Carrier Flying A Royal Navy Instructional Film (1946)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 гру 2015
  • This is one of 3 WW2 instructional films available on DVD
    RN12 Forties Navy - Flying Machines
    The Royal Navy's flying capabilities developed rapidly during World War Two. This programme reflects the development by way of three Royal Navy training films from the film archives of the Imperial War Museum.Catapult Ships (1940), Deck Landing (1942), Carrier Flying (1946)Black and White 76 mins
    "Fantastic" Flypast September 2005
    "A high quality, educative programme totally devoid of gimmicks" Aircraft Illustrated August 2005
    Available from Beulah at www.eavb.co.uk/store/index.html
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 95

  • @MopheadMason
    @MopheadMason 3 роки тому +6

    For further reading see 'Wings on My Sleeve' by Captain Eric "Winkle" Brown RN. Think it may have been him landing the Vampire and Mosquito in this video. He holds the record for carrier landings and most aircraft types flown. One of his jobs in WWII was to test and write procedure for new aircraft when landing on carriers!

    • @Pitcairn2
      @Pitcairn2 3 роки тому

      Just read it great stuff.

    • @harry616
      @harry616 Рік тому +2

      YES and i have met him in ww2 when he Landed on my ship in H.M.S, INDEFATIGABLE

  • @neil6477
    @neil6477 5 років тому +41

    These films are absolutely bloody brilliant! They are as much about social history as military history. The whole film is so engaging in so many different ways. What a different world it was. Thanks SO much for the upload!

  • @slowbasil
    @slowbasil 3 роки тому +3

    It's bonkers seeing things like the Vampire on a carrier deck only 4 years after a film predominantly about Swordfish operations.

    • @Pitcairn2
      @Pitcairn2 3 роки тому

      The War accelerated technology big time.

  • @andredegraaf1643
    @andredegraaf1643 5 років тому +5

    Fantastic video! I am actually amazed at how advanced technology was 75 years ago.

  • @JonnyDeadly
    @JonnyDeadly Рік тому

    Very informative instructional film. Thanks for this.

  • @richardweldon2062
    @richardweldon2062 4 роки тому +7

    Never mind that straightforward deck landing malarkey, it's getting the received pronunciation just right... 😉

    • @v8pilot
      @v8pilot 3 роки тому +1

      Some kids at my school took 'elocution lesson' to learn to speak like that.

  • @JonnKammeron
    @JonnKammeron 7 років тому +3

    Thank you. The Naval Aviation Videos Are Outstanding.

  • @alvarotorres8065
    @alvarotorres8065 6 років тому +2

    Admiravel the effort of the old heroes of the aviation in the development of techniques for the perfect use and control of the aircraft in their various situations of difficulty of landing or takeoff. A lesson of determination for the development of these techniques to be perfected in the future! They deserve our respect and admiration and thanks!

  • @paulnunnink7338
    @paulnunnink7338 4 роки тому +1

    I'm starting to get it! Great instructional value and well done. Calm and clear. Respect.

  • @xjboy550
    @xjboy550 7 років тому +2

    Many thanks for putting this up

  • @eduardodeandres3864
    @eduardodeandres3864 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for posting, good stuff

  • @Lockbar
    @Lockbar 5 років тому +9

    2:41 "Bloody Fool" ….Hey, I just learned lip reading!!

  • @GFSLombardo
    @GFSLombardo 4 роки тому +6

    Young Sub-Lt Wilson did it again and soon became Able Seaman Wilson assigned to boiler cleaning duties.

    • @neiloflongbeck5705
      @neiloflongbeck5705 3 роки тому

      No, he changed his name to Philips and became a Navigator...

  • @g2macs
    @g2macs 4 роки тому +3

    You couldn't get an aircraft more difficult to land on a carrier than a Corsair. So difficult that the USN gave up on it until the Fleet Air Arm
    came up with a way to do it safely.

    • @steveb6103
      @steveb6103 4 роки тому +1

      @Tabourba They clipped the wings because the British carriers were smaller than the USN's . To fit in the the hanger with the wings folded.

    • @dogsnads5634
      @dogsnads5634 4 роки тому

      @Tabourba Oleo bounce was an issue as well, the RN cured that.

    • @daniellastuart3145
      @daniellastuart3145 3 роки тому

      @@steveb6103 yes that the reason for the clip wing the result of them is what Tabourba said

    • @LV_CRAZY
      @LV_CRAZY 2 роки тому

      The abundance of Hellcats had much to do with the this decision. The British didn't have that luxury.

  • @jamesprice4647
    @jamesprice4647 Рік тому

    The voices are priceless.

  • @davidrowcliffe58
    @davidrowcliffe58 4 роки тому +5

    "Deck landing is not difficult or dangerous"

    • @decam5329
      @decam5329 3 роки тому +2

      Every successful landing is a failed suicide.

  • @mariebcfhs9491
    @mariebcfhs9491 4 роки тому +1

    "avoid this at all cost"
    a random Hellcat: hold my beer

  • @superancientmariner1394
    @superancientmariner1394 6 років тому

    Nice to see the old R.N.V.R. lace again.

    • @tamar5261
      @tamar5261 4 роки тому

      Go to any sea cadet unit to see the wavy Navy

  • @xxPROXxx
    @xxPROXxx 6 років тому +3

    Corsairs here are most likely the Brewster manufactured Mk.III's that were given to the FAA, around 334 total.

    • @keithlaycock9059
      @keithlaycock9059 5 років тому +1

      Yes, they are. The Corsair marked "E-3U" that is seen practicing landing at the shore base around 23:55 has the serial no. JS719, which was a Brewster F3A-1.

    • @WCOG053
      @WCOG053 4 роки тому

      Keith Laycock well at least Brewster made something useful eventually...

  • @hairybear7705
    @hairybear7705 5 років тому

    I say chaps, did you hear, old Ponsenby-Smythe just pranged his crate.... straight into the deck! The Old Man is absolutely livid. Said it's his turn in the barrel tonight........ Captain's Choice !!!

  • @stuco81
    @stuco81 6 років тому

    "I say, permission to wizz the tower?"
    "Something I should know about, old chap?"

  • @budburr66
    @budburr66 4 роки тому +3

    Not only brilliant flying, but a great english lesson to boot!

  • @davidparsons452
    @davidparsons452 5 років тому +2

    Dammit Wilson!

  • @harry616
    @harry616 Рік тому

    H.M.S.INDEFATIGABLE I served on her in iww2 for 4 years in Home Fleet and PACIFIC Fleet and in all the Actions she was at OKINAWA being the last one then to Tokio Bay to see eh surrender of Japanese Forces 1945

  • @jamesedmister9922
    @jamesedmister9922 4 роки тому

    Pretty tricky stuff!!!!

  • @sconniepanda5835
    @sconniepanda5835 4 роки тому

    Great stuff...all these deck lendings….and slae flying. Is Tom Cruise playing the part of Wilson here? Jolly gid stuff here...on with the deck lendings then.

  • @PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars
    @PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars 5 років тому +2

    One question. How does the batsman judge the height and speed? Seems a tough job. I do love these old films. Thanks for sharing!

    • @shananagans5
      @shananagans5 5 років тому +1

      In the early days they had reference markings on the ship so they could kind of judge where the aircraft was in relation to the ship but it was mostly just experience of having watched hundreds come in for landing.
      Later they developed a device, almost like a sight that showed if they were to high, to low etc. It has been a while so I don't recall the name of the video, or details but there is a video here on UA-cam showing how the batsman's job is done and the advancements up to modern electronic systems.

    • @PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars
      @PercyPruneMHDOIFandBars 5 років тому +1

      Amazing! That so many successful landings could be pulled off using only mk1 eyeball! Damn those guys were good! Thanks for the answer.

    • @decam5329
      @decam5329 3 роки тому +2

      The batsman is an experienced flyer in his own right.

  • @tanyano9
    @tanyano9 4 роки тому +1

    Anyone know where the land based landings are done..

    • @Moriarty1st
      @Moriarty1st 4 роки тому +1

      Tanyano9 - Easthaven in Scotland.

    • @tanyano9
      @tanyano9 4 роки тому

      @@Moriarty1st I wonder if Eric Winkle Brown was in any of these..?

    • @Moriarty1st
      @Moriarty1st 4 роки тому +1

      Don't think so, but my father was.

    • @tanyano9
      @tanyano9 4 роки тому

      @@Moriarty1st So which one was your father..?

    • @Moriarty1st
      @Moriarty1st 4 роки тому +2

      @@tanyano9
      Can't say for sure (if at all) but according to his log book, on Oct 3rd 1945 he was flying Corsairs 'M' & 'S' in 731 Squadron at East Haven on "film work" as a clockwork mouse - doing ADDLs for training sprog batsmen. M & S feature in the film, so it might possibly (??) be him. Left in May 46.

  • @alvarotorres8065
    @alvarotorres8065 6 років тому

    Admiravel o esforço dos antigos herois da aviação no desemvolvimento de tecnicas para o pefeito uso e controle das aeronaves em suas diversas situações de dificuldade de pouso ou decolagem. Uma aula de determinação para a o desenvolvimento dessas técnicas para serem aperfeiçoadas no futuro! Merecem nosso respeito e admiração e agradecimento!

  • @freemenofengland2880
    @freemenofengland2880 6 років тому +2

    Love the fake news bit: "Wilson was one of those types who thought deck landing was just too easy..." LMAAO.

  • @lumpyfishgravy
    @lumpyfishgravy 5 років тому +1

    Who else watches this just for the delicious RP? 8:15 "A fleek of the baats"

  • @chrisgale828
    @chrisgale828 4 роки тому

    I have often wonded why do aircraft come in to land with a sweeping turn rather than coming in straight

    • @kazsmaz
      @kazsmaz 4 роки тому +1

      Keeping a view of the carrier at all times.

    • @davidhutchison3343
      @davidhutchison3343 4 роки тому +1

      The nose of the aircraft is so long, coming in straight means the pilot looses sight of the batsman and carrier too far out. Modern jets don't suffer this to the same degree, so can come in straighter than the old piston jobs.

    • @dogsnads5634
      @dogsnads5634 4 роки тому

      A lot of that was due to the Corsair. The nose was so long and the attitude of the plane was nose high on landing. The USN didn't like them initially as a result and let the RN and USMC have them, despite the fact that they were the best carrier borne fighter of the war. The RN developed the curved approach to give the pilot a clear view of the deck on the approach. The USN later adopted the same approach when they bought Corsair onboard carriers.

    • @marcuswardle3180
      @marcuswardle3180 4 роки тому +1

      The Americans built the Corsair for carrier landings but found it wasn’t up to the job so used it for land operations. They gave some to us Brits. and we worked out how to land it on a carrier by doing a turning approach. The problem with the Corsair was the big, bloody great engine on the front hindered the view on landing! We also carried out other mods. We raised the pilots seat by seven inches and gave it a bubble canopy. The cowling flaps on the top of the engine were closed shut giving more visibility. One that was unexpected was due to British carriers having a lower ceiling in the aircraft bay they cut the wings tips off. This had the unexpected result that at slow speeds ie. landing speeds, the aircraft would ‘float’. All these small mods. allowed the Corsair to become a carrier aircraft again. We then had to train American pilots how to land planes in a turning approach which they were most appreciative as they thought that it was a great carrier aircraft. P.s. My dad was Fleet Air Arm for a while during WWII.

    • @Nghilifa
      @Nghilifa 2 роки тому

      @@dogsnads5634 That's simply not an accurate statement regarding the approach. Americans were also using a curved approach, as it is required to maintain the required spacing between planes in the landing cycle. Much like today, they aimed for 15-20 seconds in the "groove" before touchdown, doing a straight-in approach would have made that impossible, since they also flew in a racetrack pattern around the ship. The brits modified the Corsair by making the top cowl flaps flush with the fuselage, and taping them shut, so that oil etc wouldn't spill through (this is why you see long stripes of white tape on the cowling on US/UK Corsairs), they also raised the seat by 7 inches, as well as cut off the wingtips (due to hangar deck space/clearance) which also improved the landing characteristics (the Americans didn't do that however). The Americans did however, adopt the cowl-flaps fix, the seat fix as well as installing a blown "malcolm-style" canopy in place of the birdcage style canopy on the F4U-1s, and they also modified the oleo struts so that they didn't bounce nearly as much when landing on the deck. This new model/production-block was named F4U-1a.

  • @jgoodfellow3314
    @jgoodfellow3314 3 роки тому

    Poor batsman, getting a bloody idiot down safely is both physically taxing and mentally frustrating, enjoyed the mosquito landings by group captain Eric Brown, they had to use different props and techniques since the stalling speed was 10 mph higher than the maximum landing speed for the arresting cables for such a heavy aircraft.

  • @westlock
    @westlock 7 років тому +4

    The carrier is very likely HMS _Campania_.

    • @nollix
      @nollix 2 роки тому

      How do you know?

    • @westlock
      @westlock 2 роки тому

      @@nollix She is described as an escort carrier. This video was made a year after the war. Immediately after the war, the RN returned all of its American-built carriers to the USN. Almost all British-built converted carriers were returned to their original owners. The only escort carriers that were retained were the _Nairana_ class. One was transferred to the Dutch Navy. Another was sent to Asia to repatriate POWs. That left _Campania_ as the only remaining escort carrier under RN control in home waters, and therefore available for the production of this video.

  • @nigelmitchell351
    @nigelmitchell351 4 роки тому +1

    I thought all the Corsairs went over the side on the cessation of hostilities.?

    • @stickman3214
      @stickman3214 4 роки тому

      nigel mitchell Nope. That would be a huge waste of military equipment. Only severely damaged aircraft were dumped overboard.

    • @Pitcairn2
      @Pitcairn2 3 роки тому +1

      @@stickman3214 I believe some battle worn Lend Lease Wildcats were dumped after Japan surrendered - the Americans did not want them back.

    • @rossmansell5877
      @rossmansell5877 10 місяців тому +1

      A whole load or aircraft were dumped over the cliff at Hal Far at Malta after the hostilities ceased....

    • @nigelmitchell351
      @nigelmitchell351 10 місяців тому +1

      @@stickman3214 Speaking for the RN, my old dad was a mech in 436 sq, HMS Victorious, he said all Corsairs and associated tools had to go over the side.
      He said news of the atom bomb was the best he ever heard !
      Apologies for the late reply.

  • @Lockbar
    @Lockbar 7 років тому +2

    Wilson was a smart-ass. Would they really have given him a second chance? Also, is that escort carrier a British design, or American Lend-Lease?

    • @KB4QAA
      @KB4QAA 7 років тому +2

      It's a British design carrier.

    • @Peorhum
      @Peorhum 6 років тому +2

      as were many of the ships built in US yards, like LSTs and liberty ships. US ship yard staff helped of course but base designs were British.

    • @johnevans7261
      @johnevans7261 5 років тому +4

      No, Wilson is British and therefore a smart-arse. An ass in proper English is a small donkey.

    • @LV_CRAZY
      @LV_CRAZY 2 роки тому

      @@Peorhum I'm sure Kaiser Shipbuilding took features from existing designs but due to the unique production methods the ship design was Kaiser's alone. The previous "jeep" carriers where conversions, particularly of oilers.

  • @koala_guest_rbx8344
    @koala_guest_rbx8344 6 років тому +1

    19:44 deja vu

  • @billyauk
    @billyauk 6 років тому +4

    Luxury accommodation for a Subbie! :-)

  • @gregtaylor6146
    @gregtaylor6146 4 роки тому +1

    Fabulous stuff ......God save the Queen!

  • @falconeaterf15
    @falconeaterf15 3 роки тому

    Memories of Simpsons Troy McLure.

  • @pauldg837
    @pauldg837 5 років тому +1

    And thirdly this is the island, avoid this at all costs! Sound advice. Lol.

    • @rossmansell5877
      @rossmansell5877 10 місяців тому

      Well a Wyvern did not on HMS Eagel...pilot got away with it when it landed upside down on the deck...He was killed later in a heli prang...

  • @orange70383
    @orange70383 4 роки тому

    Wilson stuffed another sir, bring him here I'm going to give him a good gob-squabble.

  • @fourfortyroadrunner6701
    @fourfortyroadrunner6701 7 років тому

    It would be so helpful if the Brits would learn to speak English LOL. Why does the American Corsair should like a V12? "Watch that" sound dubbing LOL

    • @jameswebb4593
      @jameswebb4593 6 років тому +2

      Before you shout your American mouth off the Royal Navy were landing Corsairs on Carriers a year before the USN.Because the Corsair had such a long nose and poor forward vision the Yanks deemed it too dangerous.

    • @craigie6025
      @craigie6025 6 років тому

      James Webb - how rude!

    • @jameswebb4593
      @jameswebb4593 6 років тому

      Rude ! In what way, telling the truth. The Americans are forever thumping their chest, claiming actions that they only participated in.

    • @austingibson4566
      @austingibson4566 6 років тому

      John France oiiooo(301) 641-5305i ki

    • @xxPROXxx
      @xxPROXxx 6 років тому

      Remember, this is the '40's, audio and video technology was still being improved so i'm sure the mics picked up all that wind... you had no choice.

  • @user-xq3kg8hk5q
    @user-xq3kg8hk5q Рік тому

    Да, Когда-то была Америка❤