Azlask, the Swelling Scourge: Commander's Guild Deck Tech/Gameplay

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9

  • @ChronoCommander
    @ChronoCommander Місяць тому +1

    As someone who has actually built my own version of this deck, and actually has a copy of every “experience counter” card ever printed, it’s not that reliable. Expecting to pull another experience benefit card is too unlikely in a standard game and if you do it makes you too big of a target before you can build up enough counters to mount a strong enough defense to not get knocked out.

    • @DungeonLearnersGuide
      @DungeonLearnersGuide  Місяць тому

      Interesting. I can see that making you a target in a game. That’s mainly why I figured the deck would lean heavily on Eldrazi tokens too, it shores up the weakness of not drawing other experience counter creatures.

  • @Vintage_Zen
    @Vintage_Zen Місяць тому

    Archelos will return! Commenting late because life...is not...a race

  • @JeffBoes-m4s
    @JeffBoes-m4s Місяць тому

    Interesting fact: there's only one card with the creature type "Spawn" and none that have the type "Scion". Legend's "Elder Spawn", which is pretty bad in a mono-blue deck, and would be even worse in this five-color deck.

    • @DungeonLearnersGuide
      @DungeonLearnersGuide  Місяць тому

      Yeah, they’re some of the creature types that are almost entirely exclusive to tokens (like Saproling and Servo).

    • @JeffBoes-m4s
      @JeffBoes-m4s Місяць тому

      We got a legendary Saproling this year, so that's one less that's exclusive to tokens!

    • @ArtSolid-xu2fn
      @ArtSolid-xu2fn 19 днів тому

      Huh? We don’t need any of these. You play and generate tokens by casti g other eldrazi or other effects. I own a 30,000$ version of this deck. And its pwr 9.6 this comment is just plain misleading. Def does just fine.

    • @DungeonLearnersGuide
      @DungeonLearnersGuide  18 днів тому +1

      Other than bragging about your unnecessarily expensive deck, I’m not sure what your comment has to do with the original one?