What Happens INSIDE a Black Hole?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 27 вер 2024
- We explore the curved regions of spacetime called white holes. Go to incogni.com/as... to get an exclusive 60% off an annual Incogni plan.
Astrum Podcast: www.buzzsprout...
Displate Posters: displate.com/p...
Astrum Merch! astrum-shop.fo...
Join us on the Astrum discord: / discord
SUBSCRIBE for more videos about space and astronomy.
Subscribe! goo.gl/WX4iMN
Facebook! goo.gl/uaOlWW
Twitter! goo.gl/VCfejs
Astrum Spanish: / @astrumespanol
Astrum Portuguese: / @astrumbrasil
Donate!
Patreon: goo.gl/GGA5xT
Become a Patron today and support my channel! Donate link above. I can't do it without you. Thanks to those who have supported so far!
Credits:
Writer - David Shlivko
Editor - André Rodrigues
Narrator - Alex McColgan
References:
White Holes as Remnants: A Surprising Scenario for the End of a Black Hole, Eugenio Bianchi et al 2018 Class. Quantum Grav. 35 225003 (bit.ly/4auMYSQ)
How big is a black hole? Marios Christodoulou and Carlo Rovelli, Phys. Rev. D 91, 064046 - Published 20 March 2015 (bit.ly/43GPK59)
Spacetime and Geometry (textbook by Sean Carroll)
![[UA] Eternal Fire проти NAVI | EPL Season 20 Malta](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/chvlsDygrZM/mqdefault.jpg)
What did you think about my new endroll for Patreon members? I think it definitely looks better than the old static text. If you want to be on the spaceship or twinkle as a star (while supporting the channel!), join my Patreon here: www.patreon.com/astrumspace
Thanks
Alex
That was a great endroll, Alex!
you really are a clickbait king aren't you!!!
Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
Singularities are dual, positive is dual to negative -- electric charge or numbers, curvature.
White holes are dual to black holes.
Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic (duality).
Points (singularities) are dual to lines -- the principal of duality in geometry.
White holes are negative curvature singularities -- hyperbolic space (divergent).
Convergent (black holes, syntropic) is dual to divergent (white hole, big bang, entropic).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
It’s great!
But, that’s not a picture of a black hole. That’s a plasmoid. And yes, there are thousands of them. Black holes are STILL just a theory, along with white ones. Sorry. Try again.
Also, it’s electro-dynamic forces, not gravity. It’s a plasmoid breaking down and neutrons escaping those forces and shooting out in vast jets. Black holes are ludicrous if you think about it. If nothing can escape a black hole, why would ANYTHING escape it. Everything is a fractal. So everything that is observed in space, can be recreated on Earth, on a smaller scale. Plasma cosmologists can observe plasmoids in the lab. You can’t make a black hole in a lab because they don’t exist, because The Big Bang didn’t happen.
I'm not a physicist, but the idea that the 'big bang' is the outflow of a black hole has been stuck in my head for years. The idea of matter/energy conversion taking place inside an event horizon; Hawking Radiation being an equivalent to gasses being expelled from the barrel of a gun (particles get sucked in, waste particles grt ejected;
Honestly, I have never heard of cone theory but it makes perfect sense to me, and manages to put actual science terminology, and proven equations, to my wild spacetime theories.
i think a lot of people have that idea bouncing around, it just seems so satisfying. maybe in another life ill be able to do the math to make sense of it.. but not this one!
I literally came to the comments to say this in a less elegant way.
Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
Singularities are dual, positive is dual to negative -- electric charge or numbers, curvature.
White holes are dual to black holes.
Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic (duality).
Points (singularities) are dual to lines -- the principal of duality in geometry.
White holes are negative curvature singularities -- hyperbolic space (divergent).
Convergent (black holes, syntropic) is dual to divergent (white hole, big bang, entropic).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
Fractal physics
You aren't the only one that has thought a white hole is the opposite end of a black hole. I've often wondered if the 'Hawking radiation' of a white hole isn't actually what we call dark matter or dark energy. Since we can't figure out how to make a white hole 'exist' it could also possibly be why we can't figure out dark energy/matter.
The one thing that's always been left out of discussions of white holes-until now-has been any theory of how they might be created. Something we do have for black holes. That always made them seem less connected to reality for me. So thank you for including a proposed mechanism by which they might come into existence.
Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
Singularities are dual, positive is dual to negative -- electric charge or numbers, curvature.
White holes are dual to black holes.
Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic (duality).
Points (singularities) are dual to lines -- the principal of duality in geometry.
White holes are negative curvature singularities -- hyperbolic space (divergent).
Convergent (black holes, syntropic) is dual to divergent (white hole, big bang, entropic).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
The big bang is a Janus point/hole (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour, physicist.
Syntropy is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
@@hyperduality2838 and yet, where is all the antimatter?
@@mediawolf1dude posted this same comment about 15 times throughout this thread. I wouldn’t pay him any mind.
"discussions of white holes-until now" Odd, every 'scientific' discussion of white holes that I have seen has speculated on their origin, and usually says black holes . . . .
White holes are one of what are called "vacuum solutions" to General Relativity. They require the white hole to be empty space in an empty universe and to have always existed eternally forever in the past... for no "reason", spacetime is just curved like that. There's a vacuum black hole with identical requirements, and these two vacuum solutions are the same equation with the time coordinate flipped between positive and negative.
Real, physically existing, black holes don't exist forever in a vacuum, because they form from collapsing supernovae. A real black hole is full of neutrons, and didn't exist some amount of time in the past. (Also probably has angular momentum, and electric charge.) Real black holes are messy.
Fantastic video as always, thank you ❤ Also, thank you for not burying the ad read in the middle, I don’t mind them, but having them as a trailer to the video is always preferable.
My white whole exploded for a week after my trip to Mexico
That’s a brown hole.
Funny cos my black hole did the same after eating at el salvos 😂
Bruh
HA
10/10
Just finished The White Holes by Carlo Rovelli a week ago and now watched this awesome video which expanded on the topic even more and made some things clearer for me! Thank you for making such a great content, been watching Astrum for many years now and subscribed to Patreon today😄
*_White Hole - Spewing Time - Engines Dead - Oxygen Supply Low_*
Given that god is infinite....would you like a toasted teacake?
So What is it?
@@davespages I've never seen one before -- no one has -- but I'm guessing it's
a white hole.
So what is it?
Only joking 😸
Best explanation of Penrose Diagram I've ever heard! Thank you, kind sir!
This dude has the best amicable difference of opinion arguments I've ever seen
Kudos
Dude he is just semi-science literate and gets his "science facts" from skimming over other peoples space facts on science forums and such. Then he figures out some way to create controversy about it, and edits another space video recycling the same old random space footage.
I can promise you... that if science would have confirmed the existance of "white holes", then THIS is not the first place you would have heard about it.
@@captain_context9991 don't you have anything other to do than spread hate comments?
@@divat10
Uh.... Where is the hate? I know a great deal of things on this, and these are not facts.
Have I stepped on your american dream or something?
@@captain_context9991 i am not american but ok.
it may not be the the definition of hate but i have seen 3 comments of yours that is just discrediting the video's without an explanation exept for that this isn't proven jet. astrum is just explaining a theory. some people like theories instead of what we definitively know now.
i understand that may be hard for you to understand but thats just it.
@@captain_context9991Just curious, what kind of work do you do?
So what is it?
I’ve never seen one before - no one has - but I’m guessing it’s a white hole.
@@mr.spatula4833A white hole?
@@mr.spatula4833A white hole??
a person of culture I see.
@@TheWatcherxx99 Every action has an equal and opposite reaction. A black hole sucks time and matter *out* of the universe. A white hole *returns* it.
As a photographer there's a time principal that any object can become "washed out" over too much time. If a black hole was observed over the duration of its existence, the collective Hawking radiation could technically be considered a white hole... when viewed along the "T" axis it would be a continuous emission of information until it is exhausted.
Beautifully done Alex! So glad I sat through the math which you kept accessible. Wormholes and white holes and parallel universes oh my! Yes, more please!
Hello 👋
If only traffic cones could become more difficult to produce and are phased out. I swear they are taking over in my location of space-time
Oh man, unlucky. My area of space time hasn't seen a traffic cone for a while. Though my area of space time is quite small
As long as we insist on cars and roads we insist on construction and traffic cones. More cars, more roads, more cones.
Rail, however, can be fixed without any problem for you, and it lasts damn near forever.
2:40
I love the idea that they are interconnected at a point of singularity. Forming an hourglass shape, which has even greater meaning. Considering that an hourglass is used to measure time. Time that can only flow in one direction. (Sounds similar to our most logical theories currently)
I was told there'd be no math. 😄 This is so far over my head, I am unable to express my ignorance of the subject. I bow to the people who can hold an intelligent discourse of the subject matter. 😵💫
Bill
YES YES YES PLEASE do a video about the big bounce or big contraction!! I’m obsessed with watching videos that touch on that theory!! Maybe you’ve already done it since I’m 3 weeks behind in content, but that’s how excited I’ll be whenever I see you’ve made it!!
I just listened to an hour and 20 minute lecture from Cambridge University Astronomy’s UA-cam channel called “Echoes of the Big Bang - Probing the beginnings of the cosmos” or something very similar. It was absolutely fascinating, though, I admit a bit went over my head. But that’s ok, I think I’m absorbing 85% of the content of that talk.
I don’t have my HS diploma. I’m AuDHD as they call it, or, I have Autism Spectrum Disorder and ADHD. I am a late diagnosed female(just a couple of months ago at 44) and I fell through the cracks in school, and through the healthcare system(though protocols were *much* different when I was a kid), so I made it to half way through junior year because of the anxiety that went with it.
I don’t have any self confidence, though I’ve been told I have a high IQ. I’m scared to take the GED test and get my HS equivalency. I’ve built it up to be this huge thing. It’s gotten in the way to progress for me. Is 85% good, or would I understand more if I had finished the last two semesters of HS?
I often think about what it would be like to go to college and get some kind of space science degree. I’m good at math. I adore science.
Anyway, I love hearing anyone talk about cyclical universe theory/the big contraction/loop quantum theory/the big bounce!! Do eeeeet! 😁😂
As far as I know, when I took my GED, each subject had a total score of 800, and I needed 440 to pass. So long as you can read well, the only subject that could give you trouble would be the math. Refresh on high school math if that's a weak spot for you, and you should be just fine. Most of the other sections, like the science part, provide all the information you need to answer, so long as your reading comprehension is good.
Judging by your writing, you'll be fine! And you can always try it again, if necessary. There might be a wait period for a retest but you wouldn't be banned from trying again.
This is amazing… do more videos like this!!
Alex, let me just tell you that your contribution to bringing science to the masses is of such great importance. Thank you for all you do
Bert
i love you astrum and i love all your videos, they make me see the world so differently
This is a concept that really interests me. For years I've thought about the idea that our universe could be the rememnants of a dead blackhole, or at least a blackhole that has lost enough mass through hawking radiation, that it can no longer sustain itself, releasing all of that potential energy and condensed matter in a a sort of a big bang. To take it a step further, blackholes could be universes in the making and that could explain the nature of parallel universes. It doesn't necessarily mean that a universe would be born within a universe from a white, due to the fact that the curvature of spacetime is so intense inside a black hole, that it could very well be flung into whatever fabric lays outside of our universe. Considering the time dilation, the creation of a new universe's coordinates could even be a point in time in the very far distant future. Awesome video, love this channel.
John
@@EvelynLogan-od7zc Evelyn 😉😅
I think it's good to remember that the "laws of physics" are really just a current best fit model. A human way of conceptualising so that we can make useful predictions, it would be quite grandiose to assume that our models and concepts like mathematics are in fact laws governing the universe. The universe is not really governed by mathematics - the equations we use to model the universe are governed by mathematics, a human construct. When we talk about spacetime being curved or black holes having a particular geometry, we are using mathematical concepts as metaphors to help visualise and reason about the phenomena - this is wonderful for making accurate predictions, but one has to be careful not to reify the metaphor i.e use mathematical extrapolations as evidence. A prediction of an impossible object is probably more likely to be evidence of a flaw in our model, than the existence of the impossible object.
Perhaps white holes are simply the dark matter of other universes. The inverse of the inexorable collapse of the black hole becomes the inexorable expansion of the other. Becoming an infinite string of recursive collapse and expansion...
Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
Singularities are dual, positive is dual to negative -- electric charge or numbers, curvature.
White holes are dual to black holes.
Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic (duality).
Points (singularities) are dual to lines -- the principal of duality in geometry.
White holes are negative curvature singularities -- hyperbolic space (divergent).
Convergent (black holes, syntropic) is dual to divergent (white hole, big bang, entropic).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
The big bang is a Janus point/hole (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour, physicist.
Syntropy is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
@@hyperduality2838dude, how many time your gonna copy and paste this throughout the comments here. Jesus. Calm down.
@@BDB78 people will spend their entire lives trying anything to get their crazy physics fanfic published - except learn math hahaha
Oh YES! More about the big bounce/white hole idea, it sounds like such a relief from all the black hole destruction and universe expansion death ideas.
As fascinating and beautifully presented as always. PLEASE do give us the follow up to this video. I need to watch this one again, stopping to internalise each piece of new information or new idea. There are some really mind-expanding ideas that can be generated.
10:26 this sounds like the end of interstellar without the time travel stuff.
Somehow I always thought that the big bang was a white hole connected to a black hole in a parallel universe. Sounds good to know that my hunch may actually be a real thing.
Black holes, wormholes and white holes were dramatized at the end of the movie Interstellar. Cooper travels through the inner horizon and escapes through a white hole although thats not explicitly stated in the movie. I never bought it but still it's kinda cool !!
Hello 👋
Cat: So what is it?!
I was hoping Dwarfer's were still around, thank you internet
i remember a video from action lab showing how a white hole would act. Kinda explains why spacetime is expanding at an accelerated rate, doesn't it?
White holes are big bangs
Or little bangs
They are medium bangs.
Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
Singularities are dual, positive is dual to negative -- electric charge or numbers, curvature.
White holes are dual to black holes.
Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic (duality).
Points (singularities) are dual to lines -- the principal of duality in geometry.
White holes are negative curvature singularities -- hyperbolic space (divergent).
Convergent (black holes, syntropic) is dual to divergent (white hole, big bang, entropic).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
The big bang is a Janus point/hole (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour, physicist.
Syntropy is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
Okay... so... right about 6:44 the statement is made that, essentially light from region 1 (our universe) cannot travel to region 3 (a parallel universe), but...
If light goes into a black hole... and eventually spills outwards through a white hole - LONG time though it may be... isn't the light travelling between regions. (And, as I understand it, light doesn't "experience" time so...)
Therefore, can't light just sort of burrow serpentine through the universes?
Joseph
The first time I saw a white hole exploding I was in my teens.
Time slowed down for me at that moment.
Gravity seemed heavier just after.
For sure it was an event horizon.
glad you did a vid on this. me and a friend wrote a paper on this subject a few years ago and its neat to see this idea getting around
The paper focused more on the nature of the black holes interiors and logically refuted that relativity and conservation of energy would still exist within the event horizon.
but what was really interesting was that the idea was later tested in a simulation. and it was found that relativity could work with a theoretical threshold.
if the threshold was reached. it would reset. creating a pocket of spacetime that would expand faster then the speed of light so nothing can reach the edge.
relative expansion and contraction of space occurs naturally with time dilation, what we see as the size of the black hole means nothing to how big the interior can be.
the most interesting thing about this was the interior of this simulated black hole, ended up looking alot like what we thought the universe would look like at the big bang, where time bearly existed and thousand of lightyears of volume were created in what to us looked like a 10th of a second. which leads to a interesting and scary idea.
what if our big bang was just another universes black hole, and were still in it.
Your final thought is what I believe the cosmological event horizon is. I think the "observable" universe is just that; the interior of a large black hole.
I wonder what other holes there are on the chromatic spectrum.
The quest to find the elusive brown holes continues!
I wonder if a Uranus is a type of hole
I know of a pink hole, would you like to see it? It may have a little brown on it, as well
While that is definitely funny, there are no white holes.
@@RADFROOD25prolapsar? sorry ;)
Plenty of assholes out there!
This video is wonderful! Please do another video continuing with this concept of black holes creating white holes that create universes!😊
These concepts not only fill me with awe and wonder but also extreme existential terror
I figure the Pauli exclusion principal would prevent the singularity being a point. It's still small, but not zero.
I don’t know why but the idea of the white holes excites me to my core! And the fact that Big Bang could’ve potentially been a white hole just gives me chills. This video is everything i ever needed so now i can show my friends why this topic has so much of my interest😁 Would love to see more!
Hey I really like your profile picture and if you let me, I would make such an amazing mural out of it! If you don’t mind one of your post could be my inspiring muse for an art project i’m working on for a client. You will totally get paid for it as well as a bonus also get credits.
this is so perfect to watch for advanced space docu watchers like me xD i love these real ideas so much to daydream about.
I was introduced to white holes through Diane Duane's "So You Want to be a Wizard". Fred was a g 😔✊
I like the idea that it’s possible that information arranges itself in a specific way in black holes. So in the event that the universe all ends up in 1 black hole right before it ends the black hole will explode into a white hole with all info arranged in the same way it was last time.
So with no factorial differences in the event, it will play out the exact same. The universe will loop😂
What if in theory, if a singularity reached a determined critical point, it could become heavy enough to turn the fabric of space inside out, or permeates it, which could be a white hole with the black hole information. That point being the "big bang" if you would. So the information isn't escaping from the black hole, it's simply following the singularity across that barrier.
Gotta feel good knowing you inspired a 15m+ YT channel to expound on this idea with actual animations of what it would look like for the observer to fall into a spinning black hole 🤘🏻
I liked the other guys comment, as well as my own.
I liked your comment.
That's the beauty of Quantum Mechanics!
I've been wanting to buy a box of Hostess Ho-Ho's to pass out to ... Who knows, what could possibly go wrong?
John
I liked my own comment
Gooooooooooood goooooood let the hate take control
Your comment is what a comment should be pure and simple
*If this isn’t pinned I will unsubscribe!!!*
I liked your comment and mine
I liked my own comment and all of your comments.
Great channel. Even a dummy like me who struggled with calculus can grasp most of it.
the music at around 6.00 reminds me of the track by Vapourspace - Gravitational Arch Of Ten (1993)
Hello 👋
This is a fascinating subject, well presented and beautifully explained, as usual.
It's highly likely that the physics us mere humans have concocted, in the very short time we've existed, to explain what we see around us is entirely wrong. And it's also likely that the parts we have correct are dismally incomplete. But that's what's so exciting about it all...since nobody can profess to know the answer to anything, there's always space for conjecture. And, in that, our understanding can evolve, much as we ourselves have evolved.
Keep it up Alex - you are doing a sterling job indeed 👍
Tod
This video made me think of that Tim & Eric sketch about The Universe, with all the diagrams and cones
You made my day when you talked about the big bounce. I had that idea before but never heard it before from anyone else. Also, it feels good to give it a name. Sadly if our universe is expanding, that means the other is compacting. RIP our sister universe.
is it possible that a "white hole" is actually the quantum effect that fills the space in the universe created by expansion?
Great Video, Alex. A real brainbender.
Maybe there could be a point where a black hole swallows so much that its gravitational pull breaks and its infinitely compacted energy and matter instantly explodes back out into space. Imagine how energetic that would be. Would it be able to destroy a universe as it created a new one?
I never considered an explanation like this to the quantum paradox. I figured it was one of those things humanity was unable to process correctly. Or it may, might be this explanation. I have often thought this material could seed spacetime without detonation, being not especially in contact with normal matter. Thinking of antimatter somehow places it in Saudi-Arabia, but that would just be my internal gears missing a shift.
OHMYGOD more of this yes please!
The diagram didn't help my brain comprehend it even a little 😂
To put it simply, black holes lead through wormholes to an extra dimensional mantle. Everything that enters, even light, is black or invisible.
The mantle recycles and distributes the energy and particles that reach it.
The energy and particles are then sent through quantum wormholes back into 4D space. Virtual particles is an example.
Love to hear more about the Big Bounce
...Time to make a game about falling into a spinning black hole, and then entering the ring of universe travel!
Alexander
So curious! I kept posting on UA-cam videos in 2011 & 2012 about how I thought it made more sense that black holes would eventually rebound into white holes. I wonder when the new theory was introduced.
Time travel is not paradoxical in Many Worlds. Wormholes imply many worlds.
Crazy to think we can even theorize about reality being an infinite corridor of nested universes attached by singularity patchwork.
Knowing how long various celestials persist, and the ultimate fate of our own observable universe, it sure would be gnarly to try and tame the black hole to carry on surviving after a home universe had been exhausted. If it would ever be remotely possible to overcome the physics of it. It'd be like the final boss of the universe. Either you unlock level 2 or your species and legacy perish with your stars.
I know its all vast time scales but ive always felt that the universe only being 14 billion years old always felt kinda. . . short. So the idea that the universe is a whitehole from an older sounds interesting.
Hello 👋
These videos help my outerwilds play through xD
Wormholes are basically the backrooms
I KNEW there was a reason why OREO’s were so good.
My mouth is the Event Horizon & my belly…the singularity
10:50 it doesn't lead to causal paradox's if time forms a full geodesic loop rather than going back on the timeline
It does because if you would kill yourself in the past you won't exist in the future, but you are in the future which means you did not kill yourself in the past
I like the Big Bounce idea. Let's hear more!
The thing about singularity, it's not really a physical thing, but rather an event in the future (for black hole) that you can't escape, and for white hole it's an event in the past that you can't return to.
If you look at it that way, then the bing bang being caused by a white hole makes perfect sense. Therefore a black hole from a parallel universe can create an entire new universe with a white whole.
Can’t wait for pink&blue holes!
Of course we want to hear more.
Hey I really like your profile picture and if you let me, I would make such an amazing mural out of it! If you don’t mind one of your post could be my inspiring muse for an art project i’m working on for a client. You will totally get paid for it as well as a bonus also get credits.
The white hole Big Bounce makes so much sense to me.
I have a simple question that I consider fundamental: I throw a proton into a black hole. How is the proton spaghettified? What happens to the quarks that constitute the proton? What happens to the proton as it reaches the singularity?
When a black hole collides with a white hole, you might get a gray hole!
Positive curvature is dual to negative curvature -- Gauss, Riemann geometry.
Singularities are dual, positive is dual to negative -- electric charge or numbers, curvature.
White holes are dual to black holes.
Topological holes cannot be shrunk down to zero -- non null homotopic (duality).
Points (singularities) are dual to lines -- the principal of duality in geometry.
White holes are negative curvature singularities -- hyperbolic space (divergent).
Convergent (black holes, syntropic) is dual to divergent (white hole, big bang, entropic).
"Always two there are" -- Yoda.
Energy is dual to mass -- Einstein.
Dark energy is dual to dark matter.
The big bang is a Janus point/hole (two faces = duality) -- Julian Barbour, physicist.
Syntropy is dual to increasing entropy -- the 4th law of thermodynamics!
This is the key along with light having non zero mass that will lead to a unified theory of everything. It will also explain 'spooky action at a distance '.
Black holes do not spontaneously form from nothing. They grow as mass falls toward the constellation's center. This mass certainly warps space-time before the collapse; but, the event horizon doesn't form the 45 degree warp until the collapse does form the event horizon. Thus, the event horizon cusp should instead be a continuous, smooth curve.
Please follow up with a deeper dive on the singularity... I always thought it was the same as the event horizon, now I'm confused
I have personally been pondering this theory for about a year now and also believe it ties in to the torioidal universe theory. A singularity is infinitely in the future, therefore its opposite of a white hole which is infinitely in the past, and the big bang itself being argued as the creation of our universe (in my opinion one of the many times it has been created) what could be more infinitely in the past?
A problem with black hole evaporation is that if it can ever occur, it will be a very very long time into the future - when it is the only thing existing (pretty much).
only a matter of time and that there's a hole lot of. from now and until the last black hole disappear and then time will continue without no-one or anything forever. so no matter what ever happens we are all so fucked no matter how hard we try to figure out how we can outsmart the universe and time with all these ideas that will never matter against time. would probably be pretty epic to see the very end off all things🤣
This channel is underrated
It would be easier to describe it as one of two surfaces of a sphere, of the length changing from interior to the exterior
a black hole bends and distorts space time around it with it´s mass, so would it - at least theoritically - be possible for it to become so massive that it bends and thwists space time completely around itself, closing itself off of the rest of the universe, creating it´s own little bubble.
16:06 yes please!
The bounce is interesting, but does that mean at some point time would reverse or is time an illusion.
If we view the entropy field Ŝ(x,t) not as an explosive expansion from a point singularity, but rather as an oscillating or cyclical phenomenon, we could modify the field equation to potentially have oscillatory solutions.
One way would be to add a driving term to the wave equation, perhaps coming from the curvature coupling ξR:
(☐ + m2 + ξR)Ŝ(x,t) = j(t)
Where j(t) represents some time-dependent driving "force" that could induce oscillatory behavior in the entropy field evolution.
We could explore different possible forms for j(t), such as:
j(t) = A cos(ωt)
- Simple harmonic oscillator
j(t) = B sech(t)
- Cyclical "breather" type solution
j(t) = C cos(ωt) + D sin(ωt)
- Superposition of oscillating modes
Depending on the specific form chosen, we could get oscillating entropy field solutions that undergo periodic expansions and contractions, rather than a single irreversible blast outwards.
I think about white holes far more then I should, thank you for making me feel normal. I thought I was the only one.
Either your actually picking were the ads go or youtube is just that good
Maybe they do stack on top of one another, and different black holes that form within a single universe lead to different branches of different sub-universes by asymptotic means, and so on and so forth. All infinite in scale for the observer within them, but a logarithmically smaller infinity than the one that hosts it. Maybe the singularity sucks up mass/energy to a critical point at which the white hole inside of it gives birth to a new universe instantaneously, and because the singularity doesn't experience time, it doesn't matter the trillions of years relative to our observation that it would take for it to reach that point.
Austin
_"What actually transpires beneath the veil of an event horizon? Decent people shouldn't think too much about that."_
It makes sense. If a black hole absorbs and a white hole releases then the big bang could be the result of a white hole releasing.
Yes please on the big bounce video!!! This is exactly what I think the big bang was. Just makes sense. Thanks for these videos. Seriously!
I went to college with a guy who was around during the Big Bang. He said it was exactly how White Holes are described, so I think this theory may be correct.
I remember first hearing about a White Hole in “So You Want to Be a Wizard”.
His name was Fred and he was so so brave
yes the other side of the black hole is an expansion where in the table of elements is re written
about the last point, would our universe be parallel to the one that collapsed in on itself (in a future time)? rather than the same universe?
Great to see this finally talked about. Back in the early 2000s, Big Bang seemed like an odd place to claim the beginning.
A more convenient explanation would involve a theory of elements/matter, and its origin and dispersal through a quantum foam of parallel universes. As areas of high pressure can breach into a lower pressure, this would naturally occur as mass came together through gravity and collapsed into a singularity.
In one universe, an area of high pressure would be the blackhole, in the nearby (low pressure) universe, an area of dense material where stars form would be the inverse of this cone.
If the conditions in these universes had led to different elements forming, then the earliest interactions with black and white holes would have involved basic elements. But as more volitale reactive elements get into the mix, perhaps backflow to previous universe becomes possible.
If such an origin were possible, the big bang would be way, way down the line of mixed elements.
Bro just explained rick and morty in 18 minutes
What if the white holes are the dark energy? That expands the universe?
There is no white hole. The flip side is yet another black hole, except this one has time spun in reverse. So on the flip side of the black hole, time flows in the opposite direction to ours. Think of the singularity as not being a physical passage, but a transversal of time itself. So now the flip side of our black hole is pushing matter instead of pulling on it. Wild stuff. But this could explain the holographic nature of our universe, in that nothing actually really exists.
Yes, please, a video about the big bounce would be great.
Forget parallel universes. Forget wormholes.
I'm more interested in the inverse information paradox presented by a white hole. If a black hole destroys information by making quantum entropy irreversible, what then does that mean for a white hole? What IS that "information" that they would eject and how would they even evaporate if they have no hawking radiation?
Edit: this was only briefly brushed over at the end of the video! Aaa this should have been the main subject of the vid! It still leaves so many questions unresolved!
Make a video about the big bounce please :)
Hello 👋