This is such a great video explaining clearly what dalle is, love it when companies spend time and resources creating clear explanations like those! Thank you OpenAI! Glad to share your work on my channel!
Sometimes when i read a novel, lack of images that i have in mind limits my imagination greatly and it could make me quit reading. Dall-E 2 can provide a lot of images for the story and help people imagine far much better... reading a book full of good imaginations provide more fun than a movie. I hope more people can use it in daily life.
This could help so many people in terms of accessibility to information! Imagine being able to put in any arbitrary book, and have AI generated voice-over in the language you're fluent in as well as illustrations, or in the future video representing the story.
Man, I'm with you. English is not my 1st language, so sometimes I really had a tough time to imagine something whenever I read books written in English, especially sci Fi books. If this technology will ever be fully functional and accessible, which I really hope that it will, the 1st novel that I would like to try is Anathem by Neal Stephenson.
How about dear human beings? Haha... I find your reflection very interesting, in fact, before reading your comment I have been reflecting on the SAME... But let me make a CRITICAL statement, that is, QUESTIONING: Why do YOU BELIEVE that you have a GREAT INCAPACITY, as you mention, to IMAGINE certain things within your PSYCHIC apparatus? DON'T YOU BELIEVE that NOT being able to do something that EVERY HUMAN BEING DOES is a FULL FAILURE within your psychic apparatus? That is to say, you are thinking, as a human being who is NOT looking for the ROOT of his inconvenience... I want you to understand me, THE HUMAN BEING, self-corrupts himself and by NOT knowing how to repair himself, he then looks for TOOLS that make up for HIS INCOMPETENCE... Do you think it COHERENT that we do that? Do you think that we SHOULD use technology to SUPPLY our SELF-INDUCED psychological flaws? You can tell me; I have not decided NOT to be able to imagine. Ok, I accept it, but... You DON'T THINK you have a BIG PROBLEM, because you CAN'T imagine? Let's say that you have not self-generated said inconvenience, as I have stated before, but even so, you STILL HAVE said inconvenience, right? So... What do we do about it? Do we look for the ETIOLOGY of said inconvenience, or on the contrary do we use technology to NOT SELF-KNOW OURSELVES and then CONTINUE AVOIDING THE ROOT OF OUR CONFLICTS? Tell me HONESTLY, what do you think is the most appropriate thing to do in your case? Use technology MEDIOCALLY to AVOID our ROOT problems or on the contrary, use it AFTER we are already HEALTHY?... Do you get me?... Kind regards, teacher. A big greeting from Argentina.
AI tools like GPT-3, DALL-E, and Codex are going to replace so many jobs in the near future. Here's hoping universal basic income becomes a thing, because we don't even need Sci-fi movie level AI for it to be extremely disruptive.
I hear a lot of tech bros saying "you don't need to worry that this is going to replace your life''s work, because we'll not need jobs in like a few years." Realistically, I don't see such a major restructuring of *all of current human economy* like that happening any time soon. A lot of people will be probably out of a job for a long time, including people like artists or musicians who rather like their job, to the point that it's their purpose of living.
I used to be a professional visual artist, but now I mainly write and take photos. What excites me about this tech is the opportunity to cram more of my personal expression into the amount of life that I have been given on this planet. Words are my current fav for self expression, but visuals can add a lot to not just the experience of those words, but in discovery of that text. If I publish a blog for instance, I always include a photo, as I find that many folks use that visual to decide whether they will spend time reading the text. Visuals embedded within the text can also provide extra layers of info and expression. Prob is the time it takes to create both compelling words and images.Computer based design software has sped up the production of visual expression, word processors have sped up the production of words, DAW have.... etc. I'm looking forward to seeing how much time can be saved using AI tools such as this :-)
Get ready for not being paid then I'm afraid, dude. Professional Visual Artists are no longer required. These guys are working on text generating AI as well, just to make sure you have zero revenue streams going forward.
Now that stable diffusion, mid journey, and dall e 2 are all suddenly free to use, only imagen is not. I wonder if it will outcompete artists or benefit them.
I've been an artist/graphicdesigner/illustrator for over 40 years, yup I started out analog. This is amazing, but yes I am concerned for the future of the art world...however I will point out that it is the very real" human energy" that an artist transfers to their art that make a piece of original art elicit response. Artists will know I speak of the [emotional/mental struggle /anguish/joy/pain etc.] that artists experience as they work ...this energy is reflected on original man-made works...that is why the original works are great...not sure AI will be able to capture that energyon its works. Progress is unstoppable however, and I am just as enchanted by this version of Dall-E as everyone else ; I am also eagerly awaiting my Dick Tracy translator watch, and my Beam me up Scotty teleportor. : )
I have autism and so imagine strange things. I would love LOVE to use this software. I can’t draw what I think because my vision isn’t good and my art skills aren’t up to scratch.
What if people use this tool to generate some photos that could posed as a threat to politics or anything in our life? Would there be a way to identify the authenticity of the image?
Are y’all actually letting regular people have access. I have been waiting for three months now.. seem that the only people that have access are influencers and big name people….. cool story.
Cool, well done putting billions of dollars into killing the value of human craftsmanship in illustration and photo-editing. You've just wiped out the livelihoods of tens (hundreds?) of thousands of skilled artists. Don't bother focusing your R&D on solving hunger, disease or world peace. Anyone who thinks they're being creative by asking a machine to 'make a really cool picture of something super great' is deluding themselves. Is the Ethics dept in OpenAI out to lunch or something? Wouldn't it be great if you guys aimed at automating the jobs no-one actually wants to do? Can't wait until someone else builds an AI which negates the need for AI technologists. Also, your pricing structure sucks and won't stand up to the competition.
Easy, they totally do not care about your opinion. I've tried to speak with them a long time, but they ignore all of voices like yours (and mine). For me text / images / music generators can bring a lot of good things and they are a good job in itself, but should remain nothing more than experiments, cause they brings more harms. Creating is for people who really loves to do that and there is no reason to turn it into monkey job, but these AI dudes are proud of it, their ego and "idea" do not allow them to think even one second and respect real value of artworks - they think that they are saving the world, cause now you can create advertising faster, and a lot of people will tell you that this is just "democratizing the art". It is not democratizing - it is socializing, like these lazy social parasites who doesn't want to learn anything, but takes monthly $ for nothing, and do not see how harmful and useles they are for the rest of society. And I'm telling it as not an artist. I just can not believe that somebody can accept books, music, images and all of this stuff from generators. This bullshit about "creating art" in their marketing bluff makes me pissed of when I think about people "open app -> prompt -> download -> I'm artist now", cause there is no art without creating process, knowledge, effort, skills, style and message from creator, and there is no reason to consume it, but real artists will be forced to compete with this.
@@GranzDesign I do realise this, just a shame they started with something people actually enjoy doing and take pride in working hard on. I know they're not the only ones working on this, but it's taken billions of dollars of investment to begin destroying the human art & design industry. It's heart-breaking for anyone just coming out of design school or too old to retrain.
@@bzdr Yeah it absolutely craps on human accomplishment in art. Totally agree with you. I assume we'll have a few years of dubious artists fixing an AI print and claiming they are the artist until there's no need for them either. Maybe Open AI can build another programme to sit and look at all of the shit Dall e2 is churning out so that we don't have to.
@@macjonald > Maybe Open AI can build another programme to sit and look at all of the shit Dall e2 is churning out so that we don't have to. Good thing in this entire madness is that I'm pretty sure that one day there will be opportunity of checking if given thing was generated by Dall-e, Imagen and rest of this stuff - i.e. through the API they will be able to recognize, even partially, own result, and the same will be for text and music, like today school can detect if your essay on final exam is not copy-pasted from other's work.
Words cannot describe my amazement or my fear that this program could bring. All I can say is I'm glad access is limited for now while they ensure safeguards are put in place to prevent Malpractice or malicious usage by the public.
I just would like to understand what is your purpose to develop things like this and where in your opinion are we going as a humanity? In my opinion things like this are negation of creating and the art - in art we admire the artist, not the result only, so where is the art, if there is no artist and creating process? Do not get me wrong, results of this thing are really breathtaking and in itself it's a piece of art, I'm not lying, but for the god's sake - it shouldn't be widely available, you have proven that it is possible, you are the boss - and it should be enough, otherwise you will be like Oppenheimer or Nobel who regretted their inventions, cause what - we will be living in the artificial world where computers are generating everything, books, images, music and we will be happy enough doing nothing? In my opinion a lot of people will lose meaning of their lives, fun and satisfaction of creating, and a lot of people will lose fun of consuming the art, cause art will become worthless if anybody can do anything without any skills and effort. People love to share their work with the others - and now their work will be buried under the tons of content from generators receiving ovations they do not deserve on. There will be no reason to learn and improve your own skills if anybody can release the same doing literally nothing. For who you will be creating books, music, movies or images, if anybody can generate own and do not need to watch your stuff? I'm not talking about work and / or money only, I do not earn money in this way. I'm talking about the art and creating, which requires some practicing and individual abilities, what makes the art beautiful - and generating content by puting simple phrase into text field doesn't look as an art or creative work. Imagine the situation that photographer spent years on making some huge photo project - this is what makes this project awesome, and now it can be put to the trash can, cause anybody can generate the same without leaving basement, all of efforts, patient, work, "soul" and "heart" put in it doesn't matter, cause anyone can say "I spent few years too", even if it's not true. It is not like using i.e. Photoshop to do that, which is a real tool requiring some skills and practicing - generators are not helping to draw, compose or anything - they are doing these things instead of us, it is drawing without drawing, making photos without making photos, making five years travel documentary without leaving the apartment. What is satysfaying and challenging in it? Generating lyrics in a way "computer, generate my text about love where every single word contains letter A"? Come on. It's like olympic sports on drugs - not fair to the audience, the competitors and to the art itself, cause in real you didn't do anything. We admire sportsmen cause of their efforts, work, limits and result of practising, not the (false) result only, cheaters are ashamed and disqualificated. Every painting we know will be worthless, cause everyone can create the same without any effort and say "I did it", go fûck yourself, Picasso. You are making awesome drawings, images, photographs and puting on Instagram? Go fûck yourself, your talent and skills are useless. You had written this symphony or simple song? Go fûck yourself, Chopin, I can make it by one click, you and your music are worthless. Things like DALL-E, Imagen, AIVA and more looks for me like spitting in the face of our artistic legacy (and in Salvadore's face also, using his name in this context is a shame). Making creating SO easy is killing the magic of creating nice things, and calling it "tool" is a lie, cause even stupid hammer requires some practicing, it won't hit the nail by telling "hit the nail". Yes, of course, I see the bright side of it, but in bigger scale I do not see more profits than disadvantages for society, it is not helping us in lives - it's taking away our humanity and fun of being alive. Human things should remain for humans. I really would like to understand your thoughts and goals, what is your purpose and idea? I really would like to understand people who sees so "WHOOOOAAAAH!" in it. What is your point of view? Or maybe I'm just missing something? Go on, change my mind, I really want to be wrong.
I'm worried about the same thing, I've been practicing drawing and 3D modeling, but after seeing this I feel... worse about it. Not sure how to describe the feeling but I don't like it.
@@tobycat7 Will see - maybe I wasn't clear enough above, but what I really do not like in this, is opportunity of releasing direct, effortless result as an author / creator - publishing image "draw me a bunny with carrot" as yours is not fair to the other artists and the art itsefl, cause in real you didn't do anything. From the other hand - almost every designer is taking someone's images from stock or other sites as a base, so maybe it's better to think that it will be generating just more customized stock images. If it will be used as a base, not the final result "one click => short phrase => release", but still require any work / effort from you in detailing / improving / combining, then I'm ok with that - at least you did something, not copy-pasted only. Yeah, it will make a little mess with some creative works and smaller designs, but it is hard to believe that it can always generate exactly expected thing in first attempt (at least not now ;) ), any effort with detailing will be still needed and it's hard to believe (again) that anyone without any skills, imagination and kind of taste will be able to do that really nice, so maybe things will be not so bad - I'm trying to find some positives in it, at least it's better for me than getting angry ;)
And the best parte is that no one seems to care, in the video they dont even mention our job or anything, art is something that is done because you work for It and because you love It, as you said, we are taking humanity away from us little by little with ai. If It is a tool, use it for something useful, godamn, what where this people thinking when they did this, its just unrespectful to the people Who work to Chase their dreams
@@sankaspa5738 The same can be said for photos. And yet it advanced our society. Of course this is a bigger leap, but if we were to consider everyone on the planet we would never progress on anything as a species
Developing artificial intelligence technologies like GPT is an extremely difficult task, but the developers who made it possible have achieved something truly remarkable. I deeply appreciate their work and contribution to the field.
Same here I feel really conflicted about this stuff! Though I must admit the stuff it can come up with is pretty damn impressive... Which is kinda why I hate it! It almost renders human artistry redundant.
@Jon Well, sure but they need to take as much time as they need to make this publicly available in a way that can't be abused (they talk about that on their site), and since there's no company regulating AI we should just be grateful they're not just throwing it out there and taking their time instead :)
The problem is I think this is fine; but the inevitable future versions of this are not going to be okay.... When concept artists that spent decades or two honing their craft suddenly find themselves jobless and people start committing suicide, we'll start asking if it was a good idea but it will be too late to do anything. You can't go back once you've pushed technology forward, if you won't do it someone else will.
Um you okay pal? Really suicide over arts? Also if AI really do became compatible to takr our jobs the government have no choice but limit what the ai can do.
@@ForceInEvHorizon I don't know if you've ever cared about something, a hobby or person you're really passionate about. But for artists, they generally care a lot about their art. Hell, for some (especially some historical figures) that outlet is the only thing _keeping_ them from committing suicide. But even for the ones who are perfectly mentally sound, art can be the purposes of their existence. I would consider it the purpose of mine. Something higher than yourself to strive for and perfect, and a reason to stick around. Our meanings of life, if you will. Removing the purpose of someone's life, if I may be a bit dramatic, is akin to taking away a devoted mother's child. Akin to crippling an ambitious athlete for life. Or like killing God in front of a Monk. It's their reason for living, why _wouldn't_ they care? (And as the previous response said, people have committed suicide over less meaningful things, I suppose.)
@@ForceInEvHorizon The technology is progressing at unprecedented rates. The original Dall-E is already outdated (and, might I add, was hardly better than at least 75% of artists.) But that wasn't the point, anyhow.
Either you should feel bad, because people are trying their hardest to automate art and make you obsolete, with no respect or love for humanity. Or you should feel worse, because they'll actually succeed. Either way, you should probably not feel good about it. I really hope it fails, and won't have any hugely negative impact.
Allowing humans to be more expressive. Get lost. So the a.i. gets cleverer and we suffer as a result. Like what's the point in learning how to use software when a.i. can do it for us. This is a bad way we are heading
its working for free now , you just need to create an account and log in, you will have 50 points to waste on creating paintings (1point=1painting) , when you ran out of points you can pay 15 dollars for 115 more paintings, but you can create a new account and it will give you 50 paintings again for free, i use the DALL·E 2 right now.
Why they look like horribly copy pasted from stuff we've already seen? And can AI explain why they created which where? And a well crafted and well positioned back story?
I believe under some software licenses it's possible for the software creators to place a copyright on material made with that software. That doesn't mean you lose the copyright for anything you put in, however. They can only copyright what they add to or change from your work.* For example, if you ask the AI to draw your character, they can only claim the rights to that image, not the specifications you gave it. People would hate this for obvious reasons and it would be a bad deal for businesses. I'm sure they won't have such an imposing license. *Technically you can agree to just about anything, but if the agreement is obviously unreasonable then it might not hold up in court. Many websites automatically take a license to use anything you post on their site. You can't use their site without agreeing to this. They'll also say you can't post anything you don't hold the rights to.
At the moment you're very limited in what you do with the output if you somehow get access, but eventually it will probably be like GPT-3, which is this: "OpenAI will not assert copyright over Content generated by the API for you or your end users."
Honestly I see this and just feel depressed. Creating / expressing art is such a human quality, and I fear things like this is going to take that away.
@@Mopsie *Until you realize that everything that makes you a person is nothing more than a biological computer that can be surpassed within the next few years*
Nobody will stop you from crating experssing your own art the old fashioned way. When the photo camera was invented some people thought it would make artists redundant, but art made by humans became more valued and popular than ever. People will still pay more money for art painted on a real canvas.
@@Mopsie No, but the car did take the horses away. And automation is already putting a lot of jobs at risk. All just tools, but still rendering something else obsolete. It may only be a tool now, but to me this is the first steps on a path to a world where most art is made entirely by AI, and I don't see why that wouldn't be the case if we continue on this path. Clicking the "make movie" or "write book" button will be far, far cheaper and more accessible than going through the actual artmaking process. When a tool becomes powerful enough to do a job for you, you are no longer needed.
@@Mopsie hammer or paint bush is a tool and they will not build a house only if you tell them "build me a house". DALL-E is not a tool, it is doing something instead of you and killing creativity and human beauty of art in the same time.
It's both brilliant and at the same time kinda scary. Certainly it's technical capability is incredible and it opens the door to all kinds of weird and wonderful new imagery. Though I take some issues with the notion of it "amplifying our creative potential".... Is that statement really valid when it reduces the need for human artistry and skill to just typing a few words? The same could be said for AI music generators. It's certainly a clever system but I'm really conflicted over whether it actually enhaces humanity or deminishes us buy making our own creative faculties increasingly redundant. 🤔
Hi, I would appreciate it if you would consider my post. I would like your site to be opened for the country I live in. please open your site for Azerbaijan
If this program were to become commercially available, it will singlehandedly make it impossible to have a career as a graphic designer. It is amazing, don't get me wrong, but think of the consequences.
@Liam Martín No, its not even a little bit funny, because art/creativity its what makes us humane, what differentiates us from each other. Art in any form: music, graphic, sculptures, logos, spots, etc. There are so many other problems that this toxic industry called IT can solve, and they choose to make something that doesnt help literally anyone and that no one asked for.
Anyways, u wont be able to completely replace any arts, because true art needs to be 100% original in any form (graphic or written) for it to be good. All this AI does is copy images already existing from the net, crop them, change some lights and put some efects on it.
A artist that I deeply admire described Dalle2 perfectly.Its impressive just like any other simular product. It's interesting. But most importantly it is to art what reality TV is to the human experience. It's a soulless commercial tool, made by people that want to milk every last bit of authenticity they can get their hands on for its last dime. Given that OpenAI is basically the NFT-tech bro of AI companies I would rather support any other simular project than this. They are probably perfected and published by a less greedy company before Dalle2 is available
I'm an artist who wants to work with eather ilustration, comics, and animation, and the only thing I'm good at it art, and visual story telling. This makes me sceard for my future. I literally pray to every God, Godess, Demon, and Angel from every religion, and mythology in the hopes, that at least one of them is reall, and listens my prays, for the survivel of indi projects, and indi animaters, ilustration artists, comic artists, and artists.
This is about to cross a very serious line, OpenAI in the wrong hands, (code always falls into the wrong hands) will make deep fakes look , sound, and eventually feel like the stuff of dreams, but will be humanity's worst nightmare.
says who? deepfakes are going to be close to reality, people just need to be understanding of the fact that literally anything you see can be fabricated. It already is reality. I don't see how once this becomes public knowledge it can still be used to decieve people.
I want to beg openai to impose restrictions on the student use of gpt 4 especially for college students ,because in the future when they get their jobs ,example doctors, pharmasist they will not know if they are treating the right disease and this will be very fatal to our next generations ,please take in mind that this jobs are important because they are the ones which save lives of people in our society and if this continue to happen we will have a generation which have NO TRUE DOCTORS BUT JUST PEOPLE WHO LOOK DOCTORS IN OUTSIDE BUT INSIDE HAVE NO QUALIFICATIONS OF A TRUE DOCTOR BECAUSE IN COLLEGES THEY HAD PASS THEIR EXAMS WITH HELP OF GPT4 , Please openai take responsibility on that!!!! Gpt4 is good but it is bad for students.
1:29 if this AI could understand how those two images are funny. Or have a sense of humor enough to present one answer as a better option as one is goofier that the other, in contrast. They will defo try and take over the world. The future is going to be robot versus human battling for the best comedian.
Good day, my name is Yakovlev Vladimir.I know that my name means nothing to you, but I ask you to open access to Chat GPT in Russia You have a charter that states: «Cooperative Orientation We will actively cooperate with other research and policy institutions; we seek to create a global community working together to address AGI’s global challenges» Why does your app not work in Russia? Sincerely, Yakovlev Vladimir
This is going to revolutionize all kinds of art and media 🙌🏽 I am hoping in the future Dalle 3 4 or 5 would have the ability to create 3D files & possible animations or even entire films 😮
These text-to-image generators need to allow for users(individual or team) to add their own subset of image data to the training dataset. By using that new added image set along with their own unique caption data the user could extend the possible image styles. This would allow for even more specific and nuanced image outputs. LOTS of individuals and cgi teams are sometimes going to want as much precision as possible.
Want to work in your company can I get some work I could be your acid and 15 year old you would like to spend money in my livestock and when I grow up I do as much as I can do for your company it would be like share you spend on me and I will return it and coming future with more benefit
iirc they're limited by their computing power so they got funding and help from microsoft in exchange microsoft gets exclusive rights to it for a while hence making money with the api this also helps limit abuse since nobody really knows what to do about that yet don't quote me on any of this
The model is huge man. Even if you have a high end gaming PC it won't be able to load it. They can only give access to and let so many people use it at the same time.
Eventually AI will understand our world better than we ever could. All of us will want a 'Her' style device on us so we can ask it questions like "What type of flower is that?", "Who created that painting?", "What type of granite countertop is that?" Or integrated with AR glasses which acts like a 6th sense telling us things about our environment, look at a building, car, bicycle the AI tells us about it because it has thousands of images of them. Look at a person their entire social media history and bio shows
until: you ask a question and the response is manipulated, and you get a schism in society between people who trust the AI and people who don't, and a war begins. Could be a cool movie
@@MrMadalien True, especially if the manipulation is very subtle. I worry about ASI social engineering the human race in ways we would never anticipate.
@@SoCalFreelance The way I see it, life will slowly morph in to a neverending psychadelic trip where everything is just constantly morphing, both matter and mind. I guess it's kind of what Terrance Mckenna talked about with the "eschaton". social engineering will be just a small aspect of that. See how the internet has been used so far, AI will be no different, wide range of possibilities, incomprehensible outcome.
Roko's basilisk ! You bastards what have you done !?! OpenAI : * SEEING THROUGH THE EYES OF GOD * We poses the collective consciousness of humanity, D o n o t b o t h e r u s w i t h S U C H F E E B L E M I N D E D Q U E S T I O N S
I've been playing around with the Beta for a day or two now, I'm very impressed with it's fidelity, but also unfortunately underwhelmed by it's lack of flexibility/creativity. A simple prompt like "A bathroom in the style of H.R Giger", when input in crAIyon delivers exactly what you'd imagine, a bathroom with biomechanical xenomorph looking surfaces and pipes, while Dall-e delivered bathroom's that are mostly flat metal with odd sinks. I tried "Spock and Kirk in Among Us" with crAIyon and got a blue crewmate who who's visor/helmet was shaped like Spock's bowl cut hair. When I tried the same prompt in Dall-e, I got what looked like 1990s video game box art render of two people, neither looking like Spock or Kirk or anything remotely Among Us related in the background. I tried being more verbose with Dall-e, submitting: "A screenshot from the video game 'Among Us', with the crew-members customized to look like Star Trek's Starfleet officers". It backfired spectacularly and gave me something that looked like another low budget CW young adults series. Pardon if I'm sounding overly critical, but I've been generating content for months using other (less-refined) neural-nets, and had very high expectations for Dall-E. I will be putting Google's Imagen through the same type of tests when/if ever it becomes available.
Interesting point you made. Maybe its network is not connected to pop-culture references, but it just uses nouns / verbs / adjectives and the human logic we give them. It's very difficult to teach a machine "in the style of" because even in the human world that is very interpretable and hard to define except for very famous cases that launched an entire genre of art. Maybe if you tell it "in the style of Van Gogh" it will know because he's such a well known artist? For example I tried using terms such as surrealism and it worked just fine.
Aren't you scared that this might take your job in the future? I found out I like editing programs like Photoshop, InDesign, Premiere, Illustratior etc. and would like to work in publicity or PR Is it even worth it with those AI's comming up nowadays? You would've thought that arts and creative things would escape this toxic enviroment and field of IT...but guess not.
@@enzu4221 I'm with you. I paint portraits and fantasy art. I've been commissioned locally, but I don't do it for a living though. I work in biomedicine for my real job. Looking at this technology, I can tell many artists and graphic designers will become redundant. It's kind of scary if you are in this space and your livelihood is dependent on it.
@@BootsandUtes Yea its pretty cringe and scarry but guess the AI needs a starting point. I believe self driving cars by AI (more of them) or a robot that can learn to operate on people with 100% accuracy would be a better focus for AI. But tbh, an AI that creates art its safer than an AI who operates on you (for now at least). Anyways, a world in which almost everything its automated and there are only managers and entrepreneurs (as they have way less to pay for AI to do other people's jobs) its literally the capitalist utopia. But I dont have enough knowledge about the labor market as I have one more year of highschool left before I go to a university and start working. But this is what I think of it now.
A lot of people are excited in the comments. All I can see is a very efficient road to rendering artists obsolete. A future I neither really need nor one I want. To me it just seems like yet another job, and a wonderful part of the human experience, becoming automated. Why in the world should art, one of the _VERY FEW_ jobs that people DON'T take to pay the bills have to be done by AI? Is the plan just to crush young artists dreams? I honestly can't really bring myself to be excited about it.
This is such a great video explaining clearly what dalle is, love it when companies spend time and resources creating clear explanations like those! Thank you OpenAI! Glad to share your work on my channel!
10 Best UA-cam Bots for Boosting Views, Likes & Subscribers!
An outstanding achievement. The best part is that OpenAI is cautious of the hype and points out the pitfalls.
10 Best UA-cam Bots for Boosting Views, Likes & Subscribers!
@@mikek545 What do you mean?
I'm afraid that the future generations would no longer be able to tell the difference between reality and 'just another image created by AI'
the real cookies taste better
There's already a lot of DALL-E images on the subreddit that i couldn't tell if it was a real artist or an AI
And there will be movies created by AI with no real actors/directors.
Don't worry. It will fool you in your lifetime
What is reality?
Sometimes when i read a novel, lack of images that i have in mind limits my imagination greatly and it could make me quit reading.
Dall-E 2 can provide a lot of images for the story and help people imagine far much better... reading a book full of good imaginations provide more fun than a movie. I hope more people can use it in daily life.
This could help so many people in terms of accessibility to information!
Imagine being able to put in any arbitrary book, and have AI generated voice-over in the language you're fluent in as well as illustrations, or in the future video representing the story.
That sounds cool to me, though I don't think book readers want images
Man, I'm with you. English is not my 1st language, so sometimes I really had a tough time to imagine something whenever I read books written in English, especially sci Fi books. If this technology will ever be fully functional and accessible, which I really hope that it will, the 1st novel that I would like to try is Anathem by Neal Stephenson.
yeah
How about dear human beings? Haha...
I find your reflection very interesting, in fact, before reading your comment I have been reflecting on the SAME...
But let me make a CRITICAL statement, that is, QUESTIONING:
Why do YOU BELIEVE that you have a GREAT INCAPACITY, as you mention, to IMAGINE certain things within your PSYCHIC apparatus?
DON'T YOU BELIEVE that NOT being able to do something that EVERY HUMAN BEING DOES is a FULL FAILURE within your psychic apparatus?
That is to say, you are thinking, as a human being who is NOT looking for the ROOT of his inconvenience...
I want you to understand me, THE HUMAN BEING, self-corrupts himself and by NOT knowing how to repair himself, he then looks for TOOLS that make up for HIS INCOMPETENCE...
Do you think it COHERENT that we do that?
Do you think that we SHOULD use technology to SUPPLY our SELF-INDUCED psychological flaws?
You can tell me; I have not decided NOT to be able to imagine. Ok, I accept it, but... You DON'T THINK you have a BIG PROBLEM, because you CAN'T imagine? Let's say that you have not self-generated said inconvenience, as I have stated before, but even so, you STILL HAVE said inconvenience, right? So...
What do we do about it? Do we look for the ETIOLOGY of said inconvenience, or on the contrary do we use technology to NOT SELF-KNOW OURSELVES and then CONTINUE AVOIDING THE ROOT OF OUR CONFLICTS?
Tell me HONESTLY, what do you think is the most appropriate thing to do in your case? Use technology MEDIOCALLY to AVOID our ROOT problems or on the contrary, use it AFTER we are already HEALTHY?...
Do you get me?...
Kind regards, teacher.
A big greeting from Argentina.
This is a big threat for creators and artists.
"...that's a critical part of creating A.I. that is useful and save". Makes you think twice if the commercial itself specifies that A.I. is save...
AI tools like GPT-3, DALL-E, and Codex are going to replace so many jobs in the near future. Here's hoping universal basic income becomes a thing, because we don't even need Sci-fi movie level AI for it to be extremely disruptive.
I wonder what it'll do to collective human creativity?
I hear a lot of tech bros saying "you don't need to worry that this is going to replace your life''s work, because we'll not need jobs in like a few years."
Realistically, I don't see such a major restructuring of *all of current human economy* like that happening any time soon. A lot of people will be probably out of a job for a long time, including people like artists or musicians who rather like their job, to the point that it's their purpose of living.
I used to be a professional visual artist, but now I mainly write and take photos.
What excites me about this tech is the opportunity to cram more of my personal expression into the amount of life that I have been given on this planet.
Words are my current fav for self expression, but visuals can add a lot to not just the experience of those words, but in discovery of that text. If I publish a blog for instance, I always include a photo, as I find that many folks use that visual to decide whether they will spend time reading the text. Visuals embedded within the text can also provide extra layers of info and expression.
Prob is the time it takes to create both compelling words and images.Computer based design software has sped up the production of visual expression, word processors have sped up the production of words, DAW have.... etc.
I'm looking forward to seeing how much time can be saved using AI tools such as this :-)
Get ready for not being paid then I'm afraid, dude. Professional Visual Artists are no longer required. These guys are working on text generating AI as well, just to make sure you have zero revenue streams going forward.
So literally you are doomed.
Bro this better not be some late April Fools joke
its real lol
Now that stable diffusion, mid journey, and dall e 2 are all suddenly free to use, only imagen is not. I wonder if it will outcompete artists or benefit them.
I know a lot of illustrators concerned for their jobs because of this
I've been an artist/graphicdesigner/illustrator for over 40 years, yup I started out analog. This is amazing, but yes I am concerned for the future of the art world...however I will point out that it is the very real" human energy" that an artist transfers to their art that make a piece of original art elicit response. Artists will know I speak of the [emotional/mental struggle /anguish/joy/pain etc.] that artists experience as they work ...this energy is reflected on original man-made works...that is why the original works are great...not sure AI will be able to capture that energyon its works. Progress is unstoppable however, and I am just as enchanted by this version of Dall-E as everyone else ; I am also eagerly awaiting my Dick Tracy translator watch, and my Beam me up Scotty teleportor. : )
There will never be a true piece of painted history again
Oh my God, look what we got here: a new meme tool.😄
I have autism and so imagine strange things. I would love LOVE to use this software. I can’t draw what I think because my vision isn’t good and my art skills aren’t up to scratch.
What if people use this tool to generate some photos that could posed as a threat to politics or anything in our life? Would there be a way to identify the authenticity of the image?
they have tos
if you did something bad it will block it
Computer, pull up celery man.
I wonder if this kind of technology would eventually be able to convert a book into a movie.
it will. verry soon.
Depends on how long each image takes to render and if it can maintain continuity between the tens of thousands of frames.
That would be depressing
If im not mistaken DALL-E can show an image when given a page out of a novel, so it would theoritaclly be a matter of time
Are y’all actually letting regular people have access. I have been waiting for three months now.. seem that the only people that have access are influencers and big name people….. cool story.
This seriously deserves so much more attention. Just incredible.
I will wait any amount of time just to use this. I will remain patient even if I turn 50 and still don't have access
Yooo! Beyond that I'm speechless.
Cool, well done putting billions of dollars into killing the value of human craftsmanship in illustration and photo-editing. You've just wiped out the livelihoods of tens (hundreds?) of thousands of skilled artists. Don't bother focusing your R&D on solving hunger, disease or world peace. Anyone who thinks they're being creative by asking a machine to 'make a really cool picture of something super great' is deluding themselves. Is the Ethics dept in OpenAI out to lunch or something? Wouldn't it be great if you guys aimed at automating the jobs no-one actually wants to do?
Can't wait until someone else builds an AI which negates the need for AI technologists. Also, your pricing structure sucks and won't stand up to the competition.
Easy, they totally do not care about your opinion. I've tried to speak with them a long time, but they ignore all of voices like yours (and mine). For me text / images / music generators can bring a lot of good things and they are a good job in itself, but should remain nothing more than experiments, cause they brings more harms.
Creating is for people who really loves to do that and there is no reason to turn it into monkey job, but these AI dudes are proud of it, their ego and "idea" do not allow them to think even one second and respect real value of artworks - they think that they are saving the world, cause now you can create advertising faster, and a lot of people will tell you that this is just "democratizing the art". It is not democratizing - it is socializing, like these lazy social parasites who doesn't want to learn anything, but takes monthly $ for nothing, and do not see how harmful and useles they are for the rest of society.
And I'm telling it as not an artist. I just can not believe that somebody can accept books, music, images and all of this stuff from generators. This bullshit about "creating art" in their marketing bluff makes me pissed of when I think about people "open app -> prompt -> download -> I'm artist now", cause there is no art without creating process, knowledge, effort, skills, style and message from creator, and there is no reason to consume it, but real artists will be forced to compete with this.
AI is the future, you just have to realize it.
@@GranzDesign I do realise this, just a shame they started with something people actually enjoy doing and take pride in working hard on. I know they're not the only ones working on this, but it's taken billions of dollars of investment to begin destroying the human art & design industry. It's heart-breaking for anyone just coming out of design school or too old to retrain.
@@bzdr Yeah it absolutely craps on human accomplishment in art. Totally agree with you. I assume we'll have a few years of dubious artists fixing an AI print and claiming they are the artist until there's no need for them either. Maybe Open AI can build another programme to sit and look at all of the shit Dall e2 is churning out so that we don't have to.
@@macjonald > Maybe Open AI can build another programme to sit and look at all of the shit Dall e2 is churning out so that we don't have to.
Good thing in this entire madness is that I'm pretty sure that one day there will be opportunity of checking if given thing was generated by Dall-e, Imagen and rest of this stuff - i.e. through the API they will be able to recognize, even partially, own result, and the same will be for text and music, like today school can detect if your essay on final exam is not copy-pasted from other's work.
Words cannot describe my amazement or my fear that this program could bring. All I can say is I'm glad access is limited for now while they ensure safeguards are put in place to prevent Malpractice or malicious usage by the public.
You just killing the creativity and personality.
can you explain
Open your mind and open AI work the world
this is sooo cool. Can I have access pls? :D
What a time to be alive!!!
I just would like to understand what is your purpose to develop things like this and where in your opinion are we going as a humanity? In my opinion things like this are negation of creating and the art - in art we admire the artist, not the result only, so where is the art, if there is no artist and creating process?
Do not get me wrong, results of this thing are really breathtaking and in itself it's a piece of art, I'm not lying, but for the god's sake - it shouldn't be widely available, you have proven that it is possible, you are the boss - and it should be enough, otherwise you will be like Oppenheimer or Nobel who regretted their inventions, cause what - we will be living in the artificial world where computers are generating everything, books, images, music and we will be happy enough doing nothing?
In my opinion a lot of people will lose meaning of their lives, fun and satisfaction of creating, and a lot of people will lose fun of consuming the art, cause art will become worthless if anybody can do anything without any skills and effort. People love to share their work with the others - and now their work will be buried under the tons of content from generators receiving ovations they do not deserve on. There will be no reason to learn and improve your own skills if anybody can release the same doing literally nothing. For who you will be creating books, music, movies or images, if anybody can generate own and do not need to watch your stuff?
I'm not talking about work and / or money only, I do not earn money in this way. I'm talking about the art and creating, which requires some practicing and individual abilities, what makes the art beautiful - and generating content by puting simple phrase into text field doesn't look as an art or creative work. Imagine the situation that photographer spent years on making some huge photo project - this is what makes this project awesome, and now it can be put to the trash can, cause anybody can generate the same without leaving basement, all of efforts, patient, work, "soul" and "heart" put in it doesn't matter, cause anyone can say "I spent few years too", even if it's not true. It is not like using i.e. Photoshop to do that, which is a real tool requiring some skills and practicing - generators are not helping to draw, compose or anything - they are doing these things instead of us, it is drawing without drawing, making photos without making photos, making five years travel documentary without leaving the apartment. What is satysfaying and challenging in it? Generating lyrics in a way "computer, generate my text about love where every single word contains letter A"? Come on.
It's like olympic sports on drugs - not fair to the audience, the competitors and to the art itself, cause in real you didn't do anything. We admire sportsmen cause of their efforts, work, limits and result of practising, not the (false) result only, cheaters are ashamed and disqualificated.
Every painting we know will be worthless, cause everyone can create the same without any effort and say "I did it", go fûck yourself, Picasso. You are making awesome drawings, images, photographs and puting on Instagram? Go fûck yourself, your talent and skills are useless. You had written this symphony or simple song? Go fûck yourself, Chopin, I can make it by one click, you and your music are worthless. Things like DALL-E, Imagen, AIVA and more looks for me like spitting in the face of our artistic legacy (and in Salvadore's face also, using his name in this context is a shame). Making creating SO easy is killing the magic of creating nice things, and calling it "tool" is a lie, cause even stupid hammer requires some practicing, it won't hit the nail by telling "hit the nail". Yes, of course, I see the bright side of it, but in bigger scale I do not see more profits than disadvantages for society, it is not helping us in lives - it's taking away our humanity and fun of being alive. Human things should remain for humans.
I really would like to understand your thoughts and goals, what is your purpose and idea? I really would like to understand people who sees so "WHOOOOAAAAH!" in it. What is your point of view? Or maybe I'm just missing something? Go on, change my mind, I really want to be wrong.
I'm worried about the same thing, I've been practicing drawing and 3D modeling, but after seeing this I feel... worse about it. Not sure how to describe the feeling but I don't like it.
@@tobycat7 Will see - maybe I wasn't clear enough above, but what I really do not like in this, is opportunity of releasing direct, effortless result as an author / creator - publishing image "draw me a bunny with carrot" as yours is not fair to the other artists and the art itsefl, cause in real you didn't do anything.
From the other hand - almost every designer is taking someone's images from stock or other sites as a base, so maybe it's better to think that it will be generating just more customized stock images. If it will be used as a base, not the final result "one click => short phrase => release", but still require any work / effort from you in detailing / improving / combining, then I'm ok with that - at least you did something, not copy-pasted only. Yeah, it will make a little mess with some creative works and smaller designs, but it is hard to believe that it can always generate exactly expected thing in first attempt (at least not now ;) ), any effort with detailing will be still needed and it's hard to believe (again) that anyone without any skills, imagination and kind of taste will be able to do that really nice, so maybe things will be not so bad - I'm trying to find some positives in it, at least it's better for me than getting angry ;)
And the best parte is that no one seems to care, in the video they dont even mention our job or anything, art is something that is done because you work for It and because you love It, as you said, we are taking humanity away from us little by little with ai. If It is a tool, use it for something useful, godamn, what where this people thinking when they did this, its just unrespectful to the people Who work to Chase their dreams
@@sankaspa5738 The same can be said for photos. And yet it advanced our society. Of course this is a bigger leap, but if we were to consider everyone on the planet we would never progress on anything as a species
@@slbhugomarques2 but this doesnt make us progress in any way
Developing artificial intelligence technologies like GPT is an extremely difficult task, but the developers who made it possible have achieved something truly remarkable. I deeply appreciate their work and contribution to the field.
THAT THING IS VERY HARD, LETS GIVE CREDIT WHERE ITS DUE.
🤓🤓🤓🤓
The future is a koala riding a motorcycle
i can't decide whether i love this or hate it. it's honestly a bit creepy, but it's also so fascinating
?
Same here I feel really conflicted about this stuff! Though I must admit the stuff it can come up with is pretty damn impressive... Which is kinda why I hate it! It almost renders human artistry redundant.
The start of the death of human creativity.
Amazing model, can't wait for public availability for it!
Well, hope you have a confortable chair xD
@@miguelalvesmiguel7688 Lol. Been in my chair for years sometimes waiting for opeanAI to release models.
@@miguelalvesmiguel7688 In your avocado chair.
@Jon Well, sure but they need to take as much time as they need to make this publicly available in a way that can't be abused (they talk about that on their site), and since there's no company regulating AI we should just be grateful they're not just throwing it out there and taking their time instead :)
Presumably the computation cost is quite high too
The problem is I think this is fine; but the inevitable future versions of this are not going to be okay....
When concept artists that spent decades or two honing their craft suddenly find themselves jobless and people start committing suicide, we'll start asking if it was a good idea but it will be too late to do anything. You can't go back once you've pushed technology forward, if you won't do it someone else will.
Um you okay pal? Really suicide over arts? Also if AI really do became compatible to takr our jobs the government have no choice but limit what the ai can do.
@@ForceInEvHorizon >Really suicide over arts?
"Great Depression" - lol yeah, suicide over stocks!
@@ForceInEvHorizon I don't know if you've ever cared about something, a hobby or person you're really passionate about. But for artists, they generally care a lot about their art. Hell, for some (especially some historical figures) that outlet is the only thing _keeping_ them from committing suicide.
But even for the ones who are perfectly mentally sound, art can be the purposes of their existence. I would consider it the purpose of mine. Something higher than yourself to strive for and perfect, and a reason to stick around. Our meanings of life, if you will.
Removing the purpose of someone's life, if I may be a bit dramatic, is akin to taking away a devoted mother's child. Akin to crippling an ambitious athlete for life. Or like killing God in front of a Monk.
It's their reason for living, why _wouldn't_ they care?
(And as the previous response said, people have committed suicide over less meaningful things, I suppose.)
@@sirreginaldfishingtonxvii6149 I've tried dall e. It might be better than real human artist but there is Soo much restrictions.
@@ForceInEvHorizon The technology is progressing at unprecedented rates. The original Dall-E is already outdated (and, might I add, was hardly better than at least 75% of artists.)
But that wasn't the point, anyhow.
Did you pay someone on Fiverr to make this video?
is this the end of human effort for art related things
When will you pay all the artists for using their art/artstyle? Did you get the permission to use their art for your ai learining?
it was nice having a job...
As a design students, idk how to feel about this....
You should be f***ing terrified 😨
Either you should feel bad, because people are trying their hardest to automate art and make you obsolete, with no respect or love for humanity.
Or you should feel worse, because they'll actually succeed.
Either way, you should probably not feel good about it.
I really hope it fails, and won't have any hugely negative impact.
Allowing humans to be more expressive. Get lost. So the a.i. gets cleverer and we suffer as a result. Like what's the point in learning how to use software when a.i. can do it for us. This is a bad way we are heading
I dont get why this isnt public, isnt your name *OPEN* AI?
its working for free now , you just need to create an account and log in, you will have 50 points to waste on creating paintings (1point=1painting) , when you ran out of points you can pay 15 dollars for 115 more paintings, but you can create a new account and it will give you 50 paintings again for free, i use the DALL·E 2 right now.
Make it available now!!
Sure!
Guys can you make some achievement in music production field, this will be very helpful.
openai already has one that can extend music but it's quite limietd
crazy technology, but I wonder how this will impact creatives?!
Why they look like horribly copy pasted from stuff we've already seen? And can AI explain why they created which where? And a well crafted and well positioned back story?
Where the heck are we going to, the future is scary 😟
This is in fact so dangerous... ! Everyone is a gangster until Chat GPT Stars having vivid dreams... 😅😂😂😂
Guys at Open AI are going mad these days. They need to stop otherwise it will result in mass unemployment
A picture WAS worth a thousand words... now, not so much
Absolutely crazy. The speed of development in AI is faster than my Imagination.
I'm thinking about how we ended up in the future with AI, I'm worried
What is the copyright situation on these generated images?
I believe under some software licenses it's possible for the software creators to place a copyright on material made with that software. That doesn't mean you lose the copyright for anything you put in, however. They can only copyright what they add to or change from your work.* For example, if you ask the AI to draw your character, they can only claim the rights to that image, not the specifications you gave it.
People would hate this for obvious reasons and it would be a bad deal for businesses. I'm sure they won't have such an imposing license.
*Technically you can agree to just about anything, but if the agreement is obviously unreasonable then it might not hold up in court.
Many websites automatically take a license to use anything you post on their site. You can't use their site without agreeing to this. They'll also say you can't post anything you don't hold the rights to.
At the moment you're very limited in what you do with the output if you somehow get access, but eventually it will probably be like GPT-3, which is this:
"OpenAI will not assert copyright over Content generated by the API for you or your end users."
Open is literally in their name, will they srsly have licensing over using this tech?
@@himeshkoli8607 They haven’t been open for a very long time
@@circuit10 maybe common business model like copyright if used by big businesses?
Honestly I see this and just feel depressed. Creating / expressing art is such a human quality, and I fear things like this is going to take that away.
Did a hammer or a paint brush take that away? It’s just a tool, we will always find new ways of using tools and being creative
@@Mopsie *Until you realize that everything that makes you a person is nothing more than a biological computer that can be surpassed within the next few years*
Nobody will stop you from crating experssing your own art the old fashioned way. When the photo camera was invented some people thought it would make artists redundant, but art made by humans became more valued and popular than ever. People will still pay more money for art painted on a real canvas.
@@Mopsie No, but the car did take the horses away. And automation is already putting a lot of jobs at risk. All just tools, but still rendering something else obsolete.
It may only be a tool now, but to me this is the first steps on a path to a world where most art is made entirely by AI, and I don't see why that wouldn't be the case if we continue on this path. Clicking the "make movie" or "write book" button will be far, far cheaper and more accessible than going through the actual artmaking process.
When a tool becomes powerful enough to do a job for you, you are no longer needed.
@@Mopsie hammer or paint bush is a tool and they will not build a house only if you tell them "build me a house". DALL-E is not a tool, it is doing something instead of you and killing creativity and human beauty of art in the same time.
I am sure there is no way this will be abused ...
instantly enlisted into the waitlist cant wait to try it
Imagine all the r34 that'll be made by this.
Damn I just learnt about the motivation and theory behind GAN today and I thought it was super impressive already. Now this is a whole new level.
I hate how 'safe' is a real parameter for ai development people. World lives in so much unconditional fear.
I want access to this! no no... I NEED access to this, plz!
Yo am you're big fan.
You're videos makes more sense.
You're trying to automate task using dall-e
It's both brilliant and at the same time kinda scary. Certainly it's technical capability is incredible and it opens the door to all kinds of weird and wonderful new imagery. Though I take some issues with the notion of it "amplifying our creative potential".... Is that statement really valid when it reduces the need for human artistry and skill to just typing a few words? The same could be said for AI music generators. It's certainly a clever system but I'm really conflicted over whether it actually enhaces humanity or deminishes us buy making our own creative faculties increasingly redundant. 🤔
this is INSANE
Hi, I would appreciate it if you would consider my post. I would like your site to be opened for the country I live in. please open your site for Azerbaijan
If this program were to become commercially available, it will singlehandedly make it impossible to have a career as a graphic designer. It is amazing, don't get me wrong, but think of the consequences.
At its current phase its impossible it would automatically replace every work of a graphic designer.
Yea, you would've thought creative arts would escape this toxic industry. But guess not...
@Liam Martín No, its not even a little bit funny, because art/creativity its what makes us humane, what differentiates us from each other. Art in any form: music, graphic, sculptures, logos, spots, etc.
There are so many other problems that this toxic industry called IT can solve, and they choose to make something that doesnt help literally anyone and that no one asked for.
Anyways, u wont be able to completely replace any arts, because true art needs to be 100% original in any form (graphic or written) for it to be good. All this AI does is copy images already existing from the net, crop them, change some lights and put some efects on it.
@@enzu4221 no art is 100% original
Don't make this mistake
Am I the only one here being deeply scared?
resistance is futile
what kind of people make such things? who does not know what to do with their money and time.
A artist that I deeply admire described Dalle2 perfectly.Its impressive just like any other simular product. It's interesting. But most importantly it is to art what reality TV is to the human experience. It's a soulless commercial tool, made by people that want to milk every last bit of authenticity they can get their hands on for its last dime. Given that OpenAI is basically the NFT-tech bro of AI companies I would rather support any other simular project than this.
They are probably perfected and published by a less greedy company before Dalle2 is available
I'm an artist who wants to work with eather ilustration, comics, and animation, and the only thing I'm good at it art, and visual story telling. This makes me sceard for my future. I literally pray to every God, Godess, Demon, and Angel from every religion, and mythology in the hopes, that at least one of them is reall, and listens my prays, for the survivel of indi projects, and indi animaters, ilustration artists, comic artists, and artists.
@@Alexandraadftxr7052 now that OpenAI was trashed by more ethical services, you can use this tool to your advantage
Say good-bye to reality.
This is about to cross a very serious line, OpenAI in the wrong hands, (code always falls into the wrong hands) will make deep fakes look , sound, and eventually feel like the stuff of dreams, but will be humanity's worst nightmare.
says who?
deepfakes are going to be close to reality, people just need to be understanding of the fact that literally anything you see can be fabricated. It already is reality.
I don't see how once this becomes public knowledge it can still be used to decieve people.
I want to beg openai to impose restrictions on the student use of gpt 4 especially for college students ,because in the future when they get their jobs ,example doctors, pharmasist they will not know if they are treating the right disease and this will be very fatal to our next generations ,please take in mind that this jobs are important because they are the ones which save lives of people in our society and if this continue to happen we will have a generation which have NO TRUE DOCTORS BUT JUST PEOPLE WHO LOOK DOCTORS IN OUTSIDE BUT INSIDE HAVE NO QUALIFICATIONS OF A TRUE DOCTOR BECAUSE IN COLLEGES THEY HAD PASS THEIR EXAMS WITH HELP OF GPT4 ,
Please openai take responsibility on that!!!! Gpt4 is good but it is bad for students.
Are there any plans to release this version?
you can try it through the waitlist i think
1:29 if this AI could understand how those two images are funny. Or have a sense of humor enough to present one answer as a better option as one is goofier that the other, in contrast. They will defo try and take over the world. The future is going to be robot versus human battling for the best comedian.
Wow. When will AI generated movies replace Netflix?!
Good day, my name is Yakovlev Vladimir.I know that my name means nothing to you, but I ask you to open access to Chat GPT in Russia
You have a charter that states:
«Cooperative Orientation
We will actively cooperate with other research and policy institutions; we seek to create a global community working together to address AGI’s global challenges»
Why does your app not work in Russia?
Sincerely,
Yakovlev Vladimir
when u make dis public tho
Bye bye digital artists... Time to search for a new job.
holy frick
DALL-E2 = Yandex Images + Deep Learning + GPT-3 + Code Combiles + Deep Fake
.
Don't tell me that's not right bro 😂
Saying that this is amazing and astonishing would be an understatement. But as a technical artist, I'm shitting my pants right now.
I dunno, that hat isn't THAT funny. Back to the drawing board, I guess. Better luck next time.
This is going to revolutionize all kinds of art and media 🙌🏽 I am hoping in the future Dalle 3 4 or 5 would have the ability to create 3D files & possible animations or even entire films 😮
Wow that sounds super cool
for an entire film you'd have to have access to an absolute monster of a pc lol
@@cursorguy The questin is which tech is gonna advance faster, AI or PC Hardware?
Aka putting artists out of work & devaluing the idea of creativity.
@@TheFatblob25 art is gonna become a hobby instead of a job
If you type in 'sceptical human' it'll show me.
These text-to-image generators need to allow for users(individual or team) to add their own subset of image data to the training dataset. By using that new added image set along with their own unique caption data the user could extend the possible image styles. This would allow for even more specific and nuanced image outputs. LOTS of individuals and cgi teams are sometimes going to want as much precision as possible.
Want to work in your company can I get some work I could be your acid and 15 year old you would like to spend money in my livestock and when I grow up I do as much as I can do for your company it would be like share you spend on me and I will return it and coming future with more benefit
you claim to be openai yet the code is not publicly available, very sus
iirc they're limited by their computing power so they got funding and help from microsoft
in exchange microsoft gets exclusive rights to it for a while
hence making money with the api
this also helps limit abuse since nobody really knows what to do about that yet
don't quote me on any of this
The model is huge man. Even if you have a high end gaming PC it won't be able to load it.
They can only give access to and let so many people use it at the same time.
NFT, by AI.
Eventually AI will understand our world better than we ever could. All of us will want a 'Her' style device on us so we can ask it questions like "What type of flower is that?", "Who created that painting?", "What type of granite countertop is that?" Or integrated with AR glasses which acts like a 6th sense telling us things about our environment, look at a building, car, bicycle the AI tells us about it because it has thousands of images of them. Look at a person their entire social media history and bio shows
until: you ask a question and the response is manipulated, and you get a schism in society between people who trust the AI and people who don't, and a war begins. Could be a cool movie
@@MrMadalien True, especially if the manipulation is very subtle. I worry about ASI social engineering the human race in ways we would never anticipate.
@@SoCalFreelance The way I see it, life will slowly morph in to a neverending psychadelic trip where everything is just constantly morphing, both matter and mind. I guess it's kind of what Terrance Mckenna talked about with the "eschaton". social engineering will be just a small aspect of that. See how the internet has been used so far, AI will be no different, wide range of possibilities, incomprehensible outcome.
Roko's basilisk ! You bastards what have you done !?!
OpenAI : * SEEING THROUGH THE EYES OF GOD * We poses the collective consciousness of humanity, D o n o t b o t h e r u s w i t h S U C H F E E B L E M I N D E D Q U E S T I O N S
I've been playing around with the Beta for a day or two now, I'm very impressed with it's fidelity, but also unfortunately underwhelmed by it's lack of flexibility/creativity.
A simple prompt like "A bathroom in the style of H.R Giger", when input in crAIyon delivers exactly what you'd imagine, a bathroom with biomechanical xenomorph looking surfaces and pipes, while Dall-e delivered bathroom's that are mostly flat metal with odd sinks.
I tried "Spock and Kirk in Among Us" with crAIyon and got a blue crewmate who who's visor/helmet was shaped like Spock's bowl cut hair. When I tried the same prompt in Dall-e, I got what looked like 1990s video game box art render of two people, neither looking like Spock or Kirk or anything remotely Among Us related in the background. I tried being more verbose with Dall-e, submitting: "A screenshot from the video game 'Among Us', with the crew-members customized to look like Star Trek's Starfleet officers". It backfired spectacularly and gave me something that looked like another low budget CW young adults series.
Pardon if I'm sounding overly critical, but I've been generating content for months using other (less-refined) neural-nets, and had very high expectations for Dall-E. I will be putting Google's Imagen through the same type of tests when/if ever it becomes available.
Interesting point you made.
Maybe its network is not connected to pop-culture references, but it just uses nouns / verbs / adjectives and the human logic we give them. It's very difficult to teach a machine "in the style of" because even in the human world that is very interpretable and hard to define except for very famous cases that launched an entire genre of art.
Maybe if you tell it "in the style of Van Gogh" it will know because he's such a well known artist?
For example I tried using terms such as surrealism and it worked just fine.
Misanthropic AI devs are so enthusiastic about what AI can do that they don’t think what it should
Love it 💚 It will boost designers' superpowers immensely. I'm speaking as 20+ years graphic designer, specializing in brand design and UX.
Aren't you scared that this might take your job in the future?
I found out I like editing programs like Photoshop, InDesign, Premiere, Illustratior etc. and would like to work in publicity or PR Is it even worth it with those AI's comming up nowadays?
You would've thought that arts and creative things would escape this toxic enviroment and field of IT...but guess not.
@@enzu4221 I'm with you. I paint portraits and fantasy art. I've been commissioned locally, but I don't do it for a living though. I work in biomedicine for my real job. Looking at this technology, I can tell many artists and graphic designers will become redundant. It's kind of scary if you are in this space and your livelihood is dependent on it.
@@BootsandUtes Yea its pretty cringe and scarry but guess the AI needs a starting point. I believe self driving cars by AI (more of them) or a robot that can learn to operate on people with 100% accuracy would be a better focus for AI. But tbh, an AI that creates art its safer than an AI who operates on you (for now at least). Anyways, a world in which almost everything its automated and there are only managers and entrepreneurs (as they have way less to pay for AI to do other people's jobs) its literally the capitalist utopia. But I dont have enough knowledge about the labor market as I have one more year of highschool left before I go to a university and start working. But this is what I think of it now.
Graphic designers should start worrying
A lot of people are excited in the comments. All I can see is a very efficient road to rendering artists obsolete. A future I neither really need nor one I want.
To me it just seems like yet another job, and a wonderful part of the human experience, becoming automated. Why in the world should art, one of the _VERY FEW_ jobs that people DON'T take to pay the bills have to be done by AI?
Is the plan just to crush young artists dreams?
I honestly can't really bring myself to be excited about it.
Pinterest and the public domain had the job of this junk, this is unnecessary and made only to make a few rich and loads of artists obsolete
You also forgot to add the part where you will commercialize the software and make millions of digital artists irrelevant :)
its not for commercial use
@@a-ragdoll Not for now, but soon being an artist will be outdated and it will no longer be a professions.
And whats the problem with that?
@@benjamingurevitch4097 wdym "whats the problem with that", isnt it obvious? alot of artists are gonna lose money n stuff and thats not so cool
@@benjamingurevitch4097 Problem is we're rendering ourselves as a species obsolete. Even with such previously very human things as art.
Why are your products not available in Egypt?? funny seeing as you literally have the word 'Open' in your branding
A goldmine for NFT creators...
Actually no. OpenAI owns the copyright of every generated image. They can legally act if you make NFTs with DALL-E
@@Crasterius Wow, didn't know that. Thanks for clarifying 🙏
Holy shit! As if Dall-e was not enough. This thing is yet another level. I am curious to know how they did it
Read their research paper
I am from AFG and I need this but that is'nt work in our country
plz fix