@@rhodesianridgeback1599 he is the Beast. The statue the fake Christians will worship will be of him. Musk will build the system they all need for the mark which allows to buy and sell
“Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father also. Let what you heard from the beginning abide in you. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, then you too will abide in the Son and in the Father. And this is the promise that he made to us-eternal life.” 1 John 2:22-25 ESV I think we would do well to let the Bible define our terms…
Revelation 13:18. "Let he who has understanding calculate the number of the beast for it is the name of a man and his number equals 666." Philadelphia is the Birthplace of America and is the same name of one of the 7 churches of revelation. From the center of Philadelphia to the center of Canton Ohio is exactly 333 miles as the crow flies. Canton is where Marilyn Manson was born the Antichrist. From the center of Canton Ohio to the center of Chicago Illinois is exactly 333 miles as the crow flies. Chicago is where Anton Lavey was born. Anton wrote and published the satanic bible in 1969 the same year Manson was born. So from Philly to Canton to Chicago equals exactly 666 miles. No one had thought to break 666 in half and form it into a simple equation, 333+333 = 666. Marilyn Manson and Anton Lavey became friends after meeting at "the Black House" Anton's house in San Francisco. Mansons best selling album is Antichrist Superstar. Manson has also stated that he wants to be the one remembered for ending Christianity.
@jgeph2.4 Revelation means everything but the end time were not supposed to come until the time was right, when the Antichrist is actually on Earth. It's all 1 big plan. I don't think revelation 13:18 was supposed to be figured out until the time was right and that time is now.
@jgeph2.4 I don't believe revelation 13:18 was supposed to be decoded until the Antichrist was on Earth, well he's on earth and I solved revelation 13:18 after over 20 years of research.
Radical, America-centered, speculative interpretation. Nero was the beast, elsewise the first century readers of the Apocalypse could not have understood the text that John (guided by the Holy Spirit) wrote to THEM.
The only place the word 'antichrist' is used in the Bible is First and Second John. According to John, the antichrist was alive in his day, in the first century. To extrapolate and find 'antichrist' in Revelation (also written by John) stretches biblical hermeneutics past the point of rational discourse and makes a mockery of eschatology.
What a ridiculous response. As if all the biblical theologians who understood this phenomenon throughout history and Paul’s and John’s use of the OT apocalyptic to describe this, is irrelevant. They got these ideas from the OT. Analogy of Scripture is a doctrine that would profit in learning before making ignorant comments like this.
@AboundingGraceRadio Firstly, thank you for your gracious Christian response. Secondly, the only school of theology that equated the antichrist with some future 'dictator' is Dispensationalism which was unheard of for nearly 1,900 years of eschatological theology until 'revealed' to Darby through a young girl's ecstatic vision. My interpretation is not 'ridiculous' as you assert; it was mainstream Christian theology for nearly 2 millennia.
@@kevinteichroeb6997 The AC & AC spirit were indeed alive in the 1st century. Paul told the Thessalonians about "him" directly, saying that the "one" who restrained his rise to power would do so until taken out of the way. Why couldn't Paul use plain designations in his epistle? We know the answer. Fast forward to later Christians like Clement and Lactantius (2nd/3rd cent), who both expected a future-to-them antichrist figure. Tertullian in his "Apology," XXXII from the 2nd century, specifically prayed for "Rome's duration," knowing that IT was the restraining force that prevented the rise of the Papacy or that seat of authority and perdition that would set itself up in God's church as God on earth. He understood Paul's words. Hence, the reason Paul could not be specific in his epistles, as he would have invited persecution from Rome had he spoken of Rome's future demise. 476 AD is when the last western Roman emperor was deposed, leading to the rise of the Papacy within 100 years. The AC, as these gentleman discussed, is not a single man, but a succession of men throughout time. However, the 2 Thes. 2 son of perdition is a specific succession of these men that are still here today. Yes, the Papacy is still here, along with his SOJ General & his Jesuit army, whom Historicists believe is the earth beast of Rev. 13:11 with horns like a lamb. The Vatican still very much reigns over the kings of the earth today, which is why all world leaders, including US presidents, must pay homage to the man in Rome. Go search the net for any US president + Pope, and you will see with your own eyes. They all must sit at the Pope's big brown desk across from him like he's the mafia don of the world. It's because he is. That's the unsettling part of this video; that the church today does not recognize who the man of sin STILL IS like our predecessors did and paid with their lives. If we don't know who the "beast" is, and only four beast kingdoms were prophesied in Daniel 2, 7, & 8, then how will the church be prepared for what's coming? Right now most of them believe the false futurist, pre-trib rapture narrative. Sadly, that will lead them all back to Rome and they have no idea because they believe Jesuit, counter-reformation lies.
The comment followed a nonsensical one. Biblical theology works together with systematic. We’re not dispensational, thoroughly Reformed. It was an accepted category of explaining the biblical phenomenon of Antichrist. Spend some time in sound Reformed theology along with even many church fathers and you won’t make these kinds of statements. Geerhardus Vos would be a good start to see the consensus of BT with the analogia fidei on the matter. May God give you much grace in this matter.
@@AboundingGraceRadio That was a slightly kinder response. I have read the church fathers at extreme length. What surprises me is the fact that you declare your position as 'Reformed' which dogmatically declared the Pope as antichrist. Calvin himself was almost certainly post-millennial in his eschatology which demands a partial preterist view of Revelation (and Daniel).
@ check the characteristics of the Little Horn in Daniel 7 and Daniel 9 and you can see they all match with the history of the Roman Catholic Church. In fact up until few years ago all the reformers throughout history since the 1400s believed those passages were referring to the Papal system. But now with the ecumenical movement and the infiltration of freemasonry into Protestantism that side of history isn’t taught
@@batminton7467 there is one the Bible calls it also ‘the son of perdition’ which is a title given to Judas Iscariot. Judas pretended to be a follower of Jesus but betrayed him, so the Antichrist is a system that pretends to be Christian yet has changed the commandments of Jesus and sets himself up as God on earth. Check out the Pope sitting on a white throne between angels surrounded by 4 men and see what Isaiah and Revelation say about the throne of God…
2 John 1:7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist.
This was a very sound biblical discussion about an important, but controversial topic. I enjoyed it. Thank you.
MBS, Elon Musk, Jared Kushner....
even DJT
Its mbs for sure
@@rhodesianridgeback1599 he is the Beast. The statue the fake Christians will worship will be of him. Musk will build the system they all need for the mark which allows to buy and sell
“Who is the liar but he who denies that Jesus is the Christ? This is the antichrist, he who denies the Father and the Son. No one who denies the Son has the Father. Whoever confesses the Son has the Father also. Let what you heard from the beginning abide in you. If what you heard from the beginning abides in you, then you too will abide in the Son and in the Father. And this is the promise that he made to us-eternal life.”
1 John 2:22-25 ESV
I think we would do well to let the Bible define our terms…
Its mohammed bin salman prince of Saudi Arabia
Preterist don’t say that Nero is the Antichrist, false representation.
Has Spirit of antichrist
Nero was an antichrist and yes he was the one described in the NT. It appears to be a dual prophecy; we will probably get another in the end.
Everything is antichrist😂
If you know who it is, you are Lost and left behind !
Revelation 13:18. "Let he who has understanding calculate the number of the beast for it is the name of a man and his number equals 666." Philadelphia is the Birthplace of America and is the same name of one of the 7 churches of revelation. From the center of Philadelphia to the center of Canton Ohio is exactly 333 miles as the crow flies. Canton is where Marilyn Manson was born the Antichrist. From the center of Canton Ohio to the center of Chicago Illinois is exactly 333 miles as the crow flies. Chicago is where Anton Lavey was born. Anton wrote and published the satanic bible in 1969 the same year Manson was born. So from Philly to Canton to Chicago equals exactly 666 miles. No one had thought to break 666 in half and form it into a simple equation, 333+333 = 666.
Marilyn Manson and Anton Lavey became friends after meeting at "the Black House" Anton's house in San Francisco. Mansons best selling album is Antichrist Superstar. Manson has also stated that he wants to be the one remembered for ending Christianity.
Ohhh so Revelation 13 didn’t have any meaning until this current generation? Got it 🎊
@jgeph2.4 Revelation means everything but the end time were not supposed to come until the time was right, when the Antichrist is actually on Earth. It's all 1 big plan. I don't think revelation 13:18 was supposed to be figured out until the time was right and that time is now.
@jgeph2.4 I don't believe revelation 13:18 was supposed to be decoded until the Antichrist was on Earth, well he's on earth and I solved revelation 13:18 after over 20 years of research.
Radical, America-centered, speculative interpretation. Nero was the beast, elsewise the first century readers of the Apocalypse could not have understood the text that John (guided by the Holy Spirit) wrote to THEM.
@@kevinteichroeb6997 like you know anything.
The only place the word 'antichrist' is used in the Bible is First and Second John. According to John, the antichrist was alive in his day, in the first century. To extrapolate and find 'antichrist' in Revelation (also written by John) stretches biblical hermeneutics past the point of rational discourse and makes a mockery of eschatology.
What a ridiculous response. As if all the biblical theologians who understood this phenomenon throughout history and Paul’s and John’s use of the OT apocalyptic to describe this, is irrelevant. They got these ideas from the OT. Analogy of Scripture is a doctrine that would profit in learning before making ignorant comments like this.
@AboundingGraceRadio Firstly, thank you for your gracious Christian response. Secondly, the only school of theology that equated the antichrist with some future 'dictator' is Dispensationalism which was unheard of for nearly 1,900 years of eschatological theology until 'revealed' to Darby through a young girl's ecstatic vision. My interpretation is not 'ridiculous' as you assert; it was mainstream Christian theology for nearly 2 millennia.
@@kevinteichroeb6997 The AC & AC spirit were indeed alive in the 1st century. Paul told the Thessalonians about "him" directly, saying that the "one" who restrained his rise to power would do so until taken out of the way. Why couldn't Paul use plain designations in his epistle? We know the answer.
Fast forward to later Christians like Clement and Lactantius (2nd/3rd cent), who both expected a future-to-them antichrist figure. Tertullian in his "Apology," XXXII from the 2nd century, specifically prayed for "Rome's duration," knowing that IT was the restraining force that prevented the rise of the Papacy or that seat of authority and perdition that would set itself up in God's church as God on earth. He understood Paul's words. Hence, the reason Paul could not be specific in his epistles, as he would have invited persecution from Rome had he spoken of Rome's future demise.
476 AD is when the last western Roman emperor was deposed, leading to the rise of the Papacy within 100 years. The AC, as these gentleman discussed, is not a single man, but a succession of men throughout time. However, the 2 Thes. 2 son of perdition is a specific succession of these men that are still here today. Yes, the Papacy is still here, along with his SOJ General & his Jesuit army, whom Historicists believe is the earth beast of Rev. 13:11 with horns like a lamb.
The Vatican still very much reigns over the kings of the earth today, which is why all world leaders, including US presidents, must pay homage to the man in Rome. Go search the net for any US president + Pope, and you will see with your own eyes. They all must sit at the Pope's big brown desk across from him like he's the mafia don of the world. It's because he is.
That's the unsettling part of this video; that the church today does not recognize who the man of sin STILL IS like our predecessors did and paid with their lives. If we don't know who the "beast" is, and only four beast kingdoms were prophesied in Daniel 2, 7, & 8, then how will the church be prepared for what's coming? Right now most of them believe the false futurist, pre-trib rapture narrative. Sadly, that will lead them all back to Rome and they have no idea because they believe Jesuit, counter-reformation lies.
The comment followed a nonsensical one. Biblical theology works together with systematic. We’re not dispensational, thoroughly Reformed. It was an accepted category of explaining the biblical phenomenon of Antichrist. Spend some time in sound Reformed theology along with even many church fathers and you won’t make these kinds of statements. Geerhardus Vos would be a good start to see the consensus of BT with the analogia fidei on the matter. May God give you much grace in this matter.
@@AboundingGraceRadio That was a slightly kinder response. I have read the church fathers at extreme length. What surprises me is the fact that you declare your position as 'Reformed' which dogmatically declared the Pope as antichrist. Calvin himself was almost certainly post-millennial in his eschatology which demands a partial preterist view of Revelation (and Daniel).
According to the Bible it is the Roman Catholic Church
Simply impossible
@ check Daniel 7 Daniel 9 and Revelation 13
@ these chapter seem to enforce my original comment
@ check the characteristics of the Little Horn in Daniel 7 and Daniel 9 and you can see they all match with the history of the Roman Catholic Church. In fact up until few years ago all the reformers throughout history since the 1400s believed those passages were referring to the Papal system. But now with the ecumenical movement and the infiltration of freemasonry into Protestantism that side of history isn’t taught
@ as to Daniel 7&9, how so? Also, as best as I understand it, Freemason are majority protestants.
there is no such thing as an anti-christ ... made up.
@@batminton7467 there is one the Bible calls it also ‘the son of perdition’ which is a title given to Judas Iscariot. Judas pretended to be a follower of Jesus but betrayed him, so the Antichrist is a system that pretends to be Christian yet has changed the commandments of Jesus and sets himself up as God on earth. Check out the Pope sitting on a
white throne between angels surrounded by 4 men and see what Isaiah and Revelation say about the throne of God…
satan is is the antichrist
2 John 1:7 For many deceivers have gone out into the world, those who do not confess the coming of Jesus Christ in the flesh. Such a one is the deceiver and the antichrist.
You have alot to learn brother you sound very lost and just need Some one to talk to so why not talk to the lord