Secrets of the Universe: Neil Turok Public Lecture

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 539

  • @justaguy6100
    @justaguy6100 Рік тому +322

    I spend too much emotional capital listening to the problems of our political landscape. I come to these videos of lectures given by rational, intelligent, intellectually curious people to remind myself that they, and I hope I can say we, still exist. I hope there are enough of us engaged enough to turn the tide of the irrational mobs that will, if they can manage to do so, overrun virtually every intellectual pursuit left to humanity.

    • @marktimothy2380
      @marktimothy2380 Рік тому +22

      What a beautiful post.
      Thank you 🙏

    • @egay86292
      @egay86292 11 місяців тому +9

      you're an emotional capitalist? nice!

    • @justaguy6100
      @justaguy6100 11 місяців тому +1

      Very little return on that, of late@@egay86292

    • @sevengrapes1257
      @sevengrapes1257 11 місяців тому +5

      Lovely!

    • @ej2796
      @ej2796 11 місяців тому +9

      Agreed. I'm glad to see Neil Turok again. I love his lectures.

  • @draxiedru
    @draxiedru Рік тому +45

    Besides his obvious profound intelligence and curiosity I find Prof Turok to be equally humble and human. So many of the world’s other notable theorists are just so inaccessible and seem insulted when their theories are challenged.

  • @timveseli
    @timveseli Рік тому +86

    Unbelievable that you can listen to some of the greatest minds in our time. Turok is brilliant.

    • @mitseraffej5812
      @mitseraffej5812 Рік тому +10

      Yes, with all that is available via the Internet there really is no excuse for the unabashed ignorance that pervades some Western societies.

    • @-Lotek-The-B0T-ASSASS1N
      @-Lotek-The-B0T-ASSASS1N Рік тому +2

      @@mitseraffej5812 I live in the Southern United States, i know precisely what you mean unfortunately. The silver lining in the situation is that the most ignorant tend to be the loudest, whilst the rest of us are just scratching our heads. Critical Thinking 101 should be a mandatory class in high school. Unfortunately the powers that be really love the uneducated. Gee i wonder who i could be talking about...

    • @mattblack6736
      @mattblack6736 Рік тому +2

      I quite liked Turok 2 on N64, great game!

    • @silent00planet
      @silent00planet Рік тому

      nonsense science is not near to answering the big questions there is no progress just speculation you might as well ask a sci-fi writer

    • @v05555
      @v05555 3 дні тому

      @@mitseraffej5812Try to be more positive, life is too short to be negative.

  • @mikaelbiilmann6826
    @mikaelbiilmann6826 11 місяців тому +15

    Love these videos. A lot I still don't understand, but whenever a little piece falls into place, I am so happy.

  • @philiprice6961
    @philiprice6961 Рік тому +63

    Whether or not Turok is on to something this was a masterclass in presentation and exposition. The students at Edinburgh are so lucky!

    • @deepdusto
      @deepdusto Рік тому +1

      I felt the same, it is immaculate, an example of how to present information. A question though, new to this: for e.g. 11:18s the Cosmic wave background spectrum, Boltzmann curve x-axis is depicted with frequency, whereas the normal (and yet identical curve I find) show x-axis in wavelength. How could the 2 curves be identical when wavelength is the inverse (opposite) of frequency?

    • @ralphstuurman1468
      @ralphstuurman1468 11 місяців тому +1

      Great presentation.Thank you Prof Turok

    • @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546
      @thedouglasw.lippchannel5546 9 місяців тому +1

      try learning CIG Theory

    • @randallrutherford1384
      @randallrutherford1384 6 місяців тому

      Turok!

    • @robertrcenger
      @robertrcenger 6 місяців тому

      M​@@ralphstuurman1468

  • @Barnaclebeard
    @Barnaclebeard 8 місяців тому +8

    This tab has been sitting in by browser for 4 months, I'm glad I finally watched it. I cannot tell you how relieved I am to learn that Turok finally has cosmology under control.

  • @itzybitzyspyder
    @itzybitzyspyder Рік тому +28

    I wish I could have caught this live. I'm just a lowly butcher, but science is my first and truest love.

    • @Tagurrit
      @Tagurrit 10 місяців тому +7

      Why is being a butcher lowly? My grandfather was a butcher and he was among the brightest men I’ve known! Besides we all have to eat! Your job is important!!! ❤❤❤

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 8 місяців тому

      *Whose* science *of_ what*? Why the Uriah Heep act?

    • @theostapel
      @theostapel 6 місяців тому +1

      What about knives ? Fare thee well.

    • @theostapel
      @theostapel 6 місяців тому +1

      Me Indian meditation teacher said this: 'Why not ? A butcher can be a saint.'
      Fare thee well.

    • @profkingthing
      @profkingthing 6 місяців тому +1

      I am also a layman, and I share in your privilege. It is beyond cool to live in a time when this kind of science is made accessible to us.

  • @danielpaulson8838
    @danielpaulson8838 Рік тому +32

    Mind blown. Thank you for making this available for us. What a wonderful opportunity to have access to the worlds greatest thinkers and researchers.
    Somehow I feel as if we step back far enough, we would see our life emergent from the flotsam of increasingly complex energy waves. Life is freaking amazing.

    • @simonsmedley5434
      @simonsmedley5434 Рік тому

      Calm down Dear!

    • @danielpaulson8838
      @danielpaulson8838 Рік тому +1

      @@simonsmedley5434 Only when lethargy for life experience sets in. I may not get there.

  • @ShannonSp-wn5qk
    @ShannonSp-wn5qk 4 місяці тому +1

    Thank you for having me I enjoy being here with all of y'all today and I believe it will be the Big show for everyone very soon we will see what life can really be

  • @evo1ov3
    @evo1ov3 Рік тому +11

    "It would be called Enlightenment." Nice! Distinctly fitting summarization & clear conjunction to the acutely mind-blowing cliffhanger of a lecture. Mr. Turok gave with the Simplicity of Everything at PI in 2015 as Director.

  • @Stadtpark90
    @Stadtpark90 Рік тому +13

    4:53 talk starts here
    Edit: Could have needed bookmarks to jump to the new stuff (edit: note to self: jump to 41:26 ; the real bomb gets dropped 57:56). Pretty slow start; even a bit tedious to watch the beginning.
    19:30 our model of the universe: Lambda CDM
    22:02 promises minimal theory: starts talking about critical behavior and phase transitions; (foreshadowing)
    28:09 promises easy solution to the Big Bang; (more foreshadowing)
    34:00 smallest and biggest lengths you could even theoretically ever see: introducing Planck Length and Lambda Horizon; (at Planck Length a photon of that wavelength would form a Black Hole, so light can not escape; at Lambda Horizon distance, space expands faster than c, so that this light can never reach us)
    38:13 “These are all the laws we know.” - reiterating that maybe there are no more “new particles” (- even more foreshadowing)
    39:27 The Standard Model (insert usual picture)
    40:31 Three Generations of Particles, but why? (- more foreshadowing)
    About time we came to the good stuff (- the things I hadn’t heard before)
    41:26 right handed Neutrinos (Seesaw mechanism) as good candidate for Dark Matter
    43:18 predicting the cosmic abundance of right handed neutrinos via CPT-symmetry; the Big Bang as a mirror
    46:29 so: what if right handed Neutrinos are Dark Matter? A stable and heavy right handed Neutrino would imply the lightest normal, left handed Neutrino to be massless! There are measurements underway to constrain the mass of the Neutrino.
    48:32 nice side effect: Penrose gets his “conformal Big Bang”
    51:47 claim / argument for why the cosmos is as it is: entropic reasoning
    57:56 “NO ADDITIONAL SMOOTHING OR FLATTENING MECHANISM IS REQUIRED.”
    Turok pulling a UNO Reverse on the Inflationists. A true Laplace-vs-Napoleon-move: ”I had no need for this hypothesis, Sire.” 😂 Mic-Drop-Moment
    59:01 the problem of mm-scale-gravitational-wave-detectors
    1:00:38 The origin of the three generations and structure formation: introducing 36 zero-dimensional-fields to get rid of infinite vacuum energy
    On second viewing: this seems a little light on the details…
    P.S.: You plug in a measurement from Particle Physics / The LHC into your formula and receive a value that equals a measurement from Cosmology / The Planck CMB satellite to almost two decimal points. - How does that tell me anything about how you chose your formula? Maybe you chose it in a way that it fits? You introduced 36 new constants of nature for this?? How is that progress? How is this the end of the talk?? This should be the beginning of a talk! Does this count as an explanation? - You could have produced a rabbit from a hat like that, for all I know! Are you sure you didn’t just put in the rabbit in the first place? Forget all the hand movements and the name dropping: what exactly did you do? I just have to admit that I did not understand a thing.

  • @dm4859
    @dm4859 Рік тому +8

    A privilege to sit in on this lecture from home. Thank you.

  • @msm1723
    @msm1723 Рік тому +6

    This is what we all being waiting for since The Astonishing Simplicity!

  • @semmering1
    @semmering1 Рік тому +10

    I trully love such smart and clever people - thank you for bringing this excellent talk in UA-cam to us.

  • @johnsiman5063
    @johnsiman5063 Рік тому +33

    Turok: “It tells us its secrets.” Recall Shakespeare’s lines: “And this our life, exempt from public haunt, finds tongues in trees, books in the running brooks, sermons in stones, and good in everything.”

    • @jestermoon
      @jestermoon Рік тому +3

      Amen 🙏
      No gods required or seen in my foxhole for 40 years. 36:35
      I love you sir. 36:58 🎉
      37:05 ❤❤
      WOW?
      37:30
      37:39
      LAMDA
      37:52
      genius at play 38:17 🎉

    • @stevenpahoulis4649
      @stevenpahoulis4649 Рік тому

      20:07 20:14 20:15 20:15 20:18

    • @ShonMardani
      @ShonMardani Рік тому

      In the formula F=ma, a has a time variable which means F = 0 when time = 0 and Force can not be calculated unless you provide time duration. The parameter a Acceleration is due to the Gravity and Gravity has a set vector / direction, 0 to 180 degree, in other words there is NO Acceleration if there is NO Gravity, and in Gravity direction and Time needed. Force is 0 (zero) unless you give a non zero time.This is what scientists have been hiding and the space time scam is to explain a flawed formula using the gang leader einstein. E=mc2 is also False since you can change the constant 2 to 3 or any other number, it has no effect because E has no Unit. Also all the formulas mentioned as the successor to E=mc2, has the Time variable with the value 0 (zero) which makes all the calculated Forces, Energies and Vectors Zero. Additionally einstein never wrote and published any of these formulas and no other scientist wanted to claim Fallacy.

    • @spiralsun1
      @spiralsun1 9 місяців тому +1

      Shakespeare should have said books in trees and tongues in running brooks. He was incorrect. Thanks for the quote.

    • @vhawk1951kl
      @vhawk1951kl 8 місяців тому +1

      To-morrow, and to-morrow, and to-morrow,
      Creeps in this petty pace from day to day,
      To the last syllable of recorded time;
      And all our yesterdays have lighted fools
      The way to dusty death. Out, out, brief candle!
      Life's but a walking shadow, a poor player,
      That struts and frets his hour upon the stage,
      And then is heard no more. It is a tale
      Told by an idiot, full of sound and fury,
      Signifying *Nothing*. Also courtesy of that esoteric school that hid behind the name Shakespeare.

  • @Psychx_
    @Psychx_ 11 місяців тому +3

    Finally another public lecture. I've been missing those a lot! And then it's even with Neil the legend Turok himself :D

  • @whtfsh765
    @whtfsh765 Рік тому +8

    As always Neil Turok provided a very informative talk. My only criticism is that the shots of the audience during the talk were rather distracting.

  • @aclearlight
    @aclearlight Рік тому +26

    A truly wonderful exposition. So profound yet also very accessible. It takes a true master to make it look this easy. 🖖🌠🌈🛸🦄

  • @DavidGiragosian
    @DavidGiragosian Місяць тому

    I hope I live long enough for part 3 of Dr. Turok’s PI lecture series.

  • @whirledpeas3477
    @whirledpeas3477 Рік тому +13

    My main man Neil never disappoints ❤

  • @ThomAnno
    @ThomAnno Рік тому +2

    Always a fenomenaal lecture. Good to know born South Africans are doing well in the USA. Dearest Regards, From South Africa.

    • @theostapel
      @theostapel 6 місяців тому +1

      Yet - firstly - human being - like all of us. Muddling through - with this meaning - nay, truth quest.
      Also from SA - now in Germany and imbibing spirituality - from Indian meditation. Hee hee.
      Fare thee well.

  • @markduch7433
    @markduch7433 5 годин тому

    By far the best Q&A in the history of Q&As! God is light, the One who sees everything, everywhere, all at once. And he loves you enough to bring the universe straight to your retinas. May we let his light shine deep into our hearts and find that it is love.

  • @thomasparisi5333
    @thomasparisi5333 Рік тому +8

    Live long and prosper Turok 🖖

  • @constpegasus
    @constpegasus Рік тому +11

    The best lecture yet🎉

  • @annier6835
    @annier6835 Рік тому +3

    I tried, but felt I could not grasp most of this lecture. I watched it again and felt utterly stupid. So glad there are people like Turok to do my thinking for me! I forgive him for making me feel so mentally inadequate. ❤

    • @ronhudson3730
      @ronhudson3730 Рік тому +1

      Here's another takeaway... maybe the lecture was written for a selective audience and not for the average, interested layperson. I conceptually understood most of it, but none of the mathematics and I still fell asleep halfway through. The most interesting part was the very last question - which was answered basically with a "we don't know".

    • @jackdrasmussen5849
      @jackdrasmussen5849 11 місяців тому +1

      Hi, Do not feel intimated by these lectures. Give your self credit for sitting through this. If this lecture re sparked wonder and curiosity like you had as a child, That is a good thing!

  • @jimgraham6722
    @jimgraham6722 Рік тому +8

    Canada does this type of stuff very well. Its very well done.

    • @d_wigglesworth
      @d_wigglesworth Рік тому

      This is partially thanks to the fleeting success of the Blackberry. Watch the movie: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BlackBerry_(film)

  • @warrenmanning7991
    @warrenmanning7991 Рік тому +2

    I was watching this during the Rugby World Cup Final to calm my nerves.. We won Prof Turok! 🇿🇦

    • @mitseraffej5812
      @mitseraffej5812 Рік тому +3

      And from NZ, we lost. There could not have been a more worthy opponent.

    • @warrenmanning7991
      @warrenmanning7991 Рік тому +1

      @@mitseraffej5812 #Respect

    • @theostapel
      @theostapel 6 місяців тому

      @@mitseraffej5812 As long as sport wins - with ethics and joy and exercise done.
      Fare thee well.

  • @deadvatniks
    @deadvatniks Рік тому +4

    I waited new Neil Turok video for like a four month and I smashed that link 20 seconds after it became available. Since I heard it first I trust Neil approach much more than I trust string-theory-multiverse-inflation bad infinity. I believe Astonishing Simplicity is actually the way.

  • @gregkeet
    @gregkeet Рік тому +10

    I love this conversation. I would love to understand how long cycle gravitational waves can be explained within this theory. In my perception. I always figured it never become as a singularity and that the wavelength of light stretched over time, creating the red shifts and make galaxies appear to be travelling away when they weren't. It's been a long journey of trying to figure it all out.

  • @Cat_Woods
    @Cat_Woods Рік тому +13

    I get that it seems simple to Neil, but honestly, even the stuff I thought I understood ok, when he explains it, I realize, wow, I REALLY don't understand this. No shade. I just think he understands these things at a level I'm nowhere near.
    (...going to replay it a bunch more times to see if I can get it a bit more)

    • @danielpaulson8838
      @danielpaulson8838 10 місяців тому

      Listening to this repeatedly is the right thing to do. I used to work with a guy who could repeat sitcom lines because he watched them repeatedly. We CAN pick how we wire our brains. Even if we don’t start out in life knowing that. What happens to FAUX viewers. They become what they consume.

  • @GeneralSulla
    @GeneralSulla Рік тому +3

    It's almost like Turok has explained a reduction in soup into its constituent parts that makes the whole dish possible and tasty. No need for magical cooks. Just the ingredients. I like that concoction much better than the fanciful explanations of imaginative, clever theorists. Just a great soup recipe that makes sense. Now the last question was about the cook in a roundabout way. Why did it all happen? I say, why not?

  • @para.llaxed
    @para.llaxed 10 місяців тому +1

    I have been waiting so long for this. Thanks Neil and PI. ⭐

  • @JimKrause1975
    @JimKrause1975 Місяць тому

    I may have to watch this a few times to try to comprehend it all better. I love it! So fascinating! I love learning about the cosmos!

  • @danielpaulson8838
    @danielpaulson8838 10 місяців тому

    Learning about reality makes my heart soar.

  • @TheMikesylv
    @TheMikesylv Рік тому +5

    He is definitely on to something, I have always asked why everything looks the same a egg in a pan a hurricane a solar system a galaxy a tornado the pedals on a flower the spiral of shells and so on it says the geometry is simple at the core. Wolfgram said that very simple rules can lead to complex systems.

  • @zeroonetime
    @zeroonetime Рік тому

    Neil Turok I.S. (Infinity Squared) right on "The astonishing simplicity of Everything".
    Neil Turok, you have shattered the human perception of cosmic ceilings.

  • @akpanekpo6025
    @akpanekpo6025 11 місяців тому +3

    Can someone explain to me why I'm addicted to listening to these geniuses even though I haven't the faintest clue what they're talking about?

  • @joqqy8497
    @joqqy8497 Рік тому +6

    Neil has a sane look at science, physics and the cosmos.
    I am tired of hearing about string theory, multiverses, bubble universes and infinite inflation.

  • @CASHSEC
    @CASHSEC Рік тому

    Definition of Theoretical Physics. A continual guesssing game of how things are,tested, accepted or rejected,including many fudge factors to make the maths work. Though not being able to understand most of Professor Turocks I really appreciate that throughout his talk it is punctuated with "maybe" or is "just theory".

  • @stafford-u7w
    @stafford-u7w Рік тому +3

    According to the supercomputer Deep Thought the answer to the question of life, the universe and everything was 42 (in Douglas Adam's Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy). At 1.05.12 Neil says the critical exponent from Cern and extrapolated becomes 42!

  • @Jainhospitals
    @Jainhospitals 11 місяців тому

    simply beautiful, elegant presentation

  • @ashleyobrien4937
    @ashleyobrien4937 Рік тому +1

    Enlightenment indeed ! I am going to study this further, I really think he's cracked it...

  • @Jar.in.a.Bottle
    @Jar.in.a.Bottle 9 місяців тому

    Top notch, thank you Neil and PI. Now to ponder and chew over what I've learned over some snacks. Good science and snacks, a cosmic must!

  • @lynxissiodorensis2319
    @lynxissiodorensis2319 Рік тому +4

    Very interesting ideas. Thanks for the lecture.

  • @mrmcphilsconfidential8562
    @mrmcphilsconfidential8562 Рік тому +2

    Most powerful application of cancellation I've ever seen. He gave us permission to remove the Nutrino L's!

  • @ALavin-en1kr
    @ALavin-en1kr 8 місяців тому +1

    It is likely the whole cosmos is set up to be immune to human interference or stupidity. A good thing.

  • @visionaryus
    @visionaryus 3 місяці тому

    Neil is awesome, he goes that extra step to explain, that a lot of people in other videos don't. Like for example the CMB, people usually show the image and say this is the cosmic wave background and thats it. That image by itself doesn't mean anything to me but he explains the data and what the data means.

  •  10 місяців тому +1

    "Maybe we have time for one more quick question. Is it a quick question?" - "Yes. […long monologue…] What is existence?"

  • @Nomad77ca
    @Nomad77ca Рік тому +14

    Just Wow. Thanks Neil, amazing ideas. Wondering if this theory has a name yet? Also, just a guess, you mentions a relation ship between having 36 dim0 fields and the 2 groups of 6 particles, seems like those fields might give the particles their 3 dimensions, or something to that effect.

    • @ashleyobrien4937
      @ashleyobrien4937 Рік тому

      yeah, but more like two groups of two, because each group has two extra that are heavier, e

    • @susanochs1927
      @susanochs1927 Рік тому

      z

    • @123Ghengis
      @123Ghengis Рік тому +1

      His model has a taurus in it. The "Turok Taurus Theory"... or "T^3" ... ?

  • @missh1774
    @missh1774 Рік тому +2

    Thank you Neil. Very cool 💛 41:10 is the generation puzzle about the bi-direction spiral of the sphere? 44:03 Each human is born with a piece of that copy. Every culture and interpretation of their copy is so important to balance with how we govern and treat each other. 1:02:32 Isn't this why we have a reciprocal relationship with the moon?

  • @nowhereman8374
    @nowhereman8374 Рік тому

    Kudos, thank you Neil and thank you Perimeter

  • @kevindarter822
    @kevindarter822 Рік тому +1

    37:10 Love this talk. Just wanted to add that the Higgs boson can not be seen directly, but only inferred from its decay products.

  • @PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm
    @PlanetXMysteries-pj9nm Рік тому

    Science and the universe are something too sublime for me. Thank you for letting ignorant people like me see more of the universe. I really like this channel

  • @theostapel
    @theostapel 6 місяців тому

    Here is hoping - that other thinkers and viewers - grant enough space - for Prof Turok - to continue his original thinking.
    To bring clarity - in his way - to the thought - in physics research.
    In simplicity - it is quietly apparent - that essence is realised. ( Hint from Raja yoga meditation)
    Fare thee well.

  • @Benedicte1ful
    @Benedicte1ful 10 місяців тому +1

    its interesting that ancient Egypt has a story about creation and where “light sees its own shadow.”

  • @WilliamMartinez-vq2bn
    @WilliamMartinez-vq2bn 3 місяці тому

    Absolutely wonderful lecture.

  • @vagnersantos2048
    @vagnersantos2048 Рік тому

    I admire so much whoever understands 10% of this presentation

  • @kevindarter822
    @kevindarter822 Рік тому +1

    The Higgs boson can decay into various combinations of particles, depending on its mass and the probabilities of each decay mode. Some of the most common decay modes are:
    Two photons (H → γγ)
    Two W bosons (H → WW)
    Two Z bosons (H → ZZ)
    Two bottom quarks (H → bb)

    • @Ekam-Sat
      @Ekam-Sat 11 місяців тому

      Who knows, maybe there is no decay in the absolute sense.

    • @carparkmartian2193
      @carparkmartian2193 10 місяців тому

      The useful information here is that the emitted particles emitted are paired with antiparticles. Though your antiparticleschave not been identified.

  • @modallas8034
    @modallas8034 Рік тому +1

    Excellent!!!
    This man is way too smart. 😮

  • @JM-sv5ix
    @JM-sv5ix 7 місяців тому +1

    If you want quick review... 12:29 and 1:04:28

  • @FractalWoman
    @FractalWoman Рік тому +1

    I think there is a typo at the 46:35 mark. Planck mass is 5 x 10^-8 kg (the minus is missing from the 8).

    • @andymccracken4046
      @andymccracken4046 10 місяців тому

      He was saying 5x10^8 proton masses - as in half a billion - which I think means these neutrinos are less than a thousandth of the Planck mass.

    • @FractalWoman
      @FractalWoman 9 місяців тому +1

      @@andymccracken4046 You are right. I thought he was talking about Planck mass here which is 5xe-8. My bad.

  • @johnkean6852
    @johnkean6852 Рік тому +1

    "Look at the large chunk of data - see what fits - [our narrative, and YOU] learn from that!"

  • @montevideofoodie2527
    @montevideofoodie2527 Рік тому +1

    uau one lecture practically explains every cosmological and quantum mystery there is...

  • @kevindarter822
    @kevindarter822 Рік тому +1

    37:10 Only through Indirect detection, which means that the Higgs boson is not observed as a single particle, but as a combination of other particles that result from its decay.

  • @Jacobk-g7r
    @Jacobk-g7r Рік тому

    Each individual water drop in the body pushes and transfers the energy while changing itself. Like 1 hitting 2 and it transfers energy and not only moves in direction but moves in an evolution. It’s more apparent in macro things because we see it easier. The cascade is why it’s so fast but seems so slow now. We can see the patterns because we are those pieces in a form/pattern. We are grown in real time because of the cascade and patterns of growths in the brain. Cells being grown from the input of reality through the senses in a pattern that connects to the other senses patterns like touch or smell combining. The patterns are consistent and are seen in math, geography, and in life itself as well as the spirals in the universe. It’s kinda weird to think about if you think it’s weird so don’t think it’s weird and try to understand before sending hateful comments. Thank you. We grow in tandem with reality just as our cells and us grow and not just grow as in make bigger but shift in form like a butterfly, superpositioning.

  • @allanm9913
    @allanm9913 4 місяці тому

    Thanks! 1.5 hrs free of the mundane.

  • @helderalmeida2790
    @helderalmeida2790 Рік тому +1

    I really enjoyed his apresentation.

  • @Chris.Davies
    @Chris.Davies 11 місяців тому

    I am rather more attracted to the idea of dark matter simply being nanometre dust particles, and dark plasma in the form of hydrogen ions. We live in a plasma universe, and Occam and Newton agree we shouldn't introduce anything new without just cause. If space is has a lot of dust particles of just a few atom or two in size, then high energy photons could hit them directly raising their temperature to thousands of degrees, which - added together would explain what we call the CMB.
    Then there is the issue of redshift - which we do not fully understand, and it seems likely there is at least one unknown factor which causes light to lose energy over distance. And if that is true, then dark Energy will simply disappear in a puff of inevitable logic.
    For, just as LaPlace said to Napoleon, "Sire, I had no need of that hypothesis."

  • @LuciFeric137
    @LuciFeric137 Рік тому +1

    Love Dr. Turok

  • @lanceburris7850
    @lanceburris7850 7 місяців тому

    I am a writer and artist who happens to have a basic education in mathematics, physics, and the history of science. I am not an academic or professional mathematician or physicist. As an artist I have found the current scientific consensus suspect because it is based upon the wrong frame of reference which has led to the misinterpretation of the observational evidence. Unless you truly understand the mechanics of perception, you have no idea what you are looking at. In 1976 I had an epiphany in which I saw the other half of the universe. I began writing books of metaphysical philosophy and developed what I call the Apollonian System which introduces a new coordinate system, new paradigm for time, space, and light, and a new visual vocabulary enabling one to conceptualize a four-dimensional, conscious universe governed by the principles of four-dimensional geometry and the mathematics of the infinite. There are no natural laws, only a conscious singularity and mathematics. There was no Big Bang, and there are no material particles. The Standard Model of Particle Physics is the modern equivalent of counting angels on pinheads since particles are the product of our perceptual limitations. We digitize the perceptual world.
    Since I am an individual and not part of the academic establishment, I can get no one in the academic community to talk to me. Therefore, I propose to go directly to the public using the indirection of art. I am now in the process of completing a major painting exhibition which allows the viewer to experience an alternative to our culture's current scientific model of reality. Perhaps Professor Turok should read my book titled "Apollonian Coordinate System, the Mechanics of Perception from a Fourth-Dimensional Perspective. Toward a Deductive Metaphysical Science of Conscious Being" which is available on Amazon. It takes a radically different approach to understanding the universe and our place within it if we are to escape from the safe space of the scientific consensus. My metaphysics overturns much of the current scientific consensus by freeing science from the materialist philosophy imposed in the seventeenth century by the Scientific Method. The astronomers studying the images sent by the JWST have no idea what they are looking at. Lance Burris.

  • @douglascampbell66
    @douglascampbell66 Рік тому +1

    "Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over rocks from the basement of time. On some of those rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs." Norman MacLean from A River Runs Through It.

  • @ChimbzZ
    @ChimbzZ 7 місяців тому

    Physics eases my mind from the chaos that is life

  • @spacepygmy4443
    @spacepygmy4443 11 місяців тому

    Neil turok is the man 🎖️

  • @bsmith577
    @bsmith577 6 місяців тому

    This point was not the start of the big bang but the expansion of the universe by mass equalling gravity of space and with centrifugal force expands.

  • @DuaneCowell
    @DuaneCowell 11 місяців тому

    Thankyou for your video at last

  • @BarisSenturk-nd3il
    @BarisSenturk-nd3il Рік тому

    I'm loving with you Neil, you're amazing human being.

  • @davidwilkie9551
    @davidwilkie9551 Рік тому

    The question about how we observe the BBT is "bang on" Relativity of 1-0-infinity wave-particle coordination-identification positioning.., holography.

  • @fanaticforager6610
    @fanaticforager6610 10 місяців тому +1

    11:18 Speaking of ‘Probability’, what is the chance of 🌥️ a school boy finding a common denominator between a heliotrope & 🌏ur Galactic Orbit .⁉️

  • @craigswanson8026
    @craigswanson8026 10 місяців тому +1

    Funny: someone went to a lot of trouble to intentionally name the place PI only to have folks “shorten” it to the four syllable perimeter.

  • @TiagoCavalcanti-ji6hu
    @TiagoCavalcanti-ji6hu Рік тому

    Breaking the breaking of symmetry shouldn`t have been seen as so far-fetched. So, the Universe cannot tell left from right in the end, huh. Or in the beginning. The way he sold it (virtually flawlessly) made it sound like it solves more problems than it causes from the get-go. Quite a feat already. Cheers!

  • @brianelliott4923
    @brianelliott4923 5 місяців тому

    Turok is just brilliant.

  • @quranjadeed
    @quranjadeed 18 днів тому

    This man can talk for an inverse Planck length amount of time and you would not tire.

  • @swigwerks
    @swigwerks 6 місяців тому +1

    Anybody other Hitchhiker's Guide to the Universe pick up on the fact that the number 42 is apparently easter-egged prominently as this man answers the question of the Universe? I mean, I guess it was 42/100 but I grade on a curve 😂

  • @sanketpatel4548
    @sanketpatel4548 Рік тому +1

    It's truly unbelievable that he took leave between his lecture series to fly to perimeter to give this amazing talk,
    I will ask him my doubts when he will return to continue his lecture on Monday.

  • @someoneinmyhead
    @someoneinmyhead 8 місяців тому

    Brilliant talk

  • @mikecope806
    @mikecope806 Рік тому +1

    Turok, you rock!

  • @DavidBauer-iv9yw
    @DavidBauer-iv9yw 11 місяців тому

    Spirituality
    is when you connect to the other side
    then your side will be a little bit brighter

  • @ovidiulupu5575
    @ovidiulupu5575 Рік тому +1

    Beautiful.

  • @dylanmenzies3973
    @dylanmenzies3973 Рік тому +1

    Also props to the canadian audience for being cool.

  • @orsozapata
    @orsozapata Рік тому +1

    People sleeping in the audience when many would pay to follow these lectures

  • @bretnetherton9273
    @bretnetherton9273 Рік тому +1

    Awareness is the only constant of all experience what could be more fundamental to reality than that? Awareness is known by awareness alone.

    • @ronaldronald8819
      @ronaldronald8819 Рік тому +1

      Talking about mysteries. Awareness like the Universe are. I think it is beautiful that we can marvel about mysteries.
      Is A.I heading for awareness ? ? Could you argue: Awareness is an attribute of the Universe and therefore that the Universe is self-aware ?

  • @mikefisher5005
    @mikefisher5005 Рік тому +1

    Neil starts about 4:20

  • @JustNow42
    @JustNow42 7 місяців тому

    It seems actually very reasonable that there are gravity that attract mass and a force that disperse mass in analogi with electric fields. So there may be a connection between these ? Gravity is compressed space where time goes slower and dark energy is diluted space where time goes faster. Now we just need an equation and a Nobel price

  • @8cccpeevostokzempf
    @8cccpeevostokzempf Рік тому

    The last gentlemen's question seems to hover around Lawrence Krauss's answer to why is there something rather than nothing which he argues (if I understand corredtly) because "Nothing" is unstamble. "Nothing" being otherwise totally empty packets of Planck-level space which are linfinitesmally energized. Further inquisition leads to speculation with regard to First Causes which Krauss argues converts physics to an environmental science.

  • @AmitAmit-sk9yr
    @AmitAmit-sk9yr 11 місяців тому

    I am so glad that finally the scientist group understood the birth of universe hidden in plain sight , now my relatives would belive me. I am showing this video...the universe would finally condense into a Neutron star.wow

  • @alphaomega1089
    @alphaomega1089 5 місяців тому

    I like how he emphasises theorists are clueless about reality in their theories. Just like AE needed someone to prove it.

  • @r3drum3k92
    @r3drum3k92 10 місяців тому

    Cosmology is under control. 💪🙌

  • @richardleetbluesharmonicac7192
    @richardleetbluesharmonicac7192 11 місяців тому +1

    I can run circles scientifically around Roger, Penrose, and I challenge any Cosmologist to a debate.

  • @alienfields959
    @alienfields959 8 місяців тому

    Neil has it figured out!

  • @michaelcox1071
    @michaelcox1071 Рік тому +1

    Starts at 4:25