 because of their reliability. The best gun for me is one of the most modern versions of the ak. Ak12 takes all the good staff from previous models. It is reliable, uses a 5.45cal bullet which means less recoil but at the same time the power effect of this weapon is the same with an ar15 which uses a 5.56cal. It's endurable and in my opinion is a masterpiece of Russian engineering. Russians and Germans know how to build a good rifle unlike the French
@@MelonMafia1 G3 is still in use in many countries and this gun was built in the 50' and mp5 is used by the entire world (almost)........... Just incredible
I was curious how an AK stacks up against a Scar. Not sure why people don't want to see such a comparison.... Not every comparison needs to be apples to apples....
A rather modern rifle like the SCAR should be compared to a modern AK. You should get your hands on a Krebs Custom AC-15 or get some Circle 10 AK upgrades for your old companion!
This video made me love this channel. Lot of gun channels are full of ego and displays of masculinity. This video was all about the joy of shooting and learning a new weapon.
Veronikka Bellucci Right...but we're talking about the best fruit, not to the best apple or the best orange. we're trying g to find the best gun? therefore you need to look at two guns that are different.
No, we don't have 3 "states", we have 3 different regions (but they do work like states) and these regions are divided in 10 provinces, which are more similar to the american states if you were to give Belgium and the USA the same proportions.
Best thing is there is still no match for the AK-47 even though it's a pre cold war weapon. Maybe others are sexy, got some nice comfort feature but when it comes to damage and durability both hands down to AK 👏👏👏
1. Thats an AKM, AK47 is shit in reality and replaced by AKM years later, which is much better in durability and reliability 2. Bigger bullet doesnt mean better damage, cause kalashnikov now starts producing more ak varisnts with 5.45 compared to akm 7.62, smaller bullets lead to higher velocity, and better trajectory
Correct... Light meaning, "minor" caliber, 5.56 NATO (.223) Heavy meaning, "heavy" caliber, 7.62x51 NATO (.308) I have shot both, the Light is a wonderful, "toy" gun... a, "scalpel", the Heavy is a long range, "sledge hammer" (Much heavier recoil of the .30 caliber round in a light weight, polymer platform. But the heavy's muzzle brake helps a LOT...) There are even a few after market barrels for the Light in calibers like .300 Blackout, which is kinda like a softer recoiling 7.62 x 39 bullet crammed into a 5.56 case. ;)
Yeah, that's right. SCAR-L fires 5.56x45, lighter than 7.62x51 that the SCAR-H uses. Because of the larger, more powerful cartridges in the H, magazines are smaller; 20 rounds normally, a SCAR-L generally has 30
doesn't matter, ak, akm, aks, rpk, there all same system, some improved in cosmetics or quality there equally reliable, norinco, arsenal, cugir, zastava, to name a few, there all kalashnikovs.
nop, owning several ar/aks I spoke about all ak rifles being the SAME SYSTEM, different variants, different quality... dragunovs are not rpks i know, the m16, hk 416 thing is a different matter of choice in this case i chose the AK to be a better system i also know a fancy wood, gold and diamonds wasr is not better than any norinco type 56s/arsenal/bulgarian. and i also know that fn scar should compare to hk, sig etc.
Both are ultimate but go to legendary AK If you go with modern AK it has upgraded much and its much dangerous than previous and also accurate and modern AK have all this qualities go for AK ALFA AK 400 AK 12 AK 15 AK 208 AK 308 AK 105 and even more are there now the problems are solved including heavieness recoil accuracy
The SCAR was designed with SOCOM in mind, the 7.62 model also has little to no recoil as well (The AR type platform was modular but lacked reliability and why not make ergonomics better?). It's also very durable and able to handle rough conditions. I want to buy one, but it's a little outside of my pay grade XD (If I were to buy one, I'd get the SCAR 17; love the hard hitting 7.62x51 round)
in my experience the scar in 7.62 has a considerable amount of recoil, more so than even the g3 or fal. no way around it on such a light rifle without a complicated system in place.
You said it all brother. Maybe I will win the lottery, I just need enough to get the Scar, the m1a and maybe a new 1911 for kicks and giggles. That's it, I'm not greedy. Those 2 rifles and the one handgun to go with what I already have. When I leave this earth I will have some nice toys to leave my son.
roy e I dont think Jonty has ever fired one, nobody that has fired one would say that. Probably a video gamer. . . You're about right, the Scar 17 is similar in recoil to the AR. And I dont know what he is talking about either when it comes to the G3 ; HK-91 clone's recoil is beautiful (unless you decide to magdump then muzzle rise will get ya). I don't know about the FAL, havent shot an FAL. but they all use the same round, and I expect that the FAL would have small recoil too
Well, the AK-107 has the counterweight system similar to the AEK-971, so it's not really a true AK like the AK-12. Furthermore, the AK in AK-107 doesn't stand written out as "Avtomat Kalashnikova" (what the AK in AK-47, AKM, AK-74 and AK-12 means), but rather "Alexandrov-Kalashnikov", Yuri Alexandrov being the designer of the AK-107.
Before the tests, it was necessary to throw both rifles into the dirt, for about a day. After you get out, shake out the dirt and without cleaning carry out the test :)
Brother ! You said you liked the AK better but your eyes can't lie!!! I own a 17 also AKs ARs and the new Rock River PDS pistol here is how they line up.. In a combat situation SCARheavy then RRA PDS SBR suppressed then AR15 Noveske.. Last AK the AK is only as good as the mag. You hear a lot about how they run but here to say I see them fail to fire many time because of different problems.. But Great video..
+Fastflyingpigs Depends on your own preference!! Not all like a MG over an Assault riffle!! Not all snipers would pick aDMR over a Bolt action!! Same here....some just like the AK because of thei own liking!!
you're stupid for thinking all that is old is gold, and that modern technology cannot surpass that. for example, that jerk middle-aged neighbor, and a car with a crank to start it.
remember this is a SCAR-L ... you might be using a SCAR-H in the game ? but I agree that sometimes games do not reflect reality but they try to be balanced
AK wins hands down. 1) better harmonic which does not kill optics 2) doesn't hurt your knuckles when you pull the lever 3) it hasn't replicating charging handles cutting off your fingers if you don't handle it properly 4) its stock can break open a door and doesn't break if you treat it badly 5) it doesn't break if you load it with magpul's magazines 6) it hasn't virgin picatinny rails, only chad wood forniture whch endured tge test of time
Alberto Amoruso it also was designed and made in the 40-50s and as a mass production weapon... yet it can still be compared to some of the top rifles of this century
I’m glad you like it 🙂 it has been a massive succes for us. Not as much as our machineguns or the FAL but the SCAR are well liked by many nations. Our entire army is replacing their FNC’s (wich are also excellent rifles) they are based on the AK and M16, taking the advantages of both systems and put into one. Being the reliable operating system of the AK and the 5.56 round and magazine comptability with the M16. The SCAR is basically a 21st century application of our FNC. Our Army uses them in tan and the special police units get the black variants. A friend of mine completed infantry training and will be sent to Libanon in september with his brand new SCAR, he said the H variant shoots nice as well. But he has the L variant with the std barrel. He prefers the FNC for longer range shooting, it feels more stable. But the SCAR is more comfortable and allows for a lot of customization. But they are expensive yes, in the US they might go from 3000-5000 USD. But the parts are finished to fine tolerances and the engineering that went into the rifle is top notch. They are quite reliable as well, maybe not as much as the AK or FNC but it came very close second to the HK416 during tests conducted by SOCOM for their next rifle. Firing well over a million rounds in all kinds of circumstances.
Jeste. Možda su mogli da nabave neku novu rusku AK 74 u 5.45mm. Bilo bi objektivnije poređenje. Ovako, čelik i drvo u 7.62 protiv čelika i polimera u 5.56 stvarno izgleda bez veze (vizuelno). Ne znam zašto svi na YT imaju potrebu da upoređuju AK 47 platformu sa svim ostalim oružjem na planeti. Ako do sada nisu shvatili da od AK nema bolje (pogotivu ove SRB), onda da ga je..m :-)
From what I can see, you were shooting the SCAR in the suppressed gas setting. This may have been the reason for the feeding issue - not enough gas to cycle the action properly.
Why AK-47 is popular in India, Pakistan and China and also Africa, its because they have terrain with big forest and ups and down, small hills. They mostly engage at 300-400 meters and AK-47 delivers the bullet effectively at this distance. Plus 5.56 bullet start tumbling if it even hit a branch of a tree but AK-47 bullets ignores every small object. Pakistan also made PK-18 which is way effective and way lighter than AK-47. it uses 7.62 x 51mm rounds and it is just basically an AR-15 with 7.62 x 51 mm. This gun is awesome.
The problem with this video is you got the scar in suppressed mode. You have to keep the gas plug vertical otherwise you’ll get malfunctions of short stroking.
I think... that the SCAR 17 would've been better because it Shoots a similar cartridge. And the AK15 would also be better, because it is a modern rifle.
Hmm is that not Zastava M70 because AK has only 2 holes on the handguard. So if you see a little bit closer you will see 3 holes. That mean's it is Zastava M70 the Yugoslav version of AK. What do you think guys?
боже до чего убогое сравнение ...выб еще Скар с ППШ сравнили =( что слабо АК-103 или АК-105 или Ак-12 взять ? (если вам уж так именно АК надо)....и если всеж созреите то хоть ОБВЕСЫ на стволы равные повесте...
AK47 is SCAR grandfather You weren't fairly compare both battle riffle as those two monster bear widely gaped technology and philosophy AK47 is everybody riffle while SCAR intended for "Premium User" , perhaps You should look after AK103 to compare with SCAR, at least AK103 timeline is just about the same as SCAR. Anyway Your deserve to have highest appreciation for Your Videos. Great Job
KA1N3R well accuracy and comfortability, obviously yes. But if I'm going to war and I know I'll be out there for a while, I'd rather have a more reliable weapon at my disposal
Believe me, it is more reliable. There are a lot of beautiful and of functional rifles. M4 is certainly one of them. And this SCAR does not look ugly. For photography I took one of them. But if my life depended on the gun I'm carrying, I would choose AK (Serbian or Russian, not Chinese).
Only one thing needs to be said here: In SCAR (actually in most of FNH weapons), you don't need to hang a big brick in the muzzle to control the recoil!
2340: tesla interdimensional blaster vs ak47
AK WINS
@@myusername3689 LMAO we've got a real 'MURICAN here. What's the matter? Can't handle a little wood on your stock? A little too heavy for you my dear? Stick to your puny AR and go back to shooting beer bottles like a good little hillbilly. Let the men handle the AK, child....
@@myusername3689 I didn't mention recoil either. Don't know where you got that idea from buddy.
@@myusername3689 I don't know or care who this "he" or "him" is that you're referring to. I'm talking about MY comment. I never mentioned anything about recoil. I don't know why you would write a reply to me about recoil when I never mentioned it in my comment in the first place.
Gojira Junior the ak actually still preforms fine after being dug out of mud and sand or even dirt, a lot of the reason you see aks in middle eastern countries is from old soviet stashes from the Cold War, they were dug up from the ground where there would be crates filled with sand/dirt and under all that are ak’s and dragunovs.
Many hundreds year later : AR150 vs AK47
yes....if you wanna compare then compare with ak variant like ak103
And ak 47 will still win
Tests on youtube show the AR-15 passes all torture tests from dumped in mud, sand, dirt. The AK-47 failed the mud test, mud entered the receiver and jammed the weapon and could not extract or go into battery. AR-15 also is not "true gas impingment system". The gas system actually has a piston and it is called a piston. Eugen Stoner also realized carbon is a natural lubricant and the rifle will run dry for a couple thousand rounds. The reason why there are new AK's out there (AK-74, AKM, Ak-12 and AK-103) is because they are outdated, the AR outperforms the AK. Some Spetsnaz train with M4's. The AK is not invincible.
@@AlejandroRodriguez-le7pm India is Making Ak 203 Check it out It will be great check it out..plz plz
@@AlejandroRodriguez-le7pm you can't say it outperforms it, the first AR-15s were really unreliable with 80% of the American soldiers in Vietnam reporting they weren't happy with the rifle and often picking up AKs from the enemy, sure the more modern ARs have a lot of adjustments, anti mud, durable ergonomics which can be slightly better than a rifle made in 1947. Another thing to consider is the price, AKs cost merely 700-1000$ meanwhile a modern AR would cost 2000-3000$, the fire rate is bigger on an AR platform, but emptying a magazine in 2 seconds by spraying is not recommended on any of these. All in all the AK has much simpler design and is much more versatile than the AR and probably that is the reason it is the most popular rifle in the world.
Most people forget the “47” in “AK-47” stands for the year it was invented - 1947. The fact that this gentleman is comparing it to a modern weapon speaks to its timeless nature and most importantly - reliability.
Lol the Ak 47 is still a really great gun it will crush your bones
The 47 is the year the design was finalized...the first functional an was produced in 1946
truthful Conch777 the Kalashnikov design of 1946 differed quite a bit from what would be the final product. It used a short stroke piston, could be separated into an upper and lower receiver, and featured most of its controls on the left side of the weapon. Also, it would be a stretch to say the weapon was finalized in 1947 as the design team was tinkering around with how the receiver would be made. You have the Type 1 which was stamped and finished around 1948, the Type 2 milled in 1951, and the Type 3 lightened milled in 1954.
@Donald J. Trump ☑️ actually the M in AKM stands for modern . AKM is just improved AK 47.
Ak57 is also a good gun
2174: AK against the blaster.
XD
If usage by Stormtroopers is an indicator, the AK will probably have better accuracy 😂
Blaster doesnt hit shit.
Just saw: too late for star wars reference 😂
Year 2096
AK47 Still Used By Legends
AK is so good that people compare it to modern assault rifle
Good that i am russian
@@flowerofash4439 i am russian i have 5 Kalashnikov series rifles and my favourite is Ak-47.
but legend will die because can't notice he don't have ammo in magazine, it hasn't breechblock holding function and you have to fully cock it after insert new magazine
In video nit ak 47 , its akm from Romania "Zastava"
AK: $400
Scar: almost $4000
Need I say more...
F1rstResponder I totally agree with your point... but realistically a decent AK is $800-1000 and a scar can be had for 2500. Its a little exaggerative to say the ak is 1:10 the price of the scar
SCAR L/Mk16 ~2500
SCAR H/Mk17~4000
Tell me where I can buy a 400 dollar ak 😅😅😅😅
I'm ak
@@javik98k48 Afghanistan or Pakistan. Even a lot more cheaper.
The SCAR does have a very unique feel. The recoil is really soft and smooth. For some reason I always think of it as walking on sand, whereas other guns are usually like normal pavement.
But has almost twice the amount of muzzle rise as the AK. It’s just a different recoil pulse. Anyone who’s shot an AK will tell you it has basically the same recoil as an AR 15. If you say the AK has a lot of recoil you’re not shooting it right lol
@@mrmidnight32 I own the Scar H version (.308) and I can safely say it’s almost exactly same recoil. The actual impulse of recoil is much softer/smoother than all my AKs
Next up Mercedes-Benz C63 AMG vs 1998 Toyota corolla.
Prom better example would be Toyota Land Cruiser = AK
An fucking ak-47 isnt a toyota corolla its an old car maybe but it drives even faster if you think about the power the shots have of the ak the scar dont have this potency of an ak so dont make fun of an ak
Toyota Corolla (1998) It Isn't a car, it's a facking TANK
more like c63 vs 1970 chevelle 454.... it's old, but it's going to knock the dog shit out of that expensive plastic.
Corolla would win
Far Far Far away galactic... AK47 vs The Death Star
Ak wins because much faster fire rate
@@durim187 The death star is literally a giant T34, if AK can’t do it, T34 will.
AK wins.
AK is fine!
Why do you compare new weapon to the one developed in 1940s? Try AK-12 instead.
+
+MarshallJukov we gotta tell that to the AK Union guy...
+MarshallJukov Yeah
I'd prefer the Kalashnikov rifle series. RPK, AKM, AK-74, AK-74U and many more variation...
they are among the variants, dude!
next up, mosin vs g36
great comment
So it's "ok" to compare an M4A1 with an AK but not with a SCAR ?
They are clearly not 2 AR's...
#logic2016
musket vs mp5
ak47 vs stg44
oawefajweee Хохотал в голос!
The way the AK reloads is quite sastifying especially Under technique
It’s really easy to put in the magazine blind. Love it.
Comparing AK with other rifles is the same like comparing Gladius vs. Any_other_blades. Gladius was designed for total war, it was cheap, simple and deadly efficient. So is AK - there are more than 70 millions officially produced. When some new weapon can beat this value then it is time to compare it with AK.
200 million in circulation not 70ml
The Scar didn't pick up the next round "malfunction", because it was on the suppressed gas setting. That's also why it was shooting so soft. I'm actually surprised it was feeding so consistently! When my Scar is on the suppressed setting, it almost never picks up the next round.
That's a thing? Like a suppressed setting?
I’m glad you picked up in that as well.
@@ThePlatinumsquirrel yeah the plug can go into three “modes” the suppressed is all the way over the gas plunger that you see at the start of video. Vertical is full gas and to the right is disassembly of the gas.
"A legend never dies"
AK-47
That is how i feel about the SKS.
@@iowa_lot_to_travel9471🤣
Holy shit, the almost non-existent recoil on the SCAR
+IronSnake88 Yeah, it's almost like video games are wildly unrealistic or something :P
+IronSnake88 remember this is "SCAR-L" not "SCAR-H"
+komaki Scar 17 has softer recoil than my AR
+Henry Berger You must have one shitty AR then.
komaki Is there a difference? If so what is it? I'm lazy to do my own research lmao
He talks about the recoil being so tame on a 5.56.. Well yea when you compare 5.56 with 7.62x39 of course it seems like that. But it would be a much more fair comparison with the 5.56 scar and a ak74 chambered in 5.45x39
Hunter Carney a 7.62 recoil is not that much greater. unless you a lil bitch.
Boneheadedbruhs that has nothing to do with anything. I never said 7.62x39 was hard to handle. But comparative to the 5.56, it's significantly more. 5.56 is about 5.5 pounds of felt recoil. 7.62x39 is just shy of 10 pounds of recoil. Not that it's hard to handle, but compared to the 5.56, it's almost double. It's rather noticeable when shooting both back to back
Hunter Carney Absolutely. And he didn't even shoot from Ak. Here we go again.
thank u
just saying... scar is made by FN, which is belgian...
Year 2060: plasma rifle with range 40 watt vs AK-47
Y e s
Dah Oozee Nein Milimeetah vs AK 47
It's just what you see pal.
"It's own charm" )) This is AKM, it was born in 1959. How we could compare it with modern assault rifle? SCAR is from 2000? Or later? I think we must choose AK 107 to compare with SCAR.... At least AK 74... By the way it is 1974 sample
+
+Андрей Кузнецов ++
+Eugene “Castian” Bernatsky
И что? Что ты вообще пытаешься до нас донести? Я еще предположу, что это гражданская версия, т.к. автоматической стрельбы нам не показали. Что это меняет? И почему ты решил начать с оскорблений?
+Eugene “Castian” Bernatsky нет это не Американского производства, это Югославский М70 и он который на видео живёт в Словении которая была состава Югославии и тот автомат который он стреляет это Югославский М70.
+some random guy
M70 is verry good weapon
Regards
to Russia
Serbian Wolf
The AK was never meant to be precise and ergonomic. It was meant to be mass produced by low wage factory workers and fired by peasants, and to keep firing until the last human being on the planet has expired. And to be fair it does all of those things excellently
Dimitar Nazarov it was used by Vietnamese farmers .
Mitch Speth, after humanity expires.
Dimitar Nazarov it's accurate
Anh Nguyen Vietnamese farmers are forbidden to own guns. Only VietCong government own AKs
but AK-74 is chambered in 5.45x39, and there's alot better AK like AK-103 and 104 for the one that Chambered in 7.62x39.
The fact that you're comparing a modern weapon with one invented way back in 1947 itself speaks volumes of the reliability, durability and impact of AK
"It's just so mello" Indeed...
Indeed, indeed.
Next time: medieval shooting tubes vs ACR.
AK wins because
1: Has larger round (means more punch)
2: can survive any terrain and torture test.
3:almost impossible to jam.
7.62mm has overpenetration which is good for me
ICE TEA
larger round doesnt always mean more punch (if you are talking about caliber) compare .50ae to a .458 socom or even a .308 in an AK. .50ae is a larger caliber but will never be as powerful as a .308 or .458 socom
@@BadaBing_3 Im not even from america but in my opinion not all AK are bad...
U forgot to mention about their price...ak-400$..while scar is almost like 4000$
The SCAR wins because
1: It has less recoil
2: It has a longer maximum effective range
3: It weighs less therefore you can operate longer and mobility is increased
4: It can be outfitted with many optics and attachments
5: It will certainly make you look like an operator
I guess everyone has their own cup of tea
yes this is the best SCAR-L video you can find on UA-cam.
u guys are awesome !
You'd better find a modern AK next time to compare with another modern rifle.
y? operation is the same. Unless you are talking about a unicorn like an ak108 or something.
+PrivateZim well, while operation never changes, ergonomics do improve a lot with time (take this SCAR as a good example) and that is normally one of the important comparison factors.
playaaaLV ok... thx for stating the obvious. You do know that the manual of arms doesn't change either right? Even for the unicorns. And while the recoil on the AK108 would be less than the scar, the reload would be the same as an AK from the 50s.
And it's still a unicorn so impossible to obtain that it's only relevant if you're some sort of specialoperationsmastersergeantshooterpersonextreme that doesn't buy their own weapons and yet still gets to choose.
PrivateZim
You're still talking about operation, not ergonomics (which is quite subjective, I must say).
playaaaLV first off... the manual of arms is at least as much as matter of ergonomics as it is mechanical operation.
Second, it's still the same on all the AK platforms, with the tiny, insignificant exception of the safety on a couple, again, unicorns.
Finally, what does anything you've said have to do with the original comment or my question in response? What is your point? Weapons can improve in ergonomics as the design is iterated? Awesome factoid dude!
....but the AK hasn't. The AK12 is arguably the biggest step toward "modernizing" the AK platform and all it really did was add practical rail capability... by completely redesigning the receiver around the same action. Everything is in the same place and works the same way except the safety, which barely matters.
Name a significant ergonomic difference between a modern AK and an AKM made in the 60s or please cease with the pointless pedantry. Or... you know... make the effort to actually make a salient point that relates to the topic in some other way.
He liked the SCAR..said negative things about AK and ended with I lean towards the AK
That's because ak fans refuse to admit when another gun is better
@@joedoran4758 I'm not an AK fan by any means, but I think the SCAR-16s sucks ass. Doesn't feed steel cased ammo well and has a reciprocating bolt. Doesn't seem worth the price they sell them for
@@joedoran4758 AK is the most mediocre rifle but the design and the thought put into the rifle is what makes most AK fans biased towards the AK.
Also they just look the best
@@MelonMafia1 It depends on which ak you are referring to. Yes ak47 is very reliable but according to nowadays weapons is pretty outdated. It's something like the Browning m1911 this pistol remained in service for 90 years in the us military. And you must also take count that us soldiers in Iraq preferred aks instead of the m4 and m16 because of their reliability. The best gun for me is one of the most modern versions of the ak. Ak12 takes all the good staff from previous models. It is reliable, uses a 5.45cal bullet which means less recoil but at the same time the power effect of this weapon is the same with an ar15 which uses a 5.56cal. It's endurable and in my opinion is a masterpiece of Russian engineering. Russians and Germans know how to build a good rifle unlike the French
@@MelonMafia1 G3 is still in use in many countries and this gun was built in the 50' and mp5 is used by the entire world (almost)........... Just incredible
Weapon fron the 50's VS Modern weapon
This literally proves that the AK is the best weapon to this day
Alezezbauz actually AK is from 1947
Old but better
I was curious how an AK stacks up against a Scar. Not sure why people don't want to see such a comparison.... Not every comparison needs to be apples to apples....
LOl Ak 47 is from 1942. It's upgrade Stg 44.
Ha-ha. Scar vs AKM? Maybe better Scar vs AK-12...
дружище,скар тоже не такой уж и новый
+I am the best Да, 2004 гол - совсем не новый... особенно против АКМ 1959.
Patr1ot scar vs an-94
Patr1ot or aek-791
or ak 107
or the russian mk 107
T-34 vs Abrams
@@installshieldwizard3017 dayum bruh
@@installshieldwizard3017 um...
🤣👍🔥
A rather modern rifle like the SCAR should be compared to a modern AK. You should get your hands on a Krebs Custom AC-15 or get some Circle 10 AK upgrades for your old companion!
Next time SCAR vs Mosin 91/30 !
+M30B35 SCAR vs Brown Bess Musket
+Paul ofthewall kek
+M30B35 or Fedorov Avtomat Rifle
+Tim Turner federov>scar built in vertical grip
+M30B35 ты тупой это нельзя сравнивать Мосина эта снайперская винтовка прошлого века !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This video made me love this channel. Lot of gun channels are full of ego and displays of masculinity. This video was all about the joy of shooting and learning a new weapon.
the scar being on the suppressed gas setting caused your malfunction. the selector was at 10 o clock, less gas, 12 o clock is normal
I think an honest comparison (granted without personal experience):
1. SCAR 17
2. Hk 416/17
3. Ak 12
Agreed. Even though most people forgot about the AK12 :(
Because AK-12 wasn't so good. Of course he has a cool new features that makes AK looks and feels new, but IzhMash fucked up with durability.
ak-107 man
This seems like an "apples and oranges" comparison (in the vedeo).
Veronikka Bellucci Right...but we're talking about the best fruit, not to the best apple or the best orange. we're trying g to find the best gun? therefore you need to look at two guns that are different.
Sir Mikhail Kalashnikov would be proud to see that his Legendary invention exists even in the era of Star Wars guns
My god the SCAR is gorgeous!
Terrible Tom Gay gun
Yes scar best
I think this is Yugoslavian/Serbian "Zastava M70".. It is kinda modified.
Everybody is a gangsta until the real gangsta arrive 6:43 🔥😂
If your gonna get a SCAR get a SCAR-H
He sayed it was really hard to find, he's lucky to even have shot it.
Русский ящерица
Its not hard to find lol all you do is have your local gun dealer order one in because i've ordered and purchased a SCAR-17Heavy
lordcrusade Well, he lives in east Europe, do you?
in the uk that you will get life in prison and on news ! people will scream like sheep !
*****
they have already taken over, long time ago ! why do you think the muslims and the government doesnt want brits armed !!
i like my guns like i like my waffles. Belgian.
Belgium makes pretty good weapons the last few years.
Not just the last few years. Before this the p90 the MAG the minimi the fnc the FAL.
Lol. I like my guns like I like my women........free, lol.
No, we don't have 3 "states", we have 3 different regions (but they do work like states) and these regions are divided in 10 provinces, which are more similar to the american states if you were to give Belgium and the USA the same proportions.
FN herstal and Heckler & Koch for that sweet quality.
Best thing is there is still no match for the AK-47 even though it's a pre cold war weapon. Maybe others are sexy, got some nice comfort feature but when it comes to damage and durability both hands down to AK 👏👏👏
1. Thats an AKM, AK47 is shit in reality and replaced by AKM years later, which is much better in durability and reliability
2. Bigger bullet doesnt mean better damage, cause kalashnikov now starts producing more ak varisnts with 5.45 compared to akm 7.62, smaller bullets lead to higher velocity, and better trajectory
AK is sexy as hell
I want to ask something,SCAR-L,The L stands for light and SCAR-H the H stands for heavy,Correct me if I'm wrong
Correct...
Light meaning, "minor" caliber, 5.56 NATO (.223)
Heavy meaning, "heavy" caliber, 7.62x51 NATO (.308)
I have shot both, the Light is a wonderful, "toy" gun... a, "scalpel", the Heavy is a long range, "sledge hammer" (Much heavier recoil of the .30 caliber round in a light weight, polymer platform. But the heavy's muzzle brake helps a LOT...)
There are even a few after market barrels for the Light in calibers like .300 Blackout, which is kinda like a softer recoiling 7.62 x 39 bullet crammed into a 5.56 case. ;)
Yeah, that's right. SCAR-L fires 5.56x45, lighter than 7.62x51 that the SCAR-H uses. Because of the larger, more powerful cartridges in the H, magazines are smaller; 20 rounds normally, a SCAR-L generally has 30
Thats correct
Still weird why they gave the heavy a 20 round magazine as with a drum it could be an lmg and the light a 30 round magazine
I like it but please remove the background music while shooting, I want to hear a clear gun shot
By the way u can't feel the real sound whatever is with background music or something else
I Love Scar in Dessert Brown it's Sick
this is zastava m70 ab1 from kragujevac serbia not ak -47
yeah, naab, but people will always name for example an akm with ak-47...because they are almost the same
doesn't matter, ak, akm, aks, rpk, there all same system, some improved in cosmetics or quality there equally reliable, norinco, arsenal, cugir, zastava, to name a few, there all kalashnikovs.
Rado Gajic see the bulged trunnion, that's a m70 opap. I've got that identical ak variant. He is right, it is robust!
frank 1040 and a m16a1 and a hk416 are the same thing because both of these has an ar15 receiver? come on!
nop, owning several ar/aks I spoke about all ak rifles being the SAME SYSTEM, different variants, different quality... dragunovs are not rpks i know, the m16, hk 416 thing is a different matter of choice in this case i chose the AK to be a better system i also know a fancy wood, gold and diamonds wasr is not better than any norinco type 56s/arsenal/bulgarian. and i also know that fn scar should compare to hk, sig etc.
Both are ultimate but go to legendary AK
If you go with modern AK it has upgraded much and its much dangerous than previous and also accurate and modern AK have all this qualities go for
AK ALFA
AK 400
AK 12
AK 15
AK 208
AK 308
AK 105
and even more are there now the problems are solved including heavieness recoil accuracy
M14 the best
@@warrenguardiario4828 m14 is shit. It goes out of headspacing constantly. Gas system is delicate and fucky.
Warren guardiario I really hope you’re joking, M14 is dogshit.
Ninja Gaming Galil Ace 32 is the best AK.
2019 and still pop in and watch. Love the video and the love of the scar you clearly have, it's just a damn good weapon
I feel like deep down inside he much preferred the scar
He freaking loved the SCAR
Almost Every feature was better lol, expect the AK always wins in reliability its like toyota camry lol
@@mostwanted5377 and price
The SCAR was designed with SOCOM in mind, the 7.62 model also has little to no recoil as well (The AR type platform was modular but lacked reliability and why not make ergonomics better?). It's also very durable and able to handle rough conditions. I want to buy one, but it's a little outside of my pay grade XD (If I were to buy one, I'd get the SCAR 17; love the hard hitting 7.62x51 round)
in my experience the scar in 7.62 has a considerable amount of recoil, more so than even the g3 or fal. no way around it on such a light rifle without a complicated system in place.
You said it all brother. Maybe I will win the lottery, I just need enough to get the Scar, the m1a and maybe a new 1911 for kicks and giggles. That's it, I'm not greedy. Those 2 rifles and the one handgun to go with what I already have. When I leave this earth I will have some nice toys to leave my son.
Cody Brown
I love the M1A. Damn good rifle. I need to get one to accompany my H&K 91
That is not true I own a 17s. The recoil is comparable to a 5.56 rifle. Do you own one?
roy e
I dont think Jonty has ever fired one, nobody that has fired one would say that. Probably a video gamer. . . You're about right, the Scar 17 is similar in recoil to the AR. And I dont know what he is talking about either when it comes to the G3 ; HK-91 clone's recoil is beautiful (unless you decide to magdump then muzzle rise will get ya). I don't know about the FAL, havent shot an FAL. but they all use the same round, and I expect that the FAL would have small recoil too
A century later:
Laser gun vs AK-47
Next video AR-15 vs Fedorov Avtomat.
Where are my bf1 Guys?
In my case the AKs are my favourite weapons.
1°--- AK-107
2°--- SCAR-H
3°--- M4A1
I_AM_RICHARDMLG I wish I could get a 101
Well, the AK-107 has the counterweight system similar to the AEK-971, so it's not really a true AK like the AK-12.
Furthermore, the AK in AK-107 doesn't stand written out as "Avtomat Kalashnikova" (what the AK in AK-47, AKM, AK-74 and AK-12 means), but rather "Alexandrov-Kalashnikov", Yuri Alexandrov being the designer of the AK-107.
RichardPlaysRandomly awm mauser k98k
Before the tests, it was necessary to throw both rifles into the dirt, for about a day. After you get out, shake out the dirt and without cleaning carry out the test :)
Brother ! You said you liked the AK better but your eyes can't lie!!! I own a 17 also AKs ARs and the new Rock River PDS pistol here is how they line up.. In a combat situation SCARheavy then RRA PDS SBR suppressed then AR15 Noveske.. Last AK the AK is only as good as the mag. You hear a lot about how they run but here to say I see them fail to fire many time because of different problems.. But Great video..
+Fastflyingpigs Depends on your own preference!!
Not all like a MG over an Assault riffle!!
Not all snipers would pick aDMR over a Bolt action!!
Same here....some just like the AK because of thei own liking!!
Great video, but a better comparison would be an AK-74. But hey guys I always enjoy your videos good job.
When you load the charger in the AK it makes a super satisfying sound!
why this stupids comparing newer guns with older guns....old is gold
you're stupid for thinking all that is old is gold, and that modern technology cannot surpass that. for example, that jerk middle-aged neighbor, and a car with a crank to start it.
But it will. In *time*
Prathap Reddy Just like Music
+Jon Campo its been beaten by the ar15 in mud tests
Gold is old
Its like 80 yo man joining marathon competing with 15 yo boys
Love that piston clinking sound
Him: almost no recoil
Games: recoil is perfection for the scar
remember this is a SCAR-L ... you might be using a SCAR-H in the game ? but I agree that sometimes games do not reflect reality but they try to be balanced
AK wins hands down.
1) better harmonic which does not kill optics
2) doesn't hurt your knuckles when you pull the lever
3) it hasn't replicating charging handles cutting off your fingers if you don't handle it properly
4) its stock can break open a door and doesn't break if you treat it badly
5) it doesn't break if you load it with magpul's magazines
6) it hasn't virgin picatinny rails, only chad wood forniture whch endured tge test of time
Alberto Amoruso
it also was designed and made in the 40-50s and as a mass production weapon... yet it can still be compared to some of the top rifles of this century
@@fauvacede170 Good designs never die
I’m glad you like it 🙂 it has been a massive succes for us. Not as much as our machineguns or the FAL but the SCAR are well liked by many nations.
Our entire army is replacing their FNC’s (wich are also excellent rifles) they are based on the AK and M16, taking the advantages of both systems and put into one. Being the reliable operating system of the AK and the 5.56 round and magazine comptability with the M16.
The SCAR is basically a 21st century application of our FNC. Our Army uses them in tan and the special police units get the black variants.
A friend of mine completed infantry training and will be sent to Libanon in september with his brand new SCAR, he said the H variant shoots nice as well. But he has the L variant with the std barrel. He prefers the FNC for longer range shooting, it feels more stable. But the SCAR is more comfortable and allows for a lot of customization.
But they are expensive yes, in the US they might go from 3000-5000 USD. But the parts are finished to fine tolerances and the engineering that went into the rifle is top notch. They are quite reliable as well, maybe not as much as the AK or FNC but it came very close second to the HK416 during tests conducted by SOCOM for their next rifle. Firing well over a million rounds in all kinds of circumstances.
That is, if i am not mistaken, Serbian Zastava M70 AB ;)
Jeste. Možda su mogli da nabave neku novu rusku AK 74 u 5.45mm. Bilo bi objektivnije poređenje. Ovako, čelik i drvo u 7.62 protiv čelika i polimera u 5.56 stvarno izgleda bez veze (vizuelno). Ne znam zašto svi na YT imaju potrebu da upoređuju AK 47 platformu sa svim ostalim oružjem na planeti. Ako do sada nisu shvatili da od AK nema bolje (pogotivu ove SRB), onda da ga je..m :-)
“ it’s completely different from an ak”
yeah, you don’t say.
First time shooting the FNH- scar,
hit after hit after hit.
Soft recoil.
Amasing rifle and TOP quality , because FNH ofcourse.
Please make a comparison of the SCAR Heavy and the G3. It would be interesting if the SCAR shoots so soft with the 7,62 ammo? Cheers
Winner winner chicken dinner
MegaCaptcha *_N O P U B G ! ! ! !_*
So....This is Vikendi in real life....
E
Fuck off pubg kid
@@outsider9262 you fuck off ....ass hole......you piss dog.....pubg is best
From what I can see, you were shooting the SCAR in the suppressed gas setting. This may have been the reason for the feeding issue - not enough gas to cycle the action properly.
2500: "super overpowered alien destroyer 5000" vs AK-47
Makes sense to compare the 17s to the AK
The seventeens im done
Reminds me of my trainings in the Belgian army. The scar is the standard Issued weapon.
Says everything negative about AK then positive about the SCAR.
“I lean more on the AK” 😂
Why compare a 5.56 to a 7.62?
? Both fire 7.62
Nope that is a mk16 which fires 5.56 x 45. He should have used the mk17 instead that fires the 7.62 x 51.
In other words SCAR H fires 7.62 x 51 and SCAR L fires 5.56 x 45.
Scar-L shoots 5.56........
Because with a 5.56 you get more range.. that's one reason why you would compare it. 7.62 is a bigger bullet so it drops faster.
My 2 fav rifles of all time !
How does it work in Slovenia?
Is it easy going outdoor shooting war weapons?
Big fan of the Scar in PS3 Rainbow 6 Las Vegas 😅
Rainbow 6: Vegas 1 and 2 are underrated gems of the sudo-stealth genre.
Why AK-47 is popular in India, Pakistan and China and also Africa, its because they have terrain with big forest and ups and down, small hills. They mostly engage at 300-400 meters and AK-47 delivers the bullet effectively at this distance. Plus 5.56 bullet start tumbling if it even hit a branch of a tree but AK-47 bullets ignores every small object. Pakistan also made PK-18 which is way effective and way lighter than AK-47. it uses 7.62 x 51mm rounds and it is just basically an AR-15 with 7.62 x 51 mm. This gun is awesome.
But the AK-12 is the best rifle at the moment.
One million years later in Galaxy : super duper blaster vs AK 47
The problem with this video is you got the scar in suppressed mode. You have to keep the gas plug vertical otherwise you’ll get malfunctions of short stroking.
Year 2142: Tesla 5000 giga watt VS AK-47
i was hoping to see the burst mode of SCAR
Wow that a zero recoil rifle
Scar has always been my favourite
U should compare light version with the heavy 7.62 version also
I think... that the SCAR 17 would've been better because it Shoots a similar cartridge. And the AK15 would also be better, because it is a modern rifle.
AK : I have been watching opponent's propaganda since my birth.
All of the special police units and some support units in my country are all equipped with SCARs
Hmm is that not Zastava M70 because AK has only 2 holes on the handguard. So if you see a little bit closer you will see 3 holes. That mean's it is Zastava M70 the Yugoslav version of AK. What do you think guys?
Yes it is, but it is a form of AK-47 in all the important things. Kind of a "modernized" AK-47
@@klipser66 Okay.
why you comparing a 556 few years ago with a 762 made in the 60s?
compare a scar-L with a ak-74m at least
+Bernardo Grando 5,56mm ; 7,62mm.
5.56 has been around since late 60s early 70s in the U.S. Military
everyone knows the scar wins by landslides three
Bernardo Grando Making the same mistake twice in a row certainly makes your inteligence questionable.
laszu Speaking as an American, I can't stand when people use commas instead of periods for decimal points.
The awesome fact about ak is that you will compare and use it the modern assualt rifles and it will never get old...
боже до чего убогое сравнение ...выб еще Скар с ППШ сравнили =( что слабо АК-103 или АК-105 или Ак-12 взять ? (если вам уж так именно АК надо)....и если всеж созреите то хоть ОБВЕСЫ на стволы равные повесте...
honestly, I'm over the SCAR. It's too bulky and too expensive for what it is.
AK47 is SCAR grandfather You weren't fairly compare both battle riffle as those two monster bear widely gaped technology and philosophy AK47 is everybody riffle while SCAR intended for "Premium User" , perhaps You should look after AK103 to compare with SCAR, at least AK103 timeline is just about the same as SCAR. Anyway Your deserve to have highest appreciation for Your Videos. Great Job
For Black OPS I take SCAR, for real war I take AK...
Americans guns killed more then the whole country holding aks.
Exiled man are you stupid. Russia lost millions more then the us ever lost . Russia needed the us in ww2 or they would have been erased
The problem with guns like SCAR is that it's so addictive to operate that you tend to forget that it's a lethal weapon and not a toy.
Nice to see the SCAR-L get some love lol I always see videos on the H
The SCAR seems like an obviously better rifle.
KA1N3R thanks alot captain obvious lol jk.
KA1N3R well accuracy and comfortability, obviously yes. But if I'm going to war and I know I'll be out there for a while, I'd rather have a more reliable weapon at my disposal
But is the AK really more reliable?
I mean, the SCAR is battle-tested as well and as far as I know, I never saw anyone who even jammed it, so...
Believe me, it is more reliable. There are a lot of beautiful and of functional rifles. M4 is certainly one of them. And this SCAR does not look ugly. For photography I took one of them. But if my life depended on the gun I'm carrying, I would choose AK (Serbian or Russian, not Chinese).
more kick than scar light 5.56??? bc is it an akm 7.62 ?????
Only one thing needs to be said here: In SCAR (actually in most of FNH weapons), you don't need to hang a big brick in the muzzle to control the recoil!
Next time T92 tank vs Napoleon Bonaparte cannons