6 CCD sensor Camera Comparison! best image quality , deep test!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 жов 2024
- hello my nostalgic friends!
in this video we see the comparison between 6 vintage digital cameras
with particular sensors!
tell me wich one do you prefer :)
I enjoy listening to you speak.
An interesting collection of CCD sensor cameras plus the vintage lumix. Familiar with Pentax K200D, Olympus E-300 and Nikon 200D all have their own virtues and some inherent idiosyncrasies. Agree on Olympus for convenient compact size and ease of use. Nikon 200D is a monster with great functionality. Pentax in my experience accurate colour rendition. Liked your cheerful positivity. Good video.
I read so many forum posts years ago, complaining about focusing issues with the 16-45. The Pentax is up there if it wasn't for those soft images. I can also recommend the Nikon D3000. I grabbed one, because it has the 10 MP D200 sensor. It also sits quite good in the hands, has a bigger Display and a way easier menu system than the semi pro model. A d200 in a D40 body. It's a sharp little shooter!
I used the d200 for some time. I found it in a hospital charity for very little as not working. I changed the batteries, replaced the broken glass and leathers, and in the end I resuscitated it fully. I used it with an 18-55 vr ii and a tamron 135mm 2.8 and it delivered very good results. I used it in the uk winter, with little light available and poor subjects and it never let me down in the countryside. I ended up selling it to a friend as I felt having more than 1 camera was redundant (i use Fujifilm) but overall i felt like i was using a proper and reliable dslr. I miss it dearly and if i only had nikon i would have treated it with some special f lenses. Ciao ragazzo
Actually the last CCD camera Nikon produced was the D3000, yes; entry level but a very capable camera.
I have a k10D. The colours are great. JPEGs are slightly soft but, I don’t use them. The RAW files are great. This was my first digital camera. It is capable of making excellent images and the range and quality of lenses available to it is immense. It is very well made. I bought a K-01 next and suddenly realised that the softness in my K10D is actually a back-focus issue. I was manual focusing for more critical work. I thought the K10D might have a setting in the menu to adjust focus but it doesn’t. I must get its autofocus calibrated to see what more I can get from it. The Pentax is a true photographer’s camera with very 3D rendering. It won a TIPA award when it was introduced so, it was a very strong offering at the time. It loves bright sunny days and flash. The files are good in Lightroom but with less dynamic range than a modern camera. The under exposure keeps details in the highlights. The big caveat however is that the images you shot in your can all be made very similar by Lightroom. You can even throw a modern CMOS camera into the mix and after editing make it hard to spot worthwhile differences. The RAW file is king and our finished edit is what counts. Modern cameras give better processed output that is more ready to go and the myth of CCD may not be as powerful as we imagine.
Only an Italian calls dslr "reflex" 😂 ben fatto, caro, ottimo video
Sei bravo! Mi sono iscritto al canale soltanto perche mi piacce tanto la pizza. No, scherzo. Parlando sul serio, che ottimo confronto hai fatto. Capolaboro, con tutti i dettagli per confrontare. Congratulazioni, anche perché sei naturale e non sei in posa. Stavo proprio pensando ad una D200 per avere una camera CCD come complemento alla mia D700 e D3S. Sono ancora un po' emozionato per questo video e lo guarderò più volte, ma vedo che Sony aveva dei buoni colori, anche se a volte il cielo era un po' confuso. Sorpreso da Minolta e adoro lo stile da Lumix L1. Olympus non mi sorprende perché ho una EM5 per quando voglio andare leggero. Il tuo lavoro è interessante e non so come fai a non notare l'accento italiano quando parli inglese.🍕
Hi, I also have several of those , or similar. As with everything else, it's up to your preference, as a single thing you enjoy in a particular camera can overshadow everything else, and that one will become your choice. But as you, i take pictures with them all, and enjoy them one at a time.Of all my Oly E-400 broke- without being abused, and I damaged my E-3 , but now have E1 and E-620, both nice.
My first DSLR was the KM 5D then followed by the 7D. I just loved the color rendition of those compared to the clinical results in modern cameras. I used mostly Sigma lenses which of course further improved the warm, organic look of the images in most scenarios. About the massive Lumix body, it looks like the Fujifilm GFX 50R and that is medium format :-)
My first DSLR was a Sony A100 and it was a big disappointment in terms of reliability and practicality, how it worked... Autofocus is unreliable, dust on the sensor collected very quickly, in short, there were many such problems beyond the functionality and specifications. I thought it was just the baggage of age, but then I had to work with a Nikon D80 and it just worked. No problems. It was a shock.
All these sensors are very similar, you could say it's the same sensor, which balances detail and noise differently. The 6 megapixel one may be a little better at high ISO, but most cameras with this sensor don't have ISO 100.
In general, I recommend that beginners skip this part of the camera history and look at cameras at least a generation newer, which have live view. One way or another, a beginner will encounter problems with autofocus. If it is not a kit lens, then a cheap fifty will miss. And on cameras with live view, there is at least a way to accurately focus manually, if such a problem arises. In addition you have a live histogram and any work with a tripod becomes more convenient and you are less limited in angles - these are all important things. The absence of these things can make shooting uncomfortable, can limit you or frustrate you. As for the magical "CCD colors"... You won't be able to tell them apart in a blind test, and even if you do, it's a slight difference in the interpretation of tone and temperature and perhaps a few points in the HSL tab in Photoshop, it's not like the difference between fresh Porta and an expired AGFA 400. I am sure that the difference from model to model is greater than the difference between a CMOS and a CCD, and the influence of your habits in setting the white balance or how camera do it in auto is even greater. "Lifeless" (lol) CMOS colors won't be a problem for you if you're serious about photography.
i have bought the a390 as it was the last ccd sensor cam from sony / minolta :D
I've also have the Minolta 5d and the e400 . The. Colour and image quality of the e400 I find to be really good the kit len of the e400 is also really good. I got the 5d cheap as it has the first black frame issue but easy fix by just switching it off .
Fujifilm s5pro very good CCD camera
Yes, I have two that I still use.
I have 2 Pentax CCD sensor cameras I bought both new a *istDL & a K100D I still use both cameras monthly I trade off using both cameras . Modern editing programs make my pictres colors really stand out. My Pentax cameras seem to under espouse as well and that's why modern editing programs are so important
Mine too. Use AV, then you can also increase manual exposure to +1 or a little more. Play with AE setting too.
@@knikk77
Thanks I will give it a try as I normally photograph in AV mode
I have a 290 and 390. 390 seams to be better. D200 is behaving strange. Close up photos turn out good but landscapes are difficult to get good. I have many old cameras. They all behave differently and when you spend a whole day with one camera and one out of ten pictures or less turns out good its very disappointing. Fuji X-T100 is so much better. Almost all pictures comes out good.