Angela Rayner's council house controversy, explained | Kate McCann
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 лют 2024
- “The bigger questions that have emerged this week are about why Angela Rayner has registered herself at different addresses at different times.”
Political Editor Kate McCann lays out the controversy around Angela Rayner’s council house.
📻 Listen to Times Radio - www.thetimes.co.uk/radio
📍 Subscribe to our channel - / @listentotimesradio
🗞 Subscribe to The Times www.thetimes.co.uk/subscribe/...
📲 Get the free Times Radio app www.thetimes.co.uk/radio/how-...
One thing is certain - Never (never never) give a politician the benefit of the doubt, their trade is abusing people's trust and filling their own pockets, don't give them a second chance
I predict her hubby will say it was his oversite and pay the tax but a blind man on a galloping horse can see what went on
She’s on the fiddle like all the rest of them.
The principle here is that an embittered socialist takes advantage of the right to buy, having previously supported a Labour leadership whose avowed intent was to pull that scheme, thus preventing anyone having the same opportunity.
So she and Starmer are saying capital gains tax is for the general public. And Not for the labour elite! Good bye Labour!
None of it explains why we haven't allowed councils to take out mortagages and buuld homes since the mid 1970s
Paying tax is for “little people” ! 😡🇬🇧
As well as any capital gains discrepancy, I'm speculating that they've also tried to get a discount on their council tax. If they were both registered at their own properties, they'd both be entitled to the 25% single person discount on each of them. If they lived together, they'd have to pay the full amount on the one they both lived in.
She is the worst of the worst, and she might get into a position of power, just give that a bit of thought. 🤔 🇬🇧 Ps. Tax is only for the little people. 🤔
ooooooo this is going to get tasty. We all know why she did it, to pay less tax.
You're supposed to live in a council house for a certain length of time after buying it. If they owned the other house first then they had no rights to be in a council house let alone to buy it.
If an MP was found to have carried out tax evasion would that be a resignation matter, would the matter be placed in the hands of the committee who investigate standards in public life and potentially lead to a recall petition?
She don't need to worry it'll be dealt with by an independent person who after will get a cushy job with the labour party 🤔
Nothing will happen, we all know that.
Just like ALL politicians from ALL parties, snouts in the trough,and they dont have to adhere to our standards
Sounds like a tax scam
it's simple she is a two faced hypocrite, her brother lived at the property she should have paid CGT, and took a local authority property using the right to buy for personal profit.
Absolutely Obvious! George Orwell summed it up, 'we are all equal but some are more equal than others' so what does that tell you about this politician?
Another question is how many postal votes did they receive for the 2 properties?
We used to call it "Ducking and Diving"