While bringing extinct animals back would be revolutionary, it may be dangerous introducing them to their old environment after other animals have taken over. So while we are saving one species, another may perish
k . but that's not a good idea. The world climate isn't the same as it was when these dudes lived. YOu cannot replicate those environments outside. Just don't do it.
Yes, it would be cool to see extinct animals walk the earth again, but we need to focus more on keeping animals that are still walking the earth that are BECOMING extinct from becoming extinct. We should not worrying about bringing back mammoths, we should start working on multiplying animals like pandas, and other animals to keep them from becoming extinct. Worry about animals that are still alive rather than the ones is already dead.
keeping existing species alive is good, but reviving long lost animals could have negative impacts on today's ecosystem, which has been functioning without them for a very long time.
0:47 Woolly Mammoth 6:19 Thylacine 11:09 Dodo 14:06 Moa 16:47 Siberian Unicorn 20:41 Passenger Pigeon 23:41 Sabertooth Tiger ----- 6:15 When the mammoth is sus 16:50 When the unicorn is sus 18:43 Did not adapt, growling stomach! 20:37 Here's looking at you, 'unicorn'! 22:45 YOWCH!
I personally think this might be extremely hard to do because the DNA from the bones skin, etc. might be too deteriorated to even use especially if it’s been over 1000 to 1,000,000,000 years it would be extremely hard to extract DNA from an animal that’s been alive thousands or even billions of years ago
@@Miira88 so they can study them better and it will be a big leap in the science field if they can revive instinct animals. Just imagine at how many kind of works they can apply those? It could make our medical prowess even greater and more. It just carry so many benefits
When you get up close to wildlife they can be really kind. As the old saying goes "don't judge a book by its cover" and plus I used to be absolutely terrified of SNAKES but one day I had one put around my neck I thought that I was gonna face a fear and it was really fun actually I think the only thing I was scared of was them biting me but because it was at school they were all tamed we only had them at school because we were learning about endangered and extinct animals
Actual 2050: the human species lifespan has increased to120 years, most predators are either extinct or domesticated, and the secret of the dna is finally unlocked and mars and the moon is 50% terraformed and habitable to life and earth is more civilized than ever.
Really? "Edited"? Did you have to watch jurassic Park again to make sure you got the quote right? P.s. when you quote someone with THIER words you're supposed to place it in " "s.
Just bringing a species to a different country will change things why would you bring back an old ass animal that strived in different circumstances there’s no good place to put it but we love to fuck up the world for our amusement 🤷🏽♂️
I hope they do bring back the Tasmanian tiger - Tasmania’s only predator. Since it’s been gone, small marsupials have run amuck and are constantly hit by cars.
@@lynnofmoonsclaws209 No, the Tasmanian devils are scavengers. They don’t hunt or kill living beings; they only eat dead creatures. The Tasmanian tiger was Tasmania’s only predator. The devils are actually quite adorable and can be tamed. Apparently they make great “watch devils” as they call them, as they make a very loud, menacing growl-cry that will curdle the blood!
@@deborahahonen6949 Sorry to tell you you are wrong. Tasmanian devils are hunters and can even take on a small kangaroo but in practice they are opportunistic and eat carrion more often than they hunt live prey. Although the Devils favor wombats because of the ease of predation and high fat content, it will eat all small native mammals such as wallabies, bettong and potoroos, domestic mammals (including sheep and rabbits), birds (including penguins), fish, fruit, vegetable matter, insects, tadpoles, frogs and reptiles.
@@kronomcs I have seen white rhinos in many sorts of sites and many research on them and people are trying to clone and breed them as much as they can. It’s pretty cool except the fact that they can’t always have them in the same facilities and places that they are kept in and when they do be released, they might still be hunted as were before.
As interesting as it would be to see extinct species brought back into the world I think we should first focus on ending poaching and over hunting once and for all and then save the species that are currently endangered. We also have to focus on saving the planet we are destroying. If we can do all of this first then we can consider bringing back extinct animals.
Some would say bringing back the saber tooth tiger wouldn’t be beneficial but I personally think the if we’re bringing the woolly mammoth back saber tooth’s could be used as a population control
The tiger wolves (yes I’m aware that’s not their real name) has actually been spotted I believe last year and they have a photo of what looks like a family (mother father and a cub) they can also open their months 90 degrees which is kinda cool but creepy
I was in Tasmania and learned a lot from museums and guides there. There are a bunch of people who claim they’ve spotted Tasmanian tigers in the wild, but scientists are very skeptical. I do hope there are some left, but it’s highly doubtful. Tasmania is now overrun with small marsupials that the ‘tigers’ kept in check. You almost can’t drive anywhere without hitting one or seeing them dead on the roads. Both the tigers and Tasmanian devils had/have jaws that open extremely wide and make very loud, intense growling/screaming noises. Amazing creatures!
@@ayarttt it died in the early 1900’s sadly do to poor life. They kept it in a concrete area outdoors in the heat and cold as well as it wasn’t fed or watered enough
@@davido3744 their immune systems would be so outdated they would die almost instantly. This is just another way for the government to steal your tax money.
@@DaRealKing303 what? they could easily survive todays bacteria there are millions of bacteria and deadly fungi locked inside the arctic ice that used to home the mammoths
Im worried when i grow up alot of animals are gonna go extinct so i will be happy that extinct animals are coming back to life but im also sad that todays animals will probably go extinct
@@captaincorps6673 Yes, it is. That is why they take ethics classes before they get their degree. Scientists are not robots and they do have a duty to weigh the risks and benefits, as well as the moral of what they are doing.
@@chibilaichi not every country follows so called “ethics” this video isn’t just about western nation scientist, it includes Chinese and Russian and every other countries scientist and well…
Ironically one of the most major contributions to the extiction level currently is power dams, which ironically has and is always praised for being such a great green source of renewable energy.
Another irony. SF6 is a thousand times the greenhouse gas Co2 is and is used for conductivity on windfarms which is emitted into atmosphere. Another irony Earth's greatest explosion in diversity of life happened when Co2 was 20 times higher than now!
@@Muckylittleme Fun Fact: People who care are actually looking for options to eliminate the use of SF6, and it has been banned, around the world, for many uses. Also when compared to CO², the volume of SF6 released into the environment still doesn't cause anywhere near the greenhouse effect. CO² is estimated to cause 80% of global warming, where SF6 causes about 0.2% Also, the rate at which the climate is changing does not allow for adaptation, and biodiversity is stressed because of it. Stop making excuses.
@@notahotshot I would say the idea Co2 causes 80% of global warming is bunk and remember they shut down clean burning coal plants to build wind farms belching out SF6 because they told you it was to save the planet. China is responsible for more Co2 output than the EU and US combined and is till exempt from carbon taxes and expensive legislation put on Western industry. The same wealthy elite who say you should eat plants and insects to save the planet made trillions by leaving China exempt and moving their industry and finance there to take advantage of cheap dirty cola energy and labour including child labour. China built hundreds of new dirty coal plants to fuel this new economic boom and industry which actually caused Co2 global emissions to rise rapidly for years after carbon taxes were introduced. But regardless Co2 is a trace gas in the atmosphere, around 0.04% or 400 particles per million. Of that probably only 1% of it is man made but let's go OTT and say 10% which is 0.004% of atmosphere. Now consider a nation like UK going net zero. The UK now produces less than 1% of global Co2 so around 0.00004% of atmosphere but given only a fraction of Co2 stays in the atmosphere and much of that for short while you can make that 0.00001% which means if it went net zero tomorrow there would be 1 particle per 10 million particles less of Co2 in the atmosphere but not immediately as it would take decades to dissipate fully, Now that is a while nation but the globalists say you must also make personal sacrifices on what you eat etc to do your part but people living ordinary lives only account for a tiny fraction of Co2 emissions so the population of Britain is around 65 million so you personally doing your bit would account for a change of 1 Co2 particle in 650,000,000 of atmosphere. But best all while you live like peasant dining on bugs the elite who tell you that you are saving the planet will still be flying their private jets and visiting their many mansions on their private Islands and cruising on their luxury yachts and dining on only the very best steaks off their private farms, Bill gates has bought an awful lot of farmland across the US lately. It is like they want to control food production and have their own farm lands. And Good old Bezos built himself a rocket because as we know rockets have tiny carbon footprints and when he got back he flew on his private jet to Cop26 to lecture you on how you needed to give up everything to save the planet because, you know carbon footprints and all that. Just remember Co2 has massively higher for hundreds of millions of years than now and the earth thrived, so what has changed other than a plan to bring in neo feudalistic technocratic global governance run by the elite who said they needed global crises to make global governance relevant?
I like this commentary a lot. It is clear, concise and the information delivered a pace which is easily understandable. It is not gimmicky, it gives a good DNA explanation and gives me hope that we can indeed bring these animals back to life. I note that this was made 3 years ago, so would like a revised version made with an update on the advancement of the science work.
It saddens me that we want to revive extinct species while we also let the very last Tasmanian tiger die of NEGLECT only 82 years ago! Easier to destroy than to create, right? smh
0:08 *That sounded like after the scooby doo squad has found the person behind the mask and they say “I would’ve gotten away with it if it weren’t for u meddling kids”* 😂😂😂
great video! i really appreciate how you delve into such intriguing topics. but honestly, i wonder if bringing back extinct species is more ethical than just focusing on preserving the ones we have left. it seems like we might just be playing god a bit, don’t you think?
"if you don't want to see be amazed go extinct hit the like button" the only thing more amazing than these facts is how smoothly we are persuaded to like and subscribe to the channel in every video. AMAZING !
Even though it sounds awesome I think we should worry more about the animals that are still alive and are going extinct then the animals that have been extinct for 100s or even 1000s of years ago.
I think if we are gonna be reviving any animals they should be animals that had gone extinct in the last century or two because the world is much different than during the time of the dinos. Also we should be trying to keep the endangered species alive today, because that will save us from having to “revive” them later on.
@@pandaiscool9552 I wonder if we can. Thinking about history, before us was the time of the megafauna, giant sloths, big cats and the like. Of all those species only three are left, Rhinos, Elephants and Giraffes so there's no certainty that we *can* save them. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try though.
The question shouldn't be when but rather why. Just because we can, don't mean we should. Everyone is focused on the benefits and not considering the dangers. I personally feel it is wonderful we are progressing but I'm not sure how many people are noticing we are progressing ourselves into extinction. We need to fix what we have without bringing in more uncertain variables.
I would love to see Be Amazed talk about introducing species into ecosystems where are not native to. Because I've heard that some animals have been brought into new ecosystems were they have no natural predators and they can devastate the natural species that are native to that area. I don't know if that sounded right. But I'd love to know what you find out.
I guess you are talking about Invasive species,well they aren't invasive but we humans made them by changing their habitat,eg-Burmis python(hope am not wrong)in Florida or something they were being brought their for domesticating and then were abandoned by some owners in surrounding habitat and now they suffer due to not having python's natural/archenemy in that area!and are invasive Species there!
@@divinerutuop7934 So what you're saying is they're invasive species that need to go back to where they came from? Idk if you know the meaning of invasive species but that's exactly what it means.
@@ricksanchez191 haha 😅bruh from which sentence did I give off statement that they need to go back to their natural habitat?I guess you misread it or either you are too quick at throwing words on keyboard!
@@ricksanchez191 And I didn't even disagree about his comment!I just told him whatever it (invasive species;cause he didn't get that proper word to remember I just wanted to pet him know maybe)is called!yeet yourself somewhere else
@@divinerutuop7934 Well I'm just saying most of them do, and also I'm not arguing with you, I'm just saying you described exactly what an invasive species was. Not my fault you don't know what you're talking about.
We don't have enough wilderness for the animals that exist on the planet now! Is it really fair to all the current animals to release dinosaurs so that they can eat them to extinction? 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
I think de-extinction is one of the best things humanity has done in a while. I’m all about improving the climate and if woolly mammoths can help do that, let’s get this done faster
I highly disagree with de-extinction unless the extinction was a result of recent human tampering and not natural selection. Natural selection exists for a very good reason. If you can't survive in the world naturally then you have outlived your time and are a detrement to the world and your genus. As we have seen in the past many many times before introducing ANY new species to a new ecosystem usually has dire consequences and has been a mistake that the ecosystem and people have paid for. Something as large as a mammoth would make an even larger impact. Mammoths are big boys!!! Let me put it in perspective how they could affect the ecosystem and quite literally destroy it. Look at the african elephant; villages pay people to hunt them because they stampede through villages and eat and decimate entire crops and fields leaving the villagers and other members of the ecosystem to starve when the elephant could have just grazed. That's a double edged sword though because the money hunters pay them to hunt elephants is also the main source of income for many areas. You can't just introduce something as large as a mammoth and not expect it to have many consequences, it would wipe out multiple species for the sake of one. Like I said they are big boys, so they eat ALOT. Many currently existing species could quite possibly starve into extinction as the mammoth is now consuming everything they used to eat, it happens, ecosystems are delicate and tend to have a domino effect: mammoths eat all of "x" animals food and they die out, then with "x" animals dying out the "y" animals that ate them starve because they don't have "x" animal to eat, then "z" animal dies out because there are no "y" animals to eat; so on and so forth untill you reach the top of the food chain. Plus I think everyone has seen Jurassic Park lol.
@@0001captainawesome I agree that animals should be brought back if they were killed by humans(such as the dodo) and these species would have to be re-introduced later down the line, when there are enough of them that they aren’t hunted to extinction again. Also, I never thought about the consequences to humans or other animals, thanks for bringing that to mind, I was mostly focused on the improving the climate aspect of it. In one of my classes, we started a paper on climate change, picking sides between it being a political issue or a scientific issue and I don’t understand how it can be political(yeah governments could help but it’s more agricultural, I think) anyway, the mammoths improving the climate brought that to mind and I thought it might be interesting to bring up.
I swear, if immortality becomes possible because of the whole de-extinction thing, ima freak out if i could live to see a wooly mammoth mixed with a T-rex
Mammoths could very well be brought back without dna construction. They existed from evolving in a cold environment. So if elephants somehow started breeding in a colder environment, then they could come back. But even with that, it would still be very hard
New species will adapt and evolve to whatever new environmental conditions you throw at it. That's the nature of evolution. Who knows what new species could and will evolve in the future. It's not our business to try to control nature. Imagine if modern human society happened 50,000 years ago instead of right now. Right in the middle of the last ice age. Now I'm sure there would be activists and hippies marching around with signs about saving the ice and protecting the sabertooth cats, and warning people of the extinction of humans and all life on the planet if the ice melts, gloom and doom psycho babble and all that, but just as there was life after the last ice age and all that ice melted, and animals and plants evolved to their new environmental conditions, the same will be true even if the climate change predictions of today are absolutely true. As usual, some species may die out and go extinct, but it's not for a lack of new species that will take their place. There will be no shortage. How could their be? The rising greenhouse gasses (CO) that people are going hysterical about today, are gravely important to the Earth's flora. A higher CO atmosphere would mean slightly warmer temperatures and an over abundance of plant nutrients, thus, larger, more healthy and more abundant plant life. Lowering CO levels will actually harm plants and even cause many species to become more susceptible to disease and extinction. Do you hate plants or something? Fuck the polar bears. They kill people. I say "save the ferns". Raise the CO!
@@weirds__ scientists just need to be careful. There are natural and environmental reasons species have gone extinct. There's no point in bringing extinct species back if the environmental and natural conditions that made them go extinct in the first place, are still missing. They'll just die out again, or be placed into Zoos and artificially reproduced for people's entertainment and profit.
Is it true that tigers might extinct soon? I did some researches and it says, there were only 2000-3900 tigers left..I'm not sure if it's true though, but I hope not.
That's if you cloned a wooly mammoth. the route there going is unpredictable what type of genetics will stick. It's not like there another Wooley mammoth to produce a clone like they did in the 90's with the sheep
@@an0ma1y72 They have extracted DNA from the frozen mammoths found in the Russian permafrost. Recently they found perfectly preserved lion cubs with food in their bellies - 3 or 4 cubs were discovered as well as Woolly Rhinoceros. China has produced articles on how gun-ho they are to clone from this DNA.
@@lizziesangi1602 Yeah but what don't know is there using the closest living relative aka the elephant as a means to make a clone. Therefore the offspring will have to be selectively breed to get as many of the qualities as we can of a mammoth we can. My point is there isn't a living mammoth to give the full genetic code. Just because you find intact DNA doesn't mean you have the full genetic code so we use the elephant to help fill those gaps
We’re essentially animals as well. We’ve made many mistakes but trying to fix them by a very unnatural use of science sounds far more scary than beneficial. It’s sad animals have to become extinct, but instead of putting great thought into bringing the animals back we should put our energy towards helping our environment so it doesn’t happen again
@@camroberts99 Yeah, bringing those animals back might be bad, since their environments have changed. They might just go extinct again, or kill off another species. Better to just prevent it from happening in the future.
They really missed an opportunity naming de-extinction as “dextinction” feels like a Pokédex reference for reviving fossils but it’s cool de-extinction ya know real original
Please bring back dinosaurs because i want to see the real life jurassic park in the philippines and bring back the t-rex orange spider will bite you edit will be painful and you're going to go to the doctor so you could get kicked out out
Yeah it sounds all cool, to have the possibility of getting to see all these old animals come back. But I think it's not a good idea bringing them back in this time period. Alot has changed in the world since they've been gone. From temperature to their food chain & food supply, & depending on where these old animals get placed on earth. Some of them may die out again, from this world's temperatures & due to getting hunted by other animals from this time period. There's a meant-to-be reason to why some animals go extinct, & to why some stay & evolve. Maybe a couple of these animals would do good coming back, the panda, all the different birds & other small animals shown in the video.
mammoth and all the small animals sure. I don’t really see a point to bring back the sabertooth tiger. If they don’t have benefit for our environment then there’s no point of bringing them back
@@novagotgame There’s no point in bringing them back besides wanting to see and study them in person. Trying to correct issues we’ve caused is kinda absurd if our reason is that “Humans have caused all this.” If we want to tamper with our environment we should just say it like it is. Modern scientists want us to believe humans are just bags of intellectual flesh so... we’re just animals. Anything we do is natural and will run its course in time. You might say humans causing global warming is all part of the worlds plot. I believe humans have a greater purpose in life (being managers of God’s creation) so we should try to fix our mistakes. But secular reasons are just absurd because if we’re animals then we shouldn’t tamper with the natural course of things
I recently found out about the white tail deer population in Eastern Jamaica. How's that possible? Well 6 escaped captivity during hurricane Gilbert, 1988. Now the population is approximately 6000 and growing rapidly. Imagine a Sabertooth tiger 🤔
For real I don't think messing with dead animals is a good thing we can't even save existing ones we need to save the pandas Tigers rhinos etc all these animals will be extinct by 2050 to 2100
@@Steve-zc9ht we don't need to save pandas,they aren't that useful. we need to save animals that are useful to the environment - at least first. even if they're not useful
Happy International Bee Day. Try to educate people about the role bees play in pollination about our food crops and other plants. Because of use of chemicals bee populations are getting reduced a lot faster. 🐝🐝
They keep finding wooly mammoth skeletons in South Florida and not too far from the surface, either. Makes me think we were in an ice age not too far in the past.
In the bible job speaks about a behemoth that resembles a brontosaurus that was currently alive when he was living. Though no one knows what time period that was.
@@timj1541 by the bible do you mean like the bible? Cause in science humans were species created through evolution. In religion believes god sent adam to earth.
Not that I believe it, but I have read several places that people have seen living Mammoths in Siberia. It would be soooo awesome. But sadly, I don't believe them.
I bet you 20 years later, scientists are gonna try bringing back tigers after they went extinct 2 years earlier while they were too busy trying to bring back the megalodon
The tone that this guy is speaking in makes me somewhat excited and curious for some reason🫠🤔🥹, and especially because the title says "DEAD Animals Scientists Are Close To Reviving"
While bringing extinct animals back would be revolutionary, it may be dangerous introducing them to their old environment after other animals have taken over. So while we are saving one species, another may perish
Why would Humans care? When was the last time anyone ever asked "should we do this?"
@@ericlamb4501 Bring back a predator in Australia would be a good way to get rid of mice and rabbits.
Yeah. Animals are the dangerous typo in Earth blueprint. :D
Chuba cabras
k . but that's not a good idea. The world climate isn't the same as it was when these dudes lived. YOu cannot replicate those environments outside. Just don't do it.
I'll stop worrying when i hear they brought back the dodo
@Creeperboss999 it's a bird
Dodds were killed by humans i think
Dodo birds were smart the only reason they were killed was: they look dumb, and they were not afraid of hoomans
Me to go dodo
Go dodos go
0:46-0:52
"What has huge tusks, a furry winter coat, and weighs about 6 tons?"
Muscle Man: "MY MOM!"
XD
LOL
@Aanya Rao shut uo
Damn boyyy
A mammot?
Love you videos bro editing is crazy and video is better 🔥
Yes, it would be cool to see extinct animals walk the earth again, but we need to focus more on keeping animals that are still walking the earth that are BECOMING extinct from becoming extinct. We should not worrying about bringing back mammoths, we should start working on multiplying animals like pandas, and other animals to keep them from becoming extinct. Worry about animals that are still alive rather than the ones is already dead.
Yeah, everyone's screaming about hwo cool it would be, but here you are spewing facts and no one listens....
if we perfect cloning it wont matter how many die we can just bring them back.
we just downloading the original version man doesn’t mean we’re not gonna keep the new
Boring 😴
Pandas are actually doing quite well now
I swear, one day I'm gonna look out of my window and see a god damn raptor just munching on something outside.
Fr tho😭🤣
IK RIGHT XD
True
IT IS A LIE THEY WILL NOT
LOL
keeping existing species alive is good, but reviving long lost animals could have negative impacts on today's ecosystem, which has been functioning without them for a very long time.
Exactly!
I agree but I could be good you never know
I agree dude this is not the year this is definitely not the year
The only negative impact on todays ecosystems are Humans
They will not release them into the nature they will be in a closed environment
0:47 Woolly Mammoth
6:19 Thylacine
11:09 Dodo
14:06 Moa
16:47 Siberian Unicorn
20:41 Passenger Pigeon
23:41 Sabertooth Tiger
-----
6:15 When the mammoth is sus
16:50 When the unicorn is sus
18:43 Did not adapt, growling stomach!
20:37 Here's looking at you, 'unicorn'!
22:45 YOWCH!
Thanks
Lol😅😂
🦤
Scientists in 3000: We are about to make a hybrid that will be exactly like Kong
Scientist 4:why would we do that we wouldn’t want to make shin king-
Kong is more easyier than godzilla
I prefer giant monke
@@peermohammed11 yah let me edit that
Âř*ķņ ţ&el ×el
This guy is basically the best teacher on UA-cam
Minecraft
And 2nd best bright dide
@@Leooo00 you mean bright side ?
Because that channel is good too but be amazed is still pretty underrated
@@lookitsyou7755 yes I like minecraft !
@@gamieplays4807 1v1 Minecraft bedrock the hive treasure wars my names XRK4 my brother chose the name it’s not my Xbox
Scientists in 20000: we are gonna bring a iguana with spikes on it.
Kinda like Godzilla???
@Ava-Rose Halford shut up
@ChannelnotfoundOof what did they do jerk!?
@@teresaglock7138 Shut up
Read more...
@A Guy On YT they are mean look
I personally think this might be extremely hard to do because the DNA from the bones skin, etc. might be too deteriorated to even use especially if it’s been over 1000 to 1,000,000,000 years it would be extremely hard to extract DNA from an animal that’s been alive thousands or even billions of years ago
Trust me 😂😂😂 it’s NOT that old. They want to grow these things to cause chaos on purpose
@@Blessedbereanmammano
"Just because you can doesn't mean you should." Ian Malcolm.
and in some cases, they should.
@@jacktheomnithere2127 so we can make them go extinct twice right? ... Right?
@@Miira88 so they can study them better and it will be a big leap in the science field if they can revive instinct animals. Just imagine at how many kind of works they can apply those?
It could make our medical prowess even greater and more.
It just carry so many benefits
@@lilylilylily2675 including planetary benefits, like what Professr Church is trying to achieve with Pleistoscene Park.
@@Miira88 Oh yes dodos will conquer the world
Reviving extinct species is not question of "can we?" It's more of a "should we?"
Right they gon eat us lol
We should bring the dodos back, that’s the only one.
ERIKA
When you get up close to wildlife they can be really kind. As the old saying goes "don't judge a book by its cover" and plus I used to be absolutely terrified of SNAKES but one day I had one put around my neck I thought that I was gonna face a fear and it was really fun actually I think the only thing I was scared of was them biting me but because it was at school they were all tamed we only had them at school because we were learning about endangered and extinct animals
So true
Scientists in 2050: Humans are classified as highly endangered due to introduction of terrifying creatures like...
Actual 2050: the human species lifespan has increased to120 years, most predators are either extinct or domesticated, and the secret of the dna is finally unlocked and mars and the moon is 50% terraformed and habitable to life and earth is more civilized than ever.
HELLO SMORT PEOPLE
@@canismajor8601 You are dreaming. Haven't you heard of man made history revision, so we can relive it?
@@canismajor8601 I barely even now what 75% of that means
Like what
6:38
Love it when you said that “extreme old-age of specimens” I rewind⏪again & again just to listens those 5 words lol
When he started talking about putting dna with other animals together that made me think “omg jurassic park is real”
Hi
For real
Lol
It most definitely is
Wow
Nothing is better than a be amazed video freshly baked out of the oven
Delicious entertainment oh ye
hello
@@suby_zeroyt2193 hi karen
Bruh you should stop making same comments over and over again
Nice
We were so busy wondering if we could, we never stopped to think if we should.
Really? "Edited"? Did you have to watch jurassic Park again to make sure you got the quote right? P.s. when you quote someone with THIER words you're supposed to place it in " "s.
Everyone knows it was from Jurassic park 🙄
@@nickbrockelman putting " " is so cringe nobody uses them also every idiot and his dog it was from the movie.
True that
Omg you guys are toxic chill man chill come come let's have a cup of tea and watch the video
"Yeah, but your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
- Ian Malcolm
Agreed
Jurassic park
Yes, this👆
Just bringing a species to a different country will change things why would you bring back an old ass animal that strived in different circumstances there’s no good place to put it but we love to fuck up the world for our amusement 🤷🏽♂️
They should.just work on bringing back thing we made go extinct like pandas or elephants or something
The Tasmanian Tiger actually used it’s tail to stand on its hind legs to search for prey, like the kangaroo
did you watch wild kratts
We really need to focus on getting our animals safe, many species are endangered and are the risk of extinction
Us: Willy mammoths, dodos, dinosaurs!!!
Elephants, tigers, and pandas: what the fuck guys!
So wouldn't figuring out how to bring them back when they go extinct help that.....
@@justinmopavich3408 it’s a different process for each dna of each animal
@@kronomcs bro animals are just gonna get hunted we stop hunters we stop the exstion
If we bring some animals back, it might help some of the ones going extinct today
I love your videos! Make some more please!
I hope they do bring back the Tasmanian tiger - Tasmania’s only predator. Since it’s been gone, small marsupials have run amuck and are constantly hit by cars.
Just wondering- it's been a while since I've researched it, but the tasmanian devil is a predator, right? Correct me if I'm wrong XD
@@lynnofmoonsclaws209 No, the Tasmanian devils are scavengers. They don’t hunt or kill living beings; they only eat dead creatures. The Tasmanian tiger was Tasmania’s only predator. The devils are actually quite adorable and can be tamed. Apparently they make great “watch devils” as they call them, as they make a very loud, menacing growl-cry that will curdle the blood!
@@deborahahonen6949 k thank you :)
@@deborahahonen6949 Sorry to tell you you are wrong. Tasmanian devils are hunters and can even take on a small kangaroo but in practice they are opportunistic and eat carrion more often than they hunt live prey.
Although the Devils favor wombats because of the ease of predation and high fat content, it will eat all small native mammals such as wallabies, bettong and potoroos, domestic mammals (including sheep and rabbits), birds (including penguins), fish, fruit, vegetable matter, insects, tadpoles, frogs and reptiles.
@@anita64 nice copy and paste from wiki
so if we can clone extinct animals can we clone red pandas THAT ARE ABOUT TO become extinct?
And white rhinos
@Britt Joy yeah we should
Agree👍
@@kronomcs White rhinos will always be extinct due to hunting
@@kronomcs I have seen white rhinos in many sorts of sites and many research on them and people are trying to clone and breed them as much as they can. It’s pretty cool except the fact that they can’t always have them in the same facilities and places that they are kept in and when they do be released, they might still be hunted as were before.
As interesting as it would be to see extinct species brought back into the world I think we should first focus on ending poaching and over hunting once and for all and then save the species that are currently endangered. We also have to focus on saving the planet we are destroying. If we can do all of this first then we can consider bringing back extinct animals.
I agree but what about raptors I don’t wanna raptor be my new best friend 💀
I agree, but sadly I don't think that will end for a long long time.
I agree but what if a t-Rex eats us
@@EEe-cs7qp dinosaurs DNA are to old
@@mick0806_ there DNA are to long to bring back
Some would say bringing back the saber tooth tiger wouldn’t be beneficial but I personally think the if we’re bringing the woolly mammoth back saber tooth’s could be used as a population control
The tiger wolves (yes I’m aware that’s not their real name) has actually been spotted I believe last year and they have a photo of what looks like a family (mother father and a cub) they can also open their months 90 degrees which is kinda cool but creepy
I was in Tasmania and learned a lot from museums and guides there. There are a bunch of people who claim they’ve spotted Tasmanian tigers in the wild, but scientists are very skeptical. I do hope there are some left, but it’s highly doubtful. Tasmania is now overrun with small marsupials that the ‘tigers’ kept in check. You almost can’t drive anywhere without hitting one or seeing them dead on the roads. Both the tigers and Tasmanian devils had/have jaws that open extremely wide and make very loud, intense growling/screaming noises. Amazing creatures!
There In Australia at a zoo to, with dingos
@@ayarttt it died in the early 1900’s sadly do to poor life. They kept it in a concrete area outdoors in the heat and cold as well as it wasn’t fed or watered enough
@@inzane5966 they have a animal same stripes on back n everything in Australia
I dont know why but whenever he says recently i start imaging the animals living in 1800's and 1900's.
Same lol
agreed
The mammoth would be cool to see revived. Especially being that they’re not gonna really hurt anything in the arctic.
No grass
Didn't you watch the video. The wooly mammoth would help keep the ice in the Arctic from melting and keep vegetation alive
@@davido3744 their immune systems would be so outdated they would die almost instantly. This is just another way for the government to steal your tax money.
@@DaRealKing303 what? they could easily survive todays bacteria there are millions of bacteria and deadly fungi locked inside the arctic ice that used to home the mammoths
@@faouri. that's not how it works. Lol
Amazing video!👍 Hope we get to see these magnificent creatures rule the earth again
Im worried when i grow up alot of animals are gonna go extinct so i will be happy that extinct animals are coming back to life but im also sad that todays animals will probably go extinct
Anything will go extinct one day
Funny you actually think it’s up to us to revive them. Humans will go extinct too yk?
I hope when panda goes extinct they can revive
Not unless scientist get dna from the endangered animals, and revive them
@@iisxmplyvxenii3550 it’s pretty arrogant to assume the animals we’re trying to revive will survive the next 100 years after being revived.
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with if they could, they didn't stop to think if they should."
Just what I was looking for. Thank you.
That’s not the job of a scientist
@@captaincorps6673 Yes, it is. That is why they take ethics classes before they get their degree. Scientists are not robots and they do have a duty to weigh the risks and benefits, as well as the moral of what they are doing.
@@chibilaichi not every country follows so called “ethics” this video isn’t just about western nation scientist, it includes Chinese and Russian and every other countries scientist and well…
Ironically one of the most major contributions to the extiction level currently is power dams, which ironically has and is always praised for being such a great green source of renewable energy.
$$$ pay for the positive news, and to hide the bad.
Another irony.
SF6 is a thousand times the greenhouse gas Co2 is and is used for conductivity on windfarms which is emitted into atmosphere.
Another irony
Earth's greatest explosion in diversity of life happened when Co2 was 20 times higher than now!
@@Muckylittleme
Fun Fact: People who care are actually looking for options to eliminate the use of SF6, and it has been banned, around the world, for many uses. Also when compared to CO², the volume of SF6 released into the environment still doesn't cause anywhere near the greenhouse effect. CO² is estimated to cause 80% of global warming, where SF6 causes about 0.2%
Also, the rate at which the climate is changing does not allow for adaptation, and biodiversity is stressed because of it.
Stop making excuses.
@@notahotshot I would say the idea Co2 causes 80% of global warming is bunk and remember they shut down clean burning coal plants to build wind farms belching out SF6 because they told you it was to save the planet.
China is responsible for more Co2 output than the EU and US combined and is till exempt from carbon taxes and expensive legislation put on Western industry.
The same wealthy elite who say you should eat plants and insects to save the planet made trillions by leaving China exempt and moving their industry and finance there to take advantage of cheap dirty cola energy and labour including child labour.
China built hundreds of new dirty coal plants to fuel this new economic boom and industry which actually caused Co2 global emissions to rise rapidly for years after carbon taxes were introduced.
But regardless Co2 is a trace gas in the atmosphere, around 0.04% or 400 particles per million.
Of that probably only 1% of it is man made but let's go OTT and say 10% which is 0.004% of atmosphere.
Now consider a nation like UK going net zero. The UK now produces less than 1% of global Co2 so around 0.00004% of atmosphere but given only a fraction of Co2 stays in the atmosphere and much of that for short while you can make that 0.00001% which means if it went net zero tomorrow there would be 1 particle per 10 million particles less of Co2 in the atmosphere but not immediately as it would take decades to dissipate fully,
Now that is a while nation but the globalists say you must also make personal sacrifices on what you eat etc to do your part but people living ordinary lives only account for a tiny fraction of Co2 emissions so the population of Britain is around 65 million so you personally doing your bit would account for a change of 1 Co2 particle in 650,000,000 of atmosphere.
But best all while you live like peasant dining on bugs the elite who tell you that you are saving the planet will still be flying their private jets and visiting their many mansions on their private Islands and cruising on their luxury yachts and dining on only the very best steaks off their private farms, Bill gates has bought an awful lot of farmland across the US lately. It is like they want to control food production and have their own farm lands.
And Good old Bezos built himself a rocket because as we know rockets have tiny carbon footprints and when he got back he flew on his private jet to Cop26 to lecture you on how you needed to give up everything to save the planet because, you know carbon footprints and all that.
Just remember Co2 has massively higher for hundreds of millions of years than now and the earth thrived, so what has changed other than a plan to bring in neo feudalistic technocratic global governance run by the elite who said they needed global crises to make global governance relevant?
Please bring back jurassic park i want to see the dinosaurs make the jurassic park in the philippines
WE LITERALLY HAVE AN ENTIRE MOVIE SERIES BASED OFF WHY THIS IS A BAD IDEA🦖🦕
Ya got a point
I wanna see dodo's just running around with their smol feet. 😂🖤
But people think they will conquer the world like Jurassic park
Dodo's are not like in the game Ark. They were fast runners. You likely wouldn't have been able to catch one on foot.
@@StacieMMeier i know
Ark
@Adolf Hitler wow what are you doing here? Im scrolling through and i See dis This mans Name in something about extinct animals 😂
1:14
He makes it sound as if 4000 years isn’t many years 😂😂😂
Lol Ikr
1600's wasn't that long ago if you know alot about history.
@Maddie The Whoodle oh
It's in comparison with the billions of years old that the earth is, or start of time ±12 billion years ago.
Isn't that long, comparable to the building of Stonehenge (over many phases)
"I love man, but man stupid"
-koko the monke
Ye
You mean gorrilla also I got the joke ok?
koko the Monke speaking facts
Koko be spitin bars
I like this commentary a lot. It is clear, concise and the information delivered a pace which is easily understandable. It is not gimmicky, it gives a good DNA explanation and gives me hope that we can indeed bring these animals back to life. I note that this was made 3 years ago, so would like a revised version made with an update on the advancement of the science work.
It saddens me that we want to revive extinct species while we also let the very last Tasmanian tiger die of NEGLECT only 82 years ago! Easier to destroy than to create, right? smh
WelL it is actually confirmed that the Tasmanian tiger was never extinct and has been living in the shadows for the past 80 yrs
@StraightWhiteMale Neglect has nothing to do with technology. My point is that there’s something wrong with the human mindset.
@@tidalbreeze2520 Thx for the info, so this vid isn’t up to date?
"Destruction screams, while creation remains quiet in the dark"
Well, people back then have a unsure mindset, but im glad that people care of the animals we know and love ❤️
0:08
*That sounded like after the scooby doo squad has found the person behind the mask and they say “I would’ve gotten away with it if it weren’t for u meddling kids”* 😂😂😂
Vilain - And that pesky dog!
Scooby - Rog?! Wrat rog!?
I was just thinking that. HA HA HA HA
@@nicu8346 😂
@@kassiml6408 sorry to burst your bubble, but they added a main character with ● skin color to Scooby-Doo
@@insectbite1714 🤨🤨 what’s that suppose to mean?
8:34 "for those who dont speak science,"
Thank you.
great video! i really appreciate how you delve into such intriguing topics. but honestly, i wonder if bringing back extinct species is more ethical than just focusing on preserving the ones we have left. it seems like we might just be playing god a bit, don’t you think?
I love this channel just the speakers voice is so soothing-
I saw someone else say this exact same thing LOL or Bro why do you copy
its a company
@@the_guy_must_die uh, its called how the internet works BUT its called stating your opinion, and many people share opinions 😲
@Lupa THANK YOU
thank you!
"if you don't want to see be amazed go extinct hit the like button" the only thing more amazing than these facts is how smoothly we are persuaded to like and subscribe to the channel in every video. AMAZING !
Yy⁵right s
See this amazing video about how to survive a covid 😷apocalypse and please subscribe ua-cam.com/video/hikRb9qNYgw/v-deo.html
@@eanish1413 F off dude
@@Pitau87 why are you mean
I would also like to know about reviving extinct plants. Many specimens collected by botanists were dried and preserved. Are the genes still viable?
if you're young there is a possibility you will live the rest of you're life with mammoths
Ok im 15 and 30
Im 10 lol
I 7
I 1
I’m 8… Great info now I’m living with a hairy elephant
In a few years I’m gonna see the Jurassic world velociraptor eating rat in my garden
If they keep making the breeding different we should
D have a Trex form a chicken
I heard “We Might Be Getting The Jurassic Park In Real Life” I was like hell naw💀💀
Even though it sounds awesome I think we should worry more about the animals that are still alive and are going extinct then the animals that have been extinct for 100s or even 1000s of years ago.
I think if we are gonna be reviving any animals they should be animals that had gone extinct in the last century or two because the world is much different than during the time of the dinos. Also we should be trying to keep the endangered species alive today, because that will save us from having to “revive” them later on.
@@pandaiscool9552 agreed 100 percent
@@pandaiscool9552 I wonder if we can. Thinking about history, before us was the time of the megafauna, giant sloths, big cats and the like. Of all those species only three are left, Rhinos, Elephants and Giraffes so there's no certainty that we *can* save them. That doesn't mean we shouldn't try though.
Kind of true
I agree
This channel is incredible at bringing great quality content to us.
👏🏽👏🏽
Too bad that the narrator i loved is not around anymore, without him the videos are stale , I don't even know his name....
See this amazing video about how to survive a covid 😷apocalypse and please subscribe ua-cam.com/video/hikRb9qNYgw/v-deo.html
@@eanish1413 F off dude
No 😂 a
BRO NOT SURE WHAT IS
You’ve inspired me to try this when I’m older!
The question shouldn't be when but rather why. Just because we can, don't mean we should. Everyone is focused on the benefits and not considering the dangers. I personally feel it is wonderful we are progressing but I'm not sure how many people are noticing we are progressing ourselves into extinction. We need to fix what we have without bringing in more uncertain variables.
well, i think they want to bring the mammoths back so that global warming doesnt get like 4 times more powerful when tons of permafrost melt
Oh 40k likes last video and we like animals other video My comments 40 k likes can't we donate more
This Is what jurassic park is about
EXACTLY
if it was a man made extinction then bring it back
0:46 the woolly mammoth
6:18 thylacine
16:46 Siberian unicorn
20:40 passenger pigeon
23:39 sabretooth tiger
Please not the dinosaur
Where’s the dodo?
@@illusixnn W❤ b
Yo thx
I would love to see Be Amazed talk about introducing species into ecosystems where are not native to. Because I've heard that some animals have been brought into new ecosystems were they have no natural predators and they can devastate the natural species that are native to that area. I don't know if that sounded right. But I'd love to know what you find out.
I guess you are talking about Invasive species,well they aren't invasive but we humans made them by changing their habitat,eg-Burmis python(hope am not wrong)in Florida or something they were being brought their for domesticating and then were abandoned by some owners in surrounding habitat and now they suffer due to not having python's natural/archenemy in that area!and are invasive Species there!
@@divinerutuop7934 So what you're saying is they're invasive species that need to go back to where they came from? Idk if you know the meaning of invasive species but that's exactly what it means.
@@ricksanchez191 haha 😅bruh from which sentence did I give off statement that they need to go back to their natural habitat?I guess you misread it or either you are too quick at throwing words on keyboard!
@@ricksanchez191 And I didn't even disagree about his comment!I just told him whatever it (invasive species;cause he didn't get that proper word to remember I just wanted to pet him know maybe)is called!yeet yourself somewhere else
@@divinerutuop7934 Well I'm just saying most of them do, and also I'm not arguing with you, I'm just saying you described exactly what an invasive species was. Not my fault you don't know what you're talking about.
I am so happy that thylacines can be revived.
It will be a great idea, as long as they’re monitored for developmental behavior long before being released into the wild
Exactly because I this has Jurassic Park written all over it
Yeah lets bring back animals so they can live in human made prisons😂
No I like it Jurassic Park style.. LET THE RUN FREE.....
@@zennation4468 YEAH.. LET THEY DO WHAT THEY DOO... WOOOO JURASSIC PARK...
We don't have enough wilderness for the animals that exist on the planet now! Is it really fair to all the current animals to release dinosaurs so that they can eat them to extinction? 🤦🏼♀️🤦🏼♀️
Pretty sure there is a movie about bringing back extinct animals and it didn’t work out
I would still work there
@@kingothesilentswordsman4440 lmao I would to
I dunno what you're talking about. IT worked out pretty well. They had a very high success rate with bringing them back, after all!
Well we could bring SOME back, Back in the day there were these frogs that went instinct and then they got DNA and got more
They bring back ants and ants kill everyone
I think de-extinction is one of the best things humanity has done in a while. I’m all about improving the climate and if woolly mammoths can help do that, let’s get this done faster
I highly disagree with de-extinction unless the extinction was a result of recent human tampering and not natural selection. Natural selection exists for a very good reason. If you can't survive in the world naturally then you have outlived your time and are a detrement to the world and your genus. As we have seen in the past many many times before introducing ANY new species to a new ecosystem usually has dire consequences and has been a mistake that the ecosystem and people have paid for. Something as large as a mammoth would make an even larger impact. Mammoths are big boys!!! Let me put it in perspective how they could affect the ecosystem and quite literally destroy it. Look at the african elephant; villages pay people to hunt them because they stampede through villages and eat and decimate entire crops and fields leaving the villagers and other members of the ecosystem to starve when the elephant could have just grazed. That's a double edged sword though because the money hunters pay them to hunt elephants is also the main source of income for many areas. You can't just introduce something as large as a mammoth and not expect it to have many consequences, it would wipe out multiple species for the sake of one. Like I said they are big boys, so they eat ALOT. Many currently existing species could quite possibly starve into extinction as the mammoth is now consuming everything they used to eat, it happens, ecosystems are delicate and tend to have a domino effect: mammoths eat all of "x" animals food and they die out, then with "x" animals dying out the "y" animals that ate them starve because they don't have "x" animal to eat, then "z" animal dies out because there are no "y" animals to eat; so on and so forth untill you reach the top of the food chain.
Plus I think everyone has seen Jurassic Park lol.
@@0001captainawesome I agree that animals should be brought back if they were killed by humans(such as the dodo) and these species would have to be re-introduced later down the line, when there are enough of them that they aren’t hunted to extinction again. Also, I never thought about the consequences to humans or other animals, thanks for bringing that to mind, I was mostly focused on the improving the climate aspect of it. In one of my classes, we started a paper on climate change, picking sides between it being a political issue or a scientific issue and I don’t understand how it can be political(yeah governments could help but it’s more agricultural, I think) anyway, the mammoths improving the climate brought that to mind and I thought it might be interesting to bring up.
@@0001captainawesome Lol a essay
Looks like good eating on those moas to me.
@@justsomesquonk Yeah, i think the same unless there using a engendered animal to review one.
POV: *4000 years later*
Some random little kid says
Mommy what are elephants in UA-cam
Imagine one day you just look out the window and just see a damn raptor just walking along the sidewalk minding its own business
It's impossible there DNA are to old you people make me mad
It was a joke Einstein you don’t have to get all aggressive
@@shallowwaters7147 I know, right? Some people can't take a joke :>
Me:*sees Tasmanian tiger* "GOD YES THANK YOU SO MUCH!"
I swear, if immortality becomes possible because of the whole de-extinction thing, ima freak out if i could live to see a wooly mammoth mixed with a T-rex
uhhhh
Thanks for the weird pic in my hed
@@sangeethapraveen476 right 😂😂
pls fix my brain
dna splicing ?
23:35 people watching this in 2024: 🤔 are any here yet, because you got a year left
Fr
Mammoths could very well be brought back without dna construction. They existed from evolving in a cold environment. So if elephants somehow started breeding in a colder environment, then they could come back. But even with that, it would still be very hard
and take millions of years once the human race is gone we cant ensure there survival long term... although i do see your point👍
🐅 I have a question. if a
If an animal Can you bring it back to life Again.🐅🐆🦁🦊🐺🦍🦬🐑🦣🐘🐀🐨🐻❄️🐼🐼🦣🐮🐱🐶🐶🐴🐴🦬
Good point, polar bears are going to evolve to become brown bears in colour again as ice melts.
True
This sounds really cool but we still have thousands of other animals to worry about.
Instead of reviving the dead, we should instead focus on preserving what's alive and put in measures to prevent this from continuing.
We want them back
New species will adapt and evolve to whatever new environmental conditions you throw at it. That's the nature of evolution. Who knows what new species could and will evolve in the future. It's not our business to try to control nature.
Imagine if modern human society happened 50,000 years ago instead of right now. Right in the middle of the last ice age. Now I'm sure there would be activists and hippies marching around with signs about saving the ice and protecting the sabertooth cats, and warning people of the extinction of humans and all life on the planet if the ice melts, gloom and doom psycho babble and all that, but just as there was life after the last ice age and all that ice melted, and animals and plants evolved to their new environmental conditions, the same will be true even if the climate change predictions of today are absolutely true. As usual, some species may die out and go extinct, but it's not for a lack of new species that will take their place. There will be no shortage. How could their be? The rising greenhouse gasses (CO) that people are going hysterical about today, are gravely important to the Earth's flora. A higher CO atmosphere would mean slightly warmer temperatures and an over abundance of plant nutrients, thus, larger, more healthy and more abundant plant life. Lowering CO levels will actually harm plants and even cause many species to become more susceptible to disease and extinction. Do you hate plants or something? Fuck the polar bears. They kill people. I say "save the ferns". Raise the CO!
@@skydriver5709Jesus need his creations
we should conider both.
@@weirds__ scientists just need to be careful. There are natural and environmental reasons species have gone extinct. There's no point in bringing extinct species back if the environmental and natural conditions that made them go extinct in the first place, are still missing. They'll just die out again, or be placed into Zoos and artificially reproduced for people's entertainment and profit.
Is it true that tigers might extinct soon? I did some researches and it says, there were only 2000-3900 tigers left..I'm not sure if it's true though, but I hope not.
Im sorry, but it’s true
Wait. Tigers are going extinct?
@@nicolesmith9277 yeah, they have been for awhile now.
@@joedunn7434 If it's taking sso long, there might be a chance to save them :D
Can someone try to know the population of tigers right now?? I can't find and I did a few research
Mammoths has a 2nd sideaffect it's fur can reflect infrared radiation
That's if you cloned a wooly mammoth. the route there going is unpredictable what type of genetics will stick. It's not like there another Wooley mammoth to produce a clone like they did in the 90's with the sheep
Just like every thing else where are they when you need 'em?
@@an0ma1y72
They have extracted DNA from the frozen mammoths found in the Russian permafrost. Recently they found perfectly preserved lion cubs with food in their bellies - 3 or 4 cubs were discovered as well as Woolly Rhinoceros. China has produced articles on how gun-ho they are to clone from this DNA.
@@an0ma1y72 q
@@lizziesangi1602 Yeah but what don't know is there using the closest living relative aka the elephant as a means to make a clone. Therefore the offspring will have to be selectively breed to get as many of the qualities as we can of a mammoth we can. My point is there isn't a living mammoth to give the full genetic code. Just because you find intact DNA doesn't mean you have the full genetic code so we use the elephant to help fill those gaps
I’d love if they brought back the dodo bird… sure they are clumsy and flightless but it would be so cool to see one!
"Most people only care about you when you're dead"
Low-key facts tho
Pterodactyls might be tameable if we bring them back one day.
Imagine flying to school or work on one.
Until someone infects it and makes it go crazy then it kills the whole world
@UwU NUZZEL♡ what is your alternative ?
I think that it’s our duty to restore these species, because we played a part in their destruction.
I'm sure men in animal skins with pointed sticks did not cause most of themes extinction.
Meanwhile we continue to threaten our entire planet.?...
They possibly are gonna destroy things if they were alive
We’re essentially animals as well. We’ve made many mistakes but trying to fix them by a very unnatural use of science sounds far more scary than beneficial. It’s sad animals have to become extinct, but instead of putting great thought into bringing the animals back we should put our energy towards helping our environment so it doesn’t happen again
@@camroberts99 Yeah, bringing those animals back might be bad, since their environments have changed. They might just go extinct again, or kill off another species. Better to just prevent it from happening in the future.
can we all agree his voice is so calming
They really missed an opportunity naming de-extinction as “dextinction” feels like a Pokédex reference for reviving fossils but it’s cool de-extinction ya know real original
LOL
Haha
Please bring back dinosaurs because i want to see the real life jurassic park in the philippines and bring back the t-rex orange spider will bite you edit will be painful and you're going to go to the doctor so you could get kicked out out
I remember watching a documentary with my granny about the Thylacine that died due to neglect. Its really sad
When I think about de-extinction of animals, I get so excited that I might cry...💜
So, you're telling me Aussies managed to kill off the Thlyacine through a bounty system, but couldn't keep some fucking giant birds under control?
Yeah it sounds all cool, to have the possibility of getting to see all these old animals come back. But I think it's not a good idea bringing them back in this time period. Alot has changed in the world since they've been gone. From temperature to their food chain & food supply, & depending on where these old animals get placed on earth. Some of them may die out again, from this world's temperatures & due to getting hunted by other animals from this time period. There's a meant-to-be reason to why some animals go extinct, & to why some stay & evolve. Maybe a couple of these animals would do good coming back, the panda, all the different birds & other small animals shown in the video.
mammoth and all the small animals sure. I don’t really see a point to bring back the sabertooth tiger. If they don’t have benefit for our environment then there’s no point of bringing them back
@@novagotgame There’s no point in bringing them back besides wanting to see and study them in person. Trying to correct issues we’ve caused is kinda absurd if our reason is that “Humans have caused all this.” If we want to tamper with our environment we should just say it like it is. Modern scientists want us to believe humans are just bags of intellectual flesh so... we’re just animals. Anything we do is natural and will run its course in time. You might say humans causing global warming is all part of the worlds plot. I believe humans have a greater purpose in life (being managers of God’s creation) so we should try to fix our mistakes. But secular reasons are just absurd because if we’re animals then we shouldn’t tamper with the natural course of things
That is exactly what I’m saying
Watching this only reminded me of the great line:
We were so busy wondering if we can, we forgot to ask if we should….
This has such a great vibe
See this amazing video about how to survive a covid 😷apocalypse and please subscribe ua-cam.com/video/hikRb9qNYgw/v-deo.html
@Imperial Officer based
You are so good at explaining🥺
I recently found out about the white tail deer population in Eastern Jamaica. How's that possible? Well 6 escaped captivity during hurricane Gilbert, 1988. Now the population is approximately 6000 and growing rapidly. Imagine a Sabertooth tiger 🤔
There are 5 (about to be 6) movies and two, really good books explaining how this is a bad idea.
Names please?
jurasic park
uh probably
I LOVE the idea of bringing back or helping ALL ANIMALS that NEED help please help our environment
You are my 3rd favorite youtuber
Reanimation Jutsu:
Undead T-Rex: Jurassic park roar intensifies
See this amazing video about how to survive a covid 😷apocalypse and please subscribe ua-cam.com/video/hikRb9qNYgw/v-deo.html
@@eanish1413 F off dude
nah bro we need no t-rex we gotta reanimate dodo birb
@@muin_ we need da funky lookin dodo birb
@@mintgreen4291 yes
Elephant: can i copy ur homework?
Mammoth: NO
Ikr
Close to bringing back From extinction?
Me: are you ok?! Are you high?!
Scientists: yes!
Me: we all gonna die!
For real I don't think messing with dead animals is a good thing we can't even save existing ones we need to save the pandas Tigers rhinos etc all these animals will be extinct by 2050 to 2100
They gon kill us all with an experiment gone wrong
exactly, these are smart grown people that never mentally grew up
@@Steve-zc9ht we don't need to save pandas,they aren't that useful. we need to save animals that are useful to the environment - at least first. even if they're not useful
I think that scientists haven’t watched Jurassic Park
Tbh i really want moa coming back to life lol. I once imagined riding moa to school xD
The dodo is now going to be an animal i wish i could see in real life 🙂🙏
Me to
we all want to
Me to
It’s eating time
i would love to have one as a pet
Happy International Bee Day. Try to educate people about the role bees play in pollination about our food crops and other plants. Because of use of chemicals bee populations are getting reduced a lot faster. 🐝🐝
Bees are extremely needed for pollination.Without them we wouldn't be alive
See this amazing video about how to survive a covid 😷apocalypse and please subscribe ua-cam.com/video/hikRb9qNYgw/v-deo.html
What? Bees are dumb one chased today they don't do anything. Fake comment
@@insectbite1714 the food you eat is pollinated by bees.
@@Yash-up5gz I eat only seafood you Zoomer.
Can't stop watching. So good!!!❤❤❤❤❤
15:17 i can say for certainty that if the moa does return one of the fast food chains will be selling it to us and calling it CHICKEN ROFL
They keep finding wooly mammoth skeletons in South Florida and not too far from the surface, either. Makes me think we were in an ice age not too far in the past.
I heard that mammoths were still around when the pyramids were being built.
In the bible job speaks about a behemoth that resembles a brontosaurus that was currently alive when he was living. Though no one knows what time period that was.
@@timj1541 by the bible do you mean like the bible?
Cause in science humans were species created through evolution.
In religion believes god sent adam to earth.
@@kamijounotouma4686 I mean the bible how God created Adam and every animal.
Well technically we are still in an ice age. As long as one or more continents are covered in ice we will remain
This makes me happy, I feel that I am at peace now
Who was waiting for the dodo 🦤 🗿
Me
Me I love birds
My best friend dodo 🦤 🗿🗿
Me
I love dodo’s
Me🔥🔥
“The northern part of North America” is also called Canada that’s were the mammoths lived
I guess they worded it that way because mammoths were technically never in Canada as there was no Canada at the time.
Not that I believe it, but I have read several places that people have seen living Mammoths in Siberia. It would be soooo awesome. But sadly, I don't believe them.
I bet you 20 years later, scientists are gonna try bringing back tigers after they went extinct 2 years earlier while they were too busy trying to bring back the megalodon
The tone that this guy is speaking in makes me somewhat excited and curious for some reason🫠🤔🥹, and especially because the title says "DEAD Animals Scientists Are Close To Reviving"