The Hart vs. Devlin Encore Debate

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @yasarakodagoda7624
    @yasarakodagoda7624 4 роки тому +11

    needed this for my jurisprudence paper for the case study on assisted suicide in England. so thank you!!

    • @mukundbali5076
      @mukundbali5076 4 роки тому +1

      Hey! I'm conducting some research on a very similar topic, but with reference to euthanasia in India. Would it be possible for you to maybe send me a copy of your paper so that I can try and gain a better understanding of how to approach it?

  • @JustAnotherThisDJ
    @JustAnotherThisDJ 5 років тому +8

    After trawling through paper after paper and R v Smith and summaries of Hart and Devlin's writings as well as mills and the rest I keep coming back to this video to get a grip. Oh I'm overwhelmed with information and struggling to explain about morality but this video really helps me focus. Michael Kirby I salute you l.

  • @colinwilliams9855
    @colinwilliams9855 10 років тому +10

    Thanks for this! It really helped my studies.

  • @DenizBadeAkkoyun
    @DenizBadeAkkoyun 5 років тому +5

    I'm only 10 mins in and already hooked. So interesting!

  • @PitufinaRadioactiva
    @PitufinaRadioactiva 11 років тому +2

    Un crá el viejo! Hi, I'm from Uruguay, and I love the Michael Kirby argument/speech! I want to have professor like him in our public University

  • @rosew8495
    @rosew8495 6 років тому +1

    As someone whose analyzing and discussing the conflict of law and morality highlighted in the Trinity Western University vs. LSUC case right now, J. Kirby's concluding speech was moving. There is no life without liberty.

  • @ankurmishra5933
    @ankurmishra5933 3 роки тому +5

    Welcome Mnlu Students.

  • @friendlyattack1181
    @friendlyattack1181 2 роки тому

    What we can and should do with that liberty is engage and understand each other

  • @mcbigmacmoedonaldsfoe3382
    @mcbigmacmoedonaldsfoe3382 4 роки тому +6

    10:50 summary

  • @faithgermage8583
    @faithgermage8583 6 років тому +1

    thanx for this video

  • @ombatinyanchamadelphine6163
    @ombatinyanchamadelphine6163 2 роки тому

    This was insightful

  • @friendlyattack1181
    @friendlyattack1181 2 роки тому

    The atomised individual and society "over and above" are not the only forms where society exists. There is family, local community, religious community, friends, work life, sport, wider society, local government, many different settings and spheres for different purposes.
    A common set of values could include shared recognition and respect for variety and differing values privately held. One of those values could be the privately held tolerance of multiple values. People can coexist and communicate and benefit society without being totally integrated morally, that's more akin to assimilation.

  • @daphneomoijiade9324
    @daphneomoijiade9324 3 роки тому

    Thank youuuuu

  • @enlighteneddespot9359
    @enlighteneddespot9359 2 роки тому

    Funny, 9 years later, how much law is required to enforce the lack of laws.... there is a natural law argument there for the next debate

  • @chrisgumb8986
    @chrisgumb8986 9 років тому +16

    I feel really bad for those who had to defend Devlin's stance in this debate.

  • @150_md.mahinabdullah7
    @150_md.mahinabdullah7 2 роки тому +1

    I believe in Devlin supremacy

  • @bhagawatibhandari7832
    @bhagawatibhandari7832 2 роки тому

    So relevancy

  • @faronray5903
    @faronray5903 Рік тому

    5-6.20

  • @friendlyattack1181
    @friendlyattack1181 2 роки тому

    Gan on rupert

  • @toppcatt5113
    @toppcatt5113 Рік тому +1

    So its law and order versus sexual perversion, in a nutshell.

  • @dahliapathak7618
    @dahliapathak7618 10 місяців тому

    Iiiibbiiiiiiiiiiijiiiii 😊