Why Does Russian Tor-M2 Play a Vital Role Alongside S-300 and S-400
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
- The skies above Ukraine have become a battleground for more than just soldiers and tanks. In this new era of aerial warfare, where drones buzz like angry hornets and helicopters dance on the edge of visibility, a silent hunter has emerged from the shadows of Russia's air defense network: the Tor-M2 or the SA-15 Gauntlet in NATO’s word.While the mighty S-300 and S-400, those titans of air defense, have dominated headlines with their stratospheric reach and ballistic missile-crushing capabilities, the Tor-M2, with its swift movements and low-altitude focus, has proven to be an unsung hero, leaving many wonderings why does Russia need this seemingly "lesser" system when it already possesses aerial giants?
Subscribe Now :
/ @military-tv - Наука та технологія
![ПОЛНАЯ ИСТОРИЯ ЭКЗОРЦИЗМА [Топ Сикрет]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/qBySr6Bt0B8/mqdefault.jpg)
the way it launches those rockets is so unique and cool
The russians call it the Dome. For good reason.
Cool Shovels powered by washing machine chips. IMPRESSIVE!
The tor was the soviet response to the apache helicopter
По итогам СВО в Сирии - Тор-М2 оказался самым результативным борцом с дронами.
@@alexandrnoskov5437 English!🫡
What about the AC-130?
@@hist8332 I guess that one as well. I read it was developed out of concern regarding American attack helicopters.
Thanks, didn’t know that. 🙂
Russia has both type systems because they don't need an elephant rifle to hunt squirrels.
Exectly 💯 Russia 🇷🇺 never lose @war
Russia is the best nation when it comes to manufacturing air defence platform
No dude..Russian electronic jamming is their biggest muscle in this war..we don't hear that a lot..but himars and western missiles are useless due to those jamming.
That's the best for sure
@AairaEril your both right
HIMARS is very efficient because Russia doesn’t have enough ew playforms@@AairaEril
It's good but not best. I used to think it was the best.
Russia used to gave a good pr for yheir systems . Now we all know its shit.
It's funny how Ukraine never reveal how many drones and planes are lost, they only report on how many Russian planes they shoot down.
yes yes and the battleship Moscow sank in a storm. Russia always publishes its losses absolutely honestly. Dream on.
Why would they? No country does that during war.
I am pretty sure US knows what they lost and this is the reason for abandoning them.
@@michaele8442 Russia battleship?? So now the media blows up a cruiser and then calls it a battleship. Maybe they will call a helicopter carrier an aircraft carrier next time.
why not pantsir s1?
F16 in big trouble hahaha
F16 potrafi świadomie używać pocisków przeciw radarowych zauważ że są zespolone radary z wieloma wyrzutniami w rosji.te samoloty co mają Ukraińcy wysyłają gdy dowiedzą się z innych źródeł.f 16 informuje pocisk że jest namierzany i gdzie wysłać. To będzie jak dobrze rozegrają rzeź systemów obronnych rosyjskich.
@@robertklimczak5630 English. We don't understand Polish.
@@fevidalause Translate. I suppose you want us all to use the US dollar too!
@@user-lp2ig7jl6y Ok so basically you're telling me that when I'll be in Poland instead of respecting their culture and giving a try to speak Polish, I would speak Russian. And your comparison doesn't really make sense. And you do realize that translate sometimes isn't really accurate?
Yes they will be shooting at a drone while the anti radiation missiles will take out the launcher's why do you think the Ukrainians want the F 16 for the isreali do it all the time in Syria
for heli, drone and jets that flying low.
Interesting perspective. 🧐
Song/music theme?
it is stupid question,why spend S300 or S400 on a cruize misals or drons when they have Tor M2 or BUK
This is called "integrated AA". Russia is the only country in the world having integrated AA.
Ukrainian air defences much better than Russian weapons
@@davidrickwood5588 wow 🤣🤣🤣
Anonimowych alkoholików. Faktycznie Rosjanie potrafią pic na śmierć
@davidrickwood5588 your sources please , 😂😂😂
@@davidrickwood5588 Именно поэтому ВС РФ уничтожили до 70% (по признанию украинских энергетиков) энергосистем украины ?)))
slava russia
The reason you have problems with destroying a S-300/400 and why you need a huge swarm of drones/ARM's to defeat it - Is in fact the Tor, that always escorts it. It can destroy those drones and ARM's before they hit the S-300/400 system. However the Tor tracked version is more used for escorting armored units on the battlefield. The Pantsir System is annother less armored system for short range object defense that includes very fast firing 30mm cannons for very short ranged engagements. I would not fly a Helicopter close to these. If they hide nicely and only use their optic and IR/thermal detection systems, you won't know what hit you. Not to mention the Tunguska...
Es Guerra Igualmente.
Silent but deadly.
Russians really like cold launch.
What about Pantsir
All that "capabilities" and yet we keep seeing Tor's getting fucked up by HIMARS while been observed by Drones on x and other social media platforms
Pantsir SM2???
Combination of ZSU-23-4 Shilka/2K22 Tunguska/9K33 Osa-10/ 2S38 'Derivaciya' PVO 57mm Self-Propelled Anti-Aircraft Gun (better than Flakpanzer Gepard) and the newest Pantsir System (12 missiles and two 30mm autocannons and 3 radar systems vs one Gepard has)!
btw Gepard and similar systems don't have missiles incorporated!
Russians have quantitatively and quantitively better systems!
Not to mention 9M32 STRELA-2/9K333 Verba shoulder-fired AA systems!
Plugged with A-50 (AWACS) and supported with hundreds of Su-30SM and Su-35 planes!
Not só bad for a coutry that they sad had old and bad wepeans. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Попробывать Америка на Россию😂
Don't know what you mean
A2AD at its finest
Very Briefed And summarized Ideas:
the system is excellent, but in the Ukrainian theater of operations, this system effectiveness remains limited by the topographical complicity in terms of the density of vegetation and the clutter it generat behind.
while In deserts and open areas, the system may demonstrate its tactical and operational preferences...
However, for the size of the system, the engagement envelope is considered small or limited, so I think it is appropriate for conducting:
1- the duty of point air defense where it's suitable for deployment in the vicinity of critical installations and high-value targets...
2- deploying in the vicinity of long range heavy air defense missile deployment sites such as S300/S400/S500 where the (tor system) benefit from the heavy air defense systems long-range radars and fire management systems with superior capabilities in enhancing the awareness and giving those sub-systems such as the (tor system) an advanced early warning capabilities, in addition to the capabilities of long range air defense systems in distributing and organizing the air defense tasks or missions between different sub-air defense systems, especially when they had to deal with threats within certain categories corresponding to the short & medium ranges air defense systems engagement envelopes or considered as lower priority threats, and by complementing and thus reducing the burden on the heavy air defense systems and prevent the exhaustion of their ammunition of shooting down less demanding aerial target's...
3- employing the features of the system’s high mobility and operational flexibility or speed of reaction time after stop to set up mobile ambushes for enemy air assets...
4- employing the advantages mentioned in the previous point of the system high mobility and operational flexibility in quickly closing any breaches that occur in the integrated air defense network in particular against low flying aerial monitions...
5- Keeping up with and escorting armored and mechanized formations, artillery and mlrs launchers formations and other high value ground forces assets when they are moving on the roads to protecting and defending them from the sudden air attacks, in addition to defending and protecting them on the battlefield from threats and air hostilities flying at low altitudes, especially attack helicopters such as the ah64 equipped with agm114 missiles with a range of 8 km and 11 km, depending on the altitude when launching the atgm missile, ground attack aircrafts, heavy mlrs launchers, and surface-to-surface ballistic missiles equipped with sub-munitions...
the (tor system) provides advanced performance indicators in confronting low-altitude aerial threats, such as attack helicopters equipped with guided munitions dating back to the last stages of the Cold War or the last quarter of the twentieth century, such as the agm114 and perhaps even the sgm65 Maverick when launched from low altitude...
but in the face of modern guided munitions, such as the antichrist Island brimstone air2ground missile with a ranges between 12km for the base model and 40km for the second generation (when launched from rotor wings) and the zionist entity’s aerospike missile, perhaps (tor system) can focus on trying to intercept these guided missiles instead of working on shooting down the aerail platforms carrying them...
I believe that the (tor system) provides capabilities that are commensurate with the needs of most countries in the world, especially what is known as the countries of the South, when the threats and hostilities that are supposed to encounter on the battle fields at its best dates back in their specifications and capabilities to the tactical and operational requirements of the late Cold War...
so between defending and protecting high value assets and escorting fighting formations on the battlefields, beside the scalability of the system (tor system) can fullfil the needs of most countries around the world...
Highly doubtful as missles and rockets not very accurate 😅
💪
Now u know why around 20 years ago iran bought many Tor-M2 from Russia
Хватит агрессировать на нашу страну, для нас, вы всего лишь малые области континента) почему бы нам не объединиться? Это наша часть суши! У нас есть всё)
Друзья, мы вводим на вооружение С-500) Сидите дома)
just a comment
korrekt, es lebe Russland !
I have no doubt the Russians have good equipment and it's all being tested but it seems these small drones are taking out equipment that cost tens of millions of dollars you will never beat a enemy of they can blow up equipment like this with a thousand dollar drone and their tanks would be better off . making the turret bigger and storing the ammo in it's own blast box get rid of the auto loader it's not the tanks it's the ammo in the metal coffins the Russian cosmaunauts are riding in I feel for these brave men on both sides
I keep seeing these videos. Yet Russia still hasn't won this war. All these weapons, yet no victory. It's a brutal bloody slog for em at this point. So i'm not seeing the point of these videos. Just not impressed with the Russian Military. Peace. 👊
Не тор м тю, а тор два М. Учите русский
Maybe it's effective against helicopters or so but I highly doubt that it can detect or shot down TB2s
Easy
It'd fucked up tb2
What was the last time you've heard of TB2s?
Where Tor-M2, the weather is non-flying for Tb2s.
Russian Tor M2 systems destroyed by Ukrainian forces
Tor? Bracia,dron wojskowy i himars i nie ma z tego nic. Tylko złom i kupka mięsa armatniego . Są filmiki jak drony wykrywają różne rosyjskie pracujące systemy które są niszczone przez himars albo jak bliżej przez działo z exkalibur.
@@robertklimczak5630 Вижу только кучу ржавого железа (как в начале видео) бывшего ранее техникой НАТО ))) Иди дальше смотреть телевизор)) Вероятно по ТВ украина уже Москву осаждает ?))
Russian propaganda
The TOR air defense system is designed to be a short range anti aircraft system and videos from Ukraine and Israel in Syria show it easily being destroyed by simple optically guided bombs and drones.
It seems this channel loves to glamorize Russian miltary technology, yet stuff has not made a difference in the war. The only thing Russia has been keeping Ukraine at bay with sheer number of conscripts in endless waves of attacks. This channel has turned into a Russian propaganda piece. I have lost interest.
Remember that Russia is fighting against 46 countries with all there military equipment are all in Ukraine so without such Russian equipment could have suffered worst casualties. Viva Russia
This feels less a one and a half year old nafo post
Alex your comment is simply wrong.
You are either a liar or a fool. Possibly both.
@alexincobra7379 YT creators get attacked and labeled proMoscow when they upload stories of NATO losses in the US Proxy War Against Russia. Predictable as the sun rising in the North.
He is in fine company with @HistoryLegends and @dpawar....
you prefer to watch KNG i believe 💀