i will personally translate ur meanings into chinese, if that is ok, i will try my best, also can i make a friend with you in return? ur awsome. email: haoyang.cai1707@gmail.com
It probably bears mentioning that the Lunar Module's ascent engine was the only propulsion system on Apollo with no backup. The service module engine was originally designed for lifting the CSM off the Moon and was WAY more powerful than it needed to be, so if it failed the Lunar Module's descent engine could do the job instead (as was done on Apollo 13). If the descent engine failed during any phase of the Moon landing, the ascent engine could be used to abort the landing, get back into orbit, and rendezvous with the CSM. But if the _ascent_ engine failed to ignite on the Moon, the astronauts were stuck there forever. Worse, the Ascent Propulsion System had extremely simple plumbing that made it impossible to test-fire, because the corrosive oxidizer would basically destroy the engine in the process. So on every Apollo mission, the ignition of the ascent stage on the Moon was the first time that particular engine had ever been fired. The Bell engineers who built the LM's ascent engine probably had the most stressful job in the whole program.
I'm sure the astronauts were pretty nervous as they prepared to launch off the surface of the moon. That would have been sad to get to the moon but not be able to return home. Thanks for your comment - this is good info!
I heard that Buzz Aldrin accidentally broke off the switch that fired the ascent engine! (Bumped it while wearing his EVA suit.) Had to stick a pen cap in there to make it work. Now THAT would make me sweat.
The other interesting fact about the ascent engine was each engine was assembled and installed without testing it. The corrosive nature of the fuel meant that the engine would have to be rebuilt after firing, so no testing was possible. In other words, the very first time the engine was ever fired was on the ascent module, by the astronauts who were depending on it to get them home. Just a bit of pucker factor.
Hey Jared. I'm 60 years old so obviously old enough to recall moon landings. Always been fascinated to know how they did everything. Your videos do great job walking us through intricacies of moon missions. Thanks for posting these.
I am an aviation and space journalist and I've written a book on this topic some time many years before I discovered your videos. They are the best videos on the topic - by far! Just the the right amount of depth to be very educating, with perfect graphics and text. Congratulations.
I was a (young) engineer on the Apollo launch team at Kennedy for Apollos 4 - 13. This is an excellent series of videos about the missions. Easy to understand graphics. Good job.
I sure wish guys like you could talk some sense into these “the landings were faked” people. They are right up there with the flat earth people with regard to their absolute inability to accept reality.
Wonderful video. As a person who is fascinated by the Apollo 13 story, your video has explained things to me so clearly, I have been looking for such a video for years, thanks a lot.
I did a report on the shuttle US back in 1980 more like a research paper was working on degree in applied science got a A for it but interestingly they never gave me back my paper but in my report i wrote that this. Craft was doomed to failure at some point due to not only its complexity but the fact that this ship was very fragile those boosters an example & just the whole design, structure the materials used the vulnerability to extreme climate made it a ticking time bomb add to the fact that it was expensive to operate & maintain for those reasons were probably why they kept my paper did they think i might let NASA know? & that i was right all along.but they said it was a good report may be too good.will never know.
I am 62 and grew up in the Apollo era. The glory of Apollo 11 and the drama of Apollo 13. This video was most informative and I thank you for posting it.
This has got to be the most concise, informative and enjoyable series of videos about Apollo Lunar missions that I have ever seen. The animations were also impressive. Very well done. Thank you.
The most concise and informative four minute cartoon you ever watched. I can't imagine thinking this was informative or concise. Comical at best is how I see it.
@@shealdedmon7027 Of course you "Can't imagine". Seems you drew the short stick when it came to IQ's. "How I see it" yet you see nothing. A channel for over a year with two subs, your mom, and your dad. At least they believed in you. You probably hate them. There is nothing you have ever done that others cannot do better, besides maybe a video game nobody cares about. But if you actually got educated, your world would open up, and you would end up with many friends that are intelligent. Your lack of belief in what is possible only stems from your own inadequacies. Learn more. Do more. Be more. It is inside of you, and the only one that can stop it, is you. Grow up, read a book, and prosper. Your current state is conducive to nothing. Change it. You are better than you are behaving.
The fade out of each rocket segment as you are explaining the evolution of the mission - brilliant editing. I know just about everything concerning the early years of Nasa’s manned exploration programs, and I can say with certainty that your 3 brief videos would be a welcome teaching aid for the generations to come. Bravo!🏆
Half a million miles...... One lunar landing....... And... 3 UA-cam videos later..... Here I am, an admirer of your videos, content, presentation, narration and what more....! Kudos Jared... It is time I take the next ride on the Appollo Spacecraft with my 9 year old son... He is ready to understand much of it - thanks to you!
If you think it was difficult 60 years ago, imagine doing it now. Too bad we don't have 1960s rocket tech and 1960s cameras so we can go to moon again am I right? Today we also have to account for the deadly van allen radiation belt. Something that was conveniently ignored in the 60s and this video
@@johnf817 Stop doing drugs, bruh. As a musician there are certain microphones made in the 60's that cannot be replicated today. Tech gets lost when not used. That's a fact. Cars used to last many decades, but with "Modern tech" in a couple of years they break. You have zero clue what you are saying. Again, stay off the drugs.
I worked on the Saturn V and this is the best video explanation I've seen. I worked on the Instrument Unit which was the brains of the Saturn V. It was built by IBM under a contract with NASA in Huntsville, AL. The IU had all the navigation, guidance, telemetry, communications, etc. functions through Trans Lunar Injection. At the IBM facility where I worked, there were posters urging everyone to work with Zero Defects. Another poster with a quote by Wehner von Braun explained why: "If the Saturn V is 99.9% reliable, there will be 5,600 defects." I did some calculations recently and a typical cell phone these days has about 3.5 million times the storage capacity of the Saturn V IU and computer processors have about 1 trillion times the processing capability of processors in the 1960s. It is amazing to reflect on how primitive computers were back then and how we got to the Moon with such limited capabilities.
You’re such a legend for working on that absolute beauty of a rocket. My heroes are the men and women who built that rocket. So this then makes you one of my heroes, Mr. Everett. Thanks for sharing with us!
.1% = 5,600 ………. That is mind blowing! Every single individual piece , every “insignificant” wire, rivet or nut, had to be as good as humans could make it. Amazing.
So just purchased the Lego Saturn V model, and wanted to go over how they actually did it - these three videos were absolutely brilliant, learnt new procedures, names and loved it! Thank you
2:00 I can't even imagine the enormous proud and satisfaction those astronauts were feeling for those 3 days. This is amazing ❤️ Thanks Jared for making these videos 👍👍
Jay, hope you got to tour the ship's bridge (wheel house) and below deck crew quarters. I am kinda spoiled that I live about a half hour from Alameda and visited it several times.
IDK if it's been mentioned, but the crew did leave the CM on the way back to Earth. There were film canisters in the SM, and the CMP would spacewalk to retrieve them. Kind of a consolation prize for not walking on the moon.
This didn't happen until Apollo 15, Al Worden was the first, followed by Mattingly and Evans. Collins, Gordon, (obviously Swigert), and Roosa did not perform one.
It is not just the animations that are remarkable--the narration quality and information content are also remarkable. This is the first rendering I have seen of what the rendezvous orbits looked like.
My 3 year old son is fascinated with space. Your videos are the only ones that seem to capture his attention, and I have learnt SO much watching them with him. They are unlike anything else I have found on UA-cam. Thankyou so much for your efforts.
Thanks for this. I grew up with the Apollo missions. As a young schoolboy I was there for the moon landings and the suspense of Apollo 13. Great history lesson my friend.
Great video, thank you. The whole lunar landing is just mindblowing. The complexity and the challenges that had to be overcome, and the risks involved are insane and it would be impossible to do in today's world. Hats off to everyone involved.
Thanks so much for all the videos you make. You do such a good job with the animations. I really enjoyed your space travel videos because I’m learning about rocket science and space travel
So many varying factors, stages, and series of events that had to work perfectly. Too many things that can go wrong at different times. Amazing all of this worked.
Yes and a big reason why robotic missions are the preferred method of space exploration. Space travel is outrageously expensive and manned space travel is grotesquely outrageously expensive. Now that two shuttle crews have been killed, the need for safety in manned missions might just be too overwhelming for NASA and whomever is in office at the time to actually get anymore of them done but time will tell.
All three videos were really amazing and I got a lot to learn about the Apollo Mission. Thanks for making the matter easy by excellent graphics and animation. Now, I wanna request you to make a video on the Mars Orbiter Mission of India which made ISRO proud before the whole world for being the first country to successfully land on Mars in the first attempt.
I already knew about all this because my dad was an electronics technician on the second stage of all the Saturn v's that went to the moon. Jared was correct on everything he spoke of except one minor thing, the LEM stood for "Lunar Excursion Module." Good job, Jared and thanks for helping to keep this part of history alive!
Just to flesh it out, the 2/3 engine burns after launch from the moon were called: Coelliptic Sequence Initiate (CSI) - 1st engine burn Constant Delta Height (CDH) - 2nd engine burn, or 1st on the later missions Terminal Phase Initiate (TPI) - 3rd engine burn, or 2nd on the later missions These 3 burns were computed backwards, starting from the desired point where you want the LM to meet up with the CSM (which was at lunar sunrise) and working your way back to the desired launch time. Vaguely, purpose of the CSI burn was to put the spacecraft in position for the CDH burn. purpose of the CDH burn was to put the spacecraft in position for the TPI burn. purpose of the TPI burn was to have the LM and CSM meet up at a specific point in orbit. Later missions skipped the CSI burn as the LM was launched directly to the proper orbit for CDH to take place. This was called a "direct insertion" launch. Jeff Quitney has a video at ua-cam.com/video/UOnKHX1p8s4/v-deo.html detailing the process of getting the LM back to the CSM in orbit.
But that just brings you to the right hight, at the correct time, but how did they manage to be on the same (sorry not a native english speaker)trajectory, and not say 20 Miles to the left or right, or not even on the same perpendicular path.
Yeah, I find it stupid how people think that because the computer and technology was hundreds of times less advanced than now that they say "hOw thEy gO tO mOOn iF coMpUtEr noT goOD?". The computers were designed specifically to get them on the moon. Our phones may be more powerful but they aren't made to get man on the moon, they are simply programmed to entertain us.
Thank you for your time and effort in preparing these excellent videos about the Apollo missions! I lived the Apollo 11 landing live on TV in 1969, and only with the help of some specialised newsmagazine of the time, I was able to understand what I was seeing. Everybody now can benefit from your highly explanatory video animations! Again, thanks...
...Mr. Armstrong said it incorrectly though...picking on him, of course...he missed the 'a' before 'man'. So, technically, it was an incorrect grammar for spoken English. :)
Wish u had been able to do this at the actual event! We had to follow Walter Cronkite using toy models. But worth it to hear Neal say “Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed.” in real time!
We did make it. You taught me so much in the last 15 minutes really clear precise information. Thank you. Great videos these will be shared on moon hoax sites.
thanks for great video and i looked for comments and i see that a lot of people doesnt know about how nasa went for moon, i believe thats why people still talking about conspiracy theories. people just informed about “yes we went to moon that should you need to know” and thats wrong. these type of videos makes these subjects more understandable as a aeronautics and space engineer thanks for that GREAT work
Paul Snape I thought great work in the video , but just because some of us doubt and question the nasa evidence of man on the moon doesn’t change the phenomenol engineering of space flight or make us all hoax nuts , there are some legitimate doubtful claims in the space race in relation to manned landings
Pretty sure most people who doubt the moon landings could be flown up to the moon, have their head bounced off the LM decent stage and would still not believe it. They start talking about how it was put there later and we didn't actually go in the 60s and everything is just an elusion and we all live in the matrix. At some point you have to take into account the overwhelming mountain of edvidence that points to the fact it did happen and stop focusing on some minute thing that can neither be proven nor disproved.
Paul Sharpe: Hi guy! Tell me where I am wrong and provide evidence: Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videos of stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radar stations on the moon to verify the unknown orbit of the fake CMS, and the ignition time of the LEM, and track the fake LEMs altitude and range as a function of time for descent and ascent. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane, but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.
With the latest DLC one can make a pretty realistic looking Saturn 5 replica. I did this the other day, but I ditched the 3 ascent stage as it simply wasn't necessary and would have made the rocket unnecessarily complex, maybe the engines in KSP are too efficient. :P
Yep. Though when I try to dock the csm head to head with the lm to "pull it out," as it says in the 2nd video, I always forget to turn off the shroud option for the csm rocket engine, so it always blocks me when I try to dock and it sends the lm flipping around like crazy.
@@loserx8910 I would not say ksp is unrealistic because it uses a different solar system. It is still a game and it would not be fun or beginner friendly to use the real scale and minmus is a good addition as second moon because you can use it to learn interplanetary missions. And if you want the real earth there are mods
@@anltube35935 The massive balls from the astronauts, to leave planet earth by not only going into the orbit. i dont even know until today, how those giant balls fitted in the saturn 5
HI! We are a group of 2nd and 3rd grade students who LOVE science and LOVE your videos! Thank you so much for making them! We all LOVED your videos- thank you for teaching us about rocket stages.- Liam I am very impressed with the research that you have done. - Landon How did you learn so much about space and rockets? I want to learn all about space and rockets also! - Lily I like your videos very much. I feel like you would be a really cool friend to have. I wish you lived nearby. - Isaac L. I LOVE the way you made the graphics look so real. The science is so interesting, but you made it even more interesting! - Annabella I like how you showed us how the stages were broken into 3 parts. - Daniel Thank you for sharing this video with everybody. - Coral Please make more rocket science videos! - Olivia Will you make a video about Apollo 13? - Sonya Your videos are interesting and fun to watch. - Lailah Lots of us are thinking about going into different aspects of rocket science now that we saw your videos! THANK YOU SO MUCH! - Sincerely ROOM 9
Hi Everyone - Thank you for your kind words! This brought a smile to my face as I read all of your comments. I will be making more videos soon about rockets and maybe more about the Apollo spacecraft! Thanks again for watching my videos
re entry started at 400,000 feet came down to about 200,000 rotated the craft 180" went back up 50,000 feet to cool the heat shield then rotated another 180" and started again to the sea. there is video on UA-cam that shows the re entry from an aircraft the fireball is 50 miles long.
it was called a lifting re entry as the command module was in essence a lifting body so as you correctly explained by altering its angle it could gain lift and perform these stepped re -entry's
Wow! (1) WOW! (2) ***WOW***! (3) I have always been fascinated by the Apollo program, I was a kid when it happened, and I gobbled up all the information I could find. But this is such an EXCELLENT way to tell the story! I feel like I flew the whole mission, inside and out! Thank you! Outstanding stuff!
I've been a huge fan of the Apollo Missions since watching the A11 landing 'live on scratchy TV' as a kid. You answered all my questions on the fascinating 'tech specs' of how things worked with these three AMAZINGLY well put together vids. Excellent job Jared Owen.... and thank you. You deserve more views.
Mr. Jared Owen, sir, that was such an informative video presentation. Indeed Sir Owen. I now appreciated more. I was in 4th grade when all this stuff went down, & we all knew the Astronaut's names. Every kid in my neighborhood knew who they all were, along with who was the Heavyweight Champion of the World. You sound still like a young man Sir Owen. You represent what right in your generation. Continue to learn & teach....
With all this attention to technical detail the final part where we enter Earth's atmosphere feels a little light.. No mention of the trajectory and the small "window" they had.. Not to steep and not to flat or they burn up on re-entry or skip of the atmosphere back out in to space..
They dont skip into space. The return entry angle of the CSM entering the atmosphere can be such that lift is created. There can be enough lift and speed to put it back into orbit longer than the amount of oxygen they have available. The window is not that small. It was well within the capability of a typical aircraft autopilot at the time. Nice video presentation but the reality is nobody went to the moon, particularly with a 1960s computer... Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videos of stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radar stations on the moon to verify the unknown orbit of the fake CMS, and the ignition time of the LEM, and track the fake LEMs altitude and range as a function of time for descent and ascent. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane, but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.
@@suekennedy8917 Well okay, but at least we're certain we put Apollo 11 through 17 up into space, at least, right? So, if we didn't go to the moon, what were we really up to, up there?
Just a little info I picked up on the ascent stage on the LM: the engine was never tested on Earth, and its fire up or ignition was its first initial run. It was basically a clean engine up to the required use. Apollo 11, and the engineers on Earth, had a dramatic countdown once Neil and Buzz were getting ready to return. On top of that, Buzz broke the one ignition switch during their short stay on the Moon’s surface. They actually used the tip of a pen to fire up the engine.
Just wanted to point out that they did have some redundancy with important controls and electrical systems. If the pen fix hadn't worked, there were people on the ground already working on another solution with the electrical system although I can't remember the details. The built in redundancy NASA insisted upon was a big reason why Grumman was having a difficult time keeping the weight of the LM within the tight guidelines.
Saber Tig: Nobody went to the moon, particularly with a 1960s computer and changing second moment with 4 groups of constant force steering motors... Knowing how to evaluate evidence, or lack of evidence, is a good first step to revealing what a hoax it is. Having an engineering degree is helpful but not necessary to know what questions to ask or find huge inconsistencies in the moon hoax. Big problem for them is what were graduate level courses in the 1950s and 1960s are now undergrad courses, so there is not much of a mystery to use undergrad courses to ask questions they cant or dont want to answer.... Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videos of stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radar stations on the moon to verify the unknown orbit of the fake CSM, and the ignition time of the LEM, and track the fake LEMs altitude and range as a function of time for descent and ascent. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane, but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.
Actually everything was planned by the engineers. The astronauts just had to follow the steps that the engineers have given to them. So huge respect to the engineers back then.
USA,USA,USA,USA,🇺🇸👍🇺🇸 , THANK YOU GREAT, GREAT VIDEO AMERICANS STRONGLY PROUD OF THIS COUNTRY, HAVE A GREAT DAY AMERICA MAY GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 🇺🇸✌🇺🇸
The problem that will have to be solved that wasn't required for a moon landing is Mars gravity. Although it's about 38 percent that of earth, it's still a lot stronger than the moon's. Everything will be heavier, so lifting back off the moon will require much bigger engines and a lot more fuel.
Among several issues that will need to be adressed, this one will be hard. When astronauts come back on earth after 6 month in the ISS, they are unable to stand or walk by themselves and need to be assisted for the time they readapt to the earth gravity. Despite the physical training they get in orbit. Now imagine them on the Mars surface, after a year without gravity, suddenly undergoing a .38 G environment. Who will welcome them and give them assistance. Do you think they will be able to work and perform?
"Once we're back in earth orbit, the service module is no longer needed." The Apollo's that came back from the moon did not return to earth orbit. They followed a 11.2 km/s direct entry approach with an atmospheric tangent of around 96 km in altitude. Fifteen minutes or around 10,000 km prior to reaching the point of tangency, the command module shed the service module which was no longer needed.
I don't have words to appreciate your hard work for these videos which clearly shows complete procedure about how Apollo missions have carried out. Great job boss, thanks for your valuable work.
Oreo BoomBeach That my friend is an oxymoron. You have no brain. You have no business exchanging ideas with the people posting here because you are intellectually crippled. Please go watch TMZ
What sort of computer equipment did they have in 1969? The Lunar Module and Command Module rendezvoused withOUT a computer guidance system, just with Michael Collins's eyesight? Bullshit!
I watched Apollo 11 as a young kid, it still boggles me that all this was accomplished while very much still in the era of the slide rule. Thanks for the memory jog.
Help me subtitle this video in your language:
ua-cam.com/users/timedtext_video?v=qt_xoCXLXnI&ref=share
i will personally translate ur meanings into chinese, if that is ok, i will try my best, also can i make a friend with you in return? ur awsome. email: haoyang.cai1707@gmail.com
hope you appreciate it
Great work...
You should do remake for half-century anniversary (and include few missed details)...
Good luck!
Why does your videos have to be so short
I did in swahili you can review it
It probably bears mentioning that the Lunar Module's ascent engine was the only propulsion system on Apollo with no backup. The service module engine was originally designed for lifting the CSM off the Moon and was WAY more powerful than it needed to be, so if it failed the Lunar Module's descent engine could do the job instead (as was done on Apollo 13). If the descent engine failed during any phase of the Moon landing, the ascent engine could be used to abort the landing, get back into orbit, and rendezvous with the CSM.
But if the _ascent_ engine failed to ignite on the Moon, the astronauts were stuck there forever. Worse, the Ascent Propulsion System had extremely simple plumbing that made it impossible to test-fire, because the corrosive oxidizer would basically destroy the engine in the process. So on every Apollo mission, the ignition of the ascent stage on the Moon was the first time that particular engine had ever been fired. The Bell engineers who built the LM's ascent engine probably had the most stressful job in the whole program.
I'm sure the astronauts were pretty nervous as they prepared to launch off the surface of the moon. That would have been sad to get to the moon but not be able to return home. Thanks for your comment - this is good info!
CountArtha Fucks thats crazy to think about...just three men stuck in the moon
I heard that Buzz Aldrin accidentally broke off the switch that fired the ascent engine! (Bumped it while wearing his EVA suit.) Had to stick a pen cap in there to make it work. Now THAT would make me sweat.
The other interesting fact about the ascent engine was each engine was assembled and installed without testing it. The corrosive nature of the fuel meant that the engine would have to be rebuilt after firing, so no testing was possible. In other words, the very first time the engine was ever fired was on the ascent module, by the astronauts who were depending on it to get them home. Just a bit of pucker factor.
Yea right! LMAO Jared you are a genius, but this is one of the many great hoaxes of the 20th century!
Hey Jared. I'm 60 years old so obviously old enough to recall moon landings. Always been fascinated to know how they did everything. Your videos do great job walking us through intricacies of moon missions. Thanks for posting these.
Nobody said it...
The animations are amazing!
Cycling Cycles totally. Add to that, the editing was done well. It looked like live footage was cut the way the best editors do
Yes
I am an aviation and space journalist and I've written a book on this topic some time many years before I discovered your videos. They are the best videos on the topic - by far! Just the the right amount of depth to be very educating, with perfect graphics and text. Congratulations.
😁
I was a (young) engineer on the Apollo launch team at Kennedy for Apollos 4 - 13. This is an excellent series of videos about the missions. Easy to understand graphics. Good job.
I sure wish guys like you could talk some sense into these “the landings were faked” people. They are right up there with the flat earth people with regard to their absolute inability to accept reality.
what are the chances
@@yutrewoyaGD like 30%
Lets forget about Apollo I
Woah
Wonderful video. As a person who is fascinated by the Apollo 13 story, your video has explained things to me so clearly, I have been looking for such a video for years, thanks a lot.
Play kerbal space program. You will understand and start to hate these processes.
ALT + F12
done
SuperDboy4, Hahahahaha you can hyperedit tho.
Robert M. Cheat much
Well but Apollo 13's crews are lucky guys. back to earth with moon lander!
how space shuttle works please make a video
you are amazing
YES!!
I did a report on the shuttle US back in 1980 more like a research paper was working on degree in applied science got a A for it but interestingly they never gave me back my paper but in my report i wrote that this. Craft was doomed to failure at some point due to not only its complexity but the fact that this ship was very fragile those boosters an example & just the whole design, structure the materials used the vulnerability to extreme climate made it a ticking time bomb add to the fact that it was expensive to operate & maintain for those reasons were probably why they kept my paper did they think i might let NASA know? & that i was right all along.but they said it was a good report may be too good.will never know.
@@ndhzbhhdhhs668 I wouldn't trust a report that was written by a guy named Ndhzb Hhdhhs and has not-so-good grammar.
Yes do and explain how constant force supersonic nozzles control a mass m of inertia I about its mass center.
Ndhzb Hhdhhs r/thathappened
I am 62 and grew up in the Apollo era. The glory of Apollo 11 and the drama of Apollo 13. This video was most informative and I thank you for posting it.
This has got to be the most concise, informative and enjoyable series of videos about Apollo Lunar missions that I have ever seen. The animations were also impressive. Very well done. Thank you.
Thank you Gopher! I appreciate your comment
The most concise and informative four minute cartoon you ever watched. I can't imagine thinking this was informative or concise. Comical at best is how I see it.
@@shealdedmon7027 Of course you "Can't imagine". Seems you drew the short stick when it came to IQ's. "How I see it" yet you see nothing. A channel for over a year with two subs, your mom, and your dad. At least they believed in you. You probably hate them. There is nothing you have ever done that others cannot do better, besides maybe a video game nobody cares about. But if you actually got educated, your world would open up, and you would end up with many friends that are intelligent. Your lack of belief in what is possible only stems from your own inadequacies. Learn more. Do more. Be more. It is inside of you, and the only one that can stop it, is you. Grow up, read a book, and prosper. Your current state is conducive to nothing. Change it. You are better than you are behaving.
The fade out of each rocket segment as you are explaining the evolution of the mission - brilliant editing. I know just about everything concerning the early years of Nasa’s manned exploration programs, and I can say with certainty that your 3 brief videos would be a welcome teaching aid for the generations to come. Bravo!🏆
Nice, clear, to the point. I learned more here in a few minutes with these 3 vids than most other vids about Apollo and Saturn 5
Half a million miles......
One lunar landing.......
And... 3 UA-cam videos later.....
Here I am, an admirer of your videos, content, presentation, narration and what more....!
Kudos Jared... It is time I take the next ride on the Appollo Spacecraft with my 9 year old son... He is ready to understand much of it - thanks to you!
What a great series! I can't imagine how difficult this was to pull of in the 60s
If you think it was difficult 60 years ago, imagine doing it now. Too bad we don't have 1960s rocket tech and 1960s cameras so we can go to moon again am I right? Today we also have to account for the deadly van allen radiation belt. Something that was conveniently ignored in the 60s and this video
@@johnf817 www.nasa.gov/specials/artemis/
@@johnf817 Stop doing drugs, bruh. As a musician there are certain microphones made in the 60's that cannot be replicated today. Tech gets lost when not used. That's a fact. Cars used to last many decades, but with "Modern tech" in a couple of years they break. You have zero clue what you are saying. Again, stay off the drugs.
I worked on the Saturn V and this is the best video explanation I've seen. I worked on the Instrument Unit which was the brains of the Saturn V. It was built by IBM under a contract with NASA in Huntsville, AL. The IU had all the navigation, guidance, telemetry, communications, etc. functions through Trans Lunar Injection. At the IBM facility where I worked, there were posters urging everyone to work with Zero Defects. Another poster with a quote by Wehner von Braun explained why: "If the Saturn V is 99.9% reliable, there will be 5,600 defects."
I did some calculations recently and a typical cell phone these days has about 3.5 million times the storage capacity of the Saturn V IU and computer processors have about 1 trillion times the processing capability of processors in the 1960s.
It is amazing to reflect on how primitive computers were back then and how we got to the Moon with such limited capabilities.
Thanks Everett - that's neat that you actually got to work on it!
Crayfi
You’re such a legend for working on that absolute beauty of a rocket. My heroes are the men and women who built that rocket. So this then makes you one of my heroes, Mr. Everett. Thanks for sharing with us!
.1% = 5,600 ………. That is mind blowing! Every single individual piece , every “insignificant” wire, rivet or nut, had to be as good as humans could make it. Amazing.
I WATCHED ALL OF THIS LIVE IN THE 60's AN70's..like many kids i was glued to the tv...you'r videos are great--very well done..
What a marvel of engineering these missions were!
My father in law worked on the Apollo capsule!
He has wonderful stories, and even still has the tools he used during that time.
absolutely amazing work, jared! it’s so unfortunate that not more people see your work.
Thanks!
It burned up in the atmosphere
People like you are the best thing available on the internet. Way to spend time productively.
What a wonderful channel! I learn so much from it. And such a high quality. Thanks you!
So just purchased the Lego Saturn V model, and wanted to go over how they actually did it - these three videos were absolutely brilliant, learnt new procedures, names and loved it! Thank you
have you tried Kerbal Space Program? Its a great game and you learn more in dept things about rockets.
Nah, Spaceflight Simulator is much more simpler and easy to play.
LOL me too, this got me started doing UA-cam searches. This one was great. The kit was a fun build!
Did you know the LEGO set has 1969 pieces? The year Saturn V launched
This is the best explanation I've ever seen. UA-cam can remove all the other space videos now.
But what about the NASA videos?
Spritey remove them too this is simpler
2:00 I can't even imagine the enormous proud and satisfaction those astronauts were feeling for those 3 days.
This is amazing ❤️
Thanks Jared for making these videos 👍👍
Imagine the relief when they splashed down! I imagine it would feel like a million pounds being lifted off of your shoulders.
@@cooperharris136 Absolutely
Your animations are unequaled. Thank you for a superb explanation of lunar landings.
I was aboard the USS Hornet What a once in a lifetime experience. Jay Moore
Neat!
Jay, hope you got to tour the ship's bridge (wheel house) and below deck crew quarters. I am kinda spoiled that I live about a half hour from Alameda and visited it several times.
Awesome, man!
Tell us more please!
Wow the hornet was the one to retrieve ???? I spent the night on the hornet during Boy Scouts in the SF Bay Area !!
Jared, these are outSTANDING vids! Graphics, narration, articulation, information-excellence!
IDK if it's been mentioned, but the crew did leave the CM on the way back to Earth. There were film canisters in the SM, and the CMP would spacewalk to retrieve them. Kind of a consolation prize for not walking on the moon.
This didn't happen until Apollo 15, Al Worden was the first, followed by Mattingly and Evans. Collins, Gordon, (obviously Swigert), and Roosa did not perform one.
Wow! Extremely well done. Thanks so much for taking time to create and share this great illustration.
Jared, I enjoy learning about the Apollo missions to the Moon and must admit that these are the best videos on the topic - by far! Excellent job!
It is not just the animations that are remarkable--the narration quality and information content are also remarkable. This is the first rendering I have seen of what the rendezvous orbits looked like.
My 3 year old son is fascinated with space. Your videos are the only ones that seem to capture his attention, and I have learnt SO much watching them with him. They are unlike anything else I have found on UA-cam. Thankyou so much for your efforts.
Future astronaut... 👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
Don't forget to tell him that on three missions, the Command Module pilot did an EVA halfway between Moon and Earth!
Astronauts were great engineers themselves.
The spirit of the mariners.
This animation is amazing!
Thanks for this. I grew up with the Apollo missions. As a young schoolboy I was there for the moon landings and the suspense of Apollo 13. Great history lesson my friend.
Great video, thank you. The whole lunar landing is just mindblowing. The complexity and the challenges that had to be overcome, and the risks involved are insane and it would be impossible to do in today's world. Hats off to everyone involved.
absolute brilliant engineering and such well thought out, i praise these scientists and engineers who made this possible
I agree!
Why is a 1080ti commenting on youtube
@@salade2760 lmao
3:15 Thought I had a tab open with free science lessons playing!
Thanks so much for all the videos you make. You do such a good job with the animations. I really enjoyed your space travel videos because I’m learning about rocket science and space travel
I grew up watching those space explorations. It was a great time to be a kid. Schools stopped classes to watch the launches. Thank you for this video.
So many varying factors, stages, and series of events that had to work perfectly. Too many things that can go wrong at different times. Amazing all of this worked.
Yes and a big reason why robotic missions are the preferred method of space exploration. Space travel is outrageously expensive and manned space travel is grotesquely outrageously expensive. Now that two shuttle crews have been killed, the need for safety in manned missions might just be too overwhelming for NASA and whomever is in office at the time to actually get anymore of them done but time will tell.
All three videos were really amazing and I got a lot to learn about the Apollo Mission. Thanks for making the matter easy by excellent graphics and animation. Now, I wanna request you to make a video on the Mars Orbiter Mission of India which made ISRO proud before the whole world for being the first country to successfully land on Mars in the first attempt.
Thanks Jared
Im so proud for all the people behind the Apollo mission....hands down!!! Very very genius👏👏👏👏
I already knew about all this because my dad was an electronics technician on the second stage of all the Saturn v's that went to the moon. Jared was correct on everything he spoke of except one minor thing, the LEM stood for "Lunar Excursion Module." Good job, Jared and thanks for helping to keep this part of history alive!
That was amazing. Probably THE best short explanation of the Apollo 11 mission I've ever seen. Well done. 👏
Just to flesh it out, the 2/3 engine burns after launch from the moon were called:
Coelliptic Sequence Initiate (CSI) - 1st engine burn
Constant Delta Height (CDH) - 2nd engine burn, or 1st on the later missions
Terminal Phase Initiate (TPI) - 3rd engine burn, or 2nd on the later missions
These 3 burns were computed backwards, starting from the desired point where you want the LM to meet up with the CSM (which was at lunar sunrise) and working your way back to the desired launch time.
Vaguely,
purpose of the CSI burn was to put the spacecraft in position for the CDH burn.
purpose of the CDH burn was to put the spacecraft in position for the TPI burn.
purpose of the TPI burn was to have the LM and CSM meet up at a specific point in orbit.
Later missions skipped the CSI burn as the LM was launched directly to the proper orbit for CDH to take place. This was called a "direct insertion" launch.
Jeff Quitney has a video at ua-cam.com/video/UOnKHX1p8s4/v-deo.html detailing the process of getting the LM back to the CSM in orbit.
But that just brings you to the right hight, at the correct time, but how did they manage to be on the same (sorry not a native english speaker)trajectory, and not say 20 Miles to the left or right, or not even on the same perpendicular path.
ytwos1,
m.ua-cam.com/video/e8L2rIoVMY4/v-deo.html
This is an absolutely amazing video series and the animation is epic.
Amazing how all this was done with technology and computers that were far less powerful than the average smartphone nowadays.
The truly powerful computers were inside the skulls of the engineers.
You don't need stinkin' computers when you've got sliderules!!!
Yeah, I find it stupid how people think that because the computer and technology was hundreds of times less advanced than now that they say "hOw thEy gO tO mOOn iF coMpUtEr noT goOD?". The computers were designed specifically to get them on the moon. Our phones may be more powerful but they aren't made to get man on the moon, they are simply programmed to entertain us.
@@salt5605 i like your pfp
@@redshark9537 yeah !
Thank you for your time and effort in preparing these excellent videos about the Apollo missions!
I lived the Apollo 11 landing live on TV in 1969, and only with the help of some specialised newsmagazine of the time, I was able to understand what I was seeing. Everybody now can benefit from your highly explanatory video animations! Again, thanks...
Wonderful series! Thank you Jared Owen.
"A small step for a man and a giant leap for mankind." - Neil Armstrong
...Mr. Armstrong said it incorrectly though...picking on him, of course...he missed the 'a' before 'man'. So, technically, it was an incorrect grammar for spoken English. :)
Fahad Faisal that’s oof
*thats one small step for man, one giant leap for the mankind - Neil Armstrong
@@fahadfaisal7855 no he said A man but you can't hear it because of the bad quality
A giant Fake Show,no more!
Wish u had been able to do this at the actual event! We had to follow Walter Cronkite using toy models. But worth it to hear Neal say “Tranquility Base here. The Eagle has landed.” in real time!
Hit the upthumb at the 1 second mark, you know it's good content. Thanks for this!
bfjb70 up thumb? Ur so British
Bruh it’s called the thumbs up or like button
@@davester5234 Said the guy with zero upthumbs. Sixteen and counting bruh. Ohhh yeah.
Wow, Incredible animations. The way you explain these videos is just superb. Amazing work Jared. You are the man.
Such clear representation and simpler explanation and the best one so far!
Thanks Kiran
We did make it. You taught me so much in the last 15 minutes really clear precise information. Thank you. Great videos these will be shared on moon hoax sites.
thanks for great video and i looked for comments and i see that a lot of people doesnt know about how nasa went for moon, i believe thats why people still talking about conspiracy theories. people just informed about “yes we went to moon that should you need to know” and thats wrong. these type of videos makes these subjects more understandable as a aeronautics and space engineer thanks for that GREAT work
Great set of videos, superbly broken down and simplified - should be required viewing for all hoaxnuts!!
Paul Snape I thought great work in the video , but just because some of us doubt and question the nasa evidence of man on the moon doesn’t change the phenomenol engineering of space flight or make us all hoax nuts , there are some legitimate doubtful claims in the space race in relation to manned landings
Pretty sure most people who doubt the moon landings could be flown up to the moon, have their head bounced off the LM decent stage and would still not believe it.
They start talking about how it was put there later and we didn't actually go in the 60s and everything is just an elusion and we all live in the matrix.
At some point you have to take into account the overwhelming mountain of edvidence that points to the fact it did happen and stop focusing on some minute thing that can neither be proven nor disproved.
God, no, we don’t need their kind around here..l
Nope. Good day.
Paul Sharpe: Hi guy! Tell me where I am wrong and provide evidence:
Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in
the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videos of stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radar stations on the moon to verify the unknown orbit of the fake CMS, and the ignition time of the LEM, and track the fake LEMs altitude and range as a function of time for descent and ascent. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane, but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.
Absolutely brilliant animation. I was 10 years old when Apollo 11 took place. Been hooked ever since. These 3 videos are outstanding. Thank You.
Beautifully explained.
You can understand more about these process by doing kerbal space program.
With the latest DLC one can make a pretty realistic looking Saturn 5 replica. I did this the other day, but I ditched the 3 ascent stage as it simply wasn't necessary and would have made the rocket unnecessarily complex, maybe the engines in KSP are too efficient. :P
Yep. Though when I try to dock the csm head to head with the lm to "pull it out," as it says in the 2nd video, I always forget to turn off the shroud option for the csm rocket engine, so it always blocks me when I try to dock and it sends the lm flipping around like crazy.
@@hakont.4960 Ksp is pretty unrealistic, earths gravity is smaller and last time i checked earth doesnt have 2 moons.
@@loserx8910 I would not say ksp is unrealistic because it uses a different solar system. It is still a game and it would not be fun or beginner friendly to use the real scale and minmus is a good addition as second moon because you can use it to learn interplanetary missions. And if you want the real earth there are mods
Don’t ruin perfect likes
-The final part of all missions, splashdown.
Elon musk- I’m about to end this mans hole career.
What's your point? I'm genuinely curious
No
*whole
Sorry
@@AED10 starship.
I think the hardest part is rendezvous and docking, it must be accurate when combining two giant objets.
And having those massive Balls to get out there
@@scuida2730 What is the massive Balls ?
@@anltube35935 The massive balls from the astronauts, to leave planet earth by not only going into the orbit. i dont even know until today, how those giant balls fitted in the saturn 5
Jared GREAT JOB !!! I love these videos I saw it on TV but your work shows it in a way I can show my children! Thank you so much. Keep it up.
Thank you very much for the three parts of wonderful moon lander explanation 👍
my teacher made me and my class watch all 3 very fun
Can you make a video about what happened on Apollo 13? I would really like to know what exactly went wrong.
Great suggestion - I will make sure this is on my list
Jared Owen OMG YOU ACTUALLY SAW THIS i am a huge fan!
HI! We are a group of 2nd and 3rd grade students who LOVE science and LOVE your videos! Thank you so much for making them!
We all LOVED your videos- thank you for teaching us about rocket stages.- Liam
I am very impressed with the research that you have done. - Landon
How did you learn so much about space and rockets? I want to learn all about space and rockets also! - Lily
I like your videos very much. I feel like you would be a really cool friend to have. I wish you lived nearby. - Isaac L.
I LOVE the way you made the graphics look so real. The science is so interesting, but you made it even more interesting! - Annabella
I like how you showed us how the stages were broken into 3 parts. - Daniel
Thank you for sharing this video with everybody. - Coral
Please make more rocket science videos! - Olivia
Will you make a video about Apollo 13? - Sonya
Your videos are interesting and fun to watch. - Lailah
Lots of us are thinking about going into different aspects of rocket science now that we saw your videos! THANK YOU SO MUCH! - Sincerely ROOM 9
Hi Everyone - Thank you for your kind words! This brought a smile to my face as I read all of your comments. I will be making more videos soon about rockets and maybe more about the Apollo spacecraft! Thanks again for watching my videos
Best & superb explanation of apollo mission...these videos have amazingly cleared my concept of space!!!
Very well simplified and captivating to watch. I watched all the parts, thanx
2:26 in case you were wondering why reusable spaceships are such a big deal
re entry started at 400,000 feet came down to about 200,000 rotated the craft 180" went back up 50,000 feet to cool the heat shield then rotated another 180" and started again to the sea. there is video on UA-cam that shows the re entry from an aircraft the fireball is 50 miles long.
Seriously? That's amazing! What's the name of the video?
it was called a lifting re entry as the command module was in essence a lifting body so as you correctly explained by altering its angle it could gain lift and perform these stepped
re -entry's
Just perfect. I will show it to my kids, which are betoween 18 and 21 years old. Tank you gentleman.
Wow! (1) WOW! (2) ***WOW***! (3) I have always been fascinated by the Apollo program, I was a kid when it happened, and I gobbled up all the information I could find. But this is such an EXCELLENT way to tell the story! I feel like I flew the whole mission, inside and out! Thank you! Outstanding stuff!
This is how my parents say they went to school everyday.
the only reason im watching this because I wanna build this on Space Flight Simulator
Good luck.
Well the reason for me is that how do i land on moon and doing the docking kind of stuff
Hahaha same here
The fact they did this with computers slower than a calculator, just blows my mind !
🤔
I've been a huge fan of the Apollo Missions since watching the A11 landing 'live on scratchy TV' as a kid.
You answered all my questions on the fascinating 'tech specs' of how things worked with these three AMAZINGLY well put together vids.
Excellent job Jared Owen.... and thank you. You deserve more views.
Mr. Jared Owen, sir, that was such an informative video presentation. Indeed Sir Owen. I now appreciated more. I was in 4th grade when all this stuff went down, & we all knew the Astronaut's names. Every kid in my neighborhood knew who they all were, along with who was the Heavyweight Champion of the World. You sound still like a young man Sir Owen. You represent what right in your generation. Continue to learn & teach....
With all this attention to technical detail the final part where we enter Earth's atmosphere feels a little light.. No mention of the trajectory and the small "window" they had.. Not to steep and not to flat or they burn up on re-entry or skip of the atmosphere back out in to space..
... I almost forgot to complement you on the otherwise fine animations series.. Nice work.
Thanks!
They dont skip into space. The return entry angle of the CSM entering the atmosphere can be such that lift is created. There can be enough lift and speed to put it back into orbit longer than the amount of oxygen they have available. The window is not that small. It was well within the capability of a typical aircraft autopilot at the time. Nice video presentation but the reality is nobody went to the moon, particularly with a 1960s computer...
Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in
the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videos of stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radar stations on the moon to verify the unknown orbit of the fake CMS, and the ignition time of the LEM, and track the fake LEMs altitude and range as a function of time for descent and ascent. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane, but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.
@@suekennedy8917 Well okay, but at least we're certain we put Apollo 11 through 17 up into space, at least, right? So, if we didn't go to the moon, what were we really up to, up there?
Just a little info I picked up on the ascent stage on the LM: the engine was never tested on Earth, and its fire up or ignition was its first initial run. It was basically a clean engine up to the required use. Apollo 11, and the engineers on Earth, had a dramatic countdown once Neil and Buzz were getting ready to return. On top of that, Buzz broke the one ignition switch during their short stay on the Moon’s surface. They actually used the tip of a pen to fire up the engine.
Nice! Yeah that be pretty scary, cross your fingers that the engine turns on or stuck on the moon
Just wanted to point out that they did have some redundancy with important controls and electrical systems. If the pen fix hadn't worked, there were people on the ground already working on another solution with the electrical system although I can't remember the details. The built in redundancy NASA insisted upon was a big reason why Grumman was having a difficult time keeping the weight of the LM within the tight guidelines.
Saber Tig: Nobody went to the moon, particularly with a 1960s computer and changing second moment with 4 groups of constant force steering motors...
Knowing how to evaluate evidence, or lack of evidence, is a good first step to revealing what a hoax it is. Having an engineering degree is helpful but not necessary to know what questions to ask or find huge inconsistencies in the moon hoax. Big problem for them is what were graduate level courses in the 1950s and 1960s are now undergrad courses, so there is not much of a mystery to use undergrad courses to ask questions they cant or dont want to answer....
Where is the video showing the inside of them LEM with the astronauts in
the moon suits and attached with the bungee cords. They had a periscope in the CSM and LEM for navigation, but for some reason there are no pictures or videos of stars. The second moment changes as the fuel and oxidizer gets used, but somehow these 4 groups of steering motors kept the LEM from crashing. No remote control or autopilot test landing to verify the LEMs control system and steering motors, with the sloshing fuel and oxidizer and water, but somehow they got it right the first time. The LEM simulator Neil flew and crashed obviously did not have the same second moment as the fake studio LEM on the moon stage. No radar stations on the moon to verify the unknown orbit of the fake CSM, and the ignition time of the LEM, and track the fake LEMs altitude and range as a function of time for descent and ascent. For the moon suit sublimator what blackbody absorber temperature did they use for outer space and the maximum power flux from the sun from the ultraviolet to infrared wavelengths. Same with the engine jet landing on the moon and the missing dust cloud and nobody afraid of rocks piercing the LEM or damage to the antennas, steering motors, or landing radar. They could have pointed the cameras up away from the moon instead of golfing on the moon stage but they decided not to because they would have taken pictures of the stage guys on the catwalk They also drove the moon buggy with lots of dust in the vacuum of the moon studio. Where is the video showing the astronauts in the LEM on the studio mooooon putting on their backpack life support. The clown did a fake spacewalk in the non gravity simulator in the airplane, but for some reason no stars in pictures or video from that. Their studio moon suits were contaminated with moon dust, which likely is radioactive, but no problem to put a Geiger counter next to their suits to verify there was no radiation hazard.Neil jumped off the studio LEM, but since it was live they could not slow down the speed by the square root of six, like the Six Million Dollar Man slow motion, because that would put the rest of their studio acting out of sync..Astronauts could not get more than 6 inches off the moon as they were hopping and walking and pretending to be on the moon stage. Radiation heat transfer on the LEM so they used a glycol cooling loop to radiate that heat back out into the air conditioned studio. Total hoax.
Actually everything was planned by the engineers. The astronauts just had to follow the steps that the engineers have given to them. So huge respect to the engineers back then.
Brilliant. A talented young man. Thank you
Loved this, thanks for sharing!
Thanks Joey
When entering the atmosphere, the communication blacks out due to the extreme heat
And the parachute deployed but a debris punches through it
@@snowleopard9463 what debris?
USA,USA,USA,USA,🇺🇸👍🇺🇸 , THANK YOU GREAT, GREAT VIDEO AMERICANS STRONGLY PROUD OF THIS COUNTRY, HAVE A GREAT DAY AMERICA MAY GOD BLESS THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 🇺🇸✌🇺🇸
Ну тупые...
Кусок говна 💩твои уэса!
@@ПепелацГравицапович hzgdjthhdszzzxxxxkfiftsjfstsjsfhsgdkstjsgnxgkjfuryetqrjonchfjgjvkxjvxhchr,ets
And to think how hard mars will get
Super Ripper flame actually its not hard its just expensive even 70s nasa could go for mars but this program could way more expensive
The problem that will have to be solved that wasn't required for a moon landing is Mars gravity. Although it's about 38 percent that of earth, it's still a lot stronger than the moon's. Everything will be heavier, so lifting back off the moon will require much bigger engines and a lot more fuel.
Among several issues that will need to be adressed, this one will be hard. When astronauts come back on earth after 6 month in the ISS, they are unable to stand or walk by themselves and need to be assisted for the time they readapt to the earth gravity. Despite the physical training they get in orbit.
Now imagine them on the Mars surface, after a year without gravity, suddenly undergoing a .38 G environment. Who will welcome them and give them assistance. Do you think they will be able to work and perform?
Really really informative and easier
to understand. Thanks for putting it in UA-cam. Peace ✌
I have never seen a UA-camr explain anything better than this guy
What happens to the service module when it’s detached?
I can answer now it burns up re entering the atmosphere
"Once we're back in earth orbit, the service module is no longer needed."
The Apollo's that came back from the moon did not return to earth orbit. They followed a 11.2 km/s direct entry approach with an atmospheric tangent of around 96 km in altitude. Fifteen minutes or around 10,000 km prior to reaching the point of tangency, the command module shed the service module which was no longer needed.
Erik Bakker - Thanks. Great explanation. In English, you reverse the period and comma, thus 11.2 km/s and 10,000 km.
@@virvisquevir3320 You're right. I corrected it. Thanks for pointing it out.
Erik Bakker - Cheers!
“The climax of the whole mission is called reentry.” 🤭
I've seen lots of videos but I must admit that these three ones are the best.
As a space and science teacher I'm deeply grateful to you.
thank you!
I don't have words to appreciate your hard work for these videos which clearly shows complete procedure about how Apollo missions have carried out.
Great job boss, thanks for your valuable work.
The dislikes are the people who believe the earth is flat
Or the People WHO believe the Moon landing is fake
It is flat. Don't travel too far
Stolen
Gino Asci just like your butt
Gino Asci like your encephalogram
Whomst ever says that this is fake has no brain
Oreo BoomBeach That my friend is an oxymoron. You have no brain. You have no business exchanging ideas with the people posting here because you are intellectually crippled. Please go watch TMZ
Oreo BoomBeach 😂
You must have put a lot of thought into that. 😂
What sort of computer equipment did they have in 1969? The Lunar Module and Command Module rendezvoused withOUT a computer guidance system, just with Michael Collins's eyesight? Bullshit!
@@tmorpheme ua-cam.com/video/ULGi3UkgW30/v-deo.html this computer
@@tmorpheme.
3:35 **dies of cringe**
what does that mean?
I watched Apollo 11 as a young kid, it still boggles me that all this was accomplished while very much still in the era of the slide rule. Thanks for the memory jog.
This was some of the best videos explaining this that I have ever seen ! Thank you sir ! I will save these videos to show my children !