Biblical Patriarchy - Session 4 - Eric Conn | Blueprints for Christendom 2.0 2024
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 кві 2024
- Tune-in to Eric Conn's talk on Biblical Patriarchy from the 2024 Blueprints for Christendom 2.0. Conference.
Over the next few months we will be releasing one of the talks from our Blueprints for Christendom 2.0 Conference. Subscribe and click the bell to be notified when they release.
A sermon everyone should hear!
Wonderful, wonderful message!!! Thank you so much!!! Soli Deo Gloria!!!
Sourdough! So much fun! 🙌
We need more bold men who speak the truth
Excellent
Eric Conn preaching some fire!
Brothers and sisters, this is EXACTLY the admonishing we need to hear today in our culture. Since big eva and Russell Moore stopped talking about biblical patriarchy years ago, glad Eric Conn and Co. have done a superb and winsome job continuing the Christian tradition from way before the 80's.
All that Eric does seems to have some 🌶️
Great talk!
So helpful and so necessary
Great video !
This message is so timely! One of my wives really needs to hear this.
😂
This is a badly needed message in churches today! Biblical Patriarchy is God's design. "We use words like headship, but they mean nothing." We encourage women to work outside the home and relegate childcare to strangers who care far less than any parent should. Many churchgoers blindly adopt the world's narratives of the day to great consequence for their marriages, children, entire family and communities.
To be honest here are some verses that debunk the patriarchy: Here are a few Bible verses with explanations that challenged patriarchal norms:
Galatians 3:28: "There is no longer Jew or Gentile, slave or free, male and female." Paul is emphasizing our unity through Christ transcends all human divisions or hierarchies. By grouping "male and female" without qualifier, he affirmed their equality counter to patriarchal differentiation.
Proverbs 31: The portrayal of the wise "woman of valor/noble character" running businesses, helping the poor, being respected, etc. was radical in a society where women lacked worth outside marriage/motherhood. It celebrates female capability, dignity, and leadership.
Ephesians 5:21: "Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ." While submitting to husbands was cultural, Paul balances it by saying all Christians mutually submit "to one another" in relationships. This combats patriarchal logic of male domination/ownership, instead advocating humility, care and dignity between all people regardless of gender or role.
Luke 10:38-42: Jesus being taught by Mary and Martha subverted societal assumptions women couldn't hold positions of student/disciple or engage deeply with religious doctrine. His inclusive, non-hierarchical, and relational teaching elevated women's dignity counter to patriarchal restrictions.
@@HeartOnHerSleeve
Galatians was describing how Christ isn't just for one group, but for all who receive him in faith. Read the whole chapter as a single chapter and this is clear. That was poorly cherry-picked.
Proverbs 31 describes an industrious housewife. And it would be clear to any first temple Jew (its original audience) reading/hearing the poem that she was contributing to her husband's household/estate. The bible was written withing the cultural context of its authors. The emphasis of the poem is on her husband's regard for her, and her charity and lack of idleness as a housewife.
Ephesians: you forgot the verses that come directly after. 22-24: Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands.
That was a bad cherry-pick.
Luke: this passage describes Jesus as the teacher, not the one being taught. You should read it.
Calling it a bad Cherry pick isn't a proper defense. It comes off dismissive nor are you defending your claims of why it was a bad explanation. Christ in his ministry uplifted women. Paul when he was speaking to his audience was saying women and men among every other race were equal in God's eyes. It implied more than just faith aswell. It's ironic because this pastor is trying to justify controlling behavior and twist scripture.
@@HeartOnHerSleeveThe verse he cited completely demolishes your claim. Wives are charged to submit to their husbands in the same fashion as they are to submit to Christ. There is no charge for men to do the same for their wives. Don’t let your personal feelings get in the way of God’s word and His structure for human life. Adam was formed first, Eve was designed to be Adam’s helper. If you have a problem with that then you need to pray and submit to God. We all love you, sister. You are not less-than, you just have a different form and function than men and we both have our specific roles to follow.
@@HeartOnHerSleeveIf our roles don’t matter and there’s no more male or female, can men be women? Can husbands be wives? Can fathers be mothers? Should women fight home invaders while the men hide with the kids? See how fast that ideology falls apart.
🔥
Leadership IS a service, but the service is not to an individual, it is to the whole collective. A father serves his family BY leading them. A pastor serves his congregation BY leading them. Imagine an army with no general. Now imagine you are a general who must obtain and control a certain objective. Would you rather have a collection of undisciplined and undereducated street criminals; or would you rather have well disciplined, highly organized, logical, and capable men to turn into soldiers…? Now imagine you live in a culture that ONLY produces the street criminals, but you’re a general and have been assigned those undisciplined street criminals and have been tasked with a mission AND a timeline anyway… how would you speak to them to get them in line?
100%. And the church encourages this insubordination, especially among wives. And men get to go home and deal with it. Wanna know why the church is 61% female? This is why.
Great analogy
would have liked to hear more scripture, i feel to many pastors of old were brought up when scripture should be instead
Preaching this message though it might be true, to young men without "Husbands love your wives" could have a dangerous outcome. Yes young women are sinners and so are young men. He is bigger physically than she is. Should she submit to him? Yes. He also needs to love her as Christ loves the church. Without the emphasis on both to young men, it will probably be disastrous.
Why would any woman want to be loved like an organization? Tax deductible at that.
Pretty sure that aspect of the relationship is not ignored
I was guessing and guessing, Russel Moore didnt even make the bottom of my list of joke answers
Eric is less the hair-on-fire heretic than his detractors would have us believe 😏
would love to see one of these guys finally call out the effiminacy of neck ties
Yeah - it’s so difficult to tell them apart from all the women who wear them 🤦♀️
This is what you're concerned about an article of clothing? It's a tie. That's not a sin to wear that. This is grasping at straws at this point.
@@tracycroll4325 Wouldn't you agree that it is more appropriate for women to adorn their bodies with fashionable articles that serve no function?
The effeminacy of neck ties? The history of the neck tie goes back to the crevat, which in turn goes back to a type of neck bandanna worn by Croatian mercenaries. Male formal wear, from suits, to ties, to boots, all has its origins in military attire, and from a time in history where militaries were 100% men.
@@HartyBiker Let's not appeal to antiquity. Somebody should have called out that nonsense hundreds of years ago. I doubt the rank and file embraced the trend, probably imposed by some fruity officer type. Yes, they've always existed even in the military. And yes, they've always been influential in formal fashion as well.
Contrast this with the curse God pronounces on Eve in Genesis 3:16: "Your desire shall be contrary to your husband,
but he shall rule over you.”
Got blessed mankind with patriarchy, then seemingly cursed it with feminism.
God didn't create the patriarchy nor did he curse the world with feminism. This is such a weird and unbiblical take.
@@HeartOnHerSleevecope
That's your only reply is "cope." You're not my husband and you don't get to tell me what to do. Grow up you're not a man you're a coward. You can't reply with any scriptural evidence to back up your claims. I respect men who are not abusive, not narcissistic fools.
@@ogloc6308
@@HeartOnHerSleeve Where did you get this from? You have a very poor understanding of scripture to think this ?!? God created and intended patriarchy as set out carefully in the Bible. Sin gave us feminism. Sin gave us abuse of patriarchy.
@@HeartOnHerSleeveThere is no order or structure to God's creation ?
Cool 😎
Not a great analogy at the beginning.
Which analogy was that? I'm curious and struggling to find it?
I like ambiguous comments based on the internal dialog going on in someone's head without a timestamp or context...
@@virtualpilgrim8645I don't get your point 😏
he actually sounds really gay lolllll
As a woman of God. I'm lucky to find a man who loves me. He doesn't want to control me or dictate what I do. Truly I'm disgusted that these preachers want to control women instead of loving them like Christ.
Edit: I'll add on that I have no issue with a man being the head of the household. I have an issue with him using his authority to abuse his wife and control her every move. I'm talking about to the point she has no autonomy. If this isn't what you believe then that's fantastic. I needed to clarify this I have no issue with biblical submission. I have an issue with abuse.
Does Christ tell you what to do?
Sounds like you found yourself a real servant leader there, who let's you do what you want. In my house we serve the Lord. His standards dictate what we do.
You're threatened by me not wanting to be abused. He's more of a leader than you'll know. I don't entertain narccists. Have a blessed day.
Christ doesn't want women to be scared of him. Nice try though.
@@elshaddiliben193mostly He tells us what NOT to do. Which is a husband’s role for his wife as well.
I lead a small men’s group of about ten guys.
I often feel like I’m starting from scratch when it comes to the issue of Patriarchy.
Most modern day Evangelical men have no idea what we’re talking about when we teach on such things.
We’ve got a lot of work to do.
If I may ask. What if women decide to stay single and not marry. This movement is going on now. Many women are staying celibate. At the end of the day no one can force anyone to be in a relationship.
@@HeartOnHerSleeve
If a women “decides” to stay single, then she is to commit herself 100 percent to the service of God and the church through her gracious, charitable, relief work.
This is a unique calling and not very common among women.
Id say thay exists among nuns too. There's missionary work aswell. However, God may have a calling in her life just as he does with anyone. It could be in her worklife too.@@westyso.cal.8842
@@westyso.cal.8842I'll say God first and yes she can make that choice for herself. Unless we go back to have arranged marriages which wouldn't bade well then yes she has a choice to stay single.
@@westyso.cal.8842 she should be socially shamed in the church till she humbles herself to serve Christ fully or a husband fully.