Not an "um" or an "ah". But a continuous unbroken flow of rational, logical information. What a pleasure to listen to. A lecturer of the highest order. Bravo!
Stop it, he's not logical. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
He is very personable and articulate. I enjoy listening to him. Of course he is an atheist as are most physicists. They believe in one dimension only; the elemental. They do not know of or acknowledge three dimensions: Consciousness; Mind; Elements. Consciousness being fundamental; Mind; elemental and the physical dimension also elemental; grosser or denser elements; all emerging with quantum events. That is why there is the hard problem of consciousness for atheistic philosophy and science as they see one dimension only.
I’m 28 years old. I’m not a student of any kind. I attended a few semesters of community college. My job has NOTHING to do with quantum mechanics, academia, or particularly difficult concepts. I’m just someone that loves to learn. Knowledge is a gift. The more you learn about existence the more beautiful it reveals itself to be. Every academic field, every culture, even different beliefs systems, allow more of the universe’s richness to come through. Instead of chasing one truth, learn to see the many truths that people use to interpret the world. You have one too. Thank you Sean Carroll for spreading knowledge in a concise and entertaining way. You’re a cool human.
Thank god for the internet so that people like you and me -- another person with no knowledge of physics but who loves to learn - can access such amazing content as this, so easily!
Sean says that he never gets tired of being amazed at the human imagination and at Nature's stubborn insistence on following its rules of physics. But I will never get tired of listening to Sean describe how this universe works. His enthusiasm, his clarity, and his stubborn insistence on giving a fair hearing to all sides of controversies in physics is joyful to behold. Sean refuses to remain stuck in the mud of mysteries, but instead lays out the directions we can go and patiently awaits the march of science to determine the best direction. He reminds me of the "color commentator" at NFL football games. He doesn't just give "nuts and bolts" statistics of how many yards were gained. He tells stories of the players on and off the field and how that relates to their performance in the game. We humans may understand math, but we also understand through a good story. Sean is the master color commentator, telling stories that help us appreciate the "action on the field".
Sean's brain is unsound. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
I could listen to Dr. Carroll for hours. Like Brian Greene, Lawrence Krauss, and a few others I watch on a regular basis, his ability to elucidate complex phenomena is amazing.
@Joe Chang I don’t know what you’re smoking but you might want to sit down. I love when people question the validity of science while using technologies that depend on the science they are questioning. Might want to keep your day job dude! 😳
I absolutely love Prof. Sean Carroll's lectures!! He makes it so interesting even for laymen like myself!! He has such vast knowledge and never gets boring!! Love it
He reminds me a little bit of my physics teacher for the year I had to take in college for my biology degree. I never thought I'd find physics that interesting but I did.
Why are people conned by this guy? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
Why don't you try thinking and see Sean for the liar he is? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
Sean is really a great educator. He is able to illustrate very complex subject matter in a very intuitive and passionate manner. I was really never good a physics in high school esp. when it came to the math and the corresponding formulas. Yet, I feel I have gained some basic understanding of the theories presented here and in other lectures by Carroll and folks like Brian Cox, Richard Feynman and others. I am very much into the arts and I find that the arts and the sciences can inform and inspire each other. Connecting it to the real world. It reminds me of the great and beautiful gothic cathedrals that inspire but were only made possible by understanding physics.
He's not even following science. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
I especially liked his interpretation of connecting Einstein's space curvature with quantum geometry versus energy and entanglement. That is the best interpretation I have witnessed of connecting Einstein's 'Classical Interpretation" of gravity with Quantum Field Theory. I have been looking for someone to describe a possibility and this one seems plausible.
But will it be enough to make a theory of everything? In other talks he shows that gravity in the core theory equation is quantum and it is good enough to be accurate one large scale, just like relativity, but not in extreme cases like black holes etc.
The quiz at the end of the lecture joke never gets old. Sean is a great orator. I am just geting into the world of Physics and am really enjoying his talks.
As an engineer who has always been passionate about math and physics, I was intrigued by modern physics, despite neither relativity nor quantum mechanics were part of any course syllabus at my university. I studied these subjects on the side and found them really inspiring, I would go as far as to say that they gave me a novel perspective on life itself. That prompted me to create some online courses on Udemy on Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, special and General Relativity. It’s not my job of course, but I love talking about these topics while using some mathematics for “intuition”.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else.
Thank you for such a great presentation. Dr. Carroll can speak for 24 hours non-stop and I won't fall asleep! Particularly liked his version of explaining the QM anomalies - not by "quantizing" our conventional classical models, but ground up from a native quantum mechanical universe.
45:30 world is made of fields, not particles; matter is vibrations in quantum fields, and fields are pervasive throughout space. Particle vs field view of nature 47:00 features of entanglement; space is emergent 47:30 geometry of space and entanglement 52:00 past and present different because of entropy ; entropy increases over time 54:40 time
Wow, great lecture! I've devoted nearly half my life to studying physics, but I never really thought of it in this way. Sean both explains, at least in part, many of the biggest mysteries of physics and points to new ones. Great job!
Gravity should be updated as such: 13.3321 m/s^2 and the general theory of relativity should be this as a LAW : ((G*2073)R)) --- --- --- That is why we struggle with physics because we believe in Einstein's postulations of physics as such: ( E=m*v*3000) is the Law of Special Relativity.
@@VeganSemihCyprus33 your video is bullshit. I didn't need to see any more than you making the statement that five coins are somehow "related" in their odds. This is the kind of ignorance of statistics that causes problems with the public. Pure bullshit.
you'd be better off studying some science for yourself then listening to some actual lectures, not this bafoon dumbing everything down... you'll never gain any knowledge by listening to lectures like this one
@@demonlord360 regurgitate me better crap drawn from more domains and I'll happily listen and compare it to what Sean Carrol has to offer, but I havent heard a podcast of his in which i didn't learn something
The content is as old as Sean himself. Easy money for him. But Darwin College is feeling great ... only because of his name/fame. Fine presentation though.
@@ericgraham8150 I agree. But it's the same old story over and over again. It seems there is nothing new in physics to tell about. Going deeper means going more mathematical (and further from reality). There's no audience for that ... even at Darwin College! ;-) And that means there's no presentation and money for Sean.
He sets up Schroedinger’s cat experiment beautifully and builds up the explanation to......multiple worlds hypothesis, when you think about it it’s not any more satisfying, now we have neatly infinite copies of the entire universe to accommodate all the possible quantum events. That’s a lot of stuff, I’m not sure this is correct, I’d like to trust him but I’m not sure he advanced the argument very much.
I have read that Newton also was troubled by his theory's "action at a distance". He kept his discomfort to himself, because he, like others of his day, did not believe in action at a distance in physics. In this regard, he did not differ from Einstein whose Relativity did away with action at a distance. I find that Newton was, in this regard, much further ahead of his time than all other physicists until Einstein, to whom he might have said, "You know, I had been thinking along the same lines! I got as far as calculus, but I had not applied it to the geometry of Riemannian 4-dimensional spaces as you did, because Riemann had not yet been born in my day; but I knew something was wrong"
It is an amazing speech worth watching no matter if you love physics or you are not really interested in it. In my opinion everyone would enjoy this lecture and start to think about some incredibly mysterious things around us.
Don't know what you thank him for. His lies? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
He's incredible. Spoke engagingly for an hour with barely a glance at notes. The lady introducing him, however, could scarcely utter a syllable unless her head was lowered and fixed onto her notes.
Thanks! I was looking for comments about who the guy resembles. It is a bit of Q but I also see Adam Baldwin in there. Its like that guy from Classic Game Room has put on Adam Baldwins skin. Still not quite it. There is someone else but it wont come to mind
It's good seeing Sean finally coming into his own skin and accepting the fact that he is responsible for enticing the next generation. Thanks Sean! 💪😎🇺🇲
@Bertrand de Born WOW! Somebody deeply hurted you to make you so angry....but you and some others are the MEN who found out the TRUTH about modern physics....LOL.
I am a complete dunce when it comes to physics but this man brilliantly elucidates and makes genuinely exciting every aspect of the subject in a way that even I can not only understand but also enjoy. Never an umm or an ahh in his monologue his voice holds the attention in the most astonishing way. Ten out of ten! Just riveting!
31:00 Finally we see the casual photo of Everett! Sean wanted to put this in his last book but couldn't secure the rights. He had to use the same straight-laced photo that appears everywhere.
It's now much more clear to me how consiousness is the biggest key factor on every topic that he covered here. His composition and presentation put it right in front of your face on each point, making consiousness the most obvious missing element to every problem, without coloring it in for you like so many other do. Terrific presentation!
this is an Incredible Documentary and i could listen to Sean Carroll for hours, he explains physics in such a way that even if you don't know anything about it '' you will understand what he is saying, *
This man has given me so much insight into how this world is and came to be (after the big bang) and why it is the way it is - and I have never taken a physics class nor have I taken a higher education math class - he is such a joy to listen to and my moments of understanding astound me!
I think the answer to the quantum mystery is just the idea of quantification itself The universe does not have exact numbers to correspond to it what is rather always in a state of flux An example would be saying that I'm 6 ft tall. It's just an approximation. Someone's exact height is always changing but we give an approximate estimate This is the same with all quantification. It's only accurate within the margin of error Height weight, any mathematical description of a system is just an approximation In reality the electron is distributed in a cloud and always will be But when we give mathematical descriptions of a system we're basically giving an approximation that has some utility Therefore all the terms like superposition wave function duality, they're all just terms to give some Precision to something that'll always be Beyond quantification It's like the shape of the Earth you can say it's a sphere or an oblong spheroid and that is more accurate than saying it's flat But the utility is always based on a relative system. in reality the shape of the earth is always changing slightly Anyway can someone hit me back and see how we can get these ideas being discussed by physicists like Sean Carroll I think what I'm saying here is a more basic idea then the many-worlds In reality many worlds is just a an attempt to give Precision to the universe the same way we give Precision to the shape of the Earth. But in reality such linguistic terms will never capture the Nuance nature of reality. I think it's more fundamental to just say that quantification will always be accurate within the margin of error and that the actuality of reality can never be precisely described in any way that is true for all Observers. So again the fundamental mystery or Indescribable nature is due to an attempt to quantify what is beyond quantification in an ultimate sense!
This guy is fantastic and maddening at the same time. ...and so is his talk... Now I got a headache. I'm just a poor chemist - without Ruherford's atom model I don't even have a job!
There are some folk who can make science very exciting without using any wizz bang in the presentation and it is much appreciated. You get the same quiet satisfaction from putting the right ingredients together and baking them into a loaf.
I once quoted Mitch Hedberg while TAing an intro to electronics course because students in the lab couldn’t tell me what a “resistor” does. “I wanna have a job in the ‘kitchen appliance naming’ industry. That seems like a cool job to me. Toaster, blender, refridgerator.… just say what the thing does, and then add ‘-er’! What’s this thing do? It keeps shit fresh. Well, that’s a fresher. I’m going on break.” Crickets. My delivery was so bad.
I totally agree with Joe Gelman below. Sean Carrol is brilliant and inspiring teacher exactly in the tradition of the Great Richard Feynman in whose chair Prof Carroll actually sits both metaphorically and literally as he often points out at the beginnings of his talks. I have some his books in audible format simply because I like the sound of his voice. His proof that Death really is the end (see the youTube video) inspires one to live this one to the full as its the only one you'll get. Of course, if we are simply running as simulations in our own future descendents' super-computers then let's hope no-one switches the power off which would amount to the same thing.
Sean is a great exemple of an open minded scientist, it is very nice to see. Krauss or Neil Degrasse Tyson on the other hand, are the perfect examples of a close minded scientists, almost religious in a sense. If he's asked a question he doesn't know the answer, he will tell you : Look, I can measure the phenomena, if that is not enough for you, you can stay here playing with your '' Whys '', while me and my colleagues continue to go forward. He will then look at you with the most ... arrogant face in the world. Which to me is unnaceptable, in the scientific world. So I totally believe Sean when he says that the scientist that was asking questions was ''gently'' tossed away. Sry for my bad english.
I totally agree with you. A lot of famous science personalities will quickly say, “that’s not my field, go somewhere else for that.” Yet, science in general has colonized other domains of knowledge. Science is the new cosmology and philosophy. The scope of science is accurate but limited, you can’t encapsulate the world with just science; nonetheless, they keep trying.
thanks, Sean, for the splendid lecture on the basic problems of modern physics. surely, understanding of life is fundamentally inportant and can give us a key for the better understanding of quantum mechanics and of our physical reality as a whole (as well as of ourselves in this reality, i guess))
THAT was a fantastic lecture. I only WISH when i did my degree they talked about entropy as information - when i realised that, it kinda clicked! And that when he jokes about "i swiped my arm because the glass was going to fall", thinking about entanglement first, intuitively is backwards, since our whole life experience is centred around us, it was insightful. Great lecture!
This may be profound. It is easier to move through time than space. So "nearby" is preferred. The fastest you can go through space is 45 degrees on reference diagram(speed of light). But 90 degrees of range is available in the Time direction (2x45). SC knows Relativity, so i wonder what implications he may be making?
@@joeboxter3635 people said that about Einstein's black holes. About quantum mechanics, the god particle and anti matter. Basically it's not what he says it's where the math leads to. And every scientists will tell you that at any point anything could be proven different than we thought. Fact is
Science Kermit is best Kermit. Seriously though, I'm become a big fan of Professor Carroll as a science communicator. Hope to hear much more from him in the future!
Does anyone feel that our cross-over from classical to statistical mechanics may have brought us astray? Statistics summarize observations. Statistics shows your the louds, and how clouds move; it don't tell you how the clouds were formed. Statistics can give you intuition, and narrow down theories. But I feel like we are stretching stats to a dimension of abstraction that we've come so far, that we've convinced ourselves that the equations that can explain statistics, are somehow reverberations of the underlying classical truths. Although I find this an insightful path, we must not give up on the pursuit of there being a classical description that we have not yet accounted for the variables for.
When even the Chair of Physics at Cal Tech struggles to explain entropy (hint: an egg is never a good example), we need more clarity on the concept of entropy.
Entropy is defined as dS=deltaQ_rev/T. What in the world is hard to understand about this? A simple interpretation of entropy is the amount of heat energy in a system that can not do useful work (on an external system).
I love listening to his lectures. Such a brilliant man. Judging by his choise of suit and tie he clearly aims at maintaining a low entropy state in style for much longer than Einstein.
One could argue though, by viewing tieknots as a self avoiding random walk on a triangular lattice (see www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~tmf20/TIES/PAPERS/paper_nature.pdf), that a state of even lower entropy could have been achieved by tying the tie into a "Oriental" style tieknot (a tie knot wich requires only four moves: left, right, center, tie), instead of what looks to be a (very stylish) "Half-Windsor" (requiring seven moves: left, right, center, left, right, center, tie). On the other hand, a Half-Windsor looks tidier, so that may make the Sean Carroll system as a whole at least appear less entropic :P
We are able to listen to the talk worth millions of dollars for free without going to any university or institution just because of UA-cam wow did you realise how lucky we are to have UA-cam Thank you
@@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace If the theorem can be theoretically proved in a closed loop backed by axioms, that'll be a good enough thing. For now, it's more like metaphysics, indeed.
@@ingathrise Math works well to understand QM as well the cosmos but it does not look that they are in the right truck or right frame, if every thing is made of light then matter must to be acomodated as the rainbow shows, even light follows atomic waight why not matter?, Einstein, Hubble as well Neuton might be right at the yellow level that we are but as soon we look out to another level they are out of the game because they must to recalibrate to that level. - In quantum mecanics light aplies cause the photon is still light even if it is in the form of a cloud still is light and cant be at all places cause the north are gaseous and south are rocky ones same as our solar system that the inside circle are made by the 4 rocky planets and the gaseous are made by the 4 gaseous ones, the sun is the neutral part as well is the bottom of the system cause we all go in levels even stars. - I do have my channel based in colors as the rainbow based in a Mayan Callender as well a DNA picture. Recomend you to see the video: HOW GOOD IS THE EVIDENCE FOR DARK ENERGY? you might be surprised. If Dr Subir and team are right then my work make sense by speaking of levels, my guess from all I have done is that they will be correct.
I am a layman. I have a relatively limited education, but it seems to me that gravity is such a surprisingly weak force because it is diluted if you will and spread across all the "many worlds" or possible states. The other forces are not and are local to each possible state. Sorry, I'll show myself out . .
That is actually one of the concepts out there, but the standard idea is that it leaks from our "brane", meaning our 3D/4D slice of a higher dimensional object, into those higher dimensions. It's more related to a multiverse idea stemming from String theory, rather than the one stemming from quantum dynamics (but these might turn out to be one and the same, or both active, or both false). What I wonder about is whether the notion of a quantum multiverse fits in that String theory perspective. On the one hand yes, since one could argue that the quantum bifurcation of universes happens in another dimension. On the other hand no, because bifurcation is fractal, instead of plane-filling in nature. If you're right, one could imagine then that if the universe wouldn't split, gravity would be stronger, because it didn't leak. We could perhaps test that in a bubble of Bose-Einstein condensate. Perhaps we would see that gravity is altered inside the bubble, being stronger than otherwise expected.
@Ahura There seems to be no explanation as to why gravity is such a weak force. My guess, if correct, could explain that. String theorists have a similar opinion based on far more knowledge than I bring to the table.
@Ahura Look it up but there are only theories and guesses. I can't see how any of this is testable or how any experiment could be devised to prove it. It seems strange that only gravity would be constant across all dimensions/worlds/branes but if true it would explain why gravity is so weak.
@Ahura I just found this. It's a very short video but might wet your appetite to look outside classical physics. I am really out of my depth here and only class myself as "fascinated." ua-cam.com/video/s7Babitv4Fg/v-deo.html It's a 4 minute clip from 2008 and only speaks of one other parallel universe. Sean Carroll (who's ideas fascinate me the most) takes this much further and theorizes about infinite universes.
But all the forces would be spread out to the other worlds too? By that logic, I don’t think it’s useful to think about the other worlds of the multiple worlds hypothesis as having any effect on our universe, they are disconnected from us are they not?
Addendum : Some more CRAZY question / points : 1) Electron is spinning! 2) Proton is vibrating! 3 ) Both make neutron/s chargeless! 4 )Electron keeps everything entangled as well as in order or in disorder (entropy)! 5) That means electron photon interaction... may help us to understand the theoretical points : a) The -e- is there, when we look at it...and not there, when not looking at it... right...!!!??? Therefore the above points may also suggest the ELECTRON being part of the classical science and photon being part of the quantum science...could lead us to the territory of GUT...!!! That means all the theories of all those famous Scientists are the contributors for the present TOE and GUT... in micro and macro levels... A BIT- BY - BIT...!!! THANKS AGAIN DR. SEAN CARROLL...!!!
Look at it like a textbook. Text books don't radically change they get updated He is updating it a little bit and clarifying and enhancing butt, it's the same basic textbook of information.
Strange how even Sean Carroll gets this wrong; In the bullet cluster the red is indeed where the mass is. However, the blue is not where the mass is but instead where the gravitation is. If the blue was also where the mass is the blue would have behaved just as the red did. Ha yes, gravitation in the absence of mass is the new conundrum of modern physics. {LIVE Science; Forums, History and Culture; Culture History & Science; What is a living individual and is it naturally universally mobile?}
Sean doesn't even follow physics. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
Math, like numbers, is a language humans invented to describe relationships more usefully than words. It chokes me when people talk about math like it's something discovered that was used by god(s) to create our universe (if it is a universe).
DCLS , there is a very simple channel wide flag to flush comments with links as they are submitted - switching it on avoids a lot of crap spam comments , so please consider this service to your viewers
Not an "um" or an "ah". But a continuous unbroken flow of rational, logical information. What a pleasure to listen to. A lecturer of the highest order. Bravo!
Their is nothing rational about Sean Carroll. He is the poster boy for ignorance in science.
Stop it, he's not logical. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
😂. O sancta simplicitas! Get thee to Hoffman😂
And with a delightfully modulated voice
He is very personable and articulate. I enjoy listening to him. Of course he is an atheist as are most physicists. They believe in one dimension only; the elemental. They do not know of or acknowledge three dimensions: Consciousness; Mind; Elements.
Consciousness being fundamental; Mind; elemental and the physical dimension also elemental; grosser or denser elements; all emerging with quantum events. That is why there is the hard problem of consciousness for atheistic philosophy and science as they see one dimension only.
I’m 28 years old. I’m not a student of any kind. I attended a few semesters of community college. My job has NOTHING to do with quantum mechanics, academia, or particularly difficult concepts. I’m just someone that loves to learn. Knowledge is a gift. The more you learn about existence the more beautiful it reveals itself to be. Every academic field, every culture, even different beliefs systems, allow more of the universe’s richness to come through. Instead of chasing one truth, learn to see the many truths that people use to interpret the world. You have one too.
Thank you Sean Carroll for spreading knowledge in a concise and entertaining way. You’re a cool human.
"...Instead of chasing one truth, learn to see the many truths that people use to interpret the world.""
This just
Thank god for the internet so that people like you and me -- another person with no knowledge of physics but who loves to learn - can access such amazing content as this, so easily!
Sean says that he never gets tired of being amazed at the human imagination and at Nature's stubborn insistence on following its rules of physics. But I will never get tired of listening to Sean describe how this universe works. His enthusiasm, his clarity, and his stubborn insistence on giving a fair hearing to all sides of controversies in physics is joyful to behold. Sean refuses to remain stuck in the mud of mysteries, but instead lays out the directions we can go and patiently awaits the march of science to determine the best direction.
He reminds me of the "color commentator" at NFL football games. He doesn't just give "nuts and bolts" statistics of how many yards were gained. He tells stories of the players on and off the field and how that relates to their performance in the game. We humans may understand math, but we also understand through a good story. Sean is the master color commentator, telling stories that help us appreciate the "action on the field".
can you give opinion for this video ua-cam.com/video/KsIsXvvlr3c/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/SOWt2fBI1VI/v-deo.html
Thank you for taking the time to articulate this so well! Your view absolutely speaks for me and I think for many others too.
He is wrong , just as wrong as the claims of religion.
That`s how wrong he is.
Hubble`s discovery kills dark matter and dark energy.
This is very well written
I think Sean Carroll is such an articulate and brilliant man. If I had half this man's brain, he'd certainly want it back.
Good one👍
You had me in the first half ngl 😂
/
S
Indeed - and I've watched and listened to the best. And this man is the best!
Sean's brain is unsound. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
I could listen to Dr. Carroll for hours. Like Brian Greene, Lawrence Krauss, and a few others I watch on a regular basis, his ability to elucidate complex phenomena is amazing.
Thinking about a comment, then looked at yours and it said exactly what I was thinking 🤔 .....Ditto
Listen long enough and you will find out how shallow these lectures are... Compilation, repetition, ego...
@Joe Chang I don’t know what you’re smoking but you might want to sit down. I love when people question the validity of science while using technologies that depend on the science they are questioning. Might want to keep your day job dude! 😳
@Joe Chang Let me guess. According to you this is all caused by a supernatural being for which you have concrete evidence of its existence. Oh, okay.
I largely prefer him over Brian Greene tbh. It's like he's is constantly trying to be "hip" and "funny" and to me it just feels incredibly awkward
I absolutely love Prof. Sean Carroll's lectures!! He makes it so interesting even for laymen like myself!! He has such vast knowledge and never gets boring!! Love it
He reminds me a little bit of my physics teacher for the year I had to take in college for my biology degree. I never thought I'd find physics that interesting but I did.
I like all his lectures after he hopped left at Cambridge from my perspective.
Why are people conned by this guy? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
Sean is a phenomenal speaker . Thank you Mr Carroll . 3:51 for those that don't need an intro
Thanks
bump
He has that gift of speaking with a smile in his voice.
I thought the same as the first part of your comment, scroll and it's #1
I think it's "Dr."
This man is a gift. Truly in the tradition of Feynman. A world-class elucidator of high science.
Hear here. I see "Sean Carrol" and I click. And I watch. PS check out Joe Rogan's episode with Sean. You will not regret it.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334 I have watched the Joe Rogan episodes with Sean Carrol many times, and learn something new everytime. Excellent.
Check out Sean's podcast- Mindscape, incredibly varied guests.
I think you need to read more about Feynman.
@@paulmichaelfreedman8334
True, I had to watch it twice and perhaps a third time in the future, it is amazing.
Thanks for making these concepts so accessible to the general public. Again, another very effective presentation by Sean Carroll.
.
@Brad Watson
....
,
,,,
.
..
,..
.
,.., ,..,
.
..
.,
.
,!!,!.
? . ,...,... ,?. .
?..
.
.?
...
..
.
,.?,..
,, ..
.
Why don't you try thinking and see Sean for the liar he is? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
Sean is really a great educator. He is able to illustrate very complex subject matter in a very intuitive and passionate manner. I was really never good a physics in high school esp. when it came to the math and the corresponding formulas. Yet, I feel I have gained some basic understanding of the theories presented here and in other lectures by Carroll and folks like Brian Cox, Richard Feynman and others. I am very much into the arts and I find that the arts and the sciences can inform and inspire each other. Connecting it to the real world. It reminds me of the great and beautiful gothic cathedrals that inspire but were only made possible by understanding physics.
He's not even following science. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
I've loved listening to this man's lectures and books for the last 15 years
I especially liked his interpretation of connecting Einstein's space curvature with quantum geometry versus energy and entanglement. That is the best interpretation I have witnessed of connecting Einstein's 'Classical Interpretation" of gravity with Quantum Field Theory. I have been looking for someone to describe a possibility and this one seems plausible.
Yeah. That was pretty mindblowing to me.
But will it be enough to make a theory of everything? In other talks he shows that gravity in the core theory equation is quantum and it is good enough to be accurate one large scale, just like relativity, but not in extreme cases like black holes etc.
@@martenjustrell446 ua-cam.com/video/KsIsXvvlr3c/v-deo.html can you give opinion for this topic
ua-cam.com/video/SOWt2fBI1VI/v-deo.html
One of the great communicators of our generation. I’m so glad that these have been recorded so I can share with my children.
The quiz at the end of the lecture joke never gets old. Sean is a great orator. I am just geting into the world of Physics and am really enjoying his talks.
As an engineer who has always been passionate about math and physics, I was intrigued by modern physics, despite neither relativity nor quantum mechanics were part of any course syllabus at my university. I studied these subjects on the side and found them really inspiring, I would go as far as to say that they gave me a novel perspective on life itself. That prompted me to create some online courses on Udemy on Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Field Theory, special and General Relativity. It’s not my job of course, but I love talking about these topics while using some mathematics for “intuition”.
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. (More spatial curvature). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are actually a part of the quarks. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" make sense based on this concept. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else.
In other words, you are a kid who failed high school. :-)
@@lepidoptera9337 I was pretty good actually !
@@math.physics That's what all the failed kids say on the internet. In any case, that's between you and your school. :-)
@@lepidoptera9337 I don't think a "failed kid" can teach QFT, GR or other subjects :).
Thank you for such a great presentation. Dr. Carroll can speak for 24 hours non-stop and I won't fall asleep! Particularly liked his version of explaining the QM anomalies - not by "quantizing" our conventional classical models, but ground up from a native quantum mechanical universe.
I came for the physics, I keep coming back to overcome my insomnia
I thought it was just me .
I tuned in to fall asleep, but I'm finding this is interesting.
Now it's harder to fall asleep.
Word 😶 Can also recommend Brian Cox
@@douglasnordwall3482 Cool, I just did. He's a bundle of excitement! A great way to get people interested in these topics. Thanks for the tip.
My favorite for that are these fusion power lectures by Steven Cowley but I can't keep re-listening.
45:30 world is made of fields, not particles; matter is vibrations in quantum fields, and fields are pervasive throughout space. Particle vs field view of nature 47:00 features of entanglement; space is emergent 47:30 geometry of space and entanglement 52:00 past and present different because of entropy ; entropy increases over time 54:40 time
This really is as good as it gets. He knows the material and knows how to explain it.
I’ve got forced to be all ears by his excellence of knowledge and skill of storytelling.
Wow, great lecture! I've devoted nearly half my life to studying physics, but I never really thought of it in this way. Sean both explains, at least in part, many of the biggest mysteries of physics and points to new ones. Great job!
ua-cam.com/video/SOWt2fBI1VI/v-deo.html
Gravity should be updated as such: 13.3321 m/s^2 and the general theory of relativity should be this as a LAW : ((G*2073)R)) --- --- --- That is why we struggle with physics because we believe in Einstein's postulations of physics as such: ( E=m*v*3000) is the Law of Special Relativity.
@@ronerickson8083 What have you been smoking???
So glad you upload these to UA-cam. Thank you. 🙏
Thanks for posting to those who weren't present in the space-time in which the lecture took place.
Hey, it's a girl!
It's probably not a girl.
@@Chris-Humblest Does the fact that I'm not a night elf bother you as much?
correction: the space-time wave function :)
This video needs to be shared far and wide so we will not ruin nature: ua-cam.com/video/ELjgTs7BFC4/v-deo.html
@@VeganSemihCyprus33 your video is bullshit. I didn't need to see any more than you making the statement that five coins are somehow "related" in their odds. This is the kind of ignorance of statistics that causes problems with the public. Pure bullshit.
this man is an intellectual hero, THANK YOU FOR ALL THAT YOU DO to bring science to the masses
you'd be better off studying some science for yourself then listening to some actual lectures, not this bafoon dumbing everything down... you'll never gain any knowledge by listening to lectures like this one
@@stevenash9282 what qualifies you to knock Sean Caroll?
Science in the masses is what killed all the gods, and they have been dead for ages now..
@@craigjenquin3416 he is a person with a brain, and listening is not the same as knowledge. Anyone can regurgitate crap they've heard.
@@demonlord360 regurgitate me better crap drawn from more domains and I'll happily listen and compare it to what Sean Carrol has to offer, but I havent heard a podcast of his in which i didn't learn something
Once saw him in a hotel, introduced myself and got to compliment him about his youtube lectures. Probably was a few weeks before this lecture.
I enjoy listening to Sean Carroll not only for the content but I love his voice and how he draws it out at the end of a sentence.
Same, do you listen to his podcast?
Ron Cox - No - I didn’t know he was doing that . Will look it up. Thanks.
The content is as old as Sean himself. Easy money for him. But Darwin College is feeling great ... only because of his name/fame. Fine presentation though.
Yes... I enjoy listening to him too.. right?
@@ericgraham8150 I agree. But it's the same old story over and over again. It seems there is nothing new in physics to tell about. Going deeper means going more mathematical (and further from reality). There's no audience for that ... even at Darwin College! ;-) And that means there's no presentation and money for Sean.
He sets up Schroedinger’s cat experiment beautifully and builds up the explanation to......multiple worlds hypothesis, when you think about it it’s not any more satisfying, now we have neatly infinite copies of the entire universe to accommodate all the possible quantum events. That’s a lot of stuff, I’m not sure this is correct, I’d like to trust him but I’m not sure he advanced the argument very much.
I love listening to Sean Carrol. ❤
December 24, 2020
I have read that Newton also was troubled by his theory's "action at a distance". He kept his discomfort to himself, because he, like others of his day, did not believe in action at a distance in physics. In this regard, he did not differ from Einstein whose Relativity did away with action at a distance. I find that Newton was, in this regard, much further ahead of his time than all other physicists until Einstein, to whom he might have said, "You know, I had been thinking along the same lines! I got as far as calculus, but I had not applied it to the geometry of Riemannian 4-dimensional spaces as you did, because Riemann had not yet been born in my day; but I knew something was wrong"
Sean has a really good tailor in this version of the Everettian Multiverse. Looking respectable is half of the way to a successful presentation.
It is an amazing speech worth watching no matter if you love physics or you are not really interested in it. In my opinion everyone would enjoy this lecture and start to think about some incredibly mysterious things around us.
I keep watching your lectures in hopes that someday I’ll understand something!
U
This is one of the best physics lectures I've ever listened to
This was an EXCELLENT lecture, thank you Prof. Carroll and thank you for uploading it.
Don't know what you thank him for. His lies? 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
The explanation for complexity as a middle way between no entropy and a lot of entropy simply blowed my mind. Amazing amazing talk
Excellent presentation! For a novice person like me, this was an eye opener!! Bravo!!!
Nice to see that Andy Bernard who works in Dunder-Mifflin in day and teaches physics in the night.
I have a physics degree from Caltech and I'm sure this is the first time I've seen a Caltech physics professor in a suit and tie. :)
That's entropy for you!
You must be one of those outcast physicists. They don't invite you to anywhere important.
HaHa:) I’m not into the suit look. Makes physicists look like economists.
@@SolaceEasy It's all about the tweed with physicists.
I wish I was intelligent enough to grasp physics
He's incredible. Spoke engagingly for an hour with barely a glance at notes. The lady introducing him, however, could scarcely utter a syllable unless her head was lowered and fixed onto her notes.
Always appreciate your lectures, thank you!
Carroll breaking it down in understandable consumable chunks. Fantastic.
Big Thank You for the excellent presentation !
A great lecture and a well tailored suit. Looking sharp Dr. Carroll
This guy reminds me of star treks 'Q'.
Nailed it!
Thanks! I was looking for comments about who the guy resembles. It is a bit of Q but I also see Adam Baldwin in there. Its like that guy from Classic Game Room has put on Adam Baldwins skin. Still not quite it. There is someone else but it wont come to mind
Try this. Imagine he is only mouthing the words and Brent Spiner is behind that curtain reading the words off a script in to a mic
Isn't there some comic or comedian that he looks and sounds like?? Now I can't remember the name, but I'm sure that's who he reminds me of.
Yep, thought the same. John Mulaney.
It's good seeing Sean finally coming into his own skin and accepting the fact that he is responsible for enticing the next generation. Thanks Sean! 💪😎🇺🇲
Thank you Darwin College for this excellent upload, with Dr. Sean Carroll.
@Bertrand de Born WOW! Somebody deeply hurted you to make you so angry....but you and some others are the MEN who found out the TRUTH about modern physics....LOL.
I am a complete dunce when it comes to physics but this man brilliantly elucidates and makes genuinely exciting every aspect of the subject in a way that even I can not only understand but also enjoy. Never an umm or an ahh in his monologue his voice holds the attention in the most astonishing way. Ten out of ten! Just riveting!
Excellent lecture, bringing science to everyone with clarity and humour - even with a bit of a tuff audience!!
31:00 Finally we see the casual photo of Everett!
Sean wanted to put this in his last book but couldn't secure the rights. He had to use the same straight-laced photo that appears everywhere.
40:48 - The start of a very fascinating and applicable topic!
It's now much more clear to me how consiousness is the biggest key factor on every topic that he covered here.
His composition and presentation put it right in front of your face on each point, making consiousness the most obvious missing element to every problem, without coloring it in for you like so many other do.
Terrific presentation!
this is an Incredible Documentary and i could listen to Sean Carroll for hours, he explains physics in such a way that even if you don't know anything about it '' you will understand what he is saying, *
No cats were harmed in the making of this presentation.
That's only in ur reality
Can you prove it?
Damn!
My ferret was hurt
...but check all parallel universes
This man has given me so much insight into how this world is and came to be (after the big bang) and why it is the way it is - and I have never taken a physics class nor have I taken a higher education math class - he is such a joy to listen to and my moments of understanding astound me!
I think the answer to the quantum mystery is just the idea of quantification itself
The universe does not have exact numbers to correspond to it what is rather always in a state of flux
An example would be saying that I'm 6 ft tall. It's just an approximation. Someone's exact height is always changing but we give an approximate estimate
This is the same with all quantification. It's only accurate within the margin of error
Height weight, any mathematical description of a system is just an approximation
In reality the electron is distributed in a cloud and always will be
But when we give mathematical descriptions of a system we're basically giving an approximation that has some utility
Therefore all the terms like superposition wave function duality, they're all just terms to give some Precision to something that'll always be Beyond quantification
It's like the shape of the Earth you can say it's a sphere or an oblong spheroid and that is more accurate than saying it's flat
But the utility is always based on a relative system.
in reality the shape of the earth is always changing slightly
Anyway can someone hit me back and see how we can get these ideas being discussed by physicists like Sean Carroll
I think what I'm saying here is a more basic idea then the many-worlds
In reality many worlds is just a an attempt to give Precision to the universe the same way we give Precision to the shape of the Earth. But in reality such linguistic terms will never capture the Nuance nature of reality. I think it's more fundamental to just say that quantification will always be accurate within the margin of error and that the actuality of reality can never be precisely described in any way that is true for all Observers.
So again the fundamental mystery or Indescribable nature is due to an attempt to quantify what is beyond quantification in an ultimate sense!
cris P /// Your brain seems to switch itself off randomly!
This guy is fantastic and maddening at the same time.
...and so is his talk... Now I got a headache. I'm just a poor chemist - without Ruherford's atom model I don't even have a job!
wow, i just had my most enjoyable hour for a long time. this is great!
There are some folk who can make science very exciting without using any wizz bang in the presentation and it is much appreciated. You get the same quiet satisfaction from putting the right ingredients together and baking them into a loaf.
ua-cam.com/video/SOWt2fBI1VI/v-deo.html
I felt the same way!
Everytime an artist make something social and intelligent it has artistic integrity. That only possible in a created universe.
1:01:46 When I looked at that diagram on the right, I could have sworn I saw "latte" on the time axis.
What an exceptional communicator Sean Carroll is. And to think, it’s only his side job.
Always enjoy your talks, but this was one of the best. Thanks!
I once quoted Mitch Hedberg while TAing an intro to electronics course because students in the lab couldn’t tell me what a “resistor” does.
“I wanna have a job in the ‘kitchen appliance naming’ industry. That seems like a cool job to me. Toaster, blender, refridgerator.… just say what the thing does, and then add ‘-er’!
What’s this thing do?
It keeps shit fresh.
Well, that’s a fresher. I’m going on break.”
Crickets. My delivery was so bad.
22:30 Sick laser pointer skills.
How to trivialize a great speaker..grow up
@@corneliuslinneball3785 what... how is that even related. It's just a fun moment in the lecture.
I totally agree with Joe Gelman below. Sean Carrol is brilliant and inspiring teacher exactly in the tradition of the Great Richard Feynman in whose chair Prof Carroll actually sits both metaphorically and literally as he often points out at the beginnings of his talks. I have some his books in audible format simply because I like the sound of his voice. His proof that Death really is the end (see the youTube video) inspires one to live this one to the full as its the only one you'll get. Of course, if we are simply running as simulations in our own future descendents' super-computers then let's hope no-one switches the power off which would amount to the same thing.
Sean is the man!
I love Sean Carrol. His mouth opens and I’m filled with entertainment. Awesome talk.
So you like eating bullshit, eh?
Sean is a great exemple of an open minded scientist, it is very nice to see.
Krauss or Neil Degrasse Tyson on the other hand, are the perfect examples of a close minded scientists, almost religious in a sense. If he's asked a question he doesn't know the answer, he will tell you : Look, I can measure the phenomena, if that is not enough for you, you can stay here playing with your '' Whys '', while me and my colleagues continue to go forward. He will then look at you with the most ... arrogant face in the world.
Which to me is unnaceptable, in the scientific world. So I totally believe Sean when he says that the scientist that was asking questions was ''gently'' tossed away. Sry for my bad english.
I totally agree with you. A lot of famous science personalities will quickly say, “that’s not my field, go somewhere else for that.” Yet, science in general has colonized other domains of knowledge. Science is the new cosmology and philosophy. The scope of science is accurate but limited, you can’t encapsulate the world with just science; nonetheless, they keep trying.
One of the best I came across...... Outstanding.
thanks, Sean, for the splendid lecture on the basic problems of modern physics. surely, understanding of life is fundamentally inportant and can give us a key for the better understanding of quantum mechanics and of our physical reality as a whole (as well as of ourselves in this reality, i guess))
What a privilege to hear this man! Wonderful time to be alive.
THAT was a fantastic lecture. I only WISH when i did my degree they talked about entropy as information - when i realised that, it kinda clicked! And that when he jokes about "i swiped my arm because the glass was going to fall", thinking about entanglement first, intuitively is backwards, since our whole life experience is centred around us, it was insightful. Great lecture!
gepisar, forgive me for pointing out but "centred around" something/anything is a meaningless construction.
@@ccahill2322 great! We take what meaning we can.
Sean Carroll and Brian Greene ... even I understand now the basics of QF... great speakers!
Ah yes. Quantum fysics.
"Nearby is just, a colourful way of talking about, the amount of entanglement between abstract quantum degrees of freedom." Sean Carroll
*of empty space!
You know, the original "Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose" still makes a better lyric.
This may be profound. It is easier to move through time than space. So "nearby" is preferred. The fastest you can go through space is 45 degrees on reference diagram(speed of light). But 90 degrees of range is available in the Time direction (2x45). SC knows Relativity, so i wonder what implications he may be making?
Finally, a smidgeon of comprehension comes my way. Excellent lecture.
"It's always good to do experiments to see what happens, so let's do this one..." And then someone turns the lights off.
Stanislav can you give opinion for this topic : ua-cam.com/video/KsIsXvvlr3c/v-deo.html
i could listen to him forever
There's a superposition of me where one of me fully understands everything in this video and the other does not.
@@joeboxter3635 wow . Who what where why , would you sit to debate him in this timeline?
That is actually very funnt
@@joeboxter3635 people said that about Einstein's black holes. About quantum mechanics, the god particle and anti matter.
Basically it's not what he says it's where the math leads to. And every scientists will tell you that at any point anything could be proven different than we thought.
Fact is
sorry, the multiverse only has all the possible superpositions, not every superposition!
@@mangalores-x_x sick quantum burn
Science Kermit is best Kermit.
Seriously though, I'm become a big fan of Professor Carroll as a science communicator. Hope to hear much more from him in the future!
My socks are also in superposition (each of them is both left and right at the same time) until I put them on)))
Actually that's brilliant
😌
Does anyone feel that our cross-over from classical to statistical mechanics may have brought us astray? Statistics summarize observations. Statistics shows your the louds, and how clouds move; it don't tell you how the clouds were formed. Statistics can give you intuition, and narrow down theories. But I feel like we are stretching stats to a dimension of abstraction that we've come so far, that we've convinced ourselves that the equations that can explain statistics, are somehow reverberations of the underlying classical truths. Although I find this an insightful path, we must not give up on the pursuit of there being a classical description that we have not yet accounted for the variables for.
* nice Mitch Hedberg reference. My man!
When even the Chair of Physics at Cal Tech struggles to explain entropy (hint: an egg is never a good example), we need more clarity on the concept of entropy.
Entropy is defined as dS=deltaQ_rev/T. What in the world is hard to understand about this? A simple interpretation of entropy is the amount of heat energy in a system that can not do useful work (on an external system).
I love listening to his lectures. Such a brilliant man. Judging by his choise of suit and tie he clearly aims at maintaining a low entropy state in style for much longer than Einstein.
One could argue though, by viewing tieknots as a self avoiding random walk on a triangular lattice (see www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~tmf20/TIES/PAPERS/paper_nature.pdf), that a state of even lower entropy could have been achieved by tying the tie into a "Oriental" style tieknot (a tie knot wich requires only four moves: left, right, center, tie), instead of what looks to be a (very stylish) "Half-Windsor" (requiring seven moves: left, right, center, left, right, center, tie).
On the other hand, a Half-Windsor looks tidier, so that may make the Sean Carroll system as a whole at least appear less entropic :P
@@impactguide I like that your joke links to a nature paper
We are able to listen to the talk worth millions of dollars for free without going to any university or institution just because of UA-cam wow did you realise how lucky we are to have UA-cam Thank you
My man!!!
I have never learned more about quantum physics in any other video.
This is the first lecture regarding quantum mechanics that I can fully understand. Truly remarkable.
still they cant understand the cosmos nither QM. seems we are just in medle space of them.
Surely we are still pursuing the truth, but this man makes quantum mechanics much more approachable.
@@ingathrise He is good at speaking ideas as well clear to me but are they in the right frame?
@@SernasHeptaDimesionalSpace If the theorem can be theoretically proved in a closed loop backed by axioms, that'll be a good enough thing. For now, it's more like metaphysics, indeed.
@@ingathrise Math works well to understand QM as well the cosmos but it does not look that they are in the right truck or right frame, if every thing is made of light then matter must to be acomodated as the rainbow shows, even light follows atomic waight why not matter?, Einstein, Hubble as well Neuton might be right at the yellow level that we are but as soon we look out to another level they are out of the game because they must to recalibrate to that level. - In quantum mecanics light aplies cause the photon is still light even if it is in the form of a cloud still is light and cant be at all places cause the north are gaseous and south are rocky ones same as our solar system that the inside circle are made by the 4 rocky planets and the gaseous are made by the 4 gaseous ones, the sun is the neutral part as well is the bottom of the system cause we all go in levels even stars. - I do have my channel based in colors as the rainbow based in a Mayan Callender as well a DNA picture.
Recomend you to see the video: HOW GOOD IS THE EVIDENCE FOR DARK ENERGY? you might be surprised. If Dr Subir and team are right then my work make sense by speaking of levels, my guess from all I have done is that they will be correct.
I highly recommend Prof. Carroll's youtube channel. And extra points, if I may be so bold, for the Mitch Hedberg mention!
I think Carroll also has a podcast, if anyone still bothers with those !
(Will search myself !)
podcasts.apple.com/gb/podcast/sean-carrolls-mindscape-science-society-philosophy/id1406534739
Atoms are like Toy Story's characters, when nobody's looking they have their own life, when somebody looks they stop.
ANDY'S COMING!
Or like that ghost in the Super Mario games
That's a good explanation of the universe and beyond!
You just perfectly described my ding dong.
Ha!
Sean Carroll make science sensible and lives on the cutting edge of science...
I am a layman. I have a relatively limited education, but it seems to me that gravity is such a surprisingly weak force because it is diluted if you will and spread across all the "many worlds" or possible states. The other forces are not and are local to each possible state.
Sorry, I'll show myself out . .
That is actually one of the concepts out there, but the standard idea is that it leaks from our "brane", meaning our 3D/4D slice of a higher dimensional object, into those higher dimensions. It's more related to a multiverse idea stemming from String theory, rather than the one stemming from quantum dynamics (but these might turn out to be one and the same, or both active, or both false).
What I wonder about is whether the notion of a quantum multiverse fits in that String theory perspective. On the one hand yes, since one could argue that the quantum bifurcation of universes happens in another dimension. On the other hand no, because bifurcation is fractal, instead of plane-filling in nature.
If you're right, one could imagine then that if the universe wouldn't split, gravity would be stronger, because it didn't leak. We could perhaps test that in a bubble of Bose-Einstein condensate. Perhaps we would see that gravity is altered inside the bubble, being stronger than otherwise expected.
@Ahura There seems to be no explanation as to why gravity is such a weak force. My guess, if correct, could explain that. String theorists have a similar opinion based on far more knowledge than I bring to the table.
@Ahura Look it up but there are only theories and guesses. I can't see how any of this is testable or how any experiment could be devised to prove it. It seems strange that only gravity would be constant across all dimensions/worlds/branes but if true it would explain why gravity is so weak.
@Ahura I just found this. It's a very short video but might wet your appetite to look outside classical physics. I am really out of my depth here and only class myself as "fascinated." ua-cam.com/video/s7Babitv4Fg/v-deo.html It's a 4 minute clip from 2008 and only speaks of one other parallel universe. Sean Carroll (who's ideas fascinate me the most) takes this much further and theorizes about infinite universes.
But all the forces would be spread out to the other worlds too? By that logic, I don’t think it’s useful to think about the other worlds of the multiple worlds hypothesis as having any effect on our universe, they are disconnected from us are they not?
Addendum :
Some more CRAZY question / points :
1) Electron is spinning!
2) Proton is vibrating!
3 ) Both make
neutron/s chargeless!
4 )Electron keeps everything entangled as well as in order or in disorder (entropy)!
5) That means electron photon interaction... may help us to understand the theoretical points :
a)
The -e- is there, when we look at it...and not there, when not looking at it... right...!!!???
Therefore the above points may also suggest the ELECTRON being part of the classical science and photon being part of the quantum science...could lead us to the territory of GUT...!!!
That means all the theories of all those famous Scientists are the contributors for the present TOE and GUT... in micro and macro levels...
A BIT- BY - BIT...!!!
THANKS AGAIN DR. SEAN CARROLL...!!!
"...a whole nother talk..."
22:34 His aim with the laser pointer was so accurate before he even turned it on
Love S.C but this is the same lecture now for a decade...we need some new science!
Look at it like a textbook. Text books don't radically change they get updated
He is updating it a little bit and clarifying and enhancing butt, it's the same basic textbook of information.
Milan Siroky that's why you should think for yourself!
Strange how even Sean Carroll gets this wrong; In the bullet cluster the red is indeed where the mass is. However, the blue is not where the mass is but instead where the gravitation is. If the blue was also where the mass is the blue would have behaved just as the red did. Ha yes, gravitation in the absence of mass is the new conundrum of modern physics. {LIVE Science; Forums, History and Culture; Culture History & Science; What is a living individual and is it naturally universally mobile?}
Would the gravitation over such a small distance be huge ?
Sean doesn't even follow physics. 1LofT states that energy can't be created or destroyed, it can't happen naturally. One aspect of the 2LofT shows that the universe is winding down, usable energy is becoming less usable. Creation had to be done supernaturally at some point.
Math, like numbers, is a language humans invented to describe relationships more usefully than words. It chokes me when people talk about math like it's something discovered that was used by god(s) to create our universe (if it is a universe).
This guy is a fantastic speaker.
Multiple Universities.. the crazy shit these physicists come up with. :)
Liam Cockcroft funniest typo 🤣
@@JoeGelman The intro lady miss spoke and said it, it cracked me up :)
DCLS , there is a very simple channel wide flag to flush comments with links as they are submitted - switching it on avoids a lot of crap spam comments , so please consider this service to your viewers