Agreed! He should've Addressed it, and you're Absolutely Right on Israeli Zionists being Right-Wing Extremists who Engage in Genocide against Palestine and Plundering their Land and Resources while also Commititing Ecocide and other Atrocities that only Benefit the Zionist Extremist State and the Ruling Classes of the Capitalist Imperial Core of the Western World.
I find right wing extremism is largely defined by the mentality of an In group and an Out group. Cos we've seen nationalist and fascist parties in all kinds of countries regardless of race or culture. Like I'd say ISIS/Daesh are fascists, even if they're not white or neo-Nazi. Its all about what gets you in power and what assures your position
Isn't in group and out group thinking part of most forms of extremism though? I would say fascism also always glorifies militarism and traditional masculinity
The current us administration is more fascist then people want to admit. Alot of racial supremacist ideas mixed it. Legal prosecution of political opponents,censoring of speech, Mass arrests of citizens, ect. I think it's clear which racial group they favor ✊🏿
@@semkoopsYeah that's because it's far right which means going back to the past. Left wing would likely mean women superiority but thus far that hasn't truly happened.
@@BaconcatboyActually not at all, feminism by definition seeks the equality of men and women, there are a bunch of schools of thought within feminism such as liberal feminism that seeks equality of representation from a liberal capitalist perspective (as many rich women as rich men or female presidents as often as male presidents for example) or intersectional feminism that theorizes that in order for men and women to be equal, we must tackle the issue of sexism along with every issue of systemic oppression. These schools of thought themselves can intersect but the point is left-wing views on issues regarding gender aren't just "men have always dominated so now women should"
@@steverogers1347 definitely. Like how in the Bible they say that those who do not believe in Christ will not going to meet him in his garden or something. The pattern is awfully similar, and yet these guys are keep pointing their fingers at the other people. How ironic
People don't understand the real definitions of left wing/right wing extremism and even the basic definitions of socialism, national socialism, fascism...due to socialists wanting to distance themselves from the NS and Fascists (who have been able to because a majority of socialists have a foothold in academics), and legacy media's failure to explain the concepts properly (either due to incompetency or political motives). The only differences between lets say "traditional socialism" (Marxism) and National Socialism is regarding a nationalist or internationalist ethos, and if the collective society is based upon that of the worker (Marxism) or a race (in the case of Naz*sm). Racism and anti-Semitism is also not specific to a set of political beliefs (quote Karl Marx's writings and anti-semitism within the soviet union), nor is the preservation of social conservatives values (the Soviet Union, N*zi Germany and China all adhered to preserving traditionally established ideals such as gender based roles, social norms etc). Today there is no grounding of what "left wing" and "right wing" even means in the contemporary times because people are just reiterating the viewpoints of other people. An educated way to look at this is that to be "left wing" is to be collectivist, and to the right is to be individualist...if this is the case then your definitions of the first two concepts collapses as in a matter of fact by practicality, anarchists would be "right wing", and authoritarianism would be attributed to collectivist regimes. left wing historian's and the legacy media have used "3rd Postionalism" and "Hypercapitalism" to defend their labeling, and insist Fascism is distantly seperate. 3rd positionalism does not exist, and when studying N*zi economics (i.e "Gelichschultung"), their use of price controls, nationalisation of industries (i.e lets say the Skoda Works being absorbed into the Hermann-Goering Werke) it's clear the regieme established a command economy. Edit: good work on the rest of the video, I think everything else is fine
Sorry but you're the one completely misunderstanding the left/right divide. This categorization comes from the French parliament before the French revolution. The right-side of the aisle wanted to preserve the monarchy, and the left side wanted reform or abolition of it. As such, left-wing ideologies tend to oppose existing hierarchical power structures in favor of a more egalitarian systems, while right-wing ideologies seek to justify hierarchical power structures as natural/desirable/necessary. So yeah, anarchism and communism are both on the left, have historically and currently understood themselves to be leftist (except for a few current anarchists who consider themselves "post-left") and share pretty similar principles even though their methods diverge (Marx and Bakunin were both part of the First Internationale). Also, anarchists might lean a bit more towards "collectivist" or "individualist" ideas, but often strongly possess both, as these labels aren't as contradictory as they might appear to modern Western sensibilities. Fascism is clearly far-right because it tries to re-establish a mythologized past glory of the nation, based on a rigid hierarchical power-structure. They also tended to uphold the existing upper-classes (monarchy, industrial capitalists, the church etc) and industrial capitalists often used them to get rid of labor movements. Their biggest supporters tended to be right-wing conservative and the Nazis before they were in power consistently sat with the other right-wing parties. Hitler also privatized a lot of government functions when he came to power and initially left the market intact, (he only took more control of it when the war effort needed it). It's absolutely true that authoritarian right and authoritarian left regimes do share certain aspects tho, obviously.
@@Neohehe anarchism developed in the 19th century in the same labor movements where communism developed, and both social-anarchism and individualist-anarchism have deeply leftist roots. Some modern individualist-anarchists call themselves "post-left" anarchists but still believe in the same principles and don't consider themselves right-wing. They're against all authority including state, capital, religious authority, patriarchy etc. "anarcho"-capitalists developed from right-wing libertarian ideas and Austrian economics, and have little connection with the roots of anarchism. They don't want to abolish authority and hierarchical power structures except for the state (but they privatize all the authority structures rather than abolish them). They can call themselves anarchist all they like, but it makes as little sense as Nazis calling themselves socialist or the DPRK calling itself democratic.
@@BlessedCitizen101 I wanted to hold this video more general. I talk about Zionism in other Videos, e.g. the one on Nationalism types. Check out the channel
Zionist ideology is not necessarily extremist, 1990's center-left Israeli PM was open to the Oslo accords for example, he was then killed by an actual extremist zionist who was firmly opposed to any sort of peace with Palestine
So you say terrorism Related to Zionism but not Islamism. News flash,most of terrorist groups globally are Islamist! How many wars right because of Islamist? Even with other Islamist groups? You need edit your video!
Since I'm Anarcho-Communist I'm Technically in the "Left-Wing Extremist" Category. And I emphasise Insurrectionary Anarchism and Synthesis Anarchism [and maybe Especifismo], so that makes sense.
Isn't your pfp a Bookchin Communalism symbol? Not that it matters much cuz these political philosophies are close enough to take inspiration from eahother.
@@KarlSnarks I am a Bookchin Communalist from the sense of Philosophy/Theory and how to Organise Society with SolarPunk Architecture and Federal Communes, and I Agree with your Statement.
@@SPAnComCat Yeah I think where anarchism and Communalism diverge most is that the latter still want to keep the polity form to some extent (Andrewism points it out in one video where he discusses the "demoracy vs anarchism" issue), but other than that both are easily compatible. And yeah Solarpunk is pretty cool :)
Right- extremism was too specific in the explanation. Because Israel has also right wing extremists and then can logically be not antisemitists.
Agreed! He should've Addressed it, and you're Absolutely Right on Israeli Zionists being Right-Wing Extremists who Engage in Genocide against Palestine and Plundering their Land and Resources while also Commititing Ecocide and other Atrocities that only Benefit the Zionist Extremist State and the Ruling Classes of the Capitalist Imperial Core of the Western World.
Wring
Wrong
@@epicepicenter715 You Misspelled it, Whoops! At Least you've Fixed it.
technically zionism does contribute to anti semitism in its own way
Kind of amazing how wrong or just half-cocked half of these descriptions are
So your a leftist?
@@epicepicenter715 how in the world did you even came to that conclusion?
@@adinarapratama5607 witch side? You have to pick one, or a side will pick you
@@epicepicenter715 bro
I follow the ideology of Austrian painters
@@Tom-oj7si -_-/
I find right wing extremism is largely defined by the mentality of an In group and an Out group. Cos we've seen nationalist and fascist parties in all kinds of countries regardless of race or culture. Like I'd say ISIS/Daesh are fascists, even if they're not white or neo-Nazi.
Its all about what gets you in power and what assures your position
Isn't in group and out group thinking part of most forms of extremism though? I would say fascism also always glorifies militarism and traditional masculinity
The current us administration is more fascist then people want to admit. Alot of racial supremacist ideas mixed it. Legal prosecution of political opponents,censoring of speech, Mass arrests of citizens, ect. I think it's clear which racial group they favor ✊🏿
@@semkoopsYeah that's because it's far right which means going back to the past. Left wing would likely mean women superiority but thus far that hasn't truly happened.
@@BaconcatboyActually not at all, feminism by definition seeks the equality of men and women, there are a bunch of schools of thought within feminism such as liberal feminism that seeks equality of representation from a liberal capitalist perspective (as many rich women as rich men or female presidents as often as male presidents for example) or intersectional feminism that theorizes that in order for men and women to be equal, we must tackle the issue of sexism along with every issue of systemic oppression. These schools of thought themselves can intersect but the point is left-wing views on issues regarding gender aren't just "men have always dominated so now women should"
@@imarandomperson761 True but I was referring to the far left. Not the moderate Liberal left.
is declaring others as "non believers" really the biggest criticism made of islamic fundamentalism?
@@NakisIsUnfunny Absolutely not, guess you could make a whole video on only this topic.
All of the points listed can be applied to basically all the religions shown.
@@steverogers1347Islam is the only religion that actively advocates violence against Jews / disbelievers.
@@steverogers1347 definitely. Like how in the Bible they say that those who do not believe in Christ will not going to meet him in his garden or something.
The pattern is awfully similar, and yet these guys are keep pointing their fingers at the other people. How ironic
@@ItsDainsleifDuh And at each other 😂
It's surprising to see a person who's not necessarily left-wing describing left-wing ideologies so accurately
People don't understand the real definitions of left wing/right wing extremism and even the basic definitions of socialism, national socialism, fascism...due to socialists wanting to distance themselves from the NS and Fascists (who have been able to because a majority of socialists have a foothold in academics), and legacy media's failure to explain the concepts properly (either due to incompetency or political motives). The only differences between lets say "traditional socialism" (Marxism) and National Socialism is regarding a nationalist or internationalist ethos, and if the collective society is based upon that of the worker (Marxism) or a race (in the case of Naz*sm). Racism and anti-Semitism is also not specific to a set of political beliefs (quote Karl Marx's writings and anti-semitism within the soviet union), nor is the preservation of social conservatives values (the Soviet Union, N*zi Germany and China all adhered to preserving traditionally established ideals such as gender based roles, social norms etc).
Today there is no grounding of what "left wing" and "right wing" even means in the contemporary times because people are just reiterating the viewpoints of other people. An educated way to look at this is that to be "left wing" is to be collectivist, and to the right is to be individualist...if this is the case then your definitions of the first two concepts collapses as in a matter of fact by practicality, anarchists would be "right wing", and authoritarianism would be attributed to collectivist regimes.
left wing historian's and the legacy media have used "3rd Postionalism" and "Hypercapitalism" to defend their labeling, and insist Fascism is distantly seperate. 3rd positionalism does not exist, and when studying N*zi economics (i.e "Gelichschultung"), their use of price controls, nationalisation of industries (i.e lets say the Skoda Works being absorbed into the Hermann-Goering Werke) it's clear the regieme established a command economy.
Edit: good work on the rest of the video, I think everything else is fine
yeah I agree with this definition bc there's both left-anarchists and right-anarchists according to his video right-anarchism doesn't exist
Yeah, it's harder and harder to distinguish between the "wings", I agree.
Sorry but you're the one completely misunderstanding the left/right divide. This categorization comes from the French parliament before the French revolution. The right-side of the aisle wanted to preserve the monarchy, and the left side wanted reform or abolition of it. As such, left-wing ideologies tend to oppose existing hierarchical power structures in favor of a more egalitarian systems, while right-wing ideologies seek to justify hierarchical power structures as natural/desirable/necessary. So yeah, anarchism and communism are both on the left, have historically and currently understood themselves to be leftist (except for a few current anarchists who consider themselves "post-left") and share pretty similar principles even though their methods diverge (Marx and Bakunin were both part of the First Internationale). Also, anarchists might lean a bit more towards "collectivist" or "individualist" ideas, but often strongly possess both, as these labels aren't as contradictory as they might appear to modern Western sensibilities.
Fascism is clearly far-right because it tries to re-establish a mythologized past glory of the nation, based on a rigid hierarchical power-structure. They also tended to uphold the existing upper-classes (monarchy, industrial capitalists, the church etc) and industrial capitalists often used them to get rid of labor movements. Their biggest supporters tended to be right-wing conservative and the Nazis before they were in power consistently sat with the other right-wing parties. Hitler also privatized a lot of government functions when he came to power and initially left the market intact, (he only took more control of it when the war effort needed it).
It's absolutely true that authoritarian right and authoritarian left regimes do share certain aspects tho, obviously.
@@Neohehe anarchism developed in the 19th century in the same labor movements where communism developed, and both social-anarchism and individualist-anarchism have deeply leftist roots. Some modern individualist-anarchists call themselves "post-left" anarchists but still believe in the same principles and don't consider themselves right-wing. They're against all authority including state, capital, religious authority, patriarchy etc.
"anarcho"-capitalists developed from right-wing libertarian ideas and Austrian economics, and have little connection with the roots of anarchism. They don't want to abolish authority and hierarchical power structures except for the state (but they privatize all the authority structures rather than abolish them). They can call themselves anarchist all they like, but it makes as little sense as Nazis calling themselves socialist or the DPRK calling itself democratic.
@@KarlSnarks just bc something develops out of something doesn't means it's doesn't line up in enough ways to be close
Where is Zionism??
@@BlessedCitizen101 I wanted to hold this video more general. I talk about Zionism in other Videos, e.g. the one on Nationalism types. Check out the channel
@ExplainersEnigma I'll definitely have to check it out, I've been hooked on your videos the past 2 days. Great work, keep it up! 👍💯
@melissawilkinson2636 glad you like them Melissa ❤️
Zionist ideology is not necessarily extremist, 1990's center-left Israeli PM was open to the Oslo accords for example, he was then killed by an actual extremist zionist who was firmly opposed to any sort of peace with Palestine
So you say terrorism
Related to Zionism but not Islamism. News flash,most of terrorist groups globally are Islamist! How many wars right because of Islamist? Even with other Islamist groups? You need edit your video!
👃
It isn't extremism to believe the eternal laws of nature should trump man made ideologies.
What laws of nature are we talking? Interesting profile pic by the way, is that a Valknut?
Left-wing falloff needs to be studied 😂
Falloff?
You mean eradicated
third position isnt right wing
So you mean it's common sense
Do all forms of Totalitarianism.
I did all forms of Authoritarianism, check out the channel, that covers it pretty much I'd say.
dislike the fact you forgot anarchism is also split by left and right
if you're refering to anarcho capitalism then ur wrong since anarcho capitalism is NOT anarchism
@@oklol9245 yet it also depends what you define as anarchism
@@oklol9245 and I define anarchism as opposition to the state in general
@@Neohehe stateless horizontally built society. capitalism is hierarchichal in its core
@@oklol9245 yet anarchism on it's own just tells you what you're against which is the state
where is nihilistic?
@@mu2p I covered Nihilism in a video on every major philosophical thought. Check out the channel 👍
Next vid about all type of phobia
8:21 look like Afghanistan
What about maga?
This is outdated
How so?
Not right wing extremism, thats authoritarian extremism which even the center-left can have
Reactionaryism is based.
Since I'm Anarcho-Communist I'm Technically in the "Left-Wing Extremist" Category.
And I emphasise Insurrectionary Anarchism and Synthesis Anarchism [and maybe Especifismo], so that makes sense.
gay
Isn't your pfp a Bookchin Communalism symbol? Not that it matters much cuz these political philosophies are close enough to take inspiration from eahother.
@@KarlSnarks I am a Bookchin Communalist from the sense of Philosophy/Theory and how to Organise Society with SolarPunk Architecture and Federal Communes, and I Agree with your Statement.
@@SPAnComCat Yeah I think where anarchism and Communalism diverge most is that the latter still want to keep the polity form to some extent (Andrewism points it out in one video where he discusses the "demoracy vs anarchism" issue), but other than that both are easily compatible. And yeah Solarpunk is pretty cool :)
@@KarlSnarks Agreed.