What happened to the Hindenburg?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @JaredOwen
    @JaredOwen  5 років тому +3848

    This took a long time to animate - I hope it was fun to watch!
    Check out the blog post about this video:
    www.patreon.com/posts/26931564

    • @Vedanth01
      @Vedanth01 5 років тому +24

      Amazing video.

    • @Vedanth01
      @Vedanth01 5 років тому +10

      Please make video about RAT (Ram Air Turbine)

    • @mistertree553
      @mistertree553 5 років тому +23

      Jared Owen this was beautifully animated with plenty of great details in both the animation and information provided. Bravo!

    • @thetomgamerboi6817
      @thetomgamerboi6817 5 років тому +10

      Note: because of a unrecommended sharp turn, a wire snapped and severed a gas bag and the mooring lines created a static spark.

    • @slimeking101
      @slimeking101 5 років тому +3

      What about the Saturn 5 was it bigger than that?

  • @BigMacOrange
    @BigMacOrange 4 роки тому +16954

    The balls to have a smoking room on this thing is impressive.

    • @f0nk3m0n
      @f0nk3m0n 4 роки тому +1183

      ikr ??? smoking on planes was also super common, and it wasn't officially banned in the united states until (my jaw dropped when I googled this) February 25th 1990. the fucking 90's bro. I'm in utter disbelief. People are so dumb omg.

    • @f0nk3m0n
      @f0nk3m0n 4 роки тому +801

      OMG smoking on planes in the EU was banned in 1997 how are we not extinct

    • @danielamspaugh7519
      @danielamspaugh7519 4 роки тому +159

      @@f0nk3m0n No way! That is crazy.

    • @brockwallace4661
      @brockwallace4661 4 роки тому +329

      I flew to Germany in 95 and smoked on the plane.

    • @user-lf3wr8rh7r
      @user-lf3wr8rh7r 4 роки тому +640

      I think they were referring to it being filled with a flammable gas, rather than than the comfort of non smokers!

  • @Dodo-nb3yc
    @Dodo-nb3yc 4 роки тому +3311

    never realised there was actually this much inside of an airship, thought it was just the control room hanging from the bottom

    • @Cosford91
      @Cosford91 3 роки тому +97

      I thought the same.

    • @aleph_zero1
      @aleph_zero1 3 роки тому +35

      Same

    • @Zelurpio
      @Zelurpio 3 роки тому +82

      As a kid I thought the envelope was all filled with hydrogen and all the rooms were pressurized. I was like 6. I always liked to give ideas on how things worked, I was a smart lad.

    • @sheilaolfieway1885
      @sheilaolfieway1885 3 роки тому +33

      that's a blimp in a zepplin the control room is built mostly into the structure because it's rigid where in a blimp it's not rigid ,but a balloon

    • @reentrysfs6317
      @reentrysfs6317 3 роки тому +24

      @@Zelurpio quit your bullshit

  • @thatmnkid2372
    @thatmnkid2372 5 років тому +2689

    These are the type of videos I watch at 2AM after i told myself I was going to bed at 12

  • @mattpope1746
    @mattpope1746 Рік тому +39

    I’ve always been fascinated with the Hindenburg disaster so it is great to see the workings of the ship in such detail. Thanks for all the hard work that obviously went into this!

  • @felixcat9318
    @felixcat9318 2 роки тому +473

    I recall that a member of the Crew was trapped by the conflagration and had resigned himself to dying, when he was suddenly drenched by a veritable waterfall that came from a water ballast tank above him which fractured!
    The flames around him were extinguished and so he was able to safely escape!
    When I first read about his escape I was really happy for him, and how from facing a truly horrific death he was suddenly saved by a freak occurrence of the only possible means for his survival.
    Your videos are fascinating in their meticulous detail, likewise your narration.

    • @tomt373
      @tomt373 2 роки тому +10

      Meantime, when hydrogen burns, it combines with oxygen, producing H2O, water.

    • @cinquine1
      @cinquine1 Рік тому +42

      @@tomt373 Well, steam. Not nearly as helpful

    • @Rexbraiku
      @Rexbraiku Рік тому

      and he lived to tell u this ?

    • @101Volts
      @101Volts Рік тому +14

      @@Rexbraiku It's easily read about. No one's saying "he told me this while we ate doritos lol"

    • @Ra_Q
      @Ra_Q Рік тому +6

      When God says live, you WILL live❤️🙌

  • @oreosauce5776
    @oreosauce5776 5 років тому +6924

    *Germany should have used ExpressVPN to get Helium*

    • @alex0589
      @alex0589 5 років тому +145

      Oreo Sauce -suspicious amounts of online orders for helium coming from *checks notes* lincoln, nebraska, sir
      -checks out, send it

    • @santiagoperez2094
      @santiagoperez2094 5 років тому +15

      @@AngelLestat2 ehh no, with helium the number of customers would be reduced but still would be rentable. maybe you are assuming that it would not be able to cross based in usa investigations and copy attempts, but these where a total failure and coudlnt even survive cross wind. also, von zeppelin was totally against nazi germany, but he had to get that swastika on his precious bird because usa didnt want to send HIM helium, this was because germany was the only country capable of cross the atlantic, not only passangers, but also with mail service, so it was a commercial block, nothing to do with nazi germany, that, before the war, was a potential ally to usa.

    • @AngelLestat2
      @AngelLestat2 5 років тому +3

      @@santiagoperez2094 I dont get your point. To fully understand mine I recommend you to read my answer on quora.
      When I said that if the hindenburg would not be able to keep the range it had even with zero payload (no cabins, no passengers, no bed, nothing), I am just taking into account common sense in airships operation.
      All the lift that is lost due 12% less buoyancy, plus the lift lost due to start with lower inflation because you can not vent helium because is expensive, not being able to counter all the weight lost of the fuel mass consumed meanwhile you are in travel or inject hydrogen into the engines to extend range and other helium drawbacks.
      Is not just a matter that "it would not be so rentable", it can not cross the ocean so it would not be rentable at all unless it would be used just for short range trips, but what is the point to travel on land? for that you used a car or something similar.
      At those times the benefic was the speed of airships vs ships.
      About cross winds not sure what you mean, Zeppelings (from the zeppeling brand), had a lot of experience and they was well constructed (mostly due the extra buoyancy margin you get with hydrogen that can be used for reinforcements), they were in many storms and no passenger die.

    • @santiagoperez2094
      @santiagoperez2094 5 років тому +4

      it isnt a plane, it doesnt consume fuel to generate lift. it didnt got in any storm, in fact its perfect score was also there thnx to its tripulants, search about them

    • @AngelLestat2
      @AngelLestat2 5 років тому +3

      ​@@santiagoperez2094 I know everything about them.. they consume fuel to move... unless you are considering to be super lucky to have the wind with the direction and intensity to where you want to go :P
      They were in many storms.. some lighting hit on them (I am speaking of the last models of zeppelins) and they were ok.
      If you are gonna to discuss, try to make it with facts. Don't make me lose my time with internet trolling.
      I read several books over airships in different languages.

  • @MikMoen
    @MikMoen 3 роки тому +2943

    Make the entire ship a giant flammable balloon.
    "Lets give everyone a place to smoke."

    • @EASPORTSE775
      @EASPORTSE775 3 роки тому +72

      Oh yeah guys let's light a camp fire it will be fun!

    • @potatofuryy
      @potatofuryy 3 роки тому +49

      @@EASPORTSE775 *it wasn’t fun*

    • @TheDragonGamer25
      @TheDragonGamer25 3 роки тому +59

      Ah yes I have an urge to smoke inside the giant hydrogen baloon

    • @watchm4ker
      @watchm4ker 3 роки тому +28

      Really? You're complaining about a smoking room, but cooked meals are fine and dandy?

    • @TheDragonGamer25
      @TheDragonGamer25 3 роки тому +50

      @@watchm4ker Make the entire ship a giant flammable balloon.
      "Lets give everyone a place to cook."

  • @maggiepettit4020
    @maggiepettit4020 Рік тому +198

    My Great grandma is currently 93 and as I'm typing this, is alive. She was born in 1930 in Lakehurst NJ and was 9 at the time of the explosion her father was a crew member that was going to get the ship safely down. Fortunately he survived. My Great Grandma also watched the hidenburg come down. She was watching not too far at a nearby fence.

    • @ramdas363
      @ramdas363 Рік тому +15

      My great great cousin was the mail room on board. Said people sent each other a lot of naughty messages from the air.

    • @matthewmik9
      @matthewmik9 Рік тому +2

      how can you be 9 after 7 years until the explosion

    • @aditsaini5094
      @aditsaini5094 Рік тому +13

      ​@@ramdas363lmao humans never chamnge

    • @Copper_snipezz
      @Copper_snipezz Рік тому +9

      @@ramdas363he was the entire mail room?!?!( srry had to make that joke)

    • @mikey73
      @mikey73 9 місяців тому +1

      @@Copper_snipezz that's impressive

  • @NZREngine
    @NZREngine 4 роки тому +2108

    It's weird that these giant airships were being designed before the tiny modern bike was even invented

    • @TheGrandHistorians
      @TheGrandHistorians 4 роки тому +14

      NZREngine bike was invented 700 years ago go watch praveen mohan channel also vimanas or ufos were made 7,000 years ago. go pay your due dilligence.

    • @w4drone720
      @w4drone720 4 роки тому +218

      @@TheGrandHistorians He means modern bikes, not like Charlie Chaplin looking crap, but i see what you mean

    • @8-bitanimates989
      @8-bitanimates989 4 роки тому +17

      The Grand Historian *modern*

    • @SandeepKumar-mq8cy
      @SandeepKumar-mq8cy 4 роки тому +6

      Man because of you they insult us

    • @ElectricChaplain
      @ElectricChaplain 4 роки тому +27

      @@TheGrandHistorians UFOs wtf. Myths are not historical evidence.
      More like "the grand crackpot"

  • @D-Man_Jam
    @D-Man_Jam 4 роки тому +2260

    _"More than half the people survived"_
    Bruh, how. It was literally just a ball of fire.

    • @ianseldoon1197
      @ianseldoon1197 4 роки тому +383

      "Since they're about to land, most passengers are already at the windows-"

    • @D-Man_Jam
      @D-Man_Jam 4 роки тому +49

      @@ianseldoon1197 yeah, I just watched the Mustard video on it.

    • @noellepatton8901
      @noellepatton8901 4 роки тому +184

      Hydrogen fires mostly explode upward vs other fuel source explosions which explode outwardly in all directions.

    • @Helperbot-2000
      @Helperbot-2000 4 роки тому +73

      @@noellepatton8901 that and the pasenger area was on the bottom of the ship

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 4 роки тому +188

      Many of them survived with broken limbs after jumping. The longer they waited to jump, the lower their fall - but the more likely the airship's fiery form would land atop them. Timing was rather crucial.

  • @Melan_B
    @Melan_B 4 роки тому +2930

    Not gonna lie, the air ships seem really cool

    • @akromimubarok6626
      @akromimubarok6626 3 роки тому +189

      If someone will ever rebuild this airship with the same size or even bigger, i would like to pay a million to have a wedding party there. Traveling the world with your love one, its just like sailing but in the sky.

    • @cclapew
      @cclapew 3 роки тому +69

      There are new airships that are being planned to be built.... the new luxury cruise ships of the sky

    • @akromimubarok6626
      @akromimubarok6626 3 роки тому +19

      @@cclapew is this real? If it cost around 500k to 1,5 million usd to get everything i need. Definitely i will spend my money on it

    • @knoxmarsh0105
      @knoxmarsh0105 3 роки тому +15

      Uuuuuuuntil they catch fire

    • @coniston3106
      @coniston3106 3 роки тому +18

      @@akromimubarok6626 And no rush. Aircrafts nowadays travel for hours, which is too short to spend some time. Airship is one cool thing, but just to make sure it doesn't burn 😂.

  • @jo2ed
    @jo2ed Рік тому +7

    Wow, incredible video with the animation. It is exactly what I was looking to understand. I visited a museum that presented the Hindenburg and I had no idea there were passengers in it.
    Thank you very much for sharing and keeping this video up!

  • @davidt01
    @davidt01 4 роки тому +1152

    "Unfortunately, most of the evidence was burned up."
    You don't say.

  • @cactusjack2264
    @cactusjack2264 3 роки тому +1283

    It’s amazing anyone even survived this, let alone 62 out of the 97 passengers survived. Incredible… 🤯😳

    • @samtheking5759
      @samtheking5759 3 роки тому +62

      (All of the passengers were nazıs)

    • @arigenix
      @arigenix 3 роки тому +23

      @@samtheking5759 lmao

    • @OhNotThat
      @OhNotThat 3 роки тому +9

      inb4 "the hidenberg disaster wasn't so bad, most people survived it" xD

    • @haifutter4166
      @haifutter4166 2 роки тому +19

      Makes me wonder, if we could make the hazards irrelevant when constructing an explosion and fire proof passenger cabin with todays materials (aerogel-coat for fireproofing, carbon fibre for the walls etc.) and adding sensors and other preventive measures. A few autonomous cargo airships are currently in operation, but I think airships have a so bad image, that they wont be re-adopted for passenger transport anytime soon. And helium is not future proof because of rising prices due to it's supply being limited.

    • @kimgkomg
      @kimgkomg 2 роки тому +13

      @@haifutter4166 I think people would much rather take a plane just because it's way faster

  • @jeanapp_
    @jeanapp_ 5 років тому +190

    Crisp and clear animation to show how the layout of the thing is. I'm an aircraft design engineer and it's definitely interesting to see how they designed this.
    Thank you for the fantastic explanation!

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 років тому +8

      😁

    • @DavidSmith-ss1cg
      @DavidSmith-ss1cg 5 років тому +4

      Great, easy-to-understand images in this superb video, I agree that your work of the illustrators art shows the interior really well.
      You do great work, I have subscribed in a second. I am looking forward to seeing more of your videos.

  • @LupeCoded
    @LupeCoded Рік тому +50

    The reason the fire started from the back was because the captain was pushing the Airship to its limits. That caused one of the control cables to snap and puncture the body of the airship. This combined with the static electricity phenomenon described in this video is what led to the spark that ignited the Hindenburg.

    • @davidwuhrer6704
      @davidwuhrer6704 11 місяців тому +1

      No, the static electricity built up between a hydrogen vent flap and the hull. Venting hydrogen was part of the docking procedure, but there was not supposed to be any static electricity. Someone must have used unsafe paint.

    • @ThatGreyGentleman
      @ThatGreyGentleman 11 місяців тому +1

      @@davidwuhrer6704you almost got it. It was the weather conditions, as well as the cross-Atlantic flight, that made the whole surface damp with salt water. Built up a huge charge. PBS Nova explains the whole thing

    • @davidwuhrer6704
      @davidwuhrer6704 11 місяців тому +2

      @@ThatGreyGentleman A charge compared to the ground was expected. There had been hundreds of crossings across the Atlantic before, and none of them ignited vented hydrogen. The issue in question is the charge between the flap and the hull, both of which had been exposed to the same weather conditions simultaneously.
      Go back to school.

    • @denniskrenz2080
      @denniskrenz2080 Місяць тому

      That is a good possibility, but the theory has its errors and thats part of the mystery. The ship was already heavy in the rear (lost more hydrogen there than further forward) and had to drop more aft ballast than usual before the radical maneuvers for the urgent landing took place. So the damage must already have happened while the ship was flying over the USA and waited for the thunderstorms to pass. None of the witnesses mentioned any hard maneuvers before and also the captain was not handling the wheel, as usual (since the bridge crew operated on their own without many commands by the captain during a landing). But a snapped tensioner cable is the most likely culprit anyway. This had happened before, since these piano wires actually made the aircraft rigid and are under heavy stress during turbulence and maneuvers.

    • @denniskrenz2080
      @denniskrenz2080 Місяць тому

      @@davidwuhrer6704 The hydrogen, that gets vented controlled or from overpressure valves also goes into the vent shafts and not into the hull itself. This venting is actually even a safety measure, since the venting ensured that the gas cells only contain hydrogen and no oxygen needed for a combustion. But some amount of leakage happened anyway, a zeppelin needs some airflow through its hull all the time to remove the hydrogen gathering at the top. The slower the airship travels, the harder it gets to remove all the leaked hydrogen from its hull.

  • @destkiller100
    @destkiller100 Рік тому +714

    My grandfather was a german teen when he served on the Hindenburg as the accident happened but somehow he managed to survive the tragedy. After that he wrote a 1 of 1 book which afterwards he handed over to us about it with a lot pictures and explainings whose describe how he could survive. Truly heartbreaking and devastating. Unfortunately he died 2014 as last survivor of the Hindeburg. If you guys are interested in the book I could share some pictures, but beware, everything is written in german for those who don't understand !

    • @damsbaug33
      @damsbaug33 Рік тому +73

      A quick Google search says the last survivor died in 2019. Werner G. Doehner - and he was only 8 at the time of the accident.

    • @lecuz5400
      @lecuz5400 Рік тому +5

      I would love to see the book what's your Instagram?

    • @destkiller100
      @destkiller100 Рік тому +179

      @@damsbaug33 My fault. Werner Doehner was the last surviving passenger. My grandfather who died back in 2014 was the last surving crew member of the Hindenburg.

    • @destkiller100
      @destkiller100 Рік тому

      @@lecuz5400 Sure ! sthweirdhppnd

    • @joebidenofficialpotus
      @joebidenofficialpotus Рік тому +5

      Werner Franz?

  • @alyssanguyen9704
    @alyssanguyen9704 4 роки тому +3040

    Another episode of where quarantine has gotten me

  • @_HMCB_
    @_HMCB_ Рік тому +2

    First time visitor and not the last of my visits. Amazing graphic work. You’ve earned a new subscriber.

  • @andreibaciu7518
    @andreibaciu7518 2 роки тому +881

    Having a smoking room on a ship full of hydrogen has the same energy as not having enough life boats because you think your ship is unsinkable

    • @rock3tcatU233
      @rock3tcatU233 Рік тому +16

      The hydrogen wasn't the main cause of the accident, instead the aluminium powder laced cellulose skin caused the initial fire.

    • @productions4452
      @productions4452 Рік тому +20

      Not really because it was pressurised, completely safe, and there was a single electric lighter used by the steward to light up the cigars, cigarettes, or pipes of the passengers. You couldnt bring your own lighter aboard or anything that could be considered dangerous.

    • @willknight13
      @willknight13 Рік тому +19

      The titanic not having enough lifeboats is a common misconception and actually had /more/ lifeboats than the recommended amount

    • @RobertCraft-re5sf
      @RobertCraft-re5sf Рік тому +9

      @@willknight13 Yeah the thinking at the time was the liveboats would be used for multiple trips between a nearby rescue ship

    • @RobertCraft-re5sf
      @RobertCraft-re5sf Рік тому +4

      It was a beautiful airship and operated safely for years. Still the largest flying object ever built.

  • @eadecamp
    @eadecamp 4 роки тому +195

    My mother was 11 at the time. She said people could see the smoke 80 miles away in Bergenfield.

  • @AbandonedMines11
    @AbandonedMines11 5 років тому +309

    Great video! Loved the animations. Very clear and easy to understand.

  • @babbybailey
    @babbybailey 26 днів тому +1

    I'm putting together a wooden "static model" kit of the Hindenburg. The details I could make and add from your intensive research is inspiring.
    Aside from classic filmed crash, this video is the best I've ever seen.
    Amazing work. In my favorite list.

  • @than217
    @than217 Рік тому +186

    2/3rd of the passengers surviving a 1 minute crash has always been the most astonishing part to me. Those people were booking it.

    • @Daniela-Christianson
      @Daniela-Christianson 6 місяців тому +6

      I was today's years old when I learned there even WERE survivors

  • @hem89180
    @hem89180 5 років тому +686

    OMG, you make the greatest animations of the internet!

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 років тому +37

      Thanks Hugo😁

    • @alex0589
      @alex0589 5 років тому +5

      For real.

    • @gogo8965
      @gogo8965 5 років тому +3

      your sample size is small, very very small

    • @mikebather6688
      @mikebather6688 5 років тому

      GYANDEEP SINGH (B15EE014) indian

    • @rottree
      @rottree 5 років тому

      Couldn't agree with you more!

  • @ZitMaGaming
    @ZitMaGaming 4 роки тому +2942

    Titanic: I'm cold.
    Hindenburg: I'm hot.
    edit: wow 3000 likes this is my most liked comment!

  • @RARufus
    @RARufus 8 місяців тому +2

    My grandma passed last year at 102 years and told us many times about seeing the Hindenburg docked in NY when she was a child. A few years later the disaster happened.

  • @potempkey-z3h
    @potempkey-z3h 4 роки тому +232

    Flying over brazil in this thing would've been the coolest thing ever

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 4 роки тому +1

      Zulul

    • @aaravrapelli4401
      @aaravrapelli4401 4 роки тому

      Your 66 th like

    • @MistuhKayTrains
      @MistuhKayTrains 4 роки тому +3

      YOU’RE GOING TO BRAZIL 🇧🇷

    • @reza7xz307
      @reza7xz307 4 роки тому +1

      Yeah it’s cool until the landing

    • @juttaweise
      @juttaweise 8 місяців тому

      actually the Hindenburg made a round the world trip and yes Brazil too. There are photos that had been
      taken over Rio, visible at the Zeppelin Museum in Zeppelinheim near Frankfurt. Actually a village which
      was created just for all the employees at the Zeppelin company, as it was just at almost waking distance
      of the airport. You can look at it on google maps.

  • @NerdyPapayaRoblox
    @NerdyPapayaRoblox 3 роки тому +413

    Hydrogen: Extremely flammable
    Engineers: Hey! Let's add a smoking room, too!

    • @remi_gio
      @remi_gio 3 роки тому +37

      ..you are poorly informed on the subject. Room was pressurised exactly because of that. In those days nobody would travel on that airship without being able to smoke. And again this was not the cause of the disaster. 🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @remi_gio
      @remi_gio 3 роки тому +11

      @Diego Jimenez ..not as dumb as your idiotic comment! Have you ever designed anything in your life? Maybe the arrangement of condiments on your sandwich! 😂🤦🏻‍♂️

    • @CupidFromKentucky
      @CupidFromKentucky 3 роки тому +11

      If the room wasn't there, people would still have smoked. This gave them a safe place to do it.

    • @trainwreckgaming1120
      @trainwreckgaming1120 3 роки тому +3

      *adds smoking room*
      “ah yes, fire and hydrogen mix very well, nien?”

    • @Bananappleboy
      @Bananappleboy 3 роки тому

      People really have to be rude these days.

  • @reeceayres2741
    @reeceayres2741 4 роки тому +630

    That's crazy how 100 years later with all the tech we have now, that this still trumps the size of any modern aircraft today

    • @TreniFS_
      @TreniFS_ 3 роки тому +120

      Consider that the majority of the volume was just for the gas: most airliners can carry the same amount of passengers

    • @J.Wolf90
      @J.Wolf90 3 роки тому +18

      Crazy how we've had flying carriages (cars) called airplanes for over 100 years and people still ask why we don't have flying cars yet. Smh

    • @sasasa1541
      @sasasa1541 3 роки тому +65

      @@J.Wolf90 we do, they just suck. There’s no demand for flying cars and I’m pretty glad we don’t have any. There are 102 major car accidents per day in the USA; flight accidents are much more lethal and destructive. Imagine if you had a country where the vehicles combined the accessibility of cars with the power of flying vehicles. We’d need extensive testing, much more than our current driving tests, to let people own them, and anyone who wants to might as well skip the fantasy and buy a Cessna or something.

    • @J.Wolf90
      @J.Wolf90 3 роки тому +26

      @@sasasa1541 yeah if you really want a flying car just get your pilots license and buy an airplane. the airplane IS the flying car. People want something that they can park in their garage but that will never happen. There are too many safety hazards and restrictions on aircraft's that you're better off just buying a normal plane. But anyways flying cars really are just airplanes

    • @Malamockq
      @Malamockq 3 роки тому +9

      @@kuckoo9036 Dude, it's 1930s technology. Hybrid airships potentially can carry a lot more. Concepts for large hybrid airships can carry 1000 tons of cargo.

  • @A2D4
    @A2D4 10 місяців тому +1

    I have always wondered what it looked like inside. Your video is the first time that has been illustrated (that I’ve ever seen anyway) & it is EXCELLENT. Thank you so much for your work and talent! 👍🏻

  • @sanchezking6188
    @sanchezking6188 4 роки тому +343

    Imagine being the poor dude who had to tell the Fuhrer about the loss of his prized airship :/

    • @katekatey279
      @katekatey279 4 роки тому +2

      🥺

    • @John-iu8cv
      @John-iu8cv 4 роки тому +11

      Prolly got shot out of anger ya know

    • @kkhagerty6315
      @kkhagerty6315 4 роки тому +7

      Sanchez King Fegelein did it

    • @neves3375
      @neves3375 4 роки тому +46

      "Hello?"
      "Hindenburg is ded"
      "no"

    • @kkhagerty6315
      @kkhagerty6315 4 роки тому +8

      Okuyasu Nijimura whre wer u wen Hindenburg diye

  • @walnuthillfarms7579
    @walnuthillfarms7579 4 роки тому +1991

    I didn't know the Nazis used Minecraft Beds

    • @gamertequan7799
      @gamertequan7799 4 роки тому +51

      They did its it crazy

    • @ferreisd71
      @ferreisd71 4 роки тому +62

      Well. Nazis are red and Minecraft beds are red so.

    • @gamertequan7799
      @gamertequan7799 4 роки тому +4

      Ferrei SD it’s it crazy I think they did it crazy it’s

    • @luisarturo3860
      @luisarturo3860 4 роки тому +66

      *Meinkraft

    • @zfloyd1627
      @zfloyd1627 4 роки тому +21

      @@ferreisd71 mojang is Nazi. *CONFIRMED* .

  • @Jeff-fn-G
    @Jeff-fn-G 3 роки тому +100

    Bro, just watched for the first time. Although I'm late to the party, I needed to say - thank you. This is excellent content. I'm looking forward to watching the rest of your videos. Well done!

  • @BlueEyed888
    @BlueEyed888 2 місяці тому

    Great video and much more informative than any other videos I’ve seen published. Nice computer rendering of the interior layout of the ship, never seen that before.

  • @neurofiedyamato8763
    @neurofiedyamato8763 5 років тому +239

    I don't think airships are obsolete. They would be awesome as a luxury cruise much like ships. long distance travel will be dominated by fixed wing but airships can still be use for luxury cruises.

    • @q.e.d.9112
      @q.e.d.9112 5 років тому +30

      Matthew Morycinski
      Until we start running fusion reactors, then we’ll have heaps of helium. But weight will always be the issue with airships. Another disadvantage, they operate at levels that subject them to a lot of weather, whereas modern aircraft cruise well above the weather. They could probably use dehumidifiers to capture water. Like you, I don’t think they’d be suitable as cruise liners, but maybe some billionaire might like a private Airyacht. Great platform for viewing things like the America’s Cup, or F1 Grand Prix.
      I’m afraid they’re always going to be unwieldy things, close to the ground, in turbulent weather. Severe wind shear could spin one out of control, though modern vectored thrust would help mitigate this.
      Sorry, just rambling. Must be time for bed.

    • @PabloGonzalez-hv3td
      @PabloGonzalez-hv3td 5 років тому +2

      That's what first class, private jets and yachts are for

    • @TheMaster4534
      @TheMaster4534 5 років тому +8

      Airships can also be used as flying cargo ships due to restricted weight limit of fixed wing aircraft.

    • @samanli-tw3id
      @samanli-tw3id 5 років тому +1

      Levente Lénárt Try to put a swimming pool on an airship!

    • @RohitBorah
      @RohitBorah 4 роки тому +2

      these are fuel efficient as well

  • @deboditray5834
    @deboditray5834 3 роки тому +139

    Germany, however had a flawless record so far
    Hindenburg : I'mma bout' to destroy this nation's reputation .

    • @EarMaster55
      @EarMaster55 3 роки тому +4

      To be fair the first accident in the list LZ-104 was a German airship, built by Zeppelin, but it was a military vessel so technically no "passengers" were killed. It is also unclear why LZ-104 exploded as it happened over water and there were no survivors.

    • @deboditray5834
      @deboditray5834 3 роки тому +1

      @@EarMaster55 thanks fir the info

    • @2ndplatooncmdrofUSNAVYSEAL
      @2ndplatooncmdrofUSNAVYSEAL 3 роки тому

      That's stupid.

    • @hurricanemeridian8712
      @hurricanemeridian8712 3 роки тому

      @@2ndplatooncmdrofUSNAVYSEAL Because?

    • @tat4kingglassrat549
      @tat4kingglassrat549 3 роки тому +1

      world war II also did it but worse

  • @emuliusv
    @emuliusv 5 років тому +520

    Would probably feel like a badass running out of a massive burning wreck.

    • @alex0589
      @alex0589 5 років тому +90

      Emuli V nothing as badass as running for your life after leaving your loved ones to die horribly

    • @rews3873
      @rews3873 5 років тому +26

      @@alex0589 running with broken legs

    • @hamstsorkxxor
      @hamstsorkxxor 5 років тому +20

      And dying anyway, due to radiant heat giving you 3rd degree burns on your back and neck.

    • @DavidSmith-ss1cg
      @DavidSmith-ss1cg 5 років тому +8

      After you kick them smelly clumps out of the ends of your pants legs and wipe yourself, yeah.

    • @timedrifter117
      @timedrifter117 5 років тому +1

      Oh yeah lol your sick

  • @Jacqueline_Oat
    @Jacqueline_Oat Місяць тому +2

    0:58, imagine that size comparison and remember how fast it burned, that's absolutely horrifying. Everything would have burned so fast you wouldn't have the time to realize what's happened. It all burned and crashed in a minute or so too. It's all so horrifying to imagine, they were all just visitors, friends, and family coming to meet family and loved ones. I never knew anything could burn so fast.

  • @muhammadhadiansari2319
    @muhammadhadiansari2319 4 роки тому +399

    There should be a movie of this disaster like titanic

    • @Comando115
      @Comando115 4 роки тому +84

      for only 1 minute of disaster? nah thanks

    • @RegahP
      @RegahP 4 роки тому +54

      yeah dude that movie would last like 10 minutes max

    • @TurtlesWithAutism
      @TurtlesWithAutism 4 роки тому +1

      that's dumb

    • @p_filippouz
      @p_filippouz 4 роки тому +13

      For something that lasted like 50 seconds is an animation, not a film.
      And it is even a waste of resources.
      I mean, we have the original footage! Which is slot better!

    • @Boozebedrunk
      @Boozebedrunk 4 роки тому +14

      It was called Indiana Jones and last crusade

  • @tomholland3310
    @tomholland3310 4 роки тому +337

    I would so have an anxiety attack just from a guy lighting a cig in the
    blimp

    • @starthelotus3453
      @starthelotus3453 4 роки тому +4

      Not even a blimp

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 4 роки тому +4

      Me too, but they did have very strict regulations in the smoking room.... they were very aware of the danger.

    • @buckhorncortez
      @buckhorncortez 4 роки тому +4

      It's not a blimp. Blimps don't have an airframe. That's why it's called a dirigible, it has an internal, structural frame.

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 4 роки тому

      @@buckhorncortez Fair enough!

  • @stickyfox
    @stickyfox 2 роки тому +89

    I grew up in Ocean County and it has always amazed me that something of historic significance happened there.

    • @tula1433
      @tula1433 Рік тому +3

      Same! I live in Manchester! Wild!

  • @ivanoguido8026
    @ivanoguido8026 11 місяців тому

    Fantastic job, Jared! Clear, understandable and full of information. Thank you!

  • @eggyfried1364
    @eggyfried1364 3 роки тому +625

    Is no one going to talk about the amazing animating?

    • @Spritecar69420
      @Spritecar69420 3 роки тому +2

      I can do that but not with that platform bcuz EXPENSIVE PC REQUIRED

    • @BrendanPJames
      @BrendanPJames 3 роки тому +4

      Um people are talking about it. Miss me with your stupid comment

    • @sik59rt
      @sik59rt 3 роки тому +7

      New to the channel?

    • @AtulKumar-od4es
      @AtulKumar-od4es 3 роки тому

      I am new channel

    • @AtulKumar-od4es
      @AtulKumar-od4es 3 роки тому +1

      I am new to this channel

  • @kipptt
    @kipptt 4 роки тому +572

    other countries: hydrogen filled airships are dangerous.
    germany: uhm yeah no

    • @alexmudkip5974
      @alexmudkip5974 4 роки тому +39

      Well, America didn't want to give helium to Germany.

    • @johnw2026
      @johnw2026 4 роки тому +14

      @@alexmudkip5974 Probably because every time Hitler started hollering, his voice pitch went up like he was breathing the stuff on a regular basis. 😁

    • @blackisblack22
      @blackisblack22 4 роки тому

      kippt USA also: let’s c * zap! *

    • @TheGrandHistorians
      @TheGrandHistorians 4 роки тому +5

      the americans shot it down thats what really happened

    • @maxmustermann4149
      @maxmustermann4149 4 роки тому +6

      @@johnw2026 Nah, the Western countries didn't really like Germany even before Hitler's government (NSDAP/DNVP coalition) was elected in 1933.

  • @kroarchive
    @kroarchive Рік тому

    great video! Thanks for the time put into it! I shared it to my blog

  • @tomitstube
    @tomitstube 4 роки тому +136

    excellent video, there was however much more to the landing attempt, like a 3 hour delay waiting for weather to clear up, and three water ballast drops to level the ship. further indicating a gas leak. but i thoroughly enjoyed the ship design presentation.

    • @raven4k998
      @raven4k998 2 роки тому

      lol because they were sissy's modern pilots can do it in two🤣

  • @takurotsuchiya4313
    @takurotsuchiya4313 5 років тому +500

    If you don't have ticket you will get throw off of the ship

  • @thewatcher5271
    @thewatcher5271 11 місяців тому

    That Was Very Cool! Heard About It My Whole Life & Saw The Famous News Clip But You Made It Very Interesting. Thank You.

  • @zudemaster
    @zudemaster 3 роки тому +160

    The technology for its time was amazing. Less than 50 years earlier and the main forms of transportation were the horse and buggy, and maybe a steam powered locomotive or ship if you were able to afford the price. It really is amazing when you look at how fast technology grew throughout the 20th century and compare that throughout the rest of history and so much of it came from Germany.

    • @jenhofmann
      @jenhofmann 2 роки тому

      ... including the technology to round up and murder millions of innocent people.

    • @iROMine
      @iROMine Рік тому +1

      Nah I mean planes existed at this point too

    • @maplebear6527
      @maplebear6527 11 місяців тому

      I think the Germans had GREAT ideas that i wish could have been fulfilled.

    • @lvooroom
      @lvooroom 2 місяці тому

      ​@@maplebear6527Отличные идеи?))) например уничтожение нации в концлагерях?

  • @L00PdeL00P
    @L00PdeL00P 5 років тому +67

    You really explain everything so well! Awesome video, dude

  • @OfentseMwaseFilms
    @OfentseMwaseFilms 2 роки тому +153

    Great video. Thank you for all the info.

  • @ДмитрийГерасимов-ч8ю
    @ДмитрийГерасимов-ч8ю 8 місяців тому +4

    Судя по последним исследованиям, всему виной обшивка гинденбурга, состоявшая из целюлозы и алюминиевой пудры, по сути, ракетным топливом, хватило малейшей искры, чтобы обшивка вспыхнула, а дальше в дело вступил водород...

  • @contentdeprived2168
    @contentdeprived2168 4 роки тому +94

    Such a graceful machine being destroyed is quite saddening I won’t lie

    • @akromimubarok6626
      @akromimubarok6626 3 роки тому +6

      Im going to be rich and rebuild this wonderful airship

    • @contentdeprived2168
      @contentdeprived2168 3 роки тому +2

      @@akromimubarok6626 i hope so

    • @KutWrite
      @KutWrite 3 роки тому +3

      Umm... The people, too.

    • @thunderbird1921
      @thunderbird1921 3 роки тому +4

      I'm not sure if it was on the fatal last flight, but from what I've read, the Hindenburg on at least one occasion flew directly over the location where Titanic sunk over two decades earlier (and apparently the passengers on the airship looked down from the windows in sad remembrance). If true, what a CREEPY coincidence, and foreshadowing!

    • @laikeree_4213
      @laikeree_4213 3 роки тому

      @@thunderbird1921
      Holy crud 😳

  • @jonskowitz
    @jonskowitz 5 років тому +60

    There's just something so majestic about airships that makes me kind of sad that they're gone.
    Ok, enough nostalgia. Airships never had a very good safety record even without fires. They're just too susceptible to storms and other weather.

    • @Enthropical_Thunder
      @Enthropical_Thunder 5 років тому +8

      Well, from an engineering perspective, airships are majestic too, not because of some kind if nostalgia but because of their functionality. Until today their hasn't been a much more energy efficient way to travel through the air, than using an airship, in fact, airships might make a comeback as a super efficient transportation methode.

    • @drumdad54sdl47
      @drumdad54sdl47 5 років тому +6

      Dr Hugo Eckener, the head honcho of the Zeppelin company, has been quoted as saying that he was well aware of the psychological effect of seeing a large airship in the sky. Incredibly impressive, I say. What a sight they must have been. *sigh**

    • @bigredc222
      @bigredc222 5 років тому

      Yea, the US navy lost a lot people in air ship crashes, and used helium.

    • @EdsterIII
      @EdsterIII 5 років тому +1

      As majestic as they do look, as you said they also have a serious risk factor. Any storm or big cross wind. Yikes. I do appreciate the look of them. They do glide seamlessly through the air but any little hiccup could be tragic.

  • @millenniumvintage9726
    @millenniumvintage9726 2 роки тому +68

    4:44 Small detail but at the time Germanys borders were different than what’s pictured. Their eastern border extended further into modern day Poland past the Oder river and they owned an enclave in East Prussia.

  • @russellswanson7907
    @russellswanson7907 Рік тому

    This is a great animation!! extremely well done! Thank you very much for doing it.

  • @insertname5407
    @insertname5407 5 років тому +268

    Can you do: How a locomotive/steam locomotive works?
    Great video btw!

    • @jacekmak87
      @jacekmak87 5 років тому +15

      It just goes choo choo. Thats all

    • @mikewizz1895
      @mikewizz1895 5 років тому +1

      @@jacekmak87 This comment kinda annoys me, just because of how you think trains work. I hope it was a joke

    • @jacekmak87
      @jacekmak87 5 років тому +4

      @@mikewizz1895 It's true that's what they do - a choo choo and ocassionaly tooot. That's a fact. And facts don't care about your feelings. Deal with it snowflake.

    • @tadwyn
      @tadwyn 5 років тому +1

      There are forums on the net that talk in depth on steam power and how it works. As Oscar said "It would take a lot of typing to tell" I would suggest one of the steam car clubs for information. Read a lot and politely ask questions. The closest in operation to a locomotive in operation is a traction engine . A friend of someone I know rebuilds those and its fascinating.

  • @mrRufffnTumble
    @mrRufffnTumble 4 роки тому +288

    If I could bring any technology back from the past it would probably be these zeppelin airships. They are so cool, would love to see them flying low over the city.

    • @archiewood4599
      @archiewood4599 3 роки тому +34

      if i saw a zeppelin over my city i would get in the car and drive

    • @helkade
      @helkade 3 роки тому +30

      @@archiewood4599 i live in Germany and here are some Zeppelins :D

    • @elainew2230
      @elainew2230 3 роки тому +5

      I think there is a museum in Europe with a recreation of one of the airships.

    • @kimmybrandt
      @kimmybrandt 3 роки тому +1

      Same! I so want to go in one before I die

    • @aniksamiurrahman6365
      @aniksamiurrahman6365 3 роки тому +7

      Fun fact! If we can make Zeppelin out of Graphene, then we won't need any hydrogen or helium. The only reason why Zeppelins need those gas is that such a large metal frame can't keep its shape and be light enough to fly at the same time.

  • @NotLRK
    @NotLRK 5 років тому +282

    The sounded like the best ship to fly and chill on sad it broke

    • @intrst4532
      @intrst4532 5 років тому +24

      F3ARM3 broke

    • @hiphopguru81
      @hiphopguru81 4 роки тому +4

      @@intrst4532 LOL

    • @saumyalimbu6918
      @saumyalimbu6918 4 роки тому

      Hàha

    • @FlyLeah
      @FlyLeah 4 роки тому +10

      Only cause the US was selfish with not providing helium for sale

    • @immigrantgaming420epic
      @immigrantgaming420epic 4 роки тому +5

      @@FlyLeah they did that because they didn't want them making helium bombers, not being selfish or something

  • @EstefaniaValentin-es8pk
    @EstefaniaValentin-es8pk 10 місяців тому +2

    Muy bueno, tanto el texto como la animación. 👏👏👏

  • @tyrantking9000
    @tyrantking9000 4 роки тому +359

    "they used Hydrogen."
    Me: *spits drink* "THEY _WHAT?!_ "

    • @matdattein
      @matdattein 4 роки тому +35

      They used hydrogen

    • @canasmax5237
      @canasmax5237 4 роки тому +9

      @@matdattein *WHAT WAS THAT?*

    • @tyrantking9000
      @tyrantking9000 4 роки тому +7

      @@matdattein they _WHAT_

    • @Predator1706
      @Predator1706 4 роки тому +3

      TheSoftDrink gen of hydro

    • @WheelsRCool
      @WheelsRCool 4 роки тому +25

      The Germans successfully flew hydrogen airships through thunder and lightning storms. Hydrogen was viewed as safe so long as proper safety procedures were adhered to. Some wonder if it was sabotage that did the Hindenburg in.

  • @lilyfurley9833
    @lilyfurley9833 5 років тому +263

    im really glad you didnt censor history

    • @boataxe4605
      @boataxe4605 5 років тому +48

      And I’m really glad that You Tube has not demonetized him ( yet?) For being historically accurate.

    • @eyyo_0236
      @eyyo_0236 5 років тому +1

      Lily Furley fuck U

    • @arespeverell9877
      @arespeverell9877 5 років тому +26

      @@eyyo_0236 Thats Fucking Rude!

    • @fuckthepolice.9410
      @fuckthepolice.9410 5 років тому +29

      @@eyyo_0236 heeeeere snowflake heeeeere snowflake

    • @dxov1597
      @dxov1597 5 років тому +5

      Bay max steve why are you mad wtf are you cocaine

  • @katatat2030
    @katatat2030 3 роки тому +69

    I've heard it mentioned by others that a thunderstorm was building at the time, which could easily have been the cause of the static buildup

    • @kennymartin5976
      @kennymartin5976 2 роки тому +17

      I saw an investigative documentary on this the other day, and they did a serries of test to prove that large static charges could have easily occurred under the conditions that day.

    • @rudeawakening3833
      @rudeawakening3833 10 місяців тому

      Or a “ tracer “ round from a rifle in the nearby woods …

  • @DanielGrovePhoto
    @DanielGrovePhoto Рік тому

    Awesome video, animations, music, and execution!! Thank you! Do you do your own animation?

  • @secretgarden4287
    @secretgarden4287 4 роки тому +349

    Brief description:
    He doesn't know what happened either.

  • @Nysvarth
    @Nysvarth 3 роки тому +40

    Came here to find out the cause of the accident, 7 minutes into the video:
    7:26 "No-one knows for sure what caused the ship to catch on fire"
    Thanks, really cleared things up for me.

    • @aeciocarvalho8958
      @aeciocarvalho8958 3 роки тому

      KKKKKKKKKKKKK

    • @supertoasting1011
      @supertoasting1011 3 роки тому +7

      Here is a plausible hypothesis I read about.
      The Hindenburg may have steered too aggressively on approach which caused some structural damage that ruptured a hydrogen cell. When the mooring lines made contact with the ground it may have discharged some static electricity since everything was soaked from the rain. It would have just taken one small spark in the area with the leak to ignite.

    • @brodster7042
      @brodster7042 3 роки тому +4

      @theo nicole Houston if it was the smoking room the explosion would be in the front

  • @stephenbrand5661
    @stephenbrand5661 3 роки тому +54

    4:50 This map shows what Germany looked like after 1990, very different from what it looked like in 1937.

    • @ARG0T
      @ARG0T 3 роки тому +4

      it needs most of silesia, pomerania and east prussia

    • @AndreStutzer-yk7eg
      @AndreStutzer-yk7eg 3 роки тому +5

      Right. This is the map after the reunion of West and East Germany and not the one of 1937. And that time it was the German Empire (Deutsches Reich) and not Germany.

    • @gamering2354
      @gamering2354 2 роки тому

      * 4:44

    • @stephenbrand5661
      @stephenbrand5661 2 роки тому

      @@gamering2354 danke

  • @Birdion-du6kv
    @Birdion-du6kv 4 місяці тому

    Great video. Always am making sure to see new videos. Good luck! 🍀

  • @__-pl3jg
    @__-pl3jg 5 років тому +18

    This is my favorite animation thus far! This should be shown in schools. It illustrates the power of media in forming future markets. It also shows that Helium filled air ships with modern safety features like parachutes would actually be a very good idea for future travel.
    Also, something not mentioned...The Hindenburg gas bladders were made of animal skins glued together. Modern materials would be waaaay better at preventing leaks.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 років тому

      Thank you for your comment!

    • @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870
      @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 5 років тому

      Helium filled "airships" are still in use for transportation. Mostly for scientific (or military) purposes, transporting mastly cargo and not people, but there are plans to use them as cheap telephone/internet stations or to transport people and cargo to areas where it would he impossible to build a conventional airfield.

    • @camojoe83
      @camojoe83 5 років тому +2

      Helium..
      You do know how rare helium is, right?

    • @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870
      @thefirstprimariscatosicari6870 5 років тому

      @@camojoe83 We use it in balloons in industrial quantities.

    • @TheOwenMajor
      @TheOwenMajor 5 років тому +1

      The only way airships could make a resurgence is with hydrogen lifting gas.
      Simple economics and operations mean that helium would never work.

  • @newbeginnings8566
    @newbeginnings8566 4 роки тому +56

    The most wide held theory now is that the airship tried to turn too quickly causing too much stress on the rear section.. This damage led to rupture of the rear gas bags which then ignited.. The resulting chain reaction throughout the airship caused the final destruction...

    • @Alombe
      @Alombe 3 роки тому +2

      @@somedumbozzie1539 It was not count Zeppelin, he was not alive at this time, it was Hugo Echner that was the head of the Zeppelin company at the time of the disaster and he was furious as you said

  • @zacmumblethunder7466
    @zacmumblethunder7466 5 років тому +32

    Whenever I see a "What happened to " title, I can't help remembering my mother's reaction in a shop to a shelf full of books about the Titanic. Pointing to one called "All you need to know about Titanic" she said "It sank, that's all you need to know".
    Good video though, I've always loved airships.

    • @JaredOwen
      @JaredOwen  5 років тому +4

      Good point Zac! I guess "All you need to know" is kind of a relative statement. Thanks for watching my video

    • @zacmumblethunder7466
      @zacmumblethunder7466 5 років тому +1

      @@JaredOwen My mother has opinions. And if anyone doesn't like any of them, she's got a whole heap of others as well.
      I've never seen such a clear description of the interior of an airship. Thanks!

    • @ashwinv3750
      @ashwinv3750 4 роки тому

      yyyyýyyyyýyyyyyuyuuuuuuuý7ir

    • @monojdas1914
      @monojdas1914 4 роки тому

      @@ashwinv3750 youre just a dumb person so shut up

    • @ashwinv3750
      @ashwinv3750 4 роки тому

      @@monojdas1914 poo in the loo

  • @-C.S.R
    @-C.S.R 5 років тому +200

    Static electricity for sure! When they threw the ropes down they hit the water that was in puddles on the ground! The charge went up the ropes and kaboom!

    • @gunnerkolb2066
      @gunnerkolb2066 5 років тому +6

      C.S.R 🤯🤯🤯

    • @cubnation
      @cubnation 5 років тому +36

      Who knows though. Couldn't the air be surcharged with static electricity because of the storms that passed through?

    • @Cheese_Doggy12
      @Cheese_Doggy12 5 років тому

      Eh..

    • @PlebanMuzeum
      @PlebanMuzeum 5 років тому +13

      The charge always goes down to the ground, just like when you touch (or at least should do) your car after getting off on a gas station, before getting the gasoline. The rest could be as you say.

    • @cubnation
      @cubnation 5 років тому +5

      @@PlebanMuzeum That makes a lot of sense. :)

  • @minecraftheaven5965
    @minecraftheaven5965 5 років тому +102

    This was actually my science homework, Lucky you made this video! Thank you!

  • @urmombiggay6488
    @urmombiggay6488 4 роки тому +377

    "Hey let's put a smoking room in the place where there is the most amount of hydrogen compressed in the whole world like wtf could go wrong" 😤🙌

    • @pas5735
      @pas5735 4 роки тому +42

      If there wasn’t a smoking room no one at the time would board it

    • @somelokyguy6466
      @somelokyguy6466 4 роки тому +20

      The smoking room actually made the ship safer.

    • @somelokyguy6466
      @somelokyguy6466 4 роки тому +46

      @Zan People were gonna smoke onboard regardless of whether there was a dedicated smoking room or not.
      It's better to have all your smokers in a single controlled area instead of hiding in various places. It's why airline toilets still have ashtrays, the designers know people will smoke in the toilets and putting ashes in the bin is a fire hazard.

    • @Ronnie-Jones
      @Ronnie-Jones 4 роки тому +2

      The most forbidden documentary in history:
      “Europa The Last Battle” at archive dot org
      archive.org/details/EUROPATheLastBattle

    • @haassteambraker9959
      @haassteambraker9959 3 роки тому +1

      The hydrogen was not compressed. Airships such as these rely entirely on being lighter than the volume of air that they displace (same principles as a boat or submarine). Compressing hydrogen would make it denser, and completely defeat its function as a lifting gas. Not to mention pressure vessels for any substantial amount of hydrogen would be quite heavy.

  • @thomass.7262
    @thomass.7262 4 місяці тому

    Great video - so much information in that short clip!

  • @zinc_trioxide
    @zinc_trioxide 3 роки тому +134

    If theres no hindenburg accident imagine zeppelin technology today

    • @aleph_zero1
      @aleph_zero1 3 роки тому +18

      I think the world would still switch to modern airplane anyway

    • @auralplex
      @auralplex 3 роки тому +15

      @@aleph_zero1 Nah dog, balloons are way better.

    • @wlink639
      @wlink639 3 роки тому

      I'd imagine that at some point engines got powerful enough using hydrogen/hellium balloons for lift wasn't worth it anymore.

    • @jonahsuddeth5893
      @jonahsuddeth5893 3 роки тому +2

      Now days a few companies are working on making new airships and using jet streams they will compete with the speed of jets

    • @mattjackson9859
      @mattjackson9859 3 роки тому

      @Niko MyCousin Not inflammable - would use helium, not hydrogen

  • @cbesthelper404
    @cbesthelper404 3 роки тому +9

    Wonderfully done, Jared. You explained everything so clearly. Outstanding job with the visuals as well!

  • @afoxwithahat7846
    @afoxwithahat7846 5 років тому +43

    Hydrogen shouldn't have the same color of the other elements :)
    But that's just the best explanation I ever saw.

  • @larrytate5605
    @larrytate5605 Рік тому

    thanx for sharing,.....great illustrations and narration !!!!

  • @dontcheckmyyoutubeprofilep199
    @dontcheckmyyoutubeprofilep199 4 роки тому +22

    man gave us a whole 5 star tour of the hiddenburg

  • @StanleyMessie
    @StanleyMessie 4 роки тому +57

    The hindenburg dropped large quantities of ballast water from the aft moments before the explosion, in order to level out the tail. Could that have caused a build up of static electricity?

    • @billygateus8024
      @billygateus8024 3 роки тому +3

      You could be right about that .

    • @ShiftingDrifter
      @ShiftingDrifter 3 роки тому +25

      Possibly. The most accepted theory is that it was due to electrostatic arcing in front of the top tail fin and exposed wire reinforcement ties sewn through the skin sparked. The landing had been delayed due to an electrical storm and the airship developed a difference in voltage potential between the ship and ground. The most accepted theory is the spark was triggered when the first mooring ropes were dropped and touched the ground, allowing an electrical current path to ground passing through the frayed, exposed wiring. However, the ballast water theory has never been completely ruled out as a grounding source. The problem is the conflicting eye-witness accounts and the timing of the film.

    • @kimmieh8419
      @kimmieh8419 3 роки тому

      THANK YOU!!! I just commented that he didn’t even say anything about that! I couldn’t understand what the guy in the black and white film was saying it was that it spilt out. I appreciate you!!! Now to Google what ‘Ballast water’ is. 😂

  • @Zerbey
    @Zerbey 4 роки тому +10

    Fascinating video, first time I've ever seen such a detailed tour of the interior.

  • @siept
    @siept 4 місяці тому

    Het was zeker leuk om te kijken. Mooi gemaakt en heel wat duidelijker dan zwart-wit beelden uit de jaren 30

  • @funquay2219
    @funquay2219 3 роки тому +75

    I remember reading somewhere that one of the Captains escaped the flames, but then turned back and re-entered the wreckage to help the injured. He was badly burnt but survived. I wonder if anyone would do that these days? I hope so.

    • @notmenotme614
      @notmenotme614 2 роки тому +6

      It’s in the news today that 3 cops in Arizona stood and watched a man drown as they said to him “I’m not going after you”

    • @sinjin90ful
      @sinjin90ful 2 роки тому +20

      @@notmenotme614 i saw that i live in AZ he ran from them jumped in and tried swimming to escape cops told him not going in. You know how risky it is to save a drowning man with no flotation devices? they will drag you down. He made his choice

    • @valgo8128
      @valgo8128 2 роки тому +2

      @@notmenotme614 cops have my full support

    • @notmenotme614
      @notmenotme614 2 роки тому +5

      @@valgo8128 full support to stand there and do nothing to help

    • @valgo8128
      @valgo8128 2 роки тому +7

      @@notmenotme614 Nobody expects them to jump in

  • @imtootiredforthis7694
    @imtootiredforthis7694 3 роки тому +212

    I find it weird how hydrogen, a flammable gas, and oxygen, a flammable gas, when combined create water, a nonflammable substance.
    Edit: Yes, I now know that oxygen isn't flammable.

    • @ar.malavikajayan2485
      @ar.malavikajayan2485 3 роки тому +16

      -ve x -ve = +ve

    • @imtootiredforthis7694
      @imtootiredforthis7694 3 роки тому +12

      @@ar.malavikajayan2485 could you dumb it down please.

    • @waterdoggo4998
      @waterdoggo4998 3 роки тому +50

      @@imtootiredforthis7694 negative x negative = positive
      as flammable x flammable = nonflammable

    • @harishsivaramakrishnan7096
      @harishsivaramakrishnan7096 3 роки тому +16

      @@waterdoggo4998 some brilliant minds here. I feel unqualified to be here actually!

    • @r1konTheAutomator
      @r1konTheAutomator 3 роки тому +30

      Regular ol table salt comes from a mineral that, when exposed to water, bursts into flames and explodes. Take that, mix it with a poisonous gas, and put it in your salt shaker. Chemistry is a hell of a thing

  • @davesuiter
    @davesuiter 2 роки тому +221

    The fire was caused on the skin of the ship due to static electricity; the ship was one giant capacitor. When the hemp rope got wet from the rain, it became a conductor.

    • @Ct.1010
      @Ct.1010 2 роки тому +2

      Yes.

    • @klausrachuy6411
      @klausrachuy6411 Рік тому +4

      That can’t be. The ropes went down quite a while before the explosion.

    • @sixstanger00
      @sixstanger00 Рік тому +9

      I don't think a static discharge would be strong enough to conduct that far. Rope is a very poor conductor, even when wet. It would require a fairly high voltage jolt to travel the length of the hemp rope.
      My speculation is that the ropes were dry, but served as a ground wire. The hemp ropes would've been anchored to something metal at both ends, and the ship-end would've connected to the metal frame somehow, which is far more conductive than than ship's skin. The rain in the storm(s) are probably what caused it to be positively charged inside and out. That's the thing -- just like if you were to stand on a power line, you wouldn't know there's a massive charge passing through you until you grounded yourself.
      The second the hemp ropes hit the ground, the charge has a pathway to the ground.

    • @westzed23
      @westzed23 Рік тому +9

      I heard that the paint used on the airship was extremely flammable and that was one reason the fire spread so fast. Has anyone else heard this?

    • @dbspecials1200
      @dbspecials1200 Рік тому +5

      But there had to be a leak, something explosive has to be ignited by the static charge. the charge is a natural phenom everywhere but you can't have anything flammable in the contact. sometimes we see accidents at fueling stations with static.

  • @stevephlyer
    @stevephlyer Рік тому +7

    Wonderfully produced video, again. So interesting to learn about the internal features of this iconic and gigantic airship. Well done!

  • @melciveng
    @melciveng Рік тому +2

    Excellent graphics and an actual human voiceover ✅

  • @robadams2140
    @robadams2140 3 роки тому +72

    In high school, I was in class preparing to use electrolysis to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen. The teacher explained that when we put a red hot wooden splint inside the test tube with the hydrogen it would explode with a "pop." When one of my classmates asked if hydrogen was explosive I said "Just ask the Hindenburg."

    • @yuribezmenovthegreat4705
      @yuribezmenovthegreat4705 3 роки тому +3

      Idiot that was an elestrostatic effect

    • @samtheking5759
      @samtheking5759 3 роки тому +3

      1 plus 1 is 11

    • @SharamNat1
      @SharamNat1 2 роки тому

      …and ask, why the US had an embargo for Helium for German Zeppelins.

    • @gabrielrousseau_NM
      @gabrielrousseau_NM Рік тому +4

      It didn’t explode so much as the covering was super flammable. The ship also had fuel for the engines and that could be what burnt through to the hydrogen cells which don’t burn very dangerously compared to petroleum fuel but caused lost of lift which allowed many to escape.

  • @18skunk18
    @18skunk18 5 років тому +12

    This Video was fun and very informative. We thank for putting love and passion that makes this documentation Interesting.
    Thank You.

  • @mclover1053
    @mclover1053 2 роки тому +36

    6:30 this was the moment the airship became Hindenburg

  • @mikemcgibney
    @mikemcgibney 9 місяців тому

    Fascinating video, really put everything in perspective. I got a lot out of it - thanks!

  • @Francks_
    @Francks_ 4 роки тому +133

    Fun fact: Led Zeppelin used a picture of Hidenburg on fire in their first album's artwork

    • @esharp3722
      @esharp3722 3 роки тому +11

      the album was released on January 12th, 1969; 32 years after the disaster

    • @lust4power
      @lust4power 3 роки тому +7

      They also got their bands name from a radio station making fun of their band not having a name and said they were going down like a lead zeppelin

    • @DeadwaxTV
      @DeadwaxTV 3 роки тому +10

      @@lust4power Half correct. It was Keith Moon that gave them the idea for the name. Same quote though.

    • @nathanbabiuk6286
      @nathanbabiuk6286 3 роки тому

      Duh

    • @hafiyikhwan6450
      @hafiyikhwan6450 3 роки тому

      what album is it? mothership?

  • @justicewokeisutterbs8641
    @justicewokeisutterbs8641 2 роки тому +17

    A very good presentation, very well produced. I've known about the Hindenburg disaster for decades. It's great to have a more comprehensive understanding of the airship and it's structure. Thanks. 👍

  • @robinl4975
    @robinl4975 5 років тому +6

    This video is simply amazing! So detailed and so much information about this incredible airship!

  • @DD0ULQTC
    @DD0ULQTC 8 місяців тому +3

    Danke für dieses Video. Was oft missverstanden wird: Ja, Helium ist schwerer als Wasserstoff. Wenn wir das vergleichen müssen wir das Gewicht aber gegen Luft (28,949 g/mol) vergleichen. Und dann wirkt Helium (4.003 g/mol) nicht mehr soooo viel schwerer als Wasserstoff (2,01588 g/mol).

  • @tomharriman5051
    @tomharriman5051 3 роки тому +6

    Hi Jared. A few tears ago the PBS show Nova did a episode about this. They pointed out that the Hindenburg had been painted in an aluminum oxide based paint, which is so flammable it's now used in rocket boosters. They made a good case that it was the outside paint that had burned first, them they hydrogen second. So many people surveyed because heat rises. It's an interesting point of view. Tom

  • @Titan52berg
    @Titan52berg 3 роки тому +9

    A very remarkable video with great information! The animation is superbly done, with some of the intricate details of D-LZ129 faithfully recreated to give the viewer an unusual, in-depth, historical journey into the past that is rarely shown; a recreation of high caliber! Sir, you have my extreme gratitude for sharing this incredible documentary with fellow airship enthusiasts!!! Thank You!!!