What's The Future Of American Politics?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 12 сер 2023
- What is the future of American politics? The United States has under gone periods of political change and realignment creating 7 ages of American history, but now the U.S is preparing for its next great change. With the 2024 presidential election fast approaching, and likely pitting Donald Trump and Joe Biden up against each other in a rematch for the presidency, we have to ask ourselves which way is America going? Who will win? Will the next few years see American politics dominated by the Republican party or the Democrat party? And what exactly will be the defining ideology of either party? The political parties of the U.S are, of course, not monolithic, but coalitions of various factions, and it's clear to see that new factions are slowly taking over both parties, but the democratic and republican parties of the future may have more in common than they think, as with every era of American politics, more than party dominance, there is ideological dominance, the influence of an ideology across both parties with slight variations. What exactly will be this new unifying ideology for the American left and right in the next few years?
🕓New alternate history videos every weekend.
🪶Support Us On Patreon: / membership
⚡Support Us On UTREON: utreon.com/c/monsieurz
🎖️Become A Channel Member:
/ @monsieurdean
👕 Merchandise: us-of-z-shop.creator-spring.com/
📘 Our Flags: / 100086678611994
✴️ Fan Reddit: / mrz_official
📷 Instagram: / deanmonsieur
#2024elections #americanhistory #americanpolitics
Hopefully, the Empire of Z rises out of America soon!
Hahah;
I think people would confuse him as a Russian imperialist.
@@yanx4797 if "Russian imperialism" will guarantee that CPS doesn't take away my children because I refuse to castrate them or teach them that their ancestors are evil, then by all means I hope that Putin puts his feet up on the desk in the Oval Office 😊
Know why they're called gen z?
because of how much Adderall their doctor prescribes.
The Gen Z empire would last probably a few Months
SLAVA Z 🇷🇺🇺🇸💪💪
Once you remove citizenship as a requirement for participation in governance you have lost what it means to be a nation in the first place.
In California illegals when applying for a drivers license are automatically registered as a Democrat.
@@irishseven100Where'd you hear that?
@@icantcomeupwithnames469 Are y ou pretending they dont?
@@guillermoelninoWhere's any indication that's happening?
@@icantcomeupwithnames469California, New York, Washington, Oregon
We can never truly speculate how "Republican" or "Democrat" the future USA will be because the definitions, ideologies, and perceptions of what "Republicanism" and "Democracy" mean will change in the coming years, as they always have. Perhaps a better question: how culturally conservative or progressive, how economically capitalist or socialist, or how governmentally authoritarian or libertarian will the USA become? They're three separate questions because they really require three separate answers.
Eh republicans will always be death cultists for me
Best response
I believe the U.S. will move nationalistic and Capitalist. But their will be social areas.
@@soybasedjeremy3653How is that when the values of our youth are almost certainly liberal?
My opinion if a reformist nationalist faction be it Republicans or Third Party takes control, mostly prosperous domestic future. But greatly diminished global power projection ability as reasonable trade off.
Meanwhile if an establishment backed “woke” or residual neoliberal ideology infused Democratic Party faction wins. No likelihood of meaningful reform neither economically nor politically. As the current Democratic Party is inherently hostile to reform in a manner similar to the late Soviet hardliners under Gorbachev. Best case scenario America splinters into semiautonomous and moderately stable/cooperative successor countries after a prolonged period of instability and interstate wars of succession. Worst case scenario it becomes a backwards third world dictatorship bordering on increasingly more totalitarian rule.
Either way both situations still result in the official death of the Pax Americana no matter what! That’s my prediction.
Would call the new age "the populist age" due to control of both parties moving over to the more populist wings...
That's not necessarily a bad thing. Because so far, the migrants from Latin America are starting to be more like colonizers than migrants.
Also, so far globalist policies so far has only benefited others.
Then you have the economy which sucks right now do to terrible policy decisions.
And plus everything that guy pointed out.
Well control of both parties isn’t really true. Control of neither party is moving that way. With the Republican Party you could argue it’s moving that way as the populist wing has real influence and a few leadership positions in committees but in the actual leadership or in the senate there’s very little of it. It’s the base that is fully populist. But for the dems, their progressives have nothing.
@@igkslife Read a history book.
@@gamervox1707 I have. I've also seen the documentaries. It's only a terrible idea when people like Hitler does it.
However! If you minus genocide, and eugenics. Then it's not that bad.
Take the native Americans for example, if they focus on increasing their population. That wouldn't be a bad thing.
However the best way to do this is to allow immigration from other tribes, and remove any population control measures. Like condoms, birth control pills, and abortions.
Create a environment that promotes, and support the family, and the family order.
Most importantly put tribal lands above all else. Maybe even buy out the surrounding properties to expand their territories without blood shed.
Play their cards right, and they will no longer be a minority on their own land.
Do it wrong, and problems will occur.
@@igkslifemost of the places Mexicans are moving to used to be part of the Mexican empire lol. Reconqusita.
Being a Citizen to Vote.
sounds like the single most realistic thing EVER.
Then what about crazy people? Or Kids?
Basically everyone agrees with this. It's just that democrat voters have been convinced that voter ID would make it so that a bunch of poor people and minorities won't be able to vote.
@@matheuspinho4987Well, there's an age limit. Plus, the truly crazy barely vote and if they do, they're too rare to have any real impact.
Where can you not be a citizen and vote for a federal office?
@@SkittaruSan Francisco
Allowing non-citizens to vote is absolutely unacceptable. Some of the other actions taken to expand voting are also inherently anti-American.
What other actions?
@@deeznutz32108ballot harvesting, no voter ID, refusal to prosecute blatant cases of mail in ballot stuffing, districts turning in more votes than they have legally permitted voters on the registry or living in the district, etc
@@deeznutz32108there’s been a subtle push to lower the voting age to 16 for the past decade or so, multi-day voting and effortless (e.g. online) voting are also hot button issues gaining ground.
@@deeznutz32108 Are you being disingenuous or sarcastic? This has been discussed in mainstream news for years. Democrats aren’t even pretending to think there is anything wrong with non-legal “residents” as they call them voting in local elections.
@@jeffreywoods4040 I know the issues, just wanted to know what was anti-American about expanding voting rights.
As a libertarian, I'm puzzled by the talk of "democratization". Yes, the facts you stated are correct. The vote has expanded to almost everybody. But ballot access is still greatly restricted. It is still quite difficult for independents and third parties to get on the ballot without massive amounts of money. So what does it matter if you have the "right" to vote, if you still cannot vote for the candidate of your choice? Controlling ballot access is more powerful than having the vote.
Of course, things get really bizarre when the party leadership lose control over their parties. Being a Democrat or Republican means less now than it used to, and it matters more which specific candidate you support. Bernie or Hillary? Trump or Rand Paul? The Duopoly has failed to maintain control, but it has still resulted in significant numbers of Americans being effectively disenfranchised because they cannot vote for the candidates of their choice.
Here in europe there is a rapid rise in nationalsocialism. But we have these niche parties, maybe the US needs a system like that. Not a 2 party system but basically all the popular parties like in my country of the netherlands we have at the moment the choice between 28 parties and over 100 candidates...
We need ranked choice voting. I too am sick and tired of only having what boils down to 2 candidates to vote for. And the candidate that I'd like to vote for having little to no chance at all. Until we get ranked choice voting all voting is rigged as far as I'm concerned.
@@henkschrader4513 I believe some European countries have *proportional representation,* which allows greater representation for minority views in the government, unlike the U.S.'s 'winner takes all' system.
The 2 parties are big tent and need to be broad to include as many people as possible to to win. This idea that Europe’s multiparty system is better is nonsense as the parties need to reach out and form coalitions to govern anyway.
@@thetapheonix As a libertarian anarchocapitalist, my other option is no government, or at least as little government as possible. Then it becomes much less important which party is in power. But that's whole 'nuther argument altogether.
Whoever drives down the cost of living and leaves me the hell alone has got my full support.
Believing anyone can be left alone when they’re supposed to be part of a community in a single federal nation is an idiotic notion that got us in this mess in the first place by making us complacent.
"For to one accoustumed to the enjoyment of liberty, the slightest chains feel heavy" - Machiavelli
The form of ‘liberty’ implied in that quote is anarchical, and any who wish to indulge in it chain themselves to chaos
Florida also has a large Hispanic population, but there they favor the Republicans, they are mostly Cubans exiles and their decendentes.
Thanks to a Republican ad campaign they tricked the Hispanics of Florida to vote for them because Democrats 'promote communist ideology'
@@scottanos9981 yeah that is a new phenomenon that will keep Florida red thankfully, but we are heading towards a neo-progressive era, I even heard a boomer say that Bernie Sanders will win but without being president. I just can't see Trump winning Ron de Santis is better because he has fewer skeletons in the closet. The Republican should be crushing I keep thinking how John Fetterman was able to win? Signs things aren't going well.
Yeah, Z also didn't point out that people leaving California for Texas and other red states are voting more Republican than the native population. Most dems leaving Cali are going to other blue states like Colorado, Washington, and Oregon.
@@peterroberts4415
Colorado is NOT a blue State. We are blue on a map because of Denver, Boulder, and Fort Collins. The majority of our counties are red.
@@jfangmalmost every state is like that, even California
Congratulations on completing your 7 Ages of America series, Mr. Z!
Lincoln we need you
@@anthroimperzia3927no
Look what you did to this country
The trends are increasingly becoming the rulers vs the ruled. And it doesn't matter what political party you're affiliated with. The rulers want total control.
The rulers at the moment are the 5th wave feminist, the LGBTQ community and socialists/(neo)communism... but soon this will change
Yes, that is the GLOBALIST AGENDA
This is true.
It has always been that way. Elitism will always reign supreme at the end of the day.
And their useful idiots on the social radical left.
Fair and free elections are a hallmark for a constitutional republic. That's what America needs.
Sadly historically democracies fail without a wide encompassing middle class….which is disappearing fast in this country. The class divide is pulling our government apart more than political division.
Same force
We've had them since 1797. It's ludicrous to assert that in the past no one could have switched horses on the way to DC. They didn't because this is our most sacred institution. The vote is off-limits. It is what sets America apart. We RESPECT the American vote. We have FAITH in Democracy. Anyone who says voting is vulnerable to cheating needs to try to cheat and get federal time for their troubles. Do you want some names of some Republicans that have learned that lies can frequently result in jail time when you actually believe your lies? These other liars that try to erode our country from the inside without actually acting on their words (because lying through their teeth) are the most dangerous threat to our country. They make regular normal people like YOU think that VOTING is the PROBLEM. What, pray tell, do you think an alternative to voting would look like? ITS NOT YOU VOTING THATS FOR SURE.
Stop spreading their bullshit. Or act on it and go to prison forever.
Democracy is stupid.
@@darthdank1993
The middle class is disappearing because more and more are moving into the upper class. Meanwhile, minimum wage laws are eradicating any chance of the working class moving up.
National-populism maybe? Socially center-right and fiscally center-left. The exact opposite of neo-liberalism.
MAGA COMMUNISM LET'S GO
Given that a couple of studies are showing that younger people are leaning conservative compared to previous generations, I could see that happening
Not necessarily, because right wingers are for "personal responsibility" and low taxes it is still economically liberal
Gen Alpha is the first majority non-white generation in America the country won't be the same in 50 years it's being "recolonised" in the same sense south africa and rhodesia were/are. Eventually you'll have "kill the white farmer" chants just like in SA.
@@MrHellknightimp
A national call for socialism :^)
American politics for the next couple years is, in my opinion, going to be a lot of people who can survive in the new way information is widely available, and those who can’t. If you didn’t have a smartphone by 2014, you are so far behind in tech knowledge it’s terrifying.
People still need help cleaning their computer of viruses from younger family members, and it’s those same inept with tech people expected to make policy for a country that desperately needs to make tech more than just Silicon Valley style capitalism.
When AI is potentially threatening to politics because of stuff like deepfakes not even 3 years into the decade, there’s going to be a massive change in how people discern between real and fake information in ways none of our ancestors ever had to do. Not everyone will be able to make that switch though, and it’s especially obvious seeing people 65+ on either side of the American political divide. They’re some of the most unpopular but long serving politicians. DeSantis and AOC aren’t popular the way Trump and Biden are, but they know how to actually address modern fake news in ways older politicians either don’t or think pushing more of it is a good thing for everyone in the long run (it isn’t).
Tax and regulate the bots. 😄
I've always been tech savvy, and I didn't have a smartphone back then, because I couldn't justify the expenditure. I've kept up. Actually, it seems like tech is falling behind. I had to look up 1080GTX benchmarks, because I couldn't believe such an old card is still holding position near the top of the charts. Moore's Law is either on a very long hiatus, or it is over.
I've very much been enjoying this series, but highly disagree with many of the points. I won't go into detail on them, I'll just say that it is a big mistake to blindly assume social and political trends today will simply continue on forever.
I truly do hope that in their attempt to push social justice to a radical new level, the progressives end up overstretching which in turn leads to people being radicalized against them, but we’ll just have to see.
Right exactly, there are many things that can change the scenario. Who knows the GOP might change its policies and have a new “southern strategy” that caters to white working class voters and hispanics and blacks which is more center left.
@@Ace-uc5cj The GOP might ? When ? in 100 years ? With the rise of MTG, boebert, Gaetz and all the other far right lunatics, ain't no going back. Sane republicans are almost all gone.
That’s the thing, this video is taking into account the change from the prior neoliberal era. This is uncertain for sure, but the times are a-changing. The only thing I’m not so sure on is a domestic focus from the democrats. I still hear tell of interventionists on their side, wanting to do the democracy forever wars, but it’s entirely possible that this wing of the democrats gets thrown aside and they focus on the USA more
@@olhickory9815the democracy forever wars is just imperialism. War driven by capital. They aren't trying to democratize the world. If they were they wouldn't have installed and supported dictators in developing nations for the past several decades. The government isn't ideologically driven. Their ideology and actions are driven by material interests (money, preservation of power and status). That is why both the left and right find the situation very irritating, but only the far left fully understands the relationship between economics and the state. The state exists for the preservation of those with status and power.
Democratization and Liberalism are two very different things, and the Right needs to realize this and fight this false equivalency tooth and nail. A democratized entity is neither liberal or illiberal until they vote in favor of one or the other. The only truly liberal safeguard is a constitution that strongly defends individual rights, otherwise a democracy will gladly vote their liberal/free individual rights away, or vote in executive and judicial entities that will subvert a weak constitution to misinterpret their rights.
Seems like the left needs to figure this out first. “Democratization” is their whole thing. They can only win elections by importing people both legally and illegally.
The republicans have realized this since they are banging the drum of freedom if speech and also pointing out how gun control is unconstitutional.
It's the public that needs to actually learn this since the snakes on the left named their party democratic in order to confuse us (and in reality they are the complete opposite of democratic, seeing as they were in charge and pushing for the jim crow laws).
we are a republic
i was born with my rights. endowed upon me by my creator. any infringement will be met with overwhelming firepower. if the government comes for me i will ensure every inch will be hell.
@@dr.floridaman4805
I mean if the left wins you will need to use overwhelming firepower. The Democrats have used every line of the constitution to subvert human rights by infringing on the rights of men in favor of women and on the rights of white people in favour of minorities.
Affirmative action is litterally an infringement upon human rights since it discriminates against whites and asians by giving blacks and hispanics privileges (thankfully the supreme court overturned it).
That theory has been the dominant one for decades, and look how well it's worked! No, American conservatives and libertarians need to realise their idea of individual rights being the only thing the government should protect is exactly what is allowing the massive cultural shift of the last few decades to happen.
i really respect that despite his own political opinions, Z is able to be neutral in his predictions and say what he thinks is most likely to happen, even if it is against his personal desires.
Or is he trying to prove he isn’t “far right” as he was surprised to be labelled as?
@@rosscalverleyonly the people who are on the far left will see Z as "far-right".
@@rosscalverley
Only people on the far left are affraid of the "far right".
All who shout far right are communists and marxists.
What even are Z’s political opinions? He seems mildly conservative at most
@@dylanbuchanan6511
He is center right.
What we need is a ban on politicians serving past the retirement age. Old enough to collect social security? Go do that and stop messing up the country with your senility. An unsettling number of politicians [and presidential candidates] have been alive longer than Alaska and Hawaii have been states.
How does an age cap do anything for anyone? Can you be rational for a second and not use oversimplified takes from current news? Constituents have voted these people, and voters tend to be Old White Men. An age cap will never pass for good reason and it's stupid to even think it will do anything. Younger men and women should go vote for younger politicians. If you aren't voting for young people, then stop complaining that old motherfuckers like Joe Biden, Donald Trump, and Mitch McConnel get voted into power.
No, as not everyone elderly doesn't have dementia, but also that would limit what qualifies a president as already you have to be at least in your mid forties to be president. It may also force a president to not run a second term because they may be too old to qualify. I mean Ronald Reagan was ancient yet he was a good president.
In Canada you can’t serve in Parliament once you turn 75. I think that is very reasonable and needs to happen in the US.
@@michaelfoulkes9502 that is a start.
@aidenfarr8900 i personally think no politicians should be allowed to run for any office, even the one they currently hold, while in an office. Your term should have to end and you run as a civilian.
This would replace arbitrary term limits and prevent politicians from wasting public time campaigning (especially representatives, who campaign for up to half their term) instead of false promises, they run on what they did last time.
With the declining quality of American life, inflation, high living costs, social and economic inequalities, we are in a pretty bad spot. The situation resembles the turn of the century america or Weimar germany. With that I expect america will go one of several ways, as follows:
1. We Get a Theodore Roosevelt style progressive who will roll back the declining quality of life in the nation.
2. The far right to take control of the country.
3. The far-left to take control of the country.
4. America could break up into multiple smaller nations each with their own ideologies ranging from far-left to far-right, and everything in-between.
Of course, I believe the first option is the most likely, but, I never know.
The only "rolling back of the decline in quality of life" in this nation, for decades, was pre-Covid Donald Trump era. A mini golden age, and a shame it was stolen from us.
We could stop it if we crowd fund corpse reanimator and revive teddy he can still run for president considering it will be new life . 10/10 plan
I believe the problems are beyond simply returning to Teddy-style conservatism. I believe that depending on the order of events, the others are most likely.
If a big war begins first, we will begin fragmenting rapidly or the far left will seize control, as the draft would necessitate every fighting age make report. There’s not enough zoomer men to fill the gap. And many aren’t loyal to liberalism.
If a prolonged economic depression strikes quickly, the far right will take control.
I'm for number 4 because that's technically what we were as a Republic before the Civil War.
I thought you meant FDR for a minute and was confused lol
I’ve really enjoyed this series and am very glad that you made it. Good to know I’m not the only one thinking this way
The trends are whatever the song “rich men north of Richmond” speak too. That’s the future of U.S. politics and history.
That song sucks
But that theme takes on a new dimension in an America where even "the poor" are living relatively comfortably. Today's lower-class Americans aren't starving; they're overweight from eating too much McDonald's - a restaurant that has successfully spread where many grocery stores can't go.
Honestly, I just want the shouting to stop. I want to be able to discuss politics with other people without being plastered with campaign phrases or insults. The current situation prevents politically interested people from engaging, because there is nothing to engage with.
Exactly. I rarely discuss politics since 2016, because no matter how neutral or un-biased I am, there is just too much underlying hostility making rational communication impossible.
That's never coming back
The main problem is that we can't stop conflating social issues with cultural issues - and, indeed, the two terms have become interchangeable. So every fad or form of entertainment now poses an alleged threat to civilization. It's the McCarthy era all over again.
Update Americans will get more anti immigration given the mayor of NYC complaining about the cost of immigration and mass backlash in Chicago against mass immigration in mostly black communities.
Maybe it's a mistake to view this so much through political parties. There are some issues of growing importance like housing where it crosses party lines and you get the NIMBYs vs YIMBYs instead of R vs D.
It seems the changing times may cause a major realignment.
I think, while this does paint a pretty decent picture of how the democratic and republican parties are shifting, it ignores the major disagreements that young people have with both parties. Especially outside of cities, most people hate government in general and there is a shift toward libertarian ideals, much like the mid 20th century. The libertarian party is the largest third party and is seeing a lot of growth as people get fed up with both parties.
Im unsure on its long term power, but I see a moderate party forming, either out of one of the old parties, or through the libertarian party.
Libertarians are just as bad my dude
As someone who had been a Libertarian most of my adult life until the last 2 years let me just say the Libertarian party is losing alot of people to conservatism and even MAGA
This analysis ignores the elephant in the room. The debt. Both of these parties are busy running up national debt to such unprecedented levels that nobody knows what the result will be. But if the past is any guide, a nation or empire that inflated its currency always comes to a bad end. An economic disaster brought on by government default or draconian austerity may bring down Republican government. When people don't have food, they will accept tyranny in exchange for the basics of life.
@@thomaskaplan4898 "People who're hungry and out of a job are the stuff of which dictatorships are made" ~ FDR
I've voted libertarian for, what, about 20 years. But where I live it's more of a meaningless protest vote than anything. The role I see for libertarians is to become spoilers. To get to a point where to get the libertarian faction vote the major parties have to adopt some more libertarian policies. I don't see them winning any significant number of elections for the foreseeable future. And I'm fine with that, they're as big a bunch of loons as the Dems and the Repubs. This country has always worked best when there's a balance of ideas and there is give and take required to move forward. Right now there's no give, no take, and no movement.
Don't think bigger government will be the future. The government has been growing causing an unsustainable debt crisis which will collapse the bond market in less than twenty years.
The nation is falling apart. Its truly sad to be an American, a veteran watching powerlessly as our nation is crumbling.
The nation is doing better than ever so wym?
@@ryanmccartan7445My what metrics is our nation 'doing better than ever?'
@@cptndunsel2670 what's a 'metric'?
Speak American. Use feet if necessary.
@@cptndunsel2670 Lowest Unemployment in decades, largest infrastructure investment in the countries history, record job satisfaction, extremely fast GDP growth, Record numbers in the stock market, high approval rating around the globe, highest level of oil drilling in Americas history, and extreme progression towards a green future
@@ryanmccartan7445
No, unemployment is NOT the lowest ever. That happend pre-COVID as a result of Trump's economic policies. What we wre seeing now is merely us recovering from Democrat tyranny during the pandemic. The infrastructure "investment" was just pork that won't actually go to improving infrastructure - which wasn't actually an issue and would have been a State matter if it was. The stock market has been unstable since the lockdowns, and the GDP growth is just the post-COVID recovery. Also, "extreme progression towards a green future" means extreme progression towards rolling blackouts and breadlines.
I hope you’re having a good day Mr. Z
What’s interesting is, based on your definition of democratization, it reminds me of how Lenin envisioned the state disappearing as democratization took hold…. Make of that what you will
“They’re not sending their best folks. They’re not sending their best. They’re not sending you”…”they’re being drugs, they’re bringing crime, they’re rapists, and some, I assume are good people”
I like to think what the progressives are looking for is modeled after the Nordic "Grand Compromise".
late-stage socialist USA? lmao
Lenin never envisioned that. He was a communist, the ideology that has worked perfectly in every implementation. Not because it created a better life for its citizens, but because it destroyed the country it ruled over.
@@NY_Mapper I may have been thinking of Marx, but this was a belief in communism, that once the means of production were properly distributed globally, the state would lose its usefulness and would dissolve.
Since the ideology was nonsense from the beginning, the opposite happened and the state's power grew to maintain this artificial "democracy"
In autumn 2019 a certain spreadsheet-loving English newspaper published a pair of polls showing Republican support was down from 52 to 48% among nonHispanic white Americans since 2016, but had gone up by 50% among nonHispanic black and Hispanic Americans and doubled among nonHispanic nonwhite nonblack Americans, to the point that they tended to be Republican supporters at margins exceeding nonHispanic white Americans. That however was before pandemic.
Yeah sure source?
@@ebrimajallow9631 I haven't had JSTOR access in a while, so no can do, but it's in the The Americas section of one of eight issues of The Economist published between back to school and Hallowe'en of 2019.
I mean lower part of Texas which used to be democratic belts as most texanos and Mexican Americans used to vote exclusively for demos until it shifted to red region as many Hispanics don't trust democrats anymore same for Florida Spanish speakers ofcourse in California or Arizona like states it's not happening so it's probably depends on state by state
What is non Hispanic white? Is that just white?
A move from 1% to 2% is a hundred percent increase in support. You are mixing types of statistics, you gave us one example of overall support followed by two examples without it. Thus the drawing anything from it is potentially misleading as the necessary context wasn't provided.
If you ran for president, I would vote for you.
don't give him ideas that just means 4-8 years without videoss
@@randomguy6152 there would be videos. The news will provide him a larger plat form to work with.
In fact I think it would benefit him greatly as a UA-camr if he became president. Not only that, but imagine the policies that he would create.
I don't see a problem with it.
@@igkslifeWhat are those policies?
@@bulkierwriter2772 I don't know, monsieur z hasn't listed them yet, but if I had to guess?
American first policies that probably would prevent the centralization of power. Because he knows what a slippery slope it is.
However, like I said, I don't know because he hasn't said what his personal policies would be.
@@igkslifeIf the state becomes weaker I'm not interested, if it divides North America further and doesn't promote the integration of 🇺🇸🇲🇽🇨🇦🇵🇷 into one nation I'm not interested, if it doesn't promote the colonization of Africa I'm not interested.
If I’m being honest, who knows which way we’ll go…
I can definitely see a form of “ideological shift” where right wing idea today could be seen as left wing and vice-versa. (Much like how feminism went from a far-right idea in the early 1900s to a far-left idea in the 1960s)
But in the short term I believe there will be one last push left, before the pendulum swings back to the right.
The pendulum swing is not an accurate representation of politics throughout history is the problem.
nope we already moved to far right that moving left is the only way we keeping being.
Politically-speaking, the pendulum is moreso human nature to hate whoever is in charge eventually, usually in one or two election cycles. The fact that the pendulum is “stuck” in the “left” setting despite failures from both sides is quite peculiar. It shows something needs to change.
@@gamervox1707We’ve moved far right? Where, when, who?
@@gamervox1707 What part of uncontrolled immigration, of kids being given hormones without parental consent or knowledge, of public schools teaching kids about white privilege and patriarchy instead of civics and how to do taxes, of conservative viewpoints being censored online while porn runs rampant, what fucking part of that is far right?
The future is hard to predict, but, based on my observations, it’s looking more like there will be a significant increase in internal unrest on-par with the end of the Jacksonian Era and the beginning of the American Civil War.
i don’t think a civil war the way you think. It’s probably an internal civil insurgency by different groups and also political violence we’ve never seen but at the same time people in parts of the country living normal going to work. And probably a conservative candidate changing América, who knows I might be wrong
And Weimar Germany.
Terrible economy? Check.(This one is a given)
Degeneracy in the streets? Check.(Folsom street fair)
Pedo apologists? Check.(Gavin Newsom's SB-145 makes it so you don't have to register as a sex offender if you molest someone only 9 years under you)
The majority of Jews making six figure salaries? Cheeeeeeeck!(pew research)
Now call me an anti-Semite for stating facts.
No Americans are not fighting pitched battles and committing out right terrorist attacks against each other like you saw during bleeding kansas for example
@@danporter1176, *yet.
@@danporter1176 Antifa commits plenty of terror attacks.
Amazing video as always! This american series was amazing!
What if charles II of spain had a healthy son?
Honestly, its the same cycle over the last 160 or so years. Large swings back & forth between the 2 primary parties. And yet very few wake up to this.
Why the use of so much AI art for your stills. Lowered the quality of the video slightly for me.
Latino here, my family is definitely more conservative than many Latinos (were Cuban), but I live in a Midwest city where the dominant Hispanic group is Mexican. Even here, the Latinos are much more conservative than they were a couple election cycles ago, especially males. By 2050, it wouldn't surprise me at all if Latinos were voting more like their white neighbors
Too bad socialism wouldn’t look like a popular political leaning for those Latinos. Because the failure of socialism is not letting them run their experiment.
Last I checked, you can vote conservative no matter what your skin color. “White neighbors?” Are you insinuating that only white people are able to be conservative? Go to places like Seattle and you’ll find tons of white liberals out there. Many Latinos are conservative to begin with. They’re hard working family oriented people. That alone is a conservative dynamic. Don’t assume just because someone is a certain skin color it automatically means they are a certain political affiliation.
Naw, not happening. Viva Zapata
The truth is whoever is doing well is going to vote to preserve the status quo (thus voting more conservative). If enough new arrivals can flourish, they will vote conservative. If America defaults on its debts and fails to deliver basic social services and economic opportunity, people will look for someone to blame regardless of their skin color. If America does poorly enough as a nation over the next few decades there may be a reverse immigration trend
America leaving it's position as the global hegemon voluntarily will be (very) bad ngl
Why?
@@jarekkish5515 China and it's allies will take over and they won't magically want to leave the US alone and the US will probably lose a lot of allies since those allies will feel betrayed that the US left. I personally, as a non-American, would rather not see a world controlled by the so-called BRICS-nations.
@@SkywarpG1X Well, it couldn't be any worse than America's imperial realities.
@@jarekkish5515 At least in America, you can still speak your mind and dissent from within, which is exactly what will spell its demise as the global hegemon.
@@jarekkish5515 it absolutely could and would be. Studying the historical and present geopolitical situation makes that abundantly obvious. The issue is that the USA might still have to back away, even only for a time, in order to break the hold on the ruling class and force a permanent internal power change.
Back in 2016 I felt Trump was, if you zoom out, a death throw of old conservatism triggered by the post-Bush decline of the Republican Party
I'd go with more polarization and more of the great sort. Expect nothing to get done at the federal level while states band together on their own
The Balkan state's ask first time.
Idk. Biden managed to accomplish quite a lot in his first two years, even though he only had a 50/50 senate and a slim house majority. American Rescue Plan, Bipartisan infrastructure Bill, CHIPS act, inflation reduction act. His most transformative initiatives, universal child care, free community college, minimum wage hike, were killed when Manchin and Sinema sunk the Big Back Better bill, but this is still the biggest government investments we’ve seen since LBJ, and it’s brought big gains for infrastructure and clean energy.
It depends on what the senate will look like in the coming decades though. Obama basically couldn’t do anything for the last six years of his presidency without senate control.
I'd say this is true, but I don't see it happening in reality. We're going to continue seeing conservative states start swinging further left as more people from the very far left and very populated Democrat states start moving to those conservative states. Another 10 million Californians could move to North Carolina, or any other red state, and that red state would flip completely and become solid blue, and California would remain solid blue, for example.
If the Republicans don't start catching up in their social policies, they're going to fall behind, and if they start falling behind a lot, they're going to be forced to change. Maybe the parties will become more polarized for a while, but when the Republicans start to lose a significant amount of their electoral power, and they begin to need to win a significant amount of swing states to get into the white house, while the democrats reach a point where they only have to win one swing state, maybe at most one swing state, for the presidency, that polarization, atleast on the right, is going to just fall apart and force the party to reconsider their stance on key topics, such as lgbtq rights. In my opinion, it looks like as history marches forward, the left is going to be able to become a lot less compromising on social policies, while the right has to start becoming a lot more compromising and to start giving into demands for increased freedoms and mental help for lgbtq youth, increased acceptance of illegal migration and migration in general, abortion rights, etc etc.
Not at all, there will a powerful central authority with nearly limitless power. Just look at what gen Z wants dude, and then imagine them voting. It's not rocket science.
more state independence or even secession/confederation woiuld be neat, real unity now obviously impossible everything very polarized and tense and nobody is getting what they want, i think thats the peaceful solution. multiple state on both sides already straight ignore or refuse to enforce some federal law
Future America:
1. Isolationist
2. Authoritarian
3. Nationalist
4. Social Liberalism
Unfortunately the rhetoric of domestic non-interventionism hasn't come true. High intervention, low services.
Reasonably speaking, what would the American right have to do to win on social issues, as opposed to the left over the coming decades?
The right wing will have to alter their positions to stay relevant. I don't see how this change is such a surprise considering that Republicans haven't won the popular vote since Reagan with the exception of Bush in 2004
They'd have to somehow take over the media and messaging.
Until that happens, the only way they win on social issues is by letting democrats suffer under what they have wrot for themselves and see if they learned their lesson.
The right lost on this regard solely because they don't have the platforms and institutional power to keep up. The media is mainly controlled by left wing and pro political establishment figures. We're in a place where alot of people's positions on social issues come from the top down through the media, and people insulated from these issues first hand don't know better, and won't know better until their communities are ruined by what they were lead to vote for. They vote they way they do because they were told it was virtuous by someone in the media.
Until this narrative control by a single political interest is broken, people will only learn the hard way. Hopefully before it's too late.
Long term? Things that in many cases would likely be considered some type of war crime probably.
Probably catch up in the modern age on stances like LGBTQ+ rights, abortion rights, just generally trying to ensure equality for all Americans instead of just rich heterosexual men
@@vincebelanger361
What rights to LGB people not have that everyone else already has, and how is the right fighting against them?
The future of American politics should be multi-party system
It’s now time people focus on the Hispanic demographic, as it has always been silenced, but now people realize how important we are to the country.
No more second tier citizens or WetBack operations .
Red states FTW
We love our red states, but we need to fix and unite the WHOLE country. There is no United States without all the states.
@@MonsieurDean true bro, and also vote out the RINOS..
"A more activist government that will enforce order"
God that sent a chill down my spine... we're so fucked. By the time the next generation realizes it'll be way too late.
I mean this is a consequence of weak domestic policy and corruption thanks to the Democratic party.
Our best hope is Trump since he plans to purge most corrupt institutions and replace the people there with patriots loyal to the American cause.
And while that may sound scary to you take this into consideration:
The supreme courts Republicanization is what eliminated affirmative action and shot the government's ability to blackmail facebook and Twitter in the face.
Also it's something that is practiced more or less in other countries: here in Romania a new party means new civil servants since the party has no time to bicker and be stopped by the current administration.
Trump saw a lot pushback by the establishment, which is why he will simply eliminate it so he can get shit done.
Another weekend, another nice video!
Howdy, pal!
@@MonsieurDeanyou're awesome man!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
@@danielsantiagourtado3430 😁
Go Republican..the only hope as of now
I think there are three other major trends: 1) Our ever evolving relationship with China and how Chinese policies impact us. 2) How power has shifted over to mega-corporations which become governing entities in and of themselves. 3) Changes in the climate, punctuated with an increase in natural disasters.
Love how a segment of the population cheered on deregulation and corporatism in the name of free market enterprise but is now leery
of megacorps, big pharma, big tech... My friend, this was the logical conclusion.
@@Peter-bx7ipI don't see any leeriness in their en-acted policies though. Trump gave the greatest corporate tax cut in human history.
I'm expecting a rise in false flag type environmental disasters being blamed on climate change to further an agenda.
@@Peter-bx7ipat this point there isn’t even a free market especially when the little guys aren’t even given a chance
the climate isn't changing 😂same disasters have always happened
Day 80 of asking for what if the Zulu beat the British out of South Africa
Damn I’m already bat 80 days that’s crazy
One day friend one day
We could call this the ‘Nationalist’ Era
Populist suits it better imo
@@godhimself1128a bit of both, and historically it has led to some bad stuff
@@dmonee6196 Ohhhh yeah it does hehe
Literally how? The US is becoming more racially incoherent by the day.
um, no
I always wondered. Is there a reason you use the hedge-e-mon pronunciation instead of hedge-em-in? I hear it both ways.
That’s just how I learned to pronounce the word.
Hegemon, hegemon monsters, hegemon are the champions!
😂
The fact that the confederate battle flag is on the Republican map proves that this video is a joke. I mean seriously all you have to do is read a history book.
@@AmericanScout-USA The Republican party was always half progressive and half conservative since the start. Teddy Roosevelt started the split between the two factions and the 1916 election solidified the split. The Dixiecrats were no different from the northern democrats. The Dixiecrats survived the war… someone should read about reconstruction and the life of MLK Jr.
I love this series sad its come to an end. Maybe a del e ito the pre revolution politics of the 13 colonys would be a good prequel
I don't think there is any chance at a unifying ideology, trend or way of thought. Polls trend towards polarization of the two halves and even if some new economic agenda brought from top down could help people of both sides, the difference in social agendas would still be a point of tension.
Neo feudalism. Unfortunately the answer is neo feudalism.
As a foreigner looking at this….this is downright horrible. Both are terrible! This is just “pick your poison” !
Great video made me think 🧐 😊
One thing I believe is that the United States is going to not just have political issues but also deepening regional issues from the west coast regions wanting to split texas eating independence and the new south movement
Yep. There was already a plan in place by the democrats for the west coast states to secede in case Trump won in 2020. God only knows what they have in store for 2024!
That is a deep issue seeing as there hasn't been such a north south divide since the Confederate days.
I don't know about the west coast though. They may want to split, but unlike the red south the west coast lacks the necessary resources to be self-sufficient.
There is a whole leftist movement that has been brewing in the Appalachian Mountains. The real rednecks are making a comeback.
@@Wendeta-hq2cp the west issue isn’t so mischievous a split more as in the rural more conservatives regions of Oregon and Washington have been voting to leave to make a new state or join Idaho
@@bigmetalman4257
I know. The greater Idaho movement. Would be cool, even if the political stability would be shattered.
What’s Utreon? I can’t find info on it anywhere.
Got my like, and subscribed. Nicely done.
Democratic Party, not Democrat Party. Like the Republican Party, not Republic Party.
The form of each party takes will likely change. Your previous videos on the various factions in liberal, progressive, and conservative all show ideologies are in flux. With the high debt, business and economic matters are going to come crashing home to impact the American way of life. Which ever party can present the most convincing solutions to those future problems will win the electorate. That means it will be a party who has to be pro business in regards to promoting growth, wage growth, and employment. Neither current parties' platforms go far to encourage all three.
Both parties are pro-business, and that's the problem. We need a worker's party.
@@icantcomeupwithnames469
I smell communist
No there not
Democrats arent really pro economy
And its obvious in there actions that actively hurts economy
Republicans there is bit of bone to support the claim its pro buss
@@IndianaJonesTDH What do you think communism is?
@@icantcomeupwithnames469
Communism viva Karl Marx to keep it simple no irl just theroy
Is obvious revolution and nationalization of everything
Seizing private property to form collectization
Obviously anti Semitic (marxs jewish question and reference to international fiance) atheistic anti capitalist
This bit of a boiled down and I may l left some stuff out but goes over bit political economic and societal structure
@@icantcomeupwithnames469a death cult
Love the videos
Honestly though, there are no blue states, just blue cities surrounded by a lot of red.
The real question will be is how the diaspora or rather exodus of people from cities that are middle-high income earners will effect different places around the country. Californification has absolutely devastating the housing market in some parts of the country, and I hope it doesn't continue to be a trend, but basedeven on just Boise, Idaho housing prices, it's not looking good, plus it seems that voting trends for these people carry over, and since most of the movement is away from blue cities, it could mean that many rural communities become more blue as a resykt, which often have policies that don't work for rural communities. It just sucks though because the poor always get screwed. :( Cute kitty btw :)
I can see that in the end of the video. This era will be like the 5th party system (new deal era) but on different issue's in the 7th party system :)
its all jews doesnt really matter what they call themselves or what color person they have speak for them. just jews. thats pretty much it
you got red jews, blue jews, and attempts at yellow or green jews, but at the end of the day - just jews
That' how democracies work and that's why every nation is under a democratic state.The government should control the market, and how people behave and it must focus on military,expansion and nationalism
@@Leonidas_psomiadis What do jews have to do with that? That's called capitalism. Seriously, read some Lenin. Imperialism, the Highest State of Capitalism. You're so close, but then you throw in some insane magic evil woo.
THis is a debate that needs to happen
We can speculate but never predict
Politics tend to be very fluid and change quickly or slowly at a drop of a dime
I don’t get what makes so Socialism and Communism so popular in 2023?
TikTok is the reason.
how is socialism and communism popular mainstream?
Communism isn´t as popular as many people seem to believe and for some reason even Bernie Sanders thought that Scandinavia was socialist, so atleast some of those "socialists" just want same things that are in Scandinavia... and another big part of socialists want a democratic socialism and direct democracy.
What if LBJ didn't went to Vietnam war what would be his presidency defined as? Expecting ur views on it
I have a hard time understanding what your saying but from what I can make out. LBJ didn't start the war he expanded it. I think it wouldn't be a great video.
LBJ would have been remembered primarily for the Great Society Program, including the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act.
civil rights act, voting rights act, medicare+medicaid, war on poverty
You make great videos wow
Mate, i surely hope American wont become fascist.
The Republican Party is in trouble, they keep losing suburbs and moderate voters. They have made minimal gains with Hispanic and Black voters, but not enough to save them in states like Texas, Arizona, and Georgia.
I agree with you except about Texas. It isn’t likely to flip in the next few years.
Good
The Republican establishment is just controlled opposition at this point, they are even more disconnected from their voting base than the Democrats are
Totally agree, its hard to find a good strategy to counter Pedocrat beliefs like child mutilation/grooming and abortions at any stage. Its hard to counter the economic boom we're in. Gas is so cheap, I'm only paying twice as much as I did under Orange Man! Sure you have to sell your kidneys for groceries, but at least Joementia created millions of part-time fast food jobs, just get a 2nd or 3rd job you lazy bums! Things are going so well for the Pedocrats they may not even have to resort to underhanded schemes like ballot harvesting to win elections!
@@TheArticOven So you actually want to live under the boot of totalitarian technocrats and their disingenuous government agenda enforcing woke ideology peddling media acolytes, and thuggish civilian militias?
Another weekesn another great video! Z! Hit me up man!🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
We’ll have to wait and see, and of course act to shape it.
Man you have excellent content! Very well done, earned a new sub.
The extremes :liberal and conservative have become the minority; especially the extreme liberal .There needs to be new parties .
Good video, but it assumes a strictly "Democrat vs Republican" narrative. Both parties owned by corporate interests. In fact, America is no longer even a Republic, but an corporatocracy led by an elitist oligarchy. Both of parties encompass around 20% of registered voters each. The future of American politics will be dictated by the more centrist Independent voters, which is currently 49% of all voters and growing while the two corporate parties are continuing to lose voters. Independents tend to lean left on social issues and more right on fiscal issues. There is also an emphasis on focusing on dealing with domestic issues over foreign entanglements. Both of the corporate parties will continue to fade while issues based Independents will start to dominate, forcing badly needed changes on government and society.
As a high school government teacher your view of the younger generation is accurate on social issues , but having had many discussions with them on Ukraine or even Africa I think you might need to did a little deeper
Jeffersonians were correct. Not everyone should be able to vote.
Hispanics zooming to the right (like they did in many states in 2020) and completely shutting down the border ASAP is the only hope for the right wing in America. Otherwise I can't see the right or maybe even the country surviving for long.
The "country no longer surviving" thing is just a LARP to get right-wingers to the polls. They did the same exact thing during the Obama years yet nothing happened. Maybe there'll be another few racially/sexually/politically motivated mass shootings from both sides after 2024 but not enough to start some type of civil war that people are desperately hoping for.
@@Andres-uw2kf Even when it becomes majority Hispanic, y'all still won't be the ones in charge LMAO. You'll have to take that up with the Israel lobby.
Shutting the border? Explain
With border guards handing out cell phones and Biden Harris t-shirts at the border, I doubt it tbh
I agree that we will become more focused on us here. Almost everyone i talk to agrees with that. Black, white, republican, democrat, gay or straight all say we need to focus on home. And stay away from these other careless hostile countries. Our military needs to focus on keeping them out while we sort ourselves out here. Im just trying to figure out how to love my fellow americans again as i always have. Many have become bitter and dont seem to want me to try to love them anymore. They just want to be left alone, and so im alone. Or its so rough that there focused on money and do strange things to get it. 🤷♂️
I'd look to DSA Conventions as a solid model for scaling up democratic participation. Particularly the 2023 convention. Mass democracy has never been modeled better than at that event. I'm not sure anyone fully registered the importance of it either.
Workers MUST own and control the means of production. Wage slavery IS slavery.
Very few people support that ideology, mixed economies have proven more successful all around the world.
@@AmericanScout-USA It’s because life got too good for them
Basically we are doomed as a society
Yup
Why is everyone in this community so pessimistic
@@ebrimajallow9631 Its just sad to see the founding culture of America wither away, with Christianity and the white race on the decline as Hispanics and atheism takes its place. The new "America" is only the same in that the name is the same and both vaguely liked liberal democracy.
@@reeseman1932you’re another one of those “great replacement” conspiracy theorists aren’t you
@@reeseman1932Hispanics are great for America watchu mean, for one they are just fun people and they provide cheap labor for a new national industry that we will need for the next world war in the next few decades
It's Over
What is Utreon and how can I find it?
Imagine wanting to expand voting access to noncitizens while at the same time saying a foreign power is interfering with our elections.
i think america is gonna go hyper conservative for like 25 yeas.
With the wild unpopularity of forced birth legislation? Not a chance.
@@icantcomeupwithnames469it will, once the world economy collapses and we enter the greatest depression, which is bound to happen within the next 20 years. It literally cannot not happen. Europe mathematically simply will collapse within that time frame, because there is not enough young people making money to pay for the older people's pensions, and everyone else on welfare. The US has printed, since the pandemic, literally, trillions of dollars, and no, this is not an exaggeration, more money has been printed in 3 years than in the entirety of the last 200 since the foundation of America. I suggest you prepare your buttyhole, because the cultural left wing as we know it will simply not survive the backlash.
@@ceejay1476 "capitalism is unsustainable, and that's gay people's fault"
@@icantcomeupwithnames469 if you were slightly smarter maybe you'd realize the entirety of the anti establishment vote in western europe goes to anti-immigration conservative parties for a reason; the left cultural paradigm is extremely entenched in the political and economic establishment(banks), and is rejected because of it.
Muslims, which are the literal beating hope of the left wing in europe, are extremely anti lgbt and anti feminism. If you think otherwise, then you're literally just rejecting hard statistics. The only reason they vote left wing is because they don't have enough of a vote to make their own muslim parties -- Yet. But they will, in very few years. And once that happens, the left wing parties in europe will be left with an extremely small amount of the vote (10 - 15% of the population at most ). No matter how you look at it, the cultural left cannot survive the turn of the decade, unless something incredibly unexpected happens to occur. America will follow suit after the backlash over what is going to happen in Europe reaches there. Keep living in the clouds tho, you yourself know you have no possible counter arguments about how the F- is the left going to survive this.
@@ceejay1476What left-wing parties, centrist-at-best socdems? They're still capitalist, and socdem programs are often being gutted by neolibs as well. Muslims also are also overwhelmingly pretty normal people, so your focus on them is strange. Heck, I regularly listen to a muslim communist who makes constant homoerotic jokes.
I've seen a considerable increase in both American Catholics and American monarchists, very often they overlap. In my view America is likely in for some interesting times as a noticeable portion of the youth actually oppose the national myths, whether because they are commies or because they are anti-enlightenment. On the right in America I basically see the Calvinists supporting a type of Christian nationalism and the new right, or Christian resurgence/revival/great awakening or whatever you like to call them being fundamentally anti-liberal and anti-democracy, both these groups have strength that conservatism doesn't by actually being ideologies driven towards actual things and not just a cult of the past.
Did I misunderstand you? What reason would American Catholics have to support a monarch, especially a Calvinist one?
I’ve noticed that too, mainstream conservatives just have nothing to back up their words. They just want to hit the break not get out of the car entirely.
@@wargriffin5Some younger Catholics are repulsed by the slow move away from traditionalism in the Church, and a few have called for a society-wide return to tradition, up to and including monarchy. You can look it up. For example, priests under the age of 30 are far, far more ideologically conservative than those over 50. Since people with these ideologies (not including the priests, of course) tend to have quite a few children. You could imagine a future where this belief becomes more common. I think the original commenter meant to say “Catholic” instead of “Calvinist.”
@@landrypierce9942but why monarchism? It's totally antithetical to the founding of this nation. This country was founded on the hate of overly centralized power. I'm just curios how your coming to a monarchist revolution?
Any fellow monarchists? :)
withdrawing from the global economy will be not be easy
How did this obsession with democracy take hold in American politics in the first place...
Damm I’m early
One thing I have been researching for the last 5 years, and haven't gotten very far is, Why ANY voting law ISNT an Infringement on Constitutionally Protected rights (15, 19, 24, 26), But ANY gun laws ARE??
This has nothing to do with the material in the video. Stop baiting responses.
For most of american history the country was run by people who explicitly did not want everyone to vote. The idea of everyone being allowed to vote regardless of land ownership, gender, race, etc. is unfortunately rather modern. For example president joe biden grew up with legal segregation and a voting age of 21. Do you think he's going to be the president to give felons the right to vote?
It literally talks about voting early, as well as Voting/Elections, that are a hot topic today, they may have impact in the future.
@@everrettbreezewood3665 the video literally starts out by defining american eras based on voting laws
1:27 Dude that AI image is so weird! Also why is the lectern facing away from the crowd? lol
Anarchy, because that's what come just after an empire with no culture turns rogue and collapses.
America is socialist/corporatocracy. Unfortunately the handful of political 3rd parties are kept obscure by the Dems/Repub. If people joined 3rd parties there would be less strife because we would have true representation.
Sure pal. Socialism is the problem.