Killers of the Flower Moon Reviews Are Out! | World Premier Reaction
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 вер 2024
- Martin Scorsese's new film, his western Killers of the Flower Moon, is based on David Grann's novel of the same name.
Killers of the Flower Moon stars Leonardo DiCaprio, Robert De Niro, Jesse Plemons and Brendan Fraser, and looks at the 'reign of terror' - in 1920's Oklahoma, the Osage native American tribe begin being killed off one by one.
The movie has had its world premier at the Cannes film festival, and critics have given their thoughts on the film. It seems most critics consider Killers of the Flower Moon a masterpiece and one of Martin Scorsese's best movies, though a few critics are disappointed in the film.
We don't know how many more films Scorsese has left in him... I know he's working on Wiseguys but knowing how long it takes this guy to drop a film we'd be lucky if we got 2-3 more films from him. Hoping for this though... Cinema isn't the same without Scorcese.
He’s not working on wise guys, that’s Barry Levinson’s film
@@Unbiasedboxing1 Yes, I figured that out. 😆😆😆
I don't mind keeping the comment up anyway!
Scorsese's gift/burden is that he adores the art of film too much to make a poor picture.
Probably the best way to put it.
Tell that to Goodfellas 2: The Return of Jafar.
@@jamesstanchfield2212 king of comedy is great and the only one high is you.
The Irishman was not good.
His movie about Jesuits in Japan stunk!
The parallel to the Tulsa Race Massacre is what captivated me about the David Grann book, which I personally regard as a true masterpiece.
I have heard that there is some comparison with Tulsa at the end of the film. Don't know if it is so.
I always expect Martin Scorsese movies to be long. That doesn’t bother me because I have to wait so long for a new Scorsese picture to come out I go see it willingly give the film my time.
I listened to the audiobook of the bestseller true story a few years ago. In Scorsese’s hands, this will be an epic for the years.
Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this important film. Scorsese spent a great deal of time working with the Osage Nation and descendants of the victims and others to ensure they were portrayed respectfully and correctly. He hired many Osage and Indigenous to work as actors as well as behind the scenes as cultural consultants, carpenters/painters, caterers, costume department, etc. Scorsese and the film are getting rave reviews from the Osage and others who were at Cannes for the premiere as well as those descendants who were intimately involved with the film who can now start sharing some of the background details now that the film as premiered at Cannes. I am really looking forward to seeing this historical film.
i believe these words and i think marty is that kinda dude after all he comes from an ''othered'' people - from what i have seen it looks very accurate which might turn certain ppl off - fk them - these untold stories need to be brought to light americans need to know the real history of that continent
If by 'othered' people you mean Italians or Sicilians to be exact I agree totally being the exact same nationality as Marty. If I may say one more thing about that, no matter what your ancestry or Heritage the level of empathy, love& respect for others should not be conducive to your ancestry
@@stiofanmac right,absolutely!!!❤
I'm big fan of Shutter Island watched about 20 times. The atmosphere which Scorses and Leonardo created in that movie is just so touching my heart so deeply ( especially moment from Dachau). That memory is in my cells from my ancestors. Bless them forever ❤❤❤
It was far from perfect but still thoroughly enjoyable and much better than the tripe that comes out now.
Can‘t help it… i am extremely hyped
* Let's assume it's a masterpiece now - that would be 3 in a row not counting the David Johansen TV doc - The Irishman, the Dylan Rolling Thunder Revue and now this .....who does that at Scorsese's age?
* If DiCap wins - that's 2 BA Oscar at under 50 - I've said this before - he could catch DDL w / 3 BA wins. If De Niro wins, certainly the most deserving actor who only has 2 and who deserves 3 and unlike Blanchett he's at the age where it "makes sense"
* If Gladstone wins .......that's particularly amazing since The Irishman had essentially "no females" (whatever) and be the 2nd Best Actress win he's directed.
Lots of historical weight to this....... and every review is saying exactly what I want to hear
I haven't watched Rolling Thunder Revue so I can't speak on that but The Irish Man is epic in scope and there's about 45 minutes to an hour of the film that I feel was bordering on greatness. Is it a masterpiece? I'm not decided.
The very cultural elements on how this story - and through whose POV - is told - are going to be fascinating to watch in its Oscar chances:
I mean the reviews are awesome imo I'm going to love it I'm sure - but there are big media outlets who are already grumbling about how it's told in their reviews (Variety, LA Times etc). It isn't really how great a movie is - but how great it makes you feel in its components.....
I mean when you have people saying "it's great - but I could see it performing like GONY or The Irishman" - ie losing every nod - it's kind of depressing ......that hurdle doesn't seem like a big deal in May but the argument against this movie has already been laid out tbh........just wait until we get to the end of year.........ugh
The Irishman is Marty's worst film.
@@Jimmy1982Playlists Then obviously you haven't seen "Who's that knocking on my door" or "New york, New york"
The Irishman is easily top 5!!
Thank you Martin Scorses for touching The cruelity true and creates films on facts. It is big relief and therapeutic for all of us who carry on in they genetic material that ancestors trauma. Bless this beautiful soul Martin
I almost jumped out of my seat when I heard that review use "the Sacred and the Profane" outside of a Sopranos reference. How badly did you have to fight yourself not to sneak it in there? We all would have understood.
Like you, i have been waiting for this film for so long. These amazing reviews are just icings on the cake
I don't think DeSantis will approve real US history that reflects badly on some white people. Is the book banned in Florida?
Let me check… nope, ok then I guess that means Ron is a good guy, thank you for this litmus test.
@@The_10th_Man Looking forward to the litmus test coming out blue instead of red.
Looking at the reviews, I hope they win and hit one out of the park! Remember Flower Moon and Gladstone are key to this movie. ❤😊
Looks very special, and i am looking forward to it...but i know that Very Early Reviews of Movies often overhype things....but even so i am still rather excited to see this.... definitely going to avoid spoliers, looks like a movie to savour.
On the Cannes premier for the first time i saw Scorcese being old, like weary old, which is sad. God bless his soul. He gave me one of the most memorable emotions cinematography can give.
What was the moment and in what film, and what was the emotion it elicited? I’m curious
If it’s just as good as Shutter Island, it will be quality.
Shutter Island has of Leo's finest performances in my opinion.
I think if the focus is Robert De Niro and Leonardo DiCaprio and they have the lion share of the film's story, and the trauma and history of the Osage people take the back seat is the reason the story may not have been Scorsese's to tell. Scorsese's was supposed to direct Schindler's List but decided to give it to Spielberg instead. An indigenous filmmaker would've focused on the Osage's people's point of view. It matters who tell stories.
Truth is, at this point the story wouldn't get the coverage it is getting had it been an Osage director. However, if it had to be a non-Osage, the fact that the tribe and families of the parties involved were intimately involved in all the steps and have been pleased with the outcome say a lot. Also, this is one of the keys recently that is opening the doors for more and more tribes/native actors and other components in the industry to be in the industry.
As a descendent of one of the victims and a former Chief of the Osage Nation, my reaction to this review is that our story is told in this film and to counter this reviewer's statement that the amount of attention to the Osage is not clear. I got a preview of the film so I Know a bit about the film. Let me be clear, just because Osages are not in the scene half the time, doesn't mean the movie isn''t talking about Osages. So, I would disagree with his description.
Looking forward to this film, it looks like a classic...Marty & Leo's Dances With Wolves if you will.
Looking frwrd to seeing recent Best Actor winner Brenden Fraser act with these top names too!😮 Another Scorses masterpiece, imagine that!❤
My favorite film is still Jeanne Dielman, 23 Commerce Quay, 1080 Brussels,so I am happy to hear of this masterpiece to be unlike all of the standard highly edited stuff. Thank you Uncle Marty.
Being told the story of the atrocities committed against the Osage Natives by my grandfather when i was young boy it's been a story I've never forgotten and I've told it to so many who had no clue about it and always felt it deserved much more recognition so when the book hit i of course immediately read it and figured the story would finally get out .. the book hasn't seemed to do that as much as i expected but when i found out Scorcese was making an adaptation of it with De Niro and DiCaprio it immediately became one of my most anticipated movies..even at 3h 26m and with 3 legends on board $200 million is steep for the budget but I'm just they made it and to no surprise the reviews are amazing and as much as i love Marvel and the MCU i can't say i don't agree with the old timers and i rather see more original films or films of lesser known events like this one
After reading all the excessive, fawning praise of "The Irishman," I'll reserve any judgment regarding the merit of "Killers" until I've actually seen it. Not all, but too many critics are blinded to, and all too forgiving of, Scorsese's creative shortcomings because of his (mostly) well-earned reputation as one of America's greatest living directors.
The Irishman was embarrassing...so bad. Sopranos movie was worse.
Last Hour of the irishman was Good though
💯
@@WestSideGorilla1980 The Irishman is a good movie! 👍🏻
The Irishman was a great movie wtf. Ill never understand this criticism. Acting was phenomenal all around- especially from Pesci, who quite possibly gave the best performance of his career. .
Scorsese made one MCU comment and people lost their minds over it.
That one critic's comment about the story maybe not being Scorsese's to tell is just a symptom of the identity politics and virtue-signaling that have infested modern criticism and make me not take critics seriously anymore. That said, I'll always give Scorsese the benefit of the doubt and hope the film actually lives up to these early notices. I haven't been truly blown away by a Scorsese film in 30 years--I feel like he's been making good, but not great films ever since his 90s resurgence. Fingers crossed for this one, though.
never forget osage.
My problem with this picture is that it should be at the big screen. Not freaking appletv. That's the reason quentin tarantino was right. I don't even have appletv.
You don't need Apple TV.
It will have a wide theatrical release on October 6 first, then it'll go to streaming later on.
@@princesmith8008 thanks for the update. 👍
@@marcelogabuardi8249 You're welcome mate 👍🏻
The Irishman was a great movie and they never got acknowledged for it
When QT talks about “old man films” he should stop looking at the past with filmmakers like Ford, Hawks and Hitchcock who made way more films than anyone of the modern filmmakers ever will and yes, were burned out once old. He should be looking at the trade records of modern filmmakers, himself included. Scorsese and Eastwood continue to make great cinema.
Can’t wait to watch it, this is will be my first time watching a Scorsese movie in the big screen inshallah
Me too!
If you ever get a chance see a few others too.... I have seen Taxi Driver many times over the years on various size TV's..., but when I saw it in the Cinema it just felt even more powerful, visually and aurally, really something else.
Same here! I have now watched every movie he has made (not documentaries) and im so excited for this movie
@@ChubbyChecker182 Wow Taxi driver in the cinema, I’ve watched the godfather in the cinema and it was something different.
I am glad someone decided to make this movie. I found the best part of the book was the extensive appendix- wonder if the movie presented these facts!
I think we can safely ignore any lukewarm review by the BBC. They're probably just upset the film isn't woke enough. I for one am excited to see this film. Cheers for the review, CineRanter.
FFS shut up with that stupid word "woke". Listen to the review first before you deliver judgement, otherwise how can you possibly know their reasons for not liking it. Anyway I thought the book was excellent and can't wait for it to arrive in cinemas, where I will be watching it, same as I did with The Irishman.
@@tonybennett4159 Intelligent reply. Take your meds, dear - they will calm you down.
One day we'll see a one hour clapping ovation
I was looking forward to your thoughts on this one. I'm looking forward to this much more than I did with the Irishman I felt the Irishman was a major let down and was blown way over the top but I feel this is gonna be brilliant. I hope so anyway but I look forward to seeing it and your take on it when it comes out.
But the Irishman wasn't blown way over the top. It depicted real people, real events although no one really knows the actual conversations or how the hit actually went down. Even Bufalino's family commented on how well Russell's character was done right down to his speech and physical mannerisms.
@@ManoloGalAgreed. Everyone who was let down by The Irishman were expecting another Goodfellas, even after being told they wouldn’t get one.
@@ManoloGal I think most people’s issue was the crappy facial CGI. It was otherwise a superb film. I haven’t cried harder at a film’s ending.
@@ManoloGal sorry I should of been more clear I meant the build up to it with the critics kinda making it out the it was one of his best movies but after watching a few times I did feel it was of his weaker films but that is a great point because the characters in the movie were larger than life so I that is true.
Scorsese, Leonardo, De Niro...all what I can say its ARTS of creating not just good films but explains deep uncomfortable true x❤x❤
It’s a Scorsese film and at 80 he’s unwilling to doing anything short of excellent. He said that Apple did everything they could meaning money was not spared.
I'm actually glad it's being received this well after the media and people took his Marvel comments out of proportion and tried to make him look like a bad guy. Hold your ground Scorsese
Bro you've been following this film for ages.
. Respect
Food for the Liberal horde who think every film that displays America's flaws is a masterpiece.
Fine video and I’m really looking forward to it as this cast ensemble and Director can’t fail
If y’all ain’t seen Scorsese’s film, Silent, I highly recommend it. First time I watched it I just had it on in the background and found it bleh. Second time around I found it a minor masterpiece.
I think Andrew Garfield was miscast in Silence. I think Ben Wishaw or Cillian Murphy would have elevated the film. I could be wrong but that's just my opinion.
@@bolder2009 Yeah I agree. The film's slow pace was also a problem for me. The film doesn't really pick up until Neeson steps into the film. I felt Silence was good not great by Scorsese
I'm dying to see this movie. Although I'm annoyed the story has been high jacked by white male characters. I just hope the Osage aren't made bit characters in their own story. Just would be so much better if the story was focused on them
Esta e para quem gosta de cinema a verdade ê que estamos carentes de bons filmes para cinema temos um monte de filmes lançados, em streaming alguns bons outros descartáveis, por isso ficamos , na expectativa quando surge um grande nome do cinema, lancando,algo para o cinema vamos esperar pra ver, boa sorte a familia Scorsese daqui do meu Brasil um forte abraco ais amantes do cinema da tela grande
I’ll go see KOTFM in theaters!
Yes, that's a must do. I'm sure that's the reason I liked both The Irishman and Roma : no kitchen to go to for a coffee or snacks, no distractions, at least not in the cinemas I went to, just being absorbed by the worlds they show.
I believe Jane Crowser meant to impart “weaving…MASONS (not mansons) into its tapestry”
Thank you for this collection of comments! I can’t wait to see the film. It’s true that good law abiding citizens can be less interesting than the thugs. But I’d encourage you to watch CORSICANA about US Federal Marshall Bass Reeves, a good man, who prevails in this film.
Well it would have to be a lot better than ‘The Italishman’ which was a sorry joke on us all…
Marty's"Once upon a time in america"
If it's a good as that (the full version) I'd be very happy.
I heard the same things said about The Irishman, his worst film... tho I do hope this new film is, indeed, a masterpiece!
I look forward to seeing the film and experiencing it for myself. Film critics bring their own garbage to the criticism of what they are viewing.
This is going to win best picture I’m going to set it up right now either it’s going to be this or Oppenheimer
more likely Killers of the flower moon The color purple or Past lives. Oppenheimer the technical nominations vs Killers of the flower moon i think so but i too early to be said and predict
can't wait for this movie.
why show it 4,5 months early tho
"Martin Scorsese's new film, his western Killers of the Flower Moon, is based on David Grann's novel of the same name."
it's not a novel. it's non-fiction. jesus
Exactly. He at one point called it a non-fiction novel, something like In Cold Blood, but that's way out. KotFM has copious notes, references and bibliography at the end of the book. No novel ever does that.
Id prefer a film that didnt have a social justice theme
It's about the murder and rape of indigenous tribe by people who think it's their God-given right to steal from the innocent murdering sisters by their own trusted guardians that's a special kind of person but these sort of crimes are still going on through technology big or small it's all the same when the law turns a blind eye some victims don't forget
Actually the police do the complete opposite they join In how's that for a heads up on identity theft
I won't give a review until I see the film. The Osage have mixed feelings of this film. There remains so many unsolved Osage murders from this period.
There is no way to cover all of them in one film. A documentary might be able to touch on the multiple families more, but it had to be focused more on a smaller group to tell the story and have it follow a storyline. Even still it's very long. It opens the door for many more projects to highlight the truth and increase awareness. Already, people are more aware of the other books written about the events, and hopefully there will be more.
Killers of the Flower Moon is a masterpiece, a real masterpierce. Its just dang long and maybe too long.
Why would the English who colonized New England and North America give a good review to this film when they are part of the murders, the first being The Pequot massacre and then King Phillips War which were carried out in the English colonies way before the US became a country. You know the conqueror's are going to downplay their roll in this history
I'm good on this movie. I don't think I will waste my time watching it.
The book itself was a little long and boring.
Denero has alienated half the country who won’t forgive him.....the others are in a probation stage bordering on dismissal, the public will not be kind to the movie.
They are ridiculous for continuing to turn a blind eye to historical injustices because they don't like who tells the story.
I hope Scorsese has not gone woke with what could possibly be his last film that would be a great shame 😏
Hes Great, but I think Coppola, is a better film maker.
Been waiting for a min for this one
The lrishman was sh it i hope this is better
Irishman was a piece of garbage
The film is NOT a masterpiece... Scorsese did a absolute terrible job at executing the story into film. The acting of DiCaprio and DeNiro was second rate at best . I went to see this movie with my daughter. People WALKED OUT ! My daughter wanted to walk out but I asked her to stay, saying that it HAD to get better...it never did. Lily Gladstone was awesome, but not used enough. I highly DO NOT recommend.
I loved Silence, but didn’t like the Irishman much.
I can say whatever this man does he’s got the midis touch me because he, definitely knows how to pick reactors Robert De Niro one of the greatest all-time actors since talk and movies( And how about the other actors who has worked with Al Pacino awesome actor Jack Nicholson another great actor then is the second generation .Leonardo DiCaprio actor you’ll be able to Act into his 90s
Leo is not the hero and shouldn't be betrayed that way
What makes you think he's portrayed as the hero? Just because it's Di Caprio doesn't mean he doesn't play villains.
@tony bennett I said shouldn't. Meaning that he was a villain in this story. One of the wolves
Cannes is "artsy fartsy" after that stupid remark I stopped listening, ...if you're a serious film enthusiast don't waste your time.
Irishman was phenomenal even tho people thought it was slow at times the people that didn’t like the Irishman are not educated on films like this and have no attention span they would rather watch a marvel film lol horrible love from TRENTON NJ
Promising!
I'm surprised a lot of ppl preferred Shutter Island over The Irishman. I honestly felt Shutter Island was complete garbage. The Irishman was great and totally enjoyed the picture
There is only two bad reviews for KOTFM and it seems like the criticism is due to the three 1/2 hour run time
Can’t stand De Niro....sorry he is part of the problems we have in this country.Gotta make a stand on not enriching people like him.I am of Native American bloodlines but I wish someone else was playing the role.I know Scorsese is De Niro’s buddy but I say no.I may watch it on a streaming service but I am not paying the full cost to see DeNiro.
What's the problem with De Niro? As far as I'm aware, his character Bill Hale had no Native American heritage at all. He was a nasty piece of work who pretended to befriend the Osage.
Why miss out on the full experience? Aside from that, by supporting the film, it opens the door for more true stories such as this to be shared, and increasing awareness about the events and tht people are interested in those events, and increasing the opportuinities for more tribal representation in the film industry.
Also, id like to point out that Tulsa was a riot, not a massacre. A lot of unnecessary violence and hate in both directions. Thats also been extremely sensualized unfortunately. While the truth and actual mistakes get lost and then releated.
The desire to relive the darkest of human chapters questions the possibility for human sanity.
I’m sure had the film been in competition at the cannes film festival, it would’ve won the palme d'or award.
This is a great example of how many times can you mispronounce words reading text in a video.
This review is the anesthetic of the films misè en scene. In other words the narrator is quick to not comment too much on American covered up history. When this film hits America its not romantic macabre lamentable history that we chalk up to "that's terrible but things are better now" therapy but more intense. When they tie in the other covered up history of the 1921 massacre of black wall street in Tulsa Oklahoma that was based on successful African Americans trying to break into oil bussinress it creates a conspiracy. Then when you realize the blacks killed were actual Creek Nation Freedmen or members of the Creek tribe the hideous nature of oklahoma white people circa 1920s is obvious. But then it gets worse. Those white people who murdered those osage Indians to steal their oil were in fact the big oil names who are billionaires now. Phillips, Sinclair, LaFortune, Sutton, Getty, Marland to name just a few of the 116 people who became overnight millionaires. The very evil that it took to slaughter blacks and Indians cannot go without justice. Especially since SCOTUS gave the Creek Tribe federal status in the McGirt Ruling that is retroactive back to Oklahoma statehood. Oklahoma has to be accountable and so does every single 116 oil tycoons who have lived a life of wealth off the deaths of the innocent. 🤔..
Not everyone who was killed in the Tulsa was a Freedman or member the Creek tribe. Tulsa has always been part of the Creek reservation but the tribe had to go all the way to the Supreme Court to get the McGirt ruling upheld. The Osage murders over oil and headrights has noting to do with the Creeks or anyone else. My mother in-law is Creek and I have many Osage friends in Oklahoma. Don't try to center anything else in this issue.
@@gnostic268 I am not wrong. The freedmen killed in 1921 had just tried to purchase oil shares for themselves. I know that it is a source of shame for Creeks and the other 4 tribes that owned slaves. April 4th of this year I watched as Damario Simmons argued in tribal court to get full benefits for the Creek freedmen. The creeks fought it. I don't care for either. Simmons is a personal injury lawyer who is using the 3 remaining survivors of the massacre as a potential 50% contingency fee windfall. He blew the potential opportunity to start reparation payments the night before the national commemoration would have brought attention to it.
I stood up at a creek tribal meeting years ago and told the Creeks that they respected their elders like all tribes do. They have the Creek celebration in June, rodeo and stomp dances year around. They teach Creek language at OU and their children learn it as well. Traditions passed down from their elders. They all said "mah-doe" (thank you) and "amen" with a few "ah hoe"s mixed in. Then I said their ancestors welcomed in the black freedmen to protect them from the angry white people who wanted their free labor back. So their ancestors let the freedmen into the tribe and you want to kick them out. You don't honor your ancestors at all. You cherry pick what you want to honor. All because of gaming revenue.....money.
I may not like either but I hate the white republican people who profited off of both and continues to do so. The white people murdered for profit then threw a bible at us and said "here learn to forgive us".
Part of forgiveness is seeking accountability.
The Creeks already had 'federal status', that's not recent. What I think you mean is the tate had to acknowledge their reservation was never dissolved and it's still intact, and all the complexities that is bringing about. Not an insignificant portion of that being how the land has been sold and is checkerboarded, as well as juridictional issues of all sorts.
@@rachelallen5534 your absolutely wrong. Not only am I a native american from a tribe that was the only tribe to win a case that created the ACLU. I majored in native american history at the Univesity of Oklahoma. The state gave us no federal status because of the discovery of oil and later natural gas. Our land was called "Trust Lands" so that Oklahoma could oversee our tribes land leases. Trust Land means they held our land in trust. The mcgirt ruling dissolved that status and was retroactive to statehood. Now we are federal and our govenor is trying like hell to not acknowledge he has no control over us anymore. We will eventually apply back taxes and loss of 117 years of lost income because SCOTUS ruled that Trust Lands were fraudulent. As soon as I can have the freedmen make peace with the Creeks thev can charge and seek reparations for the 1921 massacre. It's hard as hell to accomplish that but my disdain for the wrongs are my motivation. To strip those rich white men of their ill-gotten oil money. SCOTUS is terrible about a lot of things but won't turn us down. We are not some bullshit woke group for our history is worth killing to protect. The white folks stole land and then threw a bible at us and told us to learn to forgive them. I am working hard to convince hundreds of tribal members to see that hustle. We also have international support which I started during covid when the true racist intent came out in the Southern Baptist leaders. I almost stopped my pursuit but then I realized the evil in the use of their Bible.
Formalism
BBC review = not enough female actors
interesting--I mean, should the true story be changed to add more? It was the 20s and a male-dominated scheme.
Hollywood always fawns over De Niro. I can’t see it myself. He’s okay, but he must have something on them.
I'm not interested in him one way or the other. Just the movie itself.
Would not go c anything with DeNero in it anymore....bit of a Wally Brain.
I'm thinking that a big mistake that Scorsese will be shown to have made, is minimizing the role of the FBI in the film. That would have shed some light on how they started and where they have ended up today - possibly, the way they are today is actually similar to how they started, and we were just sold on their righteousness throughout the 20th century.. Taking liberties with the true events, to the point of making up what he thinks will be "sexy" to the audience, is not something to praise, in my opinion.
What the hell are you talking about? This is a true story. The book is one version of that story. The movie looks at the story in a more realistic light because it cuts away from the F.B.I white savior story and focuses instead onthe core of the story, which is the relationship between the killers and the victims. Instead of a detective story where we already know who the killers are we get to explore the emotions of the people involved. Thats far more intresting, and closer to the true story.
@@stewartkee6115 It also could have overburdened the story and made it an unwatchable length, and nobody was going to finance a two part film that easily. They even waited to see the response to part one of Dune before green lighting part two.
There are already FBI stories. There aren't Osage stories. The viewpoint and perspective is the angle that needed to be shared. It is an imoprtant piece of the events, sure. But shouldn't be the main focus by any means.
@@stewartkee6115 exactly!
Another "America is evil", movie. Been there done that. Ill pass.
US government covers up hundreds of killings of natives and almost 100 years later snowflakes will cry if you even make a movie of it. Facts don't care about your feelings
Hey. Maybe America is evil. Just saying.
Typical cast for a typical woke movie trying to please a few at the cost of many.
please share what it cost you personally. I don't think many would consider Lily Gladstone and many, many others as typical. Hopefully someday!
@@rachelallen5534 It costs me, personally, the dreaded blow to the gut that Hollywood is almost dead. Every person in here is a woke cupcake and everything they'll be a part of will also be catering to the ideology of the empathetic opinionators that run this country. Too long and they're destroying history by saying it's a true story while making white look horrible. They're wedges. It's worse than how Robin Williams deleted himself. Like a Midas touch but things crack instead of turning gold.
TULSA RACE RIOT.
come on De Niro is always the same character, repeating his lines like we didn't hear him the first time, his wife left him cause of his constant hate of Trump, now he's giving his vaxxed sperm away, I pray for the baby.
He’s very old it’s over this movie ok at best
This movie is so much better than OK, from the accounts told by those that have seen it.
@@rachelallen5534 cmon now seriously???
@@Christopher-xe2ts Absolutely. It's a long time coming for this story to be told, and it appears to be done well. Do you know anyone who has seen it personally? Have you listened to very many reviews? Him being old doesn't factor in for me--obviously it's a descrepency compared to the real age of the person he's playing, but that's not a dealbreaker for me. The story overall is what is important.
@@rachelallen5534 totally agree
So Leonardo DiCaprio an Indian?
Not at all. He married in to become a 'guardian' and inherit the riches.
@@rachelallen5534 haha dirty dawg
This is actually black history people
No it’s not! Stop blackwashing my peoples history. You people got your own history to lie about.
they gave rave reviews for The Irishman and it was a ludicrous overrated overly long bore fest
The B.B.C. review is idiotic.