Indian Union Debate 2015 - Should Article 370 be abolished?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 гру 2015
  • To watch this and many more videos, click on www.newslaundry.com/
    Watch three lawyers, academics and politicians on either side battle out this long-standing debate.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @sunil-zo1vf
    @sunil-zo1vf 4 роки тому +196

    who is watching this after the decision of abolishing the article :P

  • @pulkitkhedwal
    @pulkitkhedwal 3 роки тому +36

    And in the end after years, Swamy ji proved he was right and won the bet ✔️

  • @AmitPandeyzenithamit
    @AmitPandeyzenithamit 4 роки тому +215

    Who is here after the proposal of J&K reorganisation by Amit Shah?

    • @kalyanaram4787
      @kalyanaram4787 4 роки тому +5

      thats nothing so special about it. The UA-cam algorithm recommends according to the search kewywords. Simple

    • @AmitPandeyzenithamit
      @AmitPandeyzenithamit 4 роки тому +3

      @@kalyanaram4787 Whatever.....I particularly searched this video as I have seen it before.

    • @Sami-rp7mf
      @Sami-rp7mf 4 роки тому +1

      Excellent. He does what he says.

    • @theseeker7194
      @theseeker7194 4 роки тому +2

      Was the book "50 shades of grey" written after 2015 ?

    • @RahulKumar-ng2gh
      @RahulKumar-ng2gh 4 роки тому +1

      @@AmitPandeyzenithamit me too brother

  • @cariayappa
    @cariayappa 4 роки тому +60

    Mysore was the 1st princely state to volunteer joined India 🇮🇳

    • @theseeker7194
      @theseeker7194 4 роки тому +1

      We all are very very thankful to them for standing in support of the vision of ONE INDIA

    • @hhanumantharaya
      @hhanumantharaya 3 роки тому +3

      Mysore kings are most respected and beloved kings in the worls

    • @manojkemp
      @manojkemp 3 роки тому +3

      Wodeyar Family will always be in our heart. We kannadigas and whole nation will always be under Wodeyar's debt.

    • @OhiSandhu
      @OhiSandhu 3 роки тому

      @@hhanumantharaya if they will protest for something these days...they will be the biggest culprits in one or two days...nd whole media n IT cell will start working to defame them

  • @chandramohanvathyam1648
    @chandramohanvathyam1648 8 років тому +261

    Good civil debate unlike what we see on English News TV channels. Find this debate is organized on the lines of Intelligence Squared debates. Hopefully subjects of debates in future also touch more controversial subjects also as Intelligence squared does. Audio needs to be improved. The answers by Abhshek and Siddarth I could hardly make out. Very good beginning and hope good to come.

    • @deka0014
      @deka0014 8 років тому +1

      +Chandra Mohan Vathyam You watch IQ2 as well. cool!

    • @pscpanchayat1307
      @pscpanchayat1307 8 років тому

      He is not the member of parliament INDo

    • @SiddharthJaiswal2003
      @SiddharthJaiswal2003 5 років тому

      It is context that State legislators ask President to review the article and Deem it appropriate.

    • @SiddharthJaiswal2003
      @SiddharthJaiswal2003 5 років тому

      It can be done similarly When President added article 35, with similar process modification can be done. Which part did you not understand?

    • @Hanslun122
      @Hanslun122 4 роки тому

      Yes. It was refreshing. Even the personal jibes are more civil than the times we live in.

  • @vishalprajapati901
    @vishalprajapati901 4 роки тому +20

    I can watch 100 debates like this tirelessly.
    Great debate...

  • @anan7b66
    @anan7b66 8 років тому +277

    I hope Mr Swamy stays in good health for a long time. We need him around. I'm quite disappointed with Mr Jethmalani. The way he is putting Mr Swami down several times saying he is not a lawyer just does not suit the occasion well.

    • @SJoshi721
      @SJoshi721 8 років тому +14

      +Sarin G But against that Dr. Swami Nailed that by saying On issue like black money and corruption I am on his side but he is not trust worthy as first he will find the corruption and then later jethmalani will also save that corrupted guy.

    • @manishkumar-uz6hg
      @manishkumar-uz6hg 6 років тому +5

      Anan 7B6 - it was joke between two friends.

    • @hasmukhparmar9130
      @hasmukhparmar9130 6 років тому +14

      I assume, it was friendly banter than humiliation. Looks like Mr Jethmalani holds Swami in high regards than that of most prominent lawyers.

    • @debojyotibanerjee2832
      @debojyotibanerjee2832 5 років тому +1

      It's a debate
      It is all about facts

    • @MKS.GODFATHER
      @MKS.GODFATHER 5 років тому +2

      Buddy Mr. jethmalani is talking law abiding things.. Not politically influenced

  • @iceage369
    @iceage369 8 років тому +7

    Excellent and honest and very Intelligent debate for young ,middle aged and all Educated Indians !! I am glad I found this channel!!

  • @neetasaus
    @neetasaus 8 років тому +111

    Dr. Subramanian Swamy is a CLASS ACT, a pride for India and all Indians anywhere in the world.

  • @chanderkant542
    @chanderkant542 4 роки тому +52

    The same method is used by BJP to abbregate article 370.

    • @theseeker7194
      @theseeker7194 4 роки тому +1

      Article 370 is not totally abrogated. Only clause 1 exists which makes all powers except one (which legally binds Kashmir with other parts of India) of article 370 and 35A ineffective.

  • @AlokPandey1054
    @AlokPandey1054 8 років тому +7

    Hope to see many more debates like this. Also there is a scope of improvement in moderation of debates. Good initiative.

  • @historyplucker1674
    @historyplucker1674 4 роки тому +27

    Majority of support to abrogation of the article was 84 when against were 36...
    Soon after the debate the majority of support raised to 91...
    This shows how Indians are United for the nation despite the religions, languages,regions ....
    Proud to be an Indian

  • @niranjanmohapatra9193
    @niranjanmohapatra9193 3 роки тому +8

    It feels good looking at such debates doesnt matter what ideology you carry watching such videos means you have great sense of talking about different political amd social issue with great respect for opposition and at same time puttinf your views and facts before people

  • @vinayvittal1462
    @vinayvittal1462 4 роки тому +57

    What clarity of thought from our beloved SS. Going back 3 years when this happened , he seems dead right on most things he said A 370. Very insightful and inspiring personality!

  • @jigyasusomsom1175
    @jigyasusomsom1175 3 роки тому +7

    Great debate.... thoroughly enjoyed it....and the results as well...🙏🙏

  • @dragonrageblast
    @dragonrageblast 8 років тому +11

    Subramanyam Swamy is absolutely right about article 370, I searched on google and here is what I found on wiki "370. Temporary provisions with respect to the State of Jammu and Kashmir"

  • @abhaygupta7641
    @abhaygupta7641 8 років тому +95

    Great debate by Siddharth as well by Mr. Swamy. And yes the article 370 should be abolished..!!

    • @gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335
      @gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335 5 років тому +3

      Abhay Gupta discretion is a better part of valour fools rush in where wise fear to tread ,just like this governments governance in all issues

    • @srimantamaity3314
      @srimantamaity3314 5 років тому +5

      @@gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335 Alexander pope also in the same poem says " a little learning is a very dangerous thing " and also that " False criticism is a lot more dangerous than bad action or writing " . Both of these apply to you, so my suggestion is you go and read the whole poem before exposing yourself as a hypocrite who is selective with truth as most leftists are.

    • @kuldeepsinghshekhawat3125
      @kuldeepsinghshekhawat3125 5 років тому

      @@srimantamaity3314 😂😂

  • @MrBshree
    @MrBshree 3 роки тому +35

    Jethmalani: 370 cant be abolished.
    Amit Shah: ohh chacha

    • @heartycann3783
      @heartycann3783 3 роки тому +2

      Only 13 likes 😂

    • @madhavwadhawan8619
      @madhavwadhawan8619 3 роки тому +1

      @KERALA TIGER no he hasn't watch harish salve interview the abolish of article 370 is constitutional

  • @ramchandmehta155
    @ramchandmehta155 6 років тому +68

    Dr. Subramanian is positive critic He not only points out the mistakes but also advice positive action required.

    • @shahanjahan2368
      @shahanjahan2368 6 років тому +3

      Ram chand Mehta
      He was kicked out from Harvard for blasphemy!

    • @sakthikumaran6654
      @sakthikumaran6654 4 роки тому

      ya in my ass

    • @junaidbhat06
      @junaidbhat06 4 роки тому

      What about ram jaithmalani

    • @kislay009
      @kislay009 4 роки тому +2

      @@shahanjahan2368 not kicked out you bloody pig ..he left harvard and then went on teaching at iit delhi...he is one of the youngest professor at harvard not pigs like who normally end at garage

  • @RahulMishra-js8hn
    @RahulMishra-js8hn 5 років тому +52

    The lady spoke something in the beginning which reflected great deal of experience and understanding at ground level which no book or news could possibly reflect.

    • @RishiSingh-rn7dv
      @RishiSingh-rn7dv 4 роки тому

      Its actually partially true , my father told me the something similar about our family history ... We belong from a small town in eastern UP , my father became a doctor and we came to Delhi and i grew up there but he told me an anticdote that one of his grandfather's brother became a sikh even though we are hindus , he said that it was our culture one of our brothers usually became sikh called mona sikh . Although it ended by my grandfayher time , but still it was practised during 19th century among hindus

  • @gangesh_gunjan
    @gangesh_gunjan 8 років тому +22

    nice start..... it would have been great to have some youngster on other side specially kashimiri student.

  • @vamsikrishnaimmandi304
    @vamsikrishnaimmandi304 6 років тому +47

    this article 370 is nothing but pampering that region

  • @IncredibleNeo
    @IncredibleNeo 8 років тому +194

    It is Kashmir and not Cash-Mere!! Mr Tiwari...

    • @nikhil4utube
      @nikhil4utube 8 років тому +21

      +Yogesh Shahane well said!! But he can't help his fake accent becuase he is still a colonized Indian, even after 68 years of independence from Brits...

    • @MrStark-kv6qv
      @MrStark-kv6qv 8 років тому +20

      +Nikhil Chamarty and you are a free Indian yet you don't speak sanskrit as your primary language.

    • @IFoundGodInEminem
      @IFoundGodInEminem 8 років тому +2

      +Mr. Stark OHHH SNAP!

    • @vinayakpatil355
      @vinayakpatil355 7 років тому +7

      Mr. Stark and you are an English man (or may be a fake leftist account), watching an Indian subjective debate. Still would say get the hell out of here. It was nice to have you here listening to us.

    • @nileshsharma7745
      @nileshsharma7745 7 років тому +1

      nice one..

  • @vamsineelam
    @vamsineelam 4 роки тому +5

    Hit like if you came here after the 370 is abolished. Wow this is wat happened today. Hatsoff to swamyji .

  • @pankajdalal9992
    @pankajdalal9992 6 років тому +72

    Sikkim was an independent country and It has become part of India in 1967. Kashmir is part of India why it cannot become part of India?

    • @vikramrazdan5680
      @vikramrazdan5680 5 років тому +4

      The princely state of J&K is already part of India because of the Instrument of Accession of 26th Oct 1947. However, the procedure had to be completed by signing the Instrument of Merger, which Maharaja Hari Singh would have signed. However, Nehru replaced Maharaja Hari Singh with his son Karan Singh and appointed Sheikha Abdullah as the State Administrator in 1947 and went to the UN in 1948 for holding a plebiscite in J&K in 1949; but the plebiscite never took place. Instead Article 370 was inserted in the Constitution of India to complete the merger.

    • @DipakBose-bq1vv
      @DipakBose-bq1vv 5 років тому +1

      There was a referendum in Sikkim.

    • @vikramrazdan5680
      @vikramrazdan5680 5 років тому +3

      @@DipakBose-bq1vv - There is a difference between a plebiscite (simple vote) and a referendum (constitutionally binding). The UN Resolution 47 for plebiscite on Kashmir was for the entire princely state of J&K and not the 40% portion currently with India. But Pakistan foiled all attempts to hold the plebiscite in 1949 after ceasefire was declared on 31st Dec 1948. Thus, to ensure that J&K (India) could function, Article 370 was included into the Constitution as a a temporary measure. However, a temporary measure cannot go on forever if Pakistan is not going to vacate PoK.

    • @vikramrazdan5680
      @vikramrazdan5680 5 років тому +4

      Raghu Reddy - You are a crazy lunatic. Maharaja Hari Singh had put Sheikh Abdullah in prison for his anti-Kashmir activities, but was forced by Nehru to appoint Sheikh Abdullah as the State Administrator in Oct 1947. Thereafter, to accommodate Sheikh further, Nehru forced Hari Singh out in 1949 and replaced him with Karan Singh (who was only 18 years old). This gave complete power to Abdullah courtesy of Nehru, followed by the flawed Article 370 being incorporated in India’s Constitution. Btw, Hari Singh died in 1961 in Bombay.

    • @sakthikumaran6654
      @sakthikumaran6654 4 роки тому

      Sikkim also has special status u knuckle head!! ask ur bjpig gov to scrap that too...

  • @nofavors
    @nofavors 8 років тому +6

    Should have more debates like this.

  • @kushaltm6325
    @kushaltm6325 5 років тому

    Thank you Newslaundry for this educatinaol endeavour.

  • @madhuag321
    @madhuag321 8 років тому +1

    We want more debates like this...

  • @smruti93rsa
    @smruti93rsa 4 роки тому +57

    This is to show the future generation that I was here on the day of abolishment of article 370.
    -5th August 2019
    Jai Hind

    • @FollowersOfPrabhupada
      @FollowersOfPrabhupada 4 роки тому +3

      hahahaha...nice way of recording history....This day is more important day for India over the independence day....excellent move by Modi Govt and Home minister Mr, Shah

    • @someshchandrasharma6079
      @someshchandrasharma6079 4 роки тому +1

      Let's celebrate the day! Today

    • @acesin-et7pp
      @acesin-et7pp 4 роки тому

      Do not argue with a fool. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with his experience. You are a perfect example of middle ages colonial minded people. So when your children will ask you what do those kashmiri, whom you call Indians by force, do on republic day, independence day and when India loses matches or do they sing Indian national anthems. Tell them they don't care and they celebrate them as black days. they use firecrackers when India loses and they dont even know what is India's national anthem. When I was a kid I used to support indian cricket team, and my dad used to get angry. I used to read indian technology and actually love india. Then my uncle told him, dont say anything to him, one day he will see india and know from his own experience. And guess what, he was right. That is the picture you build for history. Well if you don't care about that then you can tell them, the distance between Kashmir and india is 0 miles but the distance between Kashmiri and Indians is the distance between two galaxies which can never meet. Honestly, Aborogation of article 370 would have been possible if there was a discussion and there were high chances that it would have been passed by the assembly although not overwhelmingly but would have passed. Before scrapping 370 it was still ok. Although people were not emotionally part of India they were mentally. Now it is emotionally and mentally zero support for India. you can use as much force but you cant turn our hearts and minds. The use of deception and force changed the whole game. It will be the last disaster of Modi after the demonetization disaster. He did this only for his election and people are blinded by nationalism that they don't see it. India's economic growth was slowing and he needed a boost for people to vote for him. He succeeded but will at a very high cost. You never heard the quote. You can take a horse to water but can't make it drink. I am not sure you even understand what it means.

    • @FollowersOfPrabhupada
      @FollowersOfPrabhupada 4 роки тому

      @@acesin-et7pp Looks like you are an inflicted individual of Kashmir. No doubt, Modi was right. It is evident in your message. People like you being in Kshmir made it ... what it is today.

    • @acesin-et7pp
      @acesin-et7pp 4 роки тому

      @@FollowersOfPrabhupada turns out you did not even understand what I wrote.

  • @e-sportindia7524
    @e-sportindia7524 5 років тому +18

    guys is that article 370 is debatable topic either it was abolished or not .. I think there should be the debate on how it can be abolished

    • @kpal8401
      @kpal8401 5 років тому

      Yes totally agree with you

    • @shreya3737
      @shreya3737 Рік тому

      No dude let me clear some things if it will be abolished then outsiders like british will again come with excuses to trade and then the situation will again go back to what it was 100 yrs ago
      Article 370 is the cornerstone between the relationship between kashmir and other parts of india

  • @ateeeesh
    @ateeeesh 5 років тому

    22:00 onwards is what really got my attention. great analysis !

  • @sudarsanpatra1929
    @sudarsanpatra1929 5 років тому +1

    All news channels should follow such civilised debate . I urge these channels to learn this.

  • @nikhilattri28
    @nikhilattri28 7 років тому +30

    can we get more debates like this. i love to listen people thoughts on article 370

  • @Thoughtomobile
    @Thoughtomobile 6 років тому +30

    What a mountain of bullshit from both sides! The matter is very simple! Maharaja Hari Singh was the owner of all the land he ruled. He signed it over to the India. Since then, the Republic of India is the Ultimate Owner of that real estate. The Kashmiri people are tenants. It they do not like the landlord, they can vacate the land and move on to live under some other landlord who offers better conditions.

    • @Bharath_007
      @Bharath_007 6 років тому +3

      Quanta Sanctum haha khullam khulla.
      Khel katham dukan bandh

  • @adithyanair820
    @adithyanair820 5 років тому

    What a beautiful debate! Kudos for the organisers

  • @tadarlaryk1218
    @tadarlaryk1218 6 років тому +2

    These two articles are like a dichotomy which cannot be compared

  • @JunaidSofi1
    @JunaidSofi1 5 років тому +3

    Really a good and respectable debate really love it

  • @jugnu361
    @jugnu361 7 років тому +73

    if it was china or pakistan......they would done it 50 yrs back......poor indian system....pathetic

    • @dwivedi90
      @dwivedi90 5 років тому +7

      It's not only about the system brother, is about the fucking people here as well like who support 370 ,tukde tukde gang etc...

    • @gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335
      @gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335 5 років тому +1

      Sachin Singh do not compare India with China and Pakistan we are a secular socialistic parliamentary system of govt not religious or autocratic

    • @rex_schd
      @rex_schd 5 років тому +2

      @@gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335 Yeah India is a MAHAN country ..continue sending tax money collected from main land India to kashmir and enjoy kashmiri abusing indian army personl and India

    • @gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335
      @gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335 5 років тому +1

      D C taxes are misused in our country by the govt so what if spent for people ,look how much money has been spent by the BJP in this election ,only god knows how this election has been won don’t think people have voted or will vote a govt failed on all fronts ......

    • @rex_schd
      @rex_schd 5 років тому

      @@gopalakrishnanonvinkere4335 Look at every social parameters of Bihar , UP , haryana , Rajasthan . Which is worst than Somalia or Bangladesh. India government spends much much lesser money per person on these states than Kashmir .this has been going on for 70years with no result in the name of appeasement politics . In the end Kashmiri see themself as Muslim or pakistani first ..rather than Indian .India sacrificed other states people for Kashmir .what they get ? Nothing . Thanks article 370 other states people are foreigner in Kashmir. This joke needs to stop . Kashmiri exploitation blackmail of india needs to stop . Kashmir needs to integrate fully like any other nation would have done.

  • @rishitk
    @rishitk 5 років тому +4

    23:10 I completely completely agree with you ma'am.

  • @pragasamramaswamy8714
    @pragasamramaswamy8714 8 років тому +8

    captivating and informative speech by manish tiwari.

    • @imninad
      @imninad 7 років тому +1

      he lied , when he said india signed stand still with J&K . very informative indeed about what kind of person manish tiwari is..

    • @dhanrajsingadiya5887
      @dhanrajsingadiya5887 6 років тому

      why he lie sir he public debate , Jethmaly or Swamy same party or Swamy also a congeressi in past

  • @MihirMishraMe
    @MihirMishraMe 5 років тому +3

    22:37 most balanced analysis.

  • @surajhial2797
    @surajhial2797 4 роки тому +13

    The applause after every personal attack (from both side) shows the mentality of our people. Wearing nice cloth, speaking good English and not shouting is fine but not good enough. By the way always an admirer of Newslaundry especially Abhinandan and Manisha

  • @RohitMishraplus
    @RohitMishraplus 6 років тому +29

    Ram Jethmalani looses to Swamy because Article 370 is not mentioned in Constitution of J & K .
    Swamy rightly said that it can be removed even through by executive action.

    • @rayeerev8302
      @rayeerev8302 5 років тому +1

      Rohit Mishra but he just read out the relevant portion from the constitution of j&k. Can you prove your claim sir?

    • @TILKESHBHADALA
      @TILKESHBHADALA 5 років тому +3

      There is this general clause which says any resolution in regards what is already passed by the constituent assembly of J&K cannot be revoked.
      Read the following for more clarity :
      Article 3 in part 2 of the Jammu and Kashmir constitution reads as, "Relationship of the State with the Union of India:-The State of Jammu and Kashmir is and shall be an integral part of the Union of India."[7][8]
      Article 5 of the part 2 is about extent of "Executive" and "Legislative" powers of the state which tells that Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly has executive and legislative power of all matters except those with respect to which Parliament of India has power to make laws for the State under the provisions of the Constitution of India.[7] Sectors in which Government of India can make laws for Jammu and Kashmir includes Defense sector, Foreign affairs, Finance and Communication.[2][3]
      Article 147 of Part 12 is about amendment of the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution which states that, "No Bill shall be introduced or moved in State Legislative Assembly to amend or change above mentioned articles 3 and 5."

    • @hcnagaraj
      @hcnagaraj 5 років тому +1

      Yes it is not revokable at JK constitution. But Ram Jethmalani can talk in any side. But he did not justify why it should be there. Indian constitution can override JK constitution after removing article in Indian constitution on the basis of descrimination.

    • @aswanik40
      @aswanik40 5 років тому

      Y not do then by bjp

    • @alwynsam5349
      @alwynsam5349 5 років тому

      I don't think so...the judiciary might well strike it down as a violation of the basic structure doctrine

  • @NidzShah-ps6kr
    @NidzShah-ps6kr 8 років тому +58

    Siddharth and Dr.Subramanian Swamy were the best!

    • @ShiladityaSaha4sg
      @ShiladityaSaha4sg 7 років тому +10

      The kid can't frame one sentence without the words "like" or "right" in it. He was a joke.

    • @sasidharpatri287
      @sasidharpatri287 7 років тому

      +Shiladitya Saha . Yes, probably the one with humongous achievements is difficult to understand without simpler words.

    • @ShiladityaSaha4sg
      @ShiladityaSaha4sg 7 років тому +3

      The argument is not about simplicity or complexity. The uses of "like" and "right" in the context of the sentences he is framing have no discernible purpose as parts of speech, which in turn make the entire sentence grammatically incorrect and may be considered poor and inarticulate oratory skills.

    • @bagchiniagara
      @bagchiniagara 7 років тому

      Sasidhar Patri

    • @ramabc11
      @ramabc11 7 років тому

      Abhishek was also good

  • @visho8979
    @visho8979 8 років тому +65

    Tiwari, it's Kashmir not kashmere, fix your accent. Mr. Jethmalani, I am a Sindhi too, and I am starting to loose respect for you, with your absolute narrowmindedness and short range view on the unity of India.

    • @em45596
      @em45596 5 років тому

      I am agree with you.....Mr Manish is Jackal and member of Congress

  • @rajatverma2038
    @rajatverma2038 3 роки тому +6

    382 days since article 370 has been abolished as of 21August2019! And level of “prosperity” and “growth” is so impeccable that Jammu now has 4G service we’ll see in other parts soon 🙃 (just a year ago earthquake break down internet facilities in J&K) 🙃

  • @007arjunpandey
    @007arjunpandey 6 років тому +1

    Very healthy n ellequent way of debate...... News Channel should learn.....

  • @animeshsharma1445
    @animeshsharma1445 4 роки тому +1

    "We tell you "

  • @shhuayb
    @shhuayb 2 роки тому +6

    22:47 Subramanium reading Law on WhatsApp

    • @abhishek6725
      @abhishek6725 Рік тому

      Exactly can't even refer to fact just speak random fallacy 😂

  • @amritpalsingh3293
    @amritpalsingh3293 5 років тому +5

    @10.00,
    do I need to support or oppose the motion.
    Well Done Mr. JethMalani.......

  • @babaiyermanispiritualandpo2062
    @babaiyermanispiritualandpo2062 8 років тому

    good and nice civil debate.?we need more like this debate.

  • @vmahant1
    @vmahant1 6 років тому +2

    Excellent debate, all of them did a great job.

  • @abhishekscm
    @abhishekscm 4 роки тому +28

    Finally proved dr.swamywas 💯% right !!!after 370

    • @sakthikumaran6654
      @sakthikumaran6654 4 роки тому

      Lol!! the supreme court still has to decide whether its legal or not!!!

    • @HeavenRacer422
      @HeavenRacer422 3 роки тому

      @@sakthikumaran6654 it was legal moron

  • @RajatAggarwal91
    @RajatAggarwal91 8 років тому +3

    Apart from all the dividing opinions, has anybody else noticed: Youngster on "for" side talked more practically. Older on "against" side talked more about reputation, pride and legality than ethics and "should"

    • @thirumalraja
      @thirumalraja 8 років тому +1

      +Rajat Aggarwal Older spoke for 370 and younger spoke against 370., nothing is wrong with 370.

    • @RajatAggarwal91
      @RajatAggarwal91 8 років тому +1

      because older spoke for 370?
      Young is more optimistic. Old usually defend their experience.

    • @nikhil4utube
      @nikhil4utube 8 років тому

      +Rajat Aggarwal that's a good observation. It is because the young generation is forward thinking and has realized that article 370 has not solved any purpose in Kashmir and made things worse than it was before introducing this article.

    • @coolblizzard1993
      @coolblizzard1993 8 років тому

      +Rajat Aggarwal Noe necessarily. To me it seemed as if tyagarajan had crammed a major part of his speech as if he was debating in a school. His tone was too aggressive.

  • @spat6922
    @spat6922 3 роки тому

    Interestingly no one argued/expected the manner in which it was actually done. Didn't they see that coming or possibility of doing it with Presidential order?? how?

  • @gulamgaush8843
    @gulamgaush8843 4 роки тому +2

    Good debate.. Mr. Jethmalani, Mr Manish and Mrs. Madhu as an Indian showed a correct form of India, Indianess and its constitution.. They have correct knowledge of history and constitution of India. We are Indian. We win hearts, not play with hearts...

  • @bipinpatel8683
    @bipinpatel8683 5 років тому +7

    Nehru never debated to implement 35 A in group or rejyasabha , loksabha . Why we debate when we want to demolish the same ? ? Just perform and finish the evil .

    • @asifmir9604
      @asifmir9604 5 років тому

      Aray bhab ray baab...Mera email note Kara hamaray yaha net bohat kam chalta hai...agar eliminate hua 370 mail karna bhai

  • @mithunshivashankar1626
    @mithunshivashankar1626 8 років тому +9

    Please conduct more debates like these which is very civil in manner, unlike Arnab's show. Hats off.

  • @anikettripathi7991
    @anikettripathi7991 4 роки тому +2

    when wisdom of leader is accompanied by love for country and people.all the action automatically becomes favourable for the country.

  • @kumarsaurabh2452
    @kumarsaurabh2452 7 років тому +1

    Nice debate!!

  • @akshaikhaanth8559
    @akshaikhaanth8559 5 років тому +8

    Swamy I want to be your assistant man you made my life very beautiful by your strong words

  • @aabidbhat3816
    @aabidbhat3816 7 років тому +5

    This lady have something in her mind. Being kashmiri, she only put some right facts which are true at ground level.

  • @Tshewang566
    @Tshewang566 Рік тому

    Imperfectly balanced opposition. Definitely proves that the debate was pre-decided to lean towards for the motion. The young members of the panel had put forward well researched arguments that were unjustly argued against.

  • @mallikarjunabandara233
    @mallikarjunabandara233 5 років тому +1

    Why the debates in parliament doesn't like this?......brilliant debate.....

    • @kumarbhavya944
      @kumarbhavya944 3 роки тому

      Because all the people who sit there are uneducated

  • @shriramj5195
    @shriramj5195 8 років тому +15

    Not much depth. Last comments by Mr.Jethmalani and Swamy on interpretation was worth watching.

  • @1984abhasharma
    @1984abhasharma 8 років тому +7

    Love Mr. Swamy for what he doing, feel so positive whenever i listen to him. Wonder why he is not given FM position yet, this man is sharp and can get things done. Who on earth would have thought that madam and son duo would even get summoned for nation herald. Love u Sir...wish i was even 1% of what u are..

  • @venugopalpadigel5545
    @venugopalpadigel5545 6 років тому

    please more details

  • @gunnyu0012
    @gunnyu0012 3 роки тому +1

    Good one thanks

  • @tadarlaryk1218
    @tadarlaryk1218 6 років тому +3

    Article 371 granted to respective states were drawn in parallel to Article 370 by Manish Tiwari which is so uncalled for. I feel he needs to be responsible enough to make such a baseless allegations

  • @ShubhamGupta-kf8vr
    @ShubhamGupta-kf8vr 8 років тому +33

    I have checked no mention of article 370 in J&K constitution...

    • @TILKESHBHADALA
      @TILKESHBHADALA 5 років тому +6

      There is this general clause which says any resolution in regards what is already passed by the constituent assembly of J&K cannot be revoked.
      Read the following for more clarity :
      Article 3 in part 2 of the Jammu and Kashmir constitution reads as, "Relationship of the State with the Union of India:-The State of Jammu and Kashmir is and shall be an integral part of the Union of India."[7][8]
      Article 5 of the part 2 is about extent of "Executive" and "Legislative" powers of the state which tells that Jammu and Kashmir Legislative Assembly has executive and legislative power of all matters except those with respect to which Parliament of India has power to make laws for the State under the provisions of the Constitution of India.[7] Sectors in which Government of India can make laws for Jammu and Kashmir includes Defense sector, Foreign affairs, Finance and Communication.[2][3]
      Article 147 of Part 12 is about amendment of the Jammu and Kashmir Constitution which states that, "No Bill shall be introduced or moved in State Legislative Assembly to amend or change above mentioned articles 3 and 5."

    • @krishba827
      @krishba827 4 роки тому

      @@TILKESHBHADALA how does this explain that nothing can be amended

    • @TILKESHBHADALA
      @TILKESHBHADALA 4 роки тому

      @@krishba827 To understand that you will have to refer Instrument of Accession and Simla Accord. Whereas article 370 was originally named 306 A and later on it was renumbered as article 370.

    • @krishba827
      @krishba827 4 роки тому

      @@TILKESHBHADALA oh no thanks, as soon as i replied to you, i understood the article 😂. Thanks thoughh

    • @civilthai7041
      @civilthai7041 3 роки тому

      26:48 swamy is giving water

  • @voiceofdenotifiednomadictr481
    @voiceofdenotifiednomadictr481 2 роки тому

    Very substantial points were given by madam Madhu ji. Very impartial views.

  • @whatslifespurpose
    @whatslifespurpose 8 років тому

    The best part of discussion starts from 22:47

  • @millenniumspotm.g.sudarsanan
    @millenniumspotm.g.sudarsanan 8 років тому +34

    Thivari is either a Hijada or a Gay !!. certainly he can represent only Congress.

    • @pratyushpandey2855
      @pratyushpandey2855 7 років тому +5

      Sudarsanan Madhavan nothing wrong with hijda or gay, anyway bjp has more hijda support than congress..

    • @Bharath_007
      @Bharath_007 6 років тому

      Sudarsanan Madhavan chepraasi

    • @shirishgajjar7379
      @shirishgajjar7379 5 років тому +1

      You are RIGHT!

  • @0xcrypto
    @0xcrypto 3 роки тому +9

    When siddharth started talking about land ownership in kashmir for the development, he ignored the fact that Jammu & Kashmir is in Himalayan Range and bringing industries would mean bringing pollution as well. That is why it isn't (or wasn't?) legal for outsiders to buy land in Uttarakhand as well. I believe it was a right decision to abolish Article 370 but allowing land ownership to outsiders is a bad bad idea.

  • @avilashabhuyan3500
    @avilashabhuyan3500 6 років тому

    A healthy debate👍 we need more such

  • @Harry.B.W
    @Harry.B.W 2 роки тому +2

    we need this type of debade|

  • @gdgobi7330
    @gdgobi7330 4 роки тому +5

    Maybe Hindians should get out of Kashmir and let the People of Kashmir follow their own Future.

    • @mandeep5993
      @mandeep5993 4 роки тому +1

      🤣🤣🤣.
      People from all over India are going to settle in Kashmir now, and there is absolutely nothing that you can do to stop it.

    • @gdgobi7330
      @gdgobi7330 4 роки тому

      @@mandeep5993 This is pure hatred against people. You don't want Muslims but you just want their land.

    • @neharai4927
      @neharai4927 4 роки тому

      U go to Kashmir no dumbhead. After u get pelted with stone akkal thikane aayenge

  • @RahulThakur-rt5ic
    @RahulThakur-rt5ic 4 роки тому +20

    Finally proved dr.swamywas 💯% right !!!after 370 being abrogated exactly as Dr.Swamy mentioned.

    • @lakeind2020
      @lakeind2020 4 роки тому

      He was not absolutely right. As mentioned by Ram Jethmalani concurrence of J&K assembly required for abrogation of art 370. Finally central govt abrogated art 370 through presidential order and without concurrence of J&K due to president rule in J&k

    • @RahulThakur-rt5ic
      @RahulThakur-rt5ic 4 роки тому +3

      @@lakeind2020370 was temporary provision had nothing to do with the integration of JK to india...that is the bottom line and Dr.swamy said *370 could be abrogated with out the concent of legislative assembly merely by through presidential rule...Dr. Swamy was 100% correct.

    • @RahulThakur-rt5ic
      @RahulThakur-rt5ic 4 роки тому

      @@lakeind2020 Jk assembly was not the necessary and the only the way of abrogation of 370, presidential order was sufficient and other means of abrogation.... which was What was followed. And forming the govt with PDP was the first step...lol 😀😂🙏

    • @kislay009
      @kislay009 4 роки тому

      @@lakeind2020 dude article 370 is abrogated the same way with intense discussion with swamiji proved swamiji is 100% right and though not holding a law degree swamiji is way better lawyer than jethmalani..

  • @harshali8772
    @harshali8772 5 років тому

    In the initial presentation by speakers, the younger generation overshadowed the eminent individuals on the panel. Youth can usher change in India, it is important for schools to ingrain in us social responsibility and an understanding of socio-political and economic issues.

  • @rudrajit2681
    @rudrajit2681 2 роки тому +2

    370 got abolished, it truly harmed the federalism of India.

  • @krswathi
    @krswathi 8 років тому +15

    Donald Trump is right, I could not understand the accent those Indian Youth's / audience is blabbering...

    • @anilkrmost
      @anilkrmost 8 років тому +11

      Even that youth do not understand what Trump blabbering about..anyway...I woild like to see Mr. Trump speaking other language other than English.

    • @sandesh016
      @sandesh016 6 років тому

      krswathi its good to know that you people dont speak a proper english and even you cannot mingle with the rest of the world rather than to be inside well usa.. i guess u know what is a well.

    • @sandesh016
      @sandesh016 5 років тому

      Just pronounce zebra and we will decide how much u people know pronouncing english

    • @AnilNairP
      @AnilNairP 4 роки тому +1

      I could understand every word of everyone who spoke. But yeah keep blabbering

    • @calvinpalanna2778
      @calvinpalanna2778 4 роки тому

      @@AnilNairP hahaha 🤣🤣🤣

  • @savoryicon
    @savoryicon 8 років тому +20

    siddharth tyagarajan, great speech, but a little lower tone and lesser aggression would have been nicer

    • @geek2core
      @geek2core 8 років тому

      +savory icon And a little slower.

    • @coolblizzard1993
      @coolblizzard1993 8 років тому +1

      +savory icon Thats what I thought, he sounded as if he was still debating in a school. His tone is annoying too. It appeared as if he had crammed the speech.

    • @anan7b66
      @anan7b66 8 років тому +2

      +savory icon He is intelligent but he is very young. One can understand he may have lot of energy and enthusiasm. Wonder why the organizers couldn't find more qualified older persons for the discussion.

    • @savoryicon
      @savoryicon 8 років тому

      Sarin G well, maybe to give an opportunity for his enthusiasm to share his ideas

    • @anan7b66
      @anan7b66 8 років тому +2

      +savory icon
      Yes ..I actually like the idea of mixing the young with old for a good perspective. Hope he imbibes all of Dr Swami's wisdom. We need many Swami clones.

  • @vaibhav_nitesh
    @vaibhav_nitesh 2 роки тому

    Why the mics of speakers have been kept on such low volume, really annnoying.

  • @r.v.7322
    @r.v.7322 6 років тому

    Each Speaker give his own opinion if we wish to understand than we should understand each speakers Genuine thought & evolve own thought.
    I think we have to be realistic & we should not go on exaggerated anything.
    Major issue is Governance

  • @tanu3333
    @tanu3333 8 років тому +11

    Half knowledge is always dangerous

    • @munaswamymvm109
      @munaswamymvm109 3 роки тому

      thanks that you accept it

    • @tanu3333
      @tanu3333 3 роки тому

      @@munaswamymvm109 I did not accept it but I understood the harrassment n problem one invite with half knowledge.

  • @Amareeka
    @Amareeka 8 років тому +5

    how the constituent assembly of JnK is above the king or above His heir of that time?

    • @jedimaster9922
      @jedimaster9922 8 років тому

      +Amar Jit Singh It is not.

    • @pushapjeetsharma001
      @pushapjeetsharma001 8 років тому +2

      Bcz The King gave the Instrument Of Accession to the GOI.
      Guess It wasn't that difficult to understand !

    • @vedula-uq1wj
      @vedula-uq1wj 5 років тому

      He was forced to give up, the international money masters made it happen we still are not allowed to print our own money to regulate economy, our TV industry is controlled by foreign element, we are in debt? For what for printing our own money? We give gibs to lower caste and muslims for what? We could build bridges and what not.

  • @mrityunjaisingh5630
    @mrityunjaisingh5630 7 років тому

    can I know the name of mr speaker

  • @soumyamukherjee02
    @soumyamukherjee02 2 роки тому

    😭... Found the gem so lately...

  • @narayanmahale296
    @narayanmahale296 6 років тому +34

    Swamy the great.. Jethmalani lost respect not only from old generation but also from all the viewers of this debate..everytime he was looking arrogant as well as in insulting mood and I was shocked that he was not debating for United India.. I felt ashamed of myself to listen to him... no wonder as Swamy said jethmalani will fight against as well as for the corruption defending corrupt people in the court. What to talk of Tiwari .. he is Congress culture.. so you can't expect better from him. Siddarth is very good.

  • @WhiteTiger1969
    @WhiteTiger1969 8 років тому +5

    Dr Swami is a gem and a gift to Bharat. He will never open his mouth without knowing about what he is talking about. No one can BS with him. All the criminals and goons will shit bricks in front of him. He is very right in this whole article 370 drama.

  • @akshitpuri7033
    @akshitpuri7033 3 роки тому +2

    What I've realised after watching fist 20 minutes is that speaking less and to the point is much better than blabbering just to finish the time

  • @gaurav36901
    @gaurav36901 5 років тому

    Than Survey.

  • @aayushroy0609
    @aayushroy0609 5 років тому +7

    Mr Ram Jethmlani wasted no time pointing out that he's a lawyer and Dr Swamy is not. Yet, he was wrong in saying that Article 370 is a part of the J&K Constitution and Dr Swamy did a quick Google and found out that Article 370 is not mentioned in J&K Constitution.

  • @palayanjayaraman7138
    @palayanjayaraman7138 8 років тому +3

    intellectual debate, what parliament couldn't achieve in the past, this platform displayed democratically intelligent discussion on sensitive issue like kashmir and article 370. jaya palayan.

  • @SuperRagala
    @SuperRagala 4 роки тому +1

    Came back to watch this after ........ Well you know.

  • @harshanand7128
    @harshanand7128 2 роки тому

    what shocked me is that, literally no one talked about the ill impact of development on environment.

  • @ksaiveer
    @ksaiveer 4 роки тому +16

    I have witnessed article 370 abrogation
    5th august 2019

  • @bijandutta8467
    @bijandutta8467 4 роки тому +3

    Subramanian Swamy as a wise politician never going to accept his loss.

  • @vemalarajuraju6639
    @vemalarajuraju6639 8 років тому

    Unless amendment of article 370 we cannot expect the development of kashmir it is very nice debate I appreciate and admire the organisers fir having conducted

  • @Bharath_007
    @Bharath_007 6 років тому +1

    Siddharth kudos👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏