Exactly. MGTOW is the only way. Women always portray themselves as defenseless but in today's culture they've been given extraordinary power in the workplace. As a man in the workplace you are in shark infested water and women are the sharks. Keep your interactions with women to a minimum (short, curt, and professional) and always try to have another person in the room when you're interacting with women. Like you said one allegation is enough to ruin your life.
*"An Innocent person should always be angry or fight it and be angry-"* Yet if men, including myself in all including pettier cases, in the USA get mad, then we are told we must be guilty. *"Why would you get upset and mad or make a scene or argue it so much, unless you ARE guilty!"* *Lose:Lose situation for us in my country.* No matter what the situation, we have lost all our rights to fight the judicial system. *Especially against women in court.*
Can this be applied to the Tanushree Dutta case? Just because a girl is speaking out and crying about it doesn't establish its viability. There are always made up facts
I think women who do this are horrible hyenas who should absolutely be held accountable for what they do and I totally support the men's rights movement. But at the same time everytime something happens we cannot want to believe that the "victim" is always wrong. Due process means we have to listen before we judge.
Having been in the position of being falsely accused, I can tell you that this woman does not know what she is talking about. "The accused person would be outraged... why are you asking me these questions?" No. I was terrified. I remained as calm as I could, I did not get angry. I just remained as calm as I could and answered all questions as they were asked. My accuser gave herself away by telling conflicting stories and making accusations that could be easily disproven using forensics and other tests. Oh, the great bit - she is still out in society and wasn't prosecuted for what she did.
I'm so sorry man that this happened to you. This right here is the reason it's so common, they do it because they know they won't face ANY consequences. Our society has rotten to the core...
This is a good video which focused on detecting fake harassment cases. it is really necessary to indentify fake people, I think Kanan Tandi did a great job ...I feel even famous faces can make a mistake Miss.Tandi just identified it because of her skills and this video is worth appreciating
The lesson here is to just work from home, if that is an available option at your job. While you’re at it, don’t bother casually making small talk with anyone via the company DM/chat system. Only chat with coworkers if it’s a work-related question. Basically, just stay away from the office and keep to yourself.
@@Pundit07 My question to my co workers was work related but it's a long story which became a nightmare. 7 years passed but this still haunts me and I refrain strongly talking to women co-workers alone .
My main complaint about this is that detecting lies through body language is super situational. That Michael Jackson clip looked like a person who had been dealing with absurd accusations for a very long time, and got asked a question everyone in the room knew was not a legally acceptable question to ask.
Michele is a professional and as most professionals you try to keep you cool... he seemed shocked but at the same time trying to be a professional about it
Her analysis of the Michael Jackson case was pretty sloppy, and generally of analysing accused people. Plenty of guilty people defend themselves with anger. As for Jackson, I think its very worth to consider that he saw McCulkin a friend (according to Jackson), so he probably met his family too; the notion of people you supposedly know falsely accusing you for money wouldn't necessarily make a guy like Jackson react with anger. He always acts really timid when I've seen him talk. It's more logical, to me, that he'd be hurt rather than angry in those circumstances. I think it's important to consider the person's character, and the variations of circumstances, when doing these kinds of analyses. She didn't filter in any of that.
Oddivia Exactly..!! We are humans and we all have different traits. Not all humans react in the same way. One can't judge another just by looking at his/her actions. Whatever she said is nothing but baseless assumptions.
But if you guys understand anything about justice/judicial system,, it all works on basis of some set of procedure and methods so as to solve the case ... they dont have time to research about someones individual traits...same as there are formulae made in physics to help solve problems easily and not prove whole concept each time
The idea is good to tackle this issue, but an accused person does not have to be necessarily angry. I asked the accuser to prove it, but they held back every piece of evidence.
*VICTIM* 1. *Eye movement* - cognitive overload , figuring out details 2 *Expression* - fear,shame . Eyebrows stretced ,eyes widen 3 *articulated answers* - what happens next 4. *Want's faith sympathy* - equal amount of tears, to running nose *ABUSER* 1. *Innocent* - would have rage ,angry mode Acute anger , disgusted 2. *Real victim* - I m really hurt , what can of person you think I am are - RAGE Media trial - *Shiney Ahuja* Very interesting insights,where can I have more thoughts on this subject
great video👍 I think we would definitely save ourselves from all the lies people tend to tell. If only we would focus on their body language rather than on their sugar coated words.
When a person who is lying could easily act angry. And a Innocent person can still stay calm but be angry inside. You can’t use body language to decide If someone is lying or telling the truth. There are a lot of people who don’t get emotional.
It should be told that all assumptions about normal behaviors here told can be very wrong in many specific cases like people with autistic disorders. Not looking straight in the eyes is a very common autistic trait, like not remembering at all or remembering a lot of details, not showing facial expression, not showing anger or excessive wrath, etc. It is also a problem to understand the behavior of the alleged aggressor if having autistic traits, for instance severe anxiety disorders are very common too, and an innocent may look guilty. If these behavioral assumptions may be most often true (it has to be scientifically observed to be sure of that), but believing in them may contribute to reject real victims and condemn real innocents. And it is not a light exception, aggression on autistic people are very common, like false accusations against them, because they can be very trustful, or even very naive, don't understand implied suggestions, and so constitute victims of choice for aggression, either psychological/physical abuses or false accusation.
Actually, people don't react the same way to a shock. In some cases, some people may even show too much outrage which in some ways may indicate guilt. Some liars tend to get very loud when accused, in an attempt to mask their shame. So we must be careful not a cover everyone under the same umbrella... just saying
She's wrong about Michael Jackson. The *obvious* thing to do is to protest your innocence. He is embarrassed and his reaction comes across as totally authentic. Watch again. This is a real reaction - we can at least say this. He is not lying here. You may decide he is guilty, but isn't this a strange response from a man who is accused of a serious crime?
I agree with first video but with second one... Disagreed! Reading body language in order to deduct the crime is situational. People behave differently in different situations under different circumstances I myself would be calm and stoic in Q & A situations rather than bursting into anger cause that's not my usual behavior Also MJ is innocent, he's laughing cause he'd been accused of child molestation over and over since 1988. Your problem is that you're basing this off of one interview of MJ. He was shy and calm guy who couldn't bring himself to kiss Diana Ross when she approached him
@homie beaglePG there's an answer to that too... Look up for a documentary called "Square One" on UA-cam. It debunks all the claims made against Michael Jackson since 1993 with proof and recipes Edit: plus look at all the other interviews of Michael Jackson... He very confidently answered and addressed the accusations very calmly... Because that's his behavior and demeanor And I stand by my statement, I'd be calm and stoic, I'm not the kind who easily gets provoked or act out in anger because "dialogue leads to consensus" - *Dr. Jordan Peterson* :D
I agree with some of what you say. But please research Narcissistic Personality Disorder and how people with it respond to criticism or behave when called out on their transgressions. The response you described for the innocently accused is exactly how malignant narcissists respond when questioned or caught. Following ur entire guideline will be very disastrous for people dealing with toxic people who are faking crimes or offenses.
I respect her. But don't think her method of finding the truth based on body language is 100% foolproof. A man who enjoys life in face of adversity, will have a completely different body language than a normal person, when accused... or any situation in life
This video only has 50k views, even though I have subscribed to Tedx and I watch these kinds of videos, UA-cam has never shown me this video nor did they sent me notification. I found this by searching about fake harrasment cases(because I was trying to provide evidence to one of my peers about fake cases). They will probably delete this comment too.
Alas, reading body language is even less reliable than polygraphs (which have been shown scientifically to be too unreliable to be accepted in courts in the US). It *can* give some clues at times; it's not 100% invalid. But it assumes way to much uniformity; humans vary a LOT in how they handle trauma. One person being accused may get angry, another may be sad or anxious, depending on their personality and life experience, and the current context. There is no universally accurate stereotype about these things. She also says things like when we meet somebody and have a bad feeling, this is due to our picking up that their body language is weird and there is something wrong. But it could also be that they unconsciously remind us of somebody we personally disliked, perhaps even as a young child. And our friend may like this person - who is right? She gives this concept way too much credence. So like other "clues", it is suggestive at best and needs to be confirmed or disconfirmed by other means. It would be interesting to see Ms Tandi submit to controlled scientific experiements to validate her reliability. Is she right 30% of the time, 50% of the time, 70% of the time, 90% of the time? And at what level of reliability should be our threshold in criminal cases? Sorry, its mostly pseudo-science, with a bit of good sense mixed in. It would be great for the world if we COULD reliably detect truth and lies in ordinary people, but so far that goal eludes our best science. And even then, we'd have the problem of psychopaths and others with serious disorders whose brains are different, for whom a lie doesn't have the same impact even unconsciously. If not one iota of your being, at the brain level, believes that lying is somehow wrong - you won't have the same physiological responses.
A good introduction to the domain of Body Language analysis here...your talk gives a good rudimentary understanding of the subject at hand... This is something one encounters in daily life, and knowing whats the other is upto would always be handy...
In India we have gynocentric laws rather than gender equality laws kyun ki vote ka sawal hai...In our country a man is guilty until proven innocent and a girl is innocent until proven guilty. In India a man respect doesn't matter as everyone shows his photo as rapists even it's not proven.
I'm very surprised that the other side of the story would be on a TED video, or anything about the issue of people using false accusations for financial or custody reasons or for just hatred or revenge. But maybe it is because it is a TEDx , not TED.
I m harassed by a lady but I m a man so chup hi rehna padega mujy ..... medicine lera hu mental torture ki but justice mujy milega ni I know so kya kary .......sary neta judge wakeel powerful log sirf ladkiyo ki sunty hai.........or jadatar purush chedchusak hai mahila mahila karty hai..
She is having a very illogical points. All human beings are different and they react differently at any situation depanding on their personality (introvert or exterovert), upbringings, education, culture and several other factors. So stop judging a person through your limited perception....
Anyone can please suggest community which can help in case of fake alligation by a lady.Please provide contact details if any. We are facing the problem of fake alligation. Thanks
while this behaviour and psychological analysis is true....we cant go to conclusion on this basis only as we need further proofs and evidence for the case as this is only a part of process of finding the truth . people will react similarly but not exactly same(remember there are sociopaths and psychopaths too).but this is an informative knowledge to help us as audience to be more practical about these cases being portrayed on media. so there is no need to get angry on the comments.
What is sad about falsely accusing someone u are ruining there life and u may discredit someone who accuses someone who is guilty and nobody will believe somebody who is telling the truth.
This woman is part of the problem, perpetuating disproven “science.” Look up phrenology: it was something once considered science too, but has been disproven even longer than “body language” theory has been.
While men are often falsely accused, this lecture is very amateurish and not scientific. Lying is often difficult to detect. Some liars are more convincing than truth tellers. Often, honest people, when accused of a crime, are emotionally traumatized and as a consequence of severe stress, appear nervous and guilty when, in fact, they are innocent.
I am not a fake person to my core . Being truthful is my proud essence in life. But, “does one eye ‘cry’ first (that part I can believe), but she continues, “with evidence of the other eye has cried before or after “???! I am EMBARRASSED to cry . But I am positive that when I went to a washroom to clean any evidence of tears - that I was washing tears from both eyes - both eyes puffy. SO WHATTTT... is this teaching??? (By 7:32 minutes). That a woman with 2 puffy eyes and tears from both eyes , unless caught in the first 15 second initiation act of involuntarily starting to cry - is FAKING??! I am a woman who can’t stand when women fake abuses . This is why I listened. But I am not trying to become victim to pseudoscience. If US FBI agents can admit that human ability to detect lying is largely fallible - why would this speaker be ANY different , especially when I was willing to support (open mind) but found myself alarmed , having experienced veraciously physical traits , she describes as “untruthful”. Sometimes - tears have run down from both eyes at same time. What about if you’ve lost a loved one??! This makes you a liarrr??? This is terribly and laughably not so. It knocks down women, instead of empowering them, while also “proving” their truths might be lies. Use real science and studies please. FYI - I’m a woman who’s been bullied by other women. They’re not innocent. But unverified science empowers WOMEN AND MALE ABUSERS... not female victims.
How about we gather evidence and we present them in court? The way we do with all crimes with a high degree of gravity? Just saying this because I have anxiety and if someone brings me to court for any reason my soul is gonna watch the whole deal from the ethereal plane.
So many cases where people who showed anger at being accused and threatened legal action, turned out to be culprits. This woman is full of crazy theories!
This Talk was very good. A good presentation. I just have one point to make. You can't go entirely by body language. I am sure this is known. I don't know the result of Michael Jackson's case. In light of my point, people with plastic surgery have constrained facial movements. This was the case with someone who underwent a plastic surgery. He was injured on the face. He had a plastic surgery done. He said that very often his innocent smile was mistaken for sarcasm. He even told people that he had difficulty because of the injury and that the restricted facial movements were due to the plastic surgery. There is also the cultural aspect to body language such as passive-aggressive and a plethora of incidents which can lead to some unique gestures, peculiar to others. Please keep that in mind.
Need updated research and discussion on how to detect lies on the internet in terms of text allegations. How to detect a typed up lie. That being said, some of this sounds like a bit of a reach.
Analysis of body language is useful but it shouldn't be sole evidence instead it could be a supporting evidence. Because the science behind body language is not absolute and 100% accurate.
I get the point she's trying to make. But I don't agree with her generalisations on body language, people might have different reactions for the same incident, body language can differ from person to person. You can see anger in someone's face when they're angry, while some are very good at covering it. "The way you will be behaving, is the exact same way the victim would be behaving". That's not true all the time, I am sorry. Purpose of this video is noble but the content is very contentious.
I don't agree with her on response of a person who is innocent... it is not that way... a person can have low voice you can be disgusted but wht can you do??? its ur words against a person in authority or boss for ladies will be heard .. men they wont be
Even just allegations is enough for destroying men's life
Why men's face is shown if charges are not proved ? Because to shame men in society.
Exactly. MGTOW is the only way. Women always portray themselves as defenseless but in today's culture they've been given extraordinary power in the workplace. As a man in the workplace you are in shark infested water and women are the sharks. Keep your interactions with women to a minimum (short, curt, and professional) and always try to have another person in the room when you're interacting with women. Like you said one allegation is enough to ruin your life.
@@RiseUpToYourAbility how about a better solution,start stepping up to the scrotes who are harrasi g the women..
@@vango4307 part of the problem much?
@@vango4307 Considering most of them are false how about a no.
@@rickycool6083 valid source ??
*"An Innocent person should always be angry or fight it and be angry-"*
Yet if men, including myself in all including pettier cases, in the USA get mad, then we are told we must be guilty. *"Why would you get upset and mad or make a scene or argue it so much, unless you ARE guilty!"*
*Lose:Lose situation for us in my country.* No matter what the situation, we have lost all our rights to fight the judicial system. *Especially against women in court.*
Thank you for saying that. People react differently to situations there is no manual for these situations.
It's amazing how many cops say the person behaved unusually. Unfortunately everyone responds differently. This is not reliable data
Can this be applied to the Tanushree Dutta case? Just because a girl is speaking out and crying about it doesn't establish its viability. There are always made up facts
To be fair she did try to do it in 2008 but it wasn't taken up.
@@hotsingleplaguedoctorinarea she's fake
@@hotsingleplaguedoctorinarea who?
I think women who do this are horrible hyenas who should absolutely be held accountable for what they do and I totally support the men's rights movement. But at the same time everytime something happens we cannot want to believe that the "victim" is always wrong. Due process means we have to listen before we judge.
@@NidzShah-ps6kr very wise answer
Having been in the position of being falsely accused, I can tell you that this woman does not know what she is talking about. "The accused person would be outraged... why are you asking me these questions?"
No. I was terrified. I remained as calm as I could, I did not get angry. I just remained as calm as I could and answered all questions as they were asked.
My accuser gave herself away by telling conflicting stories and making accusations that could be easily disproven using forensics and other tests.
Oh, the great bit - she is still out in society and wasn't prosecuted for what she did.
I'm so sorry man that this happened to you. This right here is the reason it's so common, they do it because they know they won't face ANY consequences. Our society has rotten to the core...
Be careful of the "angry people are innocent" idea. I've seen alot of liars get all angry and put on a show.
No. It's actually true in my case
This is a good video which focused on detecting fake harassment cases. it is really necessary to indentify fake people, I think Kanan Tandi did a great job ...I feel even famous faces can make a mistake Miss.Tandi just identified it because of her skills and this video is worth appreciating
I've gone though this in office. It screwed up my career big time. I wish I never worked there.
I'm sorry to hear that :( my friend is currently going through this by a woman at his work.
@@Cinderbellieeeee the only way out is staying strong. Nothing helps here.
The lesson here is to just work from home, if that is an available option at your job. While you’re at it, don’t bother casually making small talk with anyone via the company DM/chat system. Only chat with coworkers if it’s a work-related question. Basically, just stay away from the office and keep to yourself.
@@Pundit07 My question to my co workers was work related but it's a long story which became a nightmare. 7 years passed but this still haunts me and I refrain strongly talking to women co-workers alone .
@@djaishik please share your contact @my 9999805019 to get help from you in this regard.... Thanks
I dont think so an innocent person will react angrily or aggressivly...
Discomfort is more an important emotion might be an exception.
My main complaint about this is that detecting lies through body language is super situational. That Michael Jackson clip looked like a person who had been dealing with absurd accusations for a very long time, and got asked a question everyone in the room knew was not a legally acceptable question to ask.
THANK YOU!! Someone finally said that, MJ was innocent
Exactly! This wasnt his first time being asked that question. He has clearly heard it all before to the point it became absurd.
A woman who sees that men are humans *and* can pronounce harassed correctly. Wow
🤣
Ikr some privileged bitches smh
She did not say the word correctly.
@@maurice2014 the emphasis is meant to be, and is on, the first syllable.
This is the only woman that can explain stuff correctly.
Michele is a professional and as most professionals you try to keep you cool... he seemed shocked but at the same time trying to be a professional about it
Her analysis of the Michael Jackson case was pretty sloppy, and generally of analysing accused people. Plenty of guilty people defend themselves with anger. As for Jackson, I think its very worth to consider that he saw McCulkin a friend (according to Jackson), so he probably met his family too; the notion of people you supposedly know falsely accusing you for money wouldn't necessarily make a guy like Jackson react with anger. He always acts really timid when I've seen him talk. It's more logical, to me, that he'd be hurt rather than angry in those circumstances. I think it's important to consider the person's character, and the variations of circumstances, when doing these kinds of analyses. She didn't filter in any of that.
Oddivia Exactly..!! We are humans and we all have different traits. Not all humans react in the same way. One can't judge another just by looking at his/her actions. Whatever she said is nothing but baseless assumptions.
I began writing THIS comment and stopped to check if anyone's written it already. Thanks dude.
But if you guys understand anything about justice/judicial system,, it all works on basis of some set of procedure and methods so as to solve the case ... they dont have time to research about someones individual traits...same as there are formulae made in physics to help solve problems easily and not prove whole concept each time
Thanks Kanan. very topical and very essential for all of to know.. we can't be just onlookers in a society..
Well said for the whole world respect
The idea is good to tackle this issue, but an accused person does not have to be necessarily angry. I asked the accuser to prove it, but they held back every piece of evidence.
130 Feminists disliked the video.
and 24 XDDDDDDD
And it's now 47.
Deadass_Isaac_2001 now 48
It's 61 now.
I have disliked
*VICTIM*
1. *Eye movement* - cognitive overload , figuring out details
2 *Expression* - fear,shame . Eyebrows stretced ,eyes widen
3 *articulated answers* - what happens next
4. *Want's faith sympathy* -
equal amount of tears, to running nose
*ABUSER*
1. *Innocent* - would have rage ,angry mode
Acute anger , disgusted
2. *Real victim* - I m really hurt , what can of person you think I am are - RAGE
Media trial - *Shiney Ahuja*
Very interesting insights,where can I have more thoughts on this subject
great video👍
I think we would definitely save ourselves from all the lies people tend to tell. If only we would focus on their body language rather than on their sugar coated words.
but wasnt MJ inoccent? also is body language not culture dependent? ...
No MJ was not innocent.
The housekeeper was horrified that she did not say anything when she had the chance.
@@bskee001 MJ was indeed innocent.
Peaches Kong he was found by the JURY to be innocent, but I don’t believe he was really innocent.
@@fudgefactor1639 he was declared not guilty by a jury
I think it's amazing that we have started a proper due process to fix this. In my company we have already applied it.
If your video goes in wrong women can it also be dangerous??
When a person who is lying could easily act angry. And a Innocent person can still stay calm but be angry inside. You can’t use body language to decide If someone is lying or telling the truth. There are a lot of people who don’t get emotional.
It should be told that all assumptions about normal behaviors here told can be very wrong in many specific cases like people with autistic disorders. Not looking straight in the eyes is a very common autistic trait, like not remembering at all or remembering a lot of details, not showing facial expression, not showing anger or excessive wrath, etc. It is also a problem to understand the behavior of the alleged aggressor if having autistic traits, for instance severe anxiety disorders are very common too, and an innocent may look guilty.
If these behavioral assumptions may be most often true (it has to be scientifically observed to be sure of that), but believing in them may contribute to reject real victims and condemn real innocents. And it is not a light exception, aggression on autistic people are very common, like false accusations against them, because they can be very trustful, or even very naive, don't understand implied suggestions, and so constitute victims of choice for aggression, either psychological/physical abuses or false accusation.
Actually, people don't react the same way to a shock. In some cases, some people may even show too much outrage which in some ways may indicate guilt. Some liars tend to get very loud when accused, in an attempt to mask their shame. So we must be careful not a cover everyone under the same umbrella... just saying
She's wrong about Michael Jackson. The *obvious* thing to do is to protest your innocence. He is embarrassed and his reaction comes across as totally authentic. Watch again. This is a real reaction - we can at least say this. He is not lying here. You may decide he is guilty, but isn't this a strange response from a man who is accused of a serious crime?
You made us cry, madam!!!!
I totally agree with her, thumbs up
Sensible explanation...well said proud of u
Facts don't care about the feelings
ben shapiro fan ditected
She killed it
nice critical thinking , respect,,
This girl is brave, I am surprised she has not been accused of regressive ideas 😀
I agree with first video but with second one... Disagreed! Reading body language in order to deduct the crime is situational. People behave differently in different situations under different circumstances
I myself would be calm and stoic in Q & A situations rather than bursting into anger cause that's not my usual behavior
Also MJ is innocent, he's laughing cause he'd been accused of child molestation over and over since 1988. Your problem is that you're basing this off of one interview of MJ. He was shy and calm guy who couldn't bring himself to kiss Diana Ross when she approached him
@homie beaglePG there's an answer to that too... Look up for a documentary called "Square One" on UA-cam. It debunks all the claims made against Michael Jackson since 1993 with proof and recipes
Edit: plus look at all the other interviews of Michael Jackson... He very confidently answered and addressed the accusations very calmly... Because that's his behavior and demeanor
And I stand by my statement, I'd be calm and stoic, I'm not the kind who easily gets provoked or act out in anger because
"dialogue leads to consensus" - *Dr. Jordan Peterson* :D
People react differently. I don't believe that you can judge if someone is guilty based on reaction. This is how the innocent get locked up.
There is no strict rulebook for human behavior.. Common guidelines are fine.. But the best result always comes from experiences.
Mam I need your help
I agree with some of what you say. But please research Narcissistic Personality Disorder and how people with it respond to criticism or behave when called out on their transgressions. The response you described for the innocently accused is exactly how malignant narcissists respond when questioned or caught. Following ur entire guideline will be very disastrous for people dealing with toxic people who are faking crimes or offenses.
Can This apply to high school.
I respect her. But don't think her method of finding the truth based on body language is 100% foolproof. A man who enjoys life in face of adversity, will have a completely different body language than a normal person, when accused... or any situation in life
This video only has 50k views, even though I have subscribed to Tedx and I watch these kinds of videos, UA-cam has never shown me this video nor did they sent me notification. I found this by searching about fake harrasment cases(because I was trying to provide evidence to one of my peers about fake cases). They will probably delete this comment too.
Alas, reading body language is even less reliable than polygraphs (which have been shown scientifically to be too unreliable to be accepted in courts in the US). It *can* give some clues at times; it's not 100% invalid. But it assumes way to much uniformity; humans vary a LOT in how they handle trauma. One person being accused may get angry, another may be sad or anxious, depending on their personality and life experience, and the current context. There is no universally accurate stereotype about these things.
She also says things like when we meet somebody and have a bad feeling, this is due to our picking up that their body language is weird and there is something wrong. But it could also be that they unconsciously remind us of somebody we personally disliked, perhaps even as a young child. And our friend may like this person - who is right? She gives this concept way too much credence.
So like other "clues", it is suggestive at best and needs to be confirmed or disconfirmed by other means.
It would be interesting to see Ms Tandi submit to controlled scientific experiements to validate her reliability. Is she right 30% of the time, 50% of the time, 70% of the time, 90% of the time? And at what level of reliability should be our threshold in criminal cases?
Sorry, its mostly pseudo-science, with a bit of good sense mixed in. It would be great for the world if we COULD reliably detect truth and lies in ordinary people, but so far that goal eludes our best science. And even then, we'd have the problem of psychopaths and others with serious disorders whose brains are different, for whom a lie doesn't have the same impact even unconsciously. If not one iota of your being, at the brain level, believes that lying is somehow wrong - you won't have the same physiological responses.
This one needs to continue preaching this.
Thanks for speaking the Truth.
It’s reassuring that there is insight
The person can go quite.. He may not shout as you are saying. He will be angry but can go silent
A good introduction to the domain of Body Language analysis here...your talk gives a good rudimentary understanding of the subject at hand...
This is something one encounters in daily life, and knowing whats the other is upto would always be handy...
Respect from maharashtra
There is a gap between accused and guilty and that gap become invisible in India. In India guilty = accused
Her psychological assessment is invalid!
Not even a single woman here who support's this reality
Innocent peole will be more angry
Hope you understand.. So
If you become defensive with U.S. Customs or the Secret Service. They assume that you may be guilty.
In India we have gynocentric laws rather than gender equality laws kyun ki vote ka sawal hai...In our country a man is guilty until proven innocent and a girl is innocent until proven guilty. In India a man respect doesn't matter as everyone shows his photo as rapists even it's not proven.
I'm very surprised that the other side of the story would be on a TED video, or anything about the issue of people using false accusations for financial or custody reasons or for just hatred or revenge. But maybe it is because it is a TEDx , not TED.
Now those girls will never talk about ATM cards mobile phones after watching this video
English speaker plays foreign language video as critical part of presentation. BRILLIANT🤦🏾♂️
cuz the audience is all indian and understands hindi,,, but she could have added subtitles
I m harassed by a lady but I m a man so chup hi rehna padega mujy ..... medicine lera hu mental torture ki but justice mujy milega ni I know so kya kary .......sary neta judge wakeel powerful log sirf ladkiyo ki sunty hai.........or jadatar purush chedchusak hai mahila mahila karty hai..
Same thing happened to me bro I used to take deppresing medicine now I think my life is gone by her flase statement
She is having a very illogical points. All human beings are different and they react differently at any situation depanding on their personality (introvert or exterovert), upbringings, education, culture and several other factors. So stop judging a person through your limited perception....
I thanks to God for not getting framed in my life.
Feeling bad for other innocent ppl
Hi...plz can anyone help me?? My son is facing the same situation
I'm sorry to hear :( what happened to your son's situation?
Get professional help.
Please get a lawyer. You need to fight fire with fire
Kahi se kuchh solution mila apko son k baare me@9999805019, pl reply
which part of india are u located
Anyone can please suggest community which can help in case of fake alligation by a lady.Please provide contact details if any. We are facing the problem of fake alligation.
Thanks
theres some extreme generalization here
while this behaviour and psychological analysis is true....we cant go to conclusion on this basis only as we need further proofs and evidence for the case as this is only a part of process of finding the truth . people will react similarly but not exactly same(remember there are sociopaths and psychopaths too).but this is an informative knowledge to help us as audience to be more practical about these cases being portrayed on media. so there is no need to get angry on the comments.
Mam l need your help
What is sad about falsely accusing someone u are ruining there life and u may discredit someone who accuses someone who is guilty and nobody will believe somebody who is telling the truth.
Kanan also Canaan meaning land of promise, meaning she is the land of promise, meaning she is a dream!
Very well explained.
This woman is part of the problem, perpetuating disproven “science.” Look up phrenology: it was something once considered science too, but has been disproven even longer than “body language” theory has been.
Absolute nonsensical reasoning and judgement. The falsely accused victim can be angry and sad that he has been victimised; not necessarily just angry.
While men are often falsely accused, this lecture is very amateurish and not scientific. Lying is often difficult to detect. Some liars are more convincing than truth tellers. Often, honest people, when accused of a crime, are emotionally traumatized and as a consequence of severe stress, appear nervous and guilty when, in fact, they are innocent.
I am not a fake person to my core . Being truthful is my proud essence in life.
But, “does one eye ‘cry’ first (that part I can believe), but she continues, “with evidence of the other eye has cried before or after “???!
I am EMBARRASSED to cry .
But I am positive that when I went to a washroom to clean any evidence of tears - that I was washing tears from both eyes - both eyes puffy.
SO WHATTTT... is this teaching??? (By 7:32 minutes). That a woman with 2 puffy eyes and tears from both eyes , unless caught in the first 15 second initiation act of involuntarily starting to cry - is FAKING??!
I am a woman who can’t stand when women fake abuses . This is why I listened.
But I am not trying to become victim to pseudoscience.
If US FBI agents can admit that human ability to detect lying is largely fallible - why would this speaker be ANY different , especially when I was willing to support (open mind) but found myself alarmed , having experienced veraciously physical traits , she describes as “untruthful”.
Sometimes - tears have run down from both eyes at same time.
What about if you’ve lost a loved one??!
This makes you a liarrr???
This is terribly and laughably not so. It knocks down women, instead of empowering them, while also “proving” their truths might be lies.
Use real science and studies please.
FYI - I’m a woman who’s been bullied by other women. They’re not innocent. But unverified science empowers WOMEN AND MALE ABUSERS... not female victims.
true..wtf she spoke..ansu aye nhi aye wtf
Everyone is different who are you to judge human function Jackson can’t even move his face wow you must be god ? Are you the creator?
How about we gather evidence and we present them in court? The way we do with all crimes with a high degree of gravity? Just saying this because I have anxiety and if someone brings me to court for any reason my soul is gonna watch the whole deal from the ethereal plane.
I'm sorry to say but most of the conjectures about "body language"are highly inaccurate and overly generalized.
Fantastic
So many cases where people who showed anger at being accused and threatened legal action, turned out to be culprits. This woman is full of crazy theories!
wow wow wow
awesome video
Please stop blowing into the mic
Same think my friend is facing he is fighting the case
Men need women support to show male issue ..
Women rapists are need to punished equally.
this women is crazy
This Talk was very good. A good presentation. I just have one point to make. You can't go entirely by body language. I am sure this is known. I don't know the result of Michael Jackson's case. In light of my point, people with plastic surgery have constrained facial movements. This was the case with someone who underwent a plastic surgery. He was injured on the face. He had a plastic surgery done. He said that very often his innocent smile was mistaken for sarcasm. He even told people that he had difficulty because of the injury and that the restricted facial movements were due to the plastic surgery. There is also the cultural aspect to body language such as passive-aggressive and a plethora of incidents which can lead to some unique gestures, peculiar to others. Please keep that in mind.
Nice video ❤️
Cheap methods not complete
Method that works for all
Be prepare fully before presenting
Feminists, like this.. I DARE YOU😂
This talk has lot of subjective suggestions.
Need updated research and discussion on how to detect lies on the internet in terms of text allegations.
How to detect a typed up lie.
That being said, some of this sounds like a bit of a reach.
Analysis of body language is useful but it shouldn't be sole evidence instead it could be a supporting evidence. Because the science behind body language is not absolute and 100% accurate.
Ya same
that fake girl wants to know your location😂😂
I m just watching this video to improve my poor speaking English
Sorry, if my comment is grammatical wrong
I mean no offense.
But now they have got the idea of everything.
And next time if they fake it...they will do it with perfection.
Hum aurat nahi to hum galat ....!
Wahh bc wahh
I get the point she's trying to make. But I don't agree with her generalisations on body language, people might have different reactions for the same incident, body language can differ from person to person. You can see anger in someone's face when they're angry, while some are very good at covering it.
"The way you will be behaving, is the exact same way the victim would be behaving". That's not true all the time, I am sorry.
Purpose of this video is noble but the content is very contentious.
She exactly predicted what Amber Heard did 😀
Horrible.
i disagree with most of it!
Fake tricks
WTF IS THIS TEDX TALKS??????
I don't agree with her on response of a person who is innocent... it is not that way... a person can have low voice you can be disgusted but wht can you do??? its ur words against a person in authority or boss for ladies will be heard .. men they wont be
This is irresponsible, TED should take this down. Genuine rape cases could be dismissed if this woman is taken seriously.
And some innocents may loose their freedom tooo.
why you want that boy should die
Fake cases are there too. Come out of your fancy world.
so what let them get dissmised
@@TilerHub then go to Islamic countries
In democracy it is always innocent until proven guilty
First comment
This is complete nonsense
that's called critical thinking and being rational ...I'm sure you're not blessed with any.