@WickedBinge Please make iCarly Characters Good To Evil, Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil & Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil?
Sid is honestly not really a bad guy. While he is the polar opposite of Andy, he's just doing what he believes to be fun. Yes, in the eyes of the toys, this is seen as sick and sadistic, but in Sid's eyes, he's just having fun. He just loves to blow up toys. The same thing lays with Al. While he did steal Woody and commit a crime. He's simply trying to bring together the complete collection of the classic tv show, Woody's Roundup and know that another collector wants it to be part of his museum, and let's be honest here. If you had a collector's item(s) that were extremely rare and in high value. You'd wanna do anything to get it all and sell it all together to make a lot of money. Excluding the stealing part, cause I don't condone that. And wait a minute, hold the phone. The garbage man was Sid? Ok, even I didn't know that.
Agreed. We’ve all come across kids in our neighborhood who liked to blow things up just like Sid. And Sid is definitely not pure evil, given he didn’t realize that toys were alive when breaking them, but since the movie is from the perspective of toys, he can be considered an antagonist, albeit one of the least evil. But for Al, I’d say he’s more towards the middle. Sure, he’s a jerk and didn’t try to hurt anyone, but stealing is against the law and he never seems to learn his lesson and believes the planet revolves around him. Ordinarily, being a collector is a hobby, but stealing a valuable from a yard sale when the host makes it clear that it’s not for sale is a no-no. So, I’d say that Al is way worse than Sid, despite his intentions to keep toys pristine and repair any damages. Both of what they did was not to be condoned, but it’s hard to argue that Sid might need help, given the ongoing counter argument over Sid’s parents.
The Toy Story series is truly special. Not only because of the characters, but also begin an era of CG animation as we know today. I know some of these villains are clearly understandable by their motives, but oh my god! Lotso is clearly an truly bitter character.
Least evil: Mutant Toys (Turned on the villain) Al (Just a greedy businessman) Sid (Doesn’t know the toys are sentient) Ken (A liar who redeemed himself) Gabby Gabby (Had motives) Evil Buzz (Under control from Lotso) Big Baby (Killed Lotso in the end) Bensons (They’re terrifying) Emperor Zurg (A galactic conqueror) Ron Talkins (Al but even worse) The Clerick (Power hungry) Stinky Pete (Geez!) Lotso (Tried to burn our toys alive!)
Big Baby didn’t kill Lotso. He threw him in a garbage bin for his lies and abuse. Also, Ken was not a liar, he and Big Baby were completely manipulated and abused by Lotso, who used them as his henchmen. And Demo Mode Buzz does not count because those were Lotso’s actions, not Buzz’s.
on the other hand. if Sid still had those tendencies that wasn't grown out off, he would have moved up to applying the same torture to people in ways that would make Jigsaw feel impressed.
I've always thought the same. There was one episode of SVU where the older brother was bullying his sister by brutally wrecking her dolls, then escalates to drowning a dog and holding another kid hostage at gunpoint. I don't think Sid was right in the head until the toys scared him straight.
He's... A kid. Kids do wild things with their toys. This isn't the case of a sadist torturing animals, he's expressing his imagination on inanimate objects.
Pixar villains evil to most evil a remake Sinner medals: Darwin-Darla(finding nemo) Wrath-Chef Skinner(Ratatouille) Pride-Ercole Visconti(Luca) Envy-Randall(Monsters Inc) Greed-Ernesto De la Cruz(coco)
Zurg only makes amends with New Belt Buzz and not the old one so remains his arch enemy, even as a toy and a villain in the rest of the franchise due to him being popular.
That’s correct. Zurg even claimed himself to be Utility Belt Buzz’s father and they bonded in the climax of Toy Story 2 as the original Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys rushed to the airport to continue their journey to rescue Woody.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 Thank you. I do wish Woody would encounter Zurg sometime in the franchise once the former resumes his villainy. He's a Toy Story character you know. Rex encountered him.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 Zurg is also a Toy Story villain so he'II remain in the franchise to appear more and Woody could encounter him one day. It would be great, wither you think so or not.
Well, Stinky Pete is actually less evil than Lotso. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity as kids never bothered to purchase him from a toy store and the rising popularity of space toys contributed to the termination of the Woody’s Roundup tv series. He was also distrustful of children due to Woody and Jessie’s respective situations with Andy and Emily, believing that children destroy, neglect and give away toys as they mature. He believed that The Konishi Toy Museum was the safest place for The Roundup Gang to live and only wanted what was best for the cowpokes and Bullseye. At least he redeemed himself in an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters, expressing his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and their lives are solely bound for the trash. His excuse for harming and imprisoning innocent toys was petty and all over Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush, due to Daisy accidentally losing him at a rest stop. Other toys had no control over the situation and weren’t involved with him getting replaced. This sinister plan makes Lotso the punching bag for turning Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acting as the warden, snatching Big Baby away from Daisy, condemning Ken to death when he sides with Andy’s toys and reunites with Barbie and more importantly, nearly sending Andy’s toys to a terrible death at the landfill, even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his heartless pink fur from getting shredded. To me, Stinky Pete is like an overprotective parent or guardian fearing for their child’s safety or an unpopular person in society with little to no friends or has been single all his or her life. Lotso is like a school bully, whose behavior can never be corrected and ultimately results in getting expelled from school or even tossed into prison.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 However, as this online interview was most likely made by people who weren't involved in the film, it's up to speculate whether this information is canonical or not. So he remains a villain and Woody's enemy in the Toy Story franchise overall.
As far as I’m concerned, all of Andy’s toys (save for Bo Peep, Slinky, and Rex inherently) were more antagonistic to Woody than Sid in the 1st film, which is saying a lot. Woody himself wasn’t exactly anything but condescending, but then that accident set them off to be so hostile towards him, which wasn’t helped by all the attention they gave to Buzz in addition to the teasing they gave to Woody. We know that realistically, Sid would only be an antagonist if he were a bully to other kids, besides his sister. But Woody really couldn’t catch a break in the film even if he didn’t let his jealousy get the better of him.
@@Joseph_Drew_III Mr. Potato Head is not a villain. He’s a neutral character. Yeah, he was disrespectful to Woody in the first Toy Story, but let’s not overlook his role as One-Eyed Bart, a wanted money thief. He’s simply cynical and grumpy all the time, although he does constantly prey on Woody’s insecurities.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 According to some references on the movies, it was implied that Potato Head was once Andy’s favorite toy before Woody came along. While it makes sense that he was very much jealous of the attention Woody was getting, it doesn’t make sense that he didn’t feel the same towards Buzz when he was Andy’s new favorite. Honestly we can understand the way Woody was feeling all because of how Andy was playing with Woody changed when Buzz arrived, he treated Woody like fodder for Buzz’s actions, and there’s no explaining that night he put Woody in the toy chest. As for Mr. Potato Head, he adores Buzz so much, and ruins the moment Bo Peep was trying to comfort Woody, pushing him to confront Buzz. And only he looked up at Woody complaining when no one else did, but then was shocked when Buzz got knocked out the window. What followed was him leading everyone on a mutiny against Woody, threatening him for if he ever returns without Buzz, and leaves Woody for dead after accusing him of “murdering” Buzz.
6 Ice Age Movies Good to Evil The Good- Most Good: Roshan’s Mother 2nd most good: Julian 3rd most good: Brooke Louis Precious Roshan Eggbert/ Shelley / Yolko Ellie Sid Peaches Easter Bunny Buck Easter Bunny Buck’s Friends Prancer Neil de Buck Weasel Santa Claus Manny Tribal Chieftain Neutral: Scrat Stu Diego Granny Mama Dinosaur Shira Ethan / Sneffie / other mammoths Crash & Eddie Fast Tony The Mini Sloths Bad to Evil- Ronald / Aardvark Boy / other animal Campers Various Dinosaurs Carnivorous Plant Gavin/ Gurdy / Roger The Shangri Llama Carl & Frank Dab Zeke / Oscar / Lenny Scratte The Sirens Cretaceous & Maelstrom Lone Gunslinger Mom / Dad / Uncle Fungus / Marshall Rudy Flynn / Raz / Squint / Gupta / Silas 3rd most evil: Soto 2nd most evil: Orson Most Evil: Captain Gutt
@@Werten25 Gutt starts off that way, then when Manny destroys his ship then he becomes evil: also Soto didn’t enslave hyraxes or kidnap all the other animals that’s why Gutt is the most evil
Stinky Pete turned out to have redeemable traits as evidenced by an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters where he expressed his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Despite his evil demeanor, Stinky Pete cares about Woody, Jessie, Bullseye and other toys and only wanted what was best for them. While he meant well, he wanted to reside in the museum for his own desire and being free of kid ownership was his problem and only his problem. He is also the first Toy Story villain to be sympathized with because of his tragic backstory.
I couldn’t agree more. Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
@@BullyMaguire2024 Thank you. I just happen to have common sense about Pixar villains. Heck, I even agree with the Toy Story 3 writers’ decision to punish Lotso. Test audiences who had sympathized with Lotso due to his backstory wanted him to push the button in the incinerator scene to redeem himself, but according to the DVD commentary, director Lee Unkrich explained that Lotso chose not to save Andy’s toys so that audiences who had gotten to know them for three films in fifteen years could care about the heroes even more, when it looked like the end for them, shortly before The Pizza Planet Aliens rescued them with the claw. Thus, Lotso's redemption was dropped. Another reason is because they did not want Lotso to get off so easy.
@@BullyMaguire2024 Well, the thumbnail as well as the crimes Lotso committed were what obviously made him the most evil Toy Story villain. It’s hard to argue with that.
I was actually expecting him to be the least evil. Because I don’t consider the Mutant Toys to be villains since they just appear creepy but don’t do anything actually bad.
-Babe (and Pig in the City) Characters: Good to Evil 🐖🌃 -Tiny Toon Adventures: Good to Evil -The Secret of Nimh: Good to Evil -The Last Unicorn: Good to Evil unicorn 🦄 -Mune: Guardian of the Moon: Good to Evil 🌙 -Paulie (1998): Good to Evil 🦜 -Robots (2005): Good to Evil 🤖 -Osmosis Jones: Good to Evil -Cats Don’t Dance: Good to Evil -Meet the Feebles: Good to Evil -Watership Down (1978): Good to Evil 🐇 -Balto (1995): Good to Evil -UHF: Good to Evil -Freakazoid: Good to Evil -Freakazoid: Dumb to Brilliant -Tiny Toon Adventures: Dumb to Brilliant 1upbinge: Pac-Man World 1, 2, & 3 Characters: Good to Evil Sly Cooper Villains: Evil to Most Evil
They should also make - Rio Characters Good To Evil - Cloudy With a Chance Of Meatballs Characters Good To Evil - iCarly Characters Good To Evil - Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil - Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil - Epic Characters Good To Evil - Victorious Characters Good To Evil - Bee Movie Characters Good To Evil
@@cuddlyfox980 Which Stuart Little villain do you think is the most evil? Smokey from Stuart Little 1, Falcon from Stuart Little 2 or The Beast from Stuart Little 3: The Call Of The Wild?
Tbh the moment when Lotso was gonna go through that shredder when he was stuck (and if I was Woody) I would just leave him there because I would think should I really help the person who got me and my friends here in the first place and I still wonder what would’ve happened if they stayed up on the magnet conveyor belt and how did they manage to get Slinky down if every other metal thing was still stuck
Well, they tried to give him a choice to either do the right thing and change for the better or stay evil and bitter, but Lotso chose to stay evil and bitter when he chose to leave Andy's toys to die.
Inside Out Characters: Good to Evil Good: 1. Bing Bong🥇 2. Riley's Parents🥈 3. Sadness🥉 4. Fear 5. Riley's Teacher 6. Disgust 7. Joy and Anger Grey Area: 8. Mind Workers🥉 Bad to Evil 9. Security Guards🥈 10. Jangles the Clown🥇
If anyone's wondering, this is why I ranked Joy and Anger together and in the good tier. I know what you're gonna say, Joy should be ranked lower because of how she treated sadness or anger should be lower because of what he did to Riley, but hear me out. Yes, Joy treated sadness poorly, but it wasn't her intention. Same thing goes for anger. The reason why I ranked them in the good tier, is because even though they are what made Riley worse, they still love Riley, and they want her to be happy and as safe as possible.
I think Big Baby should've been on the list. I think your next video should be on Treasure Planet. So we know for sure if Mr. Silver really is a villain or otherwise.
Big Baby wasn’t intentionally evil. He was completely manipulated by Lotso, who didn’t want him to stay with Daisy just because she replaced him with another Lotso plush.
Just like Ken, he follows Lotso's orders and catches any toy who escapes. But he turns when he realized that Lotso is a monster and lied to him about Daisy. Big Baby and Ken are kind of the same.
Do these Good to Evil or other ideas - Fish Hooks - My Gym Partner's A Monkey - Open Season - Symbiotic Titan - American Dragon: Jake Long - Rocket Power - The Life and Times of Juniper Lee - Ben 10 *old show - Indiana Jones - Rocko's Modern Life - Mucha Lucha - Cartoon Monkeys - Cartoon Business Owners/Managers *both Cartoon and Anime - Good to most Good Rick and Morty - Evil to most Evil Cartoon Assassins *both Cartoon and Anime - Evil to most Evil Cartoon Bullys *both Cartoon and Anime - Evil to most Evil Star Wars: The Clone Wars - Weak to Powerful Cartoon Superheroes *both Cartoon and Anime - Weak to Powerful Cartoon Supervillains *both Cartoon and Anime - Which Ben 10 Character Would Win Squid Game? *old show - Which Hey Arnold Character Would Win Squid Game? - Which Tom Kenny Voice Character Would Win Squid Game? - Bart Simpson Deeds
They should also make - Rio Characters Good To Evil - Cloudy With a Chance Of Meatballs Characters Good To Evil - iCarly Characters Good To Evil - Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil - Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil - Epic Characters Good To Evil - Victorious Characters Good To Evil - Bee Movie Characters Good To Evil
Well he is literaly a hypocrite who wasted his chance for redemption and turned a kindergarten into a brutal prison for toys. His "tragedy" is not an excuse. He is literaly the only villain considered pure evil.
@@kacperaskawski3461 Exactly! He was far from sympathetic despite his backstory. If you think about it, Lotso didn’t really care about Daisy herself, but only the attention that she gave him. Sure, he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but he had no right to snatch those two innocent toys and take his anger out on other toys, especially Andy’s toys. Not to mention that he ditched Andy’s toys to die in the incinerator portion of the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his hypocritical pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. What Lotso did was virtually inexcusable and unforgivable. Other toys had no control over him getting replaced whatsoever. Imprisoning innocent toys, even if they had owners and sentencing Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill was not the solution to getting what he wants. It’s hard to sympathize with a villain like Lotso, due to his immaturity and the way he handles grief.
@@elibridgers2781 , @The Nebula Guy & @Cari Pavel Lotso indeed was the most evil villain in the Toy Story franchise. He was a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
Yep, I laughed my ass off at that. We can’t gloss over how lazy Al is. He complains about driving to work on Saturdays, despite Al’s Toy Barn being located across the street and he could easily walk to there and back.
I know you probably won't see this but I hope someone does. I know he's just from Andy's mind, but I would include 1-eyed Bart and maybe Evil Dr. Pork Chop, er- MR. Evil Dr. Pork chop for fun. I just feel like it's worth mentioning how One-Eyed Bart literally blew up train tracks to try to kill a bunch of orphans so Woody would let him get away with the money. That is almost as bad (in many ways a lot worse) than anything Lotso has done.
Toy story villains evil to most evil my list Less evil 16 The mutant Toys 15 Gabby Gabby 14 Rextamis maximums 13 Sid 12 One eye Bart and evil Dr porkchop 11 Zurg 10 Utinidey belt buzz 9 Ken 8 Lostso's gang More evil 7 The Benson's 6 The clerics minions 5 Ron 4 Al Michigan Most evil 🥉The cleric 🥈Stinky pete 🥇Lostso hugging bear
I couldn’t agree more. Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
4:24, Sid caused more harm to the toys than Gabby did but unlike Gabby Gabby he had no idea that they were alive whereas she did. Therefore she should have been placed higher than he was.
No, Caleb had a valid reason to rank Sid higher than Gabby Gabby, compared to this. Sid Phillips is a disturbed kid who tears apart toys for horrific experiments. He will never stop and will go as far to even mutilate his innocent sister Hannah’s toys, including altering her Janie doll with a pterodactyl head. He even fed a Pizza Planet squeaky toy alien to his ugly dog, Scud, who also did everything he could to stop Woody and Buzz from escaping the Phillips residence. But you gotta look at things contextually. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think? Gabby Gabby is an isolated pull-string talking doll who yearned to have what Woody had: kid ownership. Much like Stinky Pete, Gabby Gabby’s backstory was extremely disheartening, but she wasn’t distrustful of kids, unlike Stinky Pete. She moved on to find another child to spend her life with, unlike Lotso. Not to mention that her friendship with her henchmen, The Bensons was authentic in contrast to Lotso’s hasty friendship with the Sunnyside toys. Although it was sad that she was ultimately rejected by Harmony, it was unbelievably satisfying when she finally got the love of a child that she wanted for God knows how long as a result of comforting a lost girl at a carnival. While her schemes of risking the safety of Forky to obtain Harmony’s attention were inexcusable, Gabby Gabby’s plans were far from sinister and she was mostly misunderstood. Every toy, with a good or bad personality deserves to be loved by a kid, even Gabby Gabby, despite her misguided nature.
@@matityaloran9157 but how would Gabby even know that Forky was made the day before she kidnapped him? Also, toys don't age, so they live for infinity and beyond unless someone like Sid gets their hands on them and does something like what Sid did to that combat carl.
@@matityaloran9157 I also realized that since Gabby wanted to steal Woody’s voice box she essentially wanted to rip out one of his internal organs. So yeah, she’s worse than Sid. In my honest opinion, she’s very overrated.
@@Sidthekid-l1t @Joseph Walker A Simple Summary Of The Toy Story Villains Sid Phillips is a disturbed kid who tears apart toys for horrific experiments. He will never stop and will go as far to even mutilate his innocent sister Hannah’s toys, including altering her Janie doll with a pterodactyl head. He even fed a Pizza Planet squeaky toy alien to his ugly dog, Scud, who also did everything he could to stop Woody and Buzz from escaping the Phillips residence. But you gotta look at things contextually. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think? The Evil Emperor Zurg was just as deluded as Buzz and admittedly was a hard villain to defeat, even for Rex. Since Zurg was a minor antagonist in Toy Story 2, there’s really not a whole lot to say about him. Even after Rex accidentally knocked Zurg over with his tail inside the interior of an elevator at Al’s apartment, he wasn’t the kind of villain that needed to be punished. It was incredibly satisfying to see Zurg bond with his supposed son, Utility Belt Buzz by playing catch, although Utility Belt Buzz declined to continue the mission to rescue Woody from Al and Stinky Pete. Al McWhiggin is a big thief donning a ridiculous chicken costume who has no patience for anybody or anything that gets in his way. The first boundary he crossed was stealing Woody from the Davis’ yard sale after Andy’s mom made it abundantly clear that he wasn’t for sale. Additionally, his manners towards public businesses are atrocious such as when he hastily dialed and demanded the cleaner to fix Woody, even though he never agreed on a specific date or time he was available. This is also evidenced by him yelling at the airport staff to be careful with his Roundup Gang collection. Let’s also not gloss over how lazy Al is. He complains about driving to work on Saturdays, despite Al’s Toy Barn being located across the street and he could easily walk to there and back. Not to mention inadvertently falling asleep on the couch and dropping his bowl of Cheetos on the floor, which was a failed attempt for Woody to retrieve his severed arm. The only nice thing we can say about Al is that unlike Sid, Al hates when toys get broken and wants them in perfect condition to earn as much money as possible. Like Hamm says “Crime doesn’t pay.”, which is a lesson that Al will unfortunately never learn. Stinky Pete is a resentful prospector doll because kids never bothered to purchase him from the dime-store shelf that he spent years on and the rising popularity of space toys contributed to the termination of Woody’s Roundup, a children’s western tv series that he was once part of. He was also distrustful of children because of Andy accidentally ripping Woody’s right arm and Jessie getting donated by her former owner, Emily. He believed that children destroy, neglect and give away toys as they mature. When Woody decided to go back to Andy after Buzz lectured him, Stinky Pete snapped and locked both cowpokes and Bullseye in Al’s apartment, revealing his true colors. Since Al planned to sell the Roundup Gang to make a profit, Stinky Pete came to the conclusion that The Konishi Toy Museum in Tokyo, Japan was the safest place for the Roundup Gang to live to prevent further disappointment and destruction from children. From Stinky Pete’s perspective, if kids didn’t want him, they can’t have him and it’s too late for kids to reconsider their choices. His selfish attempts to stop Woody from going to back to Andy were almost always successful until at the airport when Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys rescued Woody and sent Stinky Pete away in the backpack of a girl named Amy, much to the prospector’s horror. Stinky Pete turned out to have redeemable traits as evidenced by an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters where he expressed his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Despite his evil demeanor, Stinky Pete cares about Woody, Jessie, Bullseye and other toys and only wanted what was best for them. While he meant well, he wanted to reside in the museum for his own desire and being free of kid ownership was his problem and only his problem. He is also the first Toy Story villain to be sympathized with because of his tragic backstory. Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants. Gabby Gabby is an isolated pull-string talking doll who yearned to have what Woody had: kid ownership. Much like Stinky Pete, Gabby Gabby’s backstory was extremely disheartening, but she wasn’t distrustful of kids, unlike Stinky Pete. She moved on to find another child to spend her life with, unlike Lotso. Not to mention that her friendship with her henchmen, The Bensons was authentic in contrast to Lotso’s hasty friendship with the Sunnyside toys. Although it was sad that she was ultimately rejected by Harmony, it was unbelievably satisfying when she finally got the love of a child that she wanted for God knows how long as a result of comforting a lost girl at a carnival. While her schemes of risking the safety of Forky to obtain Harmony’s attention were inexcusable, Gabby Gabby’s plans were far from sinister and she was mostly misunderstood. Every toy, with a good or bad personality deserves to be loved by a kid, even Gabby Gabby, despite her misguided nature. Barring Sid, Zurg & Al, these toy villains not only act as a foil to Woody, but all of Andy’s toys. They can also act as a darker or lighter reflection of the villains from the franchise. For example, if Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys left Woody to be sold to the museum instead of saving him, then Woody would’ve ended up like Stinky Pete and never returned to Andy. If Jessie, Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys never let go of the fact that Andy’s mom mistook them for trash and threw them away, they would’ve ended up becoming like Lotso. Not every toy in the franchise was lucky to have a kid like Andy or Bonnie. Like Woody says, a toy’s occupation is a child’s plaything. Sans Gabby Gabby, a toy’s purpose is a lesson that Stinky Pete, Lotso or any true toy villains will never learn.
@Joseph Walker Yep, Lotso was the most evil Toy Story villain. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash.
Nah Sid’s a good kid who is just misunderstood & has a sad life since I can relate to him in real life. Lotso is definitely the worst evil Villain in Toy Story History in all of Pixar in my honest opinion
If the Mutant Toys were gonna be counted, I feel like Lotso's Gang (Sparks, Twitch, Stretch, Chunk, and Big Baby) should have been counted. Demo Mode Buzz Lightyear is also, arguably, a villain.
Demo Mode Buzz is Andy’s Buzz, Lotso just reprogrammed him to make him his slave. Also, Lotso’s Gang wasn’t intentionally evil, they were unaware of Lotso’s true nature until Andy’s toys came along and Woody revealed the truth about the cold-hearted teddy bear. More importantly, Lotso lied to Big Baby, who was rightfully Daisy’s toy and Lotso snatched him away from her because he was replaced with another Lotso plush and Big Baby wasn’t replaced. Like Woody said “She replaced *YOU* ! And if you couldn’t have her, then no one could! You lied to Big Baby and you’ve been lying ever since!” This basically means that Lotso believes himself above other toys and if he doesn’t have an owner, then no toy deserves to have an owner. WickedBinge didn’t count The Mutant Toys, Lotso’s Gang (save for Ken) or Demo Mode Buzz Lightyear probably also because they didn’t have enough of an influence on the Toy Story franchise.
@@pbsfundingaddict790correct, DEMO mode Buzz Lightyear is not a villain because Lotso just reprogrammed Andy’s Buzz to think he was an actual space ranger so he could convince Buzz that Lotso and the other daycare toys worked for Star Command and that Andy’s other toys were minions of the evil emperor Zurg so Buzz thought that he was doing the right thing being a hero locking up Zurg’s prisoners, he thought that he was serving the Galactic Alliance so DEMO mode Buzz only counts as an antagonist not a villain.
Lotso was indeed the most evil villain of the Toy Story universe. He is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
6:51, I would put Zurg in a lower spot than Gabby Gabby since even though he is actively trying to harm Buzz Lightyear it’s just because that was how he (as a supervillain action figure) was programmed and he doesn’t have any actual choice.
@@matityaloran9157 her foul deeds weren’t really that bad though. All she does is try to steal Woody’s voice box and kidnap Forky and even then, she still treated Forky with affability and was nice to him.
@@matityaloran9157 well, I’ve changed my mind about Sid and The Bensons being more evil than her, but I still think Zurg is more evil than Gabby since despite the both of them being bog standard, Zurg attempted murder which is worse than what Gabby wanted
Please do Thomas & Friends Characters: Good To Evil. (& while you're at it, please give the *Gold Medal of Good* to Thomas & the *Gold Medal of Evil* to Diesel 10)
WickedBinge doesn’t always give The Gold Medal Of Good to the main characters. It’s how they measure morality. For example, SpongeBob was ranked in The Good, but wasn’t The Most Good, due to his childish behavior and lack of self-awareness.
@JamieGamePlayThrough WickedBinge said that they’re going to do Thomas and Friends on Good to Evil at some point and if you don’t believe me go check out the comments of the Rick and Morty Moments: Gruesome to Most Gruesome video
Sid's character really is an interesting case to look at, and so I really appreciate the humanistic insights you made about him. Twisted and demented may only be scratching the surface, but there's a theory floating out there that his experiments with the various toy parts could have been some kind of emotional outlet given that his parents aren't shown to be as attentive or caring to him.
I agree with you. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
Sorry but I disagree Sid isn't evil. He might be a jerk but he is not evil. Look Sid's life he lives next store to Andy with the seemingly perfect life, with the perfect house, friends plenty of new toys, a mother that takes care of him. What do we know of Sid's life? His house is in crappy condition, his yard is a mess all he has is a bunch of old toys, we don't see a parent around, he has a reputation. He obviously has a creative side with how he takes toys some of which are broken and makes them into other toys. Turning those toys into other toys is probably an outlet for him that helps him forget about his crappy home life for a little bit. The finally Sid has no idea that toys are alive, then Woody comes along and shows Sid that they are. What do you think that would do to a person knowing that for years they have been torturing living creatures and not knowing it. In the credits for one of movies if I remember correctly we see Sid happily working as a garbage man, so he has obviously become a productive member of society. So no Sid's not evil.
@Kevin Green @thepayne78 I thought the same thing. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
2:49, Gabby Gabby should be placed as more evil than Sid was since Sid had no idea that the toys are alive whereas Gabby Gabby did. (Even if Sid were the more harmful of the two.)
@Big Vinny This is how WickedBinge ranked the Shrek villains: Least Evil - Prince Charming 🥉3rd Most Evil - Rumplestiltskin 🥈2nd Most Evil - The Fairy Godmother 🥇Most Pure Evil - Lord Farquaad
I liked seeing the specials in here too! Tbh, I wasn't sure where Zurg would be vs his Star Command OR Lightyear versions, but placing him in the lower tier makes sense since like you said, he makes amends and ends up having father and son time. The guy from the Halloween special is creepy, but not the same creepy as it may sound when you mention a stalker or something. It's so scary how his lizard appears to venture around the hotel, goes into each room, and then steals toys from kids (and heck, maybe even antique collectors!) to bring back. I couldn't find any words to describe him other than "creepy", but y'know. Kinda sad to not see some other henchmen of Lotso's - like Twitch and Chunk - but I'm assuming it's because they had very minor roles and were mostly seen just talking evil, doing a simple task such as holding someone still, or watching from afar as stuff happens. So I guess it makes more sense to leave Ken but otherwise, no one else since there were little to no actions from them.
Thanks for making this list! My order from least to most evil would be: Mutant toys Scud (Sid’s dog) Utility Belt Buzz Gabby Gabby The Besons Zurg Sid Big Baby Ken Al Stinky Pete Lotso Also could you please do Harry Potter & Fantastic Beasts villains evil to most evil?
The Buzz Lightyear from Toy Story 2 that thought he was a real space ranger is not evil at all he was just a minor antagonist because he thought our original Buzz was a space ranger who betrayed him.
I know and it annoys me that people who make these kinds of videos use those dumb excuses. Like for example, taking into account how successful the villains were. Being successful has nothing to do with morality. Another thing is not being taken seriously. Or being a coward. Like a lot of people make videos of Disney villains evil to most evil and they always seem to give Prince John a free pass simply for being a coward and it rly annoys me.
@@BullyMaguire2024 You’re right. Incompetence isn’t a virtue. And neither is cowardice. All that points to is that to be a successful villain there must be some vices that they don’t have (like sloth).
@@BullyMaguire2024 If the video you’re referencing is the one I think you’re referencing I watched it and posted comments on it but I wasn’t on it inasmuch as I haven’t made or appeared in any UA-cam videos
@@BullyMaguire2024 I did post a lot of comments on that video yes. (I was just confused by what you meant by “were you on that video) since I wasn’t sure if you meant appearing in it or posting an online comment about it but yes I did post comments on that video.)
I would say Ronald Tomkins is far worse than Al McWhiggin. Consider that Al only committed that one single crime(bad drivingnot withstanding), stealing Woody, only did it as a last resort after seeing an opportunity, only did so after attempting to purchase him legally and offering a more than reasonable sum for him, and only because he had an incredible but very narrow opportunity for which obtaining said doll was a necessity. Ronald Tomkins on the other hand had been systematicly stealing from his customers for quite a while, and selling their possessions. This wasn't some spur of the moment thing, he literally trained his pet to steal from customers! He basically made selling stolen toys part of his motel's business model, which in my opinion is far worse than a single crime of opportunity and desperation.
I'd put the dummies adjacent to Gabby is some fashion. Based on the master/servant relationship, I'd argue that they're guilty of the exact same actions. The argument for Gabby's redeemable traits is a legitimate argument, but one could argue that the loyalty shown to Gabby by the dummies is similarly redeemable. I'd also list Sid as being a bit more evil than he's listed here (switch him with Zurg), for being a bully to his sister.
Family/American Dad/Regular Show characters: Dumb to Brilliant South Park Characters: Dumb to Completely Brainless Family Guy/American Dad/Futurama/South Park Villains: Dumb to Brilliant Professor Farnsworth/Stewie Griffin/Sandy Cheeks inventions: Dumb to Brilliant Eric Cartman's manipulative schemes: Dumb to Brilliant Adult Cartoon Heroes: Good to Most Good less good - Meg Griffin, Jeff Fischer, Philip J Fry more good - Bob Belcher, Butters Stotch most good - Lord Nibbler, Mysterion (Kenny McCormick) Hunger Games trilogy deaths: Gruesome to Most Gruesome The Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit trilogies deaths: Gruesome to most Gruesome Cartoon Superheroes from non-superhero cartoons: Good to most Good Cartoon Supervillains from non-superhero cartoons: Evil to most Evil American Dad Parents: Good to Evil Pure: Greg Corbin Good: Roger Smith, Ma Ma & Bah Bah Ling (Francine's adoptive parents) Neutral: Stan & Francine Smith Bad: Jack Smith, Connie & Ted Robinson (Barry's parents) Evil: Nicholas & Cassandra Dawson (Francine's birth parents), Henry Fischer (Jeff's Father) Regular show relationships: Healthy to Toxic Bojack Horseman relationships: Healthy to Toxic Best South Park Celebrity parodies/roasts Best South Park Christmas themed episodes Eric Cartman/Butters Stotch deeds: Best to Worst Times that South Park got censored South Park Seasons: Best to Worst South Park POST COVID series characters: Good to Evil Pure: Rabbi Cartman Good: Tolkien Black, Wendy Testaburger Neutral: Kyle Broflovski Grey Area: Stan Marsh Bad: Clyde Donovan, Randy Marsh Evil: Victor Chaos (Butters) Family Guy Chicken-Style Fights: mild to most destructive Cartoon Birds/Bears/Rodents/Fish (not including Klaus Heissler because he is a man trapped in a goldfish's body): Good to Evil Cartoon Punching Bags: Least abused to Most abused Cartoon Bosses/Principals: Good to Evil Cartoon Presidents: Good to Evil Which Bojack Horseman character would win Squid Game? Which South Park character would win Squid Game? Which Pixar character would win Squid Game?
Toy Story Villains: Evil to Most Evil The Evil 1. Mutant Toys 2. Gabby Gabby 3. Sid Phillips 4. Emperor Zurg 5. The Bensons 6. Ken 7. Ronald Tompkins 8. Al McWhiggin 9. The Cleric 10. Stinky Pete 11. Lots-o'-Huggin' Bear
You have to understand Sid was just a troubled kid with an abusive dad and needed a creative outlet to vent, Woody was the actual villain of Toy Story 1 and he was redeemed.
One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
Big Baby wasn’t intentionally evil. He was completely manipulated by Lotso, who didn’t want him to stay with Daisy because he got replaced by another Lotso plush. Despite Lotso taking him away from Daisy, Big Baby eventually got fed up with Lotso’s abuse and selfishness and grew to residing at Sunnyside Daycare and was possibly in good hands with Barbie and Ken.
Toy Story Villains Least Evil to Most Evil: The Gold 🏅 of Least Evil goes to Gabby Gabby The Silver🥈of Least Evil goes to Big Baby The Bronze🥉of Least Evil goes to Sid Phillips The Benson Dummies Ken Emperor Zurg Lotsos Henchmen The Bronze🥉 of Evil goes to Al Mcwhiggin The Silver🥈 of Evil goes to Stinky Pete the Prospector The Gold🏅 of Evil goes to Lotso
But she treats Forky with affability plus she only wanted to be loved by a child. Also trying to steal Woody’s voice box is her worst crime which makes her super bog standard
Scud was just an ugly and mindless dog constantly preying on the destruction of Woody and Buzz and Utility Belt Buzz was basically just Buzz in his delusional space ranger mode.
You read my mind. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
Toy Story 4 is the only movie in the series that didn’t have a climax. The 1st movie had the scene with Sid in the backyard, the 2nd one had the airport scene and the 3rd one had the trash compactor scene
![Why Lotso is a Terrifying Villain [Toy Story 3]](/img/n.gif)
Toy Story Characters: Good to Evil --- bit.ly/35tSRUk
Pixar Romantic Relationships: ❤️ Healthy to Toxic ☢️ --- bit.ly/3yrUFav
@WickedBinge Please Do Total Drama characters Good 2 Most Good
@WickedBinge Please make iCarly Characters Good To Evil, Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil & Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil?
Ghostbusters good to evil
@Wickedbinge Please do the casagrandes characters good to evil Please
Pixar Villains Squid Game
The Mutant Toys have a great motivation for being villains and yet, they aren't. What well-written characters
Is it strange to say that the bensons, are even more unsettling than the mutant toys?
@@joshcoy6748 Not very much
Who else finds Al more hilarious than evil?
Me too
Me 3.
Me. His worst crime is petty theft.
Me
Me
Sid is honestly not really a bad guy. While he is the polar opposite of Andy, he's just doing what he believes to be fun. Yes, in the eyes of the toys, this is seen as sick and sadistic, but in Sid's eyes, he's just having fun. He just loves to blow up toys.
The same thing lays with Al. While he did steal Woody and commit a crime. He's simply trying to bring together the complete collection of the classic tv show, Woody's Roundup and know that another collector wants it to be part of his museum, and let's be honest here. If you had a collector's item(s) that were extremely rare and in high value. You'd wanna do anything to get it all and sell it all together to make a lot of money. Excluding the stealing part, cause I don't condone that.
And wait a minute, hold the phone. The garbage man was Sid? Ok, even I didn't know that.
Agreed. We’ve all come across kids in our neighborhood who liked to blow things up just like Sid. And Sid is definitely not pure evil, given he didn’t realize that toys were alive when breaking them, but since the movie is from the perspective of toys, he can be considered an antagonist, albeit one of the least evil. But for Al, I’d say he’s more towards the middle. Sure, he’s a jerk and didn’t try to hurt anyone, but stealing is against the law and he never seems to learn his lesson and believes the planet revolves around him. Ordinarily, being a collector is a hobby, but stealing a valuable from a yard sale when the host makes it clear that it’s not for sale is a no-no. So, I’d say that Al is way worse than Sid, despite his intentions to keep toys pristine and repair any damages. Both of what they did was not to be condoned, but it’s hard to argue that Sid might need help, given the ongoing counter argument over Sid’s parents.
Sid yes, but Al is a bad guy.
The Toy Story series is truly special.
Not only because of the characters, but also begin an era of CG animation as we know today.
I know some of these villains are clearly understandable by their motives, but oh my god! Lotso is clearly an truly bitter character.
Are you excited about the new sonic movie!
@@LegoLuka-nx5xe yep.
I can tell because your back round is sonic
I wasn’t talking to you, but you do
Disney is just gonna milk it forever.
Pixar Cars Villains Evil To Most Evil
Evil: Miss Fritter
More Evil: Jackson Storm
Most Evil: Profesor Z
@Kevin Green exactly. Professor Zundap was just the sidekick
SuperBaddy4 Says: Milles Sir Axel Rod Is Sidekick
NO HES NOT!!!
Miles Axlerod is the main villain, Zundapp is only his sidekick.
Least evil:
Mutant Toys (Turned on the villain)
Al (Just a greedy businessman)
Sid (Doesn’t know the toys are sentient)
Ken (A liar who redeemed himself)
Gabby Gabby (Had motives)
Evil Buzz (Under control from Lotso)
Big Baby (Killed Lotso in the end)
Bensons (They’re terrifying)
Emperor Zurg (A galactic conqueror)
Ron Talkins (Al but even worse)
The Clerick (Power hungry)
Stinky Pete (Geez!)
Lotso (Tried to burn our toys alive!)
Big Baby didn’t kill Lotso. He threw him in a garbage bin for his lies and abuse. Also, Ken was not a liar, he and Big Baby were completely manipulated and abused by Lotso, who used them as his henchmen. And Demo Mode Buzz does not count because those were Lotso’s actions, not Buzz’s.
Burning 🔥 toys lotso ruthless
@@brandonscott5544 agreed
Zurg was just goofy and Utility Buzz was the same lol
Gabby Gabby (nice), Lotso Huggin Bear (mean) and Stinky Pete (in-between)
You forgot about Bonnie.
Andy asked her to take care of Woody, his most precious toy, and she didn't. Shame!
Bonnie is not a villain. She just didn’t play with Woody as often, that’s why he stayed with Bo Peep at the end of Toy Story 4.
Facts
Woody should of went with Andy
@@mrfredwilford facts
@@mrfredwilford Andy *chose* to give Woody away to Bonnie instead of taking him to college.
6 Ice Age Movies Sinner Medals
Darwin- Scrat
Greed- The Shangri Llama
Gluttony- Lone Gunslinger
Lust- Scratte
Envy- Manny
Wrath- Captain Gutt
Sloth- Granny
Pride- Prancer
on the other hand. if Sid still had those tendencies that wasn't grown out off, he would have moved up to applying the same torture to people in ways that would make Jigsaw feel impressed.
Hazbin Hotel good to evil-
Most Good😇: Charlie Morningstar.
Grey zone😟: Angel Dust.
Most Evil😈: Sir Pentious.
@@goddessbettyd5614 How is that possible?! Hazbin Hotel has several villains, we don't even know who's the satan of the show.
I've always thought the same. There was one episode of SVU where the older brother was bullying his sister by brutally wrecking her dolls, then escalates to drowning a dog and holding another kid hostage at gunpoint. I don't think Sid was right in the head until the toys scared him straight.
He's... A kid. Kids do wild things with their toys. This isn't the case of a sadist torturing animals, he's expressing his imagination on inanimate objects.
@@etcetera1995 there's some wrong with that kid. That's NOT normal, especially blowing them up.
Finally a Toy story villains videos
Pixar villains evil to most evil a remake
Sinner medals:
Darwin-Darla(finding nemo)
Wrath-Chef Skinner(Ratatouille)
Pride-Ercole Visconti(Luca)
Envy-Randall(Monsters Inc)
Greed-Ernesto De la Cruz(coco)
He already did that, but are you talking about a remake?
Yes
A remake
@@beetlejuice831 Oh, okay
@@beetlejuice831 I don’t think WickedBinge does remakes of previously existing videos.
Woody got Sid what he deserves to play nice.
But Sid doesn’t know he hurting his toys there objects
I forgot Toy Story had so many villains
Zurg only makes amends with New Belt Buzz and not the old one so remains his arch enemy, even as a toy and a villain in the rest of the franchise due to him being popular.
That’s correct. Zurg even claimed himself to be Utility Belt Buzz’s father and they bonded in the climax of Toy Story 2 as the original Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys rushed to the airport to continue their journey to rescue Woody.
@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 Don’t count it. I’ve come to believe that Zurg is only a Buzz-exclusive villain.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 Thank you. I do wish Woody would encounter Zurg sometime in the franchise once the former resumes his villainy. He's a Toy Story character you know. Rex encountered him.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 Zurg is also a Toy Story villain so he'II remain in the franchise to appear more and Woody could encounter him one day. It would be great, wither you think so or not.
Thomas and friends sinner medals
Darwin: scruffy
Envy: d261
Arry and bert: gluttony
Lust: diesel
Sloth: splatter and dodge
Greed: bulgy
Wrath: diesel 10
Pride: spencer
Wait what? Why making toy story villains? Nobody does that and that doesn’t make any sense they’re are like 4 or 5 villains in 4 toy story movies
They are around 10 counting secondary vilains, minor and two TV specials. So in my opinion just enought.
I fail to see the problem with your first point. So what if nobody did it? That makes this an original video.
It’s crazy how much worse Stinky Pete and Lotso are compared to the rest of the villains.
Well, Stinky Pete is actually less evil than Lotso. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity as kids never bothered to purchase him from a toy store and the rising popularity of space toys contributed to the termination of the Woody’s Roundup tv series. He was also distrustful of children due to Woody and Jessie’s respective situations with Andy and Emily, believing that children destroy, neglect and give away toys as they mature. He believed that The Konishi Toy Museum was the safest place for The Roundup Gang to live and only wanted what was best for the cowpokes and Bullseye. At least he redeemed himself in an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters, expressing his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and their lives are solely bound for the trash. His excuse for harming and imprisoning innocent toys was petty and all over Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush, due to Daisy accidentally losing him at a rest stop. Other toys had no control over the situation and weren’t involved with him getting replaced. This sinister plan makes Lotso the punching bag for turning Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acting as the warden, snatching Big Baby away from Daisy, condemning Ken to death when he sides with Andy’s toys and reunites with Barbie and more importantly, nearly sending Andy’s toys to a terrible death at the landfill, even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his heartless pink fur from getting shredded. To me, Stinky Pete is like an overprotective parent or guardian fearing for their child’s safety or an unpopular person in society with little to no friends or has been single all his or her life. Lotso is like a school bully, whose behavior can never be corrected and ultimately results in getting expelled from school or even tossed into prison.
Gee. I should ask you for advice next time I’m told to write an essay.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 However, as this online interview was most likely made by people who weren't involved in the film, it's up to speculate whether this information is canonical or not. So he remains a villain and Woody's enemy in the Toy Story franchise overall.
@@DavidBContentExtravaganza3967 Of course and you copied that from VW.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 Just showing you that detail. Glad you understand my point.
8:01, the fact that they’re scary is utterly irrelevant in a moral ranking
Exactly.
As far as I’m concerned, all of Andy’s toys (save for Bo Peep, Slinky, and Rex inherently) were more antagonistic to Woody than Sid in the 1st film, which is saying a lot. Woody himself wasn’t exactly anything but condescending, but then that accident set them off to be so hostile towards him, which wasn’t helped by all the attention they gave to Buzz in addition to the teasing they gave to Woody. We know that realistically, Sid would only be an antagonist if he were a bully to other kids, besides his sister. But Woody really couldn’t catch a break in the film even if he didn’t let his jealousy get the better of him.
Special mention to Mr. Potato Head
@@Joseph_Drew_III Mr. Potato Head is not a villain. He’s a neutral character. Yeah, he was disrespectful to Woody in the first Toy Story, but let’s not overlook his role as One-Eyed Bart, a wanted money thief. He’s simply cynical and grumpy all the time, although he does constantly prey on Woody’s insecurities.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 This is the first time I’ve seen someone read a reply but not the comment it’s under.
Woody really can’t catch a break in general. He is always getting the short end of the stick and getting little to no sympathy whenever he does.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 According to some references on the movies, it was implied that Potato Head was once Andy’s favorite toy before Woody came along. While it makes sense that he was very much jealous of the attention Woody was getting, it doesn’t make sense that he didn’t feel the same towards Buzz when he was Andy’s new favorite. Honestly we can understand the way Woody was feeling all because of how Andy was playing with Woody changed when Buzz arrived, he treated Woody like fodder for Buzz’s actions, and there’s no explaining that night he put Woody in the toy chest.
As for Mr. Potato Head, he adores Buzz so much, and ruins the moment Bo Peep was trying to comfort Woody, pushing him to confront Buzz. And only he looked up at Woody complaining when no one else did, but then was shocked when Buzz got knocked out the window. What followed was him leading everyone on a mutiny against Woody, threatening him for if he ever returns without Buzz, and leaves Woody for dead after accusing him of “murdering” Buzz.
6 Ice Age Movies Good to Evil
The Good-
Most Good: Roshan’s Mother
2nd most good: Julian
3rd most good: Brooke
Louis
Precious
Roshan
Eggbert/ Shelley / Yolko
Ellie
Sid
Peaches
Easter Bunny
Buck
Easter Bunny
Buck’s Friends
Prancer
Neil de Buck Weasel
Santa Claus
Manny
Tribal Chieftain
Neutral:
Scrat
Stu
Diego
Granny
Mama Dinosaur
Shira
Ethan / Sneffie / other mammoths
Crash & Eddie
Fast Tony
The Mini Sloths
Bad to Evil-
Ronald / Aardvark Boy / other animal Campers
Various Dinosaurs
Carnivorous Plant
Gavin/ Gurdy / Roger
The Shangri Llama
Carl & Frank
Dab
Zeke / Oscar / Lenny
Scratte
The Sirens
Cretaceous & Maelstrom
Lone Gunslinger
Mom / Dad / Uncle Fungus / Marshall
Rudy
Flynn / Raz / Squint / Gupta / Silas
3rd most evil: Soto
2nd most evil: Orson
Most Evil: Captain Gutt
I think also include adventures of buck wild cause is the 6th movie of the franchise
I’d argue Soto is worse than Gutt. The fact that Gutt is so goofy kind of makes him less of a threat in my opinion.
Ok but I also think Gutt is the most evil but he is kinda funny looking but Orson is more funny
@@Werten25 Gutt starts off that way, then when Manny destroys his ship then he becomes evil: also Soto didn’t enslave hyraxes or kidnap all the other animals that’s why Gutt is the most evil
@@Werten25 least evil to most evil : ice age 5 vilains (don't remember their names) < gutt's crew < Cretaceous and maelstrom < rudy < gutt < soto ?
Congrats on your 300th Good to Evil video.👏 Please do Amphibia good to evil. 🐸
It’s actually a good thing that you put Lotso as most evil, since he is Woody’s arch-nemesis
And most hated enemy.
According to his Villains Wiki.
@@AquaTeenHungerForceIsGoated But still true, even outside of Villains Wiki.
The wiki actually says he is the gang’s most hated enemy
@@AquaTeenHungerForceIsGoated Also true.
Prospestor will never forget this lesson of playtime of a change.
Stinky Pete turned out to have redeemable traits as evidenced by an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters where he expressed his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Despite his evil demeanor, Stinky Pete cares about Woody, Jessie, Bullseye and other toys and only wanted what was best for them. While he meant well, he wanted to reside in the museum for his own desire and being free of kid ownership was his problem and only his problem. He is also the first Toy Story villain to be sympathized with because of his tragic backstory.
Which Disney Prince would survive Squid Game and DreamWorks Heroes Weak to Powerful.
15:47, Lotso definitely deserved the distinction of most evil
I couldn’t agree more. Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 lol I actually read that entire comment. And I agree 💯 that Lotso is much worse than literally everybody else on this list
@@BullyMaguire2024 Thank you. I just happen to have common sense about Pixar villains. Heck, I even agree with the Toy Story 3 writers’ decision to punish Lotso. Test audiences who had sympathized with Lotso due to his backstory wanted him to push the button in the incinerator scene to redeem himself, but according to the DVD commentary, director Lee Unkrich explained that Lotso chose not to save Andy’s toys so that audiences who had gotten to know them for three films in fifteen years could care about the heroes even more, when it looked like the end for them, shortly before The Pizza Planet Aliens rescued them with the claw. Thus, Lotso's redemption was dropped. Another reason is because they did not want Lotso to get off so easy.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 even when looking at the thumbnail the first thing that came to my mind was “Lotso is gonna be the most evil”
@@BullyMaguire2024 Well, the thumbnail as well as the crimes Lotso committed were what obviously made him the most evil Toy Story villain. It’s hard to argue with that.
4:23 Wasn't surprised at this. Not even a little.
Same. He not only redeemed himself but he also had no idea the toys were alive.
I was actually expecting him to be the least evil. Because I don’t consider the Mutant Toys to be villains since they just appear creepy but don’t do anything actually bad.
-Babe (and Pig in the City) Characters: Good to Evil 🐖🌃
-Tiny Toon Adventures: Good to Evil
-The Secret of Nimh: Good to Evil
-The Last Unicorn: Good to Evil unicorn 🦄
-Mune: Guardian of the Moon: Good to Evil 🌙
-Paulie (1998): Good to Evil 🦜
-Robots (2005): Good to Evil 🤖
-Osmosis Jones: Good to Evil
-Cats Don’t Dance: Good to Evil
-Meet the Feebles: Good to Evil
-Watership Down (1978): Good to Evil 🐇
-Balto (1995): Good to Evil
-UHF: Good to Evil
-Freakazoid: Good to Evil
-Freakazoid: Dumb to Brilliant
-Tiny Toon Adventures: Dumb to Brilliant
1upbinge:
Pac-Man World 1, 2, & 3 Characters: Good to Evil
Sly Cooper Villains: Evil to Most Evil
They should also make
- Rio Characters Good To Evil
- Cloudy With a Chance Of Meatballs Characters Good To Evil
- iCarly Characters Good To Evil
- Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil
- Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil
- Epic Characters Good To Evil
- Victorious Characters Good To Evil
- Bee Movie Characters Good To Evil
@@pbsfundingaddict790 Yes!
@@cuddlyfox980 Which Stuart Little villain do you think is the most evil? Smokey from Stuart Little 1, Falcon from Stuart Little 2 or The Beast from Stuart Little 3: The Call Of The Wild?
@@pbsfundingaddict790 I say The Falcon would be the most evil Stuart Little Villain.
@@cuddlyfox980 Why The Falcon?
Tbh the moment when Lotso was gonna go through that shredder when he was stuck (and if I was Woody) I would just leave him there because I would think should I really help the person who got me and my friends here in the first place and I still wonder what would’ve happened if they stayed up on the magnet conveyor belt and how did they manage to get Slinky down if every other metal thing was still stuck
Well, they tried to give him a choice to either do the right thing and change for the better or stay evil and bitter, but Lotso chose to stay evil and bitter when he chose to leave Andy's toys to die.
Inside Out Characters: Good to Evil
Good:
1. Bing Bong🥇
2. Riley's Parents🥈
3. Sadness🥉
4. Fear
5. Riley's Teacher
6. Disgust
7. Joy and Anger
Grey Area:
8. Mind Workers🥉
Bad to Evil
9. Security Guards🥈
10. Jangles the Clown🥇
But are any of the characters truly evil? I’d say Good to Heroic is more fitting.
@@elibridgers2781 Jangles tried to kill our iconic trio for cryin' out loud!!
Inside Out Has No Evil Characters
If anyone's wondering, this is why I ranked Joy and Anger together and in the good tier. I know what you're gonna say, Joy should be ranked lower because of how she treated sadness or anger should be lower because of what he did to Riley, but hear me out. Yes, Joy treated sadness poorly, but it wasn't her intention. Same thing goes for anger. The reason why I ranked them in the good tier, is because even though they are what made Riley worse, they still love Riley, and they want her to be happy and as safe as possible.
@@BullyMaguire2024 Remember this: "Without sadness, there can be no joy"
I know Lotso is the most evil villain from Toy Story but his backstory was just sad
I think Big Baby should've been on the list. I think your next video should be on Treasure Planet. So we know for sure if Mr. Silver really is a villain or otherwise.
Big Baby wasn’t intentionally evil. He was completely manipulated by Lotso, who didn’t want him to stay with Daisy just because she replaced him with another Lotso plush.
How is big baby a villain
@@Sidthekid-l1t Lotso manipulated him into believing that Daisy replaced them and Chuckles The Clown, when in reality, only Lotso got replaced.
Just like Ken, he follows Lotso's orders and catches any toy who escapes. But he turns when he realized that Lotso is a monster and lied to him about Daisy. Big Baby and Ken are kind of the same.
Do these Good to Evil or other ideas
- Fish Hooks
- My Gym Partner's A Monkey
- Open Season
- Symbiotic Titan
- American Dragon: Jake Long
- Rocket Power
- The Life and Times of Juniper Lee
- Ben 10 *old show
- Indiana Jones
- Rocko's Modern Life
- Mucha Lucha
- Cartoon Monkeys
- Cartoon Business Owners/Managers *both Cartoon and Anime
- Good to most Good Rick and Morty
- Evil to most Evil Cartoon Assassins *both Cartoon and Anime
- Evil to most Evil Cartoon Bullys *both Cartoon and Anime
- Evil to most Evil Star Wars: The Clone Wars
- Weak to Powerful Cartoon Superheroes *both Cartoon and Anime
- Weak to Powerful Cartoon Supervillains *both Cartoon and Anime
- Which Ben 10 Character Would Win Squid Game? *old show
- Which Hey Arnold Character Would Win Squid Game?
- Which Tom Kenny Voice Character Would Win Squid Game?
- Bart Simpson Deeds
They should also make
- Rio Characters Good To Evil
- Cloudy With a Chance Of Meatballs Characters Good To Evil
- iCarly Characters Good To Evil
- Honey, I Shrunk The Kids, Honey I Blew Up The Kid & Honey, We Shrunk Ourselves Characters Good To Evil
- Stuart Little Characters Good To Evil
- Epic Characters Good To Evil
- Victorious Characters Good To Evil
- Bee Movie Characters Good To Evil
How would've guessed that Lotso would be most evil?
Well he is literaly a hypocrite who wasted his chance for redemption and turned a kindergarten into a brutal prison for toys.
His "tragedy" is not an excuse.
He is literaly the only villain considered pure evil.
@@kacperaskawski3461 100%
@@kacperaskawski3461 Exactly! He was far from sympathetic despite his backstory. If you think about it, Lotso didn’t really care about Daisy herself, but only the attention that she gave him. Sure, he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but he had no right to snatch those two innocent toys and take his anger out on other toys, especially Andy’s toys. Not to mention that he ditched Andy’s toys to die in the incinerator portion of the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his hypocritical pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. What Lotso did was virtually inexcusable and unforgivable. Other toys had no control over him getting replaced whatsoever. Imprisoning innocent toys, even if they had owners and sentencing Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill was not the solution to getting what he wants. It’s hard to sympathize with a villain like Lotso, due to his immaturity and the way he handles grief.
@@WatWhatWat who's worse losto or rumplestulskine
@@JuJu-bq9uq Id say Rumplestiltskin
Thanks so very much. I was waiting for something like this for a very long time.❤️
Ken would've stayed on the bad side if it wasn't for Barbie
That’s correct. Ken most likely only obeyed Lotso out of fear and uncertainty of what toxic punishment Lotso would’ve given him.
@@BullyMaguire2024 Hey, thanks for subscribing to me! Check out my latest videos and you can comment on my community posts!
@@pbsfundingaddict790 yw
1:25 Sids Toys
2:41 Gabby Gabby
4:21 Sid Philips
6:09 Emporer Zurg
7:11 The Bensons
8:15 Ken
9:39 Ronald Tompkins
10:40 Al McWiggin
11:55 The Cleric
13:00 Stinky Pet
14:14 Lotso Huggin Bear
Thumbnail:
3. Sid Phillips (The Evil) - 10. Stinky Pete (The Evil) - 11. Lots-o'-Huggin' Bear
lotso is such a good villain
What do you mean good.There is no good villain and (sorry if I’m being rude)
@@caripavel6225
What Vika’s trying to say is that Lotso was effective at being villainous.
@@elibridgers2781 , @The Nebula Guy & @Cari Pavel Lotso indeed was the most evil villain in the Toy Story franchise. He was a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
Yeah
Al: I can't believe I have to drive all the way to work on a Saturday
Also Al: *lives right across the street from work*
Yep, I laughed my ass off at that. We can’t gloss over how lazy Al is. He complains about driving to work on Saturdays, despite Al’s Toy Barn being located across the street and he could easily walk to there and back.
@@pbsfundingaddict790Though because Al is a total fat ass he wouldn't have walked to work even if he was paid a million dollars.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 he also falls asleep with cheese puffs dust all over his fingers and his breath smells so bad, he burps in his own sleep
A other reason why Al is more evil the Ronald is that he bullied Andy’s dad. I’m not kidding about that.
The toy story franchise is by far Pixar's greatest creation! 😁
Why are you even including mutant toys? They were never evil, they just thought that, they didn't even do any bad deeds to be included!
I know you probably won't see this but I hope someone does.
I know he's just from Andy's mind, but I would include 1-eyed Bart and maybe Evil Dr. Pork Chop, er- MR. Evil Dr. Pork chop for fun.
I just feel like it's worth mentioning how One-Eyed Bart literally blew up train tracks to try to kill a bunch of orphans so Woody would let him get away with the money. That is almost as bad (in many ways a lot worse) than anything Lotso has done.
Also Attack Dog with Built-in-force-field and One Eyed Betty
11:44, he’s also generally unpleasant if the airport scene is representative
I missed this was wondering when you where going to do the villains of the toy story series
Jim Carrey characters good to evil
Dads Good To Evil (Cartoon, Live🎬, Anime And 📹🎮)
Toy story villains evil to most evil my list
Less evil
16 The mutant Toys
15 Gabby Gabby
14 Rextamis maximums
13 Sid
12 One eye Bart and evil Dr porkchop
11 Zurg
10 Utinidey belt buzz
9 Ken
8 Lostso's gang
More evil
7 The Benson's
6 The clerics minions
5 Ron
4 Al Michigan
Most evil
🥉The cleric
🥈Stinky pete
🥇Lostso hugging bear
My thumbnail
Less sid
Most stinky pete
Most lostso hugging Bear
SMG4 characters good to evil?
There are huge amount of characters to be ranked in
truth
Smg3 gonna be middle tier
Lotso deserves the Top Spot! 14:17-15:33
I couldn’t agree more. Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 I saw that same comment in the reply section of another comment. I see you copied and pasted it.
@@BullyMaguire2024 Just trying to make a point about Lotso. Nice that you’re aware of that.
4:24, Sid caused more harm to the toys than Gabby did but unlike Gabby Gabby he had no idea that they were alive whereas she did. Therefore she should have been placed higher than he was.
No, Caleb had a valid reason to rank Sid higher than Gabby Gabby, compared to this.
Sid Phillips is a disturbed kid who tears apart toys for horrific experiments. He will never stop and will go as far to even mutilate his innocent sister Hannah’s toys, including altering her Janie doll with a pterodactyl head. He even fed a Pizza Planet squeaky toy alien to his ugly dog, Scud, who also did everything he could to stop Woody and Buzz from escaping the Phillips residence. But you gotta look at things contextually. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
Gabby Gabby is an isolated pull-string talking doll who yearned to have what Woody had: kid ownership. Much like Stinky Pete, Gabby Gabby’s backstory was extremely disheartening, but she wasn’t distrustful of kids, unlike Stinky Pete. She moved on to find another child to spend her life with, unlike Lotso. Not to mention that her friendship with her henchmen, The Bensons was authentic in contrast to Lotso’s hasty friendship with the Sunnyside toys. Although it was sad that she was ultimately rejected by Harmony, it was unbelievably satisfying when she finally got the love of a child that she wanted for God knows how long as a result of comforting a lost girl at a carnival. While her schemes of risking the safety of Forky to obtain Harmony’s attention were inexcusable, Gabby Gabby’s plans were far from sinister and she was mostly misunderstood. Every toy, with a good or bad personality deserves to be loved by a kid, even Gabby Gabby, despite her misguided nature.
Exactly
@@BullyMaguire2024 That’s a fair response but Gabby Gabby basically committed child kidnapping on Forky so I would still rank her as worse than Sid
@@matityaloran9157 but how would Gabby even know that Forky was made the day before she kidnapped him? Also, toys don't age, so they live for infinity and beyond unless someone like Sid gets their hands on them and does something like what Sid did to that combat carl.
@@matityaloran9157 I also realized that since Gabby wanted to steal Woody’s voice box she essentially wanted to rip out one of his internal organs. So yeah, she’s worse than Sid.
In my honest opinion, she’s very overrated.
Next pls do my little pony good to evil
Good: fluttershy
Grey Area: discord
Evil: Tirek
I guess not that many of these villains were toying around
Death Note Characters Good to Evil
Good: L😇🍰
Neutral: Ryuk
Bad: Misa🔥
Evil: Light Yagami/Kira 🔥😈
"the villains are what appear to be nice guys but with sinister hidden motive"
That's like most of modern Disney villains for a long time by now
Do shrek villains evil to most evil
11.The Mutant Toys
10.Gabby Gabby
9.Sid Phillips
8.Zurg
7.The Bensons
6.Ken
5.Ronald Tompkins
4. Al McWhiggin
3.The Cleric
2.Stinky Pete
1.Lotso
Thumbnail
3. Sid Philips (The Evil) - 10. Stinky Pete (The Evil) - 11. Lots’o (The Evil)
I think Lotso is the most evil toy story villain
Nah I think Sid is
@@Sidthekid-l1t @Joseph Walker
A Simple Summary Of The Toy Story Villains
Sid Phillips is a disturbed kid who tears apart toys for horrific experiments. He will never stop and will go as far to even mutilate his innocent sister Hannah’s toys, including altering her Janie doll with a pterodactyl head. He even fed a Pizza Planet squeaky toy alien to his ugly dog, Scud, who also did everything he could to stop Woody and Buzz from escaping the Phillips residence. But you gotta look at things contextually. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
The Evil Emperor Zurg was just as deluded as Buzz and admittedly was a hard villain to defeat, even for Rex. Since Zurg was a minor antagonist in Toy Story 2, there’s really not a whole lot to say about him. Even after Rex accidentally knocked Zurg over with his tail inside the interior of an elevator at Al’s apartment, he wasn’t the kind of villain that needed to be punished. It was incredibly satisfying to see Zurg bond with his supposed son, Utility Belt Buzz by playing catch, although Utility Belt Buzz declined to continue the mission to rescue Woody from Al and Stinky Pete.
Al McWhiggin is a big thief donning a ridiculous chicken costume who has no patience for anybody or anything that gets in his way. The first boundary he crossed was stealing Woody from the Davis’ yard sale after Andy’s mom made it abundantly clear that he wasn’t for sale. Additionally, his manners towards public businesses are atrocious such as when he hastily dialed and demanded the cleaner to fix Woody, even though he never agreed on a specific date or time he was available. This is also evidenced by him yelling at the airport staff to be careful with his Roundup Gang collection. Let’s also not gloss over how lazy Al is. He complains about driving to work on Saturdays, despite Al’s Toy Barn being located across the street and he could easily walk to there and back. Not to mention inadvertently falling asleep on the couch and dropping his bowl of Cheetos on the floor, which was a failed attempt for Woody to retrieve his severed arm. The only nice thing we can say about Al is that unlike Sid, Al hates when toys get broken and wants them in perfect condition to earn as much money as possible. Like Hamm says “Crime doesn’t pay.”, which is a lesson that Al will unfortunately never learn.
Stinky Pete is a resentful prospector doll because kids never bothered to purchase him from the dime-store shelf that he spent years on and the rising popularity of space toys contributed to the termination of Woody’s Roundup, a children’s western tv series that he was once part of. He was also distrustful of children because of Andy accidentally ripping Woody’s right arm and Jessie getting donated by her former owner, Emily. He believed that children destroy, neglect and give away toys as they mature. When Woody decided to go back to Andy after Buzz lectured him, Stinky Pete snapped and locked both cowpokes and Bullseye in Al’s apartment, revealing his true colors. Since Al planned to sell the Roundup Gang to make a profit, Stinky Pete came to the conclusion that The Konishi Toy Museum in Tokyo, Japan was the safest place for the Roundup Gang to live to prevent further disappointment and destruction from children. From Stinky Pete’s perspective, if kids didn’t want him, they can’t have him and it’s too late for kids to reconsider their choices. His selfish attempts to stop Woody from going to back to Andy were almost always successful until at the airport when Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys rescued Woody and sent Stinky Pete away in the backpack of a girl named Amy, much to the prospector’s horror. Stinky Pete turned out to have redeemable traits as evidenced by an online interview after Toy Story 2 hit theaters where he expressed his gratitude over his new owner, Amy, despite all her makeup and tattooed Barbie dolls. Despite his evil demeanor, Stinky Pete cares about Woody, Jessie, Bullseye and other toys and only wanted what was best for them. While he meant well, he wanted to reside in the museum for his own desire and being free of kid ownership was his problem and only his problem. He is also the first Toy Story villain to be sympathized with because of his tragic backstory.
Lotso is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
Gabby Gabby is an isolated pull-string talking doll who yearned to have what Woody had: kid ownership. Much like Stinky Pete, Gabby Gabby’s backstory was extremely disheartening, but she wasn’t distrustful of kids, unlike Stinky Pete. She moved on to find another child to spend her life with, unlike Lotso. Not to mention that her friendship with her henchmen, The Bensons was authentic in contrast to Lotso’s hasty friendship with the Sunnyside toys. Although it was sad that she was ultimately rejected by Harmony, it was unbelievably satisfying when she finally got the love of a child that she wanted for God knows how long as a result of comforting a lost girl at a carnival. While her schemes of risking the safety of Forky to obtain Harmony’s attention were inexcusable, Gabby Gabby’s plans were far from sinister and she was mostly misunderstood. Every toy, with a good or bad personality deserves to be loved by a kid, even Gabby Gabby, despite her misguided nature.
Barring Sid, Zurg & Al, these toy villains not only act as a foil to Woody, but all of Andy’s toys. They can also act as a darker or lighter reflection of the villains from the franchise. For example, if Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys left Woody to be sold to the museum instead of saving him, then Woody would’ve ended up like Stinky Pete and never returned to Andy. If Jessie, Buzz and the rest of Andy’s toys never let go of the fact that Andy’s mom mistook them for trash and threw them away, they would’ve ended up becoming like Lotso. Not every toy in the franchise was lucky to have a kid like Andy or Bonnie. Like Woody says, a toy’s occupation is a child’s plaything. Sans Gabby Gabby, a toy’s purpose is a lesson that Stinky Pete, Lotso or any true toy villains will never learn.
@Joseph Walker Yep, Lotso was the most evil Toy Story villain. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash.
Nah Sid’s a good kid who is just misunderstood & has a sad life since I can relate to him in real life. Lotso is definitely the worst evil Villain in Toy Story History in all of Pixar in my honest opinion
@@pbsfundingaddict790 true
Do monsters inc villains evil to most evil
If the Mutant Toys were gonna be counted, I feel like Lotso's Gang (Sparks, Twitch, Stretch, Chunk, and Big Baby) should have been counted. Demo Mode Buzz Lightyear is also, arguably, a villain.
Demo Mode Buzz is Andy’s Buzz, Lotso just reprogrammed him to make him his slave. Also, Lotso’s Gang wasn’t intentionally evil, they were unaware of Lotso’s true nature until Andy’s toys came along and Woody revealed the truth about the cold-hearted teddy bear. More importantly, Lotso lied to Big Baby, who was rightfully Daisy’s toy and Lotso snatched him away from her because he was replaced with another Lotso plush and Big Baby wasn’t replaced. Like Woody said “She replaced *YOU* ! And if you couldn’t have her, then no one could! You lied to Big Baby and you’ve been lying ever since!” This basically means that Lotso believes himself above other toys and if he doesn’t have an owner, then no toy deserves to have an owner. WickedBinge didn’t count The Mutant Toys, Lotso’s Gang (save for Ken) or Demo Mode Buzz Lightyear probably also because they didn’t have enough of an influence on the Toy Story franchise.
@@pbsfundingaddict790correct, DEMO mode Buzz Lightyear is not a villain because Lotso just reprogrammed Andy’s Buzz to think he was an actual space ranger so he could convince Buzz that Lotso and the other daycare toys worked for Star Command and that Andy’s other toys were minions of the evil emperor Zurg so Buzz thought that he was doing the right thing being a hero locking up Zurg’s prisoners, he thought that he was serving the Galactic Alliance so DEMO mode Buzz only counts as an antagonist not a villain.
DreamWorks Hero's Weak to Powerful
Weak: Z
Powerful: Po
WickedBinge, I love this ranking! Lotso is the most villain of the Toy Story Universe!
that’s great that you love wickedbinge and I also like it
Lotso was indeed the most evil villain of the Toy Story universe. He is a self-absorbed teddy bear who was stuck in the past and filled with violence all because of one kid. Sure, you can’t blame him for feeling disappointed about Daisy replacing him with another Lotso plush since she lost him at a rest stop and he felt that Big Baby and Chuckles still rightfully being under Daisy’s ownership was rubbing it in his face, but Lotso drowned in his heartbreak and had no right to snatch those two innocent toys from Daisy. Despite his backstory, Lotso is ultimately a Toy Story villain who was hard to sympathize with due to his unforgivable actions. It was also ridiculous how he transformed Sunnyside Daycare into a prison and acted as the warden. He issued wrongful punishments against toys for the most ridiculous reasons including attempts at departure from the campus, disagreeing with his views and helping other toys escape. Furthermore, he nearly sent Andy’s toys to a crummy death at the landfill even after Woody and Buzz sacrificed their lives to save his guilty pink pad of stuffing from getting shredded. If not for The Pizza Planet Aliens, that would’ve been the end of Andy’s toys and possibly the rest of the franchise. You could make a convincing argument that Lotso was much more dangerous and vile than Stinky Pete, amidst their mutual spitefulness. Stinky Pete only became a villain out of resentment and insecurity and wanted to be loved by children from behind glass, rather than being owned by just one kid. Lotso simply became a villain out of trauma and entitlement with a dreadful theory that toys don’t deserve to have owners and that their lives are solely bound for the trash. Bottom line, Lotso and only Lotso got replaced by Daisy, not Big Baby, not Chuckles, nor any of the Sunnyside toys and especially not even Andy’s toys. Other toys had no control over the situation and they didn’t care what Lotso had been through and it wasn’t even their fault. Daisy replaced Lotso because he was her favorite toy, but alas, he didn’t see it that way and he probably only cared about the attention she gave him, rather than her feelings. From the perspective of Woody, it’s okay to feel annoyed by other less-deserving toys who have owners, but the fact that Lotso mindlessly harmed innocent toys was not the solution to getting what he wants.
6:51, I would put Zurg in a lower spot than Gabby Gabby since even though he is actively trying to harm Buzz Lightyear it’s just because that was how he (as a supervillain action figure) was programmed and he doesn’t have any actual choice.
But unlike Gabby Gabby, Zurg actually attempted to kill Buzz Lightyear.
@@BullyMaguire2024 That’s true. The difference is Gabby Gabby’s foul deeds were her own choice
@@matityaloran9157 her foul deeds weren’t really that bad though. All she does is try to steal Woody’s voice box and kidnap Forky and even then, she still treated Forky with affability and was nice to him.
@@matityaloran9157 well, I’ve changed my mind about Sid and The Bensons being more evil than her, but I still think Zurg is more evil than Gabby since despite the both of them being bog standard, Zurg attempted murder which is worse than what Gabby wanted
Please do Thomas & Friends Characters: Good To Evil. (& while you're at it, please give the *Gold Medal of Good* to Thomas & the *Gold Medal of Evil* to Diesel 10)
WickedBinge doesn’t always give The Gold Medal Of Good to the main characters. It’s how they measure morality. For example, SpongeBob was ranked in The Good, but wasn’t The Most Good, due to his childish behavior and lack of self-awareness.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 & some main characters got the gold! Thomas can be cheeky, yes, but everyone has to have fun (if only I ever could!)!
@JamieGamePlayThrough WickedBinge said that they’re going to do Thomas and Friends on Good to Evil at some point and if you don’t believe me go check out the comments of the Rick and Morty Moments: Gruesome to Most Gruesome video
@@thiagopena3258 I don't not believe you. I just didn't know.
@@thiagopena3258 Really?
8:16 HE’S A DOLL, DUDE!
HES NOT A DOLL JOSEPH!!
Sid's character really is an interesting case to look at, and so I really appreciate the humanistic insights you made about him. Twisted and demented may only be scratching the surface, but there's a theory floating out there that his experiments with the various toy parts could have been some kind of emotional outlet given that his parents aren't shown to be as attentive or caring to him.
I agree with you. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
Sid's mom makes him pop tarts. He got all the care he needed.
@@migfire Did you forget about the part where he skateboarded to Pizza Planet all by himself without any parent or legal guardian?
16:04, love and lust aren’t the same thing
Exactly. Love is selfless, while Lust is selfish.
@@elibridgers2781 since lust is merely physical attraction whereas love involves caring about someone as a person
Sorry but I disagree Sid isn't evil. He might be a jerk but he is not evil. Look Sid's life he lives next store to Andy with the seemingly perfect life, with the perfect house, friends plenty of new toys, a mother that takes care of him.
What do we know of Sid's life? His house is in crappy condition, his yard is a mess all he has is a bunch of old toys, we don't see a parent around, he has a reputation. He obviously has a creative side with how he takes toys some of which are broken and makes them into other toys. Turning those toys into other toys is probably an outlet for him that helps him forget about his crappy home life for a little bit.
The finally Sid has no idea that toys are alive, then Woody comes along and shows Sid that they are. What do you think that would do to a person knowing that for years they have been torturing living creatures and not knowing it.
In the credits for one of movies if I remember correctly we see Sid happily working as a garbage man, so he has obviously become a productive member of society.
So no Sid's not evil.
@Kevin Green @thepayne78 I thought the same thing. From Sid’s point of view, toys are not alive. Of course, he still holds on to this belief up until the end of the first Toy Story when Woody and the Mutant Toys formulate a plan that not only succeeded in scaring Sid, but also in rescuing Buzz from getting blown up on a dangerous handheld rocket. Little did Sid know that toys really are alive, even when breaking them and it’s really not appropriate to see him as the sadist that we think he is. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
Ghostbusters good to evil
2:49, Gabby Gabby should be placed as more evil than Sid was since Sid had no idea that the toys are alive whereas Gabby Gabby did. (Even if Sid were the more harmful of the two.)
Exactly
Hey can you do me a favor?
@@BullyMaguire2024 Depends on what you’re asking
@@matityaloran9157 for some reason my comment keeps getting deleted so I’ll try to sum it up as short and simple as I possibly can.
@@matityaloran9157 okay no matter what I do my comment keeps getting deleted. Do you have discord?
shrek villains: evil to most evil
@Big Vinny
I’d say Rumpelstiltskin would be the most evil.
@Big Vinny But according to the Shrek Characters Good To Evil video, Lord Farquaad was the most evil.
@Big Vinny This is how WickedBinge ranked the Shrek villains:
Least Evil - Prince Charming
🥉3rd Most Evil - Rumplestiltskin
🥈2nd Most Evil - The Fairy Godmother
🥇Most Pure Evil - Lord Farquaad
@@pbsfundingaddict790 but rumplestulskine is way worse
Toy Story Villians Good To Evil My List
Good
🥇:Sheriff Woody
🥈:The Mutant Toys
Grey
1:Mr Potato Head
2:Utility Buzz Lightyear
3:Big Baby
4:Sid Phillips
5:Gabby Gabby
6:Ken Carson
7:The Monkey
8:Lotso's Henchmen
9:Emperor Zurg
Evil
7:Mr Jones
6:The Cleric's Henchmen
5:Ron Tompkins
4:Al McWhiggin
🥉:The Cleric(3rd Most Evil)
🥈:Stinky Pete(2nd Most Evil)
🥇:Lotso Huggin' Bear(Most Evil)
I liked seeing the specials in here too!
Tbh, I wasn't sure where Zurg would be vs his Star Command OR Lightyear versions, but placing him in the lower tier makes sense since like you said, he makes amends and ends up having father and son time.
The guy from the Halloween special is creepy, but not the same creepy as it may sound when you mention a stalker or something. It's so scary how his lizard appears to venture around the hotel, goes into each room, and then steals toys from kids (and heck, maybe even antique collectors!) to bring back. I couldn't find any words to describe him other than "creepy", but y'know.
Kinda sad to not see some other henchmen of Lotso's - like Twitch and Chunk - but I'm assuming it's because they had very minor roles and were mostly seen just talking evil, doing a simple task such as holding someone still, or watching from afar as stuff happens. So I guess it makes more sense to leave Ken but otherwise, no one else since there were little to no actions from them.
Thanks for making this list! My order from least to most evil would be:
Mutant toys
Scud (Sid’s dog)
Utility Belt Buzz
Gabby Gabby
The Besons
Zurg
Sid
Big Baby
Ken
Al
Stinky Pete
Lotso
Also could you please do Harry Potter & Fantastic Beasts villains evil to most evil?
The Buzz Lightyear from Toy Story 2 that thought he was a real space ranger is not evil at all he was just a minor antagonist because he thought our original Buzz was a space ranger who betrayed him.
I think you should do a Turning Red characters weak to powerful! 😁 just a suggestion
I love the music at the end of this video
Do Meet the Robinsons Characters Good to Evil
Please do a Squid Games video of My Hero Academia
Nickelodeon Movies Villains: Evil to Most Evil.
7:51, well, that’s not fair at all. Their creepiness is no way interchangeable with their evil
I know and it annoys me that people who make these kinds of videos use those dumb excuses. Like for example, taking into account how successful the villains were. Being successful has nothing to do with morality. Another thing is not being taken seriously. Or being a coward. Like a lot of people make videos of Disney villains evil to most evil and they always seem to give Prince John a free pass simply for being a coward and it rly annoys me.
@@BullyMaguire2024 You’re right. Incompetence isn’t a virtue. And neither is cowardice. All that points to is that to be a successful villain there must be some vices that they don’t have (like sloth).
@@BullyMaguire2024 If the video you’re referencing is the one I think you’re referencing I watched it and posted comments on it but I wasn’t on it inasmuch as I haven’t made or appeared in any UA-cam videos
@@matityaloran9157 but still weren’t you on that video? I thought I saw many comments of you on that video.
@@BullyMaguire2024 I did post a lot of comments on that video yes. (I was just confused by what you meant by “were you on that video) since I wasn’t sure if you meant appearing in it or posting an online comment about it but yes I did post comments on that video.)
I would say Ronald Tomkins is far worse than Al McWhiggin. Consider that Al only committed that one single crime(bad drivingnot withstanding), stealing Woody, only did it as a last resort after seeing an opportunity, only did so after attempting to purchase him legally and offering a more than reasonable sum for him, and only because he had an incredible but very narrow opportunity for which obtaining said doll was a necessity. Ronald Tomkins on the other hand had been systematicly stealing from his customers for quite a while, and selling their possessions. This wasn't some spur of the moment thing, he literally trained his pet to steal from customers! He basically made selling stolen toys part of his motel's business model, which in my opinion is far worse than a single crime of opportunity and desperation.
I agree tbh
Toy Story: Dumb to Brilliant
Dreamworks Villains Dumb to Brilliant.
I'd put the dummies adjacent to Gabby is some fashion. Based on the master/servant relationship, I'd argue that they're guilty of the exact same actions. The argument for Gabby's redeemable traits is a legitimate argument, but one could argue that the loyalty shown to Gabby by the dummies is similarly redeemable.
I'd also list Sid as being a bit more evil than he's listed here (switch him with Zurg), for being a bully to his sister.
Exactly! Gabby Gabby’s friendship with her henchmen, The Bensons was authentic in contrast to Lotso’s hasty friendship with the Sunnyside toys.
2:14 look at the zombie hand lol.. YESIR 👌
Family/American Dad/Regular Show characters: Dumb to Brilliant
South Park Characters: Dumb to Completely Brainless
Family Guy/American Dad/Futurama/South Park Villains: Dumb to Brilliant
Professor Farnsworth/Stewie Griffin/Sandy Cheeks inventions: Dumb to Brilliant
Eric Cartman's manipulative schemes: Dumb to Brilliant
Adult Cartoon Heroes: Good to Most Good
less good - Meg Griffin, Jeff Fischer, Philip J Fry
more good - Bob Belcher, Butters Stotch
most good - Lord Nibbler, Mysterion (Kenny McCormick)
Hunger Games trilogy deaths: Gruesome to Most Gruesome
The Lord of the Rings/The Hobbit trilogies deaths: Gruesome to most Gruesome
Cartoon Superheroes from non-superhero cartoons: Good to most Good
Cartoon Supervillains from non-superhero cartoons: Evil to most Evil
American Dad Parents: Good to Evil
Pure: Greg Corbin
Good: Roger Smith, Ma Ma & Bah Bah Ling (Francine's adoptive parents)
Neutral: Stan & Francine Smith
Bad: Jack Smith, Connie & Ted Robinson (Barry's parents)
Evil: Nicholas & Cassandra Dawson (Francine's birth parents), Henry Fischer (Jeff's Father)
Regular show relationships: Healthy to Toxic
Bojack Horseman relationships: Healthy to Toxic
Best South Park Celebrity parodies/roasts
Best South Park Christmas themed episodes
Eric Cartman/Butters Stotch deeds: Best to Worst
Times that South Park got censored
South Park Seasons: Best to Worst
South Park POST COVID series characters: Good to Evil
Pure: Rabbi Cartman
Good: Tolkien Black, Wendy Testaburger
Neutral: Kyle Broflovski
Grey Area: Stan Marsh
Bad: Clyde Donovan, Randy Marsh
Evil: Victor Chaos (Butters)
Family Guy Chicken-Style Fights: mild to most destructive
Cartoon Birds/Bears/Rodents/Fish (not including Klaus Heissler because he is a man trapped in a goldfish's body): Good to Evil
Cartoon Punching Bags: Least abused to Most abused
Cartoon Bosses/Principals: Good to Evil
Cartoon Presidents: Good to Evil
Which Bojack Horseman character would win Squid Game?
Which South Park character would win Squid Game?
Which Pixar character would win Squid Game?
DreamWorks Villains: Dumb to Brilliant 🧠
Toy Story Villains: Evil to Most Evil
The Evil
1. Mutant Toys
2. Gabby Gabby
3. Sid Phillips
4. Emperor Zurg
5. The Bensons
6. Ken
7. Ronald Tompkins
8. Al McWhiggin
9. The Cleric
10. Stinky Pete
11. Lots-o'-Huggin' Bear
Thumbnail
3. Sid Phillips (The Evil) - 10. Stinky Pete (The Evil) - 11. Lots-o'-Huggin' Bear (The Evil)
Diary of a wimpy kid original trilogy good to evil
Please do ice age villains
You have to understand Sid was just a troubled kid with an abusive dad and needed a creative outlet to vent, Woody was the actual villain of Toy Story 1 and he was redeemed.
One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
Good list. No notes.
Except one note: Where's Big Baby?
Big Baby wasn’t intentionally evil. He was completely manipulated by Lotso, who didn’t want him to stay with Daisy because he got replaced by another Lotso plush. Despite Lotso taking him away from Daisy, Big Baby eventually got fed up with Lotso’s abuse and selfishness and grew to residing at Sunnyside Daycare and was possibly in good hands with Barbie and Ken.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 so then why would you rank him as Bad to Evil?
Toy Story Villains Least Evil to Most Evil: The Gold 🏅 of Least Evil goes to Gabby Gabby The Silver🥈of Least Evil goes to Big Baby The Bronze🥉of Least Evil goes to Sid Phillips The Benson Dummies Ken Emperor Zurg Lotsos Henchmen The Bronze🥉 of Evil goes to Al Mcwhiggin The Silver🥈 of Evil goes to Stinky Pete the Prospector The Gold🏅 of Evil goes to Lotso
3:23, she kidnaps Forky (who seems to be effectively a child) and plots to steal Woody’s voice box from him.
But she treats Forky with affability plus she only wanted to be loved by a child. Also trying to steal Woody’s voice box is her worst crime which makes her super bog standard
@@BullyMaguire2024 I’m not going to give her brownie points for being nice to the person she kidnapped
@@matityaloran9157 she was nice to Forky when she didn’t actually need to do so such as when she put his arms back on correctly
@@matityaloran9157 the Villainous Benchmark Wiki has her treating Forky nicely as a prevention.
What about Sids Dog? And what about the other Buzz Lightyear that Buzz encountered in the 2nd movie
Scud was just an ugly and mindless dog constantly preying on the destruction of Woody and Buzz and Utility Belt Buzz was basically just Buzz in his delusional space ranger mode.
Dogs have the urge to chase and it’s in Scuds instincts, and Ultra Buzz was more of an antagonist than a villain.
Cartoon Network 2010 Villains: Evil to Most Evil
Sid should've been adopted because his parents never took care of him
You read my mind. One could argue that Sid might have had everyday home issues, leading to this incorrigible behavior. However, this is only a theory that his father might have been overly negligent and addicted to alcohol to nurture him. He might have also just been a kid with some behavior problems of his own that were impossible for anybody to work out. Sid might be the opposite of Andy, but we all have had friends or witnessed a couple of strangers just like Sid, don’t you think?
Toy Story 4 is the only movie in the series that didn’t have a climax. The 1st movie had the scene with Sid in the backyard, the 2nd one had the airport scene and the 3rd one had the trash compactor scene
Yeah, I’ve noticed that. It was most likely because Gabby Gabby wasn’t as serious as Sid, Stinky Pete or Lotso.
@@pbsfundingaddict790 the 4th movie didn't really have a true villain
Toy Story Heroes Good to Most Good
Least Good Hamm, Good Woody, Most Good Buzz Lightyear
I think Mr. Potato Head was the Least Good Toy Story hero. But in another WickedBinge video regarding all Toy Story characters, Rex was the Most Good.