This person does not believe in an objective truth and seeks to unseat the idea of an objective truth. That is the essence of the Post-modern approach.
This is meaningless: if everything is constructed then at least the mechanism of how to make others believe, of convince or share must be real, otherwise we don't have any kind of communication and people would keep disagreeing with each other. To make someone believe, the mechanism of believing must pre exist and must be in accordance with someone pleasure or pain: no one can be taught to die or to kill himself so easily. Rather than say a pile of nonsensical things this guy should study some natural sciences, and history of ideas: seriously though.
To be honest, communication between people is technically impossible. Everything that I write is going to be interpreted by you though your own lenses. so, technically, the only thing that is possible is coherence between my and your lenses, which may come from similar life experiences. But in this case we are not even communicating, we are just being on the same 'frequency'
This is great, I enjoyed a lot. Thank you!
Thankyou for this, I really enjoyed it.
great job
This person does not believe in an objective truth and seeks to unseat the idea of an objective truth. That is the essence of the Post-modern approach.
Where did you get the idea that postmodernism denies objective truth?
It is social constructionism
This made me smile because it describes how I see reality as well and it's always nice to know I'm not alone in this kind of thinking. So thank you.
Really, really sorry for you: you neglect history, nature and interaction among those.
This is meaningless: if everything is constructed then at least the mechanism of how to make others believe, of convince or share must be real, otherwise we don't have any kind of communication and people would keep disagreeing with each other. To make someone believe, the mechanism of believing must pre exist and must be in accordance with someone pleasure or pain: no one can be taught to die or to kill himself so easily. Rather than say a pile of nonsensical things this guy should study some natural sciences, and history of ideas: seriously though.
To be honest, communication between people is technically impossible. Everything that I write is going to be interpreted by you though your own lenses. so, technically, the only thing that is possible is coherence between my and your lenses, which may come from similar life experiences. But in this case we are not even communicating, we are just being on the same 'frequency'
It is defining by non-essential characteristics
wise and hot, exellent combo !
Social constructivism cognitive constructivsm / index for subsequent study
What a load of bollocks.