"What makes a plane fly?" asked the instructor...."Lift" said one student...."Thrust" said another "Wrong!"....said the instructor......."money makes a plane fly"
fam van Philips it’s niche is for short and soft field opps , I assume if they upped the weight and fuel tank it would be counter productive to such, but what do I know
@NonyaBusiness! My mistake. I was thinking of Phenom 300E (only 1971 Nm though, but extremely likable nonetheless) and the Citatation C4J (barely 2165Nm, so not really that longer range). But it would be interesting to see with mix biofuel and hybrid engines coming into the market in 10yrs time, that eventually these planes will have a longer range, long enough to reach NY-Paris none stop.
What do you mean predecessor? - 0:30 'Predecessor' is usually something that was before and gave birth to something new. In industry that also means 'previous model'. I don't think Pilatus will give away their share on the market and just leave the sector they have created. Especially now when copycat Cessna Denali is here.
Simply fantastic and an irresistible mid jet aircraft to fly wherever you want to. Thanks so much for this meaningful information on UA-cam and really looking forward for more of these interesting flights on your UA-cam channel. Regards. From The Flight Deck .
My wife and I both like the "12" alot. But for 1 to 1.5 less you can pretty much restore a very low time Marquise to a fantastic level, cruise 300 +, land and t/o on the same type runways, or worse.....oh...and be 100+ kts or so quicker with an engine out.
Unless there is a constraint on wingspan, you are always better off with more span than some kind of tip treatment. Commercial airplanes use tip treatments because of gate span constraints.
Low stall speeds are great, this looks like an amazing aircraft. Especially when you consider the Medevac mission. My question, coming from a Canadian Medevac B350 Captain, what is the perfomance for this aircraft out of short runways 4000 feet or less, when there is a contaminated runway? It is my understanding that this aircraft has no reverse thrust, it concerns me that balanced field length will be a limiting factor with a contaminated runway.
Looks like a capable bird but 11m is also a price. As Pilatus I would look to getting rid of the turboprop PC-12. The front prop roaring 20s image weighs the company and at 5m$ why would anyone buy that over a twin engine jet. I would look at two things. Making their own engines because that is such a critical cost item and they are not that difficult to make. And second, developing a design that's very easy to make, light and with very few failure points. Specifically a single piece woven body with no windows and only one small door and one minimal emergency exit, maybe rear top for water landing. Bare minimum cockpit windows and rely on camera vision. A single piece fiber body can be super light yet have extreme confidence will not rupture. The lighter the plane, the better everything else is. I would reduce the cross section for better drag and use reclined seats in a slight inward fishbone angle and use the full height of the hull, no raised floor at the middle. 4 or 6 seats plus single central pilot seat. Maybe a light weight offset second pilot option 'jump seat'. The plane could maybe be so light that a long chord wing could work without any flaps. Tremendous advantage in avoided complexity. Aim for sub 1 million dollar price tag. Sell 10k of them. Rock the world. Might even do something really aggressive as having very short fixed thin aerodynamic landing gear. Being limited to paved runways is not a huge sacrifice. And in emergency could still land on grass/dirt. Super light also makes ballistic parachute easier. I'm not sure any jets anywhere offer that?
Turbo prop sales are still their bread and butter; for sure your recommendations will result in a better plane, but the cost of R&D and tooling make it a poor financial choice. Communications among avionics and engine are also critical; design a new avionic suite for a new engine is beyond the capability of most manufacturers; if it was that simple, Airbus and Boeing would certainly had the their fist dips. Some major manufactures even outsource certain components of the airframe, mostly wings.
Dan, honey, ask the buyers of Pilatus PC-12 why the hell did they choose front prop roaring 20s image over a twin engine jet. There are some people around the globe who received new PC-12 or pre-payed full price for it in 2019, same year you text your genius ideas. Reading the rest of it made me think only - how many aviation engineering companies did you lead/do you lead? 'Cause it all resembles childish fantasies a lot. However, I may be assumptive here, thus that's what I came up with: why don't you create your own aviation company and built such (an) airplane(s)?
@@aleksandrnestrato that's a common mindless reaction. I just have to fix all the world's problems and realize all opportunities because I'm not allowed to speak about it according to your mindless pettiness. The Embraer 100 costs less and is 50% faster. And has two engines. I don't know why some buy it. Maybe the cargo door. Certainly not for the prestige. And I imagine it's horribly noisy compared to a rear engined jet.
@@DanFrederiksen Same here: ask the buyers. Both ones of Pilatus PC-12 and ones of Embraer 100. I'm not trying to blame you for something. Please, excuse me if I seem offensive to you. My point here is that I perceive your thinking model as primitive one and that's why. You seem to insist that two jet engines are better than one turboprop engine. But it's not so. First. To get permission to 'drive' jet airplane one has to get way more expensive, profound and long training. And type certification for that particular jet as well. In costs money. Or you can hire a pilot and pay him/her salary. Money again. Second. Fuel burn of a jet engine is twice more than of a turboprop. We compare one turboprop versus two jets, that means four times more fuel. Money again. Third. Flying jet means air space A where all commercial airliners fly. You have to pay for that. Also you have to accord your flightplan with certain authorities. You can't fly your own route as if you were flying in the air space G. Money again. Fourth. Jet airplanes have substantially higher speeds. All the speeds. Stall speed, rotation speed, approach speed, landing speed. That means you'll be flying fast not only when you want it, but also in every situation where you'd be glad to go a lot slower (that's why special education for jets is required btw). And if you go fast on takeoff and landing you have to use airstrips both longer and with smoother surface. That means using airports for jets. It costs more money. Money again. And the number of such airports restricts you to certain landing and takeoff locations from which and to which you will have to use some other transportation, be that a car, bus or train. Loss of time can be loss of money. Money again. The jet in example me be twice cheaper, but considering all the operational costs it can result in much higher price overall. There are numerous types of applications where you'll be happy to spent those $5million on a PC-12 and at the same time you won't find a spot for a jet, even if it costs half the price. About you. I don't think you have to fix all the world's problems and realize all opportunities, no. I never meant that. What I propose you is - get your personal experience and then judge. You write "I don't know why some buy it. Maybe the cargo door." That's what I'm talking about - you don't know. You have no information nor experience. That's why you kinda not allowed to speak about it. But it's not me not allowing you, God forbid. That's YOU who doesn't allow yourself speak about anything you don't know. Again: excuse me, Dan. Never meant to wound you. All the best!
@@aleksandrnestrato phenom 100 doesn't burn 4x the fuel of a pc12. That's just not true. Most of what else you say is wrong too. It doesn't cost money to fly at high altitude.
I'm not suppose to watch this. I'm just fuckin hurting my self when I see real planes right before my eyes cause I was less than an inch closer to owning one, when my adoptive mother pull the plug and drain all my chances to become a pilot and got my own aircraft... a Shrike Commander
PC24 a Legend right after its Launch
Just need the winning lottery numbers! Sweet!
"What makes a plane fly?" asked the instructor...."Lift" said one student...."Thrust" said another
"Wrong!"....said the instructor......."money makes a plane fly"
Rodolfo Lasparri right on! LOL
thats only 8.9million usd. very affordable. but one think i dislike this plane is the position of lavatory
AOPA's Super Cub Giveaway program has to run out of inventory at some point. The PC-24 is a great second option. Just putting it out there...
Exactly!!!
This is such a pretty aircraft - I want one!
The cartels are going to love this!
Really happy to see the performance of pc24 amazing
I drive an 18-year-old compact car, how did I end up here!?😂
i do not even have that
Goals man
Tem que fazer conexão aqui em Várzea Grande aeroporto marechal
Dream big 😂
Maybe a plastic model, or a Chinese "Pilatus PC-24 mug", on e-Bay ? Much lower maintenance costs...
Love that “Space Age” glass dash!!!
Probably my best medium range PJ!
Plus it looks great.
They know how to build airplanes, even in this category!
Can't wait for the Pilatus PC-24ER
Thats what I'm wondering if they will come out with an Enhanced version like Honda Jet and Cirrus did with their new jet models
Yeah. Need SFO to HNL range.
Beautiful aircraft !!!
440kts cruise with a 95kt over the fence? Talk about an unusual wing...
more like 420kts.
@@Blazingspitfire really? a weed reference?
@@DanFrederiksen what?
@@DanFrederiksen his name is literally blazingspitfire. it better be a weed reference.
@@DanFrederiksen It's legal, you know
I'm in love with this beauty!
Why do I watch these videos? It's Grant Cardone's fault. Now I need to follow his advice and get rich.
10x that shit and get a jet. 💥
Not a problem Erik. We have a plan for that
Bs from fake rich liars
Perfect! My dream!
When i buy it I’ll charter the hell out of it
The window shades look like blinds, how cool is that?!😀
Great jet, but 2000 mile range is fairly short in this segment. No nonstop intercontinental flights possible. Maybe in the future?
fam van Philips it’s niche is for short and soft field opps , I assume if they upped the weight and fuel tank it would be counter productive to such, but what do I know
That range is typical in this segment. There aren't really any single pilot jets that can reliably reach Hawaii.
@@karlsandin4515 If they Upped the weight they wouldn't be able to get single pilot certification
@NonyaBusiness! My mistake. I was thinking of Phenom 300E (only 1971 Nm though, but extremely likable nonetheless) and the Citatation C4J (barely 2165Nm, so not really that longer range). But it would be interesting to see with mix biofuel and hybrid engines coming into the market in 10yrs time, that eventually these planes will have a longer range, long enough to reach NY-Paris none stop.
@@RobinsM Why is that? What is the link between weight and single pilot certification? (serious question)
Can after sales service available in India
Who is better then Tom...Great work Tom. Tks.
Excellent reliable PC-24 .. 🇦🇺😉🙂👍
Good job Steve )))
So is the Tom Horne doing the flying a former F-16 pilot and GD engineer?
Great looking aircraft.
What do you mean predecessor? - 0:30
'Predecessor' is usually something that was before and gave birth to something new. In industry that also means 'previous model'.
I don't think Pilatus will give away their share on the market and just leave the sector they have created. Especially now when copycat Cessna Denali is here.
The PC12 was before the PC24, Pilatus continues to produce PC12’s and I doubt they have any plans to stop
Aleksandr Nestrato agree. Poor wording.
Simply fantastic and an irresistible mid jet aircraft to fly wherever you want to. Thanks so much for this meaningful information on UA-cam and really looking forward for more of these interesting flights on your UA-cam channel. Regards. From The Flight Deck .
what if that cargo door comes out in air.
This will give the Phenom a run for its money.
Impressive craft.
Can you fly this single pilot?
Fancy: But I think I will stick with my PC-12. Its paid in full!
Agreed!
I’ve ordered my PC 24, I wish it was as cheap to fly as a PC 12, but that’s life, you get what you pay for.
My wife and I both like the "12" alot. But for 1 to 1.5 less you can pretty much restore a very low time Marquise to a fantastic level, cruise 300 +, land and t/o on the same type runways, or worse.....oh...and be 100+ kts or so quicker with an engine out.
@@Smokeyr67 i've ordered 3 PC-24s and a backup PC-12 for good measure. why not? god gave me money so have to use it somehow
Daniel L cool, did they throw in the floor mats and fluffy dice for you?
I just got evicted from my apartment maybe I’ll move into this plane
Awesome jet!!
Does the pc-24 share the same Honeywell primus avionics suite as the pc-12? It looks a little different than the one on pc-12ng.
Why it doesn't have winglets?
A properly designed wing.
That's the plane ! For sure!
Bathroom?
Hargane pinten niki pak
Does it come with a bumper to bumper warranty?
The coolest plane nobody can buy even if you had the money.
No wing tips?
Unless there is a constraint on wingspan, you are always better off with more span than some kind of tip treatment. Commercial airplanes use tip treatments because of gate span constraints.
Love the Navitimer.
Price?
Low stall speeds are great, this looks like an amazing aircraft. Especially when you consider the Medevac mission. My question, coming from a Canadian Medevac B350 Captain, what is the perfomance for this aircraft out of short runways 4000 feet or less, when there is a contaminated runway? It is my understanding that this aircraft has no reverse thrust, it concerns me that balanced field length will be a limiting factor with a contaminated runway.
What do you mean with contaminated? It can land on on gravel!
Daniel D. Runway ice or water on the runway.
Süper , çok güzel hayırlı Ramazanlar
How much miles to the gallon
Is there a number to number waranty
Fun video
Very impressed!
Love it ♥️
The Drug lords aircraft of choice!!!!
Australian Flying Doctors plane of choice!
A flying Swiss watch...
How much im goeing to pay?
How much it's cost
$10.8 million
@@superchargedpetrolhead thanks
@@funfun-bx3rs cheers
Very comfortable but it should've been longer then it would have been the best
And ur point is?
I meant it looks comfortable
NonyaBusiness! AND YOU MUST BE RICH, right? Well stop harassing people on UA-cam will ya?
Thx for saying that
90-95 kts probably empty.
Interesting hinsight
i need to win the mega
It looks like the embraer phenom 300🤔
"NICE !!!"
It basically have has rocket turbine engine
My goal is to win the lottery this year. Once I hit it, I'll place my order.✌️
And what about flying lessons?
Hermoso me voy a comprar uno ✈
Why am I watching this. I fly a Cessna 172 😂😂😂😂😂
Wish they had not raised the price to 12m.
Wow
I thought it was cheaper than that
@Soul Journ You stupid for that .
Ha Ha Ha 😂 you can't buy it
Lol
I sence your frustrated.
HA HA HA HA
They raised it to 10.5 not 12,
Are there better choices for less? Yes!
When it was launched it was sold for $9.8M now they have increased it to $10.5M
I need the cargo door since my wife has a big fifth wheel
Красавчик!!!
No Toilet? The HondaJet has a toilet
Resistan tormentas y huracanes la estructura de aviones
Muy bonito avión hojala alcance 7000kilometros y pueda volar tormentas y de noche
Nooo puede volar vuelos transatlánticos lástima
👍👍👍
⚡⚡⚡❤⚡⚡⚡...wow...
Puedan volar 8000kilometros y tengan alas grafeno y colas grafeno y carcazas grafeno
เอ่อรุ่นนี้1ตัวเอวไปไห้พี่ผดุงมาราช,สงสารพี่ผดุง,,,เป็นผีไปแล้ว,คนขับรถผู้หญิง
Just compare the technical data with Praetor, ou at least try! :)
You're right, the Praetor is well above, if we compare price, operational costs and devaluation...
It is more of a competitor to the phenom 300 due to the price and range. The praetor jets are a class or two above this.
where the toilet at? i gotta have a shitter wherever I go
Techo más alto y más ancho y largo estructura
Son los que quiere el ejército español
wow
Great until a bird strike...
Bird strikes can happen to any plane. And they are pretty rare
Even with both engines taken out, that thing will glide like an Eagle and land on any dirt road or flat field.
❤❤❤😍😍😍😍👌👏👏👏👏
Looks like a capable bird but 11m is also a price.
As Pilatus I would look to getting rid of the turboprop PC-12. The front prop roaring 20s image weighs the company and at 5m$ why would anyone buy that over a twin engine jet.
I would look at two things. Making their own engines because that is such a critical cost item and they are not that difficult to make. And second, developing a design that's very easy to make, light and with very few failure points. Specifically a single piece woven body with no windows and only one small door and one minimal emergency exit, maybe rear top for water landing. Bare minimum cockpit windows and rely on camera vision. A single piece fiber body can be super light yet have extreme confidence will not rupture. The lighter the plane, the better everything else is.
I would reduce the cross section for better drag and use reclined seats in a slight inward fishbone angle and use the full height of the hull, no raised floor at the middle. 4 or 6 seats plus single central pilot seat. Maybe a light weight offset second pilot option 'jump seat'. The plane could maybe be so light that a long chord wing could work without any flaps. Tremendous advantage in avoided complexity. Aim for sub 1 million dollar price tag. Sell 10k of them. Rock the world. Might even do something really aggressive as having very short fixed thin aerodynamic landing gear. Being limited to paved runways is not a huge sacrifice. And in emergency could still land on grass/dirt. Super light also makes ballistic parachute easier. I'm not sure any jets anywhere offer that?
Turbo prop sales are still their bread and butter; for sure your recommendations will result in a better plane, but the cost of R&D and tooling make it a poor financial choice. Communications among avionics and engine are also critical; design a new avionic suite for a new engine is beyond the capability of most manufacturers; if it was that simple, Airbus and Boeing would certainly had the their fist dips. Some major manufactures even outsource certain components of the airframe, mostly wings.
Dan, honey, ask the buyers of Pilatus PC-12 why the hell did they choose front prop roaring 20s image over a twin engine jet. There are some people around the globe who received new PC-12 or pre-payed full price for it in 2019, same year you text your genius ideas.
Reading the rest of it made me think only - how many aviation engineering companies did you lead/do you lead? 'Cause it all resembles childish fantasies a lot.
However, I may be assumptive here, thus that's what I came up with: why don't you create your own aviation company and built such (an) airplane(s)?
@@aleksandrnestrato that's a common mindless reaction. I just have to fix all the world's problems and realize all opportunities because I'm not allowed to speak about it according to your mindless pettiness. The Embraer 100 costs less and is 50% faster. And has two engines. I don't know why some buy it. Maybe the cargo door. Certainly not for the prestige. And I imagine it's horribly noisy compared to a rear engined jet.
@@DanFrederiksen
Same here: ask the buyers. Both ones of Pilatus PC-12 and ones of Embraer 100.
I'm not trying to blame you for something. Please, excuse me if I seem offensive to you. My point here is that I perceive your thinking model as primitive one and that's why.
You seem to insist that two jet engines are better than one turboprop engine. But it's not so.
First. To get permission to 'drive' jet airplane one has to get way more expensive, profound and long training. And type certification for that particular jet as well. In costs money. Or you can hire a pilot and pay him/her salary. Money again.
Second. Fuel burn of a jet engine is twice more than of a turboprop. We compare one turboprop versus two jets, that means four times more fuel. Money again.
Third. Flying jet means air space A where all commercial airliners fly. You have to pay for that. Also you have to accord your flightplan with certain authorities. You can't fly your own route as if you were flying in the air space G. Money again.
Fourth. Jet airplanes have substantially higher speeds. All the speeds. Stall speed, rotation speed, approach speed, landing speed. That means you'll be flying fast not only when you want it, but also in every situation where you'd be glad to go a lot slower (that's why special education for jets is required btw). And if you go fast on takeoff and landing you have to use airstrips both longer and with smoother surface. That means using airports for jets. It costs more money. Money again.
And the number of such airports restricts you to certain landing and takeoff locations from which and to which you will have to use some other transportation, be that a car, bus or train. Loss of time can be loss of money. Money again.
The jet in example me be twice cheaper, but considering all the operational costs it can result in much higher price overall.
There are numerous types of applications where you'll be happy to spent those $5million on a PC-12 and at the same time you won't find a spot for a jet, even if it costs half the price.
About you.
I don't think you have to fix all the world's problems and realize all opportunities, no. I never meant that. What I propose you is - get your personal experience and then judge.
You write "I don't know why some buy it. Maybe the cargo door."
That's what I'm talking about - you don't know. You have no information nor experience. That's why you kinda not allowed to speak about it. But it's not me not allowing you, God forbid. That's YOU who doesn't allow yourself speak about anything you don't know.
Again: excuse me, Dan. Never meant to wound you. All the best!
@@aleksandrnestrato phenom 100 doesn't burn 4x the fuel of a pc12. That's just not true. Most of what else you say is wrong too. It doesn't cost money to fly at high altitude.
Tooooooooppppppp
problematic potty, fix this please
Nuevos tanques grafeno o fibra carbono
$$$$?
Around $10.8 million.
Excelente
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
I am not buy this Airplane but very Good in world
The pilots loud fake laugh and gum falling out of his mouth is a bit distracting but nice plane.
The Lav is in the wrong place... had to be put there because of the large cargo door. IMO a mistake.
H
I'm not suppose to watch this. I'm just fuckin hurting my self when I see real planes right before my eyes cause I was less than an inch closer to owning one, when my adoptive mother pull the plug and drain all my chances to become a pilot and got my own aircraft... a Shrike Commander
They copied the Phenom 300.