In fact, the Prophet Muhammad succeeded in unifying the entire Arabian Peninsula during his lifetime, and all the Arab tribes came to him declaring obedience, but in this video the scope of the Prophet’s rule is depicted in a small area As for the caliphs after the Prophet, the second caliph, Omar, succeeded in conquering Egypt, then stopped and refused to complete the expansion in North Africa. The one who conquered North Africa was the third caliph, Othman, not Omar.
@EmirateOfHind Omar was afraid for the Muslims and was keen on their safety. He refused to invade North Africa because it was a difficult journey and far from Medina. Therefore, reinforcements would be delayed, reactions would be slow, and the arrival of messages would take a long time because there was no fast mail system like the one that existed in the Umayyad state. Omar also refused to invade Sicily because he feared the Muslims would be harmed by the sea, as the Arabs had no naval experience. Omar also refused to invade the lands of the Turks beyond the Oxus River, because of the distance, the same reason he refused to invade North Africa.
@@عبدالعزيزعلى-ش3ز I know they won because of Allah, but I'm saying this for those people who celebrate minor victories against Muslims yet ignore our major victories.
To be fair, the Romans were currently combating the problems of overextension, as well as recovering from the nearly three decade long war with their chief rival. The Sassanids were in the middle of a succession crisis following their defeat in the previously mentioned war. The victory of the Arab armies is no less impressive, but these empires were far past their prime
Dear Muslim Brother in the End you had shown a picture that you suggested shows the Face of the fourth Caliph Imam Ali please do not do that do not show the face of any Caliph Please just write their name like you did in the case of the other Caliphs.
Everyone knows that Abu Bakr, Omar, and Uthman are false and usurped the throne by killing the daughter of the Prophet, while the true successor of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is Imam Ali (peace be upon him).
Because the image that I know (you haven't seen it yet in the video) is an image of an Iranian poet that the Shiites use and they call it the image of Ali bin Abi Talib. The polytheist Shiites.@@kadenthorson5706
2:49 This is not the correct picture of the companion Ali, because Ali does not have a picture like the companion Omar, the companions Othman, and Abu Bakr, and this picture is used by a sect that reveres Ali very much and makes him a god!
ALLAHU AKBAR Ya Allah please give the Jannah Paradise, at all of these beautiful governator. Muhammad sallallahu aleihu uassallam, Abu Bakr as siddik radi Allahu anhu, Umar Ibn al khattab Radi Allahu anhu, Uthman Radi Allahu anhu and Ali Radi Allahu anhu.
Pada masa Nabi Muhammad jazirah Arab udh bersatu. Terus pas Rasul meninggal banyak orang munafik balik lagi kepada kekafiran dan gak mau bayar zakat, karena mereka menganggap zakat itu adalah pajak kepada Rasul, maka dari itu Abu Bakar menasihati mereka terlebih dahulu mau balik kepada ajaran Islam atau berperang.
as i well educated muslim there's a lot of mistakes in this video in rulers with progress on map or the size of the chaliphat or the numbers of armies better watch kings and generals early muslim expansion for better info and understanding
Yanlıl bilgiler var tam olarak hangi tsrihte kim zamanında fethedildiğini yanlış koymuşsun örneğin benim bildiğim kadarıyla mısırdan ötekisi yani tunuz cezayir Hz.Ömer döneminde fethedilmiyor diye biliyorum ama elbette bende yanlış biliyor olabilirim
@@JamilAzhari-s6y While it's true that the Romans and Persians were major powers in their time, the scale of their armies varied greatly depending on the period and specific conflicts. For example, during the early muslim expansion , both had lost the capacity of fielding large armies due to their war lasting almost 20 years (For example Heraclius had to unite the last reminents of an roman army to figth the persians if he had lost it would be over) most modern historians belive the standing army for both romans&persians where about 20 to 30.000. As for the comparison to modern superpowers like the U.S. and Russia, ancient armies were organized very differently, and logistical capabilities were much more limited, thus their ability to mobilize large numbers of troops was constrained by the infrastructure of the time its also important to remember those two countries where figthing an almost 20 year war against each other, now imagine if russia and usa had been figthing for 20 years using all their migth, then another emerging country invaded both, would they be able to figth back against the enemy and defeat them considering they would be figthing for almost 20 years?
@@JamilAzhari-s6y While it's true that the Romans and Persians were major powers in their time, the scale of their armies varied greatly depending on the period and specific conflicts. For example, during the early muslim expansion both had lost the capacity of fielding large armies(example: Heraclius having to unite the last remaining roman armies to figth the persians becase rome had mostly lost their recrutment lands and they where weak) As for the comparison to modern superpowers like the U.S. and Russia, ancient armies were organized very differently, and logistical capabilities were much more limited, meaning their ability to mobilize large numbers of troops was constrained by the infrastructure of the time. its also important to remember that they where fighthing for almost 20 years, imagine if russia and usa where figthing for 20 years and then some emerging power started figthing them, it would be hard for them to defend themselfs from the emerging power
@Althandros but we can say that both empires have better weapons better shildes more horses and even elephants .also the have more food and stragetic location
In fact, the Prophet Muhammad succeeded in unifying the entire Arabian Peninsula during his lifetime, and all the Arab tribes came to him declaring obedience, but in this video the scope of the Prophet’s rule is depicted in a small area
As for the caliphs after the Prophet, the second caliph, Omar, succeeded in conquering Egypt, then stopped and refused to complete the expansion in North Africa. The one who conquered North Africa was the third caliph, Othman, not Omar.
why did umar ra refused to advance in north africa?
@EmirateOfHind
Omar was afraid for the Muslims and was keen on their safety. He refused to invade North Africa because it was a difficult journey and far from Medina. Therefore, reinforcements would be delayed, reactions would be slow, and the arrival of messages would take a long time because there was no fast mail system like the one that existed in the Umayyad state.
Omar also refused to invade Sicily because he feared the Muslims would be harmed by the sea, as the Arabs had no naval experience.
Omar also refused to invade the lands of the Turks beyond the Oxus River, because of the distance, the same reason he refused to invade North Africa.
@@Abu_Nasser_Al-Ghamdiit shows how much he cared for us, may allah make us steadfast in deen just like him 💔
Taking on two superpowers at the same time while being outnumbered, poorer and less advanced and still winning is crazy
This is not crazy, it is support from God.
@@عبدالعزيزعلى-ش3ز
I know they won because of Allah, but I'm saying this for those people who celebrate minor victories against Muslims yet ignore our major victories.
@User-X-f6k . They see everything and know everything, but their hearts are blind.
@@عبدالعزيزعلى-ش3زand its their own pure faith in god
To be fair, the Romans were currently combating the problems of overextension, as well as recovering from the nearly three decade long war with their chief rival. The Sassanids were in the middle of a succession crisis following their defeat in the previously mentioned war. The victory of the Arab armies is no less impressive, but these empires were far past their prime
Allah is the best of planners
Are you Kyrgyz ?
Probably but some middle asian Turks are believing to Gök Tengri@@amazich
@@amazichI think so based on this pfp
Dear Muslim Brother
in the End you had shown a picture that you suggested shows the Face of the fourth Caliph Imam Ali
please do not do that
do not show the face of any Caliph
Please just write their name like you did in the case of the other Caliphs.
Everyone knows that Abu Bakr, Omar, and Uthman are false and usurped the throne by killing the daughter of the Prophet, while the true successor of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is Imam Ali (peace be upon him).
Why
@@kadenthorson5706 In Islam, it is prohibited to draw or present images or faces of a living being.
He might be Shia
Because the image that I know (you haven't seen it yet in the video) is an image of an Iranian poet that the Shiites use and they call it the image of Ali bin Abi Talib. The polytheist Shiites.@@kadenthorson5706
اللهم صلي وسلم وبارك على نبينا محمد وعلى آله وصحبه أجمعين ❤❤❤
2:49 This is not the correct picture of the companion Ali, because Ali does not have a picture like the companion Omar, the companions Othman, and Abu Bakr, and this picture is used by a sect that reveres Ali very much and makes him a god!
No, we worshipp allah and pray for allah not imam ali
@ انت شيعي؟
@Falfer21 yes I am
@@Falfer21 ايه النا شيعيه
@@Thell1178 طيب ليه تقدسون علي
اللهم اعز الدين بأحد العمرين وقد تم عز الدين بك ياعمر الفاروق ❤
ALLAHU AKBAR Ya Allah please give the Jannah Paradise, at all of these beautiful governator. Muhammad sallallahu aleihu uassallam, Abu Bakr as siddik radi Allahu anhu, Umar Ibn al khattab Radi Allahu anhu, Uthman Radi Allahu anhu and Ali Radi Allahu anhu.
Thank you for the video
Pada masa Nabi Muhammad jazirah Arab udh bersatu.
Terus pas Rasul meninggal banyak orang munafik balik lagi kepada kekafiran dan gak mau bayar zakat, karena mereka menganggap zakat itu adalah pajak kepada Rasul, maka dari itu Abu Bakar menasihati mereka terlebih dahulu mau balik kepada ajaran Islam atau berperang.
Beautiful work. Can you make one for the Abbasid and Umayyad Caliphates and complete the Ottoman series?
Jazakallahu kahyran but please do not show the faces of any caliphs or companions ra just show their names.
Glory be to Allah☪️
Thank you, beautiful channel.
Parts of kuwait and iraq were conquered in rule of Abu bakar ra
اللهم صل على سيدنا محمد
this one's a classic
You missed the Persian holdout along the southern Caspian. It lasted until the Abbasids
كنا امة ذات ثقل
ان شاء الله سنعود
روزی ما برای انتقام به سرزمین شما تروریست ها میایم
Great history🇸🇦🕋⚔️
How you make video
as i well educated muslim there's a lot of mistakes in this video in rulers with progress on map or the size of the chaliphat or the numbers of armies better watch kings and generals early muslim expansion for better info and understanding
Yanlıl bilgiler var tam olarak hangi tsrihte kim zamanında fethedildiğini yanlış koymuşsun örneğin benim bildiğim kadarıyla mısırdan ötekisi yani tunuz cezayir Hz.Ömer döneminde fethedilmiyor diye biliyorum ama elbette bende yanlış biliyor olabilirim
There is mistakes in the video in the islamic conquest of maghreb part
اشهد ان علیا ولی الله
خالق الهايا صلوات الله عالهايا بالنسبه للهايا 😂
عنده الولايه التكوينيه ومادافع عن عرضه ولم ينصر الرسول ( ص ) في غزوة احد
@@xmfr7578ولي الله ≠ هو الله
ثقف نفسك قليلا
2:30
Those army sizes are not true
The romans and the persians were out of number
They were like 200000 romans against 30000 muslim
You really think that two countries that where figthing for almost 20 years against eachother would be able to field an army of almost 200.000?
@Althandros yeah because they were the two most powerful countries in that time
They are like usa and russia nowadays
@@JamilAzhari-s6y While it's true that the Romans and Persians were major powers in their time, the scale of their armies varied greatly depending on the period and specific conflicts. For example, during the early muslim expansion , both had lost the capacity of fielding large armies due to their war lasting almost 20 years (For example Heraclius had to unite the last reminents of an roman army to figth the persians if he had lost it would be over) most modern historians belive the standing army for both romans&persians where about 20 to 30.000. As for the comparison to modern superpowers like the U.S. and Russia, ancient armies were organized very differently, and logistical capabilities were much more limited, thus their ability to mobilize large numbers of troops was constrained by the infrastructure of the time its also important to remember those two countries where figthing an almost 20 year war against each other, now imagine if russia and usa had been figthing for 20 years using all their migth, then another emerging country invaded both, would they be able to figth back against the enemy and defeat them considering they would be figthing for almost 20 years?
@@JamilAzhari-s6y While it's true that the Romans and Persians were major powers in their time, the scale of their armies varied greatly depending on the period and specific conflicts. For example, during the early muslim expansion both had lost the capacity of fielding large armies(example: Heraclius having to unite the last remaining roman armies to figth the persians becase rome had mostly lost their recrutment lands and they where weak) As for the comparison to modern superpowers like the U.S. and Russia, ancient armies were organized very differently, and logistical capabilities were much more limited, meaning their ability to mobilize large numbers of troops was constrained by the infrastructure of the time. its also important to remember that they where fighthing for almost 20 years, imagine if russia and usa where figthing for 20 years and then some emerging power started figthing them, it would be hard for them to defend themselfs from the emerging power
@Althandros but we can say that both empires have better weapons better shildes more horses and even elephants .also the have more food and stragetic location
1:21 arab screamer
مااسم الموسيقى
من وين جبتو كل هالأعداد للمسلمين؟ وبرضو فتح مصر كان فقط ب ٤الف جندي مو ١٢الف
حسسني كان عايش ذيك الأيام هو عطيه على جوه
☪️❤💪
The numbers for byzantine and persian empire is wrong. Their numbers were waaay higher
☪️💪🙏🗿❤️🔥❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
نبرد قادیسیه😢
Remove the pictures this is blasphemy!!!!
رضي الله عن ابو بكر وعمر وعثمان وجمعنا واياهم في جنات النعيم وصل اللهم على نبينا محمد وعلى اله وصحبه اجمعين ومن تبعهم باحسان الى يوم الدين
ماذا عن علي؟
2:48 false information here, ail wasn't in Egypt
They didn't take northern Iran. Never did. They got humiliated over and over.
They did break the persian empire and take all lands and spread islam into it
@nCVcr1 They got utterly destroyed trying to invade Daylaman and Tabaristan
🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦🇸🇦
Mauviya is not caliph but 1st sultan
why using the EU4 music for north american natives☠️
اخوي لا تجوز الموسيقى
Why arabs hate persians? 🤔
Persians hate arabs too
Wrong timing your video.633 year Khalid bin waleed parsain iraq Muslims rule and iran rule hazrat usman during period khalifat
happy turkey day Nooby
Mu'awiya is the one who lived by deception
Omaga
ابو بكر الصديق قاهر الكفار وعمر الفاروق فاتح بلاد فارس رضي الله عنهم