Max Tegmark - Events and the Nature of Time
Вставка
- Опубліковано 29 лип 2024
- Are events measured by time? Or is time created by sequences of events? Which is more fundamental, events or time? Worse, we may get different answers from quantum mechanics and general relativity.
Click here to watch more interviews with Max Tegmark bit.ly/19LefkO
Click here to watch more interviews on events and the nature of time bit.ly/2v3TDQ0
Click here to buy episodes or complete seasons of Closer To Truth bit.ly/1LUPlQS
For all of our video interviews please visit us at www.closertotruth.com
Max Tegmark is awesome........ cool channel, great content
Max is the man
science is friggin spiritual ... it just keeps unveiling the wonderment ... Max is a favorite, dude lays it out
Max is always great to listen to!
Mister max is a fantastic teacher.
maybe the more general feature is that any two particles have some capacity to interact, and our notions of time and space have emerged only to express that capacity. So no absolute time or space, first you need things in the world that are capable of interacting. Once those things exist, time and space emerge as metrics to describe separation - or the degree to which any two particles are not undergoing an interaction.
Omg amazing
As I was walking down the street one day
A man came up to me and asked me what the time was that was on my watch, yeah
And I said
Does anybody really know what time it is (I don't)
Does anybody really care (care about time)
If so I can't imagine why (no, no)
We've all got time enough to cry
(Chicago 1970)
Your so lucky you get to talk with all the smartest people. I would say your on his level at this point. I feel like your key to probing out the TRUTH. All these great scientists are so focused they may trap themselves in their ideas. It's possible that they may have solved a truth but didn't realize it. Im sure your the BEST at asking the right questions 🤔💡❤️
I absolutely love Max Tegmark.
Play it a 0.5 speed for deeper insight.
I'm with Max, no block universe.
The core is harmonic regularity, the outer darkness is random noise, we are in the space between them. Every engine takes advantage of a difference. These two extremes are woven into each other. The eternal now is the processing of meaning.
drive.google.com/file/d/0B1t3dP66nJluckxPcUVteEs3MnM/view?usp=sharing
My take on Nurture of Time: is as follows, it's a by-product of the expansion/impact of (photon exhaust)creating a Space-Time kinda Plasma; as Space -volume expands and compresses Dark Matter against Photons as a result. [This comment was submitted by David R. Noble Whitecrow on 07/31/2022@2300
Search on UA-cam: Kinetic theory of fluids journal.
The word 'reality' trips blithely from the lips of many who think they know it.
But if we knew reality we'd have no need of science.
We cannot grasp "reality", only our own thoughts.
Thoughts are purely analogical resembling clouds more than crystals.
Some assert thoughts are what reality is made of.
Hard to argue but madness lies in that direction.
Language is pretty tricky in its dynamic distant depths and
I'd rather write than speak impromptu so I say kudos to you.
ttyl
Which conference are they talking about ? And does there exist any recorded talks from it?
Max, you da man!
An event is part of a chain of causation from the present into the future, with the past events in the chain of causation communicated to the present by the speed of light?
Future time is needed for causation and motion? Can there be causation without a future time to move into?
Does an event happen in the present time? When something happens marks the present time?
What is time supposed to be approximating according to Max Tegmark?
Does anyone have the place?
I thank time is emergent from the Quantum Gravity Field as are all particles that make up all matter and all the information as well as all, past, present and future time are inherent and native to that field. The question is, what drives this field if anything and is it irreducible? Planck says yes to the latter.
Jack Pullen magnetric charge
Change is't a shift (both is fundamental to time and space).
What if an advanced species noticed the last dredges of a neighboring Universe evaporate? Would time stop?
Each photon oscillation only occurs once forming an uncertain future relative to the atoms of the periodic table. Such a process will form what we see and feel as a period of time with each moment being formed by a photon electron coupling or dipole moment. The electron is the most spherical object in the universe and we have the future unfolding with each photon electron interaction with perfect symmetry between the matter and antimatter and positive and negative charge.
An artist theory on the physics of 'Time' as a physical process. Quantum Atom Theory I've seen your work. You are one of my best references in consciousness research. I'm curious if observation, collapsing the wave f(x), is what we experience as duplicate or grouping random events....double jinx let's say. If there is an objective reality where an observer is connected to space-time....we're talking all kinds of radical implications.
I’m still trying to get my head around “ imaginary time” and time actually having a shape. Is this evidence of the holographic principle? Did time exist before the Big Bang? And if it did, is time the bridge between General relativity and QT?
Amazing, and thought-provoking. So perhaps there is no time, or even 'space' as a separate value, but only a sequence of 'events' and 'processes' occurring within the ground of 'nothingness'. BTW, the Brit philosopher, mathematician and physicist Alfred North Whitehead thought much the same thing, and built a 'religion' around it called Process Theology.
For many years now I have also thought that time is simply change. All measures of time become irrelevant in a truely changeless universe. A million years will pass and no frozen observer could ever possibly know or measure how much time had passed during the frozen period. Much like ‘Heat death’ you could have ‘Time death’
Mmm... I'm still not convinced. For change to be real, the possibility of it (change) is a prerequisite. For a system to be able to go from state A to state B (or from cause to effect if you want), first it must be possible for it to make that transition, and that "thing" that "allows" it is time, as fuzzy and relative as it may be. Change comes as a consequence of it. I don't think a truly changeless universe can exist, considering how "lively" vacuum actually is. I'm just "thinking out loud" here, not exactly asking you, hehe.
SidneyBloom Interesting, is it “time” that makes “change” possible OR is it “change” that makes “time” measurable or observable? Think about that.. I believe that semantics have a big bearing on a persons view point when thinking about these difficult concepts.
From my point of view, I can’t separate change from time. They appear to be codependent. So much so, that in my mind they are two different words to describe the one same phenomena.
To an observer, time is meaningless without change. However you could also argue that change is impossible without time. I can’t see them as separate concepts.
Yes, I agree semantics is very important here. Even with respect to your last paragraph. "To observe" is a process, I'm not sure if we can define something as "an observer" in a universe without change/time.
SidneyBloom Yes I can’t imagine a universe in a fixed or frozen state that has any observers at all.
If observation is an “event” then it is a “change” in the state of that universe. Time would most likely be required for observation to take place.
SidneyBloom However, I can imagine a frozen observer. eg. a human locked in suspended animation. They don’t or can’t observe anything until time allows change to occur within the physical state of that human mind. That mind can then change and can then “record” changes occurring relative to it and relative to the rest of the universe. Time is the crucial ingredient.
When I ponder the universe I see that nothing anywhere in the entirety of the universe is ever at rest. Absolutely every known particle, every lump of mass, every wave, is moving relative to most of everything else in the universe. “Rest” can only appear to exist when something’s motion is very closely synchronised to an observers trajectory through space time. From my point of view the concept of “rest” is a human fiction which doesn’t really exist anywhere at all, in this universe, ever.
🌌 Space and time are conjoined twins with the *highest* degree of fusion-there’s no space without time and no time without space. 🤓
if we choose x0 = ct, x = vt then dimensions are consistent. time cannot be eliminated
Is "space" expanding or is "time" slowing down? Or maybe both are true? "Space expanding and "time" slowing down? Or maybe our solar system is being pulled toward our galactic center's black hole giving us a relative perception of an expanding universe?
I can explain what time is !!! 🧐🧐🧐
it means that is emerging
property of universe. is it a human artifact to measure change .isn't fundamental?
9
Time is the sequel of all events
There are two things that is matter was it there before even before the universe existed and next is what is the interaction between matter and space
If matter existed then it was a infinite long line of thin strand. And if space interacted then it creates disturbance in mass by push and pull And it splits line to strands and shreds so that a clump of the mass was produced like clay models and spun around. Space was created because of the void.
These interaction throws light
It's his normal speech. He's from Sweden I believe. Always interesting.
The Bar matron got mad when you said there will be no change.
The fuzz of time..
In 2040,would an advanced computer that asks itself questions, be bothering to ask such questions?
Is not time just a riddle that humans invented to confuse themselves? Apart from being able to measure time,
in ways taught it by humans, would this computer have any awareness of time? Our mortality is what makes time so important to us.
Would a computer have such a sense of impermanence?
No, it would not. Unless we FORCE AI to think like us...
...funny thing: if that is true any thing else loses its meaning too and then we were right, referring to us as the Nihilists...
What is Time?
1. Assume the three dimensional
Universe is inside a three dimensional photo Frame. Everything in this universe
is dynamic and changing in relative to other things and itself. Entropy is
changing also.
2. The whole Universe inside the
frame marked as Now Moment is separated from previous Now Moment by shortest
possible separator Planck-time.
3. Last Now Moments are Record,
History, Memory or Information. Next Now Moments are next changed states of the
Universe inside Frame.
4. Only Now Moment Exist. Past and
Future do not exist. Flow of Time forward or backward does not exist. No arrow
of time. It is arrow of Change with elapse of Time. Moment is ticking
repeatedly at Planck-Time interval with a new 3D-Photo of the Universe.
5. Conscious Mind can make
predictions of next Moments from experience and can plan events for next
Moments.
6. Every Planck-Volume’s “Now” of
the Universe including space and stuffs in it is always in the same Now Moment
Frame of the Universe. Relative Clock ticking, fast or slow, at different planck-volume for different conditions does not shift anything to previous or next Moment Frames of the Universe. Because clocks ticking slow or fast does not mean Time elapsing slow or fast. It is error of the clock for certain condition which need to be adjusted. All points Now remain in the Now Moment Frame of the Universe. That is why twins of paradox can meet at any ones Now though
relatively they are backward or forward in respect of amount of time elapsed.
Time travel is not possible. Our invented Clocks and Calendars are misleading
us about time in the repetition of day & night and seasons.
7. The Unit by Clock is three dimensional at any
point of the Universe. X axis: Universal Period of Time, Y axis: Passage or
Elapse of Time and Z axis: Local Present or Now. Our Clocks only show one
dimension: passage of Time. Clocks are good measuring device with a Unit but that is not Time.
If time has Planck time as the smallest physical unit, then this would mean that time is discrete, and not continuous, which essentially means that integrating and differentiating equations with respect to time in QFT is meaningless....
The Buddha would probably come and shake his hand.
@Chand Bellur Modern religious Buddhism has almost nothing to do with what the Buddha actually said and taught.
@@ShinMadero Same with Christianity etc.
This is confusing for non-physicists. Looks like Tegmark shaken by his awareness of reality as it is; fuzzy.
Max descends a staircase.
Reality is paradoxically both too simple and too complex to be encompassed by formulae.
Ditto, time. We supposedly have ''events'' in ''real'' time.
Quantum Gravity ="Quantum/Classical Switch"..Or "Our Legal System"..All objects are viewed as "Equals" on the way down..But once on the ground "You Are Judged".."Weight Becomes A Discrimination Process"..Now the heavier object is "Discriminated Because It Requires More Energy To Lift"..Quantum Spin..??..Same thing ="Equals"..But know the position of "One Photon"..??..Now you "Know Or Discriminate Against The Answer Of The Other"..Drop "Any" 2 objects..??..You trigger a "Quantum Switch"..(Psst..Do it now Max..)..Take care..Bye..
FQXi
so...after the video they both looked at there watches and went to there next scheduled meetings or appointments...in thus the whole conversation was a complete waste of time itself
He is drunk
Sometimes I look forward to the heat death of the universe.