Professor Culbreath, thank you for this video, you actually helped me see the correlation to half-life and the use of the expression decay made it make more sense and thus easier to understand (based on my knowledge of half-life) damped oscillations more.
How to obtain the estimate of the damping and the natural frequency by means of a graphical survey of the step response? Having only the x-axis (time) and the y-axis (meters) available? Thanks
Hi Cristopher! i saw the video was breathtaking that make me realize many applications i could figure out for the damping factor, i would have a question, is that possible to find the mass of an object without knowing it and without having b? how would you actually consider b for saying.. a guitar? (should i consider the entire mass of the vibrating instrument?) many thanks!
Professor Culbreath, thank you for this video, you actually helped me see the correlation to half-life and the use of the expression decay made it make more sense and thus easier to understand (based on my knowledge of half-life) damped oscillations more.
Literally best video on dampened oscillator thanks!
Thanks for such an awesome video
Great explanation
clear explanation...thanks!
Awesome video, btw there is small a mistake, on 9:56 there shouldn't be two in e^(bt/2m)
How to obtain the estimate of the damping and the natural frequency by means of a graphical survey of the step response?
Having only the x-axis (time) and the y-axis (meters) available?
Thanks
What is the derivation for the formula for the time, t, when that pendulum has practically stopped?
Hi Cristopher! i saw the video was breathtaking that make me realize many applications i could figure out for the damping factor, i would have a question,
is that possible to find the mass of an object without knowing it and without having b?
how would you actually consider b for saying.. a guitar? (should i consider the entire mass of the vibrating instrument?)
many thanks!
great!! thank u
AMC to the moon