Music and Copyright - Copyright on YouTube
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 вер 2024
- We're here to answer your Copyright questions. In this video, we dive into frequently asked questions about music and Copyright on UA-cam. We talk about receiving copyright strikes for cover songs, what rights you need to use a song in a video, and other options for using music in your videos.
For more answers to your Copyright questions, check out the whole series here: bit.ly/31U1AHU
And check out our Help Center articles on Copyright: support.google...
Subscribe and hit the bell to see a new video each Tuesday: goo.gl/So4XIG
► Get step-by-step instructions: goo.gl/fBzr7
*Imagine going to court over using 10 seconds of someone’s music*
Wait wat?
Imagine going to court over using 10 seconds of your own music.
Everything that’s wrong with the world
Every hip hop artist that has ever sampled an old song.
@@pradyumnaalchemy7418 OOF
This is lowkey the hardest thing about making youtube videos
Ok
@@soapyguy6483 Ok
@@adam-ez1ij Ok
Absolutely
Yeah😭😭😭
No, UA-cam, your dispute process does not "empower" me when it's the claimant who is judge and jury. Anyone can claim to own content in my videos, I can say "no, and here's why" and they can say "too bad" and block my video, make $$$ off of my work, or take my channel down entirely. You need to do better.
i agree there are too many greedy companies
Nice
yes it`s true
Hmm Yes.
I once got I copyright claim of my own demo tape that me and my band released in the 90s... Never released on a record label, and we only sold it to like 50 local people on cassette! This was the first ever I uploaded it online! ;-) Their only purpose was to monetize it I guess. At least UA-cam belived me, but Its wierd to me that it is even possible to claim a demo. And then up to me, the owner, to prove that I own it to get it back. And not the other way around (But maybe the system has changed since then)
No matter how many times I watch videos and listen to explanations on copyright... I always leave more confused than when I started. I kinda feel like I should just go for it and deal with the fallout and I'll learn through experience, since no one's explanations seem to be very practical.
🤣🤣 couldnt have said it bettee myself
"Using even a small part of a song can result in a copyright strike" - So fair use doesn't exist anymore.
"Composition claims are eligible for revenue sharing" Yeah, they get 99% for 10 seconds or less of a 10-20 minute video I made.
"We built the dispute process to empower you to escalate problems to the claimant" Yeah, and then when I lose (which I will), I get a copyright strike.
UA-cam no longer cares about their creators. They only want to please the advertisers at this point.
True
Creators had their own web site having ads and sharing the revenue?
True
True
If someone got a strike all because they said a name of a song or whistled the Jurassic World theme tune I think that is ridiculous and just taking away people's rights, if this escalates enough they could say literally anything you say is copyrighted. I think Sony Entertainment are already abusing the copyright system. UA-cam needs to do a bit more of a better job. But as a UA-cam creator, you can never be too careful.
using the song from original creator is one thing but melody copyright too?! they talk like they expect every creator to know how to make a music. YT need to go F themself
@@delaslight
You ain't kidding.
O d y C is pretty decent from my experience
Where do you draw the line.. technically every word is a lyric.. so.. claim everything!
Also, people who claim people humming, or whistling a tune, need to go outside. That's just low..
Honestly though
When I heard humming a tune is copyright... c’mon... someone needs to really fight that and create some case law here
We all are using letters to write... who owns the copyright of those characters?
I agree
@@AlbertoMazarro lol😂
The life of a creator keeps getting harder and more treacherous. It's like walking on a mine field- the price of learning is a leg...
@Bhoomika's blog pri >>>÷/×8.
93 wqup,+ . Ptou/
@Bhoomikasblog ,😂😂😂😅😅😊😊❤😊😅,😅😊😅😊😊😊😊😊😊การ😊😊ศึกษาใน😊ประเทศและการ😅😊😅😊😊😅😊😅😊😅😅ใช้😅ชีวิตในการ😊😅😊ใช้😊😊😊ชีวิต😊😊ใน,😊😅😅😊😊😅😊😅😅😊😊😅😊😅😊😊😅😊😅😅😊😊😊😅😊😅😊😅😊😅😊😅ใน😅😊😅😅😅😊😅😊😅😅😊😅😅😅😊😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😊😅😊😅😅😅😅😅😊😅😊😅😅😊😅😊😊😅😊😅😅😊😊
V lyc
@Bhoomika's blog lo
🤣 a leg. Good one. I have so many legs to go through for my copyrights 😭.
I like how you say that it’s still stealing work even after giving credit in the description. It’s like not allowing someone to publish a book because it used words that were already in the dictionary.
Idk man, I'm having alot of fun taking people's videos down
@@youtubecopyrightsystem5530 Why are you like this. You are basically punishing people for trying to do the right thing. ie-give credit to the original people.
@@C_lamity ikrr
Bruh... they made songs its their property, if everyone in the world just "giving credits" to them and not buy their music how are they gonna get money???
@@gamerarts8455 We made the videos, its our property. If we use their property, we acknowledge it isnt
Do you know what would be funny
Giving the "UA-cam Creators" channel a false copyright strike.
Wait somebody please do that
**fake coughing sounds**
They deserve it
It would be nice if UA-cam could fix their copyright system so it doesn't flag my videos when all I'm doing is making music myself. Last week a video got claimed on behalf of Killer Tracks which is associated with Universal Music. They claimed the copyright to a part of my video where I was playing a single synthesizer note, yes you hear it right, not a musical composition but a single note. Not only was it a single note, it also was in a different key and in a completely different pattern and tempo, than the track I assumedly used according to the copyright claim. This happens a lot, I make a video explaining music production techniques in which all used sound/music is my own yet it still gets flagged for copyright.
Each time it costs me time to file a dispute and proof the content is mine and I own the rights, after which it takes another 30 days until I can finally see my revenue coming in, that is only if the claimant decides my dispute was correct, if they reject the dispute I'm in for another 30 days of waiting. In total it could mean I have to wait 90 days for my revenue even though it is 100% clear that I own the rights and there isn't even anything to base the claim on to begin with, yet I am the one who has to face the repercussions of it and not the claimant who filed the false claim.
So UA-cam, I'm going to ask this for the hundredth time now, you probably won't respond since you have never done so, but *_what happens to a claimant who files false claims?_* My channel can get terminated if I receive 3 strikes or if I file false disputes, but what happens when a claimant keeps filing false copyright claims? In my opinion, UA-cam should take a stance and protect its creators against this, which it is currently not doing.
Finally, something I have also spoken out about before, I want to talk about the "sharing your revenue" part of this video. I don't think *sharing* is the right word, to be honest since nothing of the revenue is shared. You lose ALL of your revenue the moment a copyright claim comes in on your video and you acknowledge that claim, even if the copyrighted material is only a small part of the content on which the claim was received. Sharing your revenue would mean that the revenue is SHARED between the parties involved since if you made the video, you still own rights to that video even if it uses copyrighted music. The moment you create a video you own the copyright on it.
So let's say you make a video with a voiceover AND you use copyrighted background music, then who owns the copyright? Well, in theory, there would now be multiple people who own the copyright. The video copyright would belong to the creator of the video, plus if he also did a voiceover he will also own the rights to parts of the audio. Since the background music was not made by the creator, that is owned by a third party and thus the third party owns a part of the audio copyright as well. So in this case only a third of the entire copyright belongs to the third party, yet because of their claim they get to keep 100% of the revenue. In this case, the best way to split revenue would be to give the third party its fair share of the revenue, instead of the full 100% like is being done now. It is not fair towards creators and its only playing into the hands of bigger record labels who keep filing claims because they know they will get 100% of the revenue. It has become a pretty good extra source of income for bigger labels at the cost of the income of creators. So can we agree that this is not "sharing revenue" but rather being forced to hand over all of your revenue from said video because otherwise, you face the consequences?
I hope someone answers you. Thats horrible.
i deserve a reward for reading this, and so do you
Thank you.
@@appeartechbd I hear you. It's obvious with recorded music, but w/ production music, this is the cancer I feared would spread over time, not if, but when. If they just made it easier for people to pay a reasonable fee or have ASCAP/BMI/SESAC/other PROs to support using music on alternative media like YT maybe people would be able to not feel so paranoid or feel they are in the wrong. YT is now owned by the big media, despite being owned technically by Google.
It's the modern day cable company, going against Hulu and Netflix. It's not the UA-cam I remembered growing up when it launched in 2005 it was like an international public access network on steroids, where the major media companies negotiated licensing deals. *Google is a lazy engineering company that refuses to learn how to negotiate with the big media outlets. They always cave into their demands!*
People are probably going to other outfits and then deal with copyright on their own. I'd rather do that, than fighting with a bot or someone who treats "users" like numbers. I feel worse for people who pay into UA-cam to get their content out, they should come first.
This is so sad and it happens to my videos too. Felt the same
I pay for Royalty FREE Music through Smart Sound and Triple Scoop Music. I PAY so that I can avoid getting unnecessary Copyright Claims. The same companies file claims against my videos over and over again and again. Is there any way I can get these companies to stop filing false claims against me? They even reject my responses which requires me to then to a very specific and detailed defense that ultimately results in the companies dropping their claim. Why do THEY not have to provide THEIR contact information so I can respond directly and work it out? It's a terrible system that is exploited by unenforceable copyright claims against creators like me, who pay for copyright licensing. Why are the companies that are repeat offenders not penalized?
Thanks for reaching out - if you plan to include copyright-protected material in your video, you’ll generally need to seek permission to do so first. UA-cam cannot grant you these rights and we are unable to assist you in finding and contacting the parties who may be able to grant them to you.
This is something you’ll have to research and handle on your own or with the assistance of a lawyer. More info here: yt.be/help/xF5F
Royalty free simply means it does not attract royalty fees for each time the track is played (each video view in this case).
I would first look to the licence you have paid for and check whether there are any limitations in the licence that might explain their claims. For example, they might limit the licence to not be used on UA-cam or not be used by creators with more than X subscribers.
If that isn't the case and there are no relevant limitations then you should contact them directly. It's weird that you discuss in your comment the lack of contact information in their claim but one assumes that you have contact information for someone you a paying to use their creative works. Right?
@@UA-camViewers Your canned response did not cover his situation nor his question.
Hi, Frederick :) I create music vids and use Epidemic Sound (monthly creator account). Every so often a claim is made from a track I've used (not claimed by Epidemic, but by a label), it hardly ever happens, but if it does, it's done by the music label of that song. I just dispute the claim immediately and discuss my creator account that I have with Epidemic *you link your youtube account with your Epidemic account through the Epidemic website in your profile settings *this helps to avoid these issues). Anyhoo, any claims (which have been few, are eventually dropped. I can't recommend Epidemic Sound enough! They have a VAST library of music for anything under the sun and not only that, they are actually a record label as well. I think I pay like, $15 per month for my youtube creator account :) Hope this helps you :)
@@tjmarx OH! That's a great point! About some licensing having certain view limitations.
UA-cam gives me copyright strikes against my own original music. They wont let me make money off my own music.
then dont use youtube its a cancerous corporate business flawed in many ways
UA-cam: Copyright Policy
Also UA-cam: Now introducing UA-cam Music and UA-cam TV!
When I tested my video for copyright and posted it as private , there was no copyright claim detected. When I made the post public, it suddenly showed copyright claims. Same system, what should we do now?
ขอบคุณสำหรับคลังเพลงเเละเสียงฟรี-youtube ถ้าไม่สิ่งนี้มันคงทำให้วีดีโอของฉันจืด-ขาดเกลือไม่มีชีวิต เหมือนต้นไม้ขาดนํ้า เฉกเช่น..บุรุษขาดสตรี
ขอบสำหรับเเนวความคิดที่ดีเยี่ยมผู้ก่อตั้งเพลงใช้ได้ฟรี บน youtube โดยไม่มีค่าสิ่งตอบเเทน จะด้วยวิธีใดก็ตามขอบคุณครับ ขอเป็นกำกลังใจให้.
Thank you for your free music and audio library. -UA-cam If not this thing would make my video fresh - lack of salt without life Like a tree without water Just like .. men lack women Thank you for the great idea. The music founders can use it for free on youtube without any feedback. Either way, thank you. Please be my desire.
The copyright rules on UA-cam are simply unfair. For those of us that review or react to songs and music videos we don't stand a chance. We work hard to provide informative and honest reviews and reactions and provide extremely entertaining content for the viewers and yet we do not reap the benefits because of these strict rules. Music publishers should look at videos like this as free promotion. It is not like we are just uploading their music for all to hear rather than buying the song. In these scenarios the publishers are not losing anything and only stand to gain. I wish UA-cam would reconsider the rules surrounding use of music in reviews and reaction videos because we as content creators in this niche are a huge part of UA-cam's success and we bring in a lot of traffic. We work extremely hard on the videos that we produce and it would be great if we could reap the rewards and actually make a substantial living out of this without having to branch out through other revenue streams. Thank you
If you know no automated system is going to be perfect, then you need to acknowledge human beings are not perfect either so to strike them immediately without any sort of warning system is just vile and malicious.
Artist: "It's literally my song in my own video and some company copyrighted it"
UA-cam: "I missed the part where that's my problem".
Someone is extracting the audio from my UA-cam videos, and rebranding them as their own.
UA-cam wont take any action because the videos are auto generated by themselves.
I am now getting copyright claims against my own music. The whole system stinks!!!
I create my own music using Logic Pro on the Mac. The amount of times I’ve had content claim thrown at me concerns me as I put a lot of time and effort into creating my original music only to be told someone else owns the rights to it and if I don’t take it down I’ll receive strikes against my name etc. I tried standing my ground once only to be threatened by action from the person claiming it was theirs. I backed off for fear of someone adding a strike to my account but still annoyed to this day as it was my own music creation and sounded nothing like the song I was being accused of using. Every time I upload a video with my music it’s a worry I don’t need.
If you're using copyright free samples that others are using from Logic then tell UA-cam and the claimant that.
If the claimant still argues then tell Logic about the claimant.
Copyright system records the video being uploaded as original so if you have similar samples you will get a copyright notice.
This is a problem that often occurs in the field, someone buys music from the same provider company, and gets loyalty, but copyright approaches him.
UA-cam has the us army after them
@@Pika-Chu64 amazing
It sounds like UA-cam needs to stop enforcing Composition Rights on us.
I mean, the only reason UA-cam can even exist is because of people like US, not the record companies.
you get more views than Baby Shark? I'm shocked I've never heard of you.
Content Creators Union! There are more of us than there are music publishers!
After reading all of these horror stories, it sounds like there needs to be a class action lawsuit filed against You Tube on behalf of users who have no doubt been victimized by false claimants doing harm to creators without facing consequences which a court could view as collusion between false claimants and You Tube. Any government attorneys interested?
1:48 "We built the dispute process to empower you to escalate problems to THE CLAIMANT."
Does anyone catch the glaring flaw? UA-cam doesn't review claims; they just bounce it back to the ofttimes phony claimant for their ruling. Imagine a customer service system that forwards my complaint to the very person about whom I'm complaining.
I legitimately purchased the composition rights to do a cover of a song. Some whacked out 3rd party targeted my channel and claimed copyright revshare even though they are not the copyright holder. I submitted a claim dispute to youtube, explaining all of this and providing documentation of the true copyright. Claim denied, no explanation other than saying the phony copyright claimant rejected my appeal. I'm not going to share 1 penny with these frauds, so I just deleted my entire video and everyone loses: the fraudsters, me, my fans and even youtube. How is this acceptable?
"Oops, we made a mistake, but too bad. We're still going to profit from you" is the mentality I get from false claims yet GoogleTube sits on their hands and does nothing.
what's stopping my 14 year old son from not filing a claim on a Pewdiepie video and claiming the income on a million-hits video and claiming rights on it that can't be verified?
Nylon String Guitar Music the difference is that PewDiePie has 100M people behind his and and plus, UA-cam would get a lot of backlash if they did something to him. If you are a small creator, the report can take weeks to go through the system and you can’t do anything about it because UA-cam won’t listen to you
@@natelabao3842 I had to wait a month
We uploaded a Guitar cover of song "A" or say title "A" on youtube in June 2016...
We got copyright claim from few claimants on sharing basis for song "B" or say title "B" for first approx. 30 seconds part from total 5.55 mins video....
Later youtube said that if we "Trim" the claimed part of video, our said video could be copyright free...so these claimants very next day changed their claim from 30 seconds part to WHOLE video i.e. changed their claim from 30 seconds to 5.55 mins...and when asked youtube has no answer for this...
now further another twist..
in this year i.e. in 2019 after 3 years these FAKE Claimants changed their claim title itself...in other words they were claiming on title "B" earlier but now they have started claiming on title "A" i.e. the song cover which we have uploaded...so my question is that how could they claim on the cover which we never covered ? i.e. they claimed on "B" but ours was "A"...and now how can they change / shift their claim later or after few years from "B" title to "A" title ? they did it because they realized in one of our comments (like we r commenting here now on creators' channel) that the claim they are claiming is not on our uploaded titled cover but for another one, so they changed their claim from "B" to "A"...and the worst part is that these fake claimants are increasing day by day....every 3 months i find new claimant for the said cover...how is this allowed i wonder ? several attempts to write to youtube has yielded no results yet....we always get the standard replies and ready made copy paste rules & regulations from support people..so i request your good self to actually look into these problems, work in this direction & implement sound & positive steps to enhance faith in people....i am sure scenario will change...there r tons n tons of fake claimants from all over....the videos u r uploading r of no or little help...we all know all these norms...sorry if hurt..thanks for reading long comment
Regards
FAther of YAsh
And its getting to the point where small YT users cannot be considered part of the site anymore.
The copyright system is broken. Content ID literally puts more money into WMG, UMG, LatinAuthor, Sony, and of course Google's hands.
Does youtube give strikes to people under 1,000 subs?
@@childrenofgodstudios Yup, I got one once with only a few subs.
@@e5m956 how long ago was this?
@@childrenofgodstudios End of April this year and it was a video that I posted of the Supercross race (home video) at MetLife stadium and the notice was from Feld Entertainment. I think that it was an automated take down based on the title where it was looking for people posting the TV broadcast because I have another home video clip from the same event that never received any grief and is still up on my channel. These automated things are so imperfect.
@@childrenofgodstudios I literally just tried to upload a stupid remix in which I used Frist of the year of Skrillex for 1 minute editing the sound and the video and mixing it with other songs. I just wanted to experiment something I never did, have fun and see what people think about it and maybe show it to some friends, so I uploaded it on a channel with 4, yes 4, subscribers that clearly doesn't allow me to monetize it (as I neither want to for sure) and the video got instantly claimed for this minute and got shut down and inaccessible in the whole fucking world. Just cause I wanted to see what I could do.
What I do not understand is what they think they earn from shutting it down, nothing changes if it's on or not
There’s some companies like UMG that abuse the copyright system , UA-cam should address this. They don’t own Mozart or Beethoven, but constantly copyright claim videos as if they did…
I am just curious how some of the creators get away with such ID claims such as melody copyright claim???
I really hope can have a place to "test" have copyrights or not, because if I don't know, then I uploaded, may got problem.
So it's possible to test first? Please.
Yes, make a secondary youtube channel and upload all your videos with the music you want to use. If there is any problem, your secondary channel will take the hit, not your main.
There is a list of music you can check against. It's an official UA-cam check list, and it's broken. They don't have a lot of tracks, and even the ones they do list, they give you a false hope.
I have checked and passed so many tracks only to be hit with a claim.
UA-cams systems are seriously broken.
They no longer care about the creator
just upload it in private mode and save... wait and check your mail if you get a copyright claim/strike you will get an email or u won't get an email if it is safe then you can make it public.
@@AlexMaravilla good idea but its troubling if your secondary gets taken down for major copyright strike violation. Then you'd have to make another and another and another
Notice that they did not use any music in this video... They know that the system is broken.
It would have either drowned out her voice or they didn't find a song that matches the tone of the video. Don't attack me, attack hanzo.
nice
they used music?
If someone has a copyright claim they should be provided with a way to get a license. There should be a law
Its alright getting a claim for copyright but can they prove they are the copyright owner?
This is the problem of any industry when one party becomes too powerful for the other to challenge. It is the role of government to intervene to protect the interests of the people
Me: gets royalty free music or commissions someone to make music for ME.
UA-cam: Not so fast.
i have some music my channel
can i use third party music without any risk like - NoCopyrightSounds - NCS with give his credit in my description ?
is it safe ?
If you're using someone else's content, you'll want to learn more about copyright. There's tons of info to get you started here: yt.be/help/VrKj.
@@UA-camViewers hi I've had some problems about the "copyright" how is humming a possible strike?, everyone hums, every word is a lyric.
I want to know also if it safe? If i use it with them attribution in description?!
ua-cam.com/video/0JcsZq8rDxs/v-deo.html
@@UA-camViewers shut up kiddo
there needs to be a dispute process for live streams. I've had YT stop live streams because of false copyright claims.
⁹9
This is definitely a perfect video
By the fact that there's zero dislikes
I disliked it
Perfeita a explicação. Ficou muito esclarecido. OBRIGADO !
Xd 0 likes
This so so useless
I would be interested in a video about privacy complaints.
I play guitar in some of my video. Usually a small riff or melody. They are originals or off the top of my head. I have never got a copyright strike but was wondering if my videos are ever monetized will this be a problem
thats where the problems might start Its like the devil in disguise Watch this link
ua-cam.com/video/Tov-dB8XYzQ/v-deo.html
Dear UA-cam Team, No video has been getting better views in one day than in the last 3/ 4 months.Video quality has been declining since 12 hours, despite the fact that video quality is good.The channel is losing viewers drastically.What to do . N.B The first 12 hours are a good view.After that the view is completely reduced.
Hmm, this is actually a normal part of how UA-cam validates views. Temporarily slowing down or even freezing a video's view count is expected, here are more details about why this happens and how it works: yt.be/help/Jgao
Also, UA-cam may adjust the video quality to help improve viewing conditions - for example when there’s a slower internet condition. You can still change it yourself from the menu (settings) then select quality: yt.be/help/JXPZ
If you're still having trouble with your views and video quality, Creator Support can dive into this further with you, learn how to get in touch with them here: yt.be/help/partners
Hi there! Not sure if anyone can help 😩 Trying to find some answers 🥺 For example, if I have a 10-20 minute video but in that video there is a 5-10 second clip with copyrighted music playing in the background from a radio or phone - will that be flagged or a copyright strike? Is there a time frame I could get away with or is it just not worth the risk at all?
Thanks for your help!!
Ellie 💖
Thank you for guiding the issue of music copyright infringement on UA-cam. Creators should avoid music copyright infringement.
Lets copy this video for more copyLEFT
UA-cam restricting videos is a Joke
The old version of the dashboard told you want song they were claiming. Recently I had a song claimed that was not the song they were claiming. Cool, but in the new front end I could not tell what song it was, I had to go to the old dashboard to figure out what song they were claiming. It was not the song I had licenced, so I have been confused as to what to do as there is no clear option in the dispute system.
Thanks for letting us know. You can remove the claimed content from your video with editing tools, or if you think the claimed content is incorrect, you have the right to dispute it: yt.be/help/LKJN. If you're having trouble looking for the details of the claim, it should be available under the Copyright Notices tab.
Also, use the Send Feedback tool when you're using Studio beta to let us know what you’d like to see or tell us in the survey that pops up when you switch back.
Wouldn't it be easier if there was a copyright sound check for example you want to use Fall Out Boy - Centuries in the background of your youtube video, you would then send this song you wanna use to copyright sound check then it would tell you if you can use this song or not in your youtube videos. I think this would be a great idea 💡
It would be easier for creators so they dont have to worry about copyright or getting banned from UA-cam for no reason.
is getting a copyright claim safe because of green sign?
i used to think copyright strikes were the worst thing that can happen to a creator but after watching furious pete video on being sued for $100,000 by record labels a strike is like a gift compared to what he is going through UA-cam normally gives you the heads up on posting copyrighted songs on your video so they dont get sued and you dont get sued but i guess if you have 5 million subs and high profile the greater the chances of record labels coming after you directly . Very scary
I've been sticking to youtube audio library and found some channels with no copyrighted music as long as I credit the owners and include a creative commons license and I've had no issues with music and copyright so far!
Taisen's Cool Stuff send me the name of the songs pls
I recently got content id'ed from using music from one of those no copyright channels. the claim came a year after the video was uploaded. the channel where I got the music from disappeared from yt.
If you're under 1,000 can you still get flagged copyright ?
UA-cam should buy or negotiate all licensing to music so Creators can go wild producing awesome content which in return will only be beneficial for all parties. #prettyplease
That would be the best thing youtube could do for creators!!
This would be awesome!
Music publishers are NOT acting on the behalf of the artist who wrote and created the song the music. If anything, they are the ones that robbed the artists blind. You don't need to lie to any of us UA-cam about who's benefiting from copywriting 🙄
What alternative methods or tools can be used to check for copyrighted music inside a video for UA-cam?
I need to know if the music played in the video is protected by copyright on UA-cam.
I know that we can use default feature on UA-cam for checking copyrighted music, however it's uncomfortable for me, because I have many small videos in one video.
That's why I'm looking for a new way how to check music in videos before creating one video and upload one on UA-cam.
Would it do harm if I used the Content ID system to my advantage to help me find the name of a song I hear or find online? I used this "trick" once to find a song that someone used for the intro on a Flash animation on Newgrounds. Here's what I'm talking about:
1. I use a recording device such as screen recorder to record the song
2. Upload it to UA-cam and private the video
3. Once the video gets claimed for the song I look at the details to see what song it claimed
4. After finding the song somewhere else I delete the video I recorded of the song
Somewhere in the youtube website, i found that this is a way to clarify if the song is copyright-free or not. You litterally just used it to find music titles. Cool Idea.
I have been on monetization review for 6 months and there are no copyright violations or other violations.
I really hope that monetization will be approved as soon as possible
Thank you
If you haven't heard back yet, this usually means your channel is being held for additional reviews (bc your content is close to not meeting policies). We’ll put more effort/resources into the final decision, thanks for your continued patience: yt.be/help/YPP-review
@@UA-camViewers
1 year is not enough for a channel review sir?
@@UA-camViewers
this is my channel URL:
ua-cam.com/users/MaytunsTv
Is my channel being reviewed by the UA-cam team or in the queue?
Is something wrong with my video?
My channel is under review for one year
I really hope the youtube team will make a monetization decision
So that I can expand my channel and improve
Our team still doesn’t have any additional info or timelines to share. When there's an update, you'll get an email with any news + your Monetization tab in Studio will have updated info. Thanks for understanding.
@@UA-camViewers
thank the team for the answer
hopefully as soon as I can get the news
What about fair use? I would love a video on that. I had a Copyright Claim on my most recent video by SME, the song in question was clearly being played in the background by the restaurant that I was sat in over their speakers. I didn't add the track myself and it was entirely accidental, I didn't even acknowledge that the music was playing. Does this not come under fair use? I disputed it and SME came back saying it was still valid. Can anyone help or speak of experience with this kinda thing? Thanks :)
While we can't give the specifics about fair use, you can watch our video to learn more how fair use works. Here's how: ua-cam.com/video/1PvjRIkwIl8/v-deo.html
Any public place has to have a license to sell liquor and play music.
So they have already paid for the right to play music.
So you recording and catching music should not be a problem and you should tell SME that too.
I cannot believe Sony are doing this. Sony is a Japanese company.
@@alpzepta The television is called promotion and UA-cam is called Entertainment.
Sony is like all the rest.
I just want to say that I *Love* UA-cam. You guys are light years above the rest of these content apps that can't figure themselves out. THANK YOU for the work that you guys do. Sincerely. 👍🏾
Be honest; the only way to avoid a copyright strike is to make sure there is no music of any sort in your video at all.
Good Q&A session. I watched it to the end. And just like in the other videos, you failed to address my question. Example: I am visiting Las Vegas. At night I go to the Bellagio Hotel water show and take video of the fountains. The Bellagio plays background music as part of the show. I posted my video on youtube and got a copyright hit. Why? I must assume that the Bellagio paid the music creator to use their songs. So the music is paid for. I am unable to separate the music from the sound of the fountains and the crowd. So my only alternatives are to remove the video or replace it with some youtube free music that does not match the motion of the fountains. Or, no sound at all. The Bellagio paid to play the music so that we could hear it as we record the water show. Like some people have stated below, if this type of copyright hit is continued, then one can never record the street signs on the Las Vegas Strip since they belong to the Hotels. Also, one can not record people walking down the strip without getting a release from everyone you pass. In my case, the action of the Bellagio Hotel does place the associated music in the public domain.
Please try to address this next time.
Why is this video unlisted? These stuff should be on the front page!
We need a better platform other than YT, it's getting ridiculous now
UA-cam ua-cam.com/video/Jl1SGaEjs-U/v-deo.html
EMI literally is trying to claim that MY personal recording of ME singing Claudio Monteverdi is a "cover" of their recording of another soprano singing the same piece. NO ONE owns copyright for the compositions of a composer that died in the 17th century, therefore, it cannot be "Covered". Corporations like BMI and EMI are abusing this system. Like, I literally sang some music written in the 17th century and that's been recorded THOUSANDS of times and EMI is like; "Oooh, your performance sounds like our recording. Can we have some of your money?" RIDICULOUS and UNSCRUPULOUS.
UA-cam is so hard with us, he can't just shut down a person's channel in an blink of an eye! My channel took me so long time and work to grow up. It just so unfair to shut down so fast without any warning. UA-cam should warn users that if they use that content again then will they get copyright strike, not just give us the strike like a punch in the face without any warning! We are not hackers, we are not theifes, we are just normal people enjoying uploading our favourite videos! Don't be so bad with us
Excepcional. Até assistir novamente !
So I have a question my friend who is a music artist was playing her music in a video but she still got copyrighted for it so how do we get this to stop happening
Same thing happened to me… I recorded my own music and they said I used other people’s music
Thanks for the short informative video. As a #music #improvisation channel, we monitor this closely when we improv over well known tunes and acknowledge all copyright owners in in these videos and descriptions. However the vast majority of our videos are all unique and original content that we then place a copyright notice on.
раньше в своих видео ставила фоновую музыку, подходящую к текущему видео. Несколько раз через несколько дней после того, как поставила видео, получала уведомление о том, что нарушила чьи то авторские права. Это было неожиданно для меня. Ведь когда грузила видео, ничего такого не было. Потом узнала о том, что в некоторых случаях уведомление о нарушении авторских прав может поступить через пару дней. Дальше не стала рисковать. Удачи всем нам, мира и добра!
its most general sense, a fair use is any copying of copyrighted material done for a limited and “transformative” purpose, such as to comment upon, criticize, or parody a copyrighted work. Such uses can be done without permission from the copyright owner
i do love it when music i paid for gets claimed
still confused...
i always upload my song.. my creation..
if i accept CR.. how?.. i just enjoy with my hobby..
Thank you for this. Can you make a video about What not to do when you're monetize, so that you don't lose your channel
It's not fair what you say. You surely don't allow artists to grow. Tnx for that!
Thanks
It sad that reactions channels are dying because of UA-cam copyrighting everything.
Well i don't think someone would really be happy if people just sit and look at a video they spent alot of time on and just give off their reaction to gain money
always supports watching until they run out and good night
فديو مهم ومفيد جدا جدا أصبح يوجد تطور في القناة ويتم نشر معلومات مفيدة عن السابق .
لك كا احترااااامي والتقديى يااااا سيدتى
مرحبااااما تسمحين لى يا انت يا سيدتي
بالله عليك هياااااا ساعديني وسااااعديني
What if I will remove the music did I will get paid 😊
Sony Publishing caused a strike on my UA-cam channel because I recorded Joe Walsh doing one song during an Eagles concert. I love to record songs from live bands to share to others to bring joy to them, not to monetize in any way. Joe Walsh never said no recording of music during the concert. So I will dispute this and see what happens. It’s messed up
UMG, T-Series be like - " doesn't matter what you do,you'll get Copyright Strike or Claim from us "
You should have covered the cases where a music publisher will allow the use of their music in exchange for the right to monetize the creator's video. I always get people asking how I avoid strikes when the vast majority of my videos contain copyrighted music.
Teach me more please 😭
This makes me not want to share music on UA-cam even if it is just for fun
I've seen people put the song information in their description. I was going to do this, but there was no place to do that in the editor and I got an ID strike before the video even finished uploading. I need to know how to do this as it seems other creators can, and even monetize those videos. Mine wasn't even the whole song. Just a 10sec "ahhhh" part. I have no problem at all giving credit, but the uploader wouldn't even let me upload the video, much less configure settings to give credit. I mean let's be honest. What's the point of a network if networking isn't allowed.
Its really hard to find a song for my background sound I have hard on find one so thankyou for the tips!
I have a question: how do you know if you have been copyrighted
I believe you should check your E-Mail? (?)
A few days ago, I was surprised to find one of my top viewed Shorts blocked by WMG for "copyright grounds". No notification no "restrictions" listed in my channel on the video so I cannot even dispute or drop said sound track. The video is about 12 seconds long (original shoot and sounds). A music track from YT's very own audio library was used in the background, hardly audible as the original sounds dominate. The video is still in my own channel content, playable for me but not discoverable or playable to the public or subscribers. Can't seem to reach any YT support despite sending "Feedback". And here I am ^_^. Any insights from the wise sages would be greatly appreciated to help assuage the insanity ! Happy New Year !!
I had a Music of Memes video it was blocked worldwide 7 months ago, and it was so popular it almost reached 18M views, that video was the heart of my channel (The Cool Cat) when it was blocked worldwide my subscriber count was going down and my views were going down, I disputed all claims but none of them worked, then I was reuploading the video but it was blocked in Turkey then I deleted the reupload, then I had a hard time. then gave up.
Thanks UA-cam for stressing me out. And UA-cam stop lying it does not "E N P O W E R" me 1:48
This is extreme copyright which I don't agree with at all, it's too strict, limiting the visibility of the artist. Look at how academic writings which are now has two versions, either the consumer has to pay or no need pay to read it; which is all dependent on the choices of either the authors or publishers.
Hi, giant music nerd here to talk about the first question. I can play a melody im a different key, technically Im playing something different. Music copyrights only claim the melody in that key, and music copyrights in general aren’t that powerful. You’re just giving them way more power than they legally have.
I used someone's video without permission, I inserted my own music into that video. And finally the original owner of the video asked UA-cam to delete the video, and I got 1 Copyright Strike. UA-cam says the "Copyright Strike" expires after three months, but after three months now I still have 1 Copyright Strike?
Thanks for reaching out - besides waiting for the copyright strike to expire after 90 days, you also have to complete Copyright School. More info here: yt.be/help/fhTF. If you've already completed the Copyright School and you still have an active strike, let us know.
@@UA-camViewers Thanks so much for your replies, yes..my copyright strike is 0 strike now. Regards.
En 2019 , toujours pas une version française ..
Sinon,active les sous-titres.
Here is a solution- Send the suspected videos to the copyright owners to review it. They will employ employees to review those. It will also make a new job sector for unemployed people. Then copyright strikes will no longer be UA-cam's responsibility. You cannot rely on AI. It will surely make mistakes and make innocents suffer.
It’s easier to understand quantum physics! Than music copyrights
Somebody needs to make a big song so if UA-cam rewind uses it, then they would get copyright claimed
Yes
Good information and very helpful...
I'm just here because I need subs or views HELP and thank you
I'm using your library...👍
The problem is there are people sampling things or downloading beats and then claiming UA-cam ID
*Use music from the UA-cam audio library because it is 100% free and you can still place adverts on your videos. Don't trust people who say that you can use certain music as it is copyright free because it is you taking the risk when you use it in your videos.*
Copyright law is stupid asf. It should only be used for taking large chunks of a song and uploading it in its raw form. Nobody should get copyrighted for remixing 5 secs of an unreleased track
My question is this. I purchased 'UA-cam Movie Maker' that includes lyric videos. My impression was that uploading a lyric video to a song using this program would cover music licensing. But I put 2 videos up and, on the info, make it said there was a claim but the owner gives permission to use the music. After it was published, I received a copyright strike. So that does mean I wasted my money buying the UA-cam Movie Maker if I am still not allowed to upload video lyrics? I see so many people load up video lyrics and wonder how they do it.
I desire to go through osteomyelitis hurmiya manage ment
I came here to learn how to license a cover, and stay out of the 'strike zone'
I learned nothing.
Same
That's youtube for ya