math is so easy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,6 тис.

  • @ThousandDelights
    @ThousandDelights 11 років тому +14

    Way too many conditions need to be met in order for this to be practical.

  • @thkskitchen6718
    @thkskitchen6718 4 роки тому

    It is very good video
    Good exercise for brain
    It will help many students

  • @sbGamer
    @sbGamer 2 роки тому +3

    Found this video in my YT recommendations 14 years later

  • @ThePiMan0903
    @ThePiMan0903 2 роки тому +2

    Thanks for this! Really enjoyed this video sir!

  • @quabledistocficklepo3597
    @quabledistocficklepo3597 7 років тому +7

    Those two conditions make this trick worthless. You have to know ways that ALWAYS work; otherwise, you'll end up getting confused and making mistakes.

  • @ahanasarkar1155
    @ahanasarkar1155 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you sir it helped me allot

  • @frankman55
    @frankman55 13 років тому +64

    Sounds like my old kindergarten teacher. "What comes after 3, in counting? 4. isnt it."
    xD

  • @shallumaanjaan8747
    @shallumaanjaan8747 4 роки тому

    Very much Helpful vdo bro
    U should make this kind of vdo dear dst

  • @PankajSharma-fx5eg
    @PankajSharma-fx5eg 9 років тому +344

    this formula doesn't work for every number bro. it has a restriction that first no should be same and the last two no. should sum out to be 10. plz make things clear.

  • @agostinhojosealexandre5594
    @agostinhojosealexandre5594 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for explaining the conditions hahahhahahaha it was too good to be easy.

  • @peetraaify
    @peetraaify 13 років тому +5

    He is talking like Raj from Big Bang theory.
    I cant stop laughing :D

  • @Chris-family
    @Chris-family 2 роки тому +2

    Guys, don't do that for every number, it is only for specific numbers. Look, for example, 82 x 47, when you do his way, it is 1614, but if you do it in the standard algorithm or FOIL or any other way, it is 3854(I even used a calculator). I am not trying to be mean but that way is only for specific numbers and not for all numbers, I suggest you should do FOIL on most 2-digit numbers multiplied by 2- digit numbers. Again, I am just suggesting it and I'm trying to not be mean or anything. And also for the 3-digit numbers multiplied by the 3-digit numbers, you should also use extended- FOIL.

  • @zrecreikchan1372
    @zrecreikchan1372 7 років тому +17

    The title "Math is Easy" is a personal opinion

  • @muzyshayk8006
    @muzyshayk8006 8 років тому

    So helpful!!!!
    Let me explain in short
    In multiplication if THREE of these conditions is satisfied, one can use THIS method
    1. The number of digits should be same on both sides of the multiplication
    2.the last digits of both numbers to be multiplied should sum up to 10
    3. The numbers on the left of these two numbers which adds 10 must be same
    That's it

  • @maizenation9229
    @maizenation9229 10 років тому +18

    tried it with 12*14 and it doesn't work

  • @jonnyfive2370
    @jonnyfive2370 11 років тому +1

    The problem with all these various short cut methods.. by the time you go through them all in your head trying to remember if any apply when doing day to day maths. If you even remember which possible techniques can be used. You've wasted more time than if you worked them out normally to begin with.

  • @arnavrajurkar1177
    @arnavrajurkar1177 4 роки тому +3

    Your trick's good but way to many conditions!! It will be useful only once in a while!! Give us something more open and more usable!!
    Hope to see another good video

  • @tanuprananik3712
    @tanuprananik3712 5 років тому

    Khub sundar method, ata jante pere o khub valo holo

  • @lincolnthinking
    @lincolnthinking 5 років тому +5

    thank you for explaining the 2 conditions ~ now i understand the magic ~

  • @aakashvlogs2389
    @aakashvlogs2389 7 років тому

    it is very useful to me for exam
    I think maths become easy to me...

  • @silverspike1399
    @silverspike1399 5 років тому +7

    Your formula is incorrect if u find a situation where it does not work, so your formula is disabled

  • @116119N
    @116119N 7 років тому

    please listen carefully the 2 conditions

  • @avaross1773
    @avaross1773 11 років тому +26

    my gawd i was all for it, until he mentioned the two conditions... like, then it would take more than 3 secs cuz u have to make sure the problem satisfies the two conditions b4 u move on. and in that time i can just use my calc anyways.

    • @ramiroquerq
      @ramiroquerq 11 років тому +1

      So awsome ..

    • @tamilarasi5134
      @tamilarasi5134 5 років тому +1

      Yes u are correct. 43×21=903 is coming answer. But your method I was doing 203 is coming

  • @alamtipu1
    @alamtipu1 7 років тому

    36752 x 454243243424=?

  • @avnisharma4420
    @avnisharma4420 9 років тому +41

    You are fooling the people by telling that this method is easy when it is only applicable for a few examples. Vedic Maths is so dam easy and effective. And it works for all examples.

  • @doknosee7053
    @doknosee7053 7 років тому

    the guy says that this technique is applicable only to numbers with same second digits and that the sum of the first digits are ten..or I heard it wrong?

  • @sheikhshohan937
    @sheikhshohan937 8 років тому +6

    multiplication of 33 and 79 pls do it bro in this way and then prove ur method is correct

    • @sricharannaga474
      @sricharannaga474 4 роки тому

      This formula doesn't work then

    • @shubham9215
      @shubham9215 4 роки тому

      Sum of unit digit must be equal to 10

    • @divyathapar1
      @divyathapar1 4 роки тому +1

      There are 2 conditions which have to be satisfied

    • @ShikharInstitute
      @ShikharInstitute 4 роки тому

      He has already given two limitations...

  • @joe6211
    @joe6211 7 років тому

    This method doesn't work

  • @c.kariimcumar9659
    @c.kariimcumar9659 6 років тому +7

    Use simple way like that 3(4)=12 and 3(7)=21 answer is 1221. Multiple larger number when aske you answer 1 second

  • @will26help
    @will26help 7 років тому

    2 + 2 =4

  • @rohilvai5177
    @rohilvai5177 5 років тому +3

    Great multiple I like him

    • @anymaths
      @anymaths 5 років тому +1

      learn multiple and square numbers from my maths videos.

  • @shalu9089
    @shalu9089 7 років тому

    24 * 24

  • @learningproductionhouse8128
    @learningproductionhouse8128 6 років тому +6

    Wow, upload new video please

  • @tychophotiou6962
    @tychophotiou6962 7 років тому

    What language was he speaking??? Was it Gujarati?

  • @danielsetava332
    @danielsetava332 5 років тому +32

    But it is not for all numbers
    Eg: 43×21

    • @soumya6361
      @soumya6361 5 років тому +3

      He clearly said that it follows only when 2 rules are true. Hence there is other method for your example you asked.

    • @jazzvivar7547
      @jazzvivar7547 5 років тому +1

      Yah tss tss

    • @coolb9463
      @coolb9463 5 років тому

      the first 2 no. should be equal lmao

    • @nanigowra5473
      @nanigowra5473 4 роки тому

      You can watch my videos i did all concepts on it orally

    • @nanigowra5473
      @nanigowra5473 4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/TztGewlUOvY/v-deo.html

  • @lovekingtanwar1842
    @lovekingtanwar1842 7 років тому

    kya ya easy steps har digital part kamfu karega

  • @MoneyTalks099
    @MoneyTalks099 6 років тому +5

    Him:*math is so easy*
    Me:For you!😂
    It is true math is easy!

  • @vukkacsgota1819
    @vukkacsgota1819 7 років тому +1

    Math is easy huh tell this Carl Friedrich Gauss XD

  • @Harry-no
    @Harry-no 6 років тому +11

    Sir but by doing this it giving me incorrect even I use those conditions that you talk in this video
    67×65=4235 by doing ur method but answer is 4355

    • @lekhapatnaik8109
      @lekhapatnaik8109 5 років тому +5

      Ya....but the 2nd unit places of there sum is not equals to 10...as..according to ur sum 7+5 is 12 .....not 10...so that...this above condision was....incorrect for ur sum...once look at the above sum ....clearly...it mentioned

    • @Harry-no
      @Harry-no 5 років тому +1

      4355 is correct answer

    • @JP-wt4zr
      @JP-wt4zr 5 років тому +1

      @@lekhapatnaik8109 huh??????🤔🤨 i didn't understand anything u just said.
      Edit: nvm, now i do

  • @sandeepkumarwadhawan3336
    @sandeepkumarwadhawan3336 7 років тому

    47×44= 4×5=20 7×4=28 2028

  • @thinkcarefully84
    @thinkcarefully84 12 років тому +7

    lets say you chose 2 numbers, xy X zw
    to apply this process there are 2 conditions must be satisfied,
    1. x must be equal to z
    2. y+w must be equal to 10
    if you apply these 2 conditions you can use this process, otherwise it doesnt work

  • @surinderpalsingh5783
    @surinderpalsingh5783 7 років тому

    good trick.

  • @FunwitFaizaan
    @FunwitFaizaan 8 років тому +5

    This method doesn't work for 58*93=5394??

    • @abhayroy6232
      @abhayroy6232 8 років тому +2

      8 + 3 = 11 so the the methadone doesn't work, and 5 does not = 9

    • @bachanecib9166
      @bachanecib9166 7 років тому

      3011

  • @GJPolitics
    @GJPolitics 7 років тому

    Why are people hating he explained the rules at the end watch the full damn video

  • @santiyeman5463
    @santiyeman5463 5 років тому +3

    2:18, it explains the conditions

  • @dmragaming9589
    @dmragaming9589 7 років тому

    Thx for this

  • @ofelnavarro9688
    @ofelnavarro9688 5 років тому +4

    Yep math is soooo easy...
    1 + 1 = 3

  • @a.rramaysh7353
    @a.rramaysh7353 7 років тому

    this method
    is easy but not for allsums

  • @LifeZhudongTV
    @LifeZhudongTV 6 років тому +7

    數學 兩位數相乘 與 三位數相乘之計算(楊哥筆記)
    ua-cam.com/video/uS-pL6sx8Tw/v-deo.html

  • @dhanshyamaseel999
    @dhanshyamaseel999 7 років тому

    23×64 nahi ho raha hai a wale formule se

  • @mystical-nl8zt
    @mystical-nl8zt 11 років тому +3

    Awesome!

  • @shafatdar3183
    @shafatdar3183 7 років тому

    Bakwaas rule

  • @gundlapallilokesh1176
    @gundlapallilokesh1176 9 років тому +16

    this method is Rong...because
    Ex: 47*42=2014
    that's Rong 1974 is correct.

    • @GadderInd
      @GadderInd 8 років тому +7

      +Gundlapalli lokesh
      Like he said in order for this method to work there must be two
      conditions 1st) first numbers or integers should be the same 2nd) the
      last should be a sum=10, so for your example 24x25 ... The 1st condition
      is met but the second is not met since 4+5=9 and not=10 ... I hope that
      helps

    • @ManojKumar-jk5jn
      @ManojKumar-jk5jn 7 років тому

      just add 47+ 2 or 42+ 9 = 49 * 4 ie 4 is the 40+ thats y using 4....49*4= 196..last 2 digit multiply 7*2= 14...196¹4= 1974

    • @nasrkhan100
      @nasrkhan100 7 років тому

      see his video again in last condiotn applied

    • @DBeducation2811
      @DBeducation2811 7 років тому

      listen carefully

    • @vicvid0309
      @vicvid0309 7 років тому

      Gundlapalli lokesh see my videos if u get any help form that i will be glad .

  • @kamleshchandra4950
    @kamleshchandra4950 7 років тому

    22×23=506 this formula is not applied on this number..

  • @vikrampandey7589
    @vikrampandey7589 11 років тому +4

    do not abuse a great person like him....may god bless you

  • @MITHILESHKUMAR-bo3mu
    @MITHILESHKUMAR-bo3mu 7 років тому

    Sir 28×27bataye

  • @azizmustafa22
    @azizmustafa22 8 років тому +10

    I learned so much mashalla

    • @nanigowra5473
      @nanigowra5473 4 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/TztGewlUOvY/v-deo.html

  • @茅简
    @茅简 7 років тому +1

    这种方法的局限性很大,有趣但是意义不大

  • @amankapali7205
    @amankapali7205 9 років тому +6

    This formula doesn't work for every number. Can you solve 66*66

    • @iNicky777
      @iNicky777 9 років тому +6

      +Aman Kapali the first numbers have to be the same and the last have to sum up 10... yeah..it's flawed

    • @vicvid0309
      @vicvid0309 7 років тому

      Aman Kapali see my videos if u get any help form that i will be glad .

    • @spandiyarani7530
      @spandiyarani7530 6 років тому

      ua-cam.com/channels/nJ6NI1SVx84UHIEcDo2FKg.html
      See this channel maths shortcut all are very easy

  • @JyotiGupta-gi5ex
    @JyotiGupta-gi5ex 7 років тому

    can u multiply 29 with 29from this trick

  • @redflake3315
    @redflake3315 11 років тому +10

    37 x 33 in 3 second seems easy just pause the video take your calculator and count peace of cake

  • @godsingh7084
    @godsingh7084 7 років тому

    It's wrong

  • @omibond4935
    @omibond4935 12 років тому +16

    i was so impressed in the starting but when he said the conditions, in no time i pressed the dislike button!!!

    • @saudalee366
      @saudalee366 4 роки тому

      Haha, buddy same thing happens with me when he told abkut conditions. 🤣🤣🤣

  • @user-mg9cm4je5p
    @user-mg9cm4je5p 7 років тому

    Oh my good it's a reale magic 😱😱😱😱😱😱😱

  • @GadderInd
    @GadderInd 8 років тому +62

    42 x 46 = ??
    i) 5 x 4 = 20
    ii) 6 x 2 =12
    iii) 2012
    why the answer is 2012 but the truth answer is 1932 ??

    • @GadderInd
      @GadderInd 8 років тому

      +mehWishh mir Thanks :*

    • @balanagireddysomu6749
      @balanagireddysomu6749 8 років тому +6

      once again see the video....the units digits of two numbers must be equal to 10.Then only it applies.

    • @amitsankpal9715
      @amitsankpal9715 8 років тому +4

      Bcz they already mention tht 2 conditions must be satisfy,, 1)starting digit must be same, 2) unit digit addition must be 10.. that time only you apply this trick..
      Ty.

    • @youtooobbakchodarbhavas9816
      @youtooobbakchodarbhavas9816 8 років тому +1

      yo ryt conditions apply

    • @williamwheeler4344
      @williamwheeler4344 8 років тому +5

      Of course it works! 22x28 - 2x3 =6 and 2x8=16 Ans. 616.
      26x24 - 2*3 = 6 and 6x4-24 Ans. 624

  • @SonuSharma-tm7iq
    @SonuSharma-tm7iq 7 років тому

    ua-cam.com/video/oSzdDknUpWQ/v-deo.html

  • @priyankapalo7426
    @priyankapalo7426 8 років тому +4

    omggg sir its supeb😰

  • @rajarathnam7572
    @rajarathnam7572 7 років тому

    HARISH.R

  • @grasshopperchick374
    @grasshopperchick374 6 років тому +5

    IVE SPENT YEARS OF MY LIFE I CANT GET BACK ON THIS????!!!!!!

  • @tejaskumar5432
    @tejaskumar5432 7 років тому

    Ur formula not perfect for every number 28*27=656

  • @RasyadAlva
    @RasyadAlva 8 років тому +16

    WHO'S WATCHING THIS ON 2016!?

  • @marcelinebrownell8399
    @marcelinebrownell8399 7 років тому

    THE TITLE OF THIS VIDEO IS HUGE ASS LIE.

  • @JeppeHagh
    @JeppeHagh 11 років тому +4

    This is useless in practice?

  • @leongbk7107
    @leongbk7107 7 років тому

    This is a misleading approach for a simple logic. You can't ignore any digit in the multiplication. 56 x 54 != 56 x 14.

  • @ravivishnutech5365
    @ravivishnutech5365 8 років тому +3

    45*65= ? expailn that I use but answer wrong

    • @loulaloula2399
      @loulaloula2399 8 років тому +2

      the first digits must be the same. and the sum if the last digits must be 10 like 27×23

    • @triinkett3995
      @triinkett3995 8 років тому +2

      he did explain why you can't do that
      watch the whole video

    • @rebia5542
      @rebia5542 7 років тому

      RaviSri Balaji it's a different trick
      45×65
      4×6=24
      24+5 (add the repeater)
      29
      5×5 (multiply the repeater/last digit)
      25
      45×65=2925

  • @day2dayfinance_007
    @day2dayfinance_007 7 років тому

    Bro it is vedic math hence unislamic

  • @harpreetkhattra7819
    @harpreetkhattra7819 9 років тому +12

    1100 ? I think it was 3 seconds

  • @___mansii___2512
    @___mansii___2512 7 років тому

    432×371 please solve with same trick bro

  • @samg43able
    @samg43able 11 років тому +3

    This doesn't help, I'm pretty amazing at maths, and I'm getting the same answers as a calculator, and he's not

  • @markgaming1035
    @markgaming1035 7 років тому

    Only works when the same tens

  • @songsoowon
    @songsoowon 8 років тому +4

    23x29=627 ok ??????

  • @ハムスターガザミ
    @ハムスターガザミ 7 років тому +1

    Thank you so much

  • @omarhussin3498
    @omarhussin3498 8 років тому +4

    That is the wrong method..dont use it..

    • @mohammedemraan2022
      @mohammedemraan2022 8 років тому

      y

    • @andreatran7971
      @andreatran7971 8 років тому +1

      wait rlly?
      how is it wrong

    • @andreatran7971
      @andreatran7971 8 років тому +1

      wait rlly!!!!!!!!?????
      wat i wrong with it

    • @wedeldylan
      @wedeldylan 7 років тому

      +Andrea Tran it is completely useless, you'll rarely find two numbers to multiply that have the same first digits and remaining digits that add up to ten when you're in the real world

  • @aswini2793
    @aswini2793 7 років тому

    56 x 77 =??
    86 x 34 =??
    58 x 56 =??

  • @k0nn0r
    @k0nn0r 12 років тому +7

    Wow, you've found a way to quickly multiply 2 numbers that have the same first digits and where the second digits add up to ten. That is so useful.... NOT.

  • @piyushnagpal9937
    @piyushnagpal9937 7 років тому

    What is the ans of 25×75=????
    2×3 =6
    5×5=25 total ans is625

  • @anitahudda8348
    @anitahudda8348 5 років тому +3

    12×13=156 and by your trick answer is 206

    • @endofanage223
      @endofanage223 5 років тому

      Nope because the last to numbers added doesn't equal 10... So his trick doesn't apply... Watch the video again...

  • @minerfreakpvp6954
    @minerfreakpvp6954 7 років тому +2

    I need this man in my backpack.

  • @darianpham6381
    @darianpham6381 8 років тому +8

    I know how to make math easy!
    Use a calculator.

  • @isbagomango9099
    @isbagomango9099 7 років тому

    ha khiya methed kamal ho

  • @ibrahimdawood3114
    @ibrahimdawood3114 8 років тому +4

    Extremely rubbish. I bet from100 percent there is a 0.001% chance of satisfaction of these 2 conditions..... Not impressed . Yeh india saara kachra hi bolta hay

  • @ramandeepsingh4652
    @ramandeepsingh4652 7 років тому

    1958×1231=?

  • @effysiale9857
    @effysiale9857 10 років тому +4

    Not to be offensive or anything but your accent is really annoying lol

  • @md.sojibftw2780
    @md.sojibftw2780 7 років тому

    how to know fast No! LoooooooL

  • @prankstergangster938
    @prankstergangster938 7 років тому

    lol because its basic

  • @dipeshbaradiya7445
    @dipeshbaradiya7445 7 років тому

    I'm not getting all numbers when I do multiplication.

  • @avtarkaint
    @avtarkaint 7 років тому

    how to add 39x42=

  • @dipakkishorekumarrana6942
    @dipakkishorekumarrana6942 7 років тому

    sir give me answer 32×33

  • @poojariamaravathi7612
    @poojariamaravathi7612 7 років тому +1

    24*27=628?????..if you belive you will lose(:

  • @uzmakhan1771
    @uzmakhan1771 7 років тому

    wow