it has better AA than other Airborne decks and lots of light vehicles, a few units in it are oddly priced, but as a full package its pretty solid already.
@@crumpetcommandos779 sure, every deck needs its weak spots. woeisme who is rank 1 and berthags who is a league runners up, both had good success and rate it quite highly. I think it needs its own playstyle, but its better than Hippie and co try to make it.
Remember the time anyone used a T-62 in Wargame Red Dragon? Yeah, me neither Warno's deckbuilding has it's pros: after a time, all RD decks became a unicorn shitfest where the average T-72 was relegated to deck filler in the best of cases
Always on point on the divs analysis! very nice vid!
Glad you like them!
@@sd_leaguehands down best Warno UA-camr
I hope after this the developers will have the sense to make a sensible division in the next Nemesis, like the US Marines and Morskaya.
Fought the 4E Divise with my 9th Panzer. Didn't end well for my T-72s^^
I like how 100mm AA guns have 2300 at planes and 35mm oerlicons have 3000
Many other factors determine range not just caliber.
May have something to do with the fact that the latter has search radar and radar slaving while the former is aimed strictly by Mk.1 Eyeball
@@lelmone6856even the stationary 35mm gun? Not the gepards?
400 NEW UNITS!!!
*Most of them are just reskin of old divs 😂
Multinational seems more of a gimmicky deck than the other airborne decks. I hope it gets a buff to make it more viable
it has better AA than other Airborne decks and lots of light vehicles, a few units in it are oddly priced, but as a full package its pretty solid already.
@@sd_leagueno long range asf or anti inf helo though:(
@@crumpetcommandos779 sure, every deck needs its weak spots.
woeisme who is rank 1 and berthags who is a league runners up, both had good success and rate it quite highly.
I think it needs its own playstyle, but its better than Hippie and co try to make it.
@@sd_league hippie is a bit of a UK suffers nihilist lol, price adjustments need to happen for sure though
Remember in wargame, where you didn't need to pay for custom divisions?
RDs lax deckbuilding also had its issues. Its DLCs were atleast on a new unit to USD ratio not widely different to WARNOs either so :shrug:
Remember the time anyone used a T-62 in Wargame Red Dragon? Yeah, me neither
Warno's deckbuilding has it's pros: after a time, all RD decks became a unicorn shitfest where the average T-72 was relegated to deck filler in the best of cases