When are people going to realize that the Democrats and Republicans are on the same side? Both wings belong to the same bird. They are playing the hegelian dialectic ; Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. Problem, reaction, solution.
Birthdays are always on the same date, let's say for example, February 12, but each year on that date it will fall on a different day of the week in order.
Excellent work Sam, my only small contention, when Jesus was born CAN be determined by the courses of the priests, among other things, using only the Final authority, our KJB. With that said, Christmas should also be avoided. It's tough, but we are told not to be friends of the world. After 30+ years of recognizing and celebrating it, I realized that it doesn't honour Christ at all.
After all the good you did to explain the PAGAN EASTER Astarte Ishta Acts 12 absolutely biblically brilliant Then you Fall for the PAGAN CHRISTMAS LIE The queen of heaven the sungod And Roman Catholicism that fixed the date this is so sad we all were so Shocked !!! This is a very very sad day 😂😂😂😂😂😂📖📖
Nothing biblically brilliant about trying to justify the mistranslation of Easter instead of Passover. Another false teaching from a false teacher of the KJV only cult.
Is the King James Bible the only one to use Easter, No! So how did the pre-king james bibles translations do? Lets look! ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AD Bible Act 12/4 Easter? / Passover in N.T. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1382 Wickliffe N / All (Paske) 1525 Tyndale Y / N (all Easter) 1535 Coverdale Y / N (all Easter) 1537 Matthew Y / Both 1539 Cranmer / Great Y / Both 1539 Taverner's Y? / Both?? (revison of Matthew) 1557 Geneva (1557) Y / N (all Easter) 1568 Bishops Y / Both 1610 Douay-Rheims N / All (Pasch) That's all 9 English Bibles that came out before the King James. We have 7 out of 9 use Easter in Acts 12/4, 3 out of 9 use Easter every time, and 4 out of 9 use bouth words. The first one and the last tkae the word from the Greek So is the KJV right? To me this is about Herod and his tradition, To the Jews it's the days of unleavened bread, Herod is not a Jew, he is a pagan and would have followed the pagan traditions, and he (Herod) intending after Easter (his tradition) to bring him (Peter) forth to the people (Jews). To Herod it's the Easter time, to the Jews it's the passover time. As we have seen there can be up to a two week difference in the timing of Passover and Easter. So I have no problem with the word Easter in Acts 12/4.
Ostara is the pagan goddess of spring and associate with the hare, and also the dawn. Ishtar, Astarte, Isis are really all the same pagan fertility goddess with a different name or symbol depending on the region or era/timeframe. The same as the queen of heaven. It bugs me that Christendom celebrates this mingling of the holy with the profane...which is very displeasing to God. Obey and observe what He commanded with are His holy feasts. All of them are a depiction of the plan of deliverance, salvation and redemption. Christmas likewise is a spurious counterfeit.
Problem is despite Sam Gipp's worship of the KJV. Easter is a mistranslation. Ezekiel 45 v 21 makes it clear that Passover is a feast of seven days. Herod nor Luke who wrote the book of Acts had ever heard of Easter. Herod wanted to please the Jews, that is why he was waiting till after Passover. Pascha always mean Passover. But obviously Sam Gipp has made an idol of the imperfect uninspired KJV. So he is under strong delusions, but that is true of all who have been deceived by the KJV only heresy.
Sam's worship of the KJV? Let me ask you something: Do you worship God? You do? Then how do you know who God is? How do you know what constitutes worship? How do you know God accepts that worship? Words are what every Saint for the last 2000 years is to live by. The words have total and final authority. So which Bible in your language is perfect? You don't think there is one? How can you be sure you're worshiping God?
@@exothermal.sprocket Jesus made it clear that those who worship God must worship him in"Spirit and in truth". As the apostle Paul said "I know whom I have believed" his name is Jesus. I know him as well my Lord and Saviour the risen Christ. Neither did I say I do not believe in a perfect Bible. But there is certainly no "perfect" translation . Even the KJV translators knew their work was not perfect. They said that even the meanest translation is still the word of God. The KJV only cult which I have no doubt Satan has raised up. In their delusions pride and arrogance think they know better than the KJV translators. I believe that all the promises of God are yes and amen in Christ Jesus. Do you? They are in all the excellent modern translations that God has blessed us with Do you worship the Lord or some archaic imperfect English translation called the KJV?
@@samlawrence2695 My point was, you have to believe in a perfect Bible or else all your supposed knowledge of anything of God has been delivered you by other men whom you have no business trusting, or your own heart and mind which are just as unreliable. God hasn't spoken out of the sky, flown an angel through your house, or put tingles down your spine. You must rely on written words or you have nothing whatsoever at all. Oral traditions are unreliable, all other forms of preservation of information God has rejected. It's the written words. So either you have the perfectly preserved words of God in English, or you have nothing at all. So where are they? You can't have half-accurate, or mostly-accurate, or somewhat-deficient, because you cannot determine where the parts are that are supposedly deficient. If you can't trust the written words of God 100%, then you have no business at all trusting them 99%. If you believe the original autographs were perfect and that's where it all ended, then you believe in something more important than what God thought of the originals; He had them copied and re-written almost immediately in some cases. Neither has there ever been a complete collection of original autographs of the scripture anywhere in the world in one time. Never existed. How do I know these things? Besides all this clearly explained in the KJB, the data isn't hard to come by elsewhere. In fact, there's more reliable proofs that the written scriptures are everything they claim to be, than we have of recent American historical events.
@@exothermal.sprocket Your point is that you have no idea what you are talking about. That you have fallen for the KJV only deception which is nothing more than a man made tradition. So you are trusting men rather than God. Therefore contradicting yourself and using the usual double standards of the KJV only cult. Also you are calling the KJV translators liars who said their work was not perfect. Just as false teacher and KJV only cultist Sam Gipp calls them liars. Sam Gipp of course represents the extreme lunatic fringe of the insane KJV only cult. He is the man who said a Russian must learn English to have the "true" word of God. Not any old English but the archaic English where so many words have changed meaning of the KJV. Making the KJV even more inaccurate. Also where was the so called "perfect word of God" before 1611? KJV only cultist and false teacher Sam Gipp could not answer that. Also which of the at least ten different revisions of the KJV, is the "true word of God"? 1611 with the apocrypha? 1769? Oxford edition? Cambridge edition! Why do members of the KJV only cult not speak in KJV English? Because nobody would understand them. Showing what a load of arrogant two faced hypocrites the KJV cultists are. Yet this idolatrous blasphemous KJV only cult try to confine Almighty God to some archaic imperfect uninspired translation called the KJV. There is no such thing as a perfect translation in any language no matter what the KJV only cult says. No scripture supports this man made doctrine, not one. KJV onlyism is another gospel, and another gospel is the spirit of divination or witchcraft. That sums up the KJV only heresy completeley We do not have a perfect translation, no matter what you may say. So in spite of your delusions you do not have a perfect translation either. But we do have a perfect God and saviour who is the Lord Jesus Christ. I can come boldly to the throne of grace at any time, because of what Christ did for me on the cross. You are the one trusting in man and man made traditions. Exposing what a liar and hypocrite you truly are. I prefer to trust in the Lord. Meanwhile God is using and blessing these excellent modern translations to bring many to Christ. The angels of heaven are rejoicing over one sinner that repents. But the miserable idolatrous blasphemous KJV only cult. Calls these translations "perversions" "sataniic" . How can Satan cast out Satan. That is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. The KJV only cult is a cancer with no scriptural authority. A cult that has not only left honesty, truth and reasoning behind. But have left sanity behind.
@@exothermal.sprocketYou can't have a half accurate translation! So the KJV with the word unicorn nine times. Calling the Holy Spirit an it four times denying his deity. Mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover. Latin words like Lucifer taken from the Latin Vulgate. Not to mention the added uninspired verses Because the translators who knew their work was not perfect, used later manuscripts. That had added uninspired verses in them. Also the archaic English where so many words have changed meaning. Makes the KJV one of the most imperfect translations we have. We do have a perfect Saviour his name is Jesus. The perfect word made flesh. As for a "perfect translation of scripture" a total fallacy and deception from the KJV only cult. If there is a so called "perfect translation of scripture" then it is not in English. Certainly not the KJV despite the delusions of Sam Gipp. The KJV translators knew this so we're far more honest than the KJV only cult
Interesting. It's really not okay. Can two walk together unless they be agreed? And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel? It is not okay for a professing believer to be keeping pagan days. Forget those colored eggs and chocolate bunnies. If you walk with Christ, they are not for you. There is no compromise. What month did God command as the beginning of the year? Yet you keep a pagan calendar. Are you sitting in judgment of God? Does man know better? Are we to look like the world? No, Passover is not always April 14th. Biblical reckoning of the months is not the same as the Roman calendar. It is based on the phases of the moon. Passover is always the 14th day of Abib (which does not translate to April 14th). The beginning of the year also coincides with the barley being abib.
I have read much of Sam Gipp's so called answer book. A book full of double standards, circular reasoning, and much of the time nothing but lies . All to try to justify the KJV only heresy. A false teaching with no scriptural support or authority. His mental gymnastics to try and justify the mistranslation of Easter instead of Passover would be laughable. If it was not for the fact that it is so deceitful. But then the whole KJV only cult is deceitful
Excellent presentation! God bless you brother Gipp!
When are people going to realize that the Democrats and Republicans are on the same side? Both wings belong to the same bird. They are playing the hegelian dialectic ; Thesis, Antithesis, Synthesis. Problem, reaction, solution.
Birthdays are always on the same date, let's say for example,
February 12, but each year on that date it will fall on a different day of the week in order.
The bible used to say, "Passover" not Easter. It was changed.
Excellent work Sam, my only small contention, when Jesus was born CAN be determined by the courses of the priests, among other things, using only the Final authority, our KJB.
With that said, Christmas should also be avoided. It's tough, but we are told not to be friends of the world. After 30+ years of recognizing and celebrating it, I realized that it doesn't honour Christ at all.
Praise the the Lord
You are 100% right about that PAGAN CHRISTMAS
Praise the Lord Jesus
Blessings Gordon KJV
After all the good you did to explain the PAGAN EASTER
Astarte Ishta Acts 12 absolutely biblically brilliant
Then you Fall for the
PAGAN CHRISTMAS LIE
The queen of heaven the sungod
And Roman Catholicism that fixed the date
this is so sad we all were so
Shocked !!!
This is a very very sad day
😂😂😂😂😂😂📖📖
Nothing biblically brilliant about trying to justify the mistranslation of Easter instead of Passover. Another false teaching from a false teacher of the KJV only cult.
Is the King James Bible the only one to use Easter, No!
So how did the pre-king james bibles translations do? Lets look!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AD Bible Act 12/4 Easter? / Passover in N.T.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1382 Wickliffe N / All (Paske)
1525 Tyndale Y / N (all Easter)
1535 Coverdale Y / N (all Easter)
1537 Matthew Y / Both
1539 Cranmer / Great Y / Both
1539 Taverner's Y? / Both?? (revison of Matthew)
1557 Geneva (1557) Y / N (all Easter)
1568 Bishops Y / Both
1610 Douay-Rheims N / All (Pasch)
That's all 9 English Bibles that came out before the King James. We have
7 out of 9 use Easter in Acts 12/4,
3 out of 9 use Easter every time, and
4 out of 9 use bouth words.
The first one and the last tkae the word from the Greek
So is the KJV right?
To me this is about Herod and his tradition, To the Jews it's the days of unleavened bread, Herod is not a Jew, he is a pagan and would have followed the pagan traditions, and he (Herod) intending after Easter (his tradition) to bring him (Peter) forth to the people (Jews). To Herod it's the Easter time, to the Jews it's the passover time. As we have seen there can be up to a two week difference in the timing of Passover and Easter.
So I have no problem with the word Easter in Acts 12/4.
Uh, if the Bible is, as some claim, untrustworthy, then what do you use to correct false doctrine?
Bible verses?
Ostara is the pagan goddess of spring and associate with the hare, and also the dawn. Ishtar, Astarte, Isis are really all the same pagan fertility goddess with a different name or symbol depending on the region or era/timeframe. The same as the queen of heaven. It bugs me that Christendom celebrates this mingling of the holy with the profane...which is very displeasing to God. Obey and observe what He commanded with are His holy feasts. All of them are a depiction of the plan of deliverance, salvation and redemption.
Christmas likewise is a spurious counterfeit.
Problem is despite Sam Gipp's worship of the KJV. Easter is a mistranslation. Ezekiel 45 v 21 makes it clear that Passover is a feast of seven days. Herod nor Luke who wrote the book of Acts had ever heard of Easter. Herod wanted to please the Jews, that is why he was waiting till after Passover. Pascha always mean Passover. But obviously Sam Gipp has made an idol of the imperfect uninspired KJV. So he is under strong delusions, but that is true of all who have been deceived by the KJV only heresy.
Sam's worship of the KJV?
Let me ask you something: Do you worship God? You do? Then how do you know who God is? How do you know what constitutes worship? How do you know God accepts that worship?
Words are what every Saint for the last 2000 years is to live by. The words have total and final authority. So which Bible in your language is perfect? You don't think there is one? How can you be sure you're worshiping God?
@@exothermal.sprocket Jesus made it clear that those who worship God must worship him in"Spirit and in truth". As the apostle Paul said "I know whom I have believed" his name is Jesus. I know him as well my Lord and Saviour the risen Christ. Neither did I say I do not believe in a perfect Bible. But there is certainly no "perfect" translation . Even the KJV translators knew their work was not perfect. They said that even the meanest translation is still the word of God. The KJV only cult which I have no doubt Satan has raised up. In their delusions pride and arrogance think they know better than the KJV translators. I believe that all the promises of God are yes and amen in Christ Jesus. Do you? They are in all the excellent modern translations that God has blessed us with Do you worship the Lord or some archaic imperfect English translation called the KJV?
@@samlawrence2695 My point was, you have to believe in a perfect Bible or else all your supposed knowledge of anything of God has been delivered you by other men whom you have no business trusting, or your own heart and mind which are just as unreliable. God hasn't spoken out of the sky, flown an angel through your house, or put tingles down your spine. You must rely on written words or you have nothing whatsoever at all. Oral traditions are unreliable, all other forms of preservation of information God has rejected. It's the written words.
So either you have the perfectly preserved words of God in English, or you have nothing at all. So where are they? You can't have half-accurate, or mostly-accurate, or somewhat-deficient, because you cannot determine where the parts are that are supposedly deficient. If you can't trust the written words of God 100%, then you have no business at all trusting them 99%.
If you believe the original autographs were perfect and that's where it all ended, then you believe in something more important than what God thought of the originals; He had them copied and re-written almost immediately in some cases. Neither has there ever been a complete collection of original autographs of the scripture anywhere in the world in one time. Never existed.
How do I know these things? Besides all this clearly explained in the KJB, the data isn't hard to come by elsewhere.
In fact, there's more reliable proofs that the written scriptures are everything they claim to be, than we have of recent American historical events.
@@exothermal.sprocket Your point is that you have no idea what you are talking about. That you have fallen for the KJV only deception which is nothing more than a man made tradition. So you are trusting men rather than God. Therefore contradicting yourself and using the usual double standards of the KJV only cult. Also you are calling the KJV translators liars who said their work was not perfect. Just as false teacher and KJV only cultist Sam Gipp calls them liars. Sam Gipp of course represents the extreme lunatic fringe of the insane KJV only cult. He is the man who said a Russian must learn English to have the "true" word of God. Not any old English but the archaic English where so many words have changed meaning of the KJV. Making the KJV even more inaccurate. Also where was the so called "perfect word of God" before 1611? KJV only cultist and false teacher Sam Gipp could not answer that. Also which of the at least ten different revisions of the KJV, is the "true word of God"? 1611 with the apocrypha? 1769? Oxford edition? Cambridge edition! Why do members of the KJV only cult not speak in KJV English? Because nobody would understand them. Showing what a load of arrogant two faced hypocrites the KJV cultists are. Yet this idolatrous blasphemous KJV only cult try to confine Almighty God to some archaic imperfect uninspired translation called the KJV. There is no such thing as a perfect translation in any language no matter what the KJV only cult says. No scripture supports this man made doctrine, not one. KJV onlyism is another gospel, and another gospel is the spirit of divination or witchcraft. That sums up the KJV only heresy completeley We do not have a perfect translation, no matter what you may say. So in spite of your delusions you do not have a perfect translation either. But we do have a perfect God and saviour who is the Lord Jesus Christ. I can come boldly to the throne of grace at any time, because of what Christ did for me on the cross. You are the one trusting in man and man made traditions. Exposing what a liar and hypocrite you truly are. I prefer to trust in the Lord. Meanwhile God is using and blessing these excellent modern translations to bring many to Christ. The angels of heaven are rejoicing over one sinner that repents. But the miserable idolatrous blasphemous KJV only cult. Calls these translations "perversions" "sataniic" . How can Satan cast out Satan. That is blasphemy against the Holy Spirit. The KJV only cult is a cancer with no scriptural authority. A cult that has not only left honesty, truth and reasoning behind. But have left sanity behind.
@@exothermal.sprocketYou can't have a half accurate translation! So the KJV with the word unicorn nine times. Calling the Holy Spirit an it four times denying his deity. Mistranslations like Easter instead of Passover. Latin words like Lucifer taken from the Latin Vulgate. Not to mention the added uninspired verses Because the translators who knew their work was not perfect, used later manuscripts. That had added uninspired verses in them. Also the archaic English where so many words have changed meaning. Makes the KJV one of the most imperfect translations we have. We do have a perfect Saviour his name is Jesus. The perfect word made flesh. As for a "perfect translation of scripture" a total fallacy and deception from the KJV only cult. If there is a so called "perfect translation of scripture" then it is not in English. Certainly not the KJV despite the delusions of Sam Gipp. The KJV translators knew this so we're far more honest than the KJV only cult
u using wrong calender dr... hebrew calender an evening first... passover takes place between the evenings
Interesting. It's really not okay. Can two walk together unless they be agreed?
And what concord hath Christ with Belial? or what part hath he that believeth with an infidel?
It is not okay for a professing believer to be keeping pagan days. Forget those colored eggs and chocolate bunnies. If you walk with Christ, they are not for you. There is no compromise.
What month did God command as the beginning of the year? Yet you keep a pagan calendar. Are you sitting in judgment of God? Does man know better? Are we to look like the world?
No, Passover is not always April 14th. Biblical reckoning of the months is not the same as the Roman calendar. It is based on the phases of the moon. Passover is always the 14th day of Abib (which does not translate to April 14th). The beginning of the year also coincides with the barley being abib.
save some time? you just spent 20 minutes speaking about the wars
u have a degree
I have read much of Sam Gipp's so called answer book. A book full of double standards, circular reasoning, and much of the time nothing but lies . All to try to justify the KJV only heresy. A false teaching with no scriptural support or authority. His mental gymnastics to try and justify the mistranslation of Easter instead of Passover would be laughable. If it was not for the fact that it is so deceitful. But then the whole KJV only cult is deceitful