Chameleon EFHW Antenna Review

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 12

  • @atakaldirak
    @atakaldirak День тому +1

    Nice! TA2GER 73!

  • @eduardopower5254
    @eduardopower5254 3 дні тому +1

    Great POTA! Congratulations de KK4NWW from St Petersburg FL.

    • @Take5W3GTR
      @Take5W3GTR  3 дні тому

      Thank you Sir. Have to get ya in the log.

  • @shanehean1
    @shanehean1 3 дні тому +1

    I am surprised the antenna tuned so well as a common mode choke should be at least 0.05 of a wavelength at the lowest band used away from the feed point on an EFHW..

    • @Take5W3GTR
      @Take5W3GTR  3 дні тому

      It works, been doing it this way for a while. It's a great antenna.

    • @shanehean1
      @shanehean1 3 дні тому +1

      @@ChilliZDC The essence of an EFHW is that it does not have a counterpoise as it uses the coax braid as the other half of the antenna. If you use a counterpoise then it sort of becomes an oddly fed (49,56 or 64:1 unun) off centre dipole?

    • @Take5W3GTR
      @Take5W3GTR  3 дні тому +1

      @@ChilliZDC Correct. Not using any counterpoise.

  • @thedevilinthecircuit1414
    @thedevilinthecircuit1414 3 дні тому +2

    Mind blowing that it's possible to talk hundreds of miles on little more than a big walkie talkie and some bailing wire tossed into a tree 😀 ⚡⚡⚡

    • @Take5W3GTR
      @Take5W3GTR  3 дні тому

      That the fun of it. Less is more for me.

  • @turtlecreek4633
    @turtlecreek4633 3 дні тому +1

    Nice activation, 73 w3rrm

  • @ouijim
    @ouijim 3 дні тому

    $175 !!! for a ferrite and wire! NUTS! Shamelon inferior overpriced common antenna. Get "quality" Balun Designs or Palomar Engineering for MUCH better performance and less money.