I like to view the ending in a happier light. the man selling those paintings doesn't know their value, hence why he's selling them for five dollars, and the couple are buying it for it's beauty, they're appreciating it not for the price but for the work itself. The man isn't selling it to make ridiculous profit, he isn't fueled by greed and I think the final painting we see that he hangs up kind of reflects the good ending of the movie, the sun has risen and the children are seen enjoying nature in the way that the art itself should be enjoyed
Dude, you totally stole my comment...I guess that's what I get for being 4 months late, but seriously, you put my thought on the last scene into words far better than I could. So thank you.
I don't think spirit of Dease will attack any of the people who purchased the art. He seemed to only go after people who were greedily profiting from his artwork. The guy on the street got money for it, but he didn't really care for it or believe it had real value, so he's in the clear too
What if the same standards were applied to murder? Is a "peaceful" (not to be confused with merciful) murder somehow less of a murder than someone being murdered execution style by a couple of bullets in the head?
I don't think so the man is still profiting from the artwork. And he's selling them on a street corner because he does know the true value of them. But if he did I'm sure he would be asking much steeper prices for the art
Veronika Alcoba I laughed so hard at the end when she found the third body. She just screamed “third one” or something similar like she was so done with everyone
Dude it's because she is related to the artist who died in the very beginning setting off the entire plot. Might even suspect her toiling in some kind of nether magic...
@@1bluehammock i think it's because she kept dease's cat, The cat knows when something is going on, that's why Coco is always there when an artistic death happened
@milk 고양이 the paintings didn't kill him hoboman was insulted by his critic on him earlier in the movie hoboman though that only way to save him was to kill me.
milk 고양이 milk 고양이 You’re pretty much right. Dease’s paintings somehow allowed his spirit to control and haunt various forms of artwork, not just his paintings, since all of the characters were killed by artwork made from different artists. Dease gave explicit instructions to destroy his paintings, so he is exacting revenge on anyone who tried to exploit his artwork for their personal benefit. The Hoboman didn’t kill Morf because it got a bad review. Dease’s spirit took control of the robotic sculpture as a way to get to Morf, who had previously bought some of his art and wanted to write a book about him. Someone suggested that Morf storing the paintings rather than destroying them meant he was planning to sell them or use them in the future, which would give Dease reason to kill him, but I feel as though Morf had learned his lesson. Maybe I’m biased because I like Jake Gyllenhaal.
I found it cool that Josephine’s end came when she was covered in paint. Near the beginning of the film, Morf tells Josephine that her skin is the most beautiful thing he’s ever seen. So it’s some ironic spin that her demise consisted of her skin becoming tainted and drowned in paint.
I think her punishment may be the worst. Since she was the one that started the whole thing (Presuming the kitty was innocent, which it is) and we don't know completely if she is dead in the wall. For all we know she could still be alive, forever watching the world from inside it.
“Humble”, the one thing none of these characters are... is the site of the first death, and some of their potential profits literally going up in flames. They have their symbolism down pat.
Pychritcx it's still a spoiler bc obviously most ppl haven't finish the video yet and is just scrolling through the comments while the video plays💁🏾♀️😂
I feel like Jake's death was the only one that shouldn't of happened. Like, he was the only one that tried to right the wrongs and tried to do what was right. Like damn.
No intention to offend you, but as you seem to be a non-native english speaker, I'd like to help and let you know that it's 'shouldn't have' , as in *should not have* Shouldn't OF makes no sense at all.
@@ncapbigfella5800 ....what the hell...?! I only meant to help another person and I edited mine because I forgot a word...what's wrong with you? Supressed sexual energy...? Lol?! 🤔
@@riastradh If that's the case then it's all good! Thanks for being respectful unlike others as I only meant to help. What is wrong with people getting so angry at nothing, imagine them carrying guns too. Insane
“Once I built a railroad” , It’s a direct reference to the old song about our workers during the great depression being completely thrown away by society after working to build all the buildings roads and grill ways not to mention fighting in the first world war just in an instant being cast away by society
I saw someone write this somewhere else but important to note is that every character dies while trying to move, hide or destroy the art. Morf keeping some pieces for himself in storage, Bryson stealing the paintings, Jon and Gretchen when making big sales, Josephina trying to remove the picture off her phone, Rhadora when getting rid of the paintings. Even Dease himself dies while trying to destroy his art. The idea, beside just the blatant "art for the sake of art, not money" theme - is that art will kill to be seen.
also the character deaths were caused by pieces they did not appreciate or they became that bryson was killed by the paintings he took cos he thought they were probably the less valuable ones that people would not notice being missing gretchen got killed by the sphere that she just threw in as a tag-along to the dease works she wants exhibited morf got killed by the robot installation he shitted on josephina shitted on graffiti as not being good enough art when speaking with damrish so she died becoming graffiti rhadora removed all art in her house but not her tattoos (likely cos she did not even think it was art) so it was the tattoos that killed her also interesting how people considered the death of gretchen to be art (and josephina actually becoming art when she died) - it reflects the grotesque world of the art market and how it profits on the suffering of people e.g. dead artists like van gogh (or in this film, damrish) who never actually received much support for their works during their life
The part where he says “sobriety hasn’t been good for him” and the woman says “this was when he was in the full swing of alcoholism” and he says “exactly”. Was like a back and forth of him saying that the art piece is good BUT he’s not making good art anymore. Not that it was him making a mistake. It was a conversation stating that he sucks now but he used to be really good.
I think it could also be that he was about to criticize the piece just based off of gossip about the artist current reputation, which would show how much the asking price of pieces of art was manufactured b.s.
I completely agree with this. As someone who has a small background in exhibition culture from multiple different mediums, when I first heard that line I knew instantly that he was referring to the fact his art is no longer as good. The art world can be such a snooty place, guess it is why I loved this movie.
I find it really interesting the only two main characters who didn’t die were the only ones who truly cared for art. Damrish let go of Haze’s massive deal in the end - and therefore a hell of a lot of profit and global recognition - and turned to the smaller company he was with before. Additionally Piers was already a well renowned artist, his name was already big. He COULD have been pumping out plenty of paintings for profit and people would’ve bought it solely for the name. But he didn’t, because he genuinely cared for his art and what it meant for him. He wasn’t inspired so his art wasn’t of good enough quality in his eye. Neither of them were hugely financially motivated. This is also why I think the couple who bought the painting in the end are safe. When they saw it, the girl said “that’s lovely” she knew nothing of the name Dease or it’s worth; she bought it solely because she appreciated the beauty of the art
No, that's not it. Damrish didn't die because he had nothing to do with with any of Dease's work. Same with Piers. Everyone who died had either profited or was planning to profit off of Dease. So the couple at the end are safe, but not because they appreciate art, but because they bought it. The guy who sold it, whoever.
Sm0k3turt13 exactly, I don’t think the whole spirit thing is to be taken literally and the ending is supposed to be like the superficial side of the art is done and it’s back to normality
I thought the part where he says "exactly" in reference to the painting wasn't a mistake, but rather him stating that the artwork he was looking at was decent, because it was painted when the artist was an alcoholic, and maybe all his new works were crap because he's not drunk anymore.
Yeah was just about to point this out lol. Also, now that he is no longer an alcoholic, his art is rubbish. Kinda disappointed this was misstated in the video.
I don't think those people who bought the paintings from the street is going to get killed by the curse. The seller is simply selling it not out of greed or bad intentions but selling it as it is, a painting that need not be millions in value to have worth. Its price tag isn't making the painting more worthy or not. It is simply art for art's sake, not profit. That is how "art" should be and this is in contrast to those "critics" that a painting is only as good as its price tag.
That's right. They bought the painting because they liked it, no because it was fashionable, or were expecting it profit from it in future. They just simply like the painting, without any financial motifs.
I'm not sure about that. Even a price of $5 is still profit because the vendor on the street did not create the art himself, nor is he lovingly admiring it in some "safe space." He's on the street making money for the sake of making money. I don't know how the tortured ghost painter would feel about that.
@@mizscoleman yeah but the people who bought them i don't think will get punished, since they bought out of admiration not ourof greed, i think they'll be safe
i think the interpretation of the ending wasnt good. I think the ghost will not return to haunt those who bought or sold the art for 5$, because the whole movie was a critique towards the art industry that tries to basically dictate whats art and what not and wants to make as much money as possible. I see many hints towards Banksy in this movie, who did similar stunts that fit this theme. For example did he literally sell his art for those 5$ to random people walking by even though they are worth now hundreds of thousands dollar. He even tried to destroy his own painting during an auction. What we see in this movie and what sadly is reality is that art has become a perversion of what it used to be. Its no longer about the meaning or interpretation but only about how much money auctioneers can make. I tihnk the end of the movie was supposed to show a contrast to what we have seen already and it is representing irony and even mocking the industry to some degree. The art that has been previously sold for multiple millions is now being sold for couple of bucks by people who dont really understand or try to understand art. They want to make a living and let actual people decide what the art is worth to them or not. Thats what art should be. Another parallel to Banksy is the street artist Damrish - also a graffiti artist - who always leaves the scene in hurry aftere starring at the art for minutes and thinking about it. He was guided back to his roots by the art and didnt care about the money he could potentially make. At the very end of the movie we see Piers drawing circles and lines in the sand while the water washes away parts of it. I think this is a very clear message from the director to the viewer: Art is transient. It fades away.
Just an opinion to your first statement : It starts off as 5 dollars but the hobo will soon see that people are very much drawn to these works and the amount will surely increase. even though it's just a homeless man selling art for 5 bucks,he still just wants it for profit instead of giving it away for others to enjoy- I mean its STOLEN art for goodness sake he didnt go to the cops and return it to see who it belongs to he knew "this is something I can sell" and thats all he saw about it no passion no sincerity about it nada. He has no artistic background in comparison to the others working in the industry so to him he tests the waters starting at 5 - hes got a thousand pieces to sell so 5 will easily turn into 5k but Im sure he'd increase it the more people are enchanted and "hypnotized" by the allure of DEASE paintings. But there's so much wishy washy "rules" for this spirit dead guy or w/e ...like if youre a bad person you die I guess?? but I feel the reason Coco didnt die is because she literally said "If I dont make money Ill move back to Michigan" meaning at this point she hasn't made a PROFIT from the DEASE paintings and therefore she lives...for now. [But when she was talking with dondon she showed that she was willing to do shady shit against her last employer to work with him showing that the rat race art world was getting to her and her fate wouldnt probably be too far off from the others in time - not necessarily death but a change in her as a person for the worst]. Same with Damish , he decided to go away and return to his roots as you said with art and not fly high with the "big wigs" so he was saved . And etc with Piers like the critic said so ,that being said - I agree with how the critic is interpreting the ending. But art isnt something that fades away. In fact it is more permanent than our own lives. far after we are dead our works will live after us unless destroyed by someone or nature gets a hold of it. People are still marveling at michelangelo, davinchi, degas , rembrandt, warhol, dahli, everett,mucha,klimt,caravaggio, etcetcetc looong after they have left us - the important part of Piers's ending is that he LETS it fade away - he is simply creating for creating's sake and is unattached to the end result - just purely having fun. the only thing that fades away in todays art world is who is "in" and who is "out" the popularity of the next best thing. But the classics and how we study them and honor them will not fade and that is how it should be with art in general but because of money and such it becomes about that.
@@donventura2116 like i said,unless a human destroys it or it gets destroyed naturally yes. But the pieces and artists themselves dont really as we have photos,books,classes,and people that are hand chosen to restore the works to their former glory[which is a huge honour and life dedicating job]. It doesnt matter that these works have been touched up or that they are replicated images its the fact they still exist and many people still talk about them. When I say art doesnt fade I dont mean it as literally as it could be - there are going to be artists many people never knew or will know and only they will know their art until they die,yes ,and then we have street art that can be painted over or buildings demolished etc, I understand that nothing is all that permanent I just disagreed with the way the original poster was using "art fades" - it just seemed to be missing a point when put together with their theory. I think as long as there is one person to hold onto a memory of art and shares it whether the original, in a photo , or a duplicate it exists - I guess my meaning went more off into a sentimental semi permanence type way of thinking ,something you hold onto. But that comes from an artists point of view as well :]
The message is brilliant; an artist always pours their heart and soul into a piece, and the critics and community kill it. In this movie, the piece kills them.
Rhodora didnt stop because she was almost crushed, she was informed about Morfs death after Coco found him and she tried to call Josephine but she didn’t answer cause she was dead, remembering what morf told her
Hm, in german it‘s called „Die Kunst des toten Mannes“ which translates to „The Art of the dead man“ If I didn‘t recognise the thumbnail, I would have totally missed this one.
Did anyone else notice that the gas station the maintenance guy stopped at was called "Humble?" A bit ironic LOL thought that was clever that they threw that in there
Honestly the only 3 things I liked about this film: 1. Jakey 2. John Malkovich 3. The way Morf being bisexual(?) isn't made a big deal in his character development
Actually u made a mistake.. Rodora got rid of all art pieces in her home as she realizes that having art around is that which will lead to her death. The only piece of art she couldn’t get rid of or forgot about was her tattoo which eventually kills her ❤️
I think it's also a bit because she never really changed. I mean she got rid of the art yeah, but only to save her butt. She still only sees art as a means to make money. I feel like the fact that she keeps her tattoo, and didn't see it as art, proves that she didn't change.
That's what i thought too. Art is everywhere like the graffiti on the wall that kills Josephine. Tattoos is art and getting rid of the painting s was useless
I was desperate for something good to watch on youtube today and I'm excited to see your vid FoundFlix. You and Dead Meat are my favs. Keep up the good work!!
The art world is as weird, elitist and monied as portrayed. Another important point about the absurdity of the current state of art - Toni Collette’s character doesn’t just work at a museum, she’s a curator at LACMA, one of the most prominent modern art museums in the States, yet is relegated to a minor role in art acquisition (like at Art Basel Miami) because the best pieces are bought by wealthy collectors (usually in frenetic private auctions or negotiation) never to be seen in public again (as her character gripes about in the movie). This real-world buying frenzy is almost unheard of elsewhere and if she can’t compete, what hope do the rest of us have. It’s unfair that such brilliance and talent in any field should be sequestered away from the public and reserved for the wealthy. Also, it’s interesting that the art has a markedly different effect on the artists namely Piers and Damish in the film...they’re more unsettled than the others, seemingly understanding the darker forces earlier than the others.
I never thought of that but it's a really cool interpretation! Do you think that she died because she still participated in the highbrow world despite her dislike of it? Because to me her death doesn't really fit, she seemed to actually enjoy the art and had a desire to share it unlike the others who just used it for money.
I didn’t take the “recreation” of Dease’s painting to be a way fit Dease’s spirit to kill. I just thought Dease used Art in general. Like using the sphere sculpture(Gretchen was really drawn to it in the first place), Hobo Man (Morf gave it a bad review and ignored the message of the piece), the graffiti street art (Josephina’s boyfriend was a street artist & missed the point of his art), and finally Rhodora’s tattoo(the punk band she was in and left for this lifestyle). Body art is still Art. Also If I remember correctly Rhodora got rid of ALL the art she had in her home not just the Dease painting.
As a kid, I followed a cat at Disney land, tripped over a wire, fell on a large metal box and ended up in hospital because I almost broke my cheek bone so I learnt to never follow cats the hard way but at least I wasn’t murdered🤷🏻♀️
i was really excited for it but i felt like it was a bit of a let down:/ i guess i wanted more of a horror movie and was disappointed at what it turned out to be
Personally I think a horror movie where people are haunted by some of Shadbase’s artworks would’ve been 10 times more horrifying than some creepy oil paintings...
Josephina used the cat as an excuse to look at and then to steal Dease's paintings. She gives the cat to Coco, the ultimate finder of dead bodies. Dease's art was giving the other art the power to kill the profiteers as Dease's art itself never killed anyone. It didn't target the buyers or viewers of said art leaving all of them alone. It seemed to also inspire the true artists (Bryson was a poser) to make art for themselves and not the profiteers of the art world. Overall loved the movie. It's in my binge worthy top ten. Like the German title for the movie as well. Die Kunst des Toten Mennes. The art of the dead man. Or so google translate tells me.
Google is right, and I honestly wish it was the american title. Velvet Buzzsaw is only a minor plot point. I think they used it for marketing purposes, which is pretty ironic if you think about it.
@@jeremyphillips3087 I guess I have to watch it again and see if it still holds up. I like the Gyllenhaal’s though so I might be a little biased, but we’ll see.
I've never seen the movie so I can't say for sure, but the way it's described here, I can see a morbidly beautiful irony in Josephina's death. She claimed there is no point in art if people and the public can't see it. Then when she is killed, she is assimilated into a piece of graffiti art. Which is an art that's ignored, or not seen by the public. So in death, the artist teaches her the true value of art.
I'm not 100 percent sure about this, but I think there actually is/was an artist who used his blood to paint something!this was a cool movie concept. Also, I love your kitty
The real question is did he foresee these events happening or did he set them in motion. Because he painted the last seen of the lady and the cat before it happened.
I didn't watch the trailer, so didn't know what to expect. If it was indeed advertised as a horror I get why people got disappointed. For me though interesting plot and just moments of horror really worked and I found the movie great.
I absolutely disagree with his reading on Morf. He is explicitly motivated by his passion for art! To say he's motivated by greed is a major oversight when he specifically tells Gretchen he reviews art bc he loves it.
I agree. I think he is lumped in with the rest just because he is killed. I think he would have been fine if he didn’t try and keep some of the art at the end. Him wanting to keep it showed he did have some kind of greed for the art. Even if it wasn’t money.
I think you might have missed a scene. He literally gave a bad review to Josephina's ex at her request, causing the guy to end up in a car crash. You can also see at the funeral how his art critiquing, essentially deciding what is and isn't art, destroys people's entire careers. This is why all those voices were parroting his negative reviews back to him in that sound proof room. He isn't actually genuinely critiquing anything, he's just deciding who's art will get sold for millions and who's will get put into storage, only to further his career and profit while pretending he's above it all.
@@iluvsyouallz yea and on top of that he still tried to save some of the cursed art for his own personal reasons. He has this grand and noble perception if himself, and while he is perhaps morally superior to many of the other greedy characters, he is still just as ego driven, even if he cant admit that.
Agreed (get it? a-Greed?) Even if he did do it out of passion for art, his willful disregard of it's effects on people's lives and his ability to affect the art world itself is what got him killed. He may have realized the paintings were dangerous, but even then he never realized why they were, and only acted to save himself and his reputation.
Me: "So I have been having some pretty disturbing hallucinations recently. Should I go see a therapist?" Friend: "Na, you need to go see the eye doctor!"
That... Would have yielded a nicer development... Even if he had gone after he went to the optometrist. However, I feel that (I guess) we are supposed to take this as further evidence of Morf's lack of introspection/not seriously questioning his sanity. Like, even though he is obviously seeing wired shit and he knows something is not right, it's less of an assult to his ego and mental faculties if his experiences can be boiled down to an eye problem... Rather than a MIND problem.
I felt like the movie just got in a hurry to wrap up the story after the first three deaths. Maybe I just got so attached to Morf, especially after he seemed to have an epiphany, that I wanted to see him overcome the evil.
Jake Gyllenhaal was, like always, amazing in his role, but my god was this movie a major disappointment. I was so mad. The trailer made it seem like a fancy horror movie twist but the deaths were so dull. The pacing was so inconsistent and story had potential but there was nothing about WHY the paintings were so supernatural and caught everyone’s eye. It’s not even a satire. It’s just awful.
Personally I think it was a reference to the common belief that someone's soul/intent never really dies when they do if they have put themselves into it, quite literally in Dease's case by using his blood. The Conjuring movies being an example I guess of the usual mainstream version, where a soul latched onto something (the house) or demon using the Annabelle doll. If angered or just naturally a bad soul from them being a tortured/shitty human, if it doesn't get what it wants, it lashes out. I think they didn't go into it because other than Jake Gyllenhaal's character when he was realizing how fucked everything was and pretty much before Rhodna or whatever her name was was realizing she will die if she stayed around art, it wouldn't be in character or the timing wouldn't be right for them to look into it anyways and for them to finish the movie so dramatically. I honestly did not watch the trailer completely, only until they explain that the paintings were discovered in a dead guys apartment, so I found some of the deaths fitting but not completely unexpected. I barely even realized they were switching cities or how much time had passed with the pacing though, but whatever. I sort of enjoyed it and the message I probably pulled out of my ass for it however lol
You are shallow as fuck. Maybe it sounds pretentious but, I dont think this movie was for you. As an artist I found it absolutely genius. The movie was a black comedy satire, not a horror movie. It perfectly portrays the art world elite.
I think Dan Gilroy must have been stuck on a flight to Europe and watched the contemporary art documentary "The Price of Everything" on the plane like I did. The mirrored sphere could be a take on Jeff Koons' "Gazing Ball" series featured in the doc, just as Russo's character could be based on Amy Cappellazzo, who also made her name in the non-art town of Miami and sold her soul. I wonder if the mystery artist was inspired by Larry Poons? PS @13:20 Did Jake Gyllenhaal just turn into Nicolas Cage?
The child like art is a form of "land art", the main point of this kind of art is that to withdraw from the consumerist way of the contemporary art market. Loved the ending ... what not to love, to see nutty Malkovich drawing on sand? Gorgeous! :)
After Birdbox,I felt used by Netflix.But Toni Collette,Russo & Jake & John brought it in this wickedly bizarre send up of overrated Modern Art.Kudos to actress who played Josephina.Well done.
“Pretty sure that’s not normal, just use a fucking crayon or something” fucking killed me 😂😂😂 I feel like you about busted out laughing with the idea of that 💀😂
Just love your commentary. Every one so fun. You are THE best movie commentator online. I liked this movie. It wasn’t was I was expecting, but it was a good ride none the less.
@@luigibros.5527 I believe this movie accomplished its purpose of satirizing the world of high art and did it excellently. I can't see how is this movie cheap
River Martinez they would take a shot from the the same perspective of the reflective surface then they would put the image on the surface through computer editing creating a realistic reflection effect on the orb
I like to view the ending in a happier light. the man selling those paintings doesn't know their value, hence why he's selling them for five dollars, and the couple are buying it for it's beauty, they're appreciating it not for the price but for the work itself. The man isn't selling it to make ridiculous profit, he isn't fueled by greed and I think the final painting we see that he hangs up kind of reflects the good ending of the movie, the sun has risen and the children are seen enjoying nature in the way that the art itself should be enjoyed
This interpretation is so beautiful. I am in love
THIS. 😭❤
Dude, you totally stole my comment...I guess that's what I get for being 4 months late, but seriously, you put my thought on the last scene into words far better than I could. So thank you.
Or the couple's children get burned to death under the sun while having a picnic
But he is still selling it and making a profit out of paintings that were meant to be destroyed under the artist’s death wish.
When someone says "Destroy these {Insert Object}" you probably should do so.
Now you have to muhahahahahaha
Miki Kun damnit well gg kids
America BUUUUUUUUUUUUT
But what if it is Indestructable? Hm?
unless it is a nuke
I don't think spirit of Dease will attack any of the people who purchased the art. He seemed to only go after people who were greedily profiting from his artwork. The guy on the street got money for it, but he didn't really care for it or believe it had real value, so he's in the clear too
Profit is profit.
What if the same standards were applied to murder? Is a "peaceful" (not to be confused with merciful) murder somehow less of a murder than someone being murdered execution style by a couple of bullets in the head?
@@mizscoleman I'm pretty sure the attacks are based on mindset and the characters that die are terrible people at heart.
Dease Nutz
I don't think so the man is still profiting from the artwork. And he's selling them on a street corner because he does know the true value of them. But if he did I'm sure he would be asking much steeper prices for the art
What an oddly specific serial killer.
Hey it’s the guy who created the animation that made me sad at the end because I knew that it was over
huh this is the first time i see the top comment with 2 replies
@@boogrs55 This is the first time I see the top comment with 3 replies
@Errol Draeger
Did you create your channel for the sole purpose of spamming others this scam?
Serial killers are a strange bunch...
I just found it so funny Coco witnessed almost all the deaths :L She was so fed up by the end 😂
Veronika Alcoba I laughed so hard at the end when she found the third body. She just screamed “third one” or something similar like she was so done with everyone
@@abbyr8749 😀 i think what she said was, 'Fuck me!'
That was hilarious!
Veronika Alcoba 14:39
Dude it's because she is related to the artist who died in the very beginning setting off the entire plot. Might even suspect her toiling in some kind of nether magic...
@@1bluehammock i think it's because she kept dease's cat, The cat knows when something is going on, that's why Coco is always there when an artistic death happened
I wish Morf had been allowed to live. He seems like he genuinely wanted to make things right.
@milk 고양이 the paintings didn't kill him hoboman was insulted by his critic on him earlier in the movie hoboman though that only way to save him was to kill me.
milk 고양이 milk 고양이
You’re pretty much right. Dease’s paintings somehow allowed his spirit to control and haunt various forms of artwork, not just his paintings, since all of the characters were killed by artwork made from different artists.
Dease gave explicit instructions to destroy his paintings, so he is exacting revenge on anyone who tried to exploit his artwork for their personal benefit.
The Hoboman didn’t kill Morf because it got a bad review. Dease’s spirit took control of the robotic sculpture as a way to get to Morf, who had previously bought some of his art and wanted to write a book about him.
Someone suggested that Morf storing the paintings rather than destroying them meant he was planning to sell them or use them in the future, which would give Dease reason to kill him, but I feel as though Morf had learned his lesson. Maybe I’m biased because I like Jake Gyllenhaal.
It’s sad when he tried to get rid of the pieces but still got killed .
Same thought. I felt bad he died.
No, he just wanted to save his ass. Once this was over, he would go right back to his pompous ways.
I found it cool that Josephine’s end came when she was covered in paint. Near the beginning of the film, Morf tells Josephine that her skin is the most beautiful thing he’s ever seen. So it’s some ironic spin that her demise consisted of her skin becoming tainted and drowned in paint.
she also said, "whats the point of art if nobody sees it"? Lol bitch you're disguised in a wall forever
And she wanted to become part of art but not in the way she died
Oh my. That is fantastic.
I think her punishment may be the worst. Since she was the one that started the whole thing (Presuming the kitty was innocent, which it is) and we don't know completely if she is dead in the wall. For all we know she could still be alive, forever watching the world from inside it.
And that's what you call Art👌
I actually really liked this movie and might I say jake is one hell of a actor when put in certain roles with a good script
When you say "certain roles with a good script" i hope you mean any role ever because Darko is the best actor of all time
Level100Studios Question is the movie about read oral what’s the story behind it or what’s the message behind the movie
Was this a dig at that time he played in Prince of Persia? I feel this is a dig at that Disney adaptation of a video game. :D
You need to watch more movies...
One movie gentleman....JARHEAD!
"Who made these paintings?"
"Dease"
"Dease who?"
"Dease Nuts! HA! GOT EM!"
Eternal Dog my thoughts exactly 😂
I knew I'd find this comment before I even finished watching the video.
This made my day.
Damm
@@1lillbluepikmin Yura who?
We not talking about how the gas station was called Humble
Sit down, lil' b*tch, be humble
Omlet Man Frick, I never noticed that before. Good catch man!
Whats it from?
Very clever
“Humble”, the one thing none of these characters are... is the site of the first death, and some of their potential profits literally going up in flames. They have their symbolism down pat.
I remember back when I was part of the first 140k subscribers for this channel. I would love to congratulate him on coming so far with his content.
Same
Same man
Yup same here. Amazing how fast this channel has grown.
Your perched to the quire
Bro I’m seeing you everywhere omg
The only death I was sad abt was Jake's character. He had good intentions & didn't know that it was stolen.
Spoiler alert
Loralyn F. Shut up, why else would u watch this video? If u didn’t watch it and clicked this ur just dumb
Pychritcx it's still a spoiler bc obviously most ppl haven't finish the video yet and is just scrolling through the comments while the video plays💁🏾♀️😂
@@Hi_Tamera lol ya I don't really care
I really wanted to stop watching it after he died but I pushed through the last 10 minutes
I feel like Jake's death was the only one that shouldn't of happened.
Like, he was the only one that tried to right the wrongs and tried to do what was right. Like damn.
same here... he was doing as he was told so he could keep his job.
No intention to offend you, but as you seem to be a non-native english speaker, I'd like to help and let you know that it's 'shouldn't have' , as in *should not have*
Shouldn't OF makes no sense at all.
Jacqueline Ess that doesn’t make him sound like a non English speaker, that just seems like a typo
@@ncapbigfella5800 ....what the hell...?!
I only meant to help another person and I edited mine because I forgot a word...what's wrong with you? Supressed sexual energy...? Lol?! 🤔
@@riastradh If that's the case then it's all good! Thanks for being respectful unlike others as I only meant to help. What is wrong with people getting so angry at nothing, imagine them carrying guns too. Insane
“Once I built a railroad” , It’s a direct reference to the old song about our workers during the great depression being completely thrown away by society after working to build all the buildings roads and grill ways not to mention fighting in the first world war just in an instant being cast away by society
Didn't expect to find you here.
commiesarentpeople dayofrope you must have not taken your high school history class yet lol
commiesarentpeople dayofrope Hard to detect “sarcasm” on internet, especially with the amount of people who would actually ask that question
Yeah, humans do that.
@@riastradh Not twice as much work, but is twice as depressing.
I saw someone write this somewhere else but important to note is that every character dies while trying to move, hide or destroy the art. Morf keeping some pieces for himself in storage, Bryson stealing the paintings, Jon and Gretchen when making big sales, Josephina trying to remove the picture off her phone, Rhadora when getting rid of the paintings. Even Dease himself dies while trying to destroy his art. The idea, beside just the blatant "art for the sake of art, not money" theme - is that art will kill to be seen.
Jay HM wow thank you. I always just thought he just died of old age, but now that seems so silly. The art killed him!
And the black guy was never killed cause he loves looking at it, yes that explains why.
morf was actually trying to get rid of them by locking them away. but it was too late
also the character deaths were caused by pieces they did not appreciate or they became that
bryson was killed by the paintings he took cos he thought they were probably the less valuable ones that people would not notice being missing
gretchen got killed by the sphere that she just threw in as a tag-along to the dease works she wants exhibited
morf got killed by the robot installation he shitted on
josephina shitted on graffiti as not being good enough art when speaking with damrish so she died becoming graffiti
rhadora removed all art in her house but not her tattoos (likely cos she did not even think it was art) so it was the tattoos that killed her
also interesting how people considered the death of gretchen to be art (and josephina actually becoming art when she died) - it reflects the grotesque world of the art market and how it profits on the suffering of people e.g. dead artists like van gogh (or in this film, damrish) who never actually received much support for their works during their life
@@Pranckall Rhadora was killed by art of her previous life as punk rock star she threw away.
Jake Gyllenhaal looks like he could play the main character in the game "We Happy Few".
Arthur Hastings
Jake Gyllenhaal as Arthur Hastings. Yup I could live with that cuz they do look alike.
Forgot that game existed
@@solitary2 Not missing much. What a flop
The part where he says “sobriety hasn’t been good for him” and the woman says “this was when he was in the full swing of alcoholism” and he says “exactly”. Was like a back and forth of him saying that the art piece is good BUT he’s not making good art anymore. Not that it was him making a mistake. It was a conversation stating that he sucks now but he used to be really good.
I agree.
I think it could also be that he was about to criticize the piece just based off of gossip about the artist current reputation, which would show how much the asking price of pieces of art was manufactured b.s.
Exactly
It’s funny how in birdbox he’s a drunk
I completely agree with this. As someone who has a small background in exhibition culture from multiple different mediums, when I first heard that line I knew instantly that he was referring to the fact his art is no longer as good. The art world can be such a snooty place, guess it is why I loved this movie.
I find it really interesting the only two main characters who didn’t die were the only ones who truly cared for art. Damrish let go of Haze’s massive deal in the end - and therefore a hell of a lot of profit and global recognition - and turned to the smaller company he was with before. Additionally Piers was already a well renowned artist, his name was already big. He COULD have been pumping out plenty of paintings for profit and people would’ve bought it solely for the name. But he didn’t, because he genuinely cared for his art and what it meant for him. He wasn’t inspired so his art wasn’t of good enough quality in his eye. Neither of them were hugely financially motivated.
This is also why I think the couple who bought the painting in the end are safe. When they saw it, the girl said “that’s lovely” she knew nothing of the name Dease or it’s worth; she bought it solely because she appreciated the beauty of the art
No, that's not it. Damrish didn't die because he had nothing to do with with any of Dease's work. Same with Piers. Everyone who died had either profited or was planning to profit off of Dease. So the couple at the end are safe, but not because they appreciate art, but because they bought it. The guy who sold it, whoever.
No, this is not correct. The two of them had no involvement with the cursed art.
I think the ending is not bad. The fact that his art is being enjoyed not by price but just for what it is is a good ending to me.
Sm0k3turt13 exactly, I don’t think the whole spirit thing is to be taken literally and the ending is supposed to be like the superficial side of the art is done and it’s back to normality
I thought the part where he says "exactly" in reference to the painting wasn't a mistake, but rather him stating that the artwork he was looking at was decent, because it was painted when the artist was an alcoholic, and maybe all his new works were crap because he's not drunk anymore.
Yeah was just about to point this out lol. Also, now that he is no longer an alcoholic, his art is rubbish. Kinda disappointed this was misstated in the video.
I don't think those people who bought the paintings from the street is going to get killed by the curse. The seller is simply selling it not out of greed or bad intentions but selling it as it is, a painting that need not be millions in value to have worth. Its price tag isn't making the painting more worthy or not. It is simply art for art's sake, not profit. That is how "art" should be and this is in contrast to those "critics" that a painting is only as good as its price tag.
That's right. They bought the painting because they liked it, no because it was fashionable, or were expecting it profit from it in future. They just simply like the painting, without any financial motifs.
I'm not sure about that. Even a price of $5 is still profit because the vendor on the street did not create the art himself, nor is he lovingly admiring it in some "safe space." He's on the street making money for the sake of making money. I don't know how the tortured ghost painter would feel about that.
@@mizscoleman yes! and remember that deise request was for them all to be destroyed. Not sold for a million, or even $5.
@@mizscoleman yeah but the people who bought them i don't think will get punished, since they bought out of admiration not ourof greed, i think they'll be safe
thank you for putting me at ease because I felt so bad cus for SURE the couple that bought it were BONED.
Did anyone else find this film anticlimactic? I feel Jake Gyllenhaal did a FANTASTIC job, but I was left "wanting" for more story/content.
ik, the ending was just....*sighs*
Rachel M agreed
I agree, which leads me to wonder why this film needed to be explained, it was rather straight forward and simple...an explanation was unnecessary.
This movie is not "anticlimatic" it's just straight shit. Nothing about this movie is good, nothing at all
This was the first and only time when I was straight-up angry about wasted time on a movie
i think the interpretation of the ending wasnt good. I think the ghost will not return to haunt those who bought or sold the art for 5$, because the whole movie was a critique towards the art industry that tries to basically dictate whats art and what not and wants to make as much money as possible. I see many hints towards Banksy in this movie, who did similar stunts that fit this theme. For example did he literally sell his art for those 5$ to random people walking by even though they are worth now hundreds of thousands dollar. He even tried to destroy his own painting during an auction. What we see in this movie and what sadly is reality is that art has become a perversion of what it used to be. Its no longer about the meaning or interpretation but only about how much money auctioneers can make.
I tihnk the end of the movie was supposed to show a contrast to what we have seen already and it is representing irony and even mocking the industry to some degree. The art that has been previously sold for multiple millions is now being sold for couple of bucks by people who dont really understand or try to understand art. They want to make a living and let actual people decide what the art is worth to them or not. Thats what art should be.
Another parallel to Banksy is the street artist Damrish - also a graffiti artist - who always leaves the scene in hurry aftere starring at the art for minutes and thinking about it. He was guided back to his roots by the art and didnt care about the money he could potentially make.
At the very end of the movie we see Piers drawing circles and lines in the sand while the water washes away parts of it. I think this is a very clear message from the director to the viewer: Art is transient. It fades away.
I agree
𝙏𝙝𝙚 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣 𝙞𝙨 𝙬𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙜, 𝙗𝙚𝙘𝙖𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧𝙚 𝙞𝙨 𝙣𝙤 𝙞𝙣𝙩𝙚𝙧𝙥𝙧𝙚𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣. 𝙎𝙤 𝙢𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙤𝙛 𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙨𝙚 "𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙚𝙙" 𝙫𝙞𝙙𝙚𝙤𝙨 𝙙𝙤𝙣'𝙩 𝙙𝙤 𝙖𝙣𝙮 𝙚𝙭𝙥𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙣𝙞𝙣𝙜 𝙖𝙩 𝙖𝙡𝙡, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙞𝙩'𝙨 𝙟𝙪𝙨𝙩 𝙖 𝙬𝙖𝙮 𝙛𝙤𝙧 𝙝𝙞𝙢 𝙩𝙤 𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙘𝙡𝙞𝙥𝙨 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙢𝙤𝙫𝙞𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙨𝙪𝙢𝙢𝙖𝙧𝙞𝙯𝙚 𝙞𝙩.
Just an opinion to your first statement : It starts off as 5 dollars but the hobo will soon see that people are very much drawn to these works and the amount will surely increase. even though it's just a homeless man selling art for 5 bucks,he still just wants it for profit instead of giving it away for others to enjoy- I mean its STOLEN art for goodness sake he didnt go to the cops and return it to see who it belongs to he knew "this is something I can sell" and thats all he saw about it no passion no sincerity about it nada. He has no artistic background in comparison to the others working in the industry so to him he tests the waters starting at 5 - hes got a thousand pieces to sell so 5 will easily turn into 5k but Im sure he'd increase it the more people are enchanted and "hypnotized" by the allure of DEASE paintings. But there's so much wishy washy "rules" for this spirit dead guy or w/e ...like if youre a bad person you die I guess?? but I feel the reason Coco didnt die is because she literally said "If I dont make money Ill move back to Michigan" meaning at this point she hasn't made a PROFIT from the DEASE paintings and therefore she lives...for now. [But when she was talking with dondon she showed that she was willing to do shady shit against her last employer to work with him showing that the rat race art world was getting to her and her fate wouldnt probably be too far off from the others in time - not necessarily death but a change in her as a person for the worst]. Same with Damish , he decided to go away and return to his roots as you said with art and not fly high with the "big wigs" so he was saved . And etc with Piers like the critic said so ,that being said - I agree with how the critic is interpreting the ending. But art isnt something that fades away. In fact it is more permanent than our own lives. far after we are dead our works will live after us unless destroyed by someone or nature gets a hold of it. People are still marveling at michelangelo, davinchi, degas , rembrandt, warhol, dahli, everett,mucha,klimt,caravaggio, etcetcetc looong after they have left us - the important part of Piers's ending is that he LETS it fade away - he is simply creating for creating's sake and is unattached to the end result - just purely having fun. the only thing that fades away in todays art world is who is "in" and who is "out" the popularity of the next best thing. But the classics and how we study them and honor them will not fade and that is how it should be with art in general but because of money and such it becomes about that.
bomber9912 referring to banksy, no they were worth millions when did that. He disguised them as cheap knock offs
@@donventura2116 like i said,unless a human destroys it or it gets destroyed naturally yes. But the pieces and artists themselves dont really as we have photos,books,classes,and people that are hand chosen to restore the works to their former glory[which is a huge honour and life dedicating job]. It doesnt matter that these works have been touched up or that they are replicated images its the fact they still exist and many people still talk about them. When I say art doesnt fade I dont mean it as literally as it could be - there are going to be artists many people never knew or will know and only they will know their art until they die,yes ,and then we have street art that can be painted over or buildings demolished etc, I understand that nothing is all that permanent I just disagreed with the way the original poster was using "art fades" - it just seemed to be missing a point when put together with their theory. I think as long as there is one person to hold onto a memory of art and shares it whether the original, in a photo , or a duplicate it exists - I guess my meaning went more off into a sentimental semi permanence type way of thinking ,something you hold onto. But that comes from an artists point of view as well :]
so 97% of the video is a direct summary of the movie and 3% analysis of the movie. That's exactly what I was looking for.
Yes, they are movie reviews...but you have to have a gimmick to fall under fair use law to show live clips....or something to that effect
The message is brilliant; an artist always pours their heart and soul into a piece, and the critics and community kill it. In this movie, the piece kills them.
In Soviet Russia, art kills you!
Rhodora didnt stop because she was almost crushed, she was informed about Morfs death after Coco found him and she tried to call Josephine but she didn’t answer cause she was dead, remembering what morf told her
Hm, in german it‘s called „Die Kunst des toten Mannes“ which translates to „The Art of the dead man“
If I didn‘t recognise the thumbnail, I would have totally missed this one.
So does it make sense of violet buzzsaw?
@@animelvr99 *velvet buzzsaw
Makes more sense thank naming the movie based off a tattoo from a band that had no impact on the movie other than just the one kill..
Hehe kun(s)t
@@G3T_Racket not really true. Rhodora sold Velvet Buzzsaw out. Now look what the payoff is.
Did anyone else notice that the gas station the maintenance guy stopped at was called "Humble?" A bit ironic LOL thought that was clever that they threw that in there
Honestly the only 3 things I liked about this film:
1. Jakey
2. John Malkovich
3. The way Morf being bisexual(?) isn't made a big deal in his character development
Yes I agree! It was done well, with respect and tact, not shoved in our faces to the point his entire identity became it.
4. Coco
Nobody else like this comment
Mountain devil70 Why? You prefer identity to be shoved down our throats when the narrative doesn’t require it? It’s unnecessary and annoying.
God I really hate the phrase “shoved in our faces”.
The whole credit scene I was on the edge of my seat afraid that John Malkovich was going to be swallowed up by the sand.
Actually u made a mistake.. Rodora got rid of all art pieces in her home as she realizes that having art around is that which will lead to her death. The only piece of art she couldn’t get rid of or forgot about was her tattoo which eventually kills her ❤️
siigisa
Not so much that she forgot about it, but she doesn't consider it art even though it is. She still judged it and she was punished for it.
I think it's also a bit because she never really changed. I mean she got rid of the art yeah, but only to save her butt. She still only sees art as a means to make money. I feel like the fact that she keeps her tattoo, and didn't see it as art, proves that she didn't change.
That's what i thought too. Art is everywhere like the graffiti on the wall that kills Josephine. Tattoos is art and getting rid of the painting s was useless
i love how sweetly this was put.
This was a pleasant surprise from Netflix. It’s not often I want to rewatch a movie. Let alone a Netflix movie.
I have no desire to see this film again BUT I agree it is far better than most of the Netflix movies I've had the misfortune to watch.
I was desperate for something good to watch on youtube today and I'm excited to see your vid FoundFlix. You and Dead Meat are my favs. Keep up the good work!!
@Quality Comment, thanks to you and Kpopfangirl24 , I'm going to give Dead Meat channel a try.
when i have to fart i stop the video and change the tab so i don't disrespect him
@@ericgarcia4777 yessss do that. Such a good channel
Same. Saranghae cute girl
Kpopfangirl24 never thought i would meet another fellow meatie
Redora's death really drives home the quote "life imitates art"
*then Morf turns into Mysterio and destroys the Hobo Man.*
Is he the same actor who played mysterio in far from home? Because I don’t get the joke
lucaschannel7 2 yes. yes he is.
skorpion ok then
Jesus i thought the title said " The Velveeta buzzsaw" and i immediately thought of a cheese wheel of death
You have no idea how much I need that to be a movie now
I laughed too hard 😂 I need that now
“Sweet dreams are made of cheese,
Who am I to diss a brie?”
So silly 🙄😆
🤗
I didn’t enjoy the movie that much but jakes acting in this movie was great
faded fella - he was bisexual actually. he dated Ed before Josephina.
@faded fella true! He was in no way manly
Who said it was a straight role, and does it matter? And you either didnt pay attention at all or didnt even watch the movie
he is bi... he never stating he is gay whatsoever....
The art world is as weird, elitist and monied as portrayed. Another important point about the absurdity of the current state of art - Toni Collette’s character doesn’t just work at a museum, she’s a curator at LACMA, one of the most prominent modern art museums in the States, yet is relegated to a minor role in art acquisition (like at Art Basel Miami) because the best pieces are bought by wealthy collectors (usually in frenetic private auctions or negotiation) never to be seen in public again (as her character gripes about in the movie). This real-world buying frenzy is almost unheard of elsewhere and if she can’t compete, what hope do the rest of us have. It’s unfair that such brilliance and talent in any field should be sequestered away from the public and reserved for the wealthy.
Also, it’s interesting that the art has a markedly different effect on the artists namely Piers and Damish in the film...they’re more unsettled than the others, seemingly understanding the darker forces earlier than the others.
I never thought of that but it's a really cool interpretation! Do you think that she died because she still participated in the highbrow world despite her dislike of it? Because to me her death doesn't really fit, she seemed to actually enjoy the art and had a desire to share it unlike the others who just used it for money.
Jake's acting was superb and really the best thing about this movie. He just fits into the role so well.
John's eyes are super freaky while he's hanging there like that O_O. That's a nightmare face right there!
Jake Gyllenhal seems to be the poster boy for weird movies
Can you imagine him in a John Water's movie in the 70's. He'll be unnerving as he'll.
@@lipstickzombie4981 Hard to doublecheck what you write?
Donnie Darko was and still is fricken amazing.
He’s good! Loved him in this role.
Donnie Darko, Nocturnal Animas, Enemy, Nightcrawler, yeah... non conventional movies.
'Vetril Dease' is an anagram for 'Evil art seed'
Alex Johnston that’s pretty good to know
You are onw smart man
I love how Shaggy always manages to use .02% of his power to make these ending explained videos
*0.000000002%
AGREED
I didn’t take the “recreation” of Dease’s painting to be a way fit Dease’s spirit to kill. I just thought Dease used Art in general. Like using the sphere sculpture(Gretchen was really drawn to it in the first place), Hobo Man (Morf gave it a bad review and ignored the message of the piece), the graffiti street art (Josephina’s boyfriend was a street artist & missed the point of his art), and finally Rhodora’s tattoo(the punk band she was in and left for this lifestyle). Body art is still Art. Also If I remember correctly Rhodora got rid of ALL the art she had in her home not just the Dease painting.
As a kid, I followed a cat at Disney land, tripped over a wire, fell on a large metal box and ended up in hospital because I almost broke my cheek bone so I learnt to never follow cats the hard way but at least I wasn’t murdered🤷🏻♀️
As a cat owner I can confirmed that you should never follow a cat.
well... the cat fellows me
Ram Kitten true, evil incarnate
420 likes
19:27 I think his cat eats all his food lol
Coco has plenty to do, she finds all the bodies, lol!
ive been loving jakes roles hes really breathes air into these rather crazy roles he takes
this is literally one of the best concepts for a movie i've seen
i was really excited for it but i felt like it was a bit of a let down:/ i guess i wanted more of a horror movie and was disappointed at what it turned out to be
Finally. I watched the movie before the episode came out
Same😄
(in toddler gamora voice) What did it cost?
@@lightdarkequivalent7143 an hour or so of my life
Should i watch movie or just this video
Actually i prefer it the other way around
Every time I hear "dees" I still say "nuts" in my head
Lorenzo Gibbs some scares are deeper than others
Well, Dease was nuts. XDDD LOLOLOL So that works.
Yeeeeees
Ah hell me too. I caught myself unintentionally saying it. Crazy that I came from the generation that put that word play into the modern lexicon lol
same
Personally I think a horror movie where people are haunted by some of Shadbase’s artworks would’ve been 10 times more horrifying than some creepy oil paintings...
Hit or Miss
That, my friend, is the next level of artistic culture.
Good to see I'm not alone.
That's a very specific artist
No pls
Nooooo hatgirl
DUDE, “along with John malcovitch...” DAVEED DIGGS IS RIGHT THERE. LAFAYETTE!!!! 1:12 love ya
“Sniff out the painting”
Asbestos: Allow us to introduce ourselves
Wait, was that Daveed Diggs? Whattup Lafayette! Good to see him getting featured in more and more stuff with A-listers. He deserves it.
Josephina used the cat as an excuse to look at and then to steal Dease's paintings. She gives the cat to Coco, the ultimate finder of dead bodies.
Dease's art was giving the other art the power to kill the profiteers as Dease's art itself never killed anyone. It didn't target the buyers or viewers of said art leaving all of them alone. It seemed to also inspire the true artists (Bryson was a poser) to make art for themselves and not the profiteers of the art world.
Overall loved the movie. It's in my binge worthy top ten.
Like the German title for the movie as well. Die Kunst des Toten Mennes. The art of the dead man. Or so google translate tells me.
Google is right, and I honestly wish it was the american title. Velvet Buzzsaw is only a minor plot point. I think they used it for marketing purposes, which is pretty ironic if you think about it.
Thank u
I liked the whole vibe of the movie, felt very artistic. Everyone’s outfits and homes were my favorite thing from the movie.
Agree! Even the galleries for some reason, love the whole aesthetic of the movie
I thought it was one of the worst movies I've ever seen. Had a vibe like a bad episode of goosebumps. Just juvenile and cliche.
@@jeremyphillips3087 I guess I have to watch it again and see if it still holds up. I like the Gyllenhaal’s though so I might be a little biased, but we’ll see.
How could you not mention Daveed Diggs?!
At least someone mentioned him. 🎶 That’s one less thing to worry about 🎶
I spotted him!
He didn't mention Zawe Ashton either. 🤔😒
I've never seen the movie so I can't say for sure, but the way it's described here, I can see a morbidly beautiful irony in Josephina's death. She claimed there is no point in art if people and the public can't see it. Then when she is killed, she is assimilated into a piece of graffiti art. Which is an art that's ignored, or not seen by the public. So in death, the artist teaches her the true value of art.
Review nightcrawler. I know it's a bit out of your genre but i'd like a well made review.
The art was so cool in this. Watercolor intro and pretty cool idea. Jake killed it and it was really runny satire, the end was pretty dumb though.
I'm not 100 percent sure about this, but I think there actually is/was an artist who used his blood to paint something!this was a cool movie concept. Also, I love your kitty
You're right, his name is Vincent Castiglia. There's also Mark Quinn who sculpted in his own blood.
There have been tons of people that have done this. Not really a fact, more like common knowledge
There is a painting called The Anguished Man that the artist mixed his blood into the paint, completed the painting and then committed suicide.
@@oddeyes9413wonder full....
bet he *hung* to the art then...
[don't kill me o_o]
@@GooseWithAPassport Actually one artist did the graphic of the guitarist of slayer with his blood
I don’t watch the movies. I watch ending explained 😂
Me too. Especially if its a horror movies.
@@phantomknight4758 Agreed! I don't have the stomach for movies like this but I still want to know what happens
Loved the painting in the film. They reminded me of "The Hands Resist Him".
Love that cat
Thicc kat
I love your ginger cat... He's like, "FFS, here we go again."
and for the musical theatre fans there is DAVEED DIGGS FROM HAMILTON!!!
Hildy YAAAAAAAAAAAAS
me chasing down the stray cats in my neighborhood: "i may die but it will be worth it to pet the kitty!"
I love how I can watch a random movie and I just know you have the ending explained for me.
The real question is did he foresee these events happening or did he set them in motion. Because he painted the last seen of the lady and the cat before it happened.
It always comes back to the cats
I didn't watch the trailer, so didn't know what to expect. If it was indeed advertised as a horror I get why people got disappointed. For me though interesting plot and just moments of horror really worked and I found the movie great.
I absolutely disagree with his reading on Morf. He is explicitly motivated by his passion for art! To say he's motivated by greed is a major oversight when he specifically tells Gretchen he reviews art bc he loves it.
I agree. I think he is lumped in with the rest just because he is killed. I think he would have been fine if he didn’t try and keep some of the art at the end. Him wanting to keep it showed he did have some kind of greed for the art. Even if it wasn’t money.
I think you might have missed a scene. He literally gave a bad review to Josephina's ex at her request, causing the guy to end up in a car crash. You can also see at the funeral how his art critiquing, essentially deciding what is and isn't art, destroys people's entire careers. This is why all those voices were parroting his negative reviews back to him in that sound proof room. He isn't actually genuinely critiquing anything, he's just deciding who's art will get sold for millions and who's will get put into storage, only to further his career and profit while pretending he's above it all.
@@iluvsyouallz yea and on top of that he still tried to save some of the cursed art for his own personal reasons. He has this grand and noble perception if himself, and while he is perhaps morally superior to many of the other greedy characters, he is still just as ego driven, even if he cant admit that.
Agreed (get it? a-Greed?) Even if he did do it out of passion for art, his willful disregard of it's effects on people's lives and his ability to affect the art world itself is what got him killed. He may have realized the paintings were dangerous, but even then he never realized why they were, and only acted to save himself and his reputation.
I'm not following any of this "dont go after cats" bullshit. A cat's a cat man, I will pet it.
@@taylorwiser3114 Gladly
I liked the fact that this movie didn't try to explain itself too much. It's like art in a gallery. It merely is.
The people were much more scary, than the paintings/curse...much, much scarier.
I know what you mean. Most of those people were flat out insufferable. I was rooting for the paintings/curse to take them out.
Personally I think that’s possibly one of the main points of the movie, and why the horror almost came second if that makes sense
Me: "So I have been having some pretty disturbing hallucinations recently. Should I go see a therapist?"
Friend: "Na, you need to go see the eye doctor!"
That... Would have yielded a nicer development... Even if he had gone after he went to the optometrist.
However, I feel that (I guess) we are supposed to take this as further evidence of Morf's lack of introspection/not seriously questioning his sanity.
Like, even though he is obviously seeing wired shit and he knows something is not right, it's less of an assult to his ego and mental faculties if his experiences can be boiled down to an eye problem... Rather than a MIND problem.
i just finished it and the first place i came was here. Keep up the good work i subbed since your Krampus video i think 1-2 years ago.
Ok...who wanted to say “Deez Nutz” everytime he said dude’s name?
Me. To be honest
No i Claim to have Standards
Ben Dover
ok ben dover.
wait..
:3c
Or Rick Deez
I felt like the movie just got in a hurry to wrap up the story after the first three deaths. Maybe I just got so attached to Morf, especially after he seemed to have an epiphany, that I wanted to see him overcome the evil.
Was Dease nuts?
Insa- Goteeem
Yaldabaoth I was waiting for him to say it but nope 🤷🏼♂️
I bet that was the pitch line for this movie.
Hehe. Good one
I got the 69th like
"...with no sign of him...it's assumed he simply stole them and ran off...rather than being murdered by a monkey painting"
spit take right there
"You went too far, Jake Gyllenhaal." I love both how he says that line, and also that the Donnie Darko case is right there as he says it.
The director must be an X-Men fan; Morf and Nightcrawler
ITz THe GrUMpy oLd MaN FrOM BiRd bOx!
Jake Gyllenhaal was, like always, amazing in his role, but my god was this movie a major disappointment. I was so mad. The trailer made it seem like a fancy horror movie twist but the deaths were so dull. The pacing was so inconsistent and story had potential but there was nothing about WHY the paintings were so supernatural and caught everyone’s eye.
It’s not even a satire. It’s just awful.
Custom Evolved I agree. But it was still weirdly entertaining incoherent mess. It was like to different styles of movie thrown together.
It was a fancy horror movie
Personally I think it was a reference to the common belief that someone's soul/intent never really dies when they do if they have put themselves into it, quite literally in Dease's case by using his blood. The Conjuring movies being an example I guess of the usual mainstream version, where a soul latched onto something (the house) or demon using the Annabelle doll. If angered or just naturally a bad soul from them being a tortured/shitty human, if it doesn't get what it wants, it lashes out. I think they didn't go into it because other than Jake Gyllenhaal's character when he was realizing how fucked everything was and pretty much before Rhodna or whatever her name was was realizing she will die if she stayed around art, it wouldn't be in character or the timing wouldn't be right for them to look into it anyways and for them to finish the movie so dramatically.
I honestly did not watch the trailer completely, only until they explain that the paintings were discovered in a dead guys apartment, so I found some of the deaths fitting but not completely unexpected. I barely even realized they were switching cities or how much time had passed with the pacing though, but whatever. I sort of enjoyed it and the message I probably pulled out of my ass for it however lol
Yeah it was kind of bad made, but man was it entertaining to watch, ngl, I liked it.
You are shallow as fuck. Maybe it sounds pretentious but, I dont think this movie was for you. As an artist I found it absolutely genius. The movie was a black comedy satire, not a horror movie. It perfectly portrays the art world elite.
man i hated Josephina SO much and i hated the actress too for some reason she just wasn't good for me she was so stiff and wooden
i dunno she just seems like a bitch to me
I was so dissapointed her death wasn't as brutal as the other deaths
VOIZ CRACK well yea but it is still terrifying being moulded into a painting.
I wanted to make her take a long walk off a short plank and set fire to her.
@@voizcrack pretty terrible thought. No matter how much you hate the character or person doesnt justify this
“You went too far Jake Gyllenhaal” at 16:02 can describe most of Jake Gyllenhaals movies
I think Dan Gilroy must have been stuck on a flight to Europe and watched the contemporary art documentary "The Price of Everything" on the plane like I did. The mirrored sphere could be a take on Jeff Koons' "Gazing Ball" series featured in the doc, just as Russo's character could be based on Amy Cappellazzo, who also made her name in the non-art town of Miami and sold her soul. I wonder if the mystery artist was inspired by Larry Poons?
PS @13:20 Did Jake Gyllenhaal just turn into Nicolas Cage?
The child like art is a form of "land art", the main point of this kind of art is that to withdraw from the consumerist way of the contemporary art market. Loved the ending ... what not to love, to see nutty Malkovich drawing on sand? Gorgeous! :)
It reminds me of that artist group "Are we cool yet?" from scp universe.
Can you please do Castle Rock 10th (last) episode, the ending was so weird, suprising and much confusing.
Did I see daveed diggs mr layfette/Thomas Jefferson
werollwith NOX OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH
This movie was a mix between The Ring, A Nightmare on Elm Street, and American Psycho.
So leave the art and artists alone!they will speak when they want to speak!
After Birdbox,I felt used by Netflix.But Toni Collette,Russo & Jake & John brought it in this wickedly bizarre send up of
overrated Modern Art.Kudos to actress who played Josephina.Well done.
“Pretty sure that’s not normal, just use a fucking crayon or something” fucking killed me 😂😂😂 I feel like you about busted out laughing with the idea of that 💀😂
1:12 *Guns and ships intesifies*
Just love your commentary. Every one so fun. You are THE best movie commentator online. I liked this movie. It wasn’t was I was expecting, but it was a good ride none the less.
This movie felt really cheap. I'm assuming that's why it got a netflix release. Jake was still awesome as always.
How was it cheap? Luxury cars, impressive convention centers, museums, luxury penthouses, mansions
@@LuisSierra42 dude...
@@LuisSierra42 I think you missed the point...
@@luigibros.5527 I believe this movie accomplished its purpose of satirizing the world of high art and did it excellently. I can't see how is this movie cheap
How the fuck it's cheap?I think it went over your head.
1:10 Hey how do they keep the cameras from being seen in these types of shots?
Probably digitally removed them from the shot?
Editing/Photo shop
River Martinez they would take a shot from the the same perspective of the reflective surface then they would put the image on the surface through computer editing creating a realistic reflection effect on the orb
*PHOTOSHOP*
probably green screen or editing