Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Kinetic Molecular Theory and the Ideal Gas Laws

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 сер 2024
  • I bet many of you think that the ideal gas law must prohibit passing gas on the elevator. That's a very good guideline, but there are other important laws we must know! Like Boyle's Law, Charles's Law, Avogadro's Law, and more! Let Professor Dave run you through the details.
    Watch the whole General Chemistry playlist: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    More AP Chemistry review materials from me: bit.ly/URPDave
    Organic Chemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Biochemistry Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Biology Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDaveBio
    Classical Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Modern Physics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    Mathematics Tutorials: bit.ly/ProfDave...
    EMAIL► ProfessorDaveExplains@gmail.com
    PATREON► / professordaveexplains
    Check out "Is This Wi-Fi Organic?", my book on disarming pseudoscience!
    Amazon: amzn.to/2HtNpVH
    Bookshop: bit.ly/39cKADM
    Barnes and Noble: bit.ly/3pUjmrn
    Book Depository: bit.ly/3aOVDlT

КОМЕНТАРІ • 414

  • @aadithyahrudhay2269
    @aadithyahrudhay2269 5 років тому +1197

    Better than Crash Course, if I may. Less drama, more facts delivered in a calm and composed manner.

    • @AS-mm4pn
      @AS-mm4pn 5 років тому +114

      I love both of these channels.Yeah there is much drama by Hank but information and its explanation isn't a dumb one because of that.

    • @yeltuazon213
      @yeltuazon213 5 років тому +6

      Legit

    • @Gomepez
      @Gomepez 5 років тому +20

      Aadithya Hrudhay hank makes me anxious

    • @samrashafaq1717
      @samrashafaq1717 4 роки тому +201

      You dont have to put down something just to appreciate some other thing! Professor Dave is awesome and so is Hank Green. They both have different styles of teaching. Prof. Dave teaches in a calm & composite manner. Hank teaches in a more fun & hands-on kinda manner. And I think both are amazing in their own unique ways.

    • @samrashafaq1717
      @samrashafaq1717 4 роки тому +7

      Composed* lol

  • @danielmejorado6098
    @danielmejorado6098 Рік тому +113

    I like the calm and concise delivery. No zany personality, no senseless entertainment gimmick. Just a solid breakdown of what, how, and why.
    Gracias.

  • @andynguyen6341
    @andynguyen6341 5 років тому +178

    Thank You for taking a 3hr lecture and compressing it into 5 mins! You're doing great Prof!

    • @mideafinni-jegede8829
      @mideafinni-jegede8829 5 років тому +2

      Yeah, but he's way too fast. Don't you think so?

    • @andynguyen6341
      @andynguyen6341 5 років тому +9

      @@mideafinni-jegede8829 Yeah, but its also a video... you could always go back.

    • @mideafinni-jegede8829
      @mideafinni-jegede8829 5 років тому +1

      Yeah i do.....Thanks for the reply.

    • @fansompualno1659
      @fansompualno1659 9 місяців тому

      @@andynguyen6341 absolutely agreed

    • @AngelEdward-cx6ht
      @AngelEdward-cx6ht 4 місяці тому

      This is brief nd very comprehensible ....but I think you must have studied to an extent to grab this real quick....a starter won't really get it

  • @SW-nx4jz
    @SW-nx4jz 4 роки тому +64

    This was explained exceptionally well! The visuals you provided along with the simple explanations made these formulas soooooo much easier to understand. Thanks You Professor Dave!

  • @SaeedNeamati
    @SaeedNeamati 3 роки тому +34

    you're a mother born teacher. Your teaching techniques easily stays above all other fancy channels. Please create more series. I'm watcging many of your series entirely.

  • @lenae4526
    @lenae4526 Рік тому +53

    Thank you science Jesus

  • @mothmansleftwing
    @mothmansleftwing 2 роки тому +14

    i’m refreshing up on my chemistry as i’m planning on taking it next year in college, but i haven’t actually done anything in over a year 1/2. your videos are amazing and they’re great for getting me back into it!

  • @giveyouthesun5220
    @giveyouthesun5220 4 роки тому +86

    thanks sir! i didn’t get it when my teacher told us about this but your short and to the point method really works for me :^D

  • @puspalatapani2152
    @puspalatapani2152 5 років тому +101

    What a teacher! Taught me something in 5 minutes which couldn't be explained by my school teacher in 1 hour! 😆😇😈

  • @emilelepape3144
    @emilelepape3144 2 роки тому +6

    I've never learned chemistry so efficiently. Your 5 min vid > a full lecture.

  • @ibmcool680
    @ibmcool680 6 років тому +11

    Professor never stop uploading videos... Because your videos are a big help... Thank you

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 років тому +20

      can't stop don't stop won't stop!

    • @ibmcool680
      @ibmcool680 6 років тому +1

      Professor Dave Explains hahaha you are the best professor, no lie 😁😂

  • @thedirtybubble9613
    @thedirtybubble9613 4 місяці тому +7

    I just farted and here I ended up at the Ideal gas law.

  • @coleentangballoony3262
    @coleentangballoony3262 4 роки тому +3

    Myghadddd U R AN ANGEL SENT FROM HEAVEN. WE HAVE A TRIMESTRAL EXAMINATION TOMORROW AND OUR TEACHER’S PPTs DOESN’T EVEN MAKE SENSE TO ME. BUT THEN I FOUND YOUR VIDEO AND FOR A SPAN OF 11 MINS (cause i watched 2) I UNDERSTOOD EVERYTHING RIGHT AWAY. YOU DESERVE A MILLION SUBSCRIBERS
    🙌🙌🙌

  • @None0fY0urConcern
    @None0fY0urConcern Рік тому +12

    Bro😂just explained the whole chapter in 5min

  • @sheppardscott13
    @sheppardscott13 5 місяців тому

    Currently enrolling in Canadian high school as an international student. My dream is to be a tutor like you in my country. You are truly an inspiring figure, Prof. Dave. Thanks for all the contents, I cannot thank you enough.

  • @AS-mm4pn
    @AS-mm4pn 5 років тому +67

    You look great just like a Chemistry Messiah.

    • @glennmnte9488
      @glennmnte9488 4 роки тому +5

      Just because the actor portraying Jesus in a movie looks like that, short hair with a beard and all, doesn't mean that's what Jesus really looks like. Only the people in his time on earth knows what he looks like lol.

    • @Morningstarintheroses
      @Morningstarintheroses 4 роки тому +2

      @@glennmnte9488 yeah 😄😄

    • @sibusisongele8719
      @sibusisongele8719 4 роки тому +1

      Doesn't mean He even exist😂

    • @snehayadav7208
      @snehayadav7208 3 роки тому +2

      @@glennmnte9488 If you don't know what the other person is exactly talking about then better not to comment. The word "Messiah" means - A leader regarded as the saviour of a particular country, group, or cause and here she is not referring to 'jesus'.

    • @nothankyou9733
      @nothankyou9733 3 роки тому

      Not look, he is

  • @mariamoine75
    @mariamoine75 7 років тому +9

    Dave you are literally saving my life THANK YOU

  • @rileycolvin947
    @rileycolvin947 5 років тому +8

    Another 5 minutes of pure genius.
    Thank you Professor Dave !

  • @peretzo
    @peretzo 4 роки тому +9

    i used to know this material when i was in university. Such a joy to have it all come back in a few minutes. And Prof. Dave is very easy on the eyes too. Love him

  • @j.s.r.slightningpiston5749
    @j.s.r.slightningpiston5749 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you, For your Precise Explanation Professor. Keep up the Good Work👏💖

  • @will9678
    @will9678 2 роки тому +2

    Wow for 5 minutes I've learnt more than my lecture notes, amazing.

  • @brad9343
    @brad9343 2 роки тому +2

    Professor Dave, I can't tell you how much your face on a UA-cam video gave me relief when I saw this in chemistry. As soon as I saw the intro I was like "Hey, isn't this the guy that completely destroyed flat Earth?" amazing. I just went back through my google classroom, and rewatching this is so much better than having to go back through all slideshows for everything. Thanks professor Dave for existing.

  • @angelooats3508
    @angelooats3508 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you so much Professor Dave! I had a hard time understanding our chemistry class and this video really helps me a lot😊

  • @russiandog0732
    @russiandog0732 2 роки тому +2

    I love your videos. Straight on point, simple and concise

  • @rohitbhapkar4352
    @rohitbhapkar4352 7 років тому +16

    thanks for the explanation bruhh!!!!!

  • @PentameronSV
    @PentameronSV 2 роки тому +2

    3:23 I still don't understand how the gas constant works.
    EDIT 1: I mistakenly thought that 'R' equals '0.0821 multiplied by whatever fraction shown on the right'.
    Am I correct in saying that the fraction at the end of the equation symbolises the many units for the number '0.0821'?
    Like, for example, the user can freely choose to use the unit 'L', making 'R = 0.0821L'?
    EDIT 2: Okay, I get it now. At 4:29, in the longest equation under the second question, the aforementioned units are necessary for the other units to cancel out in both the numerator and denominator of the fraction.
    To quote Professor Dave himself at 3:26, the gas constant (R) "makes these calculations intelligible in our man-made units."

  • @paoloresma4239
    @paoloresma4239 2 роки тому +2

    This guy is better than my physics teacher!
    What a lifesaver

  • @flowerfullgirl_
    @flowerfullgirl_ 5 років тому +4

    Why if you use the ideal gas law you get 13L and if you just use volume and moles (22,4 × 0.785) ÷ 1 = 17,6L?

    • @livingfaithsuan5084
      @livingfaithsuan5084 5 років тому +1

      Oskar Olszewski i don’t know if this could help but maybe bc the problem is not at STP? So maybe it’s not acceptable to assume that the volume and mole is 22.4L and 1mol, initially

  • @bartonpaullevenson3427
    @bartonpaullevenson3427 Рік тому +1

    As a planetary astronomer dealing with atmospheres, I'm much more comfortable using SI units, a weird unit we thought up for atmosphere chemistry called the kilomole (1 kmol = 1,000 mol), and an appropriately adjusted SI value of R (8,314.4598 J K^-1 kmol^-1). But I suppose if I had to deal with amounts of gas that could fit in vessels and tubes in a chem lab, I'd use the units you use here!😁

  • @user-abd_almer313
    @user-abd_almer313 Рік тому

    الغازات المثالية - مميزاتها :
    ١) الجسيمات في الغاز هي تقاط بلا أبعاد في حركة عشوائية .
    ٢) لا تتفاعل بغض النظر عن التصادمات فهي مثل كرات البلياردو .
    اربع اشياء للمناقشة
    ١) الضغط .
    ٢) درجة الحرارة ، ومدى سرعة حركتها ؟
    ٣) الحجم .
    ٤) المولات .
    كلما قلَّ الحجم ازداد الضغط ويمكن التعبير عنه بقانون بويل :
    P¹V¹=P²V²
    اي انه اذا انحفض أحدهما ارتفع الآخر .
    مثال القانون :
    1atm • 1L = 2atm • 0.5L
    اذا ازدادت درجة الحرارة ازداد الحجم .
    قانون تشارلز :
    V1\T1 = V2\T2 .
    1 كلفن= 1 درجة سيلزية
    K = C° + 273 للحصول على كلفن
    C = K° - 273 للحصول على درجة سيليزية
    قانون افاغاردو
    V1\N1=V2\N2
    قانون الغاز المثالي :
    PV = nRT
    R = ثابت الغاز
    R = 0.0821 • L•atm\mole•K .
    اذا قلنا ان درجة الحرارة 313k والحجم 2.3L والضغط 1.5atm .
    فإن القانون PV=nRT صالح للتنفيذ ، هكذا :
    نعوض
    (1.5atm)(2.3L)=n(0.0821•L•atm\mole•K)(313k)
    بإختصار الناتج : 0.13moles .
    اذا حصلت على ثلاثة متغيرات من أصل اربعة استخدم قانون الغاز المثالي واذا لم تحصل عليها استخدم القوانين القديمة :
    P1V1=P2V2
    V1\T1=V2\T2
    P1v1\T1=P2V2\T2

  • @rakalu9994
    @rakalu9994 7 років тому +3

    You explained this very visually and rationally. Thank you!

  • @ladyinred396
    @ladyinred396 7 років тому +1

    Can you please check am I right ( my answers are 1,3,4): For an ideal gas which of the following statements are correct:
    1. Increasing the temperature of a gas at a constant pressure increases its volume
    2. Increasing the pressure of a gas at a constant temperature increases its volume
    3.Increasing the temperature of a gas at constant volume increases its pressure
    4.At the same temperature and pressure one mole of helium gas occupies the same volume of one mole of argon gas
    5.The ideal gas law applies only to monoatomic gases.
    thank you :-)

  • @iyyikiolsem
    @iyyikiolsem 2 місяці тому

    Hey guys, I wanted to ask you something. I’m a foreign student and in my country we don’t use decimal numbers much. Instead, near whole numbers are given in the questions. therefore, we don’t need nor use calculators while solving questions. Given these circumstances, I realized I don’t really know how to do these calculations 🫠 I was wondering if the calculations in checking comprehension part require a calculator, or am I expected to be able to do the calculations without it? It’d be greatly appreciated if you could answer me 🫶🏻

  • @emilhales2705
    @emilhales2705 5 років тому +256

    who knew Jesus taught chemistry!!

    • @ECjj33
      @ECjj33 4 роки тому +17

      well Jesus is the author of life and kinda created chemistry, so He'd be the best teacher for it, right?

    • @beatsbyguillermo8802
      @beatsbyguillermo8802 4 роки тому +8

      @@ECjj33 I don't understand how one could adhere to science and believe in god/heaven/miracles at the same time

    • @ECjj33
      @ECjj33 4 роки тому +11

      BeatsByGuillermo well I believe that God’s creation is a big work of art, and the science of His creation is like the simple, yet extravagant detail (like shading, brushstrokes, etc. that one would see on a drawing or painting) that bring beauty and life to the bigger picture 😊

    • @jbuddyman
      @jbuddyman 3 роки тому +5

      He knows a lot about the science stuff, its professor jesus explains

    • @saransh255
      @saransh255 3 роки тому +1

      @@ECjj33 I might be wrong but isn't Jesus the son of God and god made chemistry and stuff in genesis. IDK i might be completely wrong

  • @calvinbafshoe2626
    @calvinbafshoe2626 Рік тому

    I must applaud you for explaining this in a very much simple manner. Thank you professor Dave!

  • @noobaccount7580
    @noobaccount7580 5 місяців тому

    Probably the best explanation of kinetic theory. Thanks prof!

  • @saisathvikkadimisetty774
    @saisathvikkadimisetty774 4 роки тому +2

    hey professor dave i guess u and ur team can start some kind of online courses.It would really be helful for us

  • @darkill725
    @darkill725 3 роки тому +1

    is anyone else confused about how to solve for the 4th variable when you have the other 3 . all the other values cancel eachother out and your left with 0.08206 times the value you need everytime. how are you suppose to solve these questions?

  • @kiddflxcko2439
    @kiddflxcko2439 2 місяці тому

    Prof is a blessing fr. The scientific saviour

  • @FriminaFaustine
    @FriminaFaustine 3 місяці тому

    That's alot you explained really nice and you made me understand without any hesitation.

  • @eilamitra8057
    @eilamitra8057 4 роки тому +2

    this video was insanely helpful

  • @geetikachauhan6437
    @geetikachauhan6437 6 років тому +1

    Amazing explanation

  • @incrediblethings11
    @incrediblethings11 8 років тому +2

    Sir Dave I love ur Explaining Style.. Awesome

  • @n.v.n.prasad132
    @n.v.n.prasad132 Рік тому

    These videos are beneficial for everyone in the internet, I applaud your efforts to educate people!
    I have one small question. How did scientists calculate the conversion between Kelvin and Celsius?

  • @keabetswekwenda5760
    @keabetswekwenda5760 Рік тому

    This is well explained and easy to understand thank you sir

  • @AngelEdward-cx6ht
    @AngelEdward-cx6ht 4 місяці тому

    Thank you professor Dave!😌
    I understood so well

  • @hashiroi6361
    @hashiroi6361 2 місяці тому

    straight to the point! everything is so clear. I m ur big fan

  • @bachairnoore7359
    @bachairnoore7359 4 роки тому +1

    thank you professor

  • @user-qb7km6nc8i
    @user-qb7km6nc8i Рік тому

    You explain things so easily and simply! Thanks for saving my chemistry grade :)

  • @Shafey1985
    @Shafey1985 3 роки тому

    the most simplified on youtube... short video and complete information

  • @RobertBedfordVEVO
    @RobertBedfordVEVO 7 років тому

    Can someone answer this please: I work in blown film extrusion and cannot answer this question. If you have a bubble which is 50microns thick with a constant volume of 10 litres on air inside, why is it when you increase your thickness to say 100 microns the with the same volume of air in the bubble, the bubble increases in size? What is the science behind this?. Its also worth noting in blown film, we have a frost-line which is the point where the polymer has solidified and no longer able to stretch/mold. So when we take the output up, the frostline increases under the same air conditions it's taking longer for the air to cool then polymer as its become thicker.

  • @maryamalsammarraie2390
    @maryamalsammarraie2390 2 місяці тому

    I can’t explain how easy and fast understanding this vedio

  • @rsmthegame7926
    @rsmthegame7926 4 роки тому

    Thank you so much sir . you delivered in a calm way.

  • @nightwing199
    @nightwing199 5 років тому +1

    Isnt the ‘R’ value 8.314??

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  5 років тому +1

      depends on the units. in the context of the ideal gas law we usually use this version.

  • @gabriels2395
    @gabriels2395 6 років тому +3

    Hi Professor! Thank you so much for your videos!!. I have a question. Is it possible to *increase the pressure* and at the same time *not to increase the temperature* as a result of this? I think about the diesel motors (for example) that use high pressure for diesel to ignite within the piston and cause the explosion, which I think is because the increase in pressure *heats* the diesel enough as for this to explode (the increase in pressure increases, *consequently,* the temperature).

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 років тому +5

      sure one can definitely keep temperature constant! compression will not always be accompanied by temperature increase. this is called an isothermal process.

    • @gabriels2395
      @gabriels2395 6 років тому

      thank you for replying professor! This is a bit counterintuitive to me though. I found something on Wikipedia _en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isothermal_process_
      _...Doing work on the gas increases the internal energy and will tend_
      _to increase the temperature..._
      it says (to me) that the increase in pressure increases the internal energy, which needs to leave the system for the temperature not to change (going to the environment as heat). So there is an increase in temperature just that the system makes up for this by releasing such heat. Is there any instance in which increase in pressure would not make us deal with heat production (for us not even to need to get rid of any produced heat?)

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 років тому +2

      yes that would be an adiabatic process! and in fact, boyle's law talks about pressure and volume changing with temperature remaining constant. so it's just about tweaking the parameters.

    • @gabriels2395
      @gabriels2395 6 років тому

      OK profesor!! Thank you for replying!

  • @sathwikaburra5782
    @sathwikaburra5782 Рік тому

    The way of your explanation is tooo good in one explanation I understand all the topic sir thank you very much for uploading this video in youtube I'm ur new subscriber you r explaining the whole topic in 5 min which my teacher explains in one hour once again thank u very much sir for uploading this video 👍🏾

  • @ugwuokechinedu8393
    @ugwuokechinedu8393 6 місяців тому

    Thank you sir.
    I now have an understanding on Gas😊

  • @dd...6827
    @dd...6827 10 місяців тому

    very good explanation

  • @ellaandaustin3451
    @ellaandaustin3451 Рік тому

    who else is watching tons of Professor Dave's videos morning before a test?

  • @livealifeyouwillremember5350
    @livealifeyouwillremember5350 3 роки тому +1

    when we apply PV=nRT prof? I misunderstood about its application

  • @display4759
    @display4759 2 роки тому

    best channel for high school science

  • @MrLeozeppelin
    @MrLeozeppelin 4 роки тому +4

    So that's where Charles Boyle from B99 comes from! Thank you professor

    • @diyaeldo2883
      @diyaeldo2883 3 роки тому

      I also always think when I'm studying this Lol 😂😂 just thought about it a sec ago 🤭

  • @karanraut4417
    @karanraut4417 6 років тому +4

    man you are doing perfectly, what you are supposed to.

  • @user-ch8ce4xd9o
    @user-ch8ce4xd9o 9 місяців тому

    Sir one question will arise here That how temperature will incresed with volume?

  • @Op_Psych
    @Op_Psych 9 місяців тому

    really interesting and easy to understand

  • @palaparthirajkumar4175
    @palaparthirajkumar4175 4 роки тому

    Ultimate clarity brother

  • @maxkade9133
    @maxkade9133 3 роки тому +1

    Can't believe I watch physics videos because I play a computer game where I do something that requires knowing of gas laws 😂
    Nice video btw, I looked for visualization of the gas behavior and this one was perfect.

  • @lenranamikaze416
    @lenranamikaze416 3 роки тому +1

    Wow! 1M subscriber congrats 🎊🎉

  • @angeliemaebonaobra4448
    @angeliemaebonaobra4448 7 років тому +1

    Professor Dave, you're the best. Thank you!

  • @hamsiniharikumar8681
    @hamsiniharikumar8681 7 років тому +8

    Professor, can you please upload a video on real gases..

  • @stellaeirene9182
    @stellaeirene9182 Рік тому

    This was taught very well, thx

  • @neilmeher
    @neilmeher 3 місяці тому

    sir what do you think about Charles's Law as it states that increase in volume does not decrease the density

  • @timdang7978
    @timdang7978 4 роки тому

    always find your videos easy to understand than any other's

  • @jdaizzy5570
    @jdaizzy5570 2 роки тому

    Thanks... This was amazing... I'm satisfied with ur teaching...... You're better than crash course

  • @wowitsshailesh3536
    @wowitsshailesh3536 3 роки тому

    Thank you. This was real helpful.

  • @cynthiamathius
    @cynthiamathius Рік тому

    Thank you Proff. You're a life saver

  • @bringbackmemesineurope1576
    @bringbackmemesineurope1576 3 роки тому

    when i watched crash course i was sure i was gonna have an especially hard time with this topic, but after watching ur video i feel way more confident about all this lol

  • @manasvi265
    @manasvi265 Рік тому

    hey dave thanks for making videos ....

  • @PROofHAPPYWHEELS
    @PROofHAPPYWHEELS 3 роки тому

    great vid , would love more comprehension questions.

  • @davegarces2100
    @davegarces2100 6 років тому

    You can see that when the balloon expand the molecules inside began to slow down it mean the temperature goes down so its inversely and not directly proportional

  • @SmugBab
    @SmugBab 7 місяців тому

    4:30
    Why does the constant (R) contain “L • atm/mol • k” and yet it’s not used for the calculation of pressure? (P)

  • @alpaslanarabaci311
    @alpaslanarabaci311 2 роки тому

    hello, how can we calculate the temperature dependent molecular weight change.

  • @suryaindian7445
    @suryaindian7445 3 роки тому

    Very nice teaching skils

  • @talfrynfio2880
    @talfrynfio2880 3 місяці тому

    much helpful thanks😄

  • @rekhashekar7193
    @rekhashekar7193 5 років тому

    Awesome and uis probably one of the best education channels

  • @omarjallow65
    @omarjallow65 5 років тому +1

    Professor you really made me understand this topic once again thank you for the wonderful work you are doing

  • @mbalenhlesanelisiwe4300
    @mbalenhlesanelisiwe4300 2 роки тому

    How did you calculate the number moles

  • @promptlylearn518
    @promptlylearn518 4 роки тому

    Sir, Very nice and clear explanation I have no doubts at all thankyou so much for this lesson.
    I'm B.sc Ist year student I haven't join any coaching for physics Sir, I beg to you... please make more about physics chapters plsss!!!!

  • @nadiakhan5658
    @nadiakhan5658 5 років тому +1

    Thank you so much sir

  • @ffswardofficial8339
    @ffswardofficial8339 2 роки тому

    Sir your teaching skills are better then best

  • @praneeth8142
    @praneeth8142 2 роки тому

    thank you

  • @robertholston4708
    @robertholston4708 8 місяців тому

    I swear that I learned far more from Deflategate than I did in school, at least high school and college combined.

  • @Ms777MIMI
    @Ms777MIMI 4 роки тому +1

    Could someone explain to me exactly how you get an answer of 13L for Comprehension Question 2? I can’t seem to find the right equation to figure out the value of V 😊

  • @nousername12345
    @nousername12345 6 років тому +1

    Love your work

  • @annaamoni4369
    @annaamoni4369 7 років тому

    sorry sir it's a question and I don't think I quoted it wrongly,"why greater value of n greater energy or greater distance means greater energy?it a qns from one of the text books.

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  7 років тому

      great question, and i will answer it in a modern physics clip i release next week! has to do with the number of wavelengths in the standing wave that represents the electron. also has to do with potential energy increasing with greater distance from the nucleus just like it does as a massive objects moves away from the earth.

    • @annaamoni4369
      @annaamoni4369 7 років тому

      I'll be glad for that sir

  • @umumuntuksemua9831
    @umumuntuksemua9831 3 роки тому

    Sir, your videos are used for our lecture! Thank you

  • @meraflormedina4218
    @meraflormedina4218 3 роки тому

    ow many moles of gas are in a 40-liter cylinder that exerts a pressure of 1.2 atm at 60°C?

  • @adolfogalicia9978
    @adolfogalicia9978 4 роки тому +18

    He build like Jesus. Thank you Jesus for showing me the way of chemistry

  • @xavierlongoria4562
    @xavierlongoria4562 3 роки тому

    good job

  • @chufuonlinestudy3074
    @chufuonlinestudy3074 6 років тому

    sorry sir can i help what are the essential features of kinetic theory of gas,and is any difference between the fundamental assumption of kinetic theory of gas and basic assumption of kinetic theory of gas

    • @ProfessorDaveExplains
      @ProfessorDaveExplains  6 років тому

      they're pretty much listed in here, it's the whole part where i say we assume they are dimensionless points, don't interact, elastic collisions, etc.