The Collective Model

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @pontuswikstahl1261
    @pontuswikstahl1261 9 років тому +6

    I got Nuclear physics exam in 4 days! This is just what I need! I love you Dr Physics!! Your videos are great! I just want to zip on a cup of tea and listen to you all day!

  • @owenwilliams6860
    @owenwilliams6860 10 років тому +7

    Just wanted to say that last week I managed to secure a place at Cardiff Uni to study physics and astronomy largely due to your videos. You were a huge help, dude. Thank you.

    • @DrPhysicsA
      @DrPhysicsA  10 років тому +3

      Great news. Well done!

  • @hantiop
    @hantiop 11 місяців тому

    Dear DrPhysicsA, I am writing to express my gratitude. I am a philosopher of science, recently starting to work on a realism-instrumentalism debate that concerns how physicists actually developed and used nuclear models. With an undergraduate degree in physics, I was able to read some textbooks on nuclear models, but it was your video that helped me see a big picture in which different roles are played different models (e.g., the single-particle model, collective vibration model, collective rotation model, and unified model). I thank you very much for making those videos. You haven't uploaded new videos for many years, which seems to me a loss in the UA-cam community. Although I personally would love to see new videos from you, I wish you the best of luck with whatever career you are pursuing.

  • @kaanmckenna7030
    @kaanmckenna7030 2 роки тому

    My prof is apparanty a renowned nuclear physicist and he was absolutely abysmal at explaining all this. Thank you sir you're a life saver. About to graduate with my physics degree.

  • @anujmishra9077
    @anujmishra9077 8 років тому +1

    Your videos are a great help!! Thank you so much for your great work...

  • @IntroductoryChemistry-ge6tk
    @IntroductoryChemistry-ge6tk 8 років тому

    From a chemistry perspective this is excellent video. Through their nuclear equivalents, Using the part at 23 mins onwards I can finally see the basis for the angular momentum of s,p,d,f electron atomic orbitals, something that is never explained in chemistry textbooks. Would be great if you could make an equivalent video for electronic angular momentum. I'd happily direct chemistry students to it.

  • @maximusmcqueen
    @maximusmcqueen 10 років тому

    Thanks for the video cleared it up for me, nice to see your thesis work too!

  • @lovephysics
    @lovephysics 3 роки тому

    Awesome explanation.

  • @husseinghanim4517
    @husseinghanim4517 6 років тому +1

    Can you make a video for interacting boson model

  • @luispintoc
    @luispintoc 6 років тому +2

    Can you do a video for Even-Odd and Odd-Odd?
    Great video by the way!

    • @chenlecong9938
      @chenlecong9938 4 роки тому +1

      He’s got.The video on Semi Empirical Mass Formula

  • @mahwishmukhtar1847
    @mahwishmukhtar1847 6 років тому

    How we can calculate ratio b/w E^2 and E^0 or E^6 and E^4

  • @suryapratimpaul
    @suryapratimpaul 6 років тому +1

    Thank you sir.

  • @raihanhussain8835
    @raihanhussain8835 9 років тому +1

    sir please explain me the breit - wigner dispersion formula. sir please. i have my exam in three days. your videos are amazing.

  • @veganwolf3268
    @veganwolf3268 8 років тому

    Why does L^2 = L(L+1)?

  • @AddyRaina
    @AddyRaina 10 років тому

    How do you record your videos?

    • @DrPhysicsA
      @DrPhysicsA  10 років тому +1

      I use a digital camera on a tripod pointing vertically down onto A3 paper.

    • @virenderthakur9151
      @virenderthakur9151 7 років тому

      sir I am from India and I need suggestion coz m about to enrolled in Phd........whats ur email Id sir so that we could have some discussion

  • @Yllemanden
    @Yllemanden 9 років тому

    Just to be sure: The reason why the states with higher J values are in lower states is because of the thing you mention in the beginning ?

    • @kaiserdostuff
      @kaiserdostuff 9 років тому +2

      Yllemanden the exact reason came from derivation of J from potential model where they make use a negative sign term as an attractive potential. So, the more J you have, the more tightly bound the nucleus. It just a matter of sign, no particular weird stuff behind it. See spin-orbit coupling again, might helps.

  • @manojjha7877
    @manojjha7877 5 років тому

    Thanks sir